Casey/Caylee Anthony Case: Prosecutors Release Anthony Family Depositions
Orlando, FL– In the latest bombshell in the case against Casey Anthony, late this afternoon prosecutors released the depositions of Anthony family members George, Cindy and Lee.
In a highly unusual move, on the eve of what is arguably one of the most anticipated motion hearings to date, we will get a glimpse of exactly what the Anthony’s will be testifying to in the murder trial.
George Interview Here
Lee Interview Here
Cindy Interview Part I Here
Cindy Interview Part II Here
Prosecutors were previously granted a motion to receive the grand jury testimony of George Anthony, as there were discrepencies between the testimony he gave in that proceeding, and his deposition.
Additionally, this Saturday October 17, CBS show 48 Hours Mystery is airing what appears to be the Anthony’s defending their daughter, and her defense team touting the latest “stranger danger” theory.
Blinkoncrime.com will be posting the transcripts as soon as they become available.
Related Posts
Related Posts:
672 Comments
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
Just In:
Judge Strickland just ruled that the murder and child abuse charges WILL NOT be dropped. WFTV just announced.
What is the personal blog page in the Lee depo exhibits about? Lee answered a question that the identity of someone in a photo was his father.
Who’s page it that, what has it to do with anything? Is this woman involved with George Anthony in some way?
Bees, I just put that photo in a simple photo software that simplifies to lines (it’s not accurate, just a quick simplification view– will see if PS does better later on)– it appears that letter could be a ‘G’– Lee was asked to describe, he thought it was a C or G or O.
It seems this might be the ‘BIG TROUBLE COMES IN SMALL PACKAGES” t-shirt.
Blink,
All I can say is that the A’s remind me of “Liar, Liar, pants on fire/Hangin’ on a telephone wire?”, which is a paraphrased version of the 1810 poem “The Liar” by William Burke.
Deceiver, dissembler
Your trousers are alight
From what pole or gallows
Shall they dangle in the night?
When I asked of your career
Why did you have to kick my rear
With that stinking lie of thine
Proclaiming that you owned a mine?
When you asked to borrow my stallion
To visit a nearby moored galleon
How could I ever know that you
Intended to turn him into glue?
What red devil of mendacity
Grips your soul with such tenacity?
Will one you cruelly shower with lies
Put a pistol ball between your eyes?
What internal serpent
Has lent you his forked tongue?
From what pit of foul deceit
Are all these whoppers sprung?
Deceiver, dissembler
Your trousers are alight
From what pole or gallows
Do they dangle in the night?
It is recommended that this expression be used (shouted, actually) in situations where someone has made a statement with insufficient truth value, for example, when someone claims that solutions of tap water and milk sugar cure diseases. Its use is not recommended when the suspected liar is a pirate, jedi or ninja.
http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Liar_Liar_Pants_on_Fire
Casey Anthony asking that murder charge be dropped
October 16, 2009 12:27 EDT
ORLANDO, Fla. (AP) — A judge has dismissed a request to throw out the most serious criminal charges against a Florida mother accused of killing her 2-year-old daughter.
Circuit Judge Stan Strickled ruled Friday that a motion filed by Casey Anthony’s attorneys did not meet the requirements needed for a dismissal of the first-degree murder and aggravated child abuse charges.
In an earlier filing, Anthony’s attorneys had said the charges were based on “circumstantial and speculative” evidence.
During a brief hearing Friday, prosecutor Linda Drane Burdick said the defense attorneys’ motion was insufficient and riddled with errors.
Anthony has pleaded not guilty and says a baby sitter kidnapped Caylee. The toddler’s remains were found in December 2008, months after she was reported missing.
http://www.weartv.com/template/inews_wire/wires.regional.fl/33d1d7d2-www.weartv.com.shtml
THANK YOU, SUZ!
#90
suz:
wpgmouse, here’s a color version of Caylee wearing the Big Trouble Comes in Small Packages tee.
http://i923.photobucket.com/albums/ad79/SIGNORINABELLA1/CAYLEEINLETTERSHIRT.jpg
Could this be the woman who ‘took Caylee’ off to Atlanta on the flight out of Orlando??? Does she match the description given by WW and Investigator Lee, DNA Intern?
http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=vids.channel&channelID=43556078
(no comment on how she encourages this dog’s behaviour! Petting, consoling and rewarding that nasty attitude and telling the dog how good it is being for being nasty. I’ll rub your tummy and maybe you’ll bite me!!)
Could this ‘Jaden’s Granny’ woman know Wanda Weary? Is there a dog breeder/dog show connection?
http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=43556078
Could Jaden be the little girl who is supposedly the live Caylee???
http://74.125.95.132/search?q=cache:RNWDEagIt4UJ:blogs.myspace.com/index.cfm%3Ffuseaction%3Dblog.view%26friendId%3D43556078%26blogId%3D451886931+Jaden%27s+Granny&cd=2&hl=en&ct=clnk&client=safari
MySpace ID is ‘jean3doxie’ (doxie short for Daschund)
Cached pages link from a google search for ‘Jaden’s Granny’, the direct link does not work as the page is private, but click on ‘cached’ version vs url in the google link– posted for convenience here:
http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendid=43556078
There is a new photo album on this myspace of little girl ‘Jaden’ posted end of July 2009, maybe this was the ‘Caylee’ sighting in Orlando Airport that NO ONE BOTHERED TO INVESTIGATE (according to Cindy and Wanda– ranting to media about no one looking for a live Caylee– right!! Investigators found the child from the manifest IIRC– maybe this is the child?
Many links for Caylee too.
Jean Brewer (Jaden’s granny) made a blog entry on July 24, 2009 titled ‘One Year Ago Today’. I can’t view it– page set to private but also I am not a MySpace user. Interesting to know if she mentioned missing Caylee– would the flight from Orlando and the dog show weekend, been a route to take back to Knoxville TN?
Jean Brewer is 53 years old, her last login was yesterday the 15th. She is between George and Cindy’s ages. Could she be confused with Mrs. Grund?
What, if any, is the connection to George Anthony as per Lee depo exhibit page for this woman? Was this woman related to George (first marriage perhaps?)
This couldn’t be– naw– the child on the Orlando-Atlanta flight– the granddaughter of George by a first marriage?? (not saying– but Lee said a man in a photo in the exhibits was his father)
Blink….
so– if MySpace has ‘cached versions’– could it be that the photos deleted by Lee could have survived in ‘cache’ form in some unallocated (or such) space out in MySpace server land?? That would be great– then deleted photos that anyone else did earlier, might also be recoverable by drafting suitable legal paperwork?
Strickland also granted a request by prosecutors that defense attorneys turn over evidence they found in their own investigation. They have until February 1 to do so or explain why they can’t.
Previously, one defense attorney said Casey’s lawyers have evidence that can prove their client is innocent.
Last week, prosecutors released more evidence in the case, including pictures of a tattoo on Anthony’s back and duct tape, which was located on her daughter Caylee Anthony’s body.
Caylee Anthony’s remains were found in December 2008, months after she was reported missing.
Casey has pleaded not guilty. She says a baby sitter kidnapped Caylee.
The state wants the death penalty for Casey, who remains in the Orange County Jail.
http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/local/story/Judge-wont-dismiss-charges-against-Casey-Anthony/ja3HjNYxp066W5QsRG_Vyg.cspx
suz
http://i923.photobucket.com/albums/ad79/SIGNORINABELLA1/CAYLEEINLETTERSHIRT.jpg
WHAT IS THAT SIGNORINABELLA1?
Is that the original title CA assigned to the pic?
If it is, woah… Bella Vita tattoo link.
Is there a way to get the “original date created” of a photobucket image or the date in was first posted?
#60 … How does Jose Baez tell Cindy to say or do anything??? He’s not her attorney! Do they not understand that? It seems to me that Jose’s got 2 extra clients that no one knows about — Rosebud and Georgie-poo.
PS to Jean’s Myspace info– ‘Brewer’ seems to be her last name, ‘Brewster’ is the name of her special little ‘friend’ (aka alpha male in the Brewer pack).
Jaden also seems to be a well travelled little girl, indications she was off to Germany on a trip– so she could have easily travelled to Orlando on a flight without fuss if she was used to travel, or preparing for a long trip.
Blink: FL. Statute:905.27 Testimony not to be disclosed; exceptions.–
(1) A grand juror, state attorney, assistant state attorney, reporter, stenographer, interpreter, or any other person appearing before the grand jury shall not disclose the testimony of a witness examined before the grand jury or other evidence received by it except when required by a court to disclose the testimony for the purpose of:
(a) Ascertaining whether it is consistent with the testimony given by the witness before the court;
(b) Determining whether the witness is guilty of perjury; or
(c) Furthering justice.
(2) It is unlawful for any person knowingly to publish, broadcast, disclose, divulge, or communicate to any other person, or knowingly to cause or permit to be published, broadcast, disclosed, divulged, or communicated to any other person, in any manner whatsoever, any testimony of a witness examined before the grand jury, or the content, gist, or import thereof, except when such testimony is or has been disclosed in a court proceeding. When a court orders the disclosure of such testimony pursuant to subsection (1) for use in a criminal case, it may be disclosed to the prosecuting attorney of the court in which such criminal case is pending, and by the prosecuting attorney to his or her assistants, legal associates, and employees, and to the defendant and the defendant’s attorney, and by the latter to his or her legal associates and employees. When such disclosure is ordered by a court pursuant to subsection (1) for use in a civil case, it may be disclosed to all parties to the case and to their attorneys and by the latter to their legal associates and employees. However, the grand jury testimony afforded such persons by the court can only be used in the defense or prosecution of the civil or criminal case and for no other purpose whatsoever.
(3) Nothing in this section shall affect the attorney-client relationship. A client shall have the right to communicate to his or her attorney any testimony given by the client to the grand jury, any matters involving the client discussed in the client’s presence before the grand jury, and any evidence involving the client received by or proffered to the grand jury in the client’s presence.
Blink, all, there you have it. All of the above apply:
1. Purjury.
2. Consistent.
3. Furthering justice.
Perhaps this exception is lessor known because few are they who have purjured themselves, or been more inconsistent than the Anthonys. As for furthering justice? That would speak for itself, it would seem to me. Let’s start slapping them with charges to force truthful testimony.
Thanks, Gabe Grasso, should you be lurking here.
Call it a side note:
FSS: 905.28 Publication of report or presentment; motion to repress.–
(1) A report or presentment of the grand jury relating to an individual which is not accompanied by a true bill or indictment is confidential and exempt from the provisions of s. 119.07(1) and s. 24(a), Art. I of the State Constitution and shall not be made public or be published until the individual concerned has been furnished a copy thereof and given 15 days to file with the circuit court a motion to repress or expunge the report or that portion which is improper and unlawful.
(2) Any such motion, whether granted or denied, shall automatically act as a stay of public announcement of such report, or portion thereof, until the circuit court’s ruling on the motion is either affirmed or denied by the district court of appeal or, if no appeal is taken, until expiration of the period within which an appeal could have been taken.
History.–s. 1, ch. 73-132; s. 1, ch. 73-194; s. 1, ch. 77-174; s. 3, ch. 94-74; s. 435, ch. 96-406
Marinade Dave // October 16, 2009 at 1:08 pm
I was in awe that the judge singled me out. I will tell you later what he said, but I will say that I was extremely honored.
http://marinadedave.wordpress.com/2009/10/16/a-great-day-for-courting/
I’m sitting in a hospital room connected to the Internet. I won’t have a chance to write an article until later, but BOY! Do I have a story to tell.
http://marinadedave.wordpress.com/2009/10/16/a-great-day-for-courting/
I don’t think I can read anymore. This whole group has selective
AMNESIA:
It is remarkable the amount of detail that they can recall about nonsense (small talk) or dirt on others, while they feign minimal recall regarding what they said was their main focus: Caylee and all circumstances surrounding her disappearance or what Casey said.
INVISIBLE DAUGHTER:
I know I might be shot for this, but in a way I feel sorry for Casey. How concerned, caring or involved can you be as a parent, if 1. you don’t know until the last moment that your kid isn’t graduating high school?
2.You don’t know (even having that adult child, living under your roof in a small house) who your daughter’s friends are, who her boyfriends are, where she is working, or not, who is watching your granddaughter and how to contact them?
3.Cindy says that Casey was her best friend, but she couldn’t figure out that she was pregnant?
4 That Casey began stealing checks all the way back since high school and continued doing this, yet, there was never any sign that she needed psychological evaluation or at least some disciplinarian action?
Was she acting out because she was invisible to these people?
She had to be because they had no idea where she was, who she was, or what she was doing or involved….sad.
involved in….correction
One more thing…RANT still ensuing
48 hours defends the program on Saturday as “balanced” from both sides.
That’s not possible because no one from the prosecution will be speaking.
They believe that their “balance” is achieved by interviewing Jesse Grund, John Morgan, and Dianne Fanning. Last I’ve heard none of these people represent the state, but have personal agendas that are not necessarily that as advocate for the victim.
MY FELLOW BLINKER:
CAN YOU LEAD ME TO WHERE THIS INFO WAS FOUND PLEASE WITH SUGAR ON TOP
THANKS CHICA
Comment by westsidehudson — October 16, 2009 @ 9:47 am
Cindy listens through the door and believes she hears a conversation between Tony & Casey and says they had a “plan” and something about
$ 14,000.00. Anyone get where this was going?
westsidehudson, I feel a bit sorry for George. He seemed to have been sincerely concerned about Casey’s behavior, and wished to deal with Casey a few times, but Cindy would cut him off, repeatedly, stating she would take care of Casey, like she took care of the car that she remained alone with, after George returned to work, at Cindy’s insistence, and until such time as she went in search of Casey, At around 7:00 p.m., and that was for some 3 hours or so that she had sole access to the car, no? Much can be done to evidence in a vehicle in three hours time, don’t ‘cha know. Seems Cindy ruled George, Casey ruled Cindy, Lee’s just wishywashy, makes one think they have some serious dirt on one another that keeps each of them from doing the right thing.
It only takes dear, old George a little while before his own attempt at revisionist Anthony family history trips him up. He says on page 40 that his midnight shift job at the Centroplex, Orlando Oreno, allowed him to both walk Casey to Elementary school and meet her when she got out of school through at least the fourth grade. On page 53, the prosecutor points out to him that later states his night job employment ended and he began working a day shift at Snappy Rental Car when Casey was about 7 or 8.
Unless Casey was held back for a couple of years in kindergarten, he would no longer be able to monitor her trips to a from school after the time she was in the first or second grade. I think there is a pathological lying gene that runs in both sides of the family.
Oh what a tangled web we weave…
117. Chica, you’re in the hospital? Or Dave is in the hospital? He had health issues, so let me know! If it’s you, what are you doing there?
Anyway we can out Ashley Banfield’s so called “I cluded into the missing dot on Casey’s tat’ claims? She’s lying to her audience. No wonder we can’t trust most reporters and their sources. Am I the only one who’s enraged?
I missed it but heard about it, anyone see anything on her blog?
B
#120
Personally, as much as I am dying to watch Saturday’s 48 hours, for Caylee’s sake, I’ll put in a movie and avoid endorsing the Anthony’s at all costs. My curiosity doesn’t need to be satisfied that desperately.
#112 Westside…something very off about the no graduation business. Counselors, teachers and administrators would never wait until two days before graduation to inform parents that their child is not graduating. No way in hell. Parents sue for this kind of stuff. I know of parents threatening lawsuits because of a single grade which kept their child from receiving a 4.0! This whole graduation story is ridiculous.
I would assume Colonial High has a very different story and LE knows all about what happened to poor Casey being shafted at graduation. George mentions that Casey was one/half credit short –”or something” in English — he doesn’t know ANYTHING! Can’t recall why his child didn’t graduate and can’t remember why she never made up the credits.
Casey , no doubt finagled her grade card to straight A’s, pocketed any mail from the school to home, or fended the telephone calls which counselors are required to make… well in advance… of any graduation problems with a student.
Or Casy masy have just given Cindy this CLUE: “Ask me no questions and I’ll tell you no half-truths.” Cindy existed well under those strictures!
This family thinks that they are so clever, so elite that mere mortals can’t discern the lay of the land on Hopespring. Gack!
#123 I’m certainly not excusing George. He should stand up and be a man! He no doubt attempted to do that the night Casey was brought home without Caylee. Cindy interfered, lest he may well have busted ass! But anyway, I think George is scared to death. Of Cindy! He so wants to please Cindy! Everything’s Cindy, Cindy, Cindy, and if not Cindy, then Casey, Casey, Casey. I’m still of the mindset that eventually George will break. What do you think?
# 121-Chica, It’s in part 2 of Cindy Anthony’s interview. I already trashed the PDF. Use your search function for “plan” or “$ 14,000.00″, or go to the last pages of the index on the PDF, where the occurrence of words are listed alphabetically and look up “Tony”, “Plan” or “phone”,something like that. It will lead you to the corresponding # and line. But note: the # will be at the top right corner of the page and is not the same as the page # at the center bottom.
Can someone please enlighten me as to what Baez and his pathetic clown-of-a-sidekick Crasey find so amusing in court this morning? Apparently Crasey doesn’t think this applies to her, otherwise, why find ANY of this funny?
Ms. Linda Drane-Burdick spoke up for CAYLEE this morning, where Judge Strickland was hell-bent on protecting George and Cindy and Casey as family members who might not want the photos of Caylee’s body.
What the heck was Judge Strickland thinking– he recognized that Baez’s client IS next of kin, then he looks for Brad Conway in the gallery and asks HIM if he has any objection, he says no, of course– then, after considering the needs of George and Cindy through Conway, he comments the followingquote:
“This is not a case like Ernhart, where the family was over here saying ‘don’t do this’…
and state your principle objection is just that the nature of the photos and to protect the family, even though they are on the other side of the fence, right?”
Ms. Drane-Burdick’s RESPONSE! Good for Ms. DB!!! Thank you for taking this position– as close as Caylee has in the courtroom to a GLA!!!
“NO, actually my position is NOT to protect the family its to protect the CHILD…”
(from commercialism of her photos after death– judge agreed that would be not good)
Judge responds– “Well, that’s PART of the family” (does judge Strickland think the only thing of importance is the feelings of living family? I’m sure that is not what he intended, but does he realize that Brad Conway is a negotiator of substantial media deals for his client, Cindy Anthony (as apparently per her state depo which I haven’t read yet– but was alluded to in Lee’s depo by the state questioner)
DB NO, actually my position is Not to protect the family its to protect the CHILD’
I’m only on P. 30 of Lee’s transcript and don’t know if I’ll be able to finish it – tooooooo much exactly, absolutely and you know! It makes my eyes bleed!!!!!!!!
SHELLY!! Where are you?? Did you see who was in the court gallery this morning????
I thought I recognized MarinadeDave sitting there, and at the end of the hearing, Judge Strickland is overheard on his ‘off the record’ remarks, asking his deputy (or someone off camera) to notice the fellow in the grey striped shirt, as he was in the courtroom, and he would like to meet with him, so asked that he be brought to meet the judge.
Great work, Shelly, for suggesting/encouraging more from Mr. M-D !!!
Di Dirkle– expect it to take awhile! That’s why I posted a few comments with page refs, for anyone wanting not to read the whole thing in one go!! To get a bit of an idea of some of the strangest of strange in that depo.
It does take a few hrs to get through. (I haven’t even started on the others yet– except to take a look at what exhibits they included and to see if they were the same as for Lee’s depo)
(ps: Lee answers the question of what the tat was about– but his explanation was a bit lacking– just that Caylee liked nightime and the stars basically)
#128 MsEnscene —I’m getting the vapors today! (lol)
No doubt Casey concealed what was going on. But how closely are you following your kid’s progress and life, if you find out on the day that you are setting up a graduation party that s/he isn’t graduating? Didn’t they ask to see report cards, occasionally speak to teachers or counselors directly? It’s as if they didn’t want to hear anything. Also, if Casey stole Lee’s checks in high school, what did she need to spend the money on? All of it seemed to be washed aside, provided there was a comforting word from Casey, or a reassurance that it wouldn’t happen again. It’s like they are perpetually “absent” for negative or bad news.
suz
Someone cropped this image. Can you get into the photobucket album and see if there is a full version?
Lee A. got caught so off guard by Drane Burdick with her line of questioning … him “deleting” pictures from Caseys MySpace account within a couple days after July 16 and some funny business on a “private” Casey MySpace that he admitted CASEY STILL HAS ACCESS TO.
He claims he can’t remember the new password (he changed it himself from timer55). Right.
Drane Burdick: Does she still have a MySpace page that – -
LA: Yes.
Drane Burdick: Could it be accessed?
LA: Yes. I don’t know who’s really using it right now, if anybody’s even signing onto it any more. I don’t know, but I’m pretty sure it’s probably private and all this other stuff, but – - but I know she has one.
Drane Burdick: Have you checked it recently?
(this depositon was July 30,2009)
LA: “Well, and, yeah. That’s what I was going to say. The reason why I know she has it because I just signed on to MySpace maybe two weeks ago for the first time since, like January and Casey was, you know, I told you top friend thing. She was, you know, my number one friend on there. And I was, like, I just said, you know, we’re not using this page – - or, no. I take that back. ”
There was like, an old – - an old old bulletin or something like that that says, you know, this account is no longer going to be used, or something like that.
Drane Burdick: Um-hum.
LA: So I was just, like, well, this is kind of pointless of me keeping it on here. So I just – - I just removed it as a friend. but I’m sure it’s still up or I know it was at least about two weeks ago.”
2 weeks ago would like July 15, 2009. 2009! So, what the heck? Casey still has access to the private account?
Has she been posting or have her and the A’s been communicating all along? Wow.
And when Drane Burdick showed him the print out of Caylee in the pink t-shirt, well… worth another the read. Drane Burdick’s direct begins on page 352.
Oh, Drane Burdick is good, so very, very good. With her entire direct you can see where she is going with him.
But that picture of little Caylee is still very disturbing. What else is visible within the fuller picture … who took it and how… where was it taken … and WHEN was it taken.
She is so steady, I completely agree. She will try this case, if necessary, to a successful prosecution.
I recommend listening to Annie Downing depo ( compelled) if your looking for it, her acumen resonates.
B
On Part II of Cindy’s transcript at page 318 it appears there are missing pages from the WFTV site. Were those pages not provided to the public or did WFTV leave them out? The transcript just kind of stops mid sentence while they are squabbling over something on a piece of paper. Are these posted anywhere else where the pages after that might be listed? The table of contents lists the deposition going to page 590. Page 318 of that PDF is listed as page 500 of the total document. Anyone seen those other 90 pages posted anywhere?
Someone asked what all the laughing was about– (sorry, can’t look back to see who asked… )
Judge Strickland: “…whose courtroom is this?…. I’ve never seen so much handcream in all my life!… good grief!”
The defense being so obsessed about not being allowed at the site where little Caylee’s remains were found makes me wonder – Why? Do any of you think they could have planted a newspaper or something like that with an early December date under the remains? They could have known Kronk searched there often so they knew he’d find it within days. (Especially if they made it a little more visible.) If that were true they’re probably wondering what happened to their little “trick”. I hope this did happen and LE is just waiting for them to expose themselves.
There goes my crazy imagination again. Sorry!
Some state it’s impossible NOT to know your kid won’t be graduating. That isn’t true. It happened to me. We found out the day before graduation that my daughter could walk but wouldn’t receive a diploma. My daughter was involved in a bad car wreck the 1st day of senior year. She had to get an IEP but her school refused to follow because she was from a private prep school. My daughter was tutored every school day of that that year in Spanish but the teacher decided she wouldn’t give her the 2 extra points to pass her. So we were all cheering for my daughter but the teacher wasn’t. We found out in a cold letter the day before graduation. So that statement cannot be true.
Can someone tell me why the Judge feels the need to consult with Brad Conway on some things involving this case. It kind of makes me mad to think that Casey (an adult) has been charged with the first degree murder of her daughter. But for whatever reason, Casey’s parents’ thoughts and feelings have an impact on this case. I don’t understand why. I can’t recall other murder cases where a lot of it was about the (alleged) murderer’s parents and their involvement. Am I missing something? Why do they have a say in anything? I must be studpid because I just don’t get it.
I am so with you, and I choose to look past it.
B
The best part today was when the state said they were protecting not the family, but Caylee. I let out a “whoopee” right here. Hubby just shook his head.
AGREED. I L O V E D that response. Ms. Drane Burdick is so competent. She has my full support, and I believe she will lead a successful prosecution in this case.
B
I thought that was Dave, lol. Cracked me up to see him there.
I’m sure there will be more, but my new favorite “an Anthony using the wrong big word again”… on page 121 of Lee’s transcript, after being asked if Casey cries often… “Not really that I was ever pertinent to.” pertinent? huh? hehehe
Time to CLICK-OFF (not click ON) wdbo or click orlando website as this is a big CBS 48 hrs promotion, trying to entice viewers to watch. The promo clips are same-old, same-old– nothing new, nothing at all. Anyone expecting anything revealing who is paying attention to the recent docs and court arguments, will, I’ll bet, be disappointed.
Waiting (not even going near Cindy’s fav click orlando/wdbo site) and staying off the CBS site too– will join Blink watching the YouTubes next week or whenever they come out– UNLESS the Sweeps considers those hits– they MIGHT– it’s easy to count.
(besides, who has time to watch the same old cbs Anthony and defense stuff, when there’s the transcripts to get through!)
Say– the Caylee photo in the exhibits, with the possible ‘BIG’ (trouble comes small…) t-shirt, was likely at a bit earlier age? Seems so– bangs shorter, maybe roundness in her face and hands.
So– was this t-shirt too small for Caylee to be wearing last summer? Was it something that was a ‘message’– Lee said in his depo, that Casey often used ‘writing’ to give cryptic messages (moreso than verbal clues).
MsEncene, i dunno, I knew a kid in military school and his parents drove all the way up for his graduation (dragging my brother, his old friend, along) only to find out, after the multi-hour drive, that the kid had flunked something and wouldn’t be graduating. Of course, this was longer ago than Casey’s non-graduation, but I reckon it still can happen.
Does anyone remember the date that Lyons was approved to be on this case?
What a poorly written Motion the defense wrote. Someone obviously didn’t read the cases they referenced to find “case law.” Kathi was a gem when she asked Lyons if her students were preparing the Motions. Indigant, Lyons said, “You’re joking, right.” To which Miss Kathi replied, “Well, no I’m not.” (my paraphrase)
Good thing I can’t come through the screen cause I would have planted one right on top of Miss Kathi’s head.
Lol
Your kinder than I.
I would have asked her how the supervision of her students by Casey is going.. lol
B