<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Caylee/Casey Anthony Case: Indulgent Definately, Indigent Hardly</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blinkoncrime.com/2010/03/18/cayleecasey-anthony-case-indulgent-definately-indigent-hardly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blinkoncrime.com/2010/03/18/cayleecasey-anthony-case-indulgent-definately-indigent-hardly/</link>
	<description>Blink On Crime</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 23:35:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blink On Crime - On Quitting Casey: The New C Word Is the New Quality Control &#187;</title>
		<link>http://blinkoncrime.com/2010/03/18/cayleecasey-anthony-case-indulgent-definately-indigent-hardly/comment-page-6/#comment-1721838</link>
		<dc:creator>Blink On Crime - On Quitting Casey: The New C Word Is the New Quality Control &#187;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 14:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blinkoncrime.com/?p=3526#comment-1721838</guid>
		<description>[...] Ms. Folmer, reached from her latest promotion to washroom hand towel service  had this to say: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ms. Folmer, reached from her latest promotion to washroom hand towel service  had this to say: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chica</title>
		<link>http://blinkoncrime.com/2010/03/18/cayleecasey-anthony-case-indulgent-definately-indigent-hardly/comment-page-6/#comment-1567178</link>
		<dc:creator>chica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 04:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blinkoncrime.com/?p=3526#comment-1567178</guid>
		<description>ragdoll makes sense, works for me my friend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ragdoll makes sense, works for me my friend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ragdoll</title>
		<link>http://blinkoncrime.com/2010/03/18/cayleecasey-anthony-case-indulgent-definately-indigent-hardly/comment-page-6/#comment-1566234</link>
		<dc:creator>Ragdoll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blinkoncrime.com/?p=3526#comment-1566234</guid>
		<description>Kleat, awesome post! So this is more about reputation &amp; ethics for ABC and Disney than criminal as I understand it?

Chica, gagagagagagagagagaaaa.....finger to the lip. I SO GET IT! It is far more overwhelming for me to understand this case. The OJ trail.......over my head! LMAO @ the LP statement. He&#039;s not in this for Caylee. This is advertising and exposure for him. He has no convictions. I loved his character initially. I thought he was charasmatic and I bought his theories. He just ended up making a fool of himself. I think he talks just to hear himself sometimes but I don&#039;t see how anyone can take him seriously anymore. NG has lost it too. Blah blah blah.... BOMBSHELL! I want facts, not drama and embellished emotions. 

Too lazy to spell check. Hope this makes sense....zippppppp!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kleat, awesome post! So this is more about reputation &amp; ethics for ABC and Disney than criminal as I understand it?</p>
<p>Chica, gagagagagagagagagaaaa&#8230;..finger to the lip. I SO GET IT! It is far more overwhelming for me to understand this case. The OJ trail&#8230;&#8230;.over my head! LMAO @ the LP statement. He&#8217;s not in this for Caylee. This is advertising and exposure for him. He has no convictions. I loved his character initially. I thought he was charasmatic and I bought his theories. He just ended up making a fool of himself. I think he talks just to hear himself sometimes but I don&#8217;t see how anyone can take him seriously anymore. NG has lost it too. Blah blah blah&#8230;. BOMBSHELL! I want facts, not drama and embellished emotions. </p>
<p>Too lazy to spell check. Hope this makes sense&#8230;.zippppppp!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chica</title>
		<link>http://blinkoncrime.com/2010/03/18/cayleecasey-anthony-case-indulgent-definately-indigent-hardly/comment-page-6/#comment-1566033</link>
		<dc:creator>chica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 04:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blinkoncrime.com/?p=3526#comment-1566033</guid>
		<description>Heidi
how weird that no more mention of the letters or the steamy affair!!

I have never seen such antics in a courtroom
order in the court !!
the court is out of order please let&#039;s remember why were here! for caylee. I would love to get a busload of us to orlando to sit on caylees side at least for a few days. what an impact that would make ya think.

baez is so readable when he lies he gets this cockeyed grin! I hope that  he will be investigated !
that smile may be replaced with foaming at the mouth if he is disbarred!! back to selling bathing suits!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heidi<br />
how weird that no more mention of the letters or the steamy affair!!</p>
<p>I have never seen such antics in a courtroom<br />
order in the court !!<br />
the court is out of order please let&#8217;s remember why were here! for caylee. I would love to get a busload of us to orlando to sit on caylees side at least for a few days. what an impact that would make ya think.</p>
<p>baez is so readable when he lies he gets this cockeyed grin! I hope that  he will be investigated !<br />
that smile may be replaced with foaming at the mouth if he is disbarred!! back to selling bathing suits!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chica</title>
		<link>http://blinkoncrime.com/2010/03/18/cayleecasey-anthony-case-indulgent-definately-indigent-hardly/comment-page-6/#comment-1566031</link>
		<dc:creator>chica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 04:10:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blinkoncrime.com/?p=3526#comment-1566031</guid>
		<description>perhaps ragdoll 
I certainly cant wait to see if and when this ordeal ends. I am like on my way to a severe mental episode of the mind !! Youmay find me starring at the tv in a catatonic state of mind, rocking back and fort mumbling Justice for cayle justice for caylee justice for caylee until someone either slaps me upside the head or  gives me a shot of trazadone. I am afraid I may become like the clients I  counseled  for many years!!who like joy had severe nut problems thats why they were put in the nut hut for until their spaceship landed into the real world.  . Oh did I mention that I have whiplash from trying to read all these documents  while trying  to watch  nancy on the tv behind me. why werent we made with eyes in the back of our heads?
I have a comment about leonord p who is full of p!!
I think that heavy ten gallon rhinestone cowboy hat is pressing down to hard on his cerebrum therefore making him twitch like  he had a demon on holiday in his brain.. 
then theres nancy with her good evening viewers bombshell knews tonitght!! and lets not forget her  actions when someone is giving her updates!!!  

here is Nancy whoa whoa whoa ellie jiolstead  are you  trying to tell me that!! blah blah blah!!

oh and dont mention the twins cuz you wont be able to turn her am fm radio off!!! geez what a circus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>perhaps ragdoll<br />
I certainly cant wait to see if and when this ordeal ends. I am like on my way to a severe mental episode of the mind !! Youmay find me starring at the tv in a catatonic state of mind, rocking back and fort mumbling Justice for cayle justice for caylee justice for caylee until someone either slaps me upside the head or  gives me a shot of trazadone. I am afraid I may become like the clients I  counseled  for many years!!who like joy had severe nut problems thats why they were put in the nut hut for until their spaceship landed into the real world.  . Oh did I mention that I have whiplash from trying to read all these documents  while trying  to watch  nancy on the tv behind me. why werent we made with eyes in the back of our heads?<br />
I have a comment about leonord p who is full of p!!<br />
I think that heavy ten gallon rhinestone cowboy hat is pressing down to hard on his cerebrum therefore making him twitch like  he had a demon on holiday in his brain..<br />
then theres nancy with her good evening viewers bombshell knews tonitght!! and lets not forget her  actions when someone is giving her updates!!!  </p>
<p>here is Nancy whoa whoa whoa ellie jiolstead  are you  trying to tell me that!! blah blah blah!!</p>
<p>oh and dont mention the twins cuz you wont be able to turn her am fm radio off!!! geez what a circus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kleat</title>
		<link>http://blinkoncrime.com/2010/03/18/cayleecasey-anthony-case-indulgent-definately-indigent-hardly/comment-page-6/#comment-1565889</link>
		<dc:creator>Kleat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 21:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blinkoncrime.com/?p=3526#comment-1565889</guid>
		<description>Casey Anthony: ABC News gets drubbing for $200,000 payment 

ABC, Disney, Fox, Orlando — posted by halboedeker on March, 24 2010 2:33 PM

(Hal&#039;s only got 12 comments on his blog story, maybe he can get response here, but fwiw, he&#039;s covering the issue still, on the MSM, good for him).

Quoting above story, in complete form, as much as anything, to document the discussion he&#039;s given over here, it won&#039;t get lost to future refs. ;)  (hope that&#039;s ok, Ms. B-- trim down, if you prefer)


The bad reviews just keep coming in for ABC News. Critics say the Disney-owned news organization was wrong in August 2008 to pay $200,000 to Casey Anthony and her family for photos and video of toddler Caylee Anthony.

“It doesn’t make them look very family friendly, does it?” said Andrew Tyndall, who analyzes ABC, CBS and NBC evening news at his Tyndall Report Web site. “It’s not just ABC News. It’s the entire corporation.”

“The O’Reilly Factor” on Fox News seized on the Disney connection this week.

“This happened in Orlando. And Disney World is in Orlando,” author Bernard Goldberg told Bill O’Reilly. “And Disney World tells people from — from the United States, from Europe, from Asia, all over the place – bring your children, bring your children to Disney World. Well, not far from Disney World, another division of Disney, ABC News, is paying a woman $200,000 who’s accused of killing her child. There’s something ironic about that.”


After ABC’s payment, Anthony was charged with first-degree murder in the death of her 2-year-old daughter, Caylee.

O’Reilly’s take on ABC’s payment: “It’s not a good thing.”

Seconding that view was the Society of Professional Journalists’ Ethics Committee. In a statement this week, committee chairman Andy Schotz said, “Paying someone while covering them breaches basic journalism ethics. ABC’s failure to disclose this business relationship as part of its coverage the last two years made the breach worse.” 

ABC News spokeswoman Cathie Levine told the committee that the network should have disclosed the payment to viewers and that ABC had instituted a policy — because of the Anthony mistake — to do so in future reporting.

ABC affiliate WFTV-Channel 9, however, had reported the $200,000 payment.

Revelation of the Anthony payment comes at a bad time for ABC News. “ABC has a lot going on right now — reducing your staff by 25 percent is a cataclysmic internal event,” said Tom Rosenstiel, director of the Project for Excellence in Journalism, a research organization that studies the business.

Yet Rosenstiel said the Anthony story reflects a trend in newsmagazines in recent years. In the mainstream media, paying for an interview is taboo. But newsmagazines will hire consultants or pay fees for video and photographs to tell a story.

“By and large, the networks will argue they aren’t paying for interviews, but money is changing hands and has been for some time,” Rosenstiel said. “The principle behind the idea that mainstream news organizations don’t pay is when you pay people you’re inducing them to make their story more dramatic. A tabloid pays for a more salacious story.”

Rosenstiel attributes the payments in part to the networks’ competing with the National Enquirer, TMZ, E! and other players in television.

The Anthony payment “raised eyebrows because the amount of money is high,” Rosenstiel added. “If the disclosure is embarrassing, then the cost of doing it was much higher than the money, and it wasn’t worth doing it.”

Network insiders say the standard licensing fee is far less. CBS News, for instance, paid George and Cindy Anthony, Casey’s parents, $20,000 to license material, and they appeared on “The Early Show” and “48 Hours Mystery.”

But Al Tompkins, an instructor at the Poynter Institute, a school for journalists, scoffs at the notion that journalists need to license any material to tell stories. After all, journalists have told stories without photos and video for a long time. But the ABC-Anthony story stood out.

“The amount of money is such an unreasonably high number,” Tompkins said. “You’re paying it to someone under suspicion of murder.  She wasn’t indicted at that time. But no matter how you spend it, the public perception could be that you’re paying for special access or you’re trying to curry favor.”

The problem wasn’t that ABC made the payment but that Anthony was indicted, news analyst Tyndall said. “I don’t think ordinary people get worried about the ethics inside the journalism profession,” he said. “What they do get worried about is the idea of money being paid to somebody accused of committing a terrible crime.”

(unquote: http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/entertainment_tv_tvblog/2010/03/casey-anthony-abc-news-gets-drubbing-for-200000-payment.html?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+entertainment%2Ftv%2Ftvguy+%28TV+Guy%29)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Casey Anthony: ABC News gets drubbing for $200,000 payment </p>
<p>ABC, Disney, Fox, Orlando — posted by halboedeker on March, 24 2010 2:33 PM</p>
<p>(Hal&#8217;s only got 12 comments on his blog story, maybe he can get response here, but fwiw, he&#8217;s covering the issue still, on the MSM, good for him).</p>
<p>Quoting above story, in complete form, as much as anything, to document the discussion he&#8217;s given over here, it won&#8217;t get lost to future refs. <img src='http://blinkoncrime.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />   (hope that&#8217;s ok, Ms. B&#8211; trim down, if you prefer)</p>
<p>The bad reviews just keep coming in for ABC News. Critics say the Disney-owned news organization was wrong in August 2008 to pay $200,000 to Casey Anthony and her family for photos and video of toddler Caylee Anthony.</p>
<p>“It doesn’t make them look very family friendly, does it?” said Andrew Tyndall, who analyzes ABC, CBS and NBC evening news at his Tyndall Report Web site. “It’s not just ABC News. It’s the entire corporation.”</p>
<p>“The O’Reilly Factor” on Fox News seized on the Disney connection this week.</p>
<p>“This happened in Orlando. And Disney World is in Orlando,” author Bernard Goldberg told Bill O’Reilly. “And Disney World tells people from — from the United States, from Europe, from Asia, all over the place – bring your children, bring your children to Disney World. Well, not far from Disney World, another division of Disney, ABC News, is paying a woman $200,000 who’s accused of killing her child. There’s something ironic about that.”</p>
<p>After ABC’s payment, Anthony was charged with first-degree murder in the death of her 2-year-old daughter, Caylee.</p>
<p>O’Reilly’s take on ABC’s payment: “It’s not a good thing.”</p>
<p>Seconding that view was the Society of Professional Journalists’ Ethics Committee. In a statement this week, committee chairman Andy Schotz said, “Paying someone while covering them breaches basic journalism ethics. ABC’s failure to disclose this business relationship as part of its coverage the last two years made the breach worse.” </p>
<p>ABC News spokeswoman Cathie Levine told the committee that the network should have disclosed the payment to viewers and that ABC had instituted a policy — because of the Anthony mistake — to do so in future reporting.</p>
<p>ABC affiliate WFTV-Channel 9, however, had reported the $200,000 payment.</p>
<p>Revelation of the Anthony payment comes at a bad time for ABC News. “ABC has a lot going on right now — reducing your staff by 25 percent is a cataclysmic internal event,” said Tom Rosenstiel, director of the Project for Excellence in Journalism, a research organization that studies the business.</p>
<p>Yet Rosenstiel said the Anthony story reflects a trend in newsmagazines in recent years. In the mainstream media, paying for an interview is taboo. But newsmagazines will hire consultants or pay fees for video and photographs to tell a story.</p>
<p>“By and large, the networks will argue they aren’t paying for interviews, but money is changing hands and has been for some time,” Rosenstiel said. “The principle behind the idea that mainstream news organizations don’t pay is when you pay people you’re inducing them to make their story more dramatic. A tabloid pays for a more salacious story.”</p>
<p>Rosenstiel attributes the payments in part to the networks’ competing with the National Enquirer, TMZ, E! and other players in television.</p>
<p>The Anthony payment “raised eyebrows because the amount of money is high,” Rosenstiel added. “If the disclosure is embarrassing, then the cost of doing it was much higher than the money, and it wasn’t worth doing it.”</p>
<p>Network insiders say the standard licensing fee is far less. CBS News, for instance, paid George and Cindy Anthony, Casey’s parents, $20,000 to license material, and they appeared on “The Early Show” and “48 Hours Mystery.”</p>
<p>But Al Tompkins, an instructor at the Poynter Institute, a school for journalists, scoffs at the notion that journalists need to license any material to tell stories. After all, journalists have told stories without photos and video for a long time. But the ABC-Anthony story stood out.</p>
<p>“The amount of money is such an unreasonably high number,” Tompkins said. “You’re paying it to someone under suspicion of murder.  She wasn’t indicted at that time. But no matter how you spend it, the public perception could be that you’re paying for special access or you’re trying to curry favor.”</p>
<p>The problem wasn’t that ABC made the payment but that Anthony was indicted, news analyst Tyndall said. “I don’t think ordinary people get worried about the ethics inside the journalism profession,” he said. “What they do get worried about is the idea of money being paid to somebody accused of committing a terrible crime.”</p>
<p>(unquote: <a href="http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/entertainment_tv_tvblog/2010/03/casey-anthony-abc-news-gets-drubbing-for-200000-payment.html?utm_source=feedburner&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+entertainment%2Ftv%2Ftvguy+%28TV+Guy%29" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/entertainment_tv_tvblog/2010/03/casey-anthony-abc-news-gets-drubbing-for-200000-payment.html?utm_source=feedburner&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+entertainment%2Ftv%2Ftvguy+%28TV+Guy%29</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

