Caylee/Casey Anthony Case: Brad Conway Releasing New Evidence

Posted by BOC Staff | Brad Conway,Casey Anthony,Caylee Anthony Case,Cindy Anthony,Dominick Casey,George Anthony,Mark Nejame,Tot Mom | Wednesday 30 September 2009 8:52 am

Orlando, FL– Brad Conway, attorney for George and Cindy Anthony vows to release evidence during an 11 am press conference today in his office that raise “serious questions about this case”.

Conway

Following the release of the lastest round of discovery, Conway announced there were items that were supposed to be released by the State Attorney’s office yesterday, that were not.

Since Mr. Conway has no legal standing to release anything on behalf of the State Attorney’s office, it is surmised such information was supplied by his clients, George and Cindy. George and Cindy Anthony were previously represented by Orlando attorney Mark Nejame.

Check back to blinkoncrime.com for updates  

Related Posts:

320 Comments

  1. vidda says:

    Florida state should make example of Casey Anthony and punish her severly so many other wack jobs out there know NOT to touch little kids…This familly is sickening in any way .I hope they get obstruction charges for all manipulation and lies …Hats down to Yuri and his team – the thruth will prevail

  2. vidda says:

    How long before decision on today’s defense motions?

  3. Todd in Tulsa says:

    Well, how quaint. Here you have Conway doing Baez’s dirty work. I didn’t think Conway was tied to this directly. I would think, unless or until Cindy and George are charged, which, God willing, they will be, but until then, Conway has no right to get involved in this murder case, does he?

  4. Kleat says:

    Todd, don’t worry, they are just freaking out– Cindy’s hands are tied as far as her own version of ranting to media, and there’s just not enough gum in the corner store to take the edge off anymore.

  5. westsidehudso says:

    This will not be popular, but if in any way the prosecution, or any agents there of, such as police, released information that couldn’t be substantiated by way of scientific testing, and if they did so knowingly, realizing that the results were not consistent with popular belief and what has been represented (even though the group here largely believes that Casey is guilty of something), then I say shame on them.

    They have a strong enough circumstantial case without muddying the waters. The system should not be manipulated. I do not want to see this type of cloud over the judicial system. In other words, follow the letter of the law, when it comes to the seemingly guilty , but especially with those that might be innocent, which is EVERYONE, presumably.

    This does not mean that I have changed my personal opinion about Casey Anthony’s involvement. Far from it. My opinion is that she should be prosecuted on the strongest evidence, which has less to do with science, and more to do with common sense and circumstantial evidence.

    That said, unless the grand jury indictment teetered on science, the case will move forward. The last presser did not advance any idea of innocence, but rather moved forward an argument regarding free speech, which doesn’t hurt anyone.

    As to the continuing investigations in PR, please see my prior post # 29. It would take no time to determine if “flag girl” was in the USA or FL during the time period of the murder or death. Casey Anthony looks no more innocent, in fact, only the labs look less proficient, which is something we should address.

    Brad Conway has stepped into a stickywicket. He must consider his loyalties and how they might affect him, regardless of his heart.

    Lastly,(but not guaranteed), we have not seen final scientific reports from the FBI.

    WHY didn’t she admit to an accident when she had the chance?

    Bravo, Brilliant, the last line will resonate. Like a fleeting thought, surrendered to the favor of the iron bars parting like the red sea. The dayscream is eclipsed by the longshadow of truth. ( insert sound of her clanking chains of yesteryear)
    Sorry to be all Greek Tragedy on you, but it is appropos.
    B

  6. dddeerma says:

    Peggy: I beg to differ. None of this is a huge problem, nor does it change in any way the State’s case against Casey. They had her on murder 1 before the remains were found. A Grand Jury had sufficient evidence to allow the charges. Sometimes parts of the evidence cannot be processed without losing other parts. Tiny DNA contamination can happen in many ways. What was important was that it is known DNA. Baez and friends have no choice but to attack the professionalism of the various LE agencies. There is no evidence, not one piece that points to anyone but Casey. She had the only motive to murder Caylee. Her family were frantic; she didn’t want to deal with LE. With no more evidence than there is, I would have to find her guilty. (me =reasonable, normal person…)

  7. Kleat says:

    Brad needs to engage brain (and invest a little time) before releasing tongue and making a big deal about a hair on the duct tape– someone told him that and he went with it apparently. Talk about misinformation!

    Careful please, Mr. Conway. (now could the source be your own Mr. and Mrs. George Anthony?). Maybe a lawyer can just use clients words without thinking for him or herself?

    Seems a bit of a rush on this latest, but it did what it was designed to do.

    Of course, tape with a fabric support, will have degraded in the months of humid, even soaked conditions, as Bill Schaeffer points out– so the fibres from a new or unused, unexposed tape roll, will be different than those of the weathered pieces. Brad is comparing two oranges from the same tree, one green and kept in the fridge, the other ripened, fallen from the tree and exposed to wet, submerged conditions and heat for a period of time. That does not mean they did not come from the same tree even within the same growing season.

  8. Kleat says:

    Anyone notice Blink’s choice of photo of the ‘trio’? Much easier to view, for one thing, than Domi’s full face mug, but aside from that, George follows behind Brad, as if the chair and lawyer act as armour so reporters beware– yield or else! Most notable is the distant Cindy, trailing behind, highly unusual pose– like I said, a bit easier to look at.

  9. Kleat says:

    oh oh… tried to post a link to the legal analyst questioning tactics re: my post 50. You’ll have to find that for yourself.

  10. NGfromBoston says:

    #29—While I agree with your sentiments in the post—didn’t Cindy have Caylee’s remains cremated? May be a moot point but I always was suspicious of this—why cremation? Was there something to hide?

    That poor baby…..my heart breaks for her

  11. BEES KNEES says:

    What do you guys make of her body outline in a fetal position? If that’s true it rules out drowing to me. I could be wrong but my thinking is if Caylee drowned whether accidental or intentional, wouldn’t she just put her in the trunk ~ her body being straight or maybe just in a heap. I don’t know how long it would take rigor mortis to set in but I can’t see Casey positioning her body into a fetal position, so if Caylee did herself she was obviously alive at the time. Know what I mean?

  12. joan (Canada) says:

    Is anyone really surprised by Conway’s statements today. Cindy was probably so p…off at the state’s doc. dump. You know the Anthony’s have to be front and center at all times. This is all about them and Casey, certainly not about Caylee.

    I want whatever Cindy is taking in order to be still looking for a live Caylee. Joking aside, they had a memorial for Caylee, apparently they have ashes of her in jewellry. Why did they go ahead if they did not think this was Caylee.

    Do they not see how sick they appear, everytime they come out in the public’s attention. The last time George looked like a fool, bursting into Mr. Nejame’s office.

    I cannot believe that the GJ put the death penalty back on the table unless they had real evidence in their hands, although we may not know about it until the trial or slightly before.

    Lol, at the audacity of Cindy thinking she can shut down website’s that are mean to her or her daughter.

    Scary too, that she would taint and throw under the bus anybody that was in contact with Casey. This woman is a very scary person and I hope more people sue for defamation of character.

    Someone has to put a stop to this crazy person. I really feel she has gone over the edge.

  13. csidedreamer says:

    so maybe she used a different duct tape – not from home. So maybe it wasnt touched enough to collect a finger print. That’s not enough to throw a murder charge out the window & drop everything. Am I missing something ? it doesn’t seem like anything earth shattering here- accept that stain shaped like a child in fetal position! – thats down right disturbing. Was not a pizza box Im sure.

  14. Kleat says:

    csidedreamer, the tape fibres, that’s inside the support layer (not the adhesive layer), would be ‘degraded’ from months under water and out in the weather. The ‘unused’ roll fibres would be in different condition– this does not mean this is a different tape. The chemistry of the adhesive was the same, the tape could be defined specifically to the type of rare tape.

    Now, Conway is saying it’s not the same because the fibres are different– well, yeah!

  15. Todd in Tulsa says:

    What is mind-boggling is, if Conway and Bozo has all of this evidence, I am at a loss as to understand why they’re not presenting their “evidence” to the judge, or the state in order to get a bail hearing. Instead, they are trying to sway public opinion by appealing to the masses. Actions speak louder than words Conway!

    I do believe you have answered your own quagmire Todd.
    B

  16. Kleat says:

    I’m confused– what happened to the motion to dismiss the whole case against Casey because of spoliation? Because now we have the motion to dismiss only part of the case against Casey? Did the judge deal with the first motion already and this follows, or is this a replacement with a compromise, or, is it just giving the judge some more options?

    Confusing that the two co-exist. It seems if you want the whole thing dropped, you don’t then make a different ‘offer’.

    Motion to Dismiss Counts I and II of the indictment against Casey Marie Anthony link:
    http://www.wesh.com/download/2009/0930/21161896.pdf

  17. artgal16 says:

    If the Ants dont believe Caylee is dead and they cremated those remains then I believe criminal charges could be filed against them for tampering with evidence in what could conceivably be another crime against a child. I dont believe for a minute that wasnt Caylee but someone needs to call them on this and let them have it for this little scheme of trying to cast doubts on Caylee being dead. They cant have it both ways. LE has been very lenient as far as the Anthonys are concerned but I highly doubt that would have been so in
    a low profile case. If the Ants thought by releasing this informaton today would bring them sympathy from what I have read here and at other blogs – it has had the opposite effect. The Ants have a curious
    personality disorder that seems to keep them from realizing just how
    their actions fuel peoples dislike.

  18. Kleat says:

    artgal, desperate acts make the situation worse for their daughter, seems to me anyway. Baffling behaviours.

  19. gloriadelamanana says:

    It’s quite obvious. They created “Big Headlines” today for no other reason than to put doubt on all the states evidence. What perfect timing… right as two motions are filed to try to get the worst charges against the princess removed. Noticed how some of the posters are losing faith in the justice system. Is their “Spin” working? What is the reason that Brad did this? Would not look real good for the defense to do it would it? Then they could be accused of trying to taint a potential jury pool, when they are asking for a change of venue. So enter Brad C. He’s reliabe, honest, right? speaking on behalf of his clients who feel that thier daughter has no chance of a fair trial? These people have lied, obstructed justice and tried their best through media to try to taint the public as well as any potential jury pool. They actually scare me. The thing that scares me is, they will go to any extreme and throw whoever it may be under the bus to try to save their daughter. To say they are looking for an alive Caylee is beyond words. The finger points to no one other than their daughter and they know it. It is really getting SCARY to see just how far they are willing to go. Please don’t be fooled by these actions. It only means their “SPIN” is working. Right now, they need whatever they can get. If they can get the public convinced that the FBI makes too many mistakes, wouldn’t that be grand? I’m just appauled.

  20. Kleat says:

    What happens to ‘victims statements’ in a case such as this? Grandparents as victims in this case, would be only re-victimized by a guilty verdict, victimized further with any sentence of life, the worst victimization would be death for their own daughter. They, in their logic, might want to argue that no further victimization could be done to the baby but that the sentence would only serve to cause more harm, the more penalty of the sentence, the more harm to those who are already victims.

    That is all true, so who would speak to a child as a victim in this? Is there a role for victim’s impact statements by the family members who survive this crime?

  21. Kleat says:

    ‘WHAT HAVE YOU DONE?!!’ Lee said were Cindy’s words to Casey as she entered the room where Lee was talking to his sister.

  22. BrendaT says:

    55 WSH I haven’t read everything but applaud your post which says it all!! Back to reaing

  23. BrendaT says:

    Another stray thought and I’ll go back to my cave. Lawyers act on instructions received from their clients. Often they don’t agree with the approach. In such cases generally they document the position they personally advised and set out the reasons which militate against the course of action the clients have instructed them to take. When the breaking point comes they withdraw. Sometimes b/c the client does not take advice and sometimes less is said or another reason offered. I’ve never been a fan of Conway but we should not assume he is not doing is job in the background unknownst to us.

  24. claudia says:

    Oh Please, I can believe what I am hearing in this news
    confrence:

    1. No ONE SHOULD MAKE JUDGEMENTS.
    2. Does this include the Anthonys?
    3. Have they not passed Judgement on all law enforcement
    that has anything at all to do with this case.
    4. Have then not passed JUDGEMENT on all media outlets,
    websits, volunteers, bailbonds, crime labs, and judges.
    5 Maybe Brad should have told them to practic what
    they want him to preach.
    6. Little Caylee, just keep walking with the sunshine upon
    your face, and you won’t see the shadow of doubt your
    nana is trying to leave behind. We are here for you
    we will be your voice, this we promise you!

  25. Peggy says:

    Peggy -

    Just scanning through the posts but wanted to respond to your post about Baez requesting all of the info on the techs and lab procedures. Don’t want to poke your balloon with a pen but that would pretty much be standard operating procedure in any case with forensic evidence. Any defense attorney would ask for those things just as I’m sure the state will look at the records for any expert the state wants to use. It’s not some AHA moment by Baez.

  26. TandT says:

    I am not surprised that the Anthony’s are doing this. They are totally hypocritical and totally covering for their daughters actions.
    We have questions about some DNA from a strand of hair? Perhaps if Cindy had given the police the correct brush we would not have this problem. But hey, that’s what they were counting on right?? The Anthonys want to state evidence wasn’t handled correctly. Yet they are the ones who with held evidence. Cleaned a car that had a stain of a child, washed clothes that were probably covered with death. Washed a knife that was in the car. Probably never gave correct knife to police in the end either. Had time to clean everything up and make up all the cover stories. All to protect their daughter. It is clear that rules do not apply to them. They expect everyone to do the right thing except themselves. In the end, if Casey does get away with murder, what has she learned? What have her parents learned? They have sold their souls and will reap their efforts one way or another. Very disturbing and sad. How do they live with their selves? I haven’t a clue.

  27. suz says:

    I’ve thought all along that this case is the state’s to blow, and, well… are they blowing it? Not sure. Kind of, maybe. Godnoze our friends at the FBI are not helping.

    I know everyone here is more than ready to stick her head in the guillotine and pull the cord themselves, but it seems to me there’s stll a whole lot the state can’t prove: how caylee died, where caylee died, when caylee died for starters. How do you prove murder when you don’t know those things?

    If I’m on the jury and you are shrieking at me “but she lied! she partied! and she lied!”—I’m not sure that’s enough for me to send a young woman to her death.

    Not yet buying into the “hey, does this taco look like Jesus?” stain. The mind is programmed to look for patterns, making them up much of the time.

    Wouldn’t it be a trip if she didn’t do it? (seems like kind of a long shot, but, wow, that would be a wild plot twist)

    Although I respect and “get you”, and well, valid questions, There is zero doubt for me Casey killed Caylee.
    B

  28. Kleat says:

    suz, but there is a way to explain the stain– like bacterial/fungal ‘tide marks’. Moisture builds up under the plastic bagging and humidifies it, probably a lot in places, more where more pressure, so a body could create pressure points and the pattern would reflect the shape and weight distribution. The bacteria and fungal action would also reflect the shape and weight. (at least that’s how I understand the explanation– ever put something in a clear polyethelene bag, put it out on a the ground, then pick it up hours later– the bottom can be dripping as if what was inside had leaked, but it had not)

  29. lily says:

    #75 PEGGY

    How is Peggy responding to Peggy? These posts seem awfully strange.

    I think if your referring to the don’t look now there are going to be fingerprints that will be non-prints anyway post, I think you can expect more of that in the future. Embrace it, I happen to think the destruction of the residue in the “latent lift” extraction process was a strategic choice. Happens all the time. Kinney Baden is not requesting the free world CV’s because nothing was found, imo.
    B

  30. Kleat says:

    BrendaT, maybe Brad had to bow to Cindy pressure– you do it or I’ll hit the air again and send George ranting in the background.

  31. Mari says:

    Wasn’t able to get any reading done while at work today…just finished watching Brad’s presser.

    How embarrassing for him. That’s all I gotta say.

    I felt the same way. Like he was ambushed, it was uncomfortable to watch. How sad one of the few people in this case whose heart I believe is really in the right place is becoming another Baez casualty.
    B

  32. debwv says:

    If people gonna believe this crap. Then tell me about the 31 days,if Cindy didn’t find her.How much longer would you wait to report Caylee missing.It wouldn’t of happened,IMO she wa planning on Jumping the state!!!

  33. ada says:

    Suz,
    I don’t know who is directing this latest spin cycle, but what if Casey were found not guilty? Casey moves back home with her parents who know what she did to Caylee. Much of what transpired today seems to be just a continuation of what the Anthonys do when Casey is in trouble. Can you imagine what life in the Anthony household will be like if Casey returns? These don’t seem to be people that have learned anything from past mistakes. It might be the ultimate karma.

  34. artgal16 says:

    In answer somewhat to post #77 – I can only say that this child didnt kill herself. Someone is responsible for her death. If you were on the jury I wouldnt be screaming Casey lied, yes she lied to everyone
    but she also from June 16th on lived her life as if she never had a child. Is this now a society where children can be tossed like trash in a heap and left for the elements to break down their body and the animals to eat their flesh without any consequences? Are we to believe it was an accident & that for whatever reason the mother whose charge the child was in could shrug it off and continue on with her life without an after thought? It this now the new norm? To question to such a degree what is so evident that the proving of it should be extremely easy, if it werent for the spins, lies and loophole lawyers looking for any way to get their guilty client off and by any means including throwing suspicion upon her innocent friends. If this is so, then we are in a society gone mad for this case is extremely simple. There is not one scintilla of proof that anyone else in the entire world had anything to do with Caylees death except her mother -without a shadow of a doubt, she killed this child. Be in DNA from a tech, or duct tape that has disintegrated due to wear from weather, lies told by Cindy and George and lawyers tricks of subterfuge to downright lies, nothing will change that fact.

  35. NancyS says:

    Blink,
    I would NEVER challenge you but what makes you so sure that Casey IS THE ONE that killed the angel?

    You are welcome to challenge me at any time, friend, as is anyone of course, I believe the evidence will show Casey Anthony’s prints on the duct tape around this baby girl’s head placed there very quickly after her death. Her conciousness of guilt is overwhelming. I believe the soil samples in the yard will yield decomp and or Caylee’s DNA. I believe the combination of physical evidence, overwhelming circumstantial evidence, and the evidence we are not yet privy to will prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Casey Anthony is reponsible for the death of her daughter.
    B

  36. bluewillow says:

    I just have to think it was not a simple accident (drowning in the pool) and the body was not in any condition for paramedics to see, or how on earth can you explain all of the bizarreness since?

    Is there any limit to the anthony’s craziness?? are they incapable of shame?

  37. ChicagoJudy says:

    Does anyone know when the next hearing is? Other than one in January re the ZFG suit, I haven’t heard anything else. Thanx.

    Also curious where Silver and Maura are these last couple of days….

  38. westsidehudson says:

    #59 I didn’t mean the judicial system, last PM. I meant justice, court system **
    I was on a roll!

    #60_NGfromBoston — I would think that since they had the remains ‘in limbo’ for some extended time, especially with the Anthony’s denial issues, that they would have done their own DNA testing prior to cremation. Why would they not have if there was this immense distrust of the authorities since the beginning? I Believe that they did do their own tests, of course that is my opinion and not based on any specific knowledge.

    #61-If that outline means anything, and it is nothing but conjecture, (I couldn’t personally see it); had Caylee been carried with arms under her legs, the legs would move forward and inward like the fetal position.

    #77-Suz I wouldn’t want to be on any jury where I was responsible for putting someone to death( maybe with the exception of torturers / serial killers) so I can relate to you. I’m not sure that this is a death penalty case. But none of us has heard a narrative about why the prosecution came to that decision.

    I never felt that the duct tape was very strong evidence in the first place. Even if it were a rare duct tape, it still wouldn’t have been impossible for anyone else to buy the same type of tape. So it could have been argued without the newer revelations. On the flip side, someone from the same household could also purchase or use another roll of duct tape.

    As to the evidence in the car, the lack of it sure does demonstrate that whoever did ‘it’ had some excellent cleaning skills.

  39. Gavriella says:

    Pardon my ignornance, and bear with me a bit as I’m yet in the fog of an ebbing migraine, but isn’t it rather common and expected, in death penalty cases, that the nearer the case gets to trial, motions to dismiss are filed? Isn’t this standard procedure, no matter how meager or grand the evidences presented as the basis to dismiss, if even so that the accused can’t, at some later date, claim misrepresentation, obtain a new trial and sue the pants off of his/her attorneys? And isn’t this beginning to look more and more like O’Jay, with the exception to the fact that there is no glove that doesn’t fit, it all fits and quite beautifully, I might add, no matter how circumstantial, and no matter how bungling a few of the investigators. We might also take heart in the fact that should there be a single fingerprint on a piece of tape that print is available and quite probably, indisputable. Regardless, the facts remain, uncontested:

    1. Casey Anthony was the last known person to have seen and had possession of her daughter.

    2. Casey Anthony made no attempts to locate her missing daughter.

    3. Casey Anthony did not contact any authority nor family member nor friend to either report her daughter missing nor to ask for assistance in finding her for an entire month.

    4. Casey Anthony admitted that her daughter was missing only after the car had been located and returned to the Anthony’s residence smelling of death, which was admitted by Cindy, right off the bat, to dispatch, when she initially called 911, and thereafter admitted by George who went into great detail during police questioning as to the stench in the car, to include having to crack the windows, in spite of the rain, as I recall, to make driving the car bearable.

    5. Computer searches have turned up such hard evidences as Casey’s searches for methods by which one might imcompacitate or otherwise murder a child.

    6. It is a known fact that evidences, contained within the car, were destroyed prior to the authorities being notified. It is no wonder then that there were no fibers in the trunk of the car that matched fibers found at the crime scene. There is still that matter of the laundry bags, the T-shirt, shorts, blanket, etc. etc. that were recovered and determined to have come from the Anthony home.

    7. The credibility of all of the Anthony’s has been shot to hell through their numerous and repeated lies which are beyond provable, and too numerous to list.

    8. Motive may have been established, or at least suggested, via one of the emails, to Amy I think it was, in which Casey referred to her daughter as a brat and wasn’t this regarding, or didn’t this elude to Caylee interferring with her mother’s ability to do as she pleased?

    9. There’s also one final video of Caylee, sitting upon her great-grandfather’s lap, at the nursing home. This one really gets to me because in it Caylee appears most anxious and weary, as well as clingy, to her grandfather, while looking forward, as though into the camera, though I believe it was Casey she was looking so warily toward, not once smiling and even appearing to be a bit frightened, and weren’t there dark circles under her eyes then too? I’d have to refer back. This is why the photographs are so important. They give us a glimpse into Caylee’s last days, according to Caylee.

    There’s so much more than duck tape and fibers. There needs to be no smoking gun, for it all stands to reason, based upon a solid circumstantial case, that no one but Casey caused the death of her daughter, who couldn’t have died but in the trunk of that car.

    We can all rest assured that the state will want to know why George and Cindy tampered with evidence inside that car PRIOR to having located Casey, when both were in agreement that the stench came from a dead body, and attested to the same during the initial hours of the investigation to authorities. The state will want to know why the O, so many lies. This case may not be as cut and dry as we would like it to be, and we might be frazzled by Brad’s latest attempt to help exonerate her, or at least to create an unreasonable, reasonable doubt, and Bozo’s attempt now to have the matter thrown out, which all do attempt to do, as such a case comes close to trial, but we have to stay focused on what will forever be the hard cold facts and the strong evidences at hand, all of which we have not yet seen. The car seat has yet to be processed. The inside of the car has yet to be processed. There was, indeed, the remains of a heart shaped sticker found at the burial scene, wasn’t there? Supported evidence to the fact that a heart shaped sticker had been placed on that tape. And if there’s a fingerprint, it remains.

    Don’t lose hope, my beloved’s. Casey’s not going anywhere for a good long time, though the death penalty may not fly.

  40. Steph says:

    Ok, Conway brought up the fabric test on the tape and that the fibers are not consistent with originating from the same source. I looked at the statement in the discovery and the list identifying the evidence.
    Q62 – Q64 is tape found on skull
    Q66 tape from residence
    Q104 tape found at scene

    Q104 is duct tape that they found in the woods at the crimescene. This could have been sitting on the ground in the woods for years. Could be totally unrelated the case. This is also the tape where they found a small sample of DNA not belonging to Casey, Caylee, or anyone in the Anthony family. This sounds to like it was just duct tape that has been in those woods well before Caylee was put there.

    My question is Q66 tape from residence… Is this a duct tape roll they found at the Anthony home? Is Q66 the duct tape found on the gas can? I have been hunting discovery to see if I can find the alphanumeric number assigned to the gas cans and duct tape strips on the gas cans.

    It bothers me that they came out at the beginnning of September stating the duct tape found on gas cans and duct tape on Caylee skull seems to originate from the same source and how rare it is. Now Conway is trying to imply with this fiber test that they don’t match?

    I am thinking the roll that was used on the gas cans and on Caylee’s skull was disposed of and wasn’t found in the house. Did LE just take a roll of duct tape found at the house that was not used on the gas cans and Caylee skull? Of course then that roll wouldn’t match.

    So is Conway trying to imply that they don’t match when in fact the duct tape on Caylee was actually linked to the house – tape on gas cans?

    Maybe Kleat, Maura, Blink, and any of the other great investigators on this site can clarify this for me.

  41. westsidehudson says:

    #35- Kleat

    “Defense files motion to ditch murder, child-abuse charges against Casey Anthony”
    Casey Anthony’s defense team filed specific motions today to have the two most serious charges against her removed — first-degree murder and aggravated child abuse.”

    I don’t see how they could dismiss the aggravated child abuse. Whether or not Casey had anything to do with Caylee’s death, she was with Caylee last and “lost her”, then never contacted police. To me, that is indicative of some serious neglect/abuse.

  42. westsidehudson says:

    # 80_Comment by Gavriella

    9. There’s also one final video of Caylee, sitting upon her great-grandfather’s lap, at the nursing home. This one really gets to me because in it Caylee appears most anxious and weary, as well as clingy, to her grandfather, while looking forward, as though into the camera, though I believe it was Casey she was looking so warily toward, not once smiling and even appearing to be a bit frightened, and weren’t there dark circles under her eyes then too? I’d have to refer back. This is why the photographs are so important. They give us a glimpse into Caylee’s last days, according to Caylee.”

    Gavriella,

    Casey didn’t take the video tape of Caylee at the nursing home. She wasn’t there. I would guess that Cindy shot the footage.

  43. vidda says:

    to Suz and anybody there who starts doubting the case-you are byuing into science fiction scenarios.You are forgetting the truth.
    I wish I can be in the Jury. Caylee was never priority in her mother’s life…Casey so busy impressing the men in her life , she had no time for this adorable litte girl..What was all these lying and stealing for- to make Casey look attractive..For Caylee – grandparents were the once who were buyng…31 days not having the kid and she didnt report her missing either.If it wasnt for Cindy’s hot flashes who knows what could have hapened.
    Do you remember how is like to have 2 year old at home ? Kids are so fragile, adorable, interesting that you dont want to leave them to somebody’s care even for a minute. The mom is their life – the air,the sun,the water – everything for 2 year old. Normal mothers would talk about their babies all the timem becasue this is the most important thing in the World for them.We arent talking about a chair or doll here so she can put aside and stop using it.This was a human dependable on this low life mother. Casey had no drive for anything in life other than men and the little girl was a hurdle. If Caylee didnt spend time with grandparents she wouldnt had never seen love in her short life.Later they betrayed her taking a wrong side again. Too many mistakes for 2 years
    A’s are too stupid and already too compromised to turn to players now.How sad they can influent poeple from these website .I will choose to believe in Blink’s position again. We shall see who is right

    Vidda-
    Please dont take this personally, everyone on here with a protagonist opinion at times makes valid points. I know it is unpopular, but this case , it’s evolution if you will, is going to take these twists and turns because human error is a fact of the evidentiary process. It is important that we evaluate that that does not necessarily make us feel great for the state, if that is your position, because it is simply reality. When we step back and weigh the totality of the evidence, I am personally confident there will be a successful prosecution in this case. Has that waned on occasion for me? Definately. Until Baby Caylee was found. Since then, never. Do I think the State has some uphill challenges? Yes. But think of it this way, they get to coast all the way down when they get to the top. I also think it helps the case to be more “appellate” proof.

    I dont think people are forgetting the truth, I think they are evaluating how that plays into evidence.
    B

  44. chitownlady says:

    Blink…..How can what this Conway doing LEGAL? He is not the atty that is defending Casey…He is (cough cough) representing gramps and grams….Where does he get off producing his own evidence? This case is really really getting outahand. At what point does this judge take any of these lawyers by the scruff of their necks and tell them TO CUT THE CRAP? I have read and watched alot of trials in my day and NEVER seen anything like this mess.Watching whats going on in this so called mess of a upcoming trial iscrazy to say the least.I for the life of me will NEVER understand how Grandma dearest and grandpa goofy can not see what the truth is. I question his (GEORGE) as a cop..What and the heck kinda of cop was he? Half-assed in my opinion. This case does not take and extra eye to see the fire burning in the trees……If this Conway has issues with evidence, why does he NOT give it to BAEZ? Afterall, he is Casey’s lawyer.Gramma dearest and keystone cop grandpa are NOT the ones going on trial…..This seems to quite the joke of a case and seems Conway (per dearest and keystone)orders are trying to CLOUD and create more and more nonsense in an already crowded field…..Isn’t there enough nonsense already…I do not understand how CONWAY can get away with this behavior….Can someone explain to me how this is allowed? maybe Flordia should to look at this trial and change their law about releasing evidence….This seems to be doing more harm then good……

    I have a question- I have not seen anyone point out yet- This “evidence” Brad released- He stated it was released to him as a courtesy from the D E F E N S E.

    Why did they not release it to the press themselves? To my knowledge, Marti Mackenzie is Baez spokesperson ( real name/real position). There is no gag order. Baez is not shy about holding Pressc ‘s at his office or front lawn. Why give it to Brad? Makes me wonder if perhaps yet another Bar complaint has been lodged against Mr. Baez for the Tony Padilla contract issue? HHHHMMMMM.
    B

  45. Gavriella says:

    Question: Why does the unidentified hair found on the duct tape have to be human? Could it not be animal hair, inasmuchas it is that animals do shed, and animals scattered Caylee’s remains throughout the area? Such animals would have been expedient in locating and accessing her remains.

  46. Todd in Tulsa says:

    The defense wrote in the motion to dismiss that “Casey was a good mother”? Is there a new definition of “good” these days? Casey was such a “good” mother, she gets a tattoo while her child is “missing”? Such a good mother that she doesn’t report her child missing for 31 days? Such a good mother that she attends no-clothes parties, instead of spending time with her child? Such a good mother, that in reference to her child, the term “snothead” is used? Wow, good one tema Bozo and accomplices

  47. boz says:

    Gav #80: Here is #10: George and Cindy, could you please tell us and prove to us how much time in the past nine months, since little Caylee’s remains were recovered, you’ve spent looking for the real killer. What steps have you taken to do this?

  48. vidda says:

    Thx, Blink
    Fair point , agreed 100% .It is really hard to keep the faith up some time , rocky times

  49. chitownlady says:

    whats even more laughable, is grandma dearest and Keystone cop gramps are STILL waiting for Caylee to come home……Talk about insanity…..These two (cough cough) knuckleheads are still in the “CAYLEE IS ALIVE” WOW….These family name should go under the defination OF “DYSFUNCTION”…..All they care about is Casey…where is their genuine concern for Caylee? where is their remorse for Caylee? where is the outrage for Caylee? Two sick and twisted people…..

  50. dee says:

    Can anyone explain to me why there was no Gag Order in this Case, does it have anything to do with the “Sunshine Law” in Florida, this may have been explained back in the olden days of this case and I never caught it, I am just curious, can a judge impose one at anytime? After yesterday’s fiasco with the Anthony’s, it seems to me it is time.. well let me correct myself it has been time from the beginning.

    Gracious as always :-)

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment