Caylee/Casey Anthony Case: A Gruesome Anniversary Plays Out in Court
Disclaimer– exclusive original content copyright and property of Internet Network News, LLC and Blinkoncrime.com. Reproduction of this article , ANY OF IT’S CONTENTS, in whole or in part without proper attribution and source link is strictly prohibited without prior written permission.
Orlando, FL– On the eve of the one year anniversary of the recovery of 34 month old Caylee Marie Anthonys remains; the defense team representing the woman charged with her murder is preparing for one of the most difficult court appearances to date.
Tomorrow, one year ago, Caylee was found while her grandparents and Team Casey dined on crab puffs and lounged pool side at the Ritz.
Among the Ritz Carlton guests, courtesy of ABC, was the Anthony Family Private Investigator, Dominic Casey.
Mr. Casey is attempting to don the “Privilege Parka” and avoid an upcoming deposition scheduled for December 16 and of course subsequent testimony at trial. The State has issued subpoenas to both George and Cindy Anthony for tomorrow’s hearing. They are looking to sit in front of the bar.
Might be advisable given the circumstances. I suggest a single malt of humility with a dignity chaser.
By his own account, George Anthony has not seen or spoken to Dominic Casey since February 10, 2009.
It is not known if perhaps Baez never took the time to explain to Mr. Casey the definition of “privilege”.
It is not that
he would get the “privilege” of schtupping his Clients wife while their baby granddaughter was missing and later found murdered in the area his Client*slash*PillowPal sent him to search a month earlier.
O yeah, I went there.
If he is stupid enough through his attorney Diana Tennis to continue the privilege party line I predict Ms. Drane Burdick will be well prepared to demonstrate her skills in verbal guillotine simply by using Dom’s own words. I am not a huge Dr. Phil fan I admit, but there is a quote from him I feel resonates for Cindy Anthony specifically:
If he will do it with ya, he will do it to ya. 100%
Cindy, when you read this, you know I come from a place of knowledge and there are some doors even you do not want opened.
Mountainous Motionous Interruptus
To Deluge is to Delude? That is the Question.
It is unclear if Ms. Lyon and the Baez jesters get paid by the word in their motions, or if they own stock in the local optometrist.
What is clear, is they have an endless supply of ink for the laser jet.
Could that be because they have not put out the benjamens for the bevy of experts we were expecting from the hearing about who is funding this shindig?
Even the dubious Dr. Lee is on record saying he does not get out of bed until the next check. *snark alert*
How do you ask for a year to prepare for a trial and not list a single expert as a witness, or lob a smidge of discovery back over the net?
Is February 1st the BIG BAEZ REVEAL? ( Insert laugh track)
Yesterday, Prosecutor Linda Drane Burdick returned fire, exposing what appears to be some seriously shoddy defense tactics to open up the files of the almost 4000 Texas Equusearch Volunteers in response to the mountains of motions filed by the defense the day before Thanksgiving.
..”Appreciate the Reciprocate not the Procrastinate or you Violate..”
Blink
Got it straight?
(editors note: see how easy that is, A to the L? One line and will free you up for those lovely, no advance blush necessary speaking engagements.)
“Dialing for Disgruntled”
It is not surprising or original to learn that Andrea Lyon and Jose Baez et al have spent weeks calling through TES search rosters to find anyone that would talk to them voluntarily. Many have. Baez and team apparently thought they hit pay-dirt with Joe Jordan and Laura Buchanan.
Joe Jordan was a volunteer on the first search in Orlando for Caylee Anthony. He also broke his agreement with TES by posting Youtube videos of the search and blogging about locations and findings. It was a serious no no and when he was outed, he began his campaign to speak negatively about Tim Miller and TES.
In the defense’s motion to modify access to TES records, Mr. Jordan claims to have kept very detailed records of his search efforts, when his team of 5–6 members were searching the alleged “exact area” where Caylee was ultimately found. For me, when someone uses the word detailed, I make the assumption that entails having more than one name of the other 5 people:
..”Among the five people with me were Danny Ibison and his dog, and a Panama City Deputy with one of his two dogs…”
Within the search form Jordan alleges he provided to TES, it would REQUIRE the names and ID’s of the individuals searching that area.
Could it be that Ibison and the others would not support Jordan’s statement because the area, exact area, where Caylee’s remains were found, was underwater on September 1st?
Speaking on the condition of anonymity exclusively to blinkoncrime.com, a source within OCSO confirms just that. Ibison maintains the site was underwater, the as- yet-unamed- publicly “deputy” will confirm there were meetings within TES to come up with a solution to use some sort of aquatic equipment to search the submerged area, but it was considered too dangerous and too small for a boat.
What motive would Mr. Jordan have to (un-surreptitiously to him) record his interview with Morty?
JJ records the audio for a spell and then gets around to calling Det. Edwards at OCSO to ostensibly get a high five.
That high five was nearly a low five behind his back from the state for a 3rd degree wiretapping felony.
Wait for it….. AND he is “materially” changing his story after apparently being schooled about what happens when you are prepared to lie in court, regardless of your agenda.
There is no “I” in perjury. Look out Baez, someone is out of there FUGUE state in time for tomorrow.
If I were a betting gal, I would say that Lyon will not lead with asking Ms. Drane Burdick where she picked out her suit or what she has in her nightstand drawer.
However, I do believe that an excerpt or 3 from Andea Lyon’s stand up impersonation of Lisa Lampanelli may end up on the record.
All that aside, I am humbled by tomorrow’s anniversary I thought I would never see. I will never forget the call in which both joy and anguish filled my throat. “We got her, it’s her.”
To the FBI, FDLE, FBI CSI, OCSO CSI, SS and OCSO, 9th Circuit Medical Examiners Office, Dr. G and SH– You know who you are– From the bottom of my heart I thank you for the commitment you showed this child.
You are her sweet voice now, backed by your collective baritone.
I am hopeful for an anti-crescendo or dimiuendo, directed to the finale.
If that does not work, then we scrap. End is the Same. Justifies the Means.
Images by Klaasend
Related Posts
Related Posts:
1,058 Comments
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
I’m sorry if I offended anyone here with the video I posted.(I admit it was in poor taste) I am dumbfounder by Joy Wrays behavior and how she has inserted herself into this case, and continues to do so by following the Anthoneys around in court and such. Sending Judge Strickland a letters and appearing in front of the TV cameras with her son twice is very strange to say the least. Joy Wray obviously she has some issues. Blink please pull the Utube clip if you feel the need. Enough people seem to be taking advantage of her, maybe she really cant help herself?
NT, that questionare is amazing. That was before the internet(bloggers) and PC’s. I can imagine the length of a questionare like that these days.
I have no comment on the latest and video from JWW
alegna, no offense on my end, it just verifies everything that has said about the situation…no worries!
a “been” was supose to go in there somewhere
Alegna, no, not offended! You are right, this behaviour was not appropriate and I’d not care anything, but for her risking her children. I too, saw that video, I think I even may have mentioned it’s existence in an earlier post, but with a ‘WARNING” (aka SNARK about that ‘warning’ as much as anything). It was pulled shortly thereafter from JWW’s site.
Yes, it shows her inability to handle things, and this video could well have been her ‘Geraldo show’ undoing as her lawyer took some control (presumably) and got the videos off her YouTube.
Not at all upset with you, that video has just resurfaced with some promo in the last couple days on a new site. They have to help this woman help her children– someone has to.
The spoofer needs to learn to ‘edit’ her ideas if she is going down this path. If you read back on my posts, I also ‘snarked’ at JWW’s possible Geraldo, and thought a tour headed by JWW of NYC would be more interesting– bologne sandwich and votive candle lighting in St. Pats (hundreds of candles– would take her HOURS to light them all).
Room for humour yes, I can’t really condemn that because I did this remark too, but I do worry about her children’s exposure, and the editorial decisions of WESH, for example, to go with JWW and her son given the circumstances and what they do know about her.
ChicagoJudy, there’s JWW herself, and her husband. Kronk is the tip of the blame-burg– a lot more beneath the surface than on top, all related of course, to LE not doing their job and only focussing on poor Casey because the only thing she did wrong, was not report her daughter missing in 31 days. (aaakkkk)
How is it that Casey can’t say who did this, STILL? Oh yeah– they’re still tweeking that story aka defense.
WSH, but in the judge’s order for the protective order re: ‘attorney video’ and it’s release, doesn’t meantion anything about ‘family’ video, which isn’t an ‘attorney’ visit or even a pastor visit, so how can this be protected under the ‘attorney video’ decision? Must be a separate issue. Maybe the judge didn’t set both issues as separate, and lumped them together, saying he would review the videos before any release– why would he need to review Attorney visit videos if they are protected in the first place?
Still confused– (maybe Silver can explain why the judge only refers to the attny videos, and not any other, in that latest motion to deny attorney videos that he will review first to make sure they can be released without prej?)
What I find hilarious is even though the judge is going to review the family visit videos and block their release should they be an issue to her right to a fair trial…but the Anthonys will not know what the judge will decide regarding each tape so what they might THINK wouldn’t be released just might be released!!! So, I am betting the “No visit” rule will remain intact.
Comment by Kleat — December 18, 2009 @ 4:52 pm
Not entirely sure Kleat. But as Silver said, no video of a lawyer and client would ever be released, so I’m thinking that it was “lumped” together.
http://www.wesh.com/news/21984238/detail.html
WSH, I am guessing from this article the judge has yet to rule on that portion.
From WESH Site:
Also denied was a motion to destroy all jailhouse interviews involving Casey Anthony and her family and friends. Anthony’s defense argued that the tapes have created “legions of prejudice” in the pool of potential jurors.
What Strickland has yet to rule on is whether tapes of Casey Anthony’s future family visits will be held back and their release blocked.
Kleat,
I flagged most of JWW’s youtubes the days they came out. Most of them have been pulled. I also sent her a message telling her to not put her children in any future videos. She replied with…I love my children, I watch them every minute of the day, and they are never out of my sight. I explained to her that there kooks, and perverts just looking for their next victims (children) I’m pretty sure she doesn’t have a clue and I wasted my energy, but I tried, FWIW.
Alegna, here’s support for us to learn about ‘who’ JWW is, from Ms. Silverspnr herself. Valhall has just posted a ‘who is JW’ with criminal record.
There is value in that video of JWW (WrongWray Joy) that you linked to, because it showed her close to present day behaviours (last week or so on her own site). As Silver points out (and this is one credible legal eagle poster and friend of BlinkonCrime), the more people who understand ‘who’ she is, the better.
The defense has set her up for this high public profile, it’s not all her own doing I’m convinced of that, as she has found her way into the cell phone directory of Bob of WESH, and into the court rooms of the Anthony case, into the home of the Anthony’s, and into the Papa Geo hugs of George Anthony, and into ‘the Cindy is crying protect her from the media’ elevator hallway huddle.
There is a reason that JWW was not named and her sworn statement, not attached to the defense Motion along with the other two searchers. They had no trial use for this woman, but they could try the ‘public spin’ and keep winding her up and letting her spin off her story to the media and to whomever would listen.
In this sense, it’s important for people to see what JWW is about, to know what an incredible witness she is, and what credible witness, she never will be.
In this sense, we have to thank Beaconhell for keeping that video alive to illustrate the behaviour, JWW would not have referenced her daughter if not prodded to do so by a cocoa spoof– cocoa, if you must, how about let’s leave the children out of it, even JW’s are innocent, pure and simple. The video is a bit dark on JWW’s webcam, people might mistake it for a spoof, which it is not. I think also, at the risk of ‘encouraging JWW’, Marinade Dave too, has exposed JWW, and in the view from behind the MSM, we can see Bob Kealing’s ‘real’ reaction to this woman’s credibility as ‘anything’, nevermind truthful witness.
BTW, I love a well-done spoof and this is one of the best and so appropo today, as the pre-Christmas hearing and motions pressies and stocking-stuffers, were all stolen away, never to be recovered:
Of course, the lyrics were written by a master– and the colour of the low neck sweater, matches perfectly, and Jim Carey’s expressions are unsurpassed in the classic Seuss evil to be converted by the tiniest little Who cherub (will this be a premonition of things to come with our little cherub Caylee? Will the spirit of Christmas break down the grinch-green to mellow yellow?)
It’s only a week ’til the Grinch does Christmas again, and I can’t have people thinking I don’t like good, well-done humour!! (again!)
http://bigmouthshelly.wordpress.com/2009/04/29/cindy-is-the-grinch-parody/
I keep hearing that Baez & Lyons ‘didn’t expect’ their motions 5to be granted. If that’s the case when you have low expectations you won’t be disappointed. But I’m sure they had to hope that against all odds the DP would be taken away. They had to be hoping for the best outcome on these motions, Lyons after all thinks she’s the angel of death row. I want them to be deeply upset today since the last of the motions were denied. Wouldn’t they have to be pretty bummed out…especially Casey & the Anthonys? And if anything else wouldn’t ‘the dream team’s’ e4go be shattered right now?
Alegna, to save Blink having yet another JWW video posted here (understand our Blink has MET and seen IN ACTION this woman and her behaviours), there is one more recent video that this ‘SEARCHER for MISSING CHILDREN’ has posted, in which she does not use her own children nor anyone else’s, but she laughs and jokes about searching for missing children, when it’s not anywhere near the video topic, she’s simply making fun of her ‘obsession to search’.
I posted the link in the comments at http://www.thehinkymeter.com under the appropriate story– about Joy and her ‘record’. This video, which talks about her activity of searching for ‘missing kids’ should be part of this ‘record’.
I think it is sad this discussion is about JWW, she is nothing in regards to this case, it is totally uncalled for. It is sad if Baez and team are trying to set her up as a supporter…she has nothing to gain here. If that is all they have then surely their defense is weaker than I first thought, we need not give these kind of idiots (said in the kindess of fashion) the time of day. we need to just let her fade away quietly….IMHO
Thank You, I must have missed where it was posted already. It was funny in a sick twisted kind of way. And I had forgotten she was trying to get on the Geraldo show to. I wonder if she is doing this on her own accord, or is someone encouraging her from the sidelines?
Maybe someone should alert CPS.
George and Cindy Antony’s Body Language on the Today Show Indicates They Are Feigning Denial and Know Daughter Casey is Guilty
Dr. Lillian Glass Body Language Expert Dec. 17, 2009
CINDY AND GEORGE MUST CLAIM SOME RESPONSIBILITY FOR ALLOWING CASEY’S BAD BEHAVIOR IN THE PAST
I have always found Cindy Anthony’s yelling, belligerence, anger, rudeness, obnoxious and inappropriate gum chewing, manipulation, and hostility extremely offensive. While my dear friend Nancy Grace, who’s show on which I regularly appear on Headline News cuts Cindy a lot of slack just because she is a parent and is defending her daughter, I refuse to do so.
Full article:
http://www.drlillianglass.com/blog/
Silver, quoted from her comment to Valhall’s article JWW’s ‘Rap Sheet’:
“In any event-
Yes. No one has any use for Joy Wray IN COURT. It is apparent that the Anthonys have use for her in the meantime, however, so the more people learn of her character (criminal record) and her mental health picture, the better.
Keep up the brilliant work.”
This is just an observational comment. It is obvious that on Nancy Grace’s show, she defends Cindy and George. My question/comment would be, how can she be of that superior opinion, when guests, primarily Leonard Padilla, who saw first hand of what everything was like in the Anthony home directly following him bailing Casey out of jail under the agreement that Casey would assist in searching for Caylee, but instead, sat around watching tv and doing other self-serving duties, how can she be of that opinion when Padilla has been there, but Nancy Grace has not? Why even bother having Padilla as a guest if all she’s going to do is pose objections at any and every turn?
Mise-en-Scene, #805: I snorted my ice tea when I read your comment: “This gal (Casey) is resilient — like some other-century resurrected bacillus.” What an elegant turn of phrase! More to the point, it is true.
Thank you for the guffaw of the week! And may I add, I completely agree with your post. You rock, Mme enScene!
Marcy.
Blink…oh sweet Lord. I just got an array of emails about my last post.. Please remove it.. Thanks so much. Sheri
As of today, trial schedule for Casey Anthony:
Thursday, January 21, 2010 — Trial status hearing, capital murder
Monday, January 25, 2010 — Trial begins, cheque fraud (estimated 5 days)
Monday, June 7, 2010 — Trial begins, civil defamation case
The Grinch visits Casey’s cell and delivers all these gifts
Dee, what do Professor Lyons and Felon Dennis Milstead have in common???!! Both tried to get a bully-tactic upper hand with Ms. Belich, and both times they failed miserably– both were called out as it happened and their efforts and resulting facial expression, seen on camera.
Milstead has little excuse for his behaviour, Ms. Lyon should know better. She might be sorry that she did not include women reporters, along with remarks on jurors, women prosecutors and judges.
Todd, how did Casey sit around the house and not help in the search? She was safe from the real kidnapper in there on her computer, so long as she didn’t go near any windows.
So many levels, this girl and the family story, is transparent.
I think it is very telling that Ms. Lyon was silenced, poor Casey has a sorry a$$ defense team, I bet ole Lyon Heart bolts while the going is easy.
do you think Miss Casey knows about the debacle performance her Defense(less) Team is showing? and if she does why aren’t they FIRED?
Does Miss C think she will win on an appeal? is that the stategy?
“The Grinch visits Casey’s cell and delivers all these gifts”
KLEAT….too funny…and too sad
I think it is hillarious that the Defense hasn’t sputtered one damn word in months about the mysterious Zanax the Nanny…not a word….why? Why in court last week when ole Ms. Lyoness was holding down the fort not even mention her once?????
I thought that was the truth, “that was the last person I saw her with” where did that defense(less) go????
One year ago yesterday, Fox news published a story that sparks the idea of ‘police misconduct’ which would presumably include the FBI personnel, coroner’s office personnel, the coroner, and anyone else present or in a position to direct work at the Suburban Drive crime scene.
The list of mouthpieces for Casey Anthony’s position, is quite a wonderment, beginning with Todd Black, who does not even exist except in the mind of a convicted felon.
Remember the tactics that are still promoted today?
Headline December 18, 2008, before the remains were identified (so why would Casey care if the police were tampering with evidence of another person’s child– she didn’t care enough to call for help or put up a single poster, in 31 days for her own child)
QUOTE:
“CASEY ANTHONY DEFENSE WORRIED POLICE ARE TAMPERING WITH EVIDENCE, ACCUSE COPS OF LYING
Thursday, December 18, 2008
By Catherine Donaldson-Evans
A spokesman for Casey Anthony’s defense lawyer accused police of lying to the press and suggested they could be tampering with evidence at the site where a little child’s bones were found.
Todd Black, a spokesman for Anthony’s lead attorney Jose Baez, complained that investigators won’t let the defense team observe their work at the scene where remains believed to be those of Anthony’s daughter Caylee were discovered.
“Some of their comments are blatant lies,” Black told FOXNews.com. “History has shown that in some cases authorities have been caught tampering with evidence. That is something we hope is not happening. We’re not accusing anyone of anything.”
UNQUOTE
Source: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,469545,00.html
Lol. He was projecting….
B
Anyone looked into the background of one Dominck Casey, including his personal and work history?
Yes. Extensively. He has reason to fight against testifying
B
Dee #879, don’t you think Cindy concocted the defense theory of the JB Park scuffle…er…abduction? Trouble is that scenario didn’t play in as many venues as the Zanax Nanny at Sawgrass.(lol)I’m surmising that Cindy wants to huddle with the Princess in jail w/o the busybody world observing to get a more solid defense story going — as in “You are crazy, sweetheart!”
The thought of Casey torn between the two wild horses, Cindy and Jose, would make me chuckle if it weren’t for thoughts of Caylee.
Marcy #872 …thanks, but I am thinking the resolutely dim, but stubborn Typhoid Mary would have been a better analogy to Casey’s toxic persona!
December 11th, 2009 3:24 pm ET
Is it true that Lozaro refused to take Casey and Caylee in on the last day? Remember, it was said that her boyfriend didn’t want Caylee to come over to his apt. that last night of Caylee’s life.
http://insession.blogs.cnn.com/2009/12/11/death-penalty-considered-in-casey-anthony-case/#comments
I have never heard this before is it indeed true….anyone?
Didn’t Lozaro tell Caysee that he didn’t want to be bothered with Caylee? Caysee wanted to go over to Lozaro’s house that last evening and he said he didn’t feel like having Caylee around. I thought I heard that somewhere. Could this be a reason why Caysee wanted to do away with her daughter?
help me out folks….thanks!
December 12th, 2009 2:43 pm ET
SO we have allready convicted her? Where is the justice. Whatever happen to innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.
Besdies I do not think she did it. I feel she was framed.
December 12th, 2009 2:43 pm ET
SO we have allready convicted her? Where is the justice. Whatever happen to innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.
Besdies I do not think she did it. I feel she was framed.
http://insession.blogs.cnn.com/2009/12/11/death-penalty-considered-in-casey-anthony-case/#comments
can we help this poor gentleman out!
if baez thinks Casey can’t get a fair trial he is wrong there are still folks out there who thinks she is innocent
Considering what the defense, and Casey particularly, have done to Zenaida, they obviously were locusts and moved onto other “prey”, in the likes of Mr.Kronk. Does anyone know if Mr.Kronk can deal with the defense, almost in the same manner as Zenaida Gonzalez did, and nail them all for defamation of character? I would like to see Casey’s and Baez’s paper trail of the real innocence of victims see to it that not one single person involved with the Casey defense team will ever be able to profit from any of this in the future. I would hope if they would be successful in their defamation lawsuits, that they could have a judge slap a lien on any and all present and future monies benefitted from book deals, speaking engagements, talk show appearances, etc. On a side note, I found it very compelling by way of Lillian Glass and her body language analysis of George and Cindy’s recent appearance on the Today Show.
877 dee- now although I am nowhere near an expert on legality purposes, I think Judge Strickland was going through all of these motions with careful attention, or thinking ‘outside the box’ if you will, for the primary reason of he forseeing an attempt by the defense that if anything didn’t go their way, they would be screaming mistrial.
dee
tony lazarro
I have been missing for a while, i was on a 3 month road trip, but am back now and trying to catch up with what has happened in this case. I am so glad for all of you that keep this little girl in your hearts, it has been a long wait for us all with delay after delay and still so many unanswered questions.
I do have a question,that someone might help me with, I thought that I remembered that casey changed the story from Sawgrass apartments to Blanshard park, but didnt this happen after the police informed her Sawgrass apartments had security cameras that they could watch ???? If no one else remembers this then i will go back and read but with being so far behind I am still reading all the newer stuff. I could be wrong but I have always thought that this was why casey came up with a 2nd story
Not only are there folks out there who think she is innocent, there are also folks out there who have no idea who Casey Anthony is. We were in Rochester, NY recently and when I made reference to the case, my sister and brother-in-law had NO idea who or what I was talking about. Believe me – there are people who do not follow any of these missing persons or murder cases. My sister and brother-in-law can talk circles around most people when it comes to fitness and natural health, but they pay NO attention to crime stories. Now, I am interested in crime and justice. There are plenty of people whose interests lie outside major news stories. Who’s kiddin’ who?
# Comment by dee — December 19, 2009 @ 9:30 pm
December 11th, 2009 3:24 pm ET
Is it true that Lozaro refused to take Casey and Caylee in on the last day? Remember, it was said that her boyfriend didn’t want Caylee to come over to his apt. that last night of Caylee’s life.
http://insession.blogs.cnn.com/2009/12/11/death-penalty-considered-in-casey-anthony-case/#comments
I have never heard this before is it indeed true….anyone?
Didn’t Lozaro tell Caysee that he didn’t want to be bothered with Caylee? Caysee wanted to go over to Lozaro’s house that last evening and he said he didn’t feel like having Caylee around. I thought I heard that somewhere. Could this be a reason why Caysee wanted to do away with her daughter?
help me out folks….thanks!
Dee- A lot of people get Tony L and Tony R confused. Tony R is the one that didn’t want Caylee around. He was also a cop.
Psychic Black and Black-Past Comedic Dasey. Thanks, Blink!! Can you share a hint of where to search if online? Ballpark…
welcome back, elmosmommy. Besides security cameras, there would be people around, as Casey sat and waited for ZG to return, then there’s the ‘real’ ZG who threw a real wrench into the works– I don’t think that Casey really wanted them to find her and her NY plated car, BUT not believe MS. Casey. Someone had to tell Casey there had to be a better story, one that would be able to cover why she did not call police (threats/fear) and why she did strange things (told by the kidnapper) and how to cover the eventual baby is not alive realization (threats to do physical harm). Wouldn’t work blaming a real ZG for this until trial, she might just have an alibi and witnesses that she was never a nanny for anyone.
I hadn’t seen this report, or had forgotten about it– Fire Rescue report of November 2007.
Says “21 YOF…. still unrepsponsive, and shaking…no med hx… has been nausea all day and was drinking heavily last night… NP (?)”
Missed the ‘heavy drinking’ part– thought the parents said no drugs/alcohol as the problem. If someone were drinking heavily and took something in combination with the alcohol, could there be a delayed seizure-like reaction?
Keep in mind Caylee was with them when this occurred.
B
Thought Cindy said she didn’t drink heavily, but for her 21st bday which was ‘a permission’ to do it.
“Does anyone know if Mr.Kronk can deal with the defense”
Alvin the Chipmunk could deal with this Defense(less) blind folded with one arm tied behind his back…
Mr. Kronk should not be worried one bit, I would love to see him follow suit right behind ZG, other than Caylee RK and ZG are victims in this serious crime. How does a defense team find peace knowing they are out their destroying innocent peoples lives they should be charged as well, they know that these good folks are innocent how come an individual can not sue a defense team that is involved in the smearing of ones good name, can a person do that? or can they only sue the individual they are representing?
chica I was doing a copy paste thing from another site…
#883 Dee, as I recall–somebody correct me if I am wrong–Tony L. and perhaps his roomates, too, indicated to Casey that it was inappropriate for Caylee to be at his apt. at night with all sorts of party people coming and going with drinking and and probably drug taking.
Seems Lazzaro wasn’t so strict when Casey and he had their bedroom trysts. During the afternoons, while Tony and Casey were in the bedroom, Caylee was left with the roomies or, at least one day, she was left unattended to wander around on Tony’s balcony and to open Tony’s door to whomever.
A girlfriend of Tony’s roomate was very concerned about Caylee’s safety when she saw Caylee left alone this way and decided that Casey was a neglectful mother.
Tony also told Casey that he never wanted to have girl children, only boys when he got married. I’ve always thought that was his way of letting Casey know that he was not taking their relationship to a higher, more serious level.
Justice4all – has commented at both Hinky and Marinade Dave that someone logged into the Zenaida myspace page yesterday. Dave has a post up about it and Val has some comments. Interesting.
OMG ** should have said Val has comments on HER SITE. Coffee where are you?
Lily
Your post made perfect sense to me. Does that mean I need more coffee too?
thanks MsE, I knew about the TL comment about wanting no girls just not about the fact that lil Caylee wasn’t so welcomed, maybe that is why during those 31 days no one seemed to be bothered that lil Caylee wasn’t around, I wonder how those guys feel now, it must be extremely embarrassing for them and heart sickening. I wonder how much guilt these guys feel at this time, I don’t blame them at all just wondering how it would feel to be in the shoes of those that had known Caylee…man this case will never be easy to swallow…