<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Haleigh Cummings Case Exclusive: Misty on 3 Day Bender with Lover and Drugs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blinkoncrime.com/2009/03/23/haleigh-cummings-case-exclusive-misty-on-3-day-bender-with-lover-and-drugs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blinkoncrime.com/2009/03/23/haleigh-cummings-case-exclusive-misty-on-3-day-bender-with-lover-and-drugs/</link>
	<description>Blink On Crime</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 13:41:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: McKafferty</title>
		<link>http://blinkoncrime.com/2009/03/23/haleigh-cummings-case-exclusive-misty-on-3-day-bender-with-lover-and-drugs/comment-page-3/#comment-1673589</link>
		<dc:creator>McKafferty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 20:24:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blinkoncrime.com/?p=675#comment-1673589</guid>
		<description>If you watch the video of the lie detector test with Misty.  When they asked her if Joe was her brother she said &quot;No, my cousin.&quot;  The machine obviously shows it says FALSE STATEMENT.  So how can that even be accurate when everyone knows that Joe is her cousin and not her brother.  What she was saying then was true, but the computer said false.  This makes it appear that there is a problem with the lie detector machine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you watch the video of the lie detector test with Misty.  When they asked her if Joe was her brother she said &#8220;No, my cousin.&#8221;  The machine obviously shows it says FALSE STATEMENT.  So how can that even be accurate when everyone knows that Joe is her cousin and not her brother.  What she was saying then was true, but the computer said false.  This makes it appear that there is a problem with the lie detector machine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blink On Crime - Haleigh Cummings Case: Sources Say &#8220;WE ARE CLOSE&#8221; &#187;</title>
		<link>http://blinkoncrime.com/2009/03/23/haleigh-cummings-case-exclusive-misty-on-3-day-bender-with-lover-and-drugs/comment-page-3/#comment-1572726</link>
		<dc:creator>Blink On Crime - Haleigh Cummings Case: Sources Say &#8220;WE ARE CLOSE&#8221; &#187;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 02:32:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blinkoncrime.com/?p=675#comment-1572726</guid>
		<description>[...] Sources tell blinkoncrime they are close to making an arrest in her murder. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sources tell blinkoncrime they are close to making an arrest in her murder. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keefer</title>
		<link>http://blinkoncrime.com/2009/03/23/haleigh-cummings-case-exclusive-misty-on-3-day-bender-with-lover-and-drugs/comment-page-3/#comment-1507353</link>
		<dc:creator>Keefer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:08:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blinkoncrime.com/?p=675#comment-1507353</guid>
		<description>Okay, want to apologize for this, but SOMEONE had to say it....
Could the weekend drug/sex thing be....UGLY COPING?!? Sorry Blink.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, want to apologize for this, but SOMEONE had to say it&#8230;.<br />
Could the weekend drug/sex thing be&#8230;.UGLY COPING?!? Sorry Blink.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oneshot</title>
		<link>http://blinkoncrime.com/2009/03/23/haleigh-cummings-case-exclusive-misty-on-3-day-bender-with-lover-and-drugs/comment-page-3/#comment-1502372</link>
		<dc:creator>oneshot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 07:22:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blinkoncrime.com/?p=675#comment-1502372</guid>
		<description>how messed up was that! 

thanks for posting her polygraph vid link. wondered what went into something like that....didn&#039;t know the computer actually states, &quot;false statement&quot; - thought the operator had to read the strip or something (like an ekg strip!!!) - so much for what I knew about it, huh? so, thanks for the education.

i wouldn&#039;t interpret her opening discussion about haleigh&#039;s outfit/redo of outfit as one of anger, i thought it was simply at this point in the process she started settling in, &amp; she let out a big sigh...she seemed very nervous...she even cried her own pity party a bit later, &quot;oh, i&#039;m only 17, this is too hard for someone 17&quot;..LOL right..doing drugs is soo much easier than a polygraph; someone needs to remind her: do the crime, you&#039;ll do the time.  it&#039;s too bad she didn&#039;t get jailed for obstruction earlier in this case; you can see she&#039;d have buckled.

silverspnr&#039;s assessment on her timeline jives with mine: sheesh. 

she&#039;s quick to point out her brother Hank&#039;s proclivities for pills &amp; molesting her, and to add cousin Joe into that mix. she gives her brother up for the stolen gun.  glad the LEOs are chasing those avenues, if only to rule them out.

i noticed how she brings him into the story earlier that afternoon before Haleigh went missing, as he&#039;d &quot;come over, brought his kids, they played together out front&quot; but she doesn&#039;t know times at all - not even approximate times, like &quot;oh, brother Hank/Tommy came over at about 4pm, left about 6pm b/c his wife gets home from work then &amp; she brought mcdonald&#039;s that night &amp; they usually eat dinner at 6pm&quot; or something of that nature.  too general, &amp; too specific make me suspicious, especially when the same person has mixed the specific and totally vague together on the same day. who does that? right, no one.  either you&#039;re an &quot;approximator&quot; or you&#039;re a &quot;stickler&quot;.

another example of this: notice how she&#039;s able to pinpoint the exact time ron returns home: 3:24am. and the exact time they called 911: 3:27am. (if i heard correctly). but as for everything else, VAGUE. 

i&#039;m tending to agree with ppl who are of the opinion that she was not home, that she either was partying &amp; brought haleigh out, &amp; when she was tripping on drugs, haleigh was taken advantage of &amp; murdered. or, perhaps she was out on her own &amp; had left both the kids alone, &amp; her cousin, her brother, or someone they were with who&#039;s also a pedophile/molester/murderer, came in &amp; took haleigh. 

then, you have to consider that she was keeping ron and everyone from re-enacting that night. she&#039;s street wise, &amp; isn&#039;t going to let it out that she left the kids alone, or left to party, or let someone get even with ron or herself by taking haleigh. she didn&#039;t/doesn&#039;t want to get charged with aggravated child abouse/neglect. 

just wish the LEOs would lock HER up for a while. get her squawking &amp; talking, for haleigh&#039;s sake.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how messed up was that! </p>
<p>thanks for posting her polygraph vid link. wondered what went into something like that&#8230;.didn&#8217;t know the computer actually states, &#8220;false statement&#8221; &#8211; thought the operator had to read the strip or something (like an ekg strip!!!) &#8211; so much for what I knew about it, huh? so, thanks for the education.</p>
<p>i wouldn&#8217;t interpret her opening discussion about haleigh&#8217;s outfit/redo of outfit as one of anger, i thought it was simply at this point in the process she started settling in, &amp; she let out a big sigh&#8230;she seemed very nervous&#8230;she even cried her own pity party a bit later, &#8220;oh, i&#8217;m only 17, this is too hard for someone 17&#8243;..LOL right..doing drugs is soo much easier than a polygraph; someone needs to remind her: do the crime, you&#8217;ll do the time.  it&#8217;s too bad she didn&#8217;t get jailed for obstruction earlier in this case; you can see she&#8217;d have buckled.</p>
<p>silverspnr&#8217;s assessment on her timeline jives with mine: sheesh. </p>
<p>she&#8217;s quick to point out her brother Hank&#8217;s proclivities for pills &amp; molesting her, and to add cousin Joe into that mix. she gives her brother up for the stolen gun.  glad the LEOs are chasing those avenues, if only to rule them out.</p>
<p>i noticed how she brings him into the story earlier that afternoon before Haleigh went missing, as he&#8217;d &#8220;come over, brought his kids, they played together out front&#8221; but she doesn&#8217;t know times at all &#8211; not even approximate times, like &#8220;oh, brother Hank/Tommy came over at about 4pm, left about 6pm b/c his wife gets home from work then &amp; she brought mcdonald&#8217;s that night &amp; they usually eat dinner at 6pm&#8221; or something of that nature.  too general, &amp; too specific make me suspicious, especially when the same person has mixed the specific and totally vague together on the same day. who does that? right, no one.  either you&#8217;re an &#8220;approximator&#8221; or you&#8217;re a &#8220;stickler&#8221;.</p>
<p>another example of this: notice how she&#8217;s able to pinpoint the exact time ron returns home: 3:24am. and the exact time they called 911: 3:27am. (if i heard correctly). but as for everything else, VAGUE. </p>
<p>i&#8217;m tending to agree with ppl who are of the opinion that she was not home, that she either was partying &amp; brought haleigh out, &amp; when she was tripping on drugs, haleigh was taken advantage of &amp; murdered. or, perhaps she was out on her own &amp; had left both the kids alone, &amp; her cousin, her brother, or someone they were with who&#8217;s also a pedophile/molester/murderer, came in &amp; took haleigh. </p>
<p>then, you have to consider that she was keeping ron and everyone from re-enacting that night. she&#8217;s street wise, &amp; isn&#8217;t going to let it out that she left the kids alone, or left to party, or let someone get even with ron or herself by taking haleigh. she didn&#8217;t/doesn&#8217;t want to get charged with aggravated child abouse/neglect. </p>
<p>just wish the LEOs would lock HER up for a while. get her squawking &amp; talking, for haleigh&#8217;s sake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BrendaT</title>
		<link>http://blinkoncrime.com/2009/03/23/haleigh-cummings-case-exclusive-misty-on-3-day-bender-with-lover-and-drugs/comment-page-3/#comment-1498794</link>
		<dc:creator>BrendaT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2009 08:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blinkoncrime.com/?p=675#comment-1498794</guid>
		<description>Kleat - that Misty video was fascinating. FWIW I too thought Misty seemed annoyed and definitely &quot;fed up&quot; about Haleigh having what I assume was a hissy fit about what she wanted to wear. Otherwise she seemed so composed and pleased with herself. 

PS shouldn&#039;t say it but I caught it from the off topic post and I thank you for it. I&#039;d have missed it for a while and I was very curious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kleat &#8211; that Misty video was fascinating. FWIW I too thought Misty seemed annoyed and definitely &#8220;fed up&#8221; about Haleigh having what I assume was a hissy fit about what she wanted to wear. Otherwise she seemed so composed and pleased with herself. </p>
<p>PS shouldn&#8217;t say it but I caught it from the off topic post and I thank you for it. I&#8217;d have missed it for a while and I was very curious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: silverspnr</title>
		<link>http://blinkoncrime.com/2009/03/23/haleigh-cummings-case-exclusive-misty-on-3-day-bender-with-lover-and-drugs/comment-page-3/#comment-1498593</link>
		<dc:creator>silverspnr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 21:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blinkoncrime.com/?p=675#comment-1498593</guid>
		<description>Kleat- #123-4
Thanks for posting the link for that video of Misty on another case thread. 

Yes. Misty seems quite angry that Haleigh wanted to wear a certain/special outfit to school. &quot;We had to go all the way... blahblahblah ..to get it&quot;.
I&#039;m sorry. I must have missed how this interfered with her busy schedule of sleeping the day away.

How about the blanket-washing story. &quot;The lady [as if] doth protest too much, methinks.&quot; 

Sorry to say it, but I have no doubt that Misty didn&#039;t think twice about letting Haleigh sleep in a urine-stained blanket, regardless of whether it interfered with her favorite (legal AND illegal) pastimes. 

And how about that TIME LINE.
Sheeeesh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kleat- #123-4<br />
Thanks for posting the link for that video of Misty on another case thread. </p>
<p>Yes. Misty seems quite angry that Haleigh wanted to wear a certain/special outfit to school. &#8220;We had to go all the way&#8230; blahblahblah ..to get it&#8221;.<br />
I&#8217;m sorry. I must have missed how this interfered with her busy schedule of sleeping the day away.</p>
<p>How about the blanket-washing story. &#8220;The lady [as if] doth protest too much, methinks.&#8221; </p>
<p>Sorry to say it, but I have no doubt that Misty didn&#8217;t think twice about letting Haleigh sleep in a urine-stained blanket, regardless of whether it interfered with her favorite (legal AND illegal) pastimes. </p>
<p>And how about that TIME LINE.<br />
Sheeeesh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

