Caylee/Casey Anthony Case: The Tattoo Is “Caylee” Related- And a Clue?
Disclaimer– exclusive original content copyright and property of Internet Network News, LLC and Blinkoncrime.com. Reproduction of this article in whole or in part without proper attribution and source link is strictly prohibited without prior written permission.
Orlando, FL– Late this afternoon, after pouring over 1400 pages of discovery, a contributor to blinkoncrime.com caught my attention.
Could Casey’s tattoo yield clues into the disappearance of Caylee Marie Anthony as long suspected?
Casey told Lee Anthony her tattoo was “Caylee related” during a jail house visit, although she stated there were no further clues associated with it. She chose the stars because Caylee loved the stars. JoJo would hold her up outside to show them to her at night.
However, comparing the image of her actual tattoo, and that of the Art it was based on uncovered during an interview with On the Record Host, Greta Van Sustern, there is a discrepancy.
The tat on Casey Anthony’s left shoulder is missing a “dot” in the Northern most star of the design. What could that mean?
Was she paying tribute to 34 month old Caylee Marie, who did not make it to her 3rd birthday at her hand, by filling in only 2?
Was she honing her “script” whereby the missing “dot” in the star is some sort of validation of the timer 55 theory, or that Caylee would be home by her birthday so she could “connect the dot” in celebration?
One thing is certain, although she was in custody on and off for nearly a year, OCSO only imaged that tattoo a few weeks ago, why?
What did they recently learn?
Thanks to Stacy Dobson, contributing to blinkoncrime.com for this article.
Related Posts
Related Posts:
428 Comments
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
http://www.wftv.com/news/21276357/detail.html
Casey’s Defense Wants Check Fraud Venue Change
Posted: 6:24 pm EDT October 12, 2009Updated: 6:33 pm EDT October 12, 2009
ORANGE COUNTY, Fla. — Casey Anthony’s defense team is asking for a change of venue for her check fraud trial, which could be scheduled at her next hearing on Friday.
The defense is also asking that each potential juror be questioned individually, out of earshot of the others called for jury duty.
They also do not want the jurors hearing her check fraud case to hear any of the evidence that comes out publicly in her murder case.
What is the reason for jurors to be questioned individually? That isn’t the normal process, is it?
Has a change of venue EVER been sought or granted in a THEFT case?
God, these people are going by the defense strategy known as “Throw enough s..t on the wall and see what sticks.
No, not even if the theft was in the courthouse itself
B
pleeeezzzzzzzzzze The so called dream team should be renamed the dumb team!! A change of venue for a check fraud case???????????????????????????????
comment 114 Silverspnr..my take on casey as Kaiser Soza is that she was not clever enough to make herself go poof and she’s gone_ so I guess that makes her more like VERBAL KINT..JMO lol A legend in her own mind
LOL
B
This is an awful thought(s). But I’ve wondered for some time and have never seen this mentioned.
Is there any evidence that Caylee’s hands were duct taped? What kept her from pulling off the tape enough to breathe? Is this why there were other pieces of tape found at the crime scene?
If she was smothered and her hands were not taped, then that evil woman would have had to hold her. I can’t even imagine.
i do agree with blink about how casey handled her police interrigation. Astonishing. Another sign of narcissitic behavior’ that inability to see outward thinks everyone is a fool and easily blinded. (Turned out she lived in thwe wrong community.
132
Why does Defense needto file 3 separate motions for change of venue ? I hope The Judge gets enough of all these people ..dosnt look like the are shooting at plead deal
Question RE: #127:
Has there been any confirmation that “OrlandoEast” is really Cindy (or another Anthony family member), vs. being just a very busy neighborhood troll?
Cindy Anthony has said some mightily delusional things before, but that post about sunspots, and Casey in a sports bar being both “beautiful” and “scantily clad” … beyond it just being laughably sad… it’s also pretty icky to think of any mother being so fixated on her daughter that she’s sexualizing her own child like this. Oh man, I gotta go brush my teeth to get the taste of bile outta my mouth…
Yeah, Blink, take away the murder case and this is a probation case most likely or maybe 60-90 days at most. They want this fraud case to cost several million dollars so maybe the state will just drop it since they’ll NEVER get a dime out of totmom.
Hey, cannot the State demand that the defense pay for this million dollar demand for such trivial charges? After all … the defense contributes mightily to all this publicity.
It’s not like theres any doubt as to her guilt … she’s on candid camera with her big hoop earrings. Are they gonna claim zanny or Amy dressed up like casey? There is a 0% possibility of beating this.
Blink and Posters:
I just wanted to say, my heart is going out to the Grand Jury.
Can you imagine what they know, and may have seen already. These
are people who have been seated for a six month stay. They left
their stay with this case. I know we all thank them for doing
what is right for little Caylee. I thank Lawson Lamar for guiding
this Grand Jury. May God guide them when laying there heads down
each night in the minds eye of a smiling Caylee. They are the
true angles here. We are just seeing and reading what makes us
sick, they have known for month already. Pray for them that this
little child does not sit heavy on their sole.
Thank you Grand Jury.
Claudia
whoa!! I’ve not been reading this thread so much lately as I’ve been following the others– a big oops!
Msm posted just the one motion for change of venue in the fraud case, that I noticed, thanks Sal!! wow– and Pro Hac Vice for whom???? And for which case??? If it’s all the fraud case motions, will the DP lawyer be heading up the team at the podium, or will it be Mr. Todd, who can fly hearing and there, at his will without booking a seat.
Pro Hac Vice for a new team member perhaps? Why would a DP lawyer be needed for the 1 (or 3) day check fraud case? (unless the rest of the team is inadequate in skills and experience)
I seem to recall seeing a pic or viseo of Caylee with a Peter Rabbit book… Does anyone else recall this? The reason I ask is because the website http://www.bellavitahome.com/baby_girl.html has a cute little girls sweater, a smocked pink dress and “The Tale of Peter Rabbit” book! It has a nice scroll of Bella Vita also but not exactly like the Tat.
sorry I meant to say video
WFTV wrote this on the new motion– I do not understand this sentence at all– what does the defense mean?
“They also do not want the jurors hearing her check fraud case to hear any of the evidence that comes out publicly in her murder case.”
‘any evidence’?? Too late– barn door and all that! Or do they mean ‘during the trial, voire dire through the trial? What about the expected appeal?? They WILL have an appeal if Casey is convicted of the check fraud cases– will failure of the judge to protect the criminal murder case by his allowances in the check fraud case, be reason for appeal in the murder case?
Judge Strickland’s hands are probably tied as far as trying to deal with the fraud case to move it along, in Friday’s hearing– he’s got a lot more to delay his decision (s) now, doesn’t he?
And will the defense succeed in any sentencing of the check fraud case (should Casey lose) to time already served?
Good Point, and yes, that is possible, but it will not change her bond status. Capital cases are not bondable regardless of priors.
I came across something in the correspondence docs of the last 1000+ pages, and it was in the form of a comment about ‘elimination’ dna samples, and the question was asked, what about a dna sample ‘from Zenaida’?
So– it begs the question, why was the FBI asking about ‘Zenaida’ by first name– who did they refer to? The only one is Mr. Morgan’s client, so will the defense take advantage of this and ask the question– ‘did the FBI take DNA for exclusion purposes or other purposes, from Ms. Zenaida Gonzalez, the ‘girl from Kissimee’?
The defense might decide to use this as another ‘flaw’ in the investigation, if the Sawgrass related ZG was never herself, asked for a DNA sample or even fingerprints. The defense could ask ‘why not’ exclude her by these methods, rather than just on some hunch by Yuri Melich that she was ‘not the one’.
I AM NOT SEEING THE 1400 NEW DOCUMENTS. Where can I find them and thanks in advance.
130 comment by joypath ..thanks..Thats what LE should be about. Thats what law abiding tax paying citizens pay for and expect. OSCO did a fine job exceptional in fact. IF THE STATE REMAINS TIGHT LIPPED and presents a sane reasonable case’ casey should receive a fair trial. From what I have seen so far its Baez and his team that are and will presenting the circus very exploitive IMO.
Sdb – #150
Man…your post gave me a literal physical reaction.
The horror of the thought of Caylee’s hands being held while her monster of a mother….
No – I can’t even finish typing that thought.
Every time I see that child’s beautiful face – and allow myself, for even a nano second to imagine her last moments…it brings me to my knees in sorrow.
Unimaginable…..all of it.
Sheer and complete horror and the very definition of evil on earth.
HEY BLINK.. I HATE TO SAY IT BUT YOU GOT PUNKED IN YOUR THEORY THAT BOZO WAS PLANNING ON USING THE “COMBO FRAUD/MURDER PLATTER” FOR CASEYS’ DEFENSE.. THE DEFENSE SEEMS TO ONLY WANT “JUST THE FACTS” ( JOE FRIDAY STYLE)..THERE IS NO WAY THAT CINDY AND GEORGETTE WILL BE TESTIFYING IN THAT CASE.. NO WAY WHATSOEVER…(see motions below).IVOIRE
Again, your exactly correct. Not only that, but the defense was planning on linking the stealing of the funds to support whatever cockamamie circumlocutiatory Bullcaca story they were going to weave. Maybe if they dont plead to the economic charges ( dont see how they can’t) we will let them do the work for the state in that regard. We are at “Check” awaiting “Checkmate” in the check scenario.
B
In terms of Prior bad acts, ABSOLUTELY motive comes into play, how could it not? Remember, Baez is hurdling down the path encompassing all charges, and was not expecting this. So much so, that Lyon argues and she is not even on the docket for this case. Same with Macaluso. While you may be 100% correct, it still does not change the emergent emergency huddle that has to be going on right now.
What next?
love to 929-
B
1) DEFENSE MOTION TO PRECLUDE EVIDENCE FROM MURDER TRIAL IN FRAUD CASE http://www.docstoc.com/docs/13098974/Motion-In-Limine-To-Preclude-Introduction-of-Evidence-frm-Murder-Trial
2) DEFENSE MOTION TO PRECLUDE PRIOR BAD ACTS IN FRAUD CASE http://www.docstoc.com/docs/13099942/Motion-In-Limine-to-Exclude-Alleged-Prior-Bad-Acts
I, respectfully, I disagree. That comment was referring to the fact that the defense wanted these cases tried together, so much so they fought for that, and then to have the economics after the fact. Now that is not an option, they of course will be doing everything they can possible to “seperate” the two, I still remain puzzled as to how that is entirely possible.
ie: If the defense “opens the door”, is the state supposed to be precluded from it’s response to a fact or witness?
Oye Vey, this is definately a Silver question
B
Teri,
The horror is unimaginable. I’m sorry I typed it. I guess we’ll just never really know. I would assume, however, that the LE has an educated idea they will present at trial.
myers, one link is at wftv under the CA latest story– it takes a LOT of time to dl. You can also search docstoc.com under ‘Casey Anthony’ and search for ‘latest’. I think they are in smaller batches.
OrlandoEast is NOT, NOT Lee Anthony. In fact, many of those posts are a little too sappy to even come from Cindy.
I envision a youngster sitting in the proverbial basement of his parents home who, instead of completing homework like the parents think, is spending time inflaming the masses.
He/she is fueled by those who respond to, quote, and copy/paste his/her diatribe across the boards. There is nothing of value in OE’s post. Even Lee or Cindy would come up with more than
Casey is innocent
The persecution is out to get her
She is a good mother/person
…and, from what I’ve read, never a word about Caylee.
oops, I guess I hit submit prematurely.
I was going to end with…Normally, those people who post to get a charge out of (inflame) others usually are controlled and tempered by readers who collectively choose to ignore completely those types (OE’s) of posts.
I’m not criticizing one’s freedom of speech, but I haven’t seen anything from OE worth discussing, period! If OE was just put on ignore, we’d probably see less and less from him/her.
See how OE just sucked me in? Now I’m tinkled off!
In short, if you don’t feed the trolls, they go back under the bridge
B
Blink
Did you read the motion to exclude evidence of alleged prior bad acts (in the fraud case)?
In it, the defense mentions specifically “lying and drug use”. They also state that they want to have an evidentiary hearing prior to the trial.
Will the other numerous thefts come in (from the grandparents, Lee, Lee’s roommate, or the story about Amy sleepwalking,etc)? Or are they not mentioned in this motion because it is a no brainer that they would be too prejudicial? They seem to constitute “alleged prior bad acts”. I guess what I am trying to ask is why has the defense not specifically asked for those incidents to be excluded? They seem more damaging and relevant than an assertion of lying or drug taking.
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/document-preview.aspx?doc_id=13099942
Jeff Ashton really has a snark tone in his response to the “bad faith” allegations. I guess that it is understandable, I would prefer, however, if the tone simply remained professional.
It sounds as if the defense wants a preview of the state’s case before trial.
I think that the COV for the fraud case, beyond the obvious reasons, also serves the purpose of delaying the trial further.
I agree with you West. Baez has been very successful drawing Ashton “off sides” several times, imo, Diana Tennis got rapped for it in the civil case. I sincerely hope he factors that in when prepping for trial. That’s why I find Linda Drane Burdick so effective, she is unflappable.
B
To show how much the defense doesn’t care about any victims in this case. If they do get a change of venue for the theft charges the people involved will have to travel somewhere and possibley get hotel room. Another expense for Amy that she probably can not afford at this time. If Casey is aware of this motion for change of venue couldn’t she tell Baez….no…I don’t want to do that to Amy?
In the COv, the defense has mentioned “national attention” to the case. In their opinion , for whatever reason it is more inflammatory to opinions in Orlando. That doesn’t really cut it for me. I don’t reside anywhere near Orlando. Add to that the majority of national coverage was actually that of the defense and their position on the case. None of the national news outlets have done a thorough job of examining all of the docs released through the FL sunshine law, so most of what the defense and allies, such as the Anthonys, have said has gone largely unchallenged. In other words, they want their cake….
They also specifically mention the internet, but again, anyone with access, including interested parties in Dade may already be reading.
How many of your readers and posters are located in Orlando, do you have any kind of percentages? Just curious.
For Caylee/Casey articles, there is a large concentration, but significant multi-national stats as well, I would not trust quantifying it, but in theory, it is possible, yes.
B
I just can’t see how this “spoilation” motion can pass. Otherwise, I would think that the majority of murder cases would be tossed out. Most of the cases involve an unknown perpetrator. The police and CSI typically are on a scene before an arrest is made or a suspect ID’ed. They can not preserve evidence, in place, for the anticipation of a suspect’s experts desire to examine the scene. The suspect is given access to items collected so thatthey may perform their own testing subsequent to the collection.
Although, quite honestly, I believe that the state knew that the remains were indeed Caylee’s as soon as they were discovered .However, that would still be strictly an assumption. Without DNA testing, what if, in fact the remains were not Caylee’s ?
If the state had permitted the defense on site, and it turned out that it was a different child, and a different perpetrator, then I would think that that would have harmed the other suspect and his or her rights.
Aside from being present during an autopsy, what rights do defense attorneys & experts have to a crime scene that is actively being investigated by police? It would seem a bit dangerous to have additional individuals on scene, in terms of contamination of evidence. Isn’t the collection of evidence by police considered a ‘neutral’ act, if you will? They are looking for evidence regardless if it is exculpatory or damaging, at least in theory, right?
Blink
Another thought, that I have expressed before, how can elements of the murder case not come into the fraud trial? Amy became aware that her checks were missing because Cindy Anthony called her trying to locate Casey & Caylee. The state will surely ask her when she discovered the theft and under what circumstances. How could the judge eliminate that info from trial?
You and me both, I have no idea. I still say this check fraud case will be the catalyst to force a plea.
B
Does anyone know Amy H’s position on the fraud trial? Is she hesitant, or adamant?
Todd in Tulsa … IIRC I believe Amy is adament about the fraud trial because she allegedly stated her life has been difficult since the details regarding the fraud has come to public light. One example was she has had a hard time finding a job as a result of all the publicity. Sorry I don’t have the actual link in front of me at the moment, but I vaguely remember reading that in one of her statements. Anyone else want to comment on this?
Has there been any connection to Deputy Cain (now fired/resigned) to KC or her family? I’m wondering if that carefully planned “secret” video of Dominic Casey searching the woods (please a PI didn’t know he was being taped??? Who would hire him now??) was their (the defense) way of making sure that A. Caylees’ body had now completely decomposed, leaving little to no evidence. B. Attempting to say that there was no body there in November. C. I have always questioned the timing of GA and CA being out of time when the body was discovered, although they did travel for some interviews, most were done remotely from Orlando. Something big happened in November that caused a chain of reaction and strategy in the defense and in the Anthony behaviors.
I am in no way trying to tie in Kronk with the defense, I think he, like most of us was an avid follower of the case, and really felt he saw something, and kept dogging police until he was proven right or wrong. I believe that Cain’s treatment of him might have made him shy away for a time, and being rerouted in his job, but that he felt in his gut that he was onto something kept bringing him back. I also believe that there is much more to Lee’s story, and his sudden dissappearance from the media and immunity that we won’t know about until the trial. I feel if there is anyone in that family that still cares for Caylee, it is Lee. During her Memorial, looking at it from a different prospective, I feel that he is saying that he loves his sister, but he is going to protect and honor Caylee, by doing the right thing.
Now, blast away at any holes I may have missed, but go back and listen to his eulogy with the idea that he is telling his sister that he loves her, but he must honor Caylee and bring her justice.
You happen to be in my head abit Pamela. I re-listened to Cain’s interviews over the weekend. I do not believe he has any ties to the A’s, but I believe he is/was a dolt and deserved to be fired.
B
Also, if the defense is successful in getting a COV to, say, Miami- Dade
County, then they will be running the risk of losing that location for the murder trial. Once the fraud case is there (should it happen), the murder case might as well be brought back to Orlando, because the media will have descended on Miami to cover the fraud case.
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/13091969/Motion-For-Admission-To-Appear-Pro-Hac-Vice
If what I read here is clear, Ms Lyons will be on the defense team for the fraud trial as she states the two overlap. If so, why is the defense in their motions stating they do not want the jurors having any info on the murder trial. Wouldn’t her just being there, tell them that it is connected to the capital case trial.
Joan
I don’t think that Lyon is that famous, outside of the legal community, that every juror would know her as a DP lawyer.
Here’s what I want to know- wouldnt the release of her book be considered a reason NOT to sequester a jury?
B
#181 and #182 – Todd and Justice
Amy’s involvement is inconsequential at this point, IMO. I had an employee who forged two checks (and quit before I found out). Once I realized it, I contacted LE, gave them pertinent information, and shortly afterward they informed me that the employee had been apprehended and charged.
According to the state’s attorney, it wasn’t necessary for me to attend the hearings (I did, because I wanted to stand face-to-face), as the state had all the evidence they needed; the cancelled checks, her signatures, other paperwork I provided and ultimately, her confession. Just as it wasn’t necessary for me to be there, I also had no say when they pleaded the employee down to one felony theft vs. two (two checks).
In short, it became the State vs. the Employee (not the Company vs. Employee).
Between the bank records regarding Amy’s account and the video showing Casey’s involvement, Amy’s testimony would be to verify it was her account (the bank could also), and that she didn’t give Casey permission (it’s illegal to forge bank checks, even with permission)…Amy’s involved, of course, but not necessarily the star witness, if you know what I mean.
As disclosure, I would like to point out the extent of my legal prowess is limited to the four law books holding up my kegolator.
lol
B
“Here’s what I want to know- wouldnt the release of her book be considered a reason NOT to sequester a jury?”
Blink,
Hmm, interesting. Has her book been released already, or is she planning a more strategic time for sales as well as putting out her point of view?
On that note, though, is DR G’s show still running on the Discovery channel?
I don’t understand how the defense will explain why she is not guilty. Will they explain why she did it? Wouldn’t that then involve aspects and facts that would be part of the murder trial? She didn’t work so she needed to borrow the money from Amy. She needed the money to find Zenaida who kidnapped her child. I just don’t understand how the defense can explain her actions without bringing up prior bad acts such as lying and evidence that will be used in the murder trial. They would have the shortest opening and closing arguments in the history of any trial.
Last night on ID, one of the cases of two missing children (who allegedly disappeared right from their front yards while playing) was very interesting and had several similarities to the Anthony case regarding the defense’s approach to the case and the prosecution’s investigation. Eerily it was a case that happened years back right here in my state. Two kids were playing in their front yard out in the country when suddenly they were “missing”. The step-father called 911 and 2 mths later, the kids still were not found. After 2 mths had gone by without any traces of the two missing kids, a farmer just 12 miles away from the kid’s home happened to notice 2 skulls on the perimeter of a shaded, wooded field not far from the cemetary where his new wife’s (and the children’s bio mother) mother was buried in the cemetary. But 2 mths had past since the kids went missing and decomposition had long taken place hence no “evidence” of how the kids died.
The step-father was the person of interest but they had no proof to arrest him. The kids went missing July 9th and the step-father was arrested Sept 23rd. The home had been searched not long after the disappearance on suspicions the step-father knew something he wasn’t telling and had turned up several interesting items that revealed information. They took among other things, a blanket from the parent’s bedroom which had various plant remnants all over it (forget the name, but it helped the case as these types of little remnants weren’t found anywhere on the family property) and the pair or jeans stuffed in a closet the step-father allegedly wore that day.
The defense tried to say the bodies were long there BEFORE the step-father was arrested (sound familiar?) so LE had to prove through entomology research that the bodies were in fact there before he was arrested and in jail, which they did after Neal Haskell, Ph.D (he’s on the Caylee case too, isn’t he?), world-reknowned Forensic Entomologist from IN received the insects collected at the crime scene from LE and matched the plant remnants from the blanket and the insects found at the scene in the soil with the timeframe of mid-July which did him in. The insects found at the scene along with the plant remnants on the blanket in the home proved the step-father was the only suspect. While watching the case, I couldn’t help but notice the interesting similarities in the Anthony case to some degree and how entomology often plays such a large part in solving crimes and helping to create a timeline for LE.
That being said, I was wondering whatever happened to all the entomology info collected at the crime scene when little Caylee was found. Weren’t there turpins (and only one tree that created them in that area) in those woods also found on Casey’s car? Also the bugs and soil collected at the scene in relation to the Anthony backyard, etc? Did we ever get the results of any of that testing in any of the docs? Asking because I don’t remember seeing any although I may have missed it somehow.
Blink, silver or Kleat .. can you answer this one and confirm the entomology results being released to the public? Have they been and if not, might this be the smoking gun we’ve all been waiting for that actually ties Casey to the crime scene?
Sorry … brain cramp when writing part of the story … I meant to type the defense tried to say that the bodies of the children were put there AFTER the father was already in jail, not before. I apologize … only one cup of coffee so far this morning so not mentally functional this morning, LOL
Is all the money rolling in for photos, licensing fees etc. subject to taxes or is that Foundation protecting the money?
Why are they doing this? I don’t understand…the evidence is right there, videos, cashed checks etc…how can they possibley think they can get her out of this? Who the hell is paying for this defense team to travel and be put in hotels/meals/transportation…I just don’t get it…if any of our kids across the United States did this check fraud/theft thing would they be given the same due process, the same defense tactics. Could any kid tell their lawyer in the future, I want the same rights to counsel that Casey Anthony received?
Still cracks me up that Cain was also the June 24 missing gas can officer. (I guess it makes sense that it’s his beat or something, but for some reason it amuses me).
# 190 The entomology reports have not been released yet.
# 192-ada, I’ve asked that question before. It seems that the foundation would have to report all donations. Otherwise, the Anthonys would have to report them in income tax. It’s been a year, I wonder if there is a comprehensive report on donations through the last year. I believe non profits have to post that somewhere or make it available to anyone who asks. Although, perhaps they don’t have to release the donors names? Anyone?
#187-Key word-confession,
If the Casey plans on fighting these charges on a “misunderstanding between friends” defense strategy, then Amy will probably give a lot more testimony then simply stating that the account was hers, etc..
RE: MURDER CASE COMING IN TO THE FRAUD CASE
Comment by westsidehudson — October 13, 2009 @ 10:13 am
Blink
Another thought, that I have expressed before, how can elements of the murder case not come into the fraud trial? Amy became aware that her checks were missing because Cindy Anthony called her trying to locate Casey & Caylee. The state will surely ask her when she discovered the theft and under what circumstances. How could the judge eliminate that info from trial?
You and me both, I have no idea. I still say this check fraud case will be the catalyst to force a plea.
B
MY UNDERSTANDING IS THAT ALL THE BLAH-BLAH-BLAH ( THE GRITTY DETAILS OF I.E. CINDY TATTLING ON CASEY STEALING, CASEY AND CAYLEE GOING A.W.O.L ETC. AND ALL THE OTHER MINUTIA ) HAS ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO DO WITH THE FRAUD CASE…THE FRAUD CASE IS A BLACK AND WHITE ISSUE..
CASEY STOLE THE CHECKBOOK-AMY TESTIFIES…CASEY CASHED THE CHECKS– PROVEN BY VIDEO SURVEILLANCE..AMY,BANK OF AMERICA AND TARGET PRODUCE THE DOCUMENTATION OF CHECKS CASHED ETC…THAT IS ALL THAT IS NEEDED TO PROVE FRAUD CHARGES…THE REST IS NOT RELEVENT TO THIS CASE.
CASEY’S ACTIONS ( BEING A MURDERER, A LIAR , A CHEAT AND HO ( FOR GOOD MEASURE) HAVE ABSOULUTLEY NOTHING TO DO WHETHER OR NOT SHE FORGED CHECKS OR DEFRAUDED TARGET ,BANK OF AMERICA AND AMY HUZINNGA.
I get the concept, I think we all do, but I dont see how as a practical matter you can contain it as West so astutely pointed out, Amy did not even KNOW about her checks until Cindy picked her up and told her about the other thefts. Cindy called Casey a thief to Tone’s face. George, in his FBI interview, mentions no less than 5 different RECENT thefts from them, one of which was $4100 fake deposit. He says they have copies of all of that, If Casey defends this case, I dont see how that can come in, it goes to state of mind and motive. It does not fall under prior bad acts because she was never prosecuted.
B
I just read the questionnaire that will be used in the fraud trial. I guess they will have to go to Mars to find their jurors. This is getting really ridiculous. I see that Cynthia Anthony may be a potential witness.
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/document-preview.aspx?doc_id=13177329
Please read, apparently defense does not proof read.
Check out this horrible example of cut-and-paste from the defense. I recommend they read “Lawyering for Dummies” and grab the nearest 3rd grader for spell and grammar check before turning in such shoddy paperwork. What a disgrace!!!
Page 2, Paragraph 1 -Motion In Limine To Exclude Evidence Of Alleged Prior Bad Acts
“The only purpose of evidence of these, and potentially other, alleged prior bad acts of Miss Anthony is to attempt to show Ms. Anthony had the propensity to not properly supervise it’s students”
ROTFL, priceless..
B
#177 cindeefromwisconsin: Casey could case less, or even less than less if possible, about any inconvenience to ANYBODY,she lives, breathes, thinks and cares only about herself;all others are merely “bit players” in the grand production, “Casey’s Great Adventure:LIFE”.
On another note: the concept of preventing admission of previous bad acts and lying, guess the defense missed the detail of hard facts: a video and a check of Amy’s with Casey’s signature…that signature ALONE is a feat of “lying” as in “I have a right to sign this document as I am a “co-owner” of the backing funds”. Yep, totally agree that this flurry of judicial requests are a precursor to a plea, question being…..a plea in ALL/BOTH cases?