Caylee/Casey Anthony Case: Casey Anthony’s Defense Has Gone To The Dogs
As previously reported on blinkoncrime.com, the hearing last week ordering Jose Baez and his defense team to submit specific information regarding their expert witnesses, has gone to the dogs.
Woof!
Dr. Fairgrieve, a forensic anthropologist and expert witness listed for the defense, intends to testify that Casey Anthony should have the right to confront her accuser.
Novel, appropriate, good news.
In this instance, one of her accusers with fur, according to her defense attorney, is named Gerus. The other, Bones.
For starters, if the summary of Dr. Fairgrieve’s findings is accurate as presented in this filing, I recommend as a practical matter, he identify exactly what “alerts” he is seeking to debunk.
There are several, all of which are well documented.
Orange County sheriff’s investigator Carlos Padilla told reporters, “We had two different dogs from two different counties that hit on the same exact spot.”
Evidence Bay with a closed car:
Casey Anthony’s Car: Detectives reported a different dog alerted to the same strong smell in the trunk after the white Pontiac had been abandoned in a parking lot.
“They have a hypothesis that the child may have somehow passed away,” Dr. Richard Weinblatt told Eyewitness News.
It is undoubtedly the recent work of Dr. Fairgrieves in a case involving a murdered man, Robert Wone, that got the attention of Jose Baez and his Scheme-Team.
In a successful inlimine motion, Fairgrieves offered testimony in the supporting affidavit that suppressed canine evidence in the Robert Wone murder.
The three male house mates of Mr. Wone were acquitted of the charges they faced as a result, which were not for his murder. The prosecutor himself could not prove his actual cause of death. The trio are currently facing a wrongful death action by the desceadent’s family.
“My role in the case is basically peer review,” Fairgrieve told the Orlando Sentinel. “I will be reviewing reports on the evidence. So far everything I’ve done has been remotely.” Scott Fairgrieve, MD
The ole probative vs. prejudicial argument is not unexpected in this case, I get it.
However, two different cadaver dogs, from two different counties, hit in the same area under or near Caylee’s playhouse. This was AFTER the alerts in the evidence bay on the car trunk, and both searches were conducted with permission from the Anthonys.
That would be the car trunk that produced one latent lift from the accused in this case, Casey Anthony.
Under Dr. Fairgrieve’s theory of “necessary corroboration”, we, in fact, have exactly that.
The hairs that were found in the trunk, including the hair with the “signs of decomposition” corroborate the canine’s alert as well as the report from Oak Ridge Labs.
Let us not forget, that a statement from the car’s owner and material witness in this case, concurs with the presence of decomposition in the damn car.
Reached late this afternoon prior to his Canine Christmas Mixer, www.blinkoncrime.com caught up with Gerus:
Seriously, that dude has my dander up daily. He needs to stay out from under my collar.
I know what I am doing at my job. And by the way, who is calling who a TOOL?
You tell that *My Cousin Vinny wanna be* that he should take his unearned legal hubris and shove it, where in my line of work, I don’t have to sniff.
Unlike him.
Speaking of hubris, a message to George-
The headline is not going to read ” Casey Anthony Not Guilty of Murder By Hereditary Hubris”
It is going to read..
“Apparent Shared Hubris Defect Cause for Casey Anthony to Blame Father in Caylee’s Death.”
Be like a burger and flip already. It’s all you got.
ps. “Shared Hubris Defect” is mine, J to the B.
Related Posts
Related Posts:
260 Comments
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
Rag Doll- Nice to see you. I hope you are well.
Hello everyone- Blink I hope you are weathering the aftermath of your big holiday storm.
Blink, As I am sure you are aware, The defense has filed a Motion to preclude The “Phantom Heart Sticker”
“Casey Defense Files Motion To Keep Sticker Evidence Out”
Link includes motion-memorandum and search warrant
http://www.wftv.com/news/26313890/detail.html
I do not know whether or not they will be successful in this endeavor, but several aspects of their motion give me pause.
One is they wish to preclude any and all mention of “a” heart sticker, and residue ect. Not limited, it would seem, to the possible heart sticker residue/outline that was accidentally destroyed during Fontain’s testing.
As I am sure you are aware, another heart shaped sticker,on cardboard, IIRC, was found at the remains sight. More stickers/backing found at Casey’s home and in Caylee’s keepsake box. Also, Casey’s childhood friend, makes mention of pet burials that took place, which included the placement of stickers, IIRC. Would the language the defense uses in this motion and memorandum- go so far as to preclude any of this afm information also?
Next, if the defense is successful in this endeavor, does it mean that any evidence seized during this search warrant would be inadmissible?
And finally The defense seems to be trying to throw out/exclude all evidence- (which we knew they would) but they also state in this filing that 3 pieces of duct tape were found “near” the remains- which to me, seems to be pointing out the fact that they will try next to exclude these pieces of duct tape, or at least the one that wasn’t entwined and stuck to little Caylee’s hair. Will they also next be trying to exclude most of the evidence gathered at the remains site?
The heart shaped sticker on cb
The horse
The black plastic/other pieces o plastic
the trash bags
the blankets
the balloon
the bag of stuffed animals ect ect
Blink, How successful will they be in excluding this remains site evidence- and will this lead to other evidence also being “up” for exclusion?..such as the trash bag in the trunk the coffin flies/papertowels in said bag- any and all trunk evidence ect ect?
TIA- I appreciate any insights you can share, as I am somewhat ignorant when it comes to the legalities ect.
Excellent Questions, I am hopeful to tackle prior to the January 3rd hearing in total.
So much going on to prep us for May…
B
Understood- & no worries- I look forward to reading it whenever you get the chance. The January 3rd Hearing should be a doozy.
Not too much longer to go before May- how will They ever be ready by then?
Hello Blink. I have been worried about you. I did not know if you were sick or on vacation or what…but I am so happy to see you are still here. I love your comments and trust them to be correct. I’m looking forward to your next comments. Have a happy and safe new year.
mom 3.0 or Blink – Please could you explain to me (I am a total ‘legal novice’) why it could be (perhaps) possible for certain evidence to be inadmissable at trial. Would really appreciate any insight in to how a Judge would decide what was and what wasn’t admissable and why. TIA
Sorry to do this to you, but happy reading. That question is a week’s worth of LSAT study alone:
http://www.floridabar.org/TFB/TFBResources.nsf/Attachments/BDFE1551AD291A3F85256B29004BF892/$FILE/Criminal.pdf?OpenElement
Phyllis, I agree with your sentiment about Blink and her comments. I come every day to see if there are more comments,if Blink has answered them, and to see if there is a new article up!
Happy pre-New Year’s Eve, Blink! Here’s hoping 2011 brings a guilty verdict for Casey!
Thanks for the link Blink I haven’t had a chance to begin reading it-
Chelsea- I am in the same boat you are- I do not know the rules governing the admission or suppression of evidence. i hope to learn a thing or two from the info Blink provided.
Speaking of admissibility- the defense has filed another motion to preclude the video tape of Casey’s reaction to “remains” being found off of Suburban Drive.
http://www.wesh.com/caseyanthony/26323133/detail.html
Story & pdf of motion at link
“Defense Wants Casey’s Reaction To Remains Suppressed”
Snipped-
Casey Anthony’s defense team doesn’t want a jury to hear about or see Anthony’s reaction to news reports when her daughter’s remains were found.
Anthony’s lawyers filed new paperwork asking that any such evidence be suppressed when the murder trial begins in May.
–
Again I do not know whether or not the defense will be successful- but I do know that the State does not need this bit of info to prove their case.
What I find to be interesting is that the defense, to me, seems to be biting off their nose to spite their face.
By this I mean, with both the motion to suppress the “phantom” heart sticker/residue that was destroyed & this motion to suppress the video tape ect- they are denying the jury (if successful) the chance to come to their own conclusions regarding Casey’s reaction & to LE handling or mishandling of evidence ect. Perhaps juror’s would wonder if mistakes were made in this case. Wouldn’t the FBI accidentally destroying potential evidence help them? Isn’t that what Dr. Lee would consider a dream come true?
And IMO, as for the video tape of Casey reacting to the reports of remains found- I would think that could help their client, if viewed by a sympathetic juror or handled by a good defense attorney in court…
Why even in the defense’s own motion the officers that were assigned to observe Casey’s reaction seem to have had mixed feelings…& I would go so far as to say that a sympathetic juror might have actually felt some pity for Casey and the way in which the whole scenario played out… JMO
IMO Perhaps, the defense didn’t think this one through quite enough. But as I said, I am not worried in the least that The State can move forward-without this information if the defense is successful in its motions.
Heck I am not even sure if The State would have put any of this information in front of the jury anyway- We all know lots of investigative info ect never makes it into trial.
Blink, I hope you get a chance to weigh in – before the Jan 3rd hearing -(will all these motions be heard then?) If you are unable I hope to read your thoughts on the hearing and any decisions made ect.
Happy New Year to All
Blink – I was wondering what to do in my spare time over the holidays!! Have made a start and by May, hopefully, will be better equipped to understand process of the trial. Thanks for not tutting and telling me to sling my hook!
Okay- Is it just me or does it seem like The Defense must of hired an attorney to write up a slew of Motions over the Holiday? J/k
Its almost as if The defense is throwing all these motions into J. Perry’s lap in order to punish him for his -I will not be in the building next week- I won’t– comment. J/K But wow-
According to the Docket The Defense wants everything but the proclamation of innocence by their client withheld-
*Murder Docket Updated:
12/30/2010 Motion In Limine State of Florida
12/30/2010 Motion to Exclude Unreliable Evidence Pursuant to FRYE, Or in the Alternative, Motion in Limine to Exclude (Chloroform)
12/30/2010 Motion In Limine to Prohibit the Use, in any Fashion, of a Posting on the Internet Myspace References Attributable to Cindy Anthony, The Mother of the Defendant
12/30/2010 Motion In Limine to Prohibit the use, in any Fashion, of Internet Myspace References Attributable to the Defendant as “Diary of Days”
12/30/2010 Motion In Limine Preclude the use in any Fashion Whatsoever of a Certain “Jib Jab” Cartoon
12/30/2010 Motion to Restrict in Court Photography/Videoing
12/30/2010 Notice of Hearing
12/30/2010 Motion to Exclude Unreliable Evidence
12/30/2010 Motion to Suppress Statements Made to George, Cindy Lee Anthony, Maya Derkovic, Robyn Adams, and Sylvia Hernandez
12/30/2010 Defendant’s Motion in Limine to Exclude all Evidence Relating to Canine Searches and Alerts
12/30/2010 Motion and Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendant’s Motion to Exclude Irrelevant Evidence of Stain in Trunk of Car
12/30/2010 Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendant’s Motion to Exclude Irrelevant Evidence of Tattoo
12/30/2010 Defense Motion to Exclude Irrelevant Evidence of Tattoo
12/30/2010 Motion to Exclude Unreliable Evidence
*Posted originally on WS
It is confirmed. These yahoos are imbeciles with a JD.
If one reads those carefully in succession, it is a timeline.
He is the little man behind the green curtain, minus the curtain, lol.
B
Most of these new motions really irk me Blink- I know I have only read the titles but the ones I can make an educated guess as to what they are refering to– Really?!
12/30/2010 Motion In Limine to Prohibit the Use, in any Fashion, of a Posting on the Internet Myspace References Attributable to Cindy Anthony, The Mother of the Defendant
12/30/2010 Motion to Restrict in Court Photography/Videoing
12/30/2010 Motion In Limine to Prohibit the use, in any Fashion, of Internet Myspace References Attributable to the Defendant as “Diary of Days”
12/30/2010 Defendant’s Motion in Limine to Exclude all Evidence Relating to Canine Searches and Alerts
12/30/2010 Motion and Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendant’s Motion to Exclude Irrelevant Evidence of Stain in Trunk of Car
12/30/2010 Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendant’s Motion to Exclude Irrelevant Evidence of Tattoo
Their use of the words Irrelevant- please- and I thought their use of the word “ruse” in the remains video motion was too much…
I can’t wait to read their thoughts on why all the motions should be granted.
Hello
Blink chelsea momof3 and all my friends. I will be checking in more often now that things have settled with my brother whom I am happy to report is now home recovering.
I wish you all a happy new year!!
I see baez is up to his maniac mania with all those rediculous motions. Is he bipolar?
I cannot wait until may comes and casey is sentenced.
I am willing to bet that Judge Perry is not going to be to happy with those two idiots.
There is more circumstantial evidence against casey than there was on nelson serranO(MASONS) client now sitting on death row.
when mason first came on board everyone thought mason was such a great legal begal lawyer now we see that he blew smoke up his own arse!!
HAPPY NEW YEARS
JUSTICE FOR CAYLEE
P.S
RAGDOLL AND ALL OTHERS I DIDNT MENTION
Happy New Years to all. After reading the state’s motion on WFTV was wondering what you all thought of it. It is with the slew of motions that the defense team files on the 30th. Do you think this is in response to Mr. Baez’s motions or a separate motion.
Also on the motion that someone was trying to take still photos of Casey’s notes while at the hearing, I have a theory on this. On another blog site the owner who attends all hearings has posted a picture on his post of the court from the top of the building. He makes note to please not tell the court. Does this mean that no videos are to be taken in the courtroom.
yohooo happy new years just checking in and stalking the net.
I am amazed at their level of stupidity. These lawyers actually believe their actions are not transparent? If you truly believed your client was innocent and was being framed you wouldn’t need to suppress anything,the evidence should mostly relieve your client of guilt. Please God- let intelligent people pretend to be stupid in order to be picked for the jury. I know there won’t be a single nurse chosen- no sympathy for Cindy’s BS.I don’t know how Casey can have a jury of her peers anyway – convicted felons can’t serve and parasites can’t speak.
WELL WELL why dont they just toss out the baby to not much more they can throw out.
Ragdoll
you been sick?
good day everyone getting ready for tomorrows hearing.
Joan
baez is as evil and vindictive as his client. It seems like he wants to attempt to make the state look as inept as he has made himself look!!
He clearly is and has been out of control long ago. I just dont see him being effective in this case and in any future cases. I think his career is toast. but thats just me. I think the judge is letting him rant I hope he gets disbarred when all is done in may. Any guesses as to how long the trial will last ANYONE???
Mom3.0
These idiots with a JD are apparently trying for the scatter effect. That is throw all this up on the wall and see what will stick.
This is also a delaying tactic by the defense. They want the court to be covered up in motions which must be read, evaluated and a response made.
All the wood glue in the world will not cause these noodles to stick to the door.
I believe His Honor is not going to be a happy judge when he sits down on the bench tomorrow.
No doubt, I completely agree.
B
His Honor was not happy . . . well he was trying not to laugh out loud lol oops sorry that means lots of luck perhaps?
Not sure what thread to comment on…So here I am-
Today’s court proceedings:
Very eventful day today.
Honorable Judge Perry ruled again that The Defense is to provide written reports from their experts to the State- However, this time he did stipulate that anything (opinions ect), not included in these reports will not be allowed in as testimony at trial. Jeff Ashton made an excellent argument for specific sanctions- he wanted the defense to be held in contempt, charged $500 a day until the order was followed- and that any and all motions to be heard would be held back until the defense complied…. Judge Perry was not that agreeable to this, the motions were heard, although, as I said, HJP did put his foot down-
After today’s proceedings JB asked for clarification on the sanctions- and asked for 30 days to get the report- HJP said no- but basically said I will give you more than the 7 days …talk to me later.
HJP ordered that The State may have 15 days to file a response to the other motions-
HJP granted The Defense’s request for money that the JAC objected to, in the interest of time and so as not to cause any further problems or delays.
Mason- added another motion that he failed to alert the State to, this motion is to exclude all statements given by Casey Anthony- the trip to locations to find Zeniada-Universal I believe, ect ect- he mentioned that these statements were given while Casey was handcuffed but had not been read her M rights…..
The State argued that since these type of motions were to be heard no later than November 2009- they should not be heard now- Mason countered that they are trying their best- and argued that the judge should only want to have this case tried once- to which HJP answered (pp) You’re right but I don’t mind it being tried twice-don’t take advantage of this court- deadlines are deadlines— then HJP said he would hear these motions-
The State granted/agreed to several of the motions- No sex talk with either TL or AR. The knife- they don’t need it, the jib jab video they weren’t going to use it…
HJP- said the camera and audio stays- but Casey and her team can move their defense to the table at the side of the court room, away from the gallery, and with their backs to the wall-(They’ll be much more comfortable in a situation they are used to, Sorry couldn’t resist) HJP- laughed at the commentary from a blogger that Mason read out loud to court regarding his mic being on unbeknownst to him- and calling Mason an idiot- Mason gigled yet didn’t think it was too funny, as he wishes to meet up with said blogger and confront them- I am sure he was J/k
All evidentary motions will have a hearing/s which will possibly take several days- and have a # of witnesses testifying.
As will all motions that will need a Frye hearing-
The Canine issue, HJP said the defense will have to show precedent- otherwise it is admissible
Kronk’s prior bad acts HJP sited several cases- regarding prior bad acts- and said he would rule if the defense needed him to, to which Mason answered(pp) yes- and we will take it up during trial with objections or …
I did not catch what happened regarding the motion to prevent the defense from calling witnesses liars, accusing the jail or the state of a ruse-ect Perhaps I missed it as things were kindof muddled and shuffled?…
JA- asked that there be bimonthly status hearings as they all move closer to trial- The SH for Monday has been moved to Fri of next week.
For the most part it was a day like any other- The defense- himmy and hawed and basically extended deadlines because they are trying their best and the State keeps giving them more evidence/doc dumps- The State-tried to work around the Defense and made a point to say that they to, are trying to make sure that Casey Anthony’s rights are protected. HJP gave warnings, however this time he did attempt to reign in the Defense with back-up and HJP did his job of protecting Casey Anthony’s rights at the same time ruling as law stipulates he must.
I am sure i failed to mention something- I apologize if I missed something pertinent… BTW- I thought Casey Anthony looked nice. Perhaps she got new clothes for XMAS
All JMO
I am here my friend, watched the hearing while meeting on developments on a different case, but you betcha I am on it.
I am surprised though, did you miss the footnote from the tat motion? You?
Lol. I apolly I am so stretched, I was busting at the seams today.
B
PS- Regarding The defense complaining about more Doc dumps- The State just handed over more than a thousand pages-including a cd or on a disc…
Texas Grandfather- hello- and I agree- although I do believe that the State is well-prepared to counter any and all noodles that may stick.
Chica- hello- glad to hear everything’s okay- it will be nice to have your energy back around BOC
Happy New Year to All- I look forward to reading your thoughts- Blink & all
What happens now? Does Judge P go away and deliberate?
chelsea, I would say His Honor was prepared to rule today. I love it when he picks up a stack of papers with the big fat clip, licks his fingers and squeezes the edge of the papers . . . that’s his “tell” all research has been accomplished and he is ready to rule, JMO mind you, but I think the duhfense was about to get some more slap downs.
Congrats Blink of your citations LOL and I don’t mean lots of luck :>)
Heh heh, he is an absolute delight. In such a grotesque and heinous crime, we got a brief respite from the horror by seeing one of what I presume to be many smackdowns.
My CJ Perry mancrush is intact!
B
Jose Baez seemed to be very shaken at the very end of court today when he asked for 30 days to comply with complete discovery for his expert witnesses. Judge said that he would not grant nearly so long and that the bright prominent experts know very well exactly what they will testify to. I wonder whether if in some cases, the defense has not yet actually contracted some of the experts? Such as Dr Freeman the epidemiologist and he has not yet even reviewed the case?
Chelsea1515; for the most part, the prosecution has 15 days to submit written responses to the defense motions to supress evidence. Judge will then enter rulings on the motions without further responses from the defense.
momof3
hi I watched the hearing today wasnt that a smackdown for bozo hahaaa he looked stricken!!
Yeah good to be back to normal missed BOC
misssed my friends.
meet me back here tomorrow lets chat some more all of you here!!! I missed you all
sister chelsea alll of you!!MOMOF3
Blink, you said before that you think Mr. Baez is trying to get a mistrial. When the Judge said “I don’t mind trying this again if I have to” I took that as a warning that he isn’t going on their ride or playing their games.
I took it as a warning that if Baez or Mason thinks that should be perceived as a threat, as in, something the judge orders resulting in a mistrial he can think again.
B
One more thing, Blink. Why do you think Judge Perry brought up the Curtis Jackson letter? I doubt he did that for the comic relief. However, it did seem to show that he knows the case better then the defense team.
Absolutely, he was telling him that, in essence, since y’all missed this, I just want you to know I did not, and I am paying attention to every detail.
B
Thanks ‘sister’ for explaining procedures, much appreciated.
I find I am grinding my teeth every time JB puts forward his motions; hope they survive the course. Thank goodness for Judge Perry – many years since I suffered a mancrush but have definitely got the symptoms!
ps. My teeth, I meant.
Hi chica, I was delighted with everything. Another inch closer to justice for Caylee. As the State has an obligation to turn over everything that is received, I guess the Defense must comment on each piece. Is this correct some legal eagle? It’s been a few decades since my course on evidence.
o/t so glad your brother is doing well.
Hearing tomorrow at 1:30. From the Orlando Sentinel;
Headline:
Casey Anthony hearing set for Wednesday
Defense team wants Suburban Drive photos
The document states that a Dec. 8, deposition of Jordan, a state witness, showed that he was an online blogger, who visited and blogged on various websites discussing the Casey Anthony case and the search for Caylee Anthony.
Two sites, “Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community Forum” and “Scared Monkeys Discussion Forum” both posted photos taken by Jordan and linked to his personal website, according to the motion.
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/os-casey-anthony-hearing-wednesday-20110104,0,3458593.story
(((CHICA))). No sickness. I’ve been lurking though…lol.
Did I actually hear Casey compliment Baez on his hair? REEEEALLY? She is completely clueless of her counsel’s inadequacies. After everything that’s been said and acted out, I’d be asking major questions, not handing out compliments while batting my eyelashes.
PS…and Chica, I am happy to hear everyone is getting better. Hope this is a healthy and prosperous New Year for you and everyone.
Hi Sister
Oh how exciting was Monday to us all!! on the edge of my seat listening to every word the honorable judge spoke!! Watching baez flinch and twitch!!what a thrill!! the judge did not disappoint any of us. I kinda wonder if after they left perhaps mason dug into him heavily!!! since he had to try to clean up his mess. I think we all noted that baez had on these huge sunglasses. Where was kathi belich?
oh yes sister my brother is recovering beautifuly thanks to you and all others that held him up in prayer. I am so relieved! that along with the holidays its all over with. New year new health! new blessing.
Motions to be heard in tomorrow’s hearing;
Defense motion:
http://www.wesh.com/pdf/26365821/detail.html
Response from Joseph Jordan:
http://www.wesh.com/pdf/26365873/detail.html
The defense wants to suboena pictures they assume Jordan took on Suburban drive.
It appears that any links to photos put on blogs by Joseph Jordan might not have been photos actually taken by Jordan.
Joseph states that his postings are his own opinions of the case and since he has not been named an expert in this case, they are irrelavant to the case and not subject to disclosure.
Love it.
hello everyone- Argg Blink I just knew I was forgetting something- yes I did miss that tidbit on the tattoo could you or anyone please enlighten me TIA?
page 7 of the motion, footnote 11. Just a link to my tattoo article and a mention that I speculated that the missing dot represents Caylee’s death.
B
My guess is the duhfense is a day late and more than $500 short (teehee) on wanting the computer from Mr. Jordan. Didn’t bring it up during depositions . . . so . . . lol (in this case, lots of luck!).
Blink I was reading throught he old posts, cause I am kind new here, and was looking for the Bella Vita pic. I found it. Makes sense to me what you wrote about it. The star is missing a dot! Also I went back a little further, and read a article on prints on the duct tape, where you felt they had prints, but George, Cindy, and Lee were cleared. This info still has not been in any doc dump so far I dont believe. Are you still of the opinion that they do have prints on the tape? Hopefully Casey’s. I would love to know your thoughts about this. Thanks
I am.
B
I think that the defense can depose Joseph Jordan again and ask any questions they want; I think that Judge stopped short of suggesting that. It’s very hard for me to see how this WASN’T an attempt at a fishing expedition (which Baez denied).
Andrea Lyon talked publicly about blogs and bloggers in this case, even some bloggers wanted to see her client dead and even her too (wasn’t this in the hearing about deviant young mothers who kill their kids?)
So they didn’t know about blogs and bloggers, and didn’t do a thing to check into Joe Jordan’s background when they got him into this mix of setting up the affidavits to support Todd Macaluso’s grand court claims? Guess that the proof sheet that JB handed to the judge today as support for the first time ever he knew about the blog with JJ as per the motion (SM and WS), was from his new PI and given to him post-deposition. Crazy they went into a depo two years in and had no basic info, even to generallly ask a searcher on Suburban, if they took ANY photos. Not bright.
Interesting tidbit, I didn’t know that Jordan was arranging places for Gale’s dogs to search, like hopefully the back of the Anthony home (from SM blog comment by JJ), because people in Orlando with search dogs, aren’t given permission by OSCO to search. But was ok for the Gale dogs.
Kleat, as usual, you hit on something very important to me.
The Gale and JJ connection is coming back, and Imo, was was part of the motivation for today’s hearing.
B
Carolyn S … “Why do you think Judge Perry brought up the Curtis Jackson letter? I doubt he did that for the comic relief. However, it did seem to show that he knows the case better then the defense team.”
Absolutely, he was telling him that, in essence, since y’all missed this, I just want you to know I did not, and I am paying attention to every detail.
B
————–
Yes, and at the same time, Judge Perry made sure no stone was left unturned ON RECORD for use by Ms. Casey and her possible future-civil-lawyer-looking-for-new-ways-to-make-money (another of the judge’s perceptive and pointed warnings to the ill-experienced Baez). Perhaps Judge Perry recalls past testimony via national media, where the defense team sat together and talked about the ‘one armed man’, the Sam Shepherd case, and of course it’s ‘docu-fiction-drama’, ‘THE FUGITIVE’. And they haven’t even brought up Shawshank yet!
If I were innocent and in Casey’s shoes, I’d demand someone go talk to that Jackson person and investigate who he was talking about. But guess she doesn’t feel the need.
Ah Ha- Yes I remember reading that article Blink- that was back when I was merely a lurker. You always said that both sides read here….
Since The Defense seemingly read the article and the comments, It makes one wonder if much of their arguments and fears and hopes were formulated by you and your very insightful conversations with other posters such as SilverSpoon ect-
Basically- in looking back, much of the case is laid out and argued in the comment section of that article. In re-reading it now- it seems as if the defense paid careful attention… I wonder what they thought of your comment “And for the record, I disagree with those that think Casey is “not that smart”. She is the female Keyzer Soze. Lazy definately. Review her recordings with OCSO.”
If the defense is successful in their latest motion to suppress the Universal interview ect- I still am not worried- There are other ways in which to introduce Casey’s behaviors, lies, ect.
As for the tattoo, as Silver said so long ago- it goes to her state of mind- all the other info could amount to a hill of beans- and that is why I think the tattoo evidence will remain, regardless of any deeper meaning behind it, it shows that while Caylee Anthony was ‘missing’ actually decomposing- Casey got a tattoo, and set up a later appt for herself and a friend- all the while acting as if she did not have a care in the world…
All this is JMO- and I am definitely not an expert-
Yes, it goes to her state of mind, but I do not think that was the heart of the strategy.
Casey is very smart, anyone who thinks she is a dolt, with much respect, is not paying attention.
I am flabbergasted at the inequity of legal calibration between these sides.
He reminds me of that old Norman Rockwell painting of the boys lined up along the fence and the runt standing on the dog to see “eye to eye”.
B
oops I forgot to include the link to your article Blink- See I told you I was not an expert…
http://blinkoncrime.com/2009/10/09/cayleecasey-case-the-tattoo-is-caylee-related-and-a-clue/#comments
Blink, there was a documentary recently, on the SAR non-police cadaver K9 handler and her dog ‘Eagle’, a doberman pinscher extrordinaire, and how she gained fame and respect from her police collegues. She had access to a freezer of human bits and pieces, and would make sure he dog made finds!
Sandy… IIRC, I have notes somewhere of her name. She was imprisoned and should be out and able to get a new dog trained and working anytime she wants. (won’t take long to train a dog for this method!)
Ragdoll
good to see you here! Glad all is well with you. Lol and my lol means laughing out loud not lots of luck haaaa. As mason interpeted. too funny!
my mom 82 yeard old mom was watching casey and she said to me!
she looks like she is flirting with the man!! too funny !! yeah that horrible hair cut must of been done at the barber college. Times are hard for the defense but my take is that somewhere he has stashed that money he made off casey! he hasnt spent it on her case! sloppy work!! she deserves him!!!
LOL SISTER
I typed my comment before reading yours on lol!! too funny! yeah they need lots of luck dont they!! love it totaly!!! finaly justice is mosing down the crooked road. Yeah on the 500 dollars!