Caylee/Casey Anthony Case Scamthony Series II: Conway and George and Cindy Anthony In Court to Stop Autopsy Release

Orlando, FL– Tomorrow Brad Conway and his Clients, George and Cindy Anthony will be in court to argue against the release of the autopsy report of their granddaughter, Caylee Marie Anthony.

If your like me, you have been scratching your head since June 11th as to what standing the Anthony’s have in the first place to file such a motion. This motion was filed with the States Attorneys Office only and not even in Circuit Court. It was never served on the members of the media it refers to.

WTH? Did someone slide it under the door of Judge Strickland’s Water Closet? Paper Airplane?

In Conways motion disguised as an actual motion, George and Cindy Anthony claim to have an executed Power of Attorney over Caylee’s remains from their daughter Casey Anthony. Notice I used the word claim. In Brad Conways motion to the court, Conway references the POA, but never includes it as an exhibit, which would of course be required.

Translation: His Honor, Stan Strickland, took the Anthonys at their word, and stayed their motion.

(editors note: I am getting dangerously close to using that three letter word here: I T O. Does Strickland want to see multiple images of himself dancing on the Tonight Show?)

Read above one more time then come back.

AutopsyMotion1-1                  AutopsyMotion2-1                 AutopsyMotion3

So, you have a motion unserved to the presiding judge, unserved to the media whom the judge points out is the proper party of service, from people that claim to have “standing” as custodians of Caylee’s remains.

To my knowledge, that does not grant them any rights to her Estate or make them a Trustee to anything having to do with anything other than the guardianship of her remains. Not be crass, but in theory, they are the equivalent of a mortuary; that’s all. How many funeral homes or mortuaries are you aware of that can block the release of a Clients autopsy being released in accordance with state law?

Furthermore, the report in itself IS an EXPLANATION OF FINDINGS by the Orange County Medical Examiner Dr. Jan Garavaglia. It is the finding of fact admission to the court, whereby technically it is already interpreted. As a practical matter Conway may as well have said “The Anthonys are trying to spin public opinion as the court date gets closer and this will seriously bust their groove. We would appreciate it if you would tell the smarter than us people to nevermind and go about their business. ” 

Very Important detail here.. You know who is NOT requesting the autopsy be sealed? Her Mother. Casey Marie Anthony through her attorney is not requesting the report, reportedly 30 pages long, be sealed. This report contains a detailed summary by Dr. G that includes tests and evidence gathered since her initial findings which may allow for some conclusions as to what happened to Caylee to cause her death.

You bet it does. Casey knows that, and knows it leaves the door wide open for when she points the finger at her parents.

The precociousness of these people is stupifying.

The latitude being extended in this court and the cavernous berth they have been given makes me think I should mosey down to Orlawn do and file a motion for a summary judgement against Casey Anthony. The way this seems to be going, I’m thinking odds are in my favor I would get it.

I might suggest Jim Hoover hit the circuit with his photos of George and Cindy grieving “Ritz Style” while the very remains they are being charged with “guarding” were being recovered within spitting distance of their home, and they opted for a weekend getaway, gratis.

Related Posts:

108 Comments

  1. Sue says:

    Jill from Texas – You are right. The similarities are very strong. Have the police questioned him in regards to a possible one-night stand with Casey?

    Blink – have you ever mentioned who you think the father is?

  2. DeeinFL says:

    I don’t understand how the Anthony’s can say they have POA over the remains at this time. It is my understanding that they were given the POA so that the body could be disposed of by either burial or cremation. (Which is required by law). Since the body was disposed of by cremation, there are no remains. The Anthony’s did a direct disposal of the body when they had them cremated. There are only ashes left, which the Anthony’s can either bury or scatter. this would be the only thing that I could see they would still have the authority to do. The POA would only give them the authority over disposition of the body and not over the autopsy report.

  3. jenn says:

    So blink what is your theory about the computer searches on missing childrens sites b4 caylee was killed?

    Typo. and then search site. Sorry, for me that is so teentsy.
    B

  4. DeeinFL says:

    Also, the Anthony’s do not have POA over Casey as far as we know, whih would give them permission to handle Casey’s affairs, and they cannot have POA over Caylee because she is deceased. In Florida POA ends at death. Since Casey is alive she would have been the legal next of kin to Caylee. Being that Casey was incarcerated, she gave her parent’s permission to act as legal next of kin of Caylee so that they could sign to have the body disposed. A signature of next of kin is required for cremation as well as authorization to cremate by the Medical Examiner.

  5. jenn says:

    Also blink when can I expect your next report “onion style”? May I suggest the ugly coping defence? Very funny that would be

    My dear Jenn, it is neon to impossible to come across a subject matter that fits true crime and ONION WORTHY. I have to peel them when I sees them.
    B

  6. radiogirl says:

    So G and C make a media appearance to revere the ANNIVERSARY of CayLees DEATH!!!!!!!!

    So … they now have publicly made a statement that they too, in fact, along with law enforcement believe CayLee died around the 16th of June.

    But I thought Zanni had her? She was alive and well long after that date according to C and G…Feel free to insert any number of their phoney explanations here……..

    Quite telling…..and oh how pathetic.

  7. Cheryl says:

    wow – truth is stranger than fiction! I dont even think Steven King could make up such a twisted set of events & make up such strong characters as this Anthony family- ….what’s next ? I dont even think Grandparents will have any power to stop autopsy. Interesting that news media wants the public to know that the Grandparents are trying to stop it from being released though.

  8. Red Ranger says:

    Hypothetical legal questions here. John has a one nighter with a girl named Jane. A baby is produced. Two and one half years later Jane kills the baby. Jane is incarcerated but not yet found guilty. Jane’s parents, Joe and Sue create a foundation. They use this foundation to gain large amounts of money from individual donors and media outlets, all due to their daughters crime. They ride this baby’s legacy and victomhood like a government mule with their only concern being the next best angle to collect more cash.
    For the sake of this hypothetical let’s say that all of these people reside in Florida. Florida had Son of Sam laws that were struck down by the US Supreme court. Florida has since passed laws to restrict profiting from a crime that they feel are constitutional.

    Legally would John be entitled to any inheritance from his baby? If John had since passed away would John’s next of kin be entitled to any property or financial gain that his baby’s death accrued? For any money that Joe and Sue had removed from the baby’s estate, would they be liable to pay it back? Is there a legal responsibility on what to do with money gathered on the premise of searching for the baby when no physical searches ever materialized?

    If the foundation is one day found to be legal and valid is there a legal accounting for the use of the funds, like making sure the administrators did not use the baby’s money to support a couple of bums from south Florida or something frivolous?

    Sorry, I know these are a lot of questions and you do not normally deal in hypotheticals.

  9. IVOIRE says:

    HEY MAURA..I WENT TO LOOK AT THE COUNTY WEBSITE REGARDING THE 2 MOTIONS FILED FOR “RESTRICTING DISCLOSURE” OF THE AUTOPSY RESULTS…

    I DO THINK BOZO DIRECTED CINDY AND GEORGINA TO FILE FIRST ON JUNE 10TH ( THUS DEFLECTING ATTENTION AWAY FROM THE DEFENSE) AND HOPING THAT THE JUDGE WOULD GRANT THEIR LAME-A$$ MOTION….SINCE JUDGE STRICKLAND ODERED THE MOTION TO BE HEARD, BOZO BAEZ HAD NO CHOICE BUT TO FILE THE SAME MOTION 3 DAYS AGO ,ON JUNE 15TH ( OBVIOUSLY , THE AUTOPSY RESULTS MUST BE VERY DAMAGING )…

    IN ADDITION , THAT ALSO GIVES CREDENCE TO THE SUSPICION THAT THE JUDGE CONDUCTED AN UN-SCHEDULED “IN CAMERA INSPECTION:(OF) AUTOPSY RESULTS” ON JUNE 17TH WITH BOZO BAEZ…THERE IS NO WAY THAT THE JUDGE WOULD HOLD AN EMERGENCY “IN CAMERA INSPECTION” FOR THE SAKE OF BRAD CONWAY’S RIDICULOUS AND BASELESS MOTION..

    SO, I BELIEVE BOZO WAS MAKING HIS EMERGENCY IN-CAMERA PLEA TO THE JUDGE TO RESTRICT DISCLOSURE OF THE AUTOPSY RESULTS BECAUSE THE HEARING WAS SCHEDULED FOR FRIDAY ( AND HE HAD NO CHOICE BUT TO TRY STOP IT BEFORE THE MEDIA ARGUED FOR ITS RELEASE)..

    ALSO, SINCE THE ANTHONY’S FILED THE MOTION, ON BEHALF OF CAYLEE’S REMAINS, CASEY IS NOT REQUIRED TO BE PRESENT FOR TOMORROWS HEARING…

    6/10/2009 A MOTION TO RESTRICT DISCLOSURE

    6/12/2009 A ORDER ON GEORGE AND CINDY ANTHONY’S MOTION TO RESTRICT DISCLOSURE COURT HEREBY ENTERS A TEMPORARY STAY OF THE AUTOPSY FINDINGS AND REPORTS SCHEDULED TO BE RELEASED ON JUNE 12, 2009. THE STAY WILL REMAIN INTACT UNTIL FURTHER DIRECTION FROM THE COURT

    6/15/2009 A MOTION TO RESTRICT DISCLOSURE OF AUTOPSY REPORT

    6/17/2009 A NOTICE OF PROVISION OF DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
    FOR IN CAMERA INSPECTION RE: AUTOPSY REPORTS

    http://www.myorangeclerk.com/myclerk/Details.aspx?SessionID=d1439954-17cc-4878-9f03-98a7acc95eff&CaseID=6079536

  10. NancyS says:

    Blink!
    You and I are on the same page thruout this case from the very beginning. I do believe that KC will say that she left the night of the 15th as her and Cindy got in a fight (don’t know how much about that I believe) and she came home the next day and found Caylee in the pool, she panicked and lalala.
    I also know from watching is that Cindy and Kc are in a game of human chess with their relationship. (Just know from personal experiences)
    They will try to one up each other until the bitter end.
    THis poor angel is all I can say.
    So so sad this story is.
    They will try to throw her parents under the bus and I believe that is a SMART move on the defense (hmm if Baez has any brains at all this is a smart move) legally speaking.
    I just cannot see what you think Kc will plea on, if she does?

    Tell me your thoughts please.

  11. Sister says:

    The only thing I can think of in the autopsy report that the Ants don’t want out is the time of death. IMO Caylee may have been alive longer than the 16th, in which cause, the Ants “could have” been able to save her. I also believe the Ants and Bozo are working together to establish reasonable doubt, whether it is when Caylee died, someone else could have been involved, or whatever. All of their conduct is done with purpose, not by chance. The snipits of truth are not new behavior for any of them.

  12. NancyS says:

    OH and my thoughts on Caylees possible father?
    Very possibly Mark Hawkins as it would be a perfect payback for KC to have sex with him to get back at his wife for what she did to KCs brother. We have not seen a thing from him at all.
    I understand he is protected right now by the military job that he has but I still think this is HGHLY possible and they have taken DNA on him in California.
    He was in Orlando also visiting at the time the angel was conceived.
    Just some thoughts I have………

  13. Jill from Texas says:

    Thank you, Sue. At least one person is taking my hunch seriously.

  14. Jill from Texas says:

    And yes, B. You do appear hard headed. As you put it.

    It’s nothing personal Jill. Why is is everyone gets so testy when it comes to Caylee’s bio dad? I have said the same thing from day one and never changed my mind, it’s just my strongly educated opinion and I could be wrong.
    B

  15. Jane says:

    Hi Blink :)

    Poster #45 Im sorry but I think you’re barking up the wrong tree with that guy.
    There is no way that Casey would have slept with him – no way – IMHO

    And I dont think Caylee looks like him either.

    This refers to him and casey being a fantasy in HIS head http://74.125.153.132/search?q=cache:_-sUhaMT7ywJ:transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0904/16/ng.01.html+Michael+Kelley+casey+anthony&cd=11&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=au&client=firefox-a

    BUT this one http://www.topix.com/forum/prisons/TOK69LUVNVDJ4SK3E says he sends money twice a week and that he is a good parent…

    Im not sure that the myspace MKelly has anything to do with this

  16. dddeerma says:

    RR, thank you for your comment in the form of hypotheticals. If only some brave person would enter this arena and take the money from the Anthonys.

    blink, it gives me chills to think LE would permit a plea for anything less than LWOP. That means to me that the DP really is only a ploy to force a plea deal. It would mean that the the States Attorney Office is playing games, which while not at the level of the Anthonys, are still games with the proper punishment of this child’s murderer. With what Baez and Casey and Conway and the Anthonys have put the State of FLorida through in terms of effort and care and money, surely to bargain down from what is truly deserved is not compromise, but a LOSS to the State and its people.

  17. westsidehudson says:

    Blink

    Dude is fine. I have a long screen name anyway.

  18. FairestWitness says:

    Blink, why isn’t a copy of the actual POA included in this filing? How can a judge rule on this motion(?) if they don’t produce the document they’re contending gives them standing?

    The Anthonys assertions that the autopsy report will cause them emotional pain because Internet forums & media outlets will discuss and analyze it; so what? They’ve claimed responsibility for creating the very media interest they’re now trying to deprive of further information. Pardon me for resorting to a tired cliche, “You can’t put the toothpaste back in the tube”.

    well said. The stay on this was L A M E. This judge needs to tidy up his house or these people are going to bowl him over.
    B

    This is further proof that the Anthonys have lost touch with reality. They’re desperate to do anything they can to control events. They still don’t seem to get the fact that they lost control of this long ago, BEFORE Caylee was killed.

    They need to make a decision that they’re going to seek justice for Caylee, no matter where that justice comes from. They can love their daughter without condoning her murder of Caylee. It doesn’t have to be one or the other. Casey is still manipulating them, EVEN AFTER ALL THAT’S HAPPENED.

  19. westsidehudson says:

    Blink

    One more thing that I failed to mention in my argument yesterday was that while making an appearance on a TV show (forget which), the Anthonys permitted Conway to respond to discovery regarding the heart shaped sticker, and he stated (paraphrase),”There was no heart-shaped sticker attached to the duct tape”. The Anthonys did not break down emotionally following this segment, demonstrated no apparent emotional distress and proceeded to be involved in additional media appearances subsequently. I think it is important for the media attorneys to bring this to light.

    I agree, Dude. teehee.
    I just saw there is an incamera notice filed yesterday, did you catch that?
    B

  20. westsidehudson says:

    “incamera notice filed yesterday”

    What’s up?

    Dude
    I am speculating, but if I had to guess, Conway is attempting another maneuver he has no standing for. Have the judge review in camera and decide its inflammatory and continue to seal it. He is going to get his lunch eaten.
    B

  21. Autumn says:

    Hello Everyone,
    I have been reading this site for about a month now and i think its absolutely fantastic. I have been following this case since the beginning i have gone thru all the interviews and other documents, and have learned more by reading this site than i learned reading all those documents. Well i hope it was ok to post this comment since i am not sure if i am suppose to belong to the site by registering somewhere first. I havent seen anything that says where i would register so please forgive me if i was suppose to. ok well hope i can comment here again at some point if that is ok with you all and keep up the good work this site it great..

  22. CCK says:

    >>cavernous birth

    I think you mean berth.

    Even though I dont believe the parents had anything to do with the death of the granddaughter, I cant even begin to wrap my head around their behavior since her disappearance. Most of all, I cant wrap my head around the way they defend their daughter. They know she did this. I love my children, but if one of them had done this, I would not be able to defend them. And I would be saddened that I had possibly had a hand in why they grew up to be that type of a person. I dont always believe the parents are to blame when their kids are screw ups or monsters like this, but something is not right with those people. If nothing else, they are enablers.
    It has come to my attention I rely entirely too much on spell check and you people miss nothing :)
    B

  23. Kate says:

    Forgive me if I do not articulate myself well on this, but as far as the Motion filed by Conway is concerned, I would assume it would (and should fail) because “emotional distress” is not a legal basis, and given that is the moving parties reason for filing the Motion, and not because it would prejudice the defense. I am curious how a non-party (or I suppose third-party) can actually even file such a baseless motion. Additionally, as far as the “in camera” notice is concerned, what is the basis for that? I would assume (and I have not seen the Notice), that the purpose if for the Judge to find the release of the autopsy inflammatory. But, inflammatory to what? The emotional state of Cindy & George? How is their emotional state relevant to the fair trial of their daughter, or the ability of the defense to do their job? It will be interesting to see how the judge rules. Oh, and as far as the endless media speculation goes, I hope the judge recognizes that Cindy & George have fueled that speculation considerably.

  24. FairestWitness says:

    Post #69: ”There was no heart-shaped sticker attached to the duct tape”.

    Let me get this straight; the Anthonys are refuting reports about the heart-shaped sticker covering the duct tape over Caylee’s mouth AND they want the autopsy report withheld from the media.

    I’m getting a very bad feeling about this. Why dispute news reports about the heart-shaped sticker if the Anthonys are proffering “the nanny did it” defense? What difference does it make what the autopsy findings are if they contend Casey’s innocent?

    Why refute the heart-shaped sticker? Weren’t self-adhesive heart-shapped stickers removed from their home? It’s very incriminating evidence, yes. But so are the Winnie the Pooh comforter, laundry bag and garbage bag Caylee’s body was wrapped in. Those all came from the Anthony household, too.

    Attorney Brad Conway’s statement, authorized by the Anthonys, means they know what happened to Caylee and who did it, doesn’t it?

    Actually, in this case, no, he is correct, it was the outline adhesive found on the duct tape in the shape of a heart, not the actual sticker, but a heart shaped sticker which I believe was affixed to the duct tape originally.

    Get Ready, THEY KNOW her prints are on the duct tape, thus why they are making the distinction. Perhaps her prints are on both. She’s not getting out of that one in that instance. Seperately, they will say of course her prints were on there she used it to wrap herself in a flag, and the heart stickers from our house as well- Casey was a big scrap booker.
    Yeesh, good luck with that.
    B

  25. dddeerma says:

    from your mouth to God’s ears on Judge S and his reactions and responses to Conway’s lame motions. blink when your spell check fails you, most of us just smile fondly and let it go. I only scratched my head for a second about cavernous birth… it conjured up strange images.

  26. westsidehudson says:

    “Have the judge review in camera and decide its inflammatory and continue to seal it”

    Inflammatory: tending to cause anger, animosity, or indignation.

    Inflammatory to who? His clients ARE NOT on trial. Wrong lawyer.

    I have empathy for the Anthonys, but they have put themselves out, front and center, and merely want to control how the information is interpreted.
    They can do that through Dr. Baden , if they like, if is released, because you know that is what will occur.

  27. westsidehudson says:

    Remember, this will be the REPORT ONLY. Photographs will not be released.

    XACTLY.
    B

  28. Ashley Marie says:

    What time is the hearing? And will there be media attorneys there?
    11am EST and yes

  29. sweetpea says:

    Blink-
    I only recently discovered your site when little Sandra Cantu
    went missing. I am playing catch up on this one.
    #45; You state that you have your own idea who the father of baby Caylee is, this deceased father; How did he die? Was it a verifiable accidental death?

    Jesus Ortiz, and yes, car accident.
    Very nice and promising young man, I dont believe he ever knew prior to his death in 2007; all speculation on my part.
    B

  30. Red Ranger says:

    Hey dddeerma, I am solemnly curious if the next of kin of a man who is proven to be the bio father has a legal claim to all the money collected in the name of his deceased daughter. And yes, just the fact that I ponder that is proof enough for me that every exiguous detail “since day one” is fubar.

    I also admire the grammatical errors, misspelled words, regional dialects and colloquiallisms used here. To me it just kind of shows that almost everyone, everywhere, from all walks of life are on the same page in this case. The only shame of it all is the reason we are brought together in the first place.

    Lol, I think you just called me illiterate :)
    B

  31. FairestWitness says:

    Blink, do you mean Casey’s prints were on a roll of duct tape and possibly the heart-shaped stickers found in the Anthony home? What about the duct tape covering Caylee’s mouth? And didn’t the party Casey attended, dressed in the American flag, take place after Caylee went missing? I thought the Anthonys hadn’t seen their daughter & granddaughter in over a month before Cindy made the 911 call. How would Casey’s fingerprints get on the duct tape during a timeframe when she wasn’t living at home? These people are completely irrational.

  32. Curious says:

    Hey Blink,
    Is this the guy that Casey said was the father of Caylee, who died in a car accident? The one who’s obituary she cut out of the paper to show her parents? Or, is it somebody different? I was under the impression that that was just another one of Casey’s made up stories.

  33. SUSAN says:

    does anyone know how to interpret the decomposition results from the trunk?they come up with less than 2.6 days,from when?doesnt decomposition keep decomposing?i cant figure this out.they must preserve it to stop the decomposing.then test how old it is.i am entertaining various combinations of timeframes but ….?

  34. FairestWitness says:

    No Blink, not illiterate! You’re a “creative” typist. BTW, it takes one to know one.

    People who spend their time pointing out spelling errors and typos ought to focus on the content. You’re not submitting a manuscript here, you’re crime reporting and blogging.

    All you frustrated, would-be grammar and English teachers need to lighten up.

    O Fairest, I was teasing. Red Ranger is my peeps. I dont think its a secret that my cup doesnt runneth over in the grammar department but I look on the bright side as my smartass definately does :)
    B

  35. Sue says:

    Blink – OK – now you and I both agree that this case is never going to go to trial, but we both have different reasons. (I think). But my question is this: If the finger is going to be pointed at grandparents, Cindy and George, then why would she (Casey) ever even consider taking a plea if this is going to cause reasonable doubt? All’s it takes is one juror to believe that story, or one juror to be paid off. Wouldn’t Casey take her chances with a trial??
    Because she does not know for certain that her prints are on the duct tape. That will kill any chance of a plea. Confusing jurors as to “who done it” because it only takes one is not a new strategy, but it will fail this girl.
    B

  36. Annals says:

    Respectfully; typos, gramatical errors, and misspellings often DO impair the reader’s clarity as per meaning. If anyone asks for clarification due to a written mistake, please don’t assume it’s done in order to be critical or petty. I am a careful reader who wants to understand the content. I spend plenty of time trying to substitute the correct homophone in order to get the meaning. Why? Because I value the content on this site; both in the articles and the comments.

    It’s not that I don’t sympathize, I am a terrible speller.

    I am more often than not clueless as to the meanings of the acronyms here. I am addressing no one in particular; I am just sometimes taken aback by the attacks on those who try to clarify a mistake.

  37. Riddlemethis says:

    Kate Post #73, It’s been said before I think, but liked the way you laid it out in that post. B- was right on the money there and called it straight up.

    dddeer !!! “I only scratched my head for a second about cavernous birth… it conjured up strange images.” ROFLMAO!!! and again :) !!

    Fairest #81, I “think” the “anything but clothes” party with the flag was in May. I also thought they (Amy H?) said no duct tape was used for the costuming, or at least the Flag. Could be wrong. Casey was known to be in and out of the house during the entire time, plus they’ll just say her prints were there from prior use, just like on the car, or the gas cans….or the stolen checks….or the bottles of stuff for the cloroform “cleaning agents”….you know, just the normal everyday stuff. Never you mind if hers are the only prints on the tape and sticker, the real murder used gloves, dont cha no?

    May 25 to be precise, yes.
    B

  38. FairestWitness says:

    Sorry, Blink. Guess I haven’t been here long enough yet to recognize when you’re yanking someone’s chain. I’ll follow my own advice and lighten up!! (:~D

  39. Denise says:

    Blink,

    Does LE know who the father is? Did they pursue some type of DNA testing? I realize they tested Lee with negative results, but did they do any other tests that you are aware of? Did they do any DNA test that you are possibly speculating about? Do you think we will find out at trial (if it goes to trial) who Caylee’s father was? If LE knows, does the family know? I know, a lot of questions, but I just don’t see LE letting this go, “Oh well, it wasn’t Lee, I guess it doesn’t matter.” They wouldn’t do that, would they?

    Thanks,
    D

  40. Angela says:

    Blink – you posted yesterday that you don’t think Jesus O knew that he was the father. However there is one beautiful photo of him holding Caylee (on a porch looks like – I bet you’ve seen the pic) where they look like carbon copies of each other and he’s holding her so tenderly – ok I found it here scroll all the way down on this page: ok- how could he not know??
    http://websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?t=71666&page=5

    Because that is not Jesus Ortiz.
    B

  41. Angela says:

    Gosh, I have thought all along it was him. So who is this then?

  42. [...] reported exclusively at blinkoncrime.com in the second installment of the Scamthony Series, I am at a loss as to how this motion made the docket in the first place, let alone how Judge [...]

  43. dddeerma says:

    …scratching head…have I been insulted? by Red Ranger? Or is it just an admission of a shared interest in something so unimportant? beats me.

  44. Kleat says:

    Angela #90, I’m no photo photoshop expert, don’t know if the baby and setting are consistent with each other, the lighting on Caylee’s back does show a lot of light as from windows in what looks like a sun-room/enclosed porch, the light on her face is natural too, with the light from the windows. Then look at this guy’s face and compare the lighting on the right side and the almost equal lighting of his cheeks. I don’t think Caylee was causing that much shadow area on the right side of his face, but even if so, the lighting on his cheeks is pretty much equal and from the front. Something doesn’t look consistent in the man’s photo for the scene, just MHAO, the photo probably would need to be looked at more closely to see if it was ‘shopped. Doesn’t look like a camera flash either, as being consistent with both faces.

  45. Red Ranger says:

    Hey dddeerma, No, not insulted at all.I am truly curious if Caylee’s paternal grandparents and family have legal rights to Caylee’s estate.

    I also do appreciate ALL of the typos, grammaticos, misuse of words, etc. that each and every poster includes in their posts. While it does not happen in every post, it happens often enough to show that we are all human. I have a special fondness for the made up words, sniglets if you will. Some of them make me holler laugh and for that I am thankful. And I also realize that my guilt is equal to all.

  46. Casey go pop crackle fry says:

    Comment by Angela — June 19, 2009 @ 3:27 pm
    Gosh, I have thought all along it was him. So who is this then
    ————————

    I believe that is the other cop Casey was bedding – Anthony “Tony” Rusciano. He was fired for lying about his relationship with Casey.

  47. Angela says:

    Thanks for looking, but no, there is video of Rusciano here and you can see he has a different face, thick eyebrows, straight nose, kinda square face:
    http://daliagirl33.wordpress.com/2008/08/26/deputy-fired-for-lying-about-relationship-with-casey/

  48. Casey go pop crackle fry says:

    Oh my! I have never seen such eyebrows, except maybe for George. Who is the guy in that picture holding Caylee? Inquirng minds want to know.

  49. fairand balanced says:

    This blogger simply used your post on the Orlando Sentinel’s TV/Entertainment blogsite. (See below.) Is this a form of flattery?

    “In Conways motion disguised as an actual motion, George and Cindy Anthony claim to have an executed Power of Attorney over Caylee’s remains from their daughter Casey Anthony. Notice I used the word claim. In Brad Conways motion to the court, Conway references the POA, but never includes it as an exhibit, which would of course be required.”

    “Very Important detail here.. You know who is NOT requesting the autopsy be sealed? Her Mother. Casey Marie Anthony through her attorney is not requesting the report, reportedly 30 pages long, be sealed. This report contains a detailed summary by Dr. G that includes tests and evidence gathered since her initial findings which may allow for some conclusions as to what happened to Caylee to cause her death.

    ” Casey knows that, and knows it leaves the door wide open for when she points the finger at her parents. ”

    Justice for Caylee MarieAnthony

    http://blinkoncrime.com/2009/06/18/cayleecasey-anthony-case-scamthony-series-ii-conway-and-george-and-cindy-anthony-in-court-to-stop-autopsy-release/

    Posted by: JRG | June 20, 2009 at 11:10 PM

  50. fairand balanced says:

    omygosh. the more i read here, the more i see what has been copied and posted into blogs on the OS TV Entertainment website. i’ve never been over here before and if that plagiarist hadn’t used your url, i never would have known either. well, i’m glad to see a kinder and gentler blogsite here. thanks.

    Well thank ya kindly-
    B

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment