Comments on: Sandra Cantu Case: Charges of Rape and Child Molestation Added for Huckaby

By: radiogirl

radiogirl — Sun, 29 Nov 2009 21:00:48 +0000

The charges themselves explain what freakish thing happened.And it wasn’t a freak accident.imho

By: Deborah

Deborah — Mon, 20 Apr 2009 22:04:24 +0000

Where was her little 5 year old daughter when Sandra came to play. Not one anchor person will reveal this. Two kids could have been playing and a freaky something could have happened………we all know freak accidents happen. Why won’t anyone tell us where the 5 year old was at that moment. It is paramount if she was there, then, we don’t know.

By: Ashley

Ashley — Fri, 17 Apr 2009 23:45:51 +0000

Cool thanks! I always wondered about that. I love your site but no info on you? No bio?

By: Ashley

Ashley — Fri, 17 Apr 2009 22:03:13 +0000

Blink, what about the use of satilite imagery? It would seem that in this day and age that those pictures are taken at regular intervals and could possibly provide some valuable information. This would go for the Casey Anthony case as well. I have never heard of this being used to solve cases. Has anyone else heard of it? I know that the images we as the public see are limited for privacy purposes but the actual images that can be aquired are very detailed. Just a thought as I believe the police knows the day and time that the suitcase was dumped.

Ashley, I am very familiar with that technology and it’s use in criminal cases. Here’s the thing, the resolution that would be required for workable images is probably not going to contain enough pixels for that exercise. I just worked on a case that we were holding out all hope that it would help progress the investigation to find out that area of the country is rarely imaged that way and has not been since 2007 for whatever reason. Point is, it is more of a prize in the cracker jack box when it comes thorugh than anything.

Aerial imaging technology will ID “foreign” objects sooner, and I would love to know if the aerials on this area reflected anything even after the fact.
B

By: Monica

Monica — Thu, 16 Apr 2009 08:10:58 +0000

I can almost bet that MH was molested as a child either by her father, grandfather or even her mother???? She is carrying on the torch!

I have a good friend whose husband molested 2 of their daughters. She divorced her husband, but the daughters have had emotional problems stemming from the abuse. They are now grown, but still continue to have problems.
Her husband says he was molested as a child. I think this is a weak excuse.
So, I think MH was also molested as a child…maybe by the preacher or others. She learned this behavior somewhere. I think she has been doing this for some time. It is not normal.

Something here is very wrong.
A beautiful child was killed because of someones mental sickness and secret abuse!

By: Christen Allen Iman

Christen Allen Iman — Wed, 15 Apr 2009 19:59:21 +0000

RE: Post 106

Good day, MackiezMom.

You had written: “Whether it’s lack of values, lack of a conscience, or whatever.”

I’d like to make a comment if I may.

Although I am not qualified to say which disorder(s) Ms. Huckaby may subsequently be found to fall under, I do agree that she has some very troubling issues with self-control.
She’s obviously lacking in this and this is also evident in her theft behaviors.
I believe she may be found to have more than one disoder.

I also agree with most that she in fact knows right from wrong and therefore she will have a very difficult time convincing the court otherwise.

Her post offense behaviors are indicative of someone who knows very well what they were doing.
Her attempt to conceal this crime, even though done in haste and without careful consideration as to evidence, as well as her interjection within the investigation, shows she was somewhat organized and cognizant of what was transpiring in all this.

-Chris