Caylee/Casey Anthony Trial: Judge Calls The Defense Liars And The Prosecution Resurrects The Fumblerooski
Blink Discussing Anthony Case Updates on Dana Pretzer Show LIVE at 9 PM.
Listen Here Live
Orlando, FL- Judge Perry calls the defense team Liars- Not a good sign. Yesterday, during Chief Judge Perry’s announcement to the jury about the tentative schedule for the remainder of the murder trial against Casey Anthony, defense counsel Cheney Mason objected and asked for a sidebar.
Mason: We don’t have any obligation to put on any evidence at all. and you just told the jurors you expect us to be putting on evidence, and we may or we may not.
Mason went on to request that the Judge instruct the jury that they are not obligated to put on a defense, and claimed Jeff Ashton agreed with him.
Chief Judge Perry: Then Y’all lied to me.
Mason:NO. Chief Judge Perry: “Yes the Hell you did…” If you don’t put on any evidence, then I will do that.
Mason: Well, we are, so don’t worry about it.
Chief Judge Perry: ..” I will take I cannot trust one thing your side says, anymore.
Heh? I would like to give the benefit of the doubt to his honor, as I did not believe a word this defense had to say going into this trial, let alone 3 weeks later. The State, after establishing what they believe is the origin of the disappearing heart residue on the duct tape came from stickers in the drawer with Caylee’s birth announcements, and re-calling Cindy Anthony for a little light impeachment is headed to the finish line tomorrow.
*Insert defense’s motion for mistrial late today* Denied.
To those of you, and there are many, screaming from the hilltops.. “Is that all you got?” “OMG, is this girl gonna walk?” “What about Dr. Hall?” “How the Hell is Dominick Casey getting out of testifying?” I say chillax. This prosecution team is simply resurrecting the F U M B L E R O O S K I.
The State of Florida, has ALWAYS known this case is going to verdict on THE LAST WORD from the prosecution, or the rebuttal portion of the trial.
Given the defense’s opening statement, there is no question in my mind, nor should there be in yours, that the ludicrous allegations made on the first day, cannot possibly be brought to bear, and while the prosecutions case in chief was meticulous, it is not the “barn burner” for a reason.
Linda Drane Burdick is going to leave that ball on the field for a spell. Ashton will surreptitiously pick it up and head to the end zone unchallenged.
After all, that play did originate at the Orange Bowl.
Related Posts
Related Posts:
445 Comments
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
@ MsEnscene says:
June 15, 2011 at 3:11 am
Good morning my friend!
I have read Dr. Glass’s blogs about Casey. The problem I have with her ‘analysis’ is that she strays from the body language and offers her own personal thoughts. She does not know this case. I don’t understand how she comes to the conclusions without facts to corroborate her BL analysis. Don’t get me started on her spelling and grammar. For an official website, it’s a disaster, imo.
See I feel exactly the same way about she and seamus, there is just no way to not consider important known evidence in assessments.
B
Blink please say the Judge will not acquit Please tell me that this is not all in vain Please Blink
he will not
B
Riverpearl & Charlotte; hi.
The Judicial Notice was concerning translation of the phrase; Bella Vita. It was dropped because the prosecution & defense were able to agree on a stipulation about the translation. You probably know this by now.
Charlotte, hello again; George’s work records, submitted to the court, extend into July, so they also cover whether he was at work on June 16.
Oh. My. Lord. New ADA nephew shaking his head laughing at the motion to acquit. “That’s the legal equivilant of shrugging and saying ‘yeah, we got nothing’”.
I commend His Honor for maintaining a straight face and recessing to at least “consider” the motion. Despite his temptation to spare everyone having to watch the bumbling and fumbling sure to follow if the DT is forced to put on their defense, I suspect his sadistic side will win out, if only for the humor it will inspire.
Wow Deeje, he is there already? Congrats to nephew.
Sigh, that was painful.
B
Keep in mind Blink, even with the fumblerooski play, Nebraska still lost the game. And, by the way, that play that you equate to the State’s strategy, has since been made illegal in NCAA.
I am well aware of both of those factoids, as I mentioned during my radio interview last night.
What you also need to know, is that variations of the fumblerooski, are still run in College Ball, and also have been run in the NFL known as the Boomerooski. I could go on, point is, the fumblerooski is alive and well, and it’s variations, it is nearly impossible to see coming, lol.
Go State of Florida!
B
The Honorable Judge Perry just cited a case from my home state that occured in 1980. Gina Renee Hall, who many of my friends searched for, was a student at Radford University. Gina was a freshman and I was a sophomore. The last place Gina was seen at was the Blacksburg Marriott and she left with one person-Steven Epperly. He was found guilty and is serving life. I did not know Gina but several of my friends helped search throughout the New River Valey. Her body was never found, but there was enough cicrumstantial evidence that the jury found Epperly guilty. Quite a case and the first of its kind in Virginia. May God bless Gina and her family.
Riverpearl, EXCELLENT!! Thank you!! I wasn’t close to computer while listening to the stipulations, and clearly that stipulation in sworn affidavit by professional journalist , Daniel Criswell (sp?) of WFTV Television inc:
“I Daniel Criswell, professional journalist…. currently employed by WFTV TV inc, attach hereto, correct and true copies…. july 20, 2008, at the temporary Caylee Anthony command post…. manned by Lee Anthony…. ”
http://www.wftv.com/video/28237462/index.html
Thanks again… proof that the defense’s statement that George Anthony is the only one with access to the duct tape goes down the tubes. Especially since Casey has accused by George AND Lee of abuse/attempted abuse.
Bingo. There it is. The State just stated the Motive: The toxic relationship between mother and daughter. And now I think I know the rest of the story – about Teddy Bear, that is. I can almost see him now, raising his soggy little head, from his own toxic dump site, metaphorically of course, sorta like, um, who’s that guy we’re not supposed to mention? Ole Greg?
Never heard of him before – ’til you mentioned him – so of course I had to check You Tube. Blink, you have a sick sense of humor.
I love it.
Watcha Doin’ In my waters?
LOL
B
Hi Blink-
I am sure you are following this, but closing arguments for the Christine Sheddy murder are also to be happening today…
I have, I understand the jury is getting the case today. I also understand that Tia testified Christine’s death was an accident. Since she had to have been given immunity to testify, I would seek to understand exactly how she will ever be charged with her involvement.
Really frustrating.
B
I was confused yet again today why there was no response from Judge Perry when the defense asked about the jury’s request to view the sticker yesterday. I was under the impression that this matter seriously needed to be cleared up and on the record today. Judge Perry said “the jury asked” – which insinuates that they are discussing the case outside of courtroom. Was it just one person who submitted that in writing to Judge Perry or did several jurors ask? When questioned about that today, Judge Perry remained stone silent – and I am puzzled by that. Even Jean Cesares with TruTV picked up on his “the jury asked” yesterday and was quite concerned about jurors discussing the case outside the courtroom and what serious implications that could have. It worries me for the State’s case. I hope I’m worrying for nothing.
“How the Hell is Dominick Casey getting out of testifying?”
what is the reason IYO why he wasnt called, excuse me if it has already been asked…thanks
Blink, I am so confused….work has kept me so busy that I havent had time to really check in at all, I cannot stand the defense, but I have a sneaky eeling that come tomorrow that is when the firework shw will begin……
opps “feeling” but it is eeling….
Lleah says:
June 15, 2011 at 1:13 am
“What is the reason that the previously publicized fight between Cindy and Casey on the night of the Father’s Day visit is not introduced in court? Is it because the reason for the fight was that Casey had stolen money from an account that was for her grandfathers care and that it
is not admissable in court because it is predudicial?Excluding this info changes the entire narrative. Reading the transcripts of Cindy’s mother on this site indicates that she told Cindy about the theft on Father’s Day. She left with Caylee after this incident. Did she return in the morning when George says that he last saw Caylee alive??”
Bink replies:
“I think the state is expecting the defense to be drudging up those issues.
B”
Yes, those issues and others, IMO . . . including perhaps the answer to “He knows what he has done”, pertaining to brother Lee.
(Linda Drane-Burdick asked him on the witness stand if he deleted anything from the Anthony’s computers and he said no.)
Just saw this video:
http://video.foxnews.com/v/994771631001/jury-gets-glimpse-of-anthony-family-dynamic
I don’t know how I would feel unless I had walked in Cindy’s shoes. But it just blows me away that she would be mouthing anything at all to Casey after testifying. She always seems so upset on the stand, that I would think saying anything to Casey would be the furthest thing form her mind. Anyways, thought it was interesting enough to share.
When the prosecution had the Tatoo guy on the stand why did they not ask him why one of the dots in the three stars was omitted? I think that the one missing dot was for a dead Caylee. There are/were 3 CMA’s in that house.
Because they were on shaky ground with the interpretation of the tatoo verbiage itself.
The defense will go there, the rebuttal phase will catch all this, no worries.
B
JustJill, it is my feeling that one or two jurors independently requested to see the sticker but that HHJP refers to them in a collective manner, hence “the jury requests” instead of “Juror #4 requests” – KWIM? Much like he refers to himself (as does everyone else) as “the Court.” Also, if one juror requests something reasonable, the opportunity must, IIRC, be provided to every juror present.
Of course, this whole issue will be used as justification for an appeal when she’s found guilty regardless…
JMO. Justice for Caylee.
Smartypants says:
June 15, 2011 at 11:28 am
(snipped)
“Bingo. There it is. The State just stated the Motive: The toxic relationship between mother and daughter.”
OKAY . . . I admit this has been my belief from the start, but was swayed when I didn’t see Cindy’s mother called by the State re “Casey hated Cindy more than she loved Casey”.
Okay, so the the Big Trouble Comes in Small Packages t-shirt could also apply to this motive if, for example contrary to her testimony, Cindy HAD either seen Caylee in that or Casey showing she had bought it for Caylee, and Cindy admonished Casey for her bad mother choices in the dressing of her own child. It may have been that t-shirt that JB was going to address his cross-examin, but decided not to at the time.
May also apply if the wording was directed at the alleged reminding by Cindy that Caylee was Casey’s mistake.
Yes, could very well have been left as a message for Cindy, especially considering Cindy was the 2nd last witness to be called before the State rested.
I still maintain it shows Caylee’s death was no accident, and the t-shirt with the specific wording was deliberately placed with little Caylee.
Casey could say “Not MY fault” . . . just like she said “Not MY fault” she was sitting in jail.
Either way, she had no remorse. The 31 days of “freedom” from both Caylee AND Cindy, and the tattoo support that.
“Memorial tattoo” . . . yeah right. On her back? Where she couldn’t see it? Maybe if there were angel wings attached . . . but there weren’t.
Sorry, sorry!
Oh, gosh, I was not referring “Memorial tattoo . . . yeah right” to any of the comments here — – it was to JB’s thinking. I hadn’t refreshed the page until I posted, then saw Dave. S. and Blink’s comments.
I’m thinking the State didn’t bring up the Big Fight of June 15th because it reflects worse on Cindy than on Casey.
As we know, Cindy had her come-to-Jesus moment “about 6 weeks ago”, and decided that, yes, she should become a witness for the State,darn it, because it was morally and ethically, the right thing to do.(Hope you’re getting the sarcasm, cuz I’m laying it on pretty thick here.)
Anyway, the fight scene would tend to muddy up their own witness, so best not to go there. For the State’s purposes, Cindy has to look like a Grieving Grandmother, shocked, I say, Shocked to learn of her daughter’s goings on.
IMO, nothing less than sheer genius the way LDB et al. tip-toed through that mine field of Cindy poo in presenting this case. Right now a lot of commentators are saying “That’s It?? They’re done???” But I think when this is all over everyone is gonna see why Less is More.
Someone needs to send Chelsea a DVD of a National Football League game and one of the Orange or Rose bowls. She has been deprived of a part of the sports scene in the USA. LOL. Hi Chelsea
We saw Mr. Mason make IMO a bumbling attempt to raise the issue of acquittal this morning. As usual LDB rebutted that issue very skillfully. The defense team has once more produced an indefensible position. Yes, Mr. Mason you made the judge angry and then you want consideration for a motion that was poorly presented?
One thing that did come out of the rebuttal to the motion was that the prosecution is going for the chloroform and the duct tape as contributing to Caylee’s death. It will be interesting to see the prosecution’s use of these means of death in their closing arguments.
In rewatching the latest testimony of Cindy, I was carefully observing
her facial expressions. IMO she has some of the same problems about the factual truth that Casey does. She always manages to emblish her remarks beyond what is really necessary and this shows in facial expressions and is amplified by how she uses her hands.
Cindy’s message to Casey as she left the stand is what any caring parent would do. She cannot undo the acts of Casey, but she did tell her that she loved her. Of course miss spoiled brat Casey, turned her head and looked away. In her mind Cindy wasn’t showing love because she didn’t help her by lying on the witness stand.
I am predicting that the DT will have a two day presentation with most of it being challenged sucessfully by the prosecution.
Chelsea, how I love reading your posts, and your delightful British colloquialisms! I’ve lived in Great Britain on 2 separate occasions, as a child in Scotland and an adult in Cambridgeshire, and am a self-confessed Anglophile. My daughter graduated high school in Peterborough Cathedral, and I ADORE Black Adder!!!!! You’re doing great, much better than me!
See what I learn everyday? Nice to see you friend.
B
Ragdoll – Bless you, love your posts, they put a smile on my face every time. My hubby already thinks I am doo lally tap, spending hours stuck in front of my pc, ear phones in. Guilty conscience makes me leap up to put kettle on when he comes home from working on a job, only to be yanked back as I have forgotten to remove ear phones!! (Please don’t tell Blink but I still haven’t worked out DOY)!
Blink – all your sins are exonerated now I have learned you are a Beckham fan. Love him to bits, a true ambassador for the sport. Your kids have good taste.
My head is in a whirl trying to mentally play out the defense strategy, prosecution rebuttal, what will come out, what will not, what is Cindy up to…. haven’t got time to be fearful. Thought your response to James was handled very well. He was very eloquent but I think you did a great job proffering (my new word)an alternative take.
Great posts from absolutely everyone, we all seem to be singing from the same hymn sheet and my respect for JBP – The Law is The Law), knows no bounds.
Blink – probably not something you can do but am going to ask anyway. I am concerned that we have heard nothing from chica for such a long tim; is it possible/permissable to send her an email just to check all is well. I know privacy and all that but we were all comrades in arms. I miss her dynamic posts but more than that, I am concerned by her absence.
Blink: What is your response to the new witness that the Defense wants to add? Vasco Thompson – a convicted felon for kidnapping. Defense says that he is connected to George Anthony via cell phone records and that George called him 4 times on July 14th?
http://www.cayleedaily.com/2011/06/casey-anthonys-father-contacts-kidnapper-new-witness/
Guys, I love you, nobody is reading prior comments and responses.
Please do, 4th question I am answering on this.
Respect and love,
B
Blink, Do you think that this convicted Felon (Mr. Vasco)had anything to do with the death of Caylee? WFTV is saying that the Defense has recently put him on the witness list. WFTV says George had 4 calls on his cell phone on July 14, 2008.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
B
About a week ago, Cindy was asked how long she searched for “Zany.” Cindy said that she was searching UP TO 6 WEEKS AGO…. Oh my! major denial for 3 years!
That said…I’m shocked the Prosecution didn’t then immediately ask her, “Well, what happened 6 weeks ago that made you stop looking?”
The answer would have been valuable. Cindy would have likely said, “well, that is when Jose came to us and told us that the Defense’s position (and Casey’s position) is that Caylee was never missing, there was no nanny, and Caylee drowned.
Linda would have been free to ask Cindy about this convo because it is not protected…Cindy isn’t Jose’ client.
“Cindy had her come-to-Jesus moment “about 6 weeks ago”,”
Yes…when Baez told her that Caylee drowned, there was no Zany, and George is going to get a lot of the blame.
Wouldn’t you love to be a fly on the wall at the Ants’ home? Can you imagine the convos (especially since they’ve had their memories refreshed watching all those jailhouse videos).
I can hear George…”Casey let us run all over this country looking for Caylee, spending thousands of dollars, quitting our jobs…and she knew the whole time Caylee was dead??? And, she told us all that crap during all those jailhouse visits?”
What’s this? I just get home to breaking news on HLN
New defense witness added – - – claimed he had communications day before with Cindy’s 911 with George?
Ant’s attorney says George does not recall communicating with this person?
What?
really , the night before the defense is set to open? Isn’t that shocking, that a convicted felony kidnapper, with a transposed number other than the one George was calling, or may have been calling?
This is as tiresome as Mason’s motion was this morning.
These clowns remind me of the time I fell out of a tree as a kid, and I was grabbing every branch not to hit the ground. With the slight exception I was able to get up after the fall, and a kiss from Mom, followed by scolding about being up there too high, by same
B
B
“Fumblerooskie”..LOL..Blink you never fail to amaze and amuse.LOL..Mr Mason can not possibly be having the “FUN” that he claimed it would be, after being called down on a Lie…Not a good way to retire a career of 40yrs,….PS…could you give Dana a call there is no link for last night’s show..I love his Show..Thank you & God Bless…
Lol, Dana is aware, lol, we are looking at early evening. Our conversion software is “ours” so we are reliant upon certain IT resources as opposed to other shows that do not own their material.
sigh, we are working on getting them up faster.
Dana is awesome, isn’t he?
B
Much Oblige Blink…Dana is awesome and so are you!…Happy Lunar Eclipse….:)
TY
That explains plenty, I need to pay more attention to that.
B
Blink, I came home somewhat relaxed . . . and thanks to your reply I can stay that way – - for a while, anyways!
xoxo’s
Guys, I love you, nobody is reading prior comments and responses.
Please do, 4th question I am answering on this.
Respect and love,
B
Blink – with all due respect when other peoples comments are in moderation we do not see them. When I asked you that question I did look through the most recent questions and comments and it had not been mentioned.
Sorry for any inconvenience
Charlotte- I owe you an apology.
As reminded by the Lizzinator, my alter ego, lol, your exactly right.
My bad.
Big Day, Big Week at BOC all at once. Again, my appolly.
B
Riverpearl~
Thanks for responding. I was wondering if it was just me.
ITA with what you added. Couldn’t have said any of it better myself. I love that about LDB. So glad we are at the half way point.
LOVE THIS from you RP!
IMO LDB is soooo patient …
AJMO …”but by her not ‘acknowledging him’/ or telling him ‘to step off’ … she shows him how ‘little’ he is … and his ‘tactics’ [bullying] w/ her will not work … nor ‘his looking over her shoulder’ will ‘give him any answers’.
AJMO
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
oneilgirl75~
I would like to add to your statement:
… “I wonder what the jury thinks of this attorney” Does he look creepy to them when he is standing up there (especially when he is standing next to LDB when it’s her turn to be up) like he does to me? “…
IMO JB acts like he’s in school, hasn’t prepared for an exam, is peeking over the smart girls shoulder to get the [right] answers … as well, screaming, this is mine, this is mine [taking & grasping on to podium] … you can’t have it …
AJMO
************************************
@oneilgirl75 says:
June 14, 2011 at 10:06 pm
( I always miss these and have to wait for it to be on podcast. Being a Mommy comes first so I am used to being on delay. I am glad you posted what you did however. I was beginning to wonder if I was watching the case from a totally skewed point of view. I keep thinking “Is anyone buying this load of poooooo” and “I wonder what the jury thinks of this attorney” Does he look creepy to them when he is standing up there (especially when he is standing next to LDB when it’s her turn to be up) like he does to me? I really didn’t have much of an opinion on him until I watched him during the trail. He just looks like he is in over his head. I worried that the jury would feel bad for her because they realize what a idiot her lawyer is. I had visions of him saying in his closing statement “Do not convict my client because I don’t know how to do my job” Now that is a defense that actually might fly if he said it in the right context.
Riverpearl- I neglected to thank you for posting the new link in the other threads, I sincerely appreciate it, as I know other readers do. I am usually just finishing here when the phone is ringing from Dana.
Thanks again.
Everyone- will post podcast when available.
B
32.Riverpearl says:
June 15, 2011 at 3:02 am
Oh, oneilgirl75~ “he looks creepy to me every time he does it”…
IMO LDB is soooo patient …
AJMO …”but by her not ‘acknowledging him’/ or telling him ‘to step off’ … she shows him how ‘little’ he is … and his ‘tactics’ [bullying] w/ her will not work … nor ‘his looking over her shoulder’ will ‘give him any answers’.
AJMO
Blink, all respect and love right back at you, but you’re moderating/answering the posts latest first again.
So, you really can’t expect the 3rd or 4th post on a topic to have read what you hadn’t posted yet when they submitted.
I know it’s how you get the feed, but you really just can’t scold on that account, lunar eclipse or not. : )
P.S. LOVE the falling-out-of-a-tree analogy. Mine would be realizing my brakes were failing as I careened down a hill on my bike straight towards a brick wall. Amazing the things you’ll try.
Lizzy, I am posting this, because if it were not for your keen eye, and me moving at defcon speed, I would miss important stuff. I wanted to say I appreciate you, and yes, it is how I get the feed on the 4G.
heart u and thanks
B
WPG & SP- hey you forgot the hanging teddy bear icon that shows a little girl that resembles Caylee
snipped from news13-
http://tinyurl.com/6bnlbqs
“On the laptop was a cartoon drawing of a little girl starting at a teddy bear hanging from a noose, with the caption:
Why do people kill people, who kill people, to show people that to kill people is bad?
The image was in a folder on the desktop of Casey’s computer, and was last saved on July 8, 2008 — one week before her daughter, Caylee, was reported missing.”
So early in July Cindy realizes that Caylees teddy is missing- she has been sleeping with it for comfort since Caylee has been gone.
She mentions this to Casey- then she finds out the teddy is gone- she goes to Universal.
Yep- I too think little Caylee was killed to teach Cindy a lesson- to spite Cindy- to get back what was once given.(Caylee)
She hated Cindy more than she loved Caylee
(pp)
what was given can be taken away
Everyone lies everyone dies-
Life will never be easy-
With great power comes great consequences
Cindy had the power- She had the house she had the car she had the cc she had the3 money Cindy could willingly pay the cell bill ect- and continue to let Casey be Casey and all that entailed-or else pay the consequences
Cindy would never again be able to hold Caseys lack of mothering abilities against her- she would never again get to threaten to take Caylee away and throw Casey to the curb-
and the added bonus was Casey got to lead the life she always wanted free from all responsibilities -playing house with her new boyfriend- free from all the chains of Mommy duties.
Poor little Caylee-
as for Cindy telling Casey she loved her yesterday- I find it to be very sad and disturbing- Cindy has to realize what and when and why and how-
Casey killed her grandchild- she may still love her- but to tell her that in the middle of her trial- especially when she is accusing her husband and son of such horrible things is wrong-
There is a time for such things and now isnt that time.
Now its up to the defense to lay down the proof that supports their opening statements -otherwise the jury must disregard it all. Lets hope the Anthonys love for their daughter, doesnt include them helping to bolster that BS.
Nomatter what, lets hope the jury is comprised of 12 reasonable people- who can sort through the BS and realize the truth of the evidence.
AJMO
@ chelsea…
At least you’re ironing and getting things done
My husband, bless his patient heart, sits there and listens to me rattle on and on about the trial, new developments, etc etc etc. I have nothing to show for my day but the trial. I have to have y’all over for dinner sometime.
Don’t think too hard about DOY. Literally….DOY is DUH. It’s not an acronym. You know on cartoons, when a character gets knocked on the head, and tiny birds and stars are encircling the noggen….eyes crossed….lights are on, no one’s home sort of thing? That is so DOY. Dumb and dumber.
I heart you c lady!
Didn’t Cindy say in one of many interviews……Cindy had been sleeping with “Teddy”, noticed it was missing, called KC asking her if she had been home and taken it. IIRC, Cindy stated Casey told her yes, she had Teddy. Sorry I don’t have a link, I just remember hearing Cindy’s conversation about the teddy bear with LE.
Mom3.0 says:
June 15, 2011 at 4:30 pm
Brilliant. You are a connect-the-dots pro, Mom. I feel like I just read the truth regarding motive AND it makes sense!!!!!
Ok, so we are all a bit lunar.
Reading up on VT. I have to admit….I’ve NEVER heard this guy’s name before. What I’m getting is that this is a dead end. Why woud the DT risk putting this witness on the stand at all?
This VT dude is someone I would not wanna mess around with, get what I’m sayin Baez?
Mom3.0
You nailed the motive for Caylee’s demise. The part about the power that Cindy controlled regarding Casey is so true.
Every sociopath has to have at least one enabler and Cindy was Casey’s enabler. Neither Cindy or George had the guts to call Casey on her game. I would bet that if one could investigate who was paying for Casey’s cell phone, providing a roof over Casey and Caylee’s head and of course providing an auto for free, it would be both George and Casey.
Dang Blink, we used to say that girls who climbed trees were bound to be smart. Glad nothing was badly dammaged. LOL
Remains to be seen, lol.
B
OOPs meant to say Cindy in regards to enabler.
Mom3.0,
You laid that out sooooooo well and I agree with you.
I have faith in the jury, the State and of course HHJP.
Yes, expecting some ugly things to come out about the A’s (whatever they are), but I have faith in the State to take the defense’s case and turn it into a lavender-coloured silk purse with a guilty verdict in it.
I’m looking forward to the rebuttal witnesses. I think they’ll make the most important points of their case rebutting the defense’s case. Go get em guys!!
Also..just how many different versions of their lies are they going to try and bring up? Calling this new witness is almost the dumbest thing they could ever do, I think. First kidnapping, now accidental drowning, and what? now someone new out of the blue kidnapped her? Maybe he and Kronk fought over her and the duct tape blew in on a tropical wind storm? I guess they think the jury has no memory. Hoo boy, what a tangled web they weave. Hang in there sweet Caylee.
Today when opening the shock for my pool it like to make me hit the deck. The fumes were kicking as always and it may me wonder if Casey could have stuck Caylee’s head in the bucket of chemicals and knocked her out. Very strong.
Geeze…Baez is the classic example of what what Shakespeare meant in Henry VI “First let’s kill all the lawyers…..” Mark Najame just came up with a great line about greiven Casey, noting she was expressing her “grief” by ” screwin’ and tatooin’ ” ROTF LMAO !!!! and Mark is a defence atty. He thinks Casey has no choice but to take the stand.
Mom 3 you are spot on. Thank you. Most people in the medical field are control freaks. Not in a bad way, but in an over protective controling way. Most know they are caring for the Lords Lambs. Their expectations of themselves are very high. I feel Cindy is still saying to herself what did I do wrong, blaming herself. The Lunar is effecting me too. I feel very sad for this family. Especially today and tomorrow with all the Hype that going on.
JMistrialB pulled this new wittness out of his ars. What a goon.
JEN — I hope you are correct about just one or two jurors submitting in writing separately to Judge Perry about getting to see the sticker because Jean Cesares indicated it could be worse than an appeal issue. If Casey is found guilty and the “sticker incident” remains off-the-record, then immediately after being found guilty, Jean said the state could ask for some legal term that I’m going to call an “exception” and if found to be valid, she would walk free and clear. That scares the heck out of me. I trust Judge Perry and think he’s doing a marvelous job – it just bothers me that he said nothing when Mason asked him about the situation.
(Better go buy me some peanuts and Cracker Jacks – defense case starts tomorrow)
Blink – you’re awesome, by the way!!
BlinkyBlink, allow me to say thank you! To you and Val and all your wonderful posters for keeping this real, informed, and based on known facts.
It Seamus quite entertaining to watch the spontanious combustion, Glass flying everywhere, concerning other less informed opinions. All in the feeding frenzy to gain popularity while demonising people “making millions of the death of this precious baby”.
Very Whoraldo-ish I must say, analyse that …
Go state of florida! I pray they are ready for whatever lies are thrown out there!