Caylee/Casey Anthony Case: Could The Chloroform Belong To George?
Disclaimer– exclusive original content copyright and property of Internet Network News, LLC and Blinkoncrime.com. Reproduction of this article , ANY OF IT’S Conclusions or CONTENT, in whole or in part without proper attribution and source link is strictly prohibited without prior written permission.
Orlando, FL– I held out for George Anthony as the last hope to restore Caylee Anthony’s dignity in the beginning of this case.
When he visited OCSO on July 24, 2008, he was acting as Caylee’s JoJo, and not “Gelatinous George”.
I thought, ….maybe. I lost that bet. Whatever temporary empowerment Poppa Jo summoned to visit OCSO and retain famed Orlando attorney Mark Nejame outside of the Cindy tractor beam; George shed it like a snake.
When and Why?
I am on record since the Forensics reports indicating elevated levels of chloroform in the trunk air from Casey’s infamous white Pontiac were released: I have never believed chloroform played a part in Caylee’s murder.
I am among the minority.
While watching the Motions Hearing last Friday, I observed an expression of Casey Anthonys that distracted me from concentrating on the balance of the proceeding. It stuck to me like gum on the sole of my Ugg.
Casey glared like a shrew at the exact moment Jeff Ashton used the phrase “chemically restrained” in reference to what may have happened to Caylee to ultimately cause her death. Clearly, it was a thinly veiled reference to chloroform.
I thought, what a wildly inappropriate reaction to be followed up by her version of waterworks.
Maybe-not so much.
What if that hot mess in sea foam gave us a glimpse at her physical reaction to involuntary honesty?
We witnessed the sole reason for the motion to stop videotaping her. She will tell us everything we want to know under the right stimulus.
Chloroform, or the idea of same, enrages subject. The Teflon 100 pounder finally reacts to the metaphoric putrefactive odor in her own case.
Released September 26th, 2008 were the Computer forensics on both the HP desktop used in the Anthony home and the Compaq laptop used by Casey.
At first glance it is clear there is a considerable amount of data missing from the laptop findings. However, in contrast, there is a significant amount of data available for the desktop in both the unallocated and allocated sectors.
After scrutinizing the Internet Histories, Cookies, Fire fox and Safari reports I am comfortable saying that it is fairly easy to tell whether George or Casey was the surfer-in-session. Almost exclusively, Casey used Firefox which deleted her history on the surface and for the most part she left no cookie “crumbs”.
George might as well have posted his e-print on the borrowed mobile billboard.
George is as much a creature of habit on the web as he is on his lawn.
Apparently having not learned his lesson from his earlier web snafu-s, (Editors Note: Nigerian Internet Scam- My Ass.) George made no attempts to delete either his history or his cookies, as none of it was found in the unallocated sectors EXCEPT both sessions of the chloroform searches.
I know, your saying, Blink, WTH? You just told me Casey deletes, George does not, so which is it??
George was home on March 17th, the first search takes place:
In Comparison, from the Desktop following the above search on 3/17/2008:
Fast Forward to the next search on March 21st, 2008. As Time Sheets corroborate, George Anthony worked a 10 hour day, and was not home until after 5PM. This subsequent search is very different; superficial in contrast.
It is as if the query is “What is chloroform, as if I care?” as opposed to the “How do you make chloroform all-business-search on 3/17. In fact, the activity on 3/21 indicates a return to the last history, or point of fact, Casey is interested in what George was interested in when he plopped down on the computer after her, without opening a new window in Explorer, in this author’s opinion.
As you can see, the available (not in unallocated) space reflects none of Casey’s IM and myspace activity for the same day, which preceded the chloroform searches, and there is no further similar activity attributable to her for the 17th. It is however, (count the cookies with me) George’s M.O.
Did he just plop down at the computer after Casey leaves not realizing he needed to open a new browser? The activity of his after that leads me to believe he realized it and did exactly that, without erasing his “trail.”
What has this got to do with the chloroform? Plenty.
Sandwiched between a few of George’s dalliances: a fetish site, specializing in BDSM, www.alt.com (warning, not for Work viewing or in the presence of children, probably best before lunch.)
One of the topics discussed on such a site, is “breathe play” which is a form of autoerotic asphyxiation in which the use of Chloroform during such an event, or other forced gases or “poppers” like ethyl, butyl and ketamin is common. Yes, before you open another window and check the trunk sniffer report from Dr. Voss, you already know these were found in the air from the trunk.
To date, the FBI quantitative results from the sweepings from the liner, as well as the vacuums seized from the Anthony home have not been released. I suspect they will complete the findings here.
I could never figure out why George would seem “Ok” and almost resigned to Casey’s involvement in his beloved granddaughters death and then give us all whiplash with his support of the rotting pizza farce.
I believe Casey was on to him. She was well aware he was being “escorted” all over Orlando behind her Mother’s back. She told Amy Huizenga her Dad was cheating, her parents were divorcing, she was getting the house; because it was TRUE. She would see to it personally now that George was working 3–11 and making it nearly impossible to feign employment with a toddler on the verge of intelligible conversation, in tow. He began checking Caylee’s piggy bank, her account, asking Caylee about names Casey was using as associates in her *cough* work.
An obstacle indeed for a damsel in a blossoming romance with live baggage. Emphasis on the root word Damn.
It was divide and conquer time for Casey when Cindy finally seeks counseling advice on her situation. The only reason Casey did not pull the trigger on her faux patricide is because she met TonE Lazzaro. She waffled upon the uncertainty of his permanence. For a while, anyway.
In a scenario that allowed me to momentarily feel sorry for Cindy, I knew I needed to kevlar myself for any outcome. Given the circumstances of her own issues, it was not difficult.
So we find ourselves in the conundrum– How does the potential for George owning the chloroform shape up?
Let’s face it. If the sweepings and the cleaning gadgetry seized from the Anthony’s contain similar chemical/Bio to the trunk liner this is all over.
If it does not, the chloroform, ownership and acquisition of same, is paramount to this case. Speaking on the condition of anonymity, I have interviewed a FEMA Hazmat Biotech specialist and a Chemist PhD Fellow on staff at Johnson & Johnson. Both told me the amount of chloroform found in that trunk in conjunction with the etymology live cycle does not jive.
In other words, if we believe the chloroform was in the trunk as the murder weapon, or even dumped in it as a frame job prior to it’s abandonment on June 27, 2008, by their calculations, the degrading chloroform would act as an insecticide of sorts. At the very least, would not register so high in the air sample but very high in the composition found in the liner. Once chloroform is vaporized, In their opinion, a better explanation would be that chloroform was dumped in the trunk closer to when the car was picked up, or July 15. On July 16th it was impounded and placed in a climatic controlled environment. A stabilizer, if you will. Chloroform is also known to burn at very high temperatures. Given the levels, it is possible in the Flordia heat the amount of chloroform in that trunk might have combusted during the June 27th-July 15th timeframe.
George was emphatic about smelling decomposition in that car. He took the battery out and placed the deathmobile in the garage. Was he concerned it was a fire hazard now as well?
From a defense perspective, George is the perfect patsy. He Leaves gates open, irresponsible with the pool ladder, will lie about the last time he saw his daughter and granddaughter– twice.
Let me be clear. I do not think George Anthony would ever harm a hair on Caylee Marie’s blessed head. I also think he put himself in a position to defend Casey to save his own secrets, brought to his attention ex post facto.
Escorting by its latin name, P-R-O-S-T-I-T-U-T-I-O-N, is illegal in Florida.
There is no doubt in my mind Mr. Anthony was schooled on what might be coming his way if he did not join the formation, pronto.
If there still is in yours, I have provided thumbnails for your perusal and nausea. Be sure and review the pattern of site stat checking, escort site, individual “prospects”, financial account transaction, and yes, in some cases, calendar booking and hotel reservations *trends*.
There’s more. I just did not have the stomach for it.
No wonder the Nigerian Pyramid or deposit scam sounded good to him. Consider the alternative conversation.
Images courtesy of Klaasend
Raw Excell reports courtesy of JWG
Related Posts
Related Posts:
608 Comments
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
“HAHAHA Blink is A Joke — December 26, 2009 @ 5:39 pm
What a wild imagination you have there Blink-er-roo! No way do i think George was involved, but Kudos to you, you have the nut jobs following you and wowing you! Sometimes you are on the ball and I do read your site but this time, I think your imagination has worked over time. Go get some sleep or go over to some of the intelligent posts on other sites where facts are facts. Basketcase you are with this article. LOL”
see these are the idiots that venture over from sites that allow bashing and name calling, I dont think GEO killed Caylee I will always believe is was Casey and Casey alone, but the A’s are IMO involved in some kind of ridiculous attempt at a cover up, to protect mom of the year!
so so funny, I have been here for over a year now and will always stand by my comment that this place is the real deal. BIAJ is un-informed, he/she is venturing here a day late, I suggest he/she checks out all the postings on this site from day one and then post his/hers nonsense.
sadly Blink I think all the crazy’s will visit here after the bashing from Horns on his head, their posts make me laugh, they dont enrage me because I know they are “Eyes Wide Shut”.
I wouldn’t doubt you have received some serious vulgar and unwarrented and unwanted post, but good for you Blink that you allow some of these through, this only supports the fact that Casey can receive a fair trial and she does have some supporters out there, so let Baez and company chew on that….
I suspected all along that Cindy, not George, had cleaned out the car with choloform when she washed her pants etc. If George did it I really pray to god they both get whacked on charges. This family is sickening, the whole world would be better off if they all could get the DP. Hey they’re breathing our air. What a package, Caylee you are so much better off in heaven little darling.
God bless Caylee.
I hope everyone had a great Christmas! We had about 20″ of snow and been feeling antsy and stuck.
I have been reading here for awhile and I really enjoy this site! I find out alot of information that I don’t find anywhere else. Plus, the people that share their insights and theories makes me come back to this site every day to read. It has made me look at this horrible situation in a new way and I am thankful for feeling even a little part of this site. Great article and keep them coming! thank you Blink
#292 Ragdoll…….. that was me! I thought it was a real valid question.
Blink, thanks for all your efforts in all the cases you involve yourself in. I not only respect your efforts, but also respect the manner in which you conduct yourself with dignity while dealing with those who do not appreciate your efforts.
I think Anne hit the nail on the head in her description of why Richard Hornsby is yet again attempting to draw attention to himself in hopes it will somehow pay off for him.
Just a quick review of his “successes” he advertises on his site.
2001 – 2003 ASST PUBLIC DEFENDER OFFICE (so cases handed to him)
15 “wins” (one defendant coincidentally named Baez)
2003 – 2004 ASSOCIATE AT WOOLFOLK & JORDAN
2003 – NO “win” cases in 12 months
2004 – 6 “win” cases in 12 months
2005 – 2009 OPENS PRIVATE PRACTICE
2005 – 7 “win” cases in 12 months
2006 – 13 “win” cases in 12 months (MAJORITY DUI)
2007 – 7 “win” cases in 12 months
2008 – 4 “win” cases in 12 months
2009 – 3 “win” cases in 12 months
Guess that is why he is buying up domains (over 150 to date) in order to be at the top of Google searches?
http://74.125.93.132/search?q=cache:6LSNnqPh9jMJ:www.thedomains.com/2009/09/26/why-do-lawyers-spend-thousands-a-month-renting-billboards-dont-spend-a-dime-for-a-good-domain/+richard+hornsby+attorney+orlando&cd=74&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
His recent attacks on others is simply an attempt to try to creatively drum up attention (re: possible business) for a fledging law practice. His “wins” seem to have been on a drastic decline in recent years, so keep up the hard work and remember, jealously has been the downfall of many who think they are greater and bigger than they are.
In my career, I learned something that has both never left me, and never been proven wrong to me:
..”Your hired by the people above you, and fired by the people below you..”
B
Blink, thank you for your post on Topix. I hope this puts to rest the resounding stupidity of a couple of the posters there.
This is my post, do not waste your time with a site that allows folks to surf through proxy and post under multiple hats, etc.. Anyway, it was in response to allegations I am a self-proclaimed psychic and I think evidence planter.
Enough already. Know what I think? I think we are feeling the ripple of desperate. Ride the wave to justice for me and this too shall pass.
**********
Good Evening All-
I just wanted to share a vision I just had.
I had not realized until today that I was a psychic, but now that I have been “outed”, it makes perfect sense.
Wign/HoHoHo/Monoxide/Loon-
Your foxyproxy is wearing you thin.
Manic episodes exceeding 4 hours may need a physician. O wait, I think I might have that confused. That might be what is coming through because of your “circulation issues”.
Hold on, let me focus, I am new at this.
Ok, I am getting a young man, in his basement, one hand on his mouse, the other on his joystick.
He is crying. He is saying “They like me, they really like me..” They answered my comment, they must now love me.. It’s forever…
Not sure what that means.
Trying again.. (Blink rubs beads)
I see a man with a badge in front of a judge.
He is tall with kind eyes.
I see the man in the black robe signing something.
Now, I see the guy in the basement crying again. He is not in the basement now, though.
He is saying,..” but I did not really mean it…”
I am a novice, but I think it might be someone in OCSO checking out a tip made on a forum where some imbecile, looking to interject themselves, made an allegation they are already sorry for.
#297
Karen wrote:
# Comment by karen — December 26, 2009 @ 6:14 pm
Its a really far reach to go from S&M to pedofilia. As in wouldnt want George around my grandchildren. Sheesh!
What are you talking about??
Blinks Response:
There is no link from George to pedo, in fact, if you read here, you would know I am adamant against such an allegation.
B
Blink, I think this might be about something a posted the other day… I was referring to the defense putting George up for the fall guy, by stating that I wouldn’t put it past them to insinuate George’s “weird sex sites” could lead a juror to question pedophilia perhaps being enough to sway some jurors into reasonable doubt.
I never meant to imply you, the state, or I, for that matter believed this to be true.
I hope that clears this up, as I know that Caylee loved her JoJo very much as she loved her Grandma, Mom and Uncle too. I would never defame her memory by promoting such a sick twisted allegation about her grandpa. Never.
Good Point and in context, I agree with you, thanks for posting this.
B
#275 Comment by Kleat — December 26, 2009 @ 2:54 pm
***********************
Great post & I agree points well taken. Thanks Kleat & I always have loved reading your exchanges with Blink & look forward to more about this case.
Blink, I’m going to read past the first line of your post about being a psychic, well this is confusing because what the heck does a psychic need with a proxy server? Save the bucks, use your psychic abilities instead, hone your skills at the same time.
(snark if no one got it… 
lol
B
Mariann,
Looks like you and I think an awful lot alike.
I think you did ask the very same question I asked in Post #12.
Cindy puts herself in such quanderies when she insists on lying.
In the movie “The Client” Tommy Lee Jones says, “Lying lips are a abomination unto the Lord.” (Prov. 21:28) Go go Tommy!
Blink, who personally attacks someone for their age or appearance? We know one person who does that, and unless it’s a voluntary cause of one’s appearance, like hair dye or make-up or other embellishments, that would make it prejudice. It could also be a tactic of a bully, pure and simple.
I wonder if Ms.Lyon’s lecture was the tip of the iceberg, about defense lawyer’s ‘secrets of the trade’.
Ragdoll,
As for Cindy’s lying on the chlorophyll: Blink says she was schooled by someone before the states interview on those search points. My question has been: Did she say it exactly the way they wanted her to say it? (If so, now she looks like a fool). Or did she screw up and let her own determination interpose, and she said what SHE wanted.
What is your opinion?
Dear Blink,
I have never posted here before. Yes, everyone says that on their first live date here. I am just a person who has watched your posts from when I got my new laptop and my son in law took a call from you during Sunday dinner.
I am an old lady who has no time for this internet hating nonsense. I say that like I know what that is, but I do not. I come on here to read about what is important to my family and maybe some movie star gossip because my friend Mrs. Gunnison always knows more than I do about that and it is annoying at club. Like that lipstick she wears.
Anyway. My son in law took your call in my husbands study on speaker phone so I heard your voice. Well, we all really did and my daughter cracked up when you told him he had a hole in the dike.
I am probably not supposed to say what I have already, but nobody knows what tolls this case has has on people’s families and households like it is some kind of game. It is not.
Anyway, I know you know what you are doing because I heard it with my own ears and my daughter laughed when you bossed (redacted) around and told him about some things that did not add up. They did not, and you were right. I was hooked since then, and I get angry when people are bullied.
I do not know if it matters to you, but if you quit what you do because of mean miscreants, you would let this old lady down.
Please don’t.
Very truly Yours,
Mrs. (redacted by B)
I will be honest. I checked your IP to make sure this was you. You will have no idea what that means.
Please know that this is the warmest feeling I could have when I needed it most.
Please do not post your name anywhere. I changed it a bit because if you don’t your daughter is going to give you the “what for”.
I apologize for interrupting your dinner my good lady.
Blessings.
B
De nada, Blink.
I am just now learning with this case, Morgan’s case and now, with Hornsby’s blog, that one has to be careful with what they post. The written word is so often misinterpreted and more often than not, taken out of context. Sometimes to the detriment of all.
Thanks for putting it all out there Blink, in the hopes that it will help at least one victim or their family.
I’ve always wondered – Did the Anthonys change the locks on their doors after Casey told them that the nanny had a set of keys and had been to the house a few times on her own?
Adam
what’s with you?
I just noticed a different poster was insulted by you what’s up
do you feel good correcting others to satisy your ego
up until now I hadn’t seen this here.
I thought it was just me! But I see i’m not the only one that you target. You need to take manners 101 proper ways to adresses people, sorry. Blink but I’m not very patient when it comes to arrogant idiots
Adam
just noticed you insulted someone else for something they posted which you say is an cient news!
Where are your manners?
I am glad to read I’m not your only target! Which leads me to believe that you have an over inlated ego like Hornsby.
Were a friendly bunch here! Not taken to kindly to insults
I may be repremmended by blink! But try as I may
I have to defend my fellow posters! Were not all professionals our grammer not the best!
But one thing you can count on! We stick together!
Our manners are inpecible. Perhaps you can learn from us if u weren’t to busy knit pickin us!
Why we just plain folk!
We come here to sit a spell! To pour our hartz out! We focus on seekin justuz fur caylee
we ain’t to kin on properrrr spelin n grahmer!
We juz sez what Cuna frum duh hart! One comun goall iz justuz 4 a Lil hurl kilt bi hue mumm
jwurk wiz iz not agenzt uS
that said
let’s not loose our focus here
not trying to make others look bad to make ourselves look good
sorry blink
as Hornsby annoys you with his tacky self so does Adam annoy me and others
now back to the real cause justice for caylee
the end
Chica-
What did I miss? I saw him say something about your spelling, but as you are “international” I never thought is an issue. I admit it does crack me up a tad that your English gets worse when your angry, lol.
We have that in common. I say words that would embarass my Mother, and have my Daddy wishing I was more like her.
Let’s move on my friend.
B
Only last month, ‘joint defense’ related lawyer Diana Tennis, decides to endorse Mr. H. on AVVO.
(http://www.avvo.com/attorneys/32803-fl-richard-hornsby-1293369/endorsements.html)
Could it be that this so recent peer endorsement anticipates Mr. H.’s possible association with the so-called ‘joint defense’ of Casey Anthony and is he working on the public perception by his attacks of late before that might take place officially? Ms. Tennis began on Fox and in MSM shows as ‘expert’ commentator on the Casey Anthony case, long since directly associated with the defense in her role as lawyer for PI Dom Casey. Seems lawyer’s in the media first, are the ones to board the stagecoach for Tombstone.
“Peer Endorsements
Endorsement from lawyer: Diana Tennis , Orlando (FL), About 1 month ago
Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community
Endorsement: I remember a time when I would have considered Richard a “younger” lawyer, but he has certainly proven himself in this town as aggressive, experienced, and talented. I think prosecutors and judges alike know that Richard does not roll over and knows what he is talking about. I am sure his clients know they are well represented and getting value for their money. Don’t let the baby face fool you. ”
Let me say that Mr. Casey’s issues are bubbling to the surface as you astute readers fully realize, is the reason for the shotgun stance. Blitz time.
B
Just, wanted to add, that once a comment or a blog is “out there” it can not be taken back, even with an apology sometimes the damage is too great. I really hope that everyone takes this latest fiasco and learns from it,take a moment to reread what you have written. Make sure its something that you can stand behind, always.
Emotions are wonderful, a great writer is only great if they can stir some of themselves into what they have written. Although, there is a responsibility as such to not write something in a knee jerk fashion just to get your point across and not to write in an angry moment what under normal circumstances you wouldn’t dream of “letting out there.” Thanks for always standing behind your work and your team Blink. Much respect.
TY mom3
Sage advice.
B
“Comment by Nauseated — December 26, 2009 @ 11:09 pm
I’ve always wondered – Did the Anthonys change the locks on their doors after Casey told them that the nanny had a set of keys and had been to the house a few times on her own?”
Nauseated, I believe both Cindy and George in their depositions stated that “no” they didn’t change any of the locks and didn’t change any of the key pads. (If I remember correctly.)
Odd, statement isn’t it. If I was told that the Nanny kidnapped my grandaugter AND had keys to the house, the first thing I would do is change EVERYTHING!
It’s sooooooo interesting that Hornsby sems to be selective about what he chooses to publish of the posts placed on his site …anyhow that aside going back to George I return to a subject that I have have posted earlier on this site which at the time did not garner much interest but to me seems even more relevant now – when Casey left the car at the Amscot and it was towed the guy at the tow place was suprised when George mentioned the Amscot as being where it was towed from before the tow guy even mentioned it to him PLUS it was not mentioned on the paperwork sent to the Anthonys. How did he know it was at the Amscot?????? It ties in with Casey saying to Tony that her Dad would take care of it….so again how did George KNOW that it was at the Amscot?????????????
Actually it is very relevant. All I am willing to publish at the moment.
B
What is the difference between “use immunity” and “criminal immunity”?
Did I understand right, that Lee Anthony asked for criminal immunity?
Now after reading Lee’s depo….I can not see where immunity was any benefit to Lee?
Did I miss something???? (I probably did.)
Chica,
You vented your spleen about me yesterday. Why are you carrying on again today? Gracious for one post you have this snit? I didn’t see anyone else complaining about me unless I missed it.
Sorry already, chill,
Peace
Ragdoll
I looked back also for the original post regarding the neck breaking search question but couldn’t find it. I don’t know anymore than you about this but on another board waaay back when someone offered a plausible reason, it may or may not be right.
He said that there is a local truck club that is called Neck Breakers, the big 4 wheel drive tricked out tucks or in the urban dictionary neck breaking is what happens when a good looking chick (or guy) walks past…everybody’s breaking necks to look or there is a band called the Neck Breakers or the Swinging Neck Breakers.
I guess the key is WHO was looking it up but maybe one of these explanations are the reason or in that family it’s anybody’s guess.
As for the shovel searches, my gut tells me the anal GA needed to find the proper shovel for some meticulous yard chore?????
Just thought I’d throw these out until we hear more.
Anybody know why Richard Hornsby identifys himself as a “lay person” when commenting on the Casey Antony case on tv?
http://74.125.93.132/search?q=cache:6LSNnqPh9jMJ:www.thedomains.com/2009/09/26/why-do-lawyers-spend-thousands-a-month-renting-billboards-dont-spend-a-dime-for-a-good-domain/+richard+hornsby+attorney+orlando&cd=74&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us
Yes I do.
So it would not be construed with legal advice. As if.
B
Blink
Thanks for deleting all those posts!I read here and unless there is a link to somewhere else I stay here.A couple of times I have read comments on other blogs and it gave me a headache.And although you and I agree on almost nothing about this case,its ok,our hearts are in it for one person and that is for caylee Whichever way this story ends, it will always be for caylee!
Thank you for your “house” and the way you keep it! Its very much appreciated
Deleting what posts?
B
Sorry linguists, make that spelling “identifies”.
Re #320 – thank you for that validation – *puts head down and continues along the track she has been heartily persuing*
No need for the head down, lol.
I suspect George knew on 7/8, the only other day George speaks to Casey on the cell besides 6/16 3:04 PM.
That said, I do not believe he ever knew Caylee was missing, and as we now know deceased. I also do not believe he had access to the car while on the Johnson’s lot. I was there last year personally and checked it out.
Random text to WW on 7/10… Getting a rental
B
Thanks for the link, PamK. Very interesting post there coming from a lawyer who rants against ‘marketing expert lawyers’ such as John Morgan, rants against Bill Schaeffer’s first blog enough to shut him down, and rails on Ms. Blink for being in some sort of ‘marketing’ angle and that’s all her work for the missing amounts to. Read below, and decide if the person making those accusations, is not himself, well versed in marketing via the internet, and what use he himself has for one hundred YouTube videos on his own YouTube site along (88 percent of which are Casey Anthony case).
Quote the lawyer RH’s post about his rather extensive ‘marketing’, dated September 2009:
“…And I leave you with this, I am an Orlando criminal lawyer and I come up number 1 in Google for Orlando Criminal Lawyer in both Local and organic searches. BUT my domain is http://www.richardhornsby.com. Why is that, good SEO that is why. Although I own over 150 Orlando or Florida criminal lawyer related domains; I only use my name, because I am marketing myself long term, not some short term search phrase.
As for the value of your generic search names, while I agree that they allow someone to get noticed by Google faster, they are only as valuable long term as they content they possess.
And that brings me back to your “frustration” with no one seeing value in your names – that is because they do not have long term value, rather they have defensive marketing value. Meaning, I buy domain names related to my field to make it that much harder for people to get up near me in searches. So while I will not hesitate to pay $10, $50 or even a few grand to buy keyword domain names just to keep others from getting them, $10K is ridiculous. What if I got http://www.orlando-bankruptcy-lawyers.com, or http://www.orlando-bankruptcy-lawyer.com, or http://www.orlandobankruptcylaw.com, etc. You dont build a brand around those, you build search campaigns. And the problem is that any attorney who cold afford your asking prices is building their name (especially geo-specific domains).
An for full disclosure to those who read this, I offered $3,500 max for orlandodivorceattorney.com because I could (1) afford it and (2) was looking to keep others from utilizing its SEO value. But the law of diminishing returns kicks in after that, because I know a proper SEO campaign would allow me to consistently ranke above any attorney with that domain (although they would have an advantage over others). But again, most lawyers will not pay $10K for the domain because few divorces pay that much and if they did, they hired you because of reputation, not your domain.
p.s. Full disclosure, I am a praticing criminal lawyer, but I know more than 75% of SEO experts because I have been builidng websites since 1996. So if I was not in law I would be doing what you all do. Toodles…”
unquote
Pair this with a photo from his own Avvo information– open the last one there, bottom right. It’s a poster, marketing patriotism, the flag and all that, with a glossy portrait in grand style complete with halo-like glow surrounding his dominantly placed figure.
http://www.avvo.com/attorneys/32803-fl-richard-hornsby-1293369/aboutme.html
Blink, I think Midwest mom #325 was referring to the 96 comments you mentioned you deleted earlier.
I wanted to mention that Mr. H. did post a comment today 12/26@3:50p.m., which shows up in his older comments. Here is a partial of the post. “I will be moving back to my original purpose, which was to comment on the REAL issues involved in the Casey Anthony saga.”
I was pleased to see this and wanted to pass this on.
My answer to your question Blink # 325 (even tho it isn’t my post):
Blink #266 above, your response to Innocent Bystander, you say you deleted about 100 posts. I took that to mean that you moderated (deleted) posts that were primarily a response to RH blog, so that we could move on from there. Maybe not what you meant?
Partially. They contained very “passionate” views about the issue that were negatively charged (mildly put). I will never have comments like that on here. That is not what we are here for. A few were from Attorneys offering pro bono representation, lol.
B
Simon B. was surprised at Georges knowledge of the car being towed from Amscot, when he didn’t think that was information posted on the notice they had sent out. This always bothered me and made me feel George had prior knowledge. I do remember reading somewhere in the documents that George said he had called the tow yard first, and that is how he found out. I thought okay, that makes sense and I haven’t had alot of thought about it since, until kiwi_bird #320 brought it up again. Did anyone else read this? perhaps it was in an interview versus document. If this is not true, this does open up a very big can of worms for George or I should say more cans. According to your answer to kiwi_bird, Blink, you said it was very relevant that George knew this information. So leaves me thinking, he had prior knowledge. They must have checked it out and his answers didn’t jive.
I just wanted to say, I’m really sorry that someone tried to take down your good reputation. Things like this can do unrepairable damage. It was so unfair and so uncalled for and I’m really sorry this happened to you. You didn’t deserve any of this. It’s scary that an individual can be that vicious. I thought a lesson had been learned the first time, but apparently it hadn’t. How many more will this happen to? I think further attention needs to be brought to this matter, before others continue to be harmed. I say no mas.
I am of the opinion, and I was once guilty of this myself, that there are very few people that post on the web that understand the laws regarding same.
Many (none here) think the web is their personal toilet they are free to use at will, just like they could take a dump alfresco wherever they like, with the first ammendment acting like the loo door. Not so.
I have read some nitwit say “you can post anything you want, just make sure it is true..” Again, Not so.
I have seen a similar nitwit encouraging others to dig up dirt, call family members, current and or former, with the sole purpose of invading privacy and hoping to again, exact some sort of distress. There are some baffoons that think that gives them license to do so without reprisal. Not so. Specifically if an individual calls to action such nonsense, they are equally as liable for any consequences of same.
If the intent is to harass, annoy, or inflict distress, among other classifications, someone has just opened themselves up to citation, civil litigation, and possibly criminal action, based on the jurisdictional statutes and limitations of either party. Add in there that someone makes patently false accusations about your character, and it is now attached to your name professionally, which could now be effing with someone’s livelihood, major no no.
You post it, you own it, in your own name or anonymous, period.
Before I launched this site, I spoke to a mentor of mine, who is someone very close to this case.
I said, sometimes being precariously perched on the precipice is scary and more than I can stand.
His response:
Yes, but isn’t the view from there the reward? Stay your course. If someone tries to knock you off, get out of their way and let them fall into the abyss they created for themselves. You wanna be stuck down there with them?
That said, I would be lying if I did not wish this case was at conclusion so I could set a few things straight.
If I did not truly believe I, along with all of you, could make an impact in the successful prosecution of this case, as well as others I cover, I would never do this work.
B
Are you for real ? Is it not evident to YOU that anyone (with an ounce of intelligence)reading the blog comments can see YOU replying to YOU ? I used to not like you, but now I actually feel sorry for you.
Well I do talk to myself constantly, although I always thought that was part of my charm.
You are kidding right? Everyone on here is smarter than me, what would be the point?
I try to never form opinions about people I have never met, but hey, that’s just me.
Happy New Year !!
B
O and this is Blink responding to you, or is it??
MMMUUUUUUAAAAAA
If Casey was working as an escort, wouldn’t some of her “clients” have come forward (unless they already have….) and the same for George’s dalliances, if there were any, someone would have fessed up already. I do remember a picture of KC, dressed provocatively (more than usual…ahem) sucking on a lollipop and that this was supposedly a pic on an escort site, like her profile pic. does anyone remember this?
Sorry blink, response to #266.
- guess the corect term is comments not post.
Deleting comments. Almost 100 to be exact”
I would want to read all those comments.
Regarding George:IIRC didn’t you have a theory that he may have been at the tow yard twice? Or am I confusing that with something else?
He was there twice. Once in the morning and returned in the afternoon with Cindy. He could have called the Amscot after originally speaking to Nicole Lett, but I believe since Simon Birch noted it specifically, there must be a practice in place that they do not typically disclose that.
B
Thank you Randie re: post #319 -
So may I deduce from this tidbit of information that either the Anthonys –
1) knew from the start the nanny story was entirely fiction.
2) are just plain stupid.
3) are clueless and stupid.
4) or all of the above.
“I try to never form opinions about people I have never met, but hey, that’s just me.
Happy New Year !!
B”
Blink, I think this says it all about Mr. Hornsby.
A man never discloses his own character so clearly as when he describes another’s. (John Paul Richter Late 1700′s)
First Bill S. Then you and soon Baez. I don’t think I can improve on what JP Richter said so long long ago.
I feel compelled to point out how amusing it is to see someone talk about their “reliable source” when said source is anything but. It’s always good to know the honesty quotient of the folks you are getting information from. (Definitely backing the wrong horse on this one, Dick.)
And it’s not as if someone needed the additional help in looking foolish, ya know?
Since I found blinkoncrime.com, after becoming a member of Scared Monkeys, I read here all the time. I’ve never posted anything here before because everyone is always WAY ahead of me and is far more knowledgeable about this case than I am. At first I only followed the case on Nancy Grace but didn’t find that I was getting all the information I wanted so sought out internet sources. I’ve mucked through a lot of “garbage” and found only 3 sites that I visit now for all information related to this case. Scared Monkeys, The Hinky Meter, and of course blinkoncrime!!
Perhaps this was covered prior to my good fortune of finding blinkoncrime. If so, would someone kindly point me to a link. If not, perhaps Blink or one of the other knowledgeable posters here could throw me a bone.
My question relates to Will Waters. I don’t think he’s involved in Caylee’s murder whatsoever! However, there are some things that kind of boggle my brain. When I read his LE transcript dated July 30, 2008 he tells us that he first met Casey on July 4th at his party. He was smitten by her and they spend the next day, the 5th together. He has other correspondance with her via text messages, phone conversations and My Space babblings.
In his LE interview, the detective asks him “So really, have you ever laid eyes on her other than the 4th & 5th? You hang out for a day together? It seems to me there’s something in your memory there.”
Will Waters replies “I’m just trying to remember.. uh”
Trying to remember what? He just visited her in jail on 07/29/2008, less than 24 hours before this interview. Has their jailhouse visit ever been released? What did they discuss? I find it hard to believe that he didn’t just pop right off with the fact that he just saw her the day before.
She text messaged Will Waters on I believe 07/10/2008 indicating that she may be getting a rental car. How? Her ID was in the towed car from all accounts I have read. She doesn’t have a major credit card from what I could confirm. Was George going to arrange for this rental car? Is it another one of her lies?
Lastly, in the LE interview the detective reads a crimeline tip to Will Waters “Ryan Huffman, suspect stated Will Waters, Casey’s supposed boyfriend, mentioned in casual conversation that Casey had been in an accident and brought her car in for repair. Afterwards, unknown mechanic, unknown garage, stated the car smelled like a dead body. No further details. Ring a bell?”
From what I could decipher, Will’s reaction to this statement was extreme uneasiness. Did Casey share some incriminating information with Will Waters that we don’t know about? Was it just simply fear of incrimination?
Something just isn’t adding up here. Does anyone have any clues? TIA
Your missing something, but I am remote and hopefully someone will link you what I recall from memory.
WW called OCSO after hearing that comment and was concerned it was being sad about him, iirc.
B
Blink~
I don’t know if you believe in God. But I do. And this is the BEST possible advise I could give you. I’ve been in a similiar situation before and have met the devil- who entered and took over a person’s being. This person was a principal at a Catholic school believe it or not. I worked for the Lord. I was filled with His Spirit. I spoke for those too weak to speak for themselves. I faced the devil head to head and after alot of prayer- I stood strong and did not waiver. I was given strength I never knew I had. I had a clear head and didn’t back down. Guess what? I prevailed. It was not pretty and I don’t wish it upon anyone but please know, the devil only attacks those who are strong and stand for something. You stand for the truth. You stand for Caylee. All this other stuff is just dust kicked up in your eyes trying to put you down or mislead you or others. It’s the work of the devil. Please continue to stand strong. You are our spokesperson- the strong one for many of us who are weak. We stand by you and our thoughts and prayers are with you. Now go kick the shit out of that devil WOMEN!
Regarding Post #320 and George knowing about the car being at Amscot.
In Nicole Lett’s interview (she’s the girl who worked at Johnson’s Tow Yard), she said George first came to the tow yard to ask about the car –
“He, well he pretty much gave me the, the type of vehicle it was and asked where we found the vehicle at. And we told him where we found it..” ~~snipped.
Page 3
http://www.cfnews13.com/uploadedFiles/Lett%20%20Nicole0824.pdf
George didn’t have the title or the money to get the car out, so he had to leave and come back. It was during his second time there that he mentioned the car being at Amscot to Simon Burch.
Hope this helps!
Happy Birthday Chica!
Gosh Blink what happened here in this blog it has turned into a total bitch fest, are we serving beer at this fest cause I am getting thirsty reading all the hate…can we just pass around some festive Glühwein and get on with the task at hand.
Bless the sunshine law.These other cases can be so depressing,and then i come back to this case and its refreshing and hopeful cuz i can actually make progress in my attempt to understand what happened,only because of the release of verified info,without this info,frustration.to back this opinion up: arent depression sufferers encouraged to get some sunshine,doesnt foggy rainy Seattle have the highest depression rates? the sunshine law works. imo
I try to never form opinions about people I have never met, but hey, that’s just me.
Happy New Year !!
B
Blink, if the statement above were true, this site simply would not exist. I mean, aren’t you forming opinions about people you never met on a regular basis in order to come up with your theories ? Happy and prosperous New Year to you, as well.
I get it. You don’t like me or the site, wait I mean I think at last comment you were feeling sorry for me.
Their is a difference between writing on people’s behavior and actions as they relate to news. I do not believe anyone can fully form an opinion on someone until and if they actually meet. I don’t find that to be a difficult concept to identify with.
B
Blink, could be that Mamamook was referring to your message from Red, which was posted by you to share. (Mamamook, it’s not a deception thing, we all know who Red is, we’ve read Red
Thanks for sharing your precipice story Blink. I’m going to put this one in pocket, if you don’t mind, so I can pull it out to re-read when needed.
Hi Blink I dont post much but wanted to comment on your reply to
Mamamook..I read here a lot and am always amazed how your mind works I’ll be 74 in a few weeks and it’s awesome to see how you can unravel these mysterys.. better than reading a mystery novel.lol.. Keep up the good work and praises from the older generation., We have your back…. God Bless you….
Thank you Ms. Alice.
Happy Early Birthday.
B
kyrasmommy, you asked wouldn’t any theoretical customers of a theoretical escort Casey come forward. I’m scratching my head trying to imagine a scenario under which a john would come forward. I just don’t think there’s anything in it for them to do so. Kind of like saying if Casey were a drug dealer, wouldn’t her customers come forward?
So, George has a sex addiction in addition to a gambling addiction. Cindy is willing to throw him under the bus for revenge- not because she really wants to save Casey. Therefore, they put on the loving couple act by getting re-baptized and tattooed and canoodling on boats. George should have had a giant lollipop tattooed on his head – as in world’s biggest sucker!
Not all those sites are for escorts – looks like Georgie wanted a relationship,too. Chemistry.com is a dating site.I wonder if he used the line “my wife doesn’t understand me”. Any chance he may have been pushing Cindy into swinging? AdultFriendFinder has a large swingers crowd. Maybe that’s how they found Dominic – lol. Somehow I don’t see George having the guts to use chloroform for sex. I don’t see him having the guts to cheat with a live woman behind Cindy’s back either.He’s a terrible liar. I can see him getting into a lot of Internet porn as a fantasy escape or using chatrooms for IM based sexual conversations or using a webcam in private to “cheat”.
So, was Ricardo’s chloroform joke a set up to mock George?
What’s the difference between Tiger Woods and Santa Claus? Santa stops at three Ho’s.
Substitute George for Tiger and you have the same scenario.;)