Haleigh Cummings Case: Pond in Putnam County Drained
BREAKING NEWS
Satsuma, FL– In the latest developments in the case of missing 6 year old Satsuma girl Haleigh Cummings, deputies are searching the woods and draining a pond on Stokes Landing Road.
Neighbors have reported the roads to the pond have been blocked off, and the crew draining the pond have been on scene since Police dive teams were deployed to the pond Friday morning.
This development comes on the heels of the arrest of Hank Croslin, Misty Cummings brother less than 24 hours earlier on an unrelated firearms charge.
Hank Croslin’s wife Lindsay, his sister and Haleigh Cummings step-mother, Misty Cummings, were at Satsuma Police HQ Friday morning.
There are unconfirmed rumors that Misty Cummings is in police custody. Recently, Misty Cummings sought the help of Texas Equusearch founder Tim Miller. Through the efforts of TES attorney Mark Nejame, Misty took a series of lie detector tests Miller said she failed miserably.
Reached for comment this morning, Mark Nejame told blinkoncrime.com the pond was in fact being drained, but had no new information.
Check back to blinkoncrime.com for updates.
Contributing Editor Kate Mills
Related Posts
Related Posts:
249 Comments
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
Blink,
I am so glad to see activity on this poor child’s case. It seemed as thought it just went off the radar for months. I was beginning to think that they had just given up on her.
It appears as though they may have suspected the brother for sometime and were just keeping an eye on him.
Sorry if this is a repost, found it this morning. Discusses voice-stress test on Misty providing questions and answers where possible.
http://www.firstcoastnews.com/news/news-article.aspx?storyid=144098
Misty is all over the place and Lord…English is awfully rough, but proves she knows LE is aware of her gamee.
definitely two tall trees around that pond!
Hey JO,
I would be interested in knowing what your original thoughts were on this. I got a “tip” from someone I correspond with a while back. I did send it in once it looked like this case might be going cold. Just wondering if it is close to what you got or not. Thanks
———————————————————————
My request to Firefly:
I think you should not give up on trying to locate missing children. You were right on with the Sandra Cantu case. Anyone who gave you a hard time about that is crazy. I wish you would try on the Haleigh Cummings case. I would really like to know what your thoughts are on it.
First response from Firefly:
5/25/09
I think she was taken by someone she knew. Seems like she was in swimming trunks. The person who took her was a male who had given her a red doll, or stuffed animal. Like a red elephant or something. He had been hung up on her for a while. Probably never done anything this extreme before this, and has been very careful about hiding other things he might have done.
Second response from Firefly:
6/4/09
About the Hailey Cummings missing girl…whoever it is that took her that she knew…he owns two pieces of property, or has access to two pieces. One of them is nearer a lake. I think he buried her on this second piece of property. The land doesn’t border the lake though. So she is buried two or three yards away from this lake, probably on the eastern edge of the boundary line.
Or so I think.
———————————————————————
I have had personal experience with firefly, and she has been right on. Of course, nobody’s perfect! But, I do believe that there are people who truly have a gift. It’s just too bad there are so many “fakes” out there. They ruin it for the people who might actually be able to help.
If you care to share your thoughts, I would be interested to know.
Thank you!
Is it possible that, if Misty was partying earlier that night, that Haleigh could have been taken along? But then there is Jr, he could have said something to indicate that, unless he would just fall asleep and not fuss.
The Assoc. Content article linked above makes me wonder if Misty actually only left Haleigh’s little brother alone while he slept and took Haleigh WITH her to this ‘Notorious Party’ @ this L-shaped pond? Would explain the child’s bed never being slept in…would explain rumours Misty left the trailer that night…would also explain why Haleigh’s little brother heard someone with “squeaky shoes” had these shoes been in a wet area!!! Added up all of a sudden for me anyhow. Whatever happened to Haleigh I’m sure was already over with when Misty was dropped back off @ whatever time and the guest who came into the home may or may not have stayed long other than to help her set up a scenario?
http://www.wpbf.com/news/21012034/detail.html
‘A sheriff’s office spokesperson issued a statement saying divers did not find the little girl’s body’.
Has this been confirmed?
Kew, thanks!!– didn’t see your post until this morning– yes, that one must be it. The reported link via waterways to the Buffalo Bluffs side of the river as per Ms. Bauer’s statements couldn’t be possible for this pond or others near 19– of course that info was either wrong or misinterpreted. (the info may have just meant from one side of the river to the other, winding through those islands in the channel, not winding all the way to that pond!!)
jeez, I thought it was the child molesting cousin Joe who took her. Of course, the brother is the one who said Joe went to bed in his clothes that night instead of his boxers, and who wasn’t there when (Tim, I guess) said he woke up at 1 a.m., and who said the keys to the van had been moved and the van had a scratch on it. I guess the bro could be lying about all that.
I still think that there is a definite reason behind RC marrying her. Perhaps to keep her quiet…although she is def the catch of the year
kyrasmommy, as NG relentlessly points out, the mere fact ron and misty are married won’t protect them from testifying against each other under florida law (cause a child is involved), so I’m sticking with the statutory rape angle—it is legal in FL for a 23 year old to be schtupping a 16 or 17 y.o., , but he was 26 and she was 17, which is a felony. I am sure this came to his attention when the police and media came calling, and suddenly they were engaged and married just 28 days after haleigh went missing.
Florida
The age of consent in Florida is 18, but close in age exemptions exist. By law, the exception permits a person 23 years of age or younger to engage in legal sexual activity with a minor aged 16 or 17.
794.05 Unlawful sexual activity with certain minors.– (1) A person 24 years of age or older who engages in sexual activity with a person 16 or 17 years of age commits a felony of the second degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084.
kyra’s mommy, I’m thinking he married to her keep the enemy close as he’s alluded to in the past.
mjh..on firefly saying Haleigh was in swim trunks, as kleat and I wondered about her being taken along, would make sense Misty had her in swim trunks. Do we know if Misty’s cousin is reported to have been at this party by the pond?
Thanks, Brenda in VA: didn’t know he was a convicted felon. The amount seems excessive to me, as does the response– the questioning of the other leading people in the case. Re-questioning Nay Nay Prevatt points back to Misty as the center of this new activity. It all just got my hinky meter going. That was what I meant: something else seems to be going on here. The Sheriff’s office actually lying for several days about the search is hinky-inciting too. Why should they bother? Regarding the difficulty of navigating the river: locals know where to go, how the current runs, etc. You would never catch me on the Miss. at night, but there are folks who love it. The professional fishermen go out before dawn every day.
What about the appearance of Greg Page photo under a different arrest and then changed back?
B
so does anyone know what was found
# 57
Suz,
Interesting post. I have never read any of that before. Do you have a link or idea where I can read/research more about these points. Verrrrrry interesting.
#54
Brenda in Virginia,
Enjoyed your comment. I have suspected that Misty:
1. Around 8:30pm fought with your boyfriend over the phone.
2. She left after she put the kids in “her” bed.
3. She left to party.
3b. She props the back door open so as not to wake the kids or be seen from the front of the house.
4. Later in the night Ronal calls and she doesn’t answer, after calling several times he calls two of Misty’s brothers looking for her.
5. Someone at the “their little get together” knows the children are home alone.
6. Someone with “squeeky” wet shoes enter and takes Haleigh.
7. Why did Misty call Timmy so often the “night” Haleigh goes missing.
8. I also read that dirty clothes were piled in the dryer. Hmmmmmmmm? A quick clean up? Easier to get in and out the back door? Hmmmmmmm……
Hi Brenda,
I was actually never sure what the swim trunks meant, as swim trunks are usually meant for a boy, not a girl. It just seemed to signify water to me. You could be right; I’m sure Misty could have taken her along. Of course, that would mean she left the little boy home all alone ?? Would somebody actually do that? I guess nothing should surprise me anymore.
Maybe, as Randie said, while Misty was out partying, someone who was there, who knew the children would be home alone, took the opportunity to go back to the house and take Haleigh. If he was someone she knew and trusted, she may have gone with him no problem. Of course, this is all just speculation. I really have no idea what really transpired that night. But, I’m sure Misty knows.
It really bugs the he** out of me that she is not telling the truth.
Also, I was hoping that firefly was “off” this time, and that Haleigh would be found alive somewhere. Maybe just wishful thinking? It has been quite a long time. But, I think we are all always hoping for a happy ending in these cases. Unfortunately, it seems that “happy endings” are very rare these days.
Hi everybody ! Special thx for Kleat – great info and maps
Now, one of the brothers is Timmy ; the other is Hank , the guy in trouble with the gun..It does seem to me that there would be a plea comming..Cannt wait to see what s going to come out of all this ? Any updates on the rest of the poeple who were held the other day?
Tried to pull some info about the White boy – Greg …nothing is comming up
http://blinkoncrime.com/2009/03/23/haleigh-cummin…over-and-drugshaleigh-cummings-case-exclusive-misty-on-3-day-bender-with-lover-and-drugs/
Blink– WAY off topic (first, Phillip Paul, criminally insane killer taken on field trip to state fair is BACK IN CUSTODY tonite)
This is not for the forum, but I’ve kept seeing these Canadian Govt’ cheque ‘ads’ on your site and ScaredMonkeys. Dana Pretzer needs to check them out– just finished watching a Cdn documentary on this type of ‘kit’ fraud and so, for the first time ever, I decided to link to your ad. That took me to some guy’s site, then I linked one further, and it is the fraud site– well, the RCMP and the Cdn govt are aware and concerned. It links to NYC Voxcel who wouldn’talk to the documentary reporters, it also links to a call center giving an office location as California, and then it also goes to England, to an address that does not exist.
If you like, I’ll look up the doc webpage– I haven’t seen it before, it’s new, called 16:9 (sixteen by 9).
Those ads want people to sign up to get a ‘kit’, they have deceptive (according to govt and RCMP) practices and confusing ‘small print’. People never get a kit, but they get billed on their credit cards with no hope of refund when they don’t get the product,
Not complaining– I’m not going to get caught on this scheme, but maybe Dana would like to check it out. Apparently ‘Grants Money’ used to have a photo of Cdn prime minister on their banner ad, but the gov’t didn’t like that so now it’s got the Toronto CN tower and a female photo instead.
As soon as I saw it was indeed, ‘Grants Money’, I got out of there fast. Apparently they have difficult to trace real addresses, several web addresses etc.
Want info if I find it on the documentary?
AGAIN not for posting as a comment– here is the info site on the documentary, it’s a ‘Global News’ (credible– very) site from Canada. http://news.globaltv.com/programs/16×9/index.html
“It’s the web site that claims to grant wishes, but many Canadians claim it’s just digital deception. 16:9 investigates the online operation that appeared to have the Prime Minister’s endorsement, but isn’t even run from this country! See who’s behind this mystery site, and why the grants it claims to provide are costing Canadians.”
Program video is there too. (maybe share with Dana?)
vidda, one of the local news sites said the water was drained and search was completed– how’s that for fast! I wouldn’t believe they can actually search 5 acres of muck visually and say it’s cleared just because the bottom can be seen. News reports were very confusing if you take the info literally! Have to wait and see, but we do know it’s the ‘L’ pond for sure now.
randie #65
listen to the voice analysis of misty conducted in august
http://www.firstcoastnews.com/video/default.aspx?playerId=newsmaker&maven_playlistId=6d956fb18503371af2eeca8d1349a6209a152994&maven_referrer=mrss&maven_referralPlaylistId=6d956fb18503371af2eeca8d1349a6209a152994&maven_referralObject=1231220760
it has tidbits like this:
(TJ Ward: …Let’s go back and talk about Tommy and Joe.)
OK. Joe is psycho. He has problems really bad problems he molested me when I was a little girl too. He’s molested my little cousin at five years old.
(TJ Ward: Do you have another brother named Joe?
Misty: Nope that’s my cousin.
TJ Ward: That’s your cousin? Misty: Yup. TJ Ward: Tell me about him.)
He’s crazy. He’s got mental problems. I’m telling you he’s got mental problems, and he’s got them bad. When he was down here, he was only down here for a couple of wee]ks…..and he come to visit everybody. He come to visit my family. And you know we didn’t think of anything, I know I would be safe because I’m around everybody. If I was by myself with him, then I wouldn’t be around him.
(TJ Ward: Tell me about the van.)
…my younger brother wakes up probably about maybe 12:30-1:00 in the morning. And he didn’t see Joe on his bed where he usually sleeps at. So he didn’t think anything, you know he thought maybe he was in the back bedroom using the phone like he always is talking on the phone. [So he went back to sleep. The next morning the van's moved in a different spot]. The keys are in a different spot…
…Joe usually sleeps in his boxers. He slept in his pants and sox and a shirt. [Then there's the big scratch on the side of the] van…
Misty Cummings:
I had, I’m mean just because of the scratch. I mean, why would there be any scratch? Why would there be, you know, why would the van be moved?
I went to um, [the Sheriff's office the next day to go talk to him]. Well Joe and my mom, they come and pick me up from the Sheriff’s office…
…and Joe was [scared to even come down there to get his stuff. As soon as immediately that this happened he wanted to leave State. He come and got him a ride out as soon as it happened.
============
She also talks about a red truck her brother tim sold quickly after haleigh went missing.
misty under hypnosis also mentions an a.c. guy who was there that day
http://www.firstcoastnews.com/video/default.aspx?playerId=newsmaker&maven_playlistId=6d956fb18503371af2eeca8d1349a6209a152994&maven_referrer=mrss&maven_referralPlaylistId=6d956fb18503371af2eeca8d1349a6209a152994&maven_referralObject=1229749681
Has anyone else heard of the “Speculation” that a car was the “searching” target under the water and it was found???? So much speculation out there.
Also, all thru the day I can’t quite get out of my mind Misty and “taking the little girl with her” partying. Why would someone do this?
1. Misty had “alterior” motivs.
2. The little girl woke up (or had never gone to bed—- pumped up from pop and candy), and wanted to go with Misty when she realized she was leaving. Misty “bribes” her with more pop and candy to be quite and not to tell. This may seem strange but the whole scenario is strange.
Let’s say for argument sake she took her partying. So what could have happened??????
#1. Since Misty had alterior motives—-the child is gone.
#2. There was an accident, the child drowns.
#3. Misty is hapving fun, and when it is time to go home…..the child is missing—-abducted.
Well, in any scenario…….. if “I” was a 17 year old kid and any one of these happened I would never go home. I would run and run and run and never look back.
That is just one more reason I feel she left the children home alone in Misty’s bed, and when she returned from partying 2-2:30 am she sees the little girl is gone. She may have went to move her to her own little bed and realized she was “not” there. Sheer panic runs thru her blood. Remember “she” never called the police. Only Ronald did after he returned home from work.
Also in another post, someone brought to our attention that it is a 35 mile drive from trailer to pond, but it is “not” that far from water access from pond to trailer.
I would still like to know more about a van, keys and scratch on this van. It is my understanding k9 team hit at the water behind her home, I am of the opinion whatever happened to this baby, she was removed via boat.
B
What does anyone else know about a Mr. Moffit (spelling) writing Ronald out a check for 35,000.00???? Someting about the fact that if Ronald had the 35 thousand then he could locate his daughter or at least her where abouts. When a Mr. Moffitt heard about this he right away wrote him out a check. This is all new to me. Does anyone else know?????
And Ronald is not dumb if in reality he keeps his friends close but his enemies closer………………hmmmmmmmm……
Have to wonder if little Haleigh DID get out and accidentally drown behind the trailer there where the dogs hit and was brought by Misty and whoever helped her to this L-shaped pond to get rid of the evidence? So many possibilities and none of them very good.
#76 by Randie
Here is link talking about the $35,000.
http://www.bloggernews.net/122100
Blink, if Haleigh were removed by boat, clearly they didn’t end up by boat at the ‘L’ pond, but there are many other choices it seems, looking at that river. And why take her back to ‘land’, go by vehicle, that makes little sense if the idea were not to find evidence ever. And how to arrange a ‘boat’ after the fact only to cover up (whose boat, where normally kept, why brought to the scene) unless a boat was ‘convenient’, as if someone arrived by boat, or normally came and left the area by boat. Or the family had a boat moored somewhere nearby.
Easy access down lane areas to the river for sure.
Brenda, but Haleigh was afraid of the dark.
Kleat, I forgot about that. I fear the truth is going to be uglier than any of us imagine. With Misty being a victim of molestation herself…the victims DO tend to have an odd attachment to their violators in some cases. Makes me wonder why/who she’s truly covering for other than herself if that’s the case. I mean…if Melissa Huckabee can do what she did (another victim of molestation I am certain), what could Misty truly be capable of????
Anyone notice how Misty spoke about Haleigh at the start of her last stress test/polygraph? Her comment of Haleigh needing different set of clothes for the day– not in what Misty said, by her expressions and voice as she said Haleigh needed to wear different clothes. Just something in her attitude about Haleigh insisting she HAD to wear different clothes and they had to go all the way somewhere else to get that.
I wonder what happened to those particular clothes worn at school that day, and if that fueled a fight with Haleigh later that day, at least on the part of a disgruntled Misty, that carried over from morning.
And on the face of it, looking after other children as a sitter for a few hours would help the family income so why a fight about it when something might work out really well for a job for Misty? Unless those children wouldn’t be cared for properly– and possibly exposed to things and people they should not be exposed to.
reg 73 – Sue ..
Few things really bother me from this interview with MIsty .First – she is not making up any of the details for Joe thnat night – sleeping with clothes on ; scratches on the van and speedy leaving the states…I am not a cap in any capacity but I do think she says the truth about Joe …
Another thing linked to same cosin Joe – her mom was with her when she left the Police station..Misty said , he molested her as little girl..Why in the world is this idiot allowed again to get close to MIsty ? whats wrong with the whole picture – he kept visiting..I do have sons, no daughters but how about some parenting reflex here to protect your kid ?
sorry, I meant – her mom was with him – same Joe
Kleat, I have to wonder if Misty was simply jealous of the love Ron had for Haleigh? We can see Casey Anthony is all about her and Caylee was in the way. Same situation maybe? I’m beginning to wonder if the perp was none other than Misty herself and no one else other than her. Only difference is someone may have helped her dispose of evidence (like the body) where I’m sure Casey Anthony acted alone.
Man, my mind is coming up with some not so nice scenarios. If dogs hit on scent near the water/on the dock near the trailer, wonder if Misty drown Haleigh herself? Would also explain the need to dry clothes quickly. Lord, this is as bad as Caylee Anthony in wondering to much about the little child’s fate!
If Haleigh is gone then I would prefer to think that Misty was determined to get her fix so she drugged the children to sleep. That is the only way I could imagine the little one going to sleep at 8:00 after sleeping all morning and having an afternoon nap.
She could have left by 8:30, partied and been back by 11:00 or 12:00,
found out the child overdosed, and died in her sleep thereby releasing her bladder. This would account for the child wetting the bed (something she no longer did) and the switching of sleeping locations.
That is about as far as I have figured and is probably wrong but it’s the kindest death that I can imagine given the unsavory characters involved.
#82 by Kleat,
Kleat, I totally agree, I think the statement about the clothes is very telling!! Misty’s attitude about this was nasty at best, I didn’t like it one bit. She also repeated this word for word during her Hypnosis session with the same bad attitude, same facial expressions…obviously, Misty was not happy about this & I have to wonder was this the reason for the fight between Misty & Ron that night? When Misty was recalling what happened that morning before school about the clothes, I could see how annoyed she was after 7 months so I can only imagine how angry she must have been then. The fact that Ron would go to all the trouble to go to another town to get clothes before school when she had clothes to wear, sounds like he would do anything for his little girl & I see Misty being extremely jealous when talking about this…so I think this is huge & may have everything to do with Haleigh’s disappearance! I also wonder why this story didn’t come out before, is this the first time Misty’s told this story or did I miss something? I’m afraid Haleigh was in her way because she was daddy’s little girl & Misty couldn’t handle being 2nd.
Hopefully—-if Misty is right that some folks think they saw Haleigh being taken away in a red truck, and that her brother Timothy sold his red truck right after Haleigh went missing—the police have tracked down the truck and gone over it thoroughly, as it sounds like they did with the white van (again, based on what Misty said in that voice stress analysis tape).
I still don’t think that she had a direct hand in the kid’s disappearance (or perhaps I just hope she didn’t), but it sure seems like a relative of hers could have. Or a boyfriend, depending on what was going on at the trailer that led to the couch bouncing, as junior reported hearing along with the squeaking shoes.
Randie, while it’s true Misty didn’t call the police, she says she discovered Haleigh missing at 3 something and that Ron got home at 3:24, so she easily could have been frantically searching for 24 minutes (and inexplicably making the bed, if it’s true that Ron said it had not been slept in).
There are a whole bunch of things that don’t make good sense going on right now. There are folks who claim that White BOy Greg’s mug shot showed up on the Sheriff’s web site for a brief time this weekend, then disappeared. This whole pond thing is crazy: why drain a pond (huge expense) and then not do a real search? Why do a possibly destructive line search in the deep water: unless you have already found the major item you were searching for? TO me that says something was found earlier while they were denying it was a Haleigh related search. LE is not telling the family anything because the family is now clearly involved.(?) SPeculation abounds that the brother is in protective custody, as he was the recipient of the decapitated rat found in his mailbox a couple weeks ago. Regarding the dirty clothes in the dryer: was a laundry basket found in the trailer that first night? Don’t I remember a pile of clothes on the floor, too? It would be exactly the right size and shape to transport a 5 year old child… And yes, the tracking dogs followed a scent along a path that deadended at the river. What does anybody know about TIm Miller coming back soon to search the woods around the pond?
I can confirm the pic thing happened. I have the images. I did not post them as the reason for it is unconfirmed.
B
Caught a few minutes of Gramma Neves on NG tonight, and she wasn’t going for anyone telling her that Haleigh couldn’t have missed her brother knocking on the door, she had many excuses why tired 17 year old would have been sleeping at around 10 when someone was knocking on the door and no one answered. Neves would have none of the idea, that Haleigh could have heard that or been awake, as she had been up too much in recent nights to stay awake or be awakened by anyone at that time of night.
Then watching the http://blinkoncrime.com/category/haleigh-cummings/ ‘Snakes and Hogpens’ video, and did I notice wrong at the beginning, where Neves was not looking at Cobra Staubs as he spoke with her? Surely looked like she was not making any eye contact with him as he leaned against the door, she appeared to be facing the windshield, not looking to his direction.
Just strange and her taking off like that, but she apparently spent 4 hours wandering around those woods, but had not seen the children’s swings in that area because she ‘hadn’t been there before’. Then she was gone.
Why is she protecting Haleigh when this is her granddaughter, her SON’S daughter, who is missing??
…protecting ‘Misty’…. meant to write
Neves said the children would have more likely been wakened by someone knocking, not Misty. But if children were in the bed with Misty,why wouldn’t she be wakened by one or both of them, with banging on the door?
Per Misty
They went back to sleep after taking Haleigh to school until about noon, Ron picks up Haleigh because jr is napping at three something in the afternoon, and then kids go to sleep at 8 o’clock. What 4 year old goes to sleep at 8 after that schedule?
#92 kleat…I’m with you on that, Neves is suspicious, the way she defended misty from the start! Heck, on thee 911 call ron himself called misty out!
Am I missing something here? I must be way out of the loop. What knocking, what banging on a door??? And I still don’t understand where a van, keys and a scratch on the van info is.
Blink:
If the child was “carried” to the waterline from the back door — would a K-9 still pick of the child scent? Or does the child have to “walk” on the ground to the waterline for the dog to pick up her scent?????
Suz, I agree with you that once Misty realized Haleigh was missing she franticaly looked for her. Maybe as said before Misty (being a teen) didn’t have the common sense to call 911. Or………maybe she felt the culprit would return Haleigh and she just sat it out.
I watched the video on NG tonight and DID see a laundry basket full of clothes? it is next to a dresser.
I didnt save the link however but if it is important I can try to find it and post it?
I do believe that they found some type of evidence also to empty this pond.
I was wondering myself about Tommy saying he went to Rons house to check to see if Misty was there and was wondering why this just NOW came up? and I am also wondering if Ron’s lawyer is telling the truth?
I guess I am losing my liar radar or something just isn’t right here.
I am REALLY wanting to believe that this grandma is nothing like KCs mom and I hope she is Sure in defending Misty.
I believe that only a few believe that I do believe that Misty left and someone did take Haleigh like in a SO and she just don’t want to tell Ron that she was not home.
I don’t think Misty is close to KC in her master manipulation techniques but heck maybe it is a copy cat case? who knows at this point?
Just an opinion but I have always felt that Misty is telling the truth concerning her account of that night. Her brother put himself at the “right time and place”, the mobile home where Haleigh disappeared from. Now, why would he do that? He would have to be telling the truth about going over there that night. I believe Misty really was exhausted that night and was sleeping really hard. I also believe that one or two people came to the mobile home and possibly Haleigh answered the door. Somehow, that night…someone or somebody took her. Misty’s brother knew from Ron’s phone call that Misty wasn’t answering the phone. I think he went over there that night, either by himself or with one other person and took that child. I really do…WHO WOULD PUT THEMSELVES AT THE SCENE OF THE CRIME AT THAT TIME, IF IT WASN’T TRUE? My common sense tells me she was taken from her home. I think Misty’s brother is very SUSPISCIOUS!
Man oh man I need to read NG transcripts beforeeeeeee I post. Also I did manage to find a little something on a blue van and a scratch but it was a small article. But, am still curious on the dog picking up the child’s scent at the waterline…(being carried or would she have to walk herself)….?
Kleat, Ms. Neves has a case of Scamanthonyitist or is it Denialitist?