Jerry Sandusky Trial Begins: Witness 4 Says Dottie Sandusky Walked In- Amendola Commits Jerry Will Testify In His Defense- Histrionic Disorder Causes Love Letters To Kids

Bellefonte, PA-   The trial of Penn State’s claim to shame entrepreneur,  Gerald Arthur Sandusky began yesterday.

The victim, “just wanted a father figure,” McGettigan said, “but the defendant would spoon with him, put his hand down his pants, touch his genitals.”

- Prosecutor Joseph  McGettigan

The following is my editorial on day one.  Bring your air sickness bag.  It is promising to be that bad, and worse.

Witness (victim #4 ) testified to resorting to hiding in his closet with the phone after months of  alleged abuse by Sandusky.  13 at the time, He said the alleged assaults became as frequent as two to three times a week and lasted for about three years.  He weighed 90 lbs.

“I’d come home from school and look out the window and he’ d be there and I’d grab the phone and hide in the closet..”
Do your own math, I can’t stomach it.

He also claimed that Dottie Gross Sandusky walked in on him and Jerry during an assault.

Dottie-Gross-Sandusky.  You tell me- what’s in a name?

No sound sucking vortex overcame the courtroom.

No gasps.

Mrs. Sandusky, adoptive mother of 6 can say what she wants to those in town,  but at the end of the day, it is this authors opinion that Dottie will find herself a party to a legal proceeding or two of her own if she is not already.   I have had the opportunity to speak with a few locals last week off the record,  and the consensus was that Mrs. Sandusky is in supreme denial.  No doubt brought on by her husband’s recently diagnosed lack of consideration of others.

Backfields New Motion

Joseph Amendola claims Jerry Sandusky suffers from Histrionic Personality Disorder in a motion filed yesterday.

Is this a window to both Amendola’s defense strategy and laying the groundwork for leniency in the event (when) Sandusky is convicted by a jury of his peers?

Interesting that such a diagnosis surfaces now.  In offenses that stem since 1994- how consoling to know that Jer Sandusky was simply creating conflict in romantic relationships.   ( Author reminds readers that instructions to provide ones own air sickness bag appeared at the beginning of this piece).

ICD-10

The World Health Organization‘s ICD-10 lists histrionic personality disorder as:[9]

[A] personality disorder characterized by:

  • shallow and labile affectivity,
  • self-dramatization,
  • theatricality,
  • exaggerated expression of emotions,
  • suggestibility,
  • egocentricity,
  • self-indulgence,
  • lack of consideration for others,
  • easily hurt feelings, and
  • continuous seeking for appreciation, excitement and attention.

 

Perhaps I need to further inspect my friend and colleague pool.   I know like 20 people that qualify for all of those traits and not one of them is a pedophile, or an alleged pedophile, nor has any ever sought the sexual companionship of children.

Amendola would have done better to motion that Sandusky had obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) resulting in mutual showers after contact with children of “abstract backgrounds”.   I mean, disadvantaged children in the foster care system should shower more frequently as well, right?

 

McGettigan also produced a contract between a victim and Sandusky (via The Second Mile) that guaranteed the victim up to $1000 in college expenses if he kept his grades up.   The Second Mile does not promote unsupervised visits with it’s participating children and therefore the contract would be invalid.

Um, someone maybe should check the handbook- every one of this victims over 15 years came from The Second Mile and everyone of the alleged atrocities were committed sans “supervision”.

 

Related Posts:

236 Comments

  1. beejay says:

    @Rose: ITA. See my post from last night. Blink is holding another one wrt that posted this a.m.

    beejay says:
    June 12, 2012 at 9:21 pm

  2. hervness says:

    The thing we need to be teaching is our kids is that it’s not always strangers. My sister was abused by a friend of my parents. Our parents would take us over there to play with their kids, the male was friends with my dad in High school, they all still hung out years later. They delivered my sister to her abuser. Nobody had any idea (allegedly) until 10 or so years later when my sister said something. At that point, his wife divorced him and my parents stopped speaking to him. To this day, some 30 years later, my sister still doesn’t feel she’s *worth it*. I would guess (from my armchair knowledge) that she felt like my parents weren’t *there* for her at that time. I would also probably venture that when she did finally come forward and nothing happened to him, she felt it again. It’s heartbreaking really because I can see so clearly why she behaves the way she does and what happens to the psyche of survivors. It just never goes away. It creeps in and effects every aspect of your life.

  3. Tar Heel Gal says:

    I sincerely apologize for my lack of knowledge, but can someone tell me what the heck is the “back cracking” that these brave young men keep referring to? I assume it has to do with some kind of spinal manipulation. Did this vomituous monster use that, along with the touching, spooning (gag), raspberrying, as more foreplay?! Good grief. I agree with some of you, that bag-o-puke is soooo getting off on hearing the gut-wrenching testimony. Histronic my behind, he needs to be history. Blink’s words that there are more like him in this nightmare chills my soul. Certainly stands to reason, but still…*shudder*
    Hugs from steamy NC

  4. connie says:

    Dear Blink,
    Thank you for this trial coverage, and especially describing how these perverts operate- all of us can learn from these behaviors and to be on the lookout for pervs and their methods of true madness.
    Mideval ways of torture are too easy for Jer – he needs to suffer, maybe Satan can do it because imo, he has a one way ticket to h@ll. and his wife Dottie? how does she live with herself?
    Those poor boys…they are in my prayers. And McQueary and his father not calling the police? A grown man in the shower with a young boy-there is absolutely no excuse for walking away from that- duh, let me think about this? really? I am currently nauseous and near a trashbag. Sick, sick ,sick bunch of people.

  5. erose says:

    snip>
    An example of this would be JoePa. He knew. He wanted Sandusky out, but he never really grasped the gravity of the situation, nor the potential liability. I believe he could simply not grasp the concept that an adult man had sexual interest in a child. I do not know if it was religious, cultural, or flat out disgust resulting in denial, but I believe in his mind at the time he did what he thought he should have, and in his own words before his passing he wished he had done more. ******Maybe that is enough to inspire many of his loyal fans to do that now.******

    Gave me goosebumps.

    I teared when I wrote that myself. I believe I needed to write, read, and believe that myself finally to be at peace with Coach. He was a good man, a philanthropist, and he was flawed like every other mortal but I will never believe he purposelly turned a blind eye.

    Unlike Dottie and others.

  6. A Texas Grandfather says:

    Wendy Murphy was just on Fox discussing the fact that those in charge of the University did not want to bring this case to a criminal level because it would hurt the school’s and their reputation.

    What a crock! If this is true, then the whole bunch need to be put in prison for the rest of their lives.

  7. erose says:

    So noted. Calling them survivors is my prayer for them.

    Survivor says:
    June 13, 2012 at 10:38 am

    @erose – June 13, 2012 at 12:56 am I don’t know if the witnesses are victims who are testifying under subpoena or survivors who are strong enough to bring some justice for themselves and others. If the latter, while painful now, this horrible step of empowerment now will carry them a lifetime. It’s up to them to become survivors when the time is right – if the haven’t already.

  8. Word Girl says:

    Is John McQueary referring to December 16, 2011, preliminary hearing for Tim Curley and Gary Schultz?

    If so, he’s correct. He didn’t testify there.

    http://www.post-gazette.com/stories/local/breaking/penn-states-curley-schultz-held-for-trial-on-perjury-charges-224540/

    Did he testify somewhere else?

    I swear I am confused as ever on this issue, could they be referring to an investigative subpoena or grand jury? Is this a prosecutorial strategy?
    B

  9. Word Girl says:

    Hang on. I assumed John McQueary would have been quoted in this article if he had testified. Not so smart to trust the journalists here.

    I’ll check back with the deposition or testimony, when I find it.

    mea culpa
    WG

  10. Word Girl says:

    http://www.dauphincounty.org/_files/3193.pdf

    Curley and Schultz Preliminary Hearing transcripts, 276 pp., Dec. 16, 2011.

    On page 2, lines 13-15, John McQueary is referenced as being questioned by Attys Beemer, Roberto, and Farrell, cited on pages 133, 140, and 148 of the Dauphin County pdf., listed above.

    (Talk about a confused Word Girl! For a moment, anyway!)

    Er, I am with you. Is this a paraphrase not quote issue, lol?
    B

  11. erose says:

    @Blink, We came at Joepa from two different directions, and both found the peace. Not the legacy anyone thought, but doing more, starts with wanting or wishing to do more. Of that we are all guilty, and all can aspire to. The truth of his real legacy when it all shakes out, IMO.

    Agreed. He will always have me at the ban on celery in gravy.

    B

  12. Word Girl says:

    I am surprised I hadn’t read that pre-lim transcript before.

    Questioning John McQueary must have been extremely trying for the attorneys. Just reading the 15 pages wore me out.

    So is John McQ manipulative, insecure, forgetful, hard of hearing, or What? whew…I’m open to hearing anyone’s take on him and his prelim testimony and denial of same testimony. (Rose, Grace, Beejay, anyone?)

    Good shout out. I am on deadline times 3
    B

  13. Word Girl says:

    Patriot-News Reporter Sara Ganim writes that in 2000 a janitor (Jim Calhoun) who saw JS with a boy in the shower area told a colleague (Ronald ‘Buck’ Petrovsky) that he saw the man licking the genital area of the child. Petrovsky said in court today that he personally saw two sets of legs in the shower area, as well.

    He also said that the group of workers kept someone near Calhoun for the rest of the shift because he was crying and was extremely upset about what had happened. Calhoun did not testify for himself because he has late-stage dementia and lives in a memory care facility.

  14. Word Girl says:

    Patriot-News Reporter Sara Ganim writes that in 2000 a janitor (Jim Calhoun) who saw JS with a boy in the shower area told a colleague (Ronald ‘Buck’ Petrovsky) that he saw the man licking the genital area of the child. Petrovsky said in court today that he personally saw two sets of legs in the shower area, as well.

    He also said that the group of workers kept someone near Calhoun for the rest of the shift because he was crying and was extremely upset about what had happened. Calhoun did not testify for himself because he has late-stage dementia and lives in a memory care facility.

    http://www.pennlive.com/midstate/index.ssf/2012/06/jerry_sandusky_trial_judge_cle.html

  15. Jane says:

    RE#4 – Connie, I too can’t imagine a grown man not taking action after seeing what he saw. At first glance I probably would have thought my eyes were lying. Second look and hearing the sound of flesh pounding, my hot temper and I would have jumped right in there. I would have beaten the tar out of that man, rescued the boy and made sure proper steps were taken to ensure the safety of the young man and to make sure LE was involved in it all. I’m a persistant witch and would not let it go, trust me.

  16. Rose says:

    @WG. TY for prelim link. Just read it. God knows why gov’t put him
    on as a witness at Schultz’ prelim. And how ironic if concurrent perjury charges by a vimdictive
    prosecutor give a ballfield of testimony on soft charges with ehich to create reasonable doubt in the JSptimary case. Now I know why Penn State is still
    paying their legal bills! What fools to
    have that perjury prelim before JS’ trial.
    On the prelim stand, imo JMc appeared a deteriorating witness and a weak one.

    So WTF was he put on to corroborate his son for.
    Should’ve had a streamlined case in chief & let MM stand alone.
    Hope to goodness they don’t call the second dodderer. What’s the point of their testimony?
    They can only say MM saw something upsetting that night–no sex acts. These two, JMc & Dranov,
    are imo reasonable doubt gifts due to their nomspecifity.

    The jr prosecutor assigned to prep JMc obviously didn’t read that Prelim either, or show it to JMc to refresh his recollection in prep and needs to go back to sweeping floors. One fool can create reasonable doubt in a strong case.

    Obviously he has a hearing problem. Imo he himself knows he has “understanding” problems withquestions these days. He said so in the Prelim. Imo he has some cognitive issues and can remember clearly older emotionally laden info re his son, but not detail–just lines he’s recited many times. His strength in reciting what the Prosecution had heard him say authoritatively and wanted to hear led them to ignore other issues of cognitive weakness (memory, verbal abstract meaning, etc). Foolish to have put him on.

  17. Rose says:

    last paragraph of
    http://mobile.pennlive.com/advpenn/pm_29239/contentdetail.htm?contentguid=yhrFrWMG
    good thing JS is under house confinement.
    He’s been a “stalk by car” guy a long time.

  18. Rose says:

    JS gets the “cleanest man in town” award.
    With those 6 kids sharing bathrooms,
    maybe Dottie was thankful he showered at the gym.

    Who cleaned the basement btw?
    And where were the 6 kids when JS was playing
    foosball down there with his guest? Were Dottie’s
    kids just glad to escape basement services?

  19. Rose says:

    also one might ask prosecutor how Costas’ interview was necessary to case in chief.
    establishing JS’ “denial” is worthless because the point of the defense is to deny.
    Unless there’s more to the played clip than pennlive mentions,
    just another aside for Amendola to run off at mouth about to create reas doubt

  20. connie says:

    To: Jane – Join the good witch’s club- I would have raised the roof! We are all a village or should be. When in doubt check it out.
    I am with you sister…

  21. annals says:

    Jerry and Dottie Sandusky make my blood boil.

    From Boston Herald.com; the article; Testimony raises questions about what Sandusky’s family, associates knew:

    http://www.bostonherald.com/news/national/northeast/view.bg?articleid=1061138384&format=&page=2&listingType=natne#articleFull

    I believe with every one of my fibers that Dottie was confronted with legions of inappropriate situations between her husband and boys for decades. Who has a waterbed in their basement? And on what planet is it OK for men to disappear into the basement sleeping quarters of child guests to play with them alone? With all other family members upstairs? Repeatedly?

    As a child sexual abuse victim, myself, this case makes me want to SCREAM; Don’t turn a blind eye to inappropriate situations;
    -If it looks inappropriate, look again and keep looking, don’t look away.
    -If it feels creepy; don’t get over it; look closer; even if the creeper is one of your associates OR your husband.
    -If you witness the rape of a child; don’t get all befuddled because it’s occurring in your #@(#!^$ prestigious football organization or country club or whatever. Police and hospitals have rape kits, not your dad or your boss.
    -Don’t be surprised if the predator is someone you know or if they’re prestigious or powerful or well liked. Plenty of predators know lots of people.

    In the article linked above, victim #4 testified that a coach who encountered himself and Sandusky in the seemingly ubiquitous showers, hung around until Sandusky left. Good for him, if he sensed something and took the time to stay around to insure nothing amiss happened.

    But when Dottie encountered Jerry leaving a hotel bathroom where the 15 year old boy was showering, though she voiced the question; “What are you doing in there?”, she failed to follow through with any answers to her own question, appearantly, ever.

    I want to scream the question to Dottie; Is there any good reason for a man to ever be in a hotel bathroom together with a showering 15 year old?

    BAAAH. I’m gunna be a screamin’ mimi if Sandusky testifies. I swear; the slimey bellicose sad-sack-ugly shlies pedifiles say…yeah, it’s histronic disordered alright.

    Keep in mind Dottie allegedly called a victim in this case. I wonder if that message will be played.
    B

  22. Word Girl says:

    Rose yw for link. What a detriment to put JMcQ on the stand. I wonder if he’s answered a straightforward question in his life.

    As for car stalking, today I thought that maybe JS was trying to see if the folks in the gym had called the police (who might still be there interviewing) or if he was just revisiting the scene for his own pleasure OR was he thinking about harming (physically or jobwise) the janitor who saw him? We really don’t know if JS saw anyone except for Petrovsky who was waiting in the hallway for him to leave.

    I thought the Costas thing was a joke. It may have been intended to remind jurors of how they felt when they watch/heard it.

  23. beejay says:

    I have to wonder what all these good people do at church, or in their private prayers or meditations. Don’t they seek out spiritual guidance when faced with life-altering decisions? Most of them had not one day to “decide”. But day after day, year after year, to decide or refuse to face reality, responsibility(and its definition as “response-ability”–the ability to respond).

    Diffusion of responsibility assisted. Having conflicts of interest assisted. Being too far removed from the situation assisted. All together, a lot of people share the responsibility for what we’re seeing.

    If ya’ll know of Shel Silverstein’s books, he has an often-quoted poem in his book, Falling Up. (Harper Collins) The book is recommended for ages 1 and up. Like all his work it appeals to children and adults. If I may,

    Woulda-Coulda-Shoulda

    All the Woulda-Coulda-Shouldas
    Layin’ in the sun,
    Talkin’ bout the things
    They woulda-coulda-shoulda done…
    But those Woulda-Coulda-Shouldas
    All ran away and hid
    From one little did.

    [I want to add: or from one little did-not, as the case may be]

  24. beejay says:

    Oh, here’s the amazon link to Falling Up, the earlier poem is on pg 65, viewable online:

    http://www.amazon.com/reader/0060248025?_encoding=UTF8&query=shoulda coulda#reader_0060248025

  25. Word Girl says:

    Rose,
    I think that the number of bathrooms is the problem.
    The Sandusky dwelling only has four bathrooms for 8 people.

    Okay, folks! Everybody double-up!

    This 2776 square foot single family home has 5 bedrooms and 4.0 bathrooms. It is located at(my redaction) Grandview Rd State College, Pennsylvania. This home is in the State College Area Sd School District. The nearest schools are Houserville Lemont Elementary School, Mount Nittany Middle School and State College Area High School.

    zillow.com

  26. Rose says:

    maybe the Costas tape was to desensitize jury in prep for JS on the stand saying same in defense case

  27. T. Ruth says:

    Those poor boys, not only were they JS’s victims, but they were let down by many, many others.

    Since all these children were from the Second Mile, and the Second Mile investigation began years ago, am I the only one who thinks that JS probably began to fulfill his sick needs from another source after that investigation started? And what did he do to satisfy himself BEFORE Second Mile? I have a sick feeling this guy did not begin nor stop with Second Mile children. I can’t look at the creep without wanting to puke.

  28. lizzy says:

    Just looked at some courthouse arrival photos from this morning, and saw JS’s beaming smile. IMO, he still thinks this is going to be “fixed” for him again, and is just annoyed that it’s gone this far this time. Maybe he’s worried that his access pipeline is going to be cut off now. But no way this is the face of man who thinks he’s even maybe going to prison.

  29. T. Ruth says:

    JMO, but yep, Dottie knew. Just like Phillip Garrido’s mother knew about Jaycee and her brand spankin’ new grandchildren who suddenly appeared out of an apparent immaculate conception.

  30. erose says:

    Anthony Sassano, an investigator with the state attorney general’s office, also testified Thursday that Penn State University was “not very quick” in getting investigators information as part of the probe.

    Read more here: http://www.centredaily.com/2012/06/14/3229314/detective-sandusky-home-office.html#storylink=cpy

    Is anyone else worried about the heresay evidence about what Calhoun witnessed that Cleland allowed in re: to appeal?

  31. Word Girl says:

    lizzy, good point about JS thinking that he’s going to skate through this again. He’s done it for so long, he may think, why will this time stick? Perhaps he experience similar assaults as a youngster and nobody has been held accountable there, either?

    I see a bit of insecurity on his face and in his body (neck, shoulders, back) and watched the video of the arrival today. I agree with you who’ve said it’s been hard to look at him.

    After court today, Jer stood with his white ledger box inside the white tunnel waiting his turn to put it into Amendola’s SUV. He hangs back until Amendola gives him the word and then he boldly strides forward, only to hesitate at the edge of the trunk. (Reminded me of ‘helper-buddy’ KC Anthony assisting in her legal defense.)

    Has anyone noticed how often he puts his hands in his pockets? I don’t know if that’s a sexual addiction characteristic, or manifestation of insecurity (hiding his hands; hiding, in general).
    I’ve noticed it from the very beginning. Strange.

    @Truth, good example of Garrido’s mother and the grandchildren. Such a shame she didn’t speak up.

  32. Word Girl says:

    Blink–
    I’ve been meaning to ask if we know of alcohol or other drug addiction in the Sandusky household and, specifically, between Jer and DGS?

  33. erose says:

    Jerry Sandusky’s small group of loyal supporters includes Joyce Porter, who says he’s a ‘saint’

    http://sports.yahoo.com/news/ncaaf–jerry-sandusky-joyce-porter-supporters-trial-child-molestation-dottie-down-syndrome.html

    pass the air sickness bag.
    B

  34. Mom3.0 says:

    Blink- I am thankful for response to my last comment I am glad that you did put it all out there thank you.

    We were discussing Molesters and pedos not always victimizing every child and hiding basically in plainsight because many just do not want to see the truth- they only see the good side and block out the bad-
    family and friends remain in denial-
    I agree and as I said I too am concerned there are other victims out there that just havent come forward, we know this is true because the little boy who was seen in the in the shower with JS never came forward…

    Children are easy targets-
    I am very concerned by the loyalty of one of JS long time friends- and at first I was livid- now I am concerned not because she is loyal- that is her choice if she can balance her loyalty and JS good deeds against these “allegations” I dont agree but I can somewhat respect that- not so much after knowing she has sat through the whole trial and still believes that but-
    then I read on and remembered what you wrote:

    “One of the fears he has had, and continues to have is the ability of pedos to capitalize on adults unwillingness to believe that THEY can be duped. Meaning, if an adult entrusts someone with spending time with their child and it results in their sexual abuse- it is the first inclination for the adult to disbelieve, mitigate, or flat out remain in denial in order to assuage their own guilt.”

    Heres what she said- snipped:

    “One of the things that make me feel like I do is in 1985, we had a little boy with Down syndrome,” Porter said of Matt, one of her 14 children [nine natural, five adopted]. “Dottie and Jerry would take him over to their home. They were wonderful with him.

    “… And my Matt just adores Jerry. You say to Matt, ‘Who’s the best?’ and he says, ‘Jerry!’ ”

    and what has me so concerned we are not just talking about a child who was entrusted to Jerry but a developmentally delayed child- the most vulnerable of vulnerable and I am not saying that this little boy was abused by Sandusky hhe could have been one of those who only saw the good side the”saintly side” but then I am scared that this mom just cant bring herself to see the truth not for what it means to her long time friend but what it could mean for little matty or what she FEARS in her deepest heart of hearts Could have happened to Matt- all becuase she “entrusted” him to Jerry…

    My prayers for all the children and for those who testified and those who did not -

    http://sports.yahoo.com/news/ncaaf–jerry-sandusky-joyce-porter-supporters-trial-child-molestation-dottie-down-syndrome.html;_ylt=A2KJ3CQXcdpPk2AAYVnQtDMD

    AJMO

    At the risk of sounding insensitive- this woman is nuts. She actually said this:

    “However long as the YMCA swimming pool is open there are all aged nude people in the locker room,” she said. “And I think when you are a mother you realize boys are nudists. And I think football coaches, they’re always hanging out.”

    That is beyond creepy and irresponsible and I sincerely hope she keeps talking. WTF?

    B

  35. Rose says:

    @erose. Imo Calhoun’s OK. He testified to what he himself saw (legs, departures, car, need to take care of shaken janitor who came out of room legs were in). imo the statement of the janitor on “licking genitals” neednt have been let in for the truth of the matter, but rather to allow Calhoun to explain why he had to take care of him and calm
    him down all evening as he was very shaken.

  36. kjazzyjazz says:

    I got that, but I can assure you that was not the intent of the comment.

    Hugs
    B

  37. Word Girl says:

    Here’s an abc news-published photo from 1987 at a Second Mile rollerskating event.

    The Defendant is skating behind a young boy in this photo. Testimony we’ve heard this week depicts him approaching from behind.

    This viewer titles this shot as “Threat. Fear. Escape.”

    http://abcnews.go.com/meta/search/imageDetail?format=plain&source=http://abcnews.go.com/images/US/ht_jerry_sandusky_2c_thg_111122

  38. Rose says:

    this trial’s cured me of think Jer was pimping out to rich donors.
    He was too busy using all the susceptibles himself.

    And how easy it is to lure/hook lower socioeco children (a more important variable than fatherless imo) with material gifts–clothes, tickets, toys, trips. And how reluctant the most susceptible kids are to talk. These boys susceptibility reminds me of Kyron’s vulnerability and family circumstances.

  39. Rose says:

    JS also seems quite the loner.
    Those boys over every weekend and
    as companions on outings and trips.
    No time to socialize with adults males.

  40. A Texas Grandfather says:

    I really believe that JS began this behavior as a teenager. We have no evidence of him being associated with deviant behavior during the early part of his life, so maybe he just wasn’t caught.

    The Second Mile was the perfect vehicle for him to get acess to these young boys who had zero protection from a complete family. This means that it was a well thought out plan. The big question is were these young boys ever used as prostitutes for the benifit of others in the Second Mile organization such as donors? As painful as it is to contemplate, were these boys offered to others in the college sports world? I hope the investigators have covered this and the answer is no.

    JMc was a little kid in a man’s body. Any real man would have called the local sheriff’s office via 911 and then gone into the shower and
    stoped the rape by whatever means it took.

  41. Rose says:

    TY for ’87 pic Word Girl. Emphasizes the size differential.
    Jerry’s certainly at an arrested stage of deveopment himself.
    I think the MO behaviors were those done to him
    in a locker room by a coach. Iwould not be surprized if it began
    in college years.
    He could’ve been aware in high school he was a loner and sexually and
    tempermentally different, but not found a release from his anxiety
    through deviant sex til college. I think it most likely he began acting
    out after marriage when he could not find the satisfaction he may have
    hoped would make him normal. I find it difficult to believe his sons were
    not also targets.
    I hope he is on suicide watch. I think it’s likely after he testifies and says
    one last “I love you” to the boys. That is, that’s why he’s calm.

  42. Word Girl says:

    Profound analysis, Rose. Your portrayal makes sense in regard to his arrested development. If he began acting out a little later in life, he may have been acclimated over time.

    Yet, if JS was modeling his learned deviant, pedophiliac behavior when ritually assaulting his victims, then I believe he also was victimized at an earlier age. Otherwise, we could conclude he was sexually conflicted if he was college age and entered into homosexual relationships, which are not pedophiliac or deviant, in nature.

    There is no doubt in my mind JS is a legacy offender. None.

    Will we find out if he is convicted and forced to throw himself on the court for mercy?

    Never Happen.

    B

  43. Mom3.0 says:

    Rose says:
    June 15, 2012 at 12:24 am
    Rose Hello I understand that your comment is just your opinion but for the sake of the children I must point out that being a loner or being temperamental or sexually “different” does not mean that a person is a closet pedo or molester…and I feel I must point out

    Much like rapists- not all molesters or pedophiles
    offend to alleviate or gratify some sexual need- they offend because they are compelled to-
    IMO it has little to do with sexual satisfaction and everything to do with power and control.

    They choose their victims because of accessibility and age not necessarily gender and certainly not because their wife or lover isnt “satisfying” them

    To equate molestation and ALL pedophilia to sexual gratification is allowing the offender to obtain recognition for “the relationship” think nambla
    although many pedos themselves say they are “in love” with the child and they are sexually attracted to a child this is IMO just another way for them to try and equate the sickness, the acts to a “relationship” one no different than that of a married couple or any other set of “lovers”

    Its a lie- and in truth to buy into that way of thinking only re-victimizes the victim making it a purely sexual act for sexual gratification only makes the children feel as if there is something wrong with them- why did their body respond… they must have asked for it– as they do not always understand it is about domination it makes them question their own sexual orientation even though a molester/pedo KNOWS its not because they themselves are gay-

    Also Rose thinking that it is an act of searching for sexual satisfaction or sexual “release” only pushes the blame on others such as a wife or girlfriend for not being able to satisfy them…
    “Whats wrong with me, it cant be true, its all because I couldnt satisfy him…”

    I can not say what category Sandusky would fit into but there is a difference.

    ttp://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/gays-anatomy/200809/homosexuality-and-pedophilia-the-false-link

    snipped:

    Rarely does a pedophile experience sexual desire for adults of either gender. They usually don’t identify as homosexual-the majority identify as heterosexual, even those who abuse children of the same gender They are sexually aroused by youth, not by gender. In contrast, child molesters often exert power and control over children in an effort to dominate them. They do experience sexual desire for adults, but molest children episodically, for reasons apart from sexual desire, much as rapists enjoy power, violence and controlling their humiliated victims. Indeed, research supports that a child molester isn’t any more likely to be homosexual than heterosexual.

    In fact, some research shows that for pedophiles, the gender of the child is immaterial. Accessibility is more the factor in who a pedophile abuses. This may explain the high incidence of children molested in church communities and fraternal organizations, where the pedophile may more easily have access to children. In these situations, an adult male is trusted by those around him, including children and their families. Males are often given access to boys to mentor, teach, coach and advise. Therefore, a male pedophile may have easier access to a male child. In trying to make sense of an adult male’s sexually abusing a male child, many of us mislabel it as an act of homosexuality, which it isn’t……

    I do not know when Sandusky began preying on young boys- but most likely it was when he was younger, as again this has nothing to do with sexual orientation it is a sickness that compels them to offend just like a rapist- who will offend and reoffend usually escalating in the frequency and severity of the attacks-

    Most likely Sandusky did not begin with rape and sodomy – he most likely began with fondling and then escalated- as his MO clearly seems to be with each victim- as though he is reliving his history…

    Molesters and pedos are not even on the spectrum between heterosexual and homosexual- and I would say it is not a deviant “fetish” either-

    To equate it to such is to somehow lesson the fact that this act of rape which is perpetrated on a child someone that can not give consent and has no way of being an equal.

    -
    Thanks for letting me jump off your post Rose inorder to share this information and thanks for sharing your thoughts- I think if Sandusky is found guilty and given a harsh sentence that is when he will consider suicide and I agree that all children who ever came in contact with him need to be interviewed even his own children.

    AJMO
    Peace

  44. Mom3.0 says:

    Blink yes I agree she is so far down into denial that she is crazy- and I do think she is very irresponsible and I sincerely hope that LE and CPS talked to her children as well and I sincerely hope if God forbid Sandusky gets off LE and CPS will be making sure she does not allow att to get into dangerous situations…

    I mean Geez whens the last time she was in a YMCA shower? and not to be insensitive but hasnt she ever heard the song YMCA- theres a reason why the VILLAGE People were so happy to be promoting it- there were men “hanging out” all over and it was known to be a pick up spot- much like rest stop bathrooms are now—DUH-

    Theres a big difference between teammates showering together and a grown man showering alone with a child-

    and I sincerely hope she realizes any little kid at a pool or other should be accompanied by their parent- most certainly a developmentally disabled child-

    AJMO

  45. erose says:

    (Family knows)

    2:05 – 4: one time 4, Jerry, and Jerry’s adopted son were in shower. As soon as JS went to get soap, 4 says JS’s son “looked nervous” and left, showered elsewhere

    2:06 – 4: Dottie caught us in hotel bathroom once, asked Jerry “what are you doing in there?” 4 started shower and didnt hear conversation

    http://www.whptv.com/news/local/story/Constant-updates-from-the-Sandusky-trial-courtroom/MPeXtetfcUqndh5UypOPMQ.cspx?p=4

    (Who advised hotel employee to give him the key?)

    12:12 – Grandfather is dismissed. Next witness is hotel employee who says she was advised to give #sandusky key to pool and gym for him and 2nd Mile kids

    http://www.whptv.com/news/local/story/Constant-updates-from-the-Sandusky-trial-courtroom/MPeXtetfcUqndh5UypOPMQ.cspx?p=3

    (Did anything come of the surveillance?)

    3:24 – Says pictures, records, all sorts of methods used to ID additional potential victims. Also conducted surveillance on #Sandusky

    http://www.whptv.com/news/local/story/Constant-updates-from-the-Sandusky-trial-courtroom/MPeXtetfcUqndh5UypOPMQ.cspx

    Again, I am concerned about giving any identifying info out about #1, so I am holding back commentary, but when I see this:

    10:34 – 1: One time I didn’t meet him at school, he followed my bus, followed me when I got off at bus stop

    Someone hiding everywhere possible to avoid him, the child demonstrating anxiety when refusing to meet with him at school and these assclowns did not figure it out or suspect a thing until Mom is ignored and heads to CYS? This is beyond outrageous and what is the status of the internal investigation?

    I continue to be bewildered by the blind faith and belief this man seemed to be given.

    This is not some appalachian logger town or moonshine belt. I just spent a few weeks back and forth in it, there are some very successful, educated and upwardly mobile folks in these communities.

    What is to be the “take away” here to prevent this from happening again?
    B

  46. erose says:

    Well, as sickening as the prosecution’s case was, I can only think the defense’s denials will be even more sickening, if that’s possible. And this case is just the beginning.

  47. Rose says:

    I think TSM is such a polluted pond it should close.
    Not tranfer the water. Kind of like shutting down Nazi death camps rather than
    turning them into public housing for the poor since they had some useful
    buildings. Shutter the buildings.

    The assets should go into a victim fund administered by the Court period.

    Agreed. There are still children in need, and now, with signifcantly less resources to help them.

    Both state and Fed oversight mandatory though.
    B

  48. Rose says:

    Hi, Mom 3.0. I don’t think I said anything you depict me as saying. Your inferences were not my intent.
    I said, in summary, imo he EVOLVED based on his own sexual experiences in college and marriage, and that imo
    someone in a sports setting used aspects of this MO on him.
    Beejay…a boots on ground report?

  49. Rose says:

    @Word Girl. Looking back at yr comment, I agree with your analysis.
    How old was JS when they moved into Brownston? Likely
    there were other coaches in addition to Dad. I would see his Dad
    as so engaged in all the bldg’s programs & kids, in all the sports and teams and leagues associated
    with Brownston programs and their wins,
    it is my speculation as to his own son he was a distant or
    emotionally absentee Dad when Jer was 7-11, before Jer blossomed as an athlete.
    That is, perhaps one of the many hanger-on coaches associated with
    his Dad’s program at Brownstone taught Jerry all he knows, combining it with affection
    and “love.” I see his Dad as a JoePa in his own tiny Washington community..
    But Jerry is so flakey with such poor exec functioning, I think
    he would have been caught if he’d been a perp on lads prior
    to the shield of marriage and prior to his status at Penn State. PS and Dottie were the
    necessary enablers to this addiction. As you allude, WG, alcohol
    may have played a role.

  50. lizzy says:

    Have any of the adopted Sanduskys been in court? Or are they all potential witnesses?

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment