No offense taken.
xo’s

Tell me if i’m missing something, but….

1.No news on depos till Dede takes the 5th. Lost “cousins” come out of the woodwork to vilify her and spread stories for a month or so. Nary a word from MCSO and DA about that. Anti groups and forums call her a murderer for taking the 5th on questions related to TMH or Kyron (on the direct and immediate insistence of her lawyer).

2. Rosenthall files a motion to compel Dede to talk and asks Kantor to go item by item to decide if she can get away with the 5th (constitutionally) for each item.

3. DA and Sheriff start looking at the case (thought they said they had no interest?) and decide that OTHER depos are getting too close for comfort in their (tunnel visioning?) investigative plan.

4. As with all other “sightings” and “testimonies” that contradict the investigative plan based on a possible “ping” to SI, new “testimonies” are deemed contrary-to-the-investigation.

5. One can conclude that within the information that new ‘depos’ have given the lawyers, there is a definite “threat” to the way the investigation has developed. I.E. a relentless media-pressure on TMH and Dede to confess, or slip up.

6. Is there another Tanner in the makings here? Or a Stenson that says the Truck wasn’t on the access road. Or a student that says Kyron was there at 9pm. Or a witness that says there was someone else outside with Kyron or with a male chaperone and two girls?

7. Whatever the witness is saying, can it be that it will convict TMH if it might take 9 more months?

8. I guess the “end run” around TMH’s constitution rights has ended. Or has it just begun?

New article:

http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/2012/11/multnomah_county_judge_briefly.html

Spark notes: Judge K. decides this suit will impact the investigation. He orders it vacated until next August 1st. A “witness” is involved.

Note to Judge K….didn’t someone file a 27 page motion to that effect a few months ago?

I’m thinking either this new witness has something more definitive on TMH or something on DY or KH.

Otherwise, if it was the SZ, they would have come forward sooner?

If TMH, why are they giving themselves nearly another year to arrest her?

You know, I was reading these recent news links and notice they don’t mention Kaine Horman.

I doubt it means much since the articles are about who is suing whom, justg an observation.

Well, I’m off to read the new link.

@Idahogal says: November 28, 2012 at 11:21 am and 11:47 a.m.

http://www.kptv.com/story/20200850/deputies-confirm-new-developments-in-kyron-horman-case
and
http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/2012/11/kyron_horman_lawsuit_on_hold_a.html