Comments on: Casey/Caylee Anthony Case: Baez Ex Parte Motion Denied

By: kate

kate — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 03:20:52 +0000

Here is what I think Baez might have been up to when he wanted to meet in private to discuss his new defense theory. There have been a few clues sprinkled about that he has some surprising explanation for WHY Casey never reported her child missing.
I predict that he will admit that Casey made up the nanny story. But he will say she only did so to protect her family from [ fill in the blank=Mexican Drug Cartel or whatever they decide to use] because she owed them money/drugs and they took the baby out of revenge. So poor Casey had no choice but to make up something so she could save her family from the evil gangsters.

By: Gina

Gina — Mon, 13 Apr 2009 21:59:20 +0000

Wow, that would be a potential bombshell. With the Death Penalty back on the table things are looking up. My faith in the judicial system may be restored yet! Great info, like you said we’ll see but it gives me hope, thanks Blink!

By: Gina

Gina — Mon, 13 Apr 2009 04:53:08 +0000

OK, about the fingerprints I think it was the document dump right before this last one. I thought FBI forensics concluded there was no latent fingerprints on the duct tape. It excluded Cindy, George & Lee. I don’t think it specified Casey was excluded but I assumed if they were on the tape it would have been released.

I’m far from an expert on any of this, but hope it’s yet to be discovered that Casey’s prints were on the tape or somewhere incriminating. Is that still possible it just wasn’t yet released?

I found it in the documents at http://www.docstoc.com/search/casey-anthony-documents/.
It’s not the exact link you have to do a search from there. Which right now I don’t feel like, Easter & I have to go do dishes after a big family dinner. Thanks for your reply about the soil, I agree it would be a real ‘bombshell’.

You must think I’m a real nerd, sorry for all the questions but I admire that you seem to be a step ahead of other blog sites about the Casey Anthony case.

I anxiously await your updates, so thanks & Happy Easter. I’ll quit asking questions untiil your next update.

Gina, it excluded Cindy George and Lee, but did not state that there were no latents. We wil see how reliable my source is, but I have been told there are 2 partials of Casey’s prints on the ductape.
B

By: Gina

Gina — Mon, 13 Apr 2009 00:30:30 +0000

Blink- do you believe there’s any validity to the story from the National Enquirer that soil on Casey’s shoes may match the soil from
Suburban Dr. where Caylee’s remains were found? After the fingerprints didn’t pan out it’s hard to trust rumors, but NG mentioned it too.
Gina- I am not aware the fingerprints did not pan out.. That is not my understanding but If there has been a release on that, please link..

I dont think the soil matching that on her shoes is a bombshell. I would suggest that soil samples from the Anthony home, containing evidence of decomp would be. I am familiar woith 2 Floridian cases that have resulted in convictions without remains because of it.
B

By: Gina

Gina — Mon, 13 Apr 2009 00:22:50 +0000

Comment by IVOIRE — April 12, 2009 @ 9:13 am
HEY BLINK ..I FOUND AN ARTICLE WHERE DOMINIC CASEY GAVE AN INTERVIEW…COINCIDENTLY, IT WAS AROUND THE SAME TIME THAT HE VISITED THE REMAINS SITE (ON 3 DIFFERENT OCCASIONS) YET ALL THE WHILE CLAIMING -IN THE ARTICLE- THAT HE WAS “ONLY SEARCHING FOR A “LIVE” Caylee.
****************************************

I read it & PI DC is a liar, it makes absolutely no sense. Explain what condition PI Dom Casey expected to find a ‘live Caylee’ in if he’d found her on Suburban Dr.? Did he think she’s be running & playing, frolicking by herself in the swampy woods among the garbage bags?

That’s as ridiculous as PI DC saying the psychic was his tipster. I’m still waiting for one, any of these liars that belong to the Anthony’s inner circle to finally be charged with obstruction, tampering, something & put in jail.

Is it my imagination or do the Anthony’s get by with more than you or I would? What makes these despicable protectors of a child killer so damn special. Their behavior during ZG’s deposition confirmed what loathsome, nasty, pathological liars these jerks truly are.

By: Kari

Kari — Sun, 12 Apr 2009 16:15:08 +0000

I have a question about some of the evidence I noticed. According the the Orange County Forensics report:

Page 42
Tuesday Dec. 16, 2008
Art # 8, Item # H-51975
black plastic bag from car:
DINNER KNIFE

Page 42
Art # 1, Item # H-51975 (sealed box)
black plastic bag with yellow handles recovered with body:
STAINLESS STEEL KNIFE

Is there a connection?