Caylee/Casey Anthony Case: Could The Chloroform Belong To George?
Disclaimer– exclusive original content copyright and property of Internet Network News, LLC and Blinkoncrime.com. Reproduction of this article , ANY OF IT’S Conclusions or CONTENT, in whole or in part without proper attribution and source link is strictly prohibited without prior written permission.
Orlando, FL– I held out for George Anthony as the last hope to restore Caylee Anthony’s dignity in the beginning of this case.
When he visited OCSO on July 24, 2008, he was acting as Caylee’s JoJo, and not “Gelatinous George”.
I thought, ….maybe. I lost that bet. Whatever temporary empowerment Poppa Jo summoned to visit OCSO and retain famed Orlando attorney Mark Nejame outside of the Cindy tractor beam; George shed it like a snake.
When and Why?
I am on record since the Forensics reports indicating elevated levels of chloroform in the trunk air from Casey’s infamous white Pontiac were released: I have never believed chloroform played a part in Caylee’s murder.
I am among the minority.
While watching the Motions Hearing last Friday, I observed an expression of Casey Anthonys that distracted me from concentrating on the balance of the proceeding. It stuck to me like gum on the sole of my Ugg.
Casey glared like a shrew at the exact moment Jeff Ashton used the phrase “chemically restrained” in reference to what may have happened to Caylee to ultimately cause her death. Clearly, it was a thinly veiled reference to chloroform.
I thought, what a wildly inappropriate reaction to be followed up by her version of waterworks.
Maybe-not so much.
What if that hot mess in sea foam gave us a glimpse at her physical reaction to involuntary honesty?
We witnessed the sole reason for the motion to stop videotaping her. She will tell us everything we want to know under the right stimulus.
Chloroform, or the idea of same, enrages subject. The Teflon 100 pounder finally reacts to the metaphoric putrefactive odor in her own case.
Released September 26th, 2008 were the Computer forensics on both the HP desktop used in the Anthony home and the Compaq laptop used by Casey.
At first glance it is clear there is a considerable amount of data missing from the laptop findings. However, in contrast, there is a significant amount of data available for the desktop in both the unallocated and allocated sectors.
After scrutinizing the Internet Histories, Cookies, Fire fox and Safari reports I am comfortable saying that it is fairly easy to tell whether George or Casey was the surfer-in-session. Almost exclusively, Casey used Firefox which deleted her history on the surface and for the most part she left no cookie “crumbs”.
George might as well have posted his e-print on the borrowed mobile billboard.
George is as much a creature of habit on the web as he is on his lawn.
Apparently having not learned his lesson from his earlier web snafu-s, (Editors Note: Nigerian Internet Scam- My Ass.) George made no attempts to delete either his history or his cookies, as none of it was found in the unallocated sectors EXCEPT both sessions of the chloroform searches.
I know, your saying, Blink, WTH? You just told me Casey deletes, George does not, so which is it??
George was home on March 17th, the first search takes place:
In Comparison, from the Desktop following the above search on 3/17/2008:
Fast Forward to the next search on March 21st, 2008. As Time Sheets corroborate, George Anthony worked a 10 hour day, and was not home until after 5PM. This subsequent search is very different; superficial in contrast.
It is as if the query is “What is chloroform, as if I care?” as opposed to the “How do you make chloroform all-business-search on 3/17. In fact, the activity on 3/21 indicates a return to the last history, or point of fact, Casey is interested in what George was interested in when he plopped down on the computer after her, without opening a new window in Explorer, in this author’s opinion.
As you can see, the available (not in unallocated) space reflects none of Casey’s IM and myspace activity for the same day, which preceded the chloroform searches, and there is no further similar activity attributable to her for the 17th. It is however, (count the cookies with me) George’s M.O.
Did he just plop down at the computer after Casey leaves not realizing he needed to open a new browser? The activity of his after that leads me to believe he realized it and did exactly that, without erasing his “trail.”
What has this got to do with the chloroform? Plenty.
Sandwiched between a few of George’s dalliances: a fetish site, specializing in BDSM, www.alt.com (warning, not for Work viewing or in the presence of children, probably best before lunch.)
One of the topics discussed on such a site, is “breathe play” which is a form of autoerotic asphyxiation in which the use of Chloroform during such an event, or other forced gases or “poppers” like ethyl, butyl and ketamin is common. Yes, before you open another window and check the trunk sniffer report from Dr. Voss, you already know these were found in the air from the trunk.
To date, the FBI quantitative results from the sweepings from the liner, as well as the vacuums seized from the Anthony home have not been released. I suspect they will complete the findings here.
I could never figure out why George would seem “Ok” and almost resigned to Casey’s involvement in his beloved granddaughters death and then give us all whiplash with his support of the rotting pizza farce.
I believe Casey was on to him. She was well aware he was being “escorted” all over Orlando behind her Mother’s back. She told Amy Huizenga her Dad was cheating, her parents were divorcing, she was getting the house; because it was TRUE. She would see to it personally now that George was working 3–11 and making it nearly impossible to feign employment with a toddler on the verge of intelligible conversation, in tow. He began checking Caylee’s piggy bank, her account, asking Caylee about names Casey was using as associates in her *cough* work.
An obstacle indeed for a damsel in a blossoming romance with live baggage. Emphasis on the root word Damn.
It was divide and conquer time for Casey when Cindy finally seeks counseling advice on her situation. The only reason Casey did not pull the trigger on her faux patricide is because she met TonE Lazzaro. She waffled upon the uncertainty of his permanence. For a while, anyway.
In a scenario that allowed me to momentarily feel sorry for Cindy, I knew I needed to kevlar myself for any outcome. Given the circumstances of her own issues, it was not difficult.
So we find ourselves in the conundrum– How does the potential for George owning the chloroform shape up?
Let’s face it. If the sweepings and the cleaning gadgetry seized from the Anthony’s contain similar chemical/Bio to the trunk liner this is all over.
If it does not, the chloroform, ownership and acquisition of same, is paramount to this case. Speaking on the condition of anonymity, I have interviewed a FEMA Hazmat Biotech specialist and a Chemist PhD Fellow on staff at Johnson & Johnson. Both told me the amount of chloroform found in that trunk in conjunction with the etymology live cycle does not jive.
In other words, if we believe the chloroform was in the trunk as the murder weapon, or even dumped in it as a frame job prior to it’s abandonment on June 27, 2008, by their calculations, the degrading chloroform would act as an insecticide of sorts. At the very least, would not register so high in the air sample but very high in the composition found in the liner. Once chloroform is vaporized, In their opinion, a better explanation would be that chloroform was dumped in the trunk closer to when the car was picked up, or July 15. On July 16th it was impounded and placed in a climatic controlled environment. A stabilizer, if you will. Chloroform is also known to burn at very high temperatures. Given the levels, it is possible in the Flordia heat the amount of chloroform in that trunk might have combusted during the June 27th-July 15th timeframe.
George was emphatic about smelling decomposition in that car. He took the battery out and placed the deathmobile in the garage. Was he concerned it was a fire hazard now as well?
From a defense perspective, George is the perfect patsy. He Leaves gates open, irresponsible with the pool ladder, will lie about the last time he saw his daughter and granddaughter– twice.
Let me be clear. I do not think George Anthony would ever harm a hair on Caylee Marie’s blessed head. I also think he put himself in a position to defend Casey to save his own secrets, brought to his attention ex post facto.
Escorting by its latin name, P-R-O-S-T-I-T-U-T-I-O-N, is illegal in Florida.
There is no doubt in my mind Mr. Anthony was schooled on what might be coming his way if he did not join the formation, pronto.
If there still is in yours, I have provided thumbnails for your perusal and nausea. Be sure and review the pattern of site stat checking, escort site, individual “prospects”, financial account transaction, and yes, in some cases, calendar booking and hotel reservations *trends*.
There’s more. I just did not have the stomach for it.
No wonder the Nigerian Pyramid or deposit scam sounded good to him. Consider the alternative conversation.
Images courtesy of Klaasend
Raw Excell reports courtesy of JWG
Related Posts
Related Posts:
608 Comments
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
JOJO did tell Simon Burch he called the Amscot and Simon Never told him that the car was at the Amscot……The Amscot told JOJO that the car was there for 3 days beofre being towed….This can be heard at this site:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tv1nM9a5n4Q
That being posted for kwiw_bird
kiwi_bird – do you (or anyone) have a link to the statement that tow yard man, Simon Birch, made stating that he was surprised that George knew the car was towed from the Amscot? TIA
—————————————-
excerpt from # 320 kiwi:
when Casey left the car at the Amscot and it was towed the guy at the tow place was suprised when George mentioned the Amscot as being where it was towed from before the tow guy even mentioned it to him PLUS it was not mentioned on the paperwork sent to the Anthonys. How did he know it was at the Amscot?????? It ties in with Casey saying to Tony that her Dad would take care of it….so again how did George KNOW that it was at the Amscot?????????????
————————-
excerpt from Diane Fanning book:
At the front counter, Nicole Lett surprised him when she said that Johnson’s Wreckers had towed the Pontiac at the end of June at the request of Amscot, a payday loan company, on the corner of East Colonial Drive and North Goldenrod Road in Orlando.
George called Cindy again. Then he called Amscot and asked why they’d ordered the car removed from their lot.
——————————
#312 Randie
‘…did she screw up and let her own determination interpose, and she said what SHE wanted?’
Randie, I’m flippin on this. I would have initially believed she came up with her own ‘splanation’. I say this because Cindy shows no regard for good advice. I’m sure she’s been advised to stop trolling and stay off the net, but c’mon! She just can’t resist. The ‘chorolphyll’ searches seemed ‘over thought’ if that makes sense. However, if Blink says she was schooled, I have no reason to doubt her response. They’re worth their weight in gold!
IMO, you’ve been asking some great questions that made me go ‘hmmmmmmmmm?’. I am no expert Randie. Far from it
I would love to know if anyone has an opinion on the neck breaking searches (sorry I keep asking and I won’t again!) How do they tie in?
Merry Christmas friends!
Ragdoll-
If you follow the logical navigation ( I am intentionally simplyfying), it is likely that she followed the google choices that were popping up.
B
ok blink
i know lol moving on
ok I will quit throqing a tantrum! not been a good weekend todays my brithday and I feel depressed yuk I hate birthdays
Yeah im international and at times I speak spanglish what the heck huh… thanks your funny
Happy Birthday Chica
B
p.s
hahahaa good day we survived the holiday
when I am mad I cant even undand me or what the heck I said
blink
I talk to myself too
got to talk to someone intelligent!!
lol
I can’t recall who asked upthread, or rather copied and pasted the statement made by Cindy in an email to Casey. The email stated that Cindy was confused and didn’t know who to believe anymore. Cindy said that George had told her he worked from 9′ish in the morning, until 6:30 in the evening, and hadn’t come home all day.
I got the feeling the poster upthread was asking whether or not Cindy had been confiding in Casey, and was wondering what George was up to. I actually took it to mean something completely different. Not sure if I’m right or not, but hopefully it might help you look at the email in a different light, or from a different perspective, as we all have different views, and maybe help answer any questions you may have had about it….whomever it was that posted that comment.
My take on it was this…..I immediately read that and took it to mean that Cindy was confused, not about whether or not George was doing something with some other woman, or not working, or not following the schedule he had laid out for her. In fact, for me, it wasn’t about George at all. I felt it was a fishing expedition on Cindy’s part, attempting to get some kind of info from Casey about whether or not it was her that had been in and out of the house. Remember this was the time that Casey was supposedly staying somewhere else, possibly even out of town, so far out of town in fact, that a trip to the house to pick up a few things would have been out of the question. I think Cindy was starting to see things missing, food, clothing, etc. A red flag for her was probably that nothing of Caylee’s was missing, but more importantly, Casey was telling her that she was nowhere near the home, so Cindy was simply trying to get Casey to admit to it, or catch her in a lie somehow so she could figure out just where she was, and when she was there, etc. Just my opinion of course, but as I said earlier, sometimes it helps to hear another view on something, as we all perceive things differently. Hope this helps, and sorry I can’t recall who left that comment, and more sorry that I’m too lazy to go back thru all the posts and find the name..ha.
Oh, one more thing….I also saw someone else mention that there are times they have no idea what Blink has said, and stay lost about half the time. I just wanted whoever that was not to feel alone. I read here everyday, many, many times a day. I almost hate to admit it, because it makes me sound like an idiot, but I’m still working on this latest scenario/theory about George. Not just working on it as in…the ins and outs and exactly how it could or couldn’t be George and the chloroform, etc. I’m simply still working on trying to understand about half of what Blink said….period. Pfffftttt, hate to sound like the biggest moronic Blinker, but it is what it is…I’ll get it all figured out in time lol…
To Hornsby: I hope that you thought of your mother when you called the visitors here asshole housewives! I can’t understand why you would feel that those are the only peole who converse with the BLINK. Hope you are proud of yourself and I hope you feel accomplished! I am a housewife and the reason for that is because my kids need me. If you haven’t been watching the news lately a lot of children are dying because they are being murdered, I would rather drive my children to school and pick them up that way no harm comes to either of them Thank you!
Just to clarify, I have not read there, so I am guessing your referring to the post I attempted to put on his site in reply, which he deleted.
What I said is that (sic) that nonsense will bring haters calling us housewife aholes to his site. AND I was correct.
I have both worked 60 hour weeks and been home with my children full time when they were little and let me say, by far, being a stay at home Mom is the hardest job I have ever had.
Most rewarding, yes, but anyone saying it is a breeze is in la la land.
B
blink
your site is the best on the net. making you the target of those with jealousy and mal intent (is that a word)in their hearts.
I think that Mr. H knows that he made a fool of himself. He is probably trying to save face.
Keep up the good work!
we here at blinkoncrime have the uttermost respect for your work.
I like that you admonish us if we say something not so cool and again I respect you for that!we cry tohether we laugh together and we work together and that is the key.
Let’s hope that next year will be a good year for closure and resolution for little caylee! certainly this case has captivated the minds and hearts of many here and abroad.
You do a great job of keeping your readers current with new developments on top of maintaining your family. Your hard work and sacrifice is greatly appreciated.
Just one greatful person among many!!
Chica
Blink, Thank you for your response #322. I also thought the same. “Keep Flying High”
Correction #332
Blink,
The last comment I can see is Dec. 27th at 10:53 am. It is now 5:33 pm cst. Does anyone else have this problem?
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/4824807/Casey-Anthony-Nicole-Lett-Interview
Nicole Lett interview
July 24, 2008
pg 3 of 14
NL: He, well he pretty much gave me the, the type of vehicle it was and asked about where we found the vehicle at. And we told, we told him where we found it. And then in return he said that he hasn’t, he thought the car was up in Jacksonville, Gainesville, somewhere up north. I don’t remember exactly where, but somewhere up there, so.
pg 5
NL: Uhm, so I kind of explained to her how we work the certified letter that goes out. Because she thought the vehicle was up north, well upper Panhandle of Florida.
JW: Right.
NL: So I explained to her that by law we have to mail this letter out for people that don’t know that the vehicle is here and in turn that’s exactly what happened. They didn’t know. So they started like griping about having to pay it. So then I had my supervisor come over and explain it to them too. And in turn then ….
I so desperately want to go to Horns site, but pride and respect for myself and the BLINK keeps me from doing so. I think Richard’s paralegal already works for Casey, he filed motions on her behalf from the jail????
Blink, thank you for all that you do.
I think the best way to handle this quagmire is to end it. If Mr Hornsby wants attention to his opinions to gain notarity and clients so be it. The populus that think his ideas are sound will agree with him no matter. If interested people come to Blinks site they will find intelligent and thought provoking ideas and comments. The majority of commentors seeking answers and justice. I say ignore this subject. It goes no where. Just scratch your head and watch to see what happens. While scratching my head I wonder if he isn’t a plant by the Defense trying to manipulate public opinion. The site he posts on seems to not breath until he comments even when he shoots down all their hard work. Interesting.
Casey has told all her friends about George and his extra activities. Amy RM, Tony to name a few. I wonder if that is why RM had the Choloform item on his face book page? Sort of mocking GEorge. If Casey saw the sites George was looking at I am sure she told her friends to enhance her story of her Parents not getting along. She used this excuse with Tony to allow her to live with him after June 15th. And was the reason she did not want Caylee hearing all of the arguing in the home so she was off with the Nanny. Just a thought no proof. Except Tony admits to just this excuse in his statment.
I wonder if Lyons will use all of this dirt as mitigating the sentence if the verdict is guilty. She does has a social worker speaking with Casey for hours. She did say Casey has private things to discuss with her family. Casey does not acknowledge parents in court. Who will be under the bus next? I do believe the Defense will use its dirt on Kronk if the Judge allows to diminish his credibility. Poor guy. No good deed goes unpunished.
blink-after reading all 300 plus posts i am intriuged as ever–previous posster on occasion-tour wealth of knowledge and sense of humor is so apprciated–again,remember george saying (all of our secrets will be out) the situitation becomes even more tragic–lets get it all out-happy new year
#357 new
‘I think the best way to handle this quagmire is to end it’.
My sentiments exactly! Let’s be done with him and his shenanigans. He’s behaving just as I would expect him to behave when someone has painted themselves into a corner. Striking out at others and disowning the truth especially after an olive branch has been extended lacks virtue of any kind. Which is why I continue to come here. Focus is ALWAYS brought back to the heart of the matter…victims of violence. I personally will not acknowledge comments from him or his trolls, nor will I entertain viewing his blogs or like minded sites.
‘To thine own self be true’
Great advice, and thank you Ragdoll.
B
#345
‘If you follow the logical navigation ( I am intentionally simplyfying), it is likely that she followed the google choices that were popping up’.
B
Of course! That makes perfect sense. Thank you B.
#349 Wendy
Ditto. I am lost half the time myself and cannot recall the fine details like many others who contribute on here. Some of the information and legal jargon is why above my head. If you want the truth or humble opinions with substance, this is the site to be!
#323 MJ
THANK YOU for addressing my question! Another plausible explanation. It does fit in with Blink’s ‘logical navigation’ explanation.
Thank you again for your response friend!
Taking into account the 422 posts made by Richard Hornsby on WS from 11/24/09 – 12/21/09 (less than 30 days) and the time date stamps of said postings, in addition to the time date stamped postings on his blog, as well as InSession, and at least 5 other forums, I am beginning to seriously doubt that you are dealing with one single person, Blink. (chronological log is astounding).
For a “practicing” attorney, he sure has been spending an exhorbent amount of time on the internet each and every day (and isn’t he supposively a newlywed?)
You know, I agree. I got an email with an analyst comparison and timestamps. I think this is an actual campaign, more to follow.
B
This crud with Hornsby blog IMO is getting dangerous, and needs to stop. I draw the line at bringing one’s family into a debate. Have they no decency?
Joanne,
I have thought the same thing, too much time on the internet to have a job. I don’t know which thread he posts on WS but just from his own blog and a few others i have seen him on, there is no way this could be a person with clients, hearings and trials.
“You know, I agree. I got an email with an analyst comparison and timestamps. I think this is an actual campaign, more to follow.
B”
Yeah, surely seems someone has joined the ‘joint’.
I hate to bring it up but I just read the most awful things about Blink at RH by some clown my2cents, getting evil at that cesspool. In my anger I wrote a reply back sorry:
I hate to bring it up but I just read the most awful things about Blink at RH by some clown my2cents, getting evil at that cesspool. In my anger I wrote a reply back sorry:
How do I know you aren’t a liar? You can say anything you want to discredit someone. I see no links or proof to back up your slander of what I consider a lady. I don’t care about her affairs, even though I think you’re full of crap, I don’t care what she called herself in the past or what she may have mistakenly said in the past.
She has theories that are discussed, not set in stone & all are free to agree or as I have done with Blink a time or 2 disagree & she still treats us with respect & she’s almost always right in the end.
When the trial is over many things will come to light that Blink has investigated & predicted months ago.
I care that my goal is the same as Blinks justice for Caylee & you’ll never convince me she’s made a dime off her blog or that her intentions are evil. It’s the only site I’ve been to where just this kind of disgusting flaming & trolling never goes on because she won’t allow it.
That is until who’s turning out to be imo the biggest nastiest online troll & malicious ass hole of all time Richard Hornsby made Blink his target. For what was really a minor misunderstanding that this infectious human waste blew all out of proportion to get publicity for his fledging law practice.
He’s jealous of Sheaffer, Belich, Baez & now Blink because his 15 minutes of fame has never come to fruition & he’s been passed over by TV for Sheaffer “can you blame the station’ just listen to the venom that spews out of his mouth..what a loser.
My2cents– I think you are the pathological liar & Hornsby’s got all the deranged trolls like you riled up into a feeding frenzy against someone you don’t even know. Blinks site was safe until Hornsby ruined it, Sheaffers blog was safe & we loved him & Kathi Belich’s interviews on TV…until Hornsby destroyed that too with his bully tactics & threats….I think I’m seeing a pattern here by jealous Hornsby.
After witnessing what he’s done to others I can’t stand this viscous, degenerate, malicious, slandering sleaze ball Richard Hornsby. Burn in hell Richard karmas a bi*ch. Just like you threatened Blink & said I’m coming…karma is coming Richard…it’s coming.
I know, most unfortunate, wait until he finds out who that is, and what she has been up to. You can’t take it back once you say it, in writing, in public.
B
Sorry for the double paragraph above how did I do that, lol??
Comment by Joanne — December 26, 2009 @ 7:53 pm
Blink, thanks for all your efforts in all the cases you involve yourself in. I not only respect your efforts, but also respect the manner in which you conduct yourself with dignity while dealing with those who do not appreciate your efforts.
I think Anne hit the nail on the head in her description of why Richard Hornsby is yet again attempting to draw attention to himself in hopes it will somehow pay off for him.
Just a quick review of his “successes” he advertises on his site.
2001 – 2003 ASST PUBLIC DEFENDER OFFICE (so cases handed to him)
15 “wins” (one defendant coincidentally named Baez)
2003 – 2004 ASSOCIATE AT WOOLFOLK & JORDAN
2003 – NO “win” cases in 12 months
2004 – 6 “win” cases in 12 months
2005 – 2009 OPENS PRIVATE PRACTICE
2005 – 7 “win” cases in 12 months
2006 – 13 “win” cases in 12 months (MAJORITY DUI)
2007 – 7 “win” cases in 12 months
2008 – 4 “win” cases in 12 months
2009 – 3 “win” cases in 12 months
————————————-
Wow RH’s ‘wins’ have steadily declined..severely. Misplaced anger much….taking his own failures out on other successful productive professionals. Maybe his practice & world is falling apart because he’s just so damn hateful. Misery loves company & I think Richie’s abrasive bravado & crass malice hides a great big chip on his shoulder because of an inferirity complex..or something. The boy just ain’t right!!
#304 Mariann
Kudos to you friend. Great question!
How do I email Blink?
You can post here privately and I will email you if necessary.
B
#353 see poster #341 for a link – thanks guys – I have ADHD and am terrible at saving links but I have a great recall for details – sorry to have someone else to do the legwork for me on that one but it’s cleared up now which veers me off that course
Hi, everyone! Hope you are thoroughly rested and enjoyed a great Christmas!
#358 Wendy, just wanted to poke my nose in on your comments re Cindy’s text to Casey regarding comings and goings from the house. Like you, I never thought Cindy was trying to discover any errant behavior on GA’s part. She was confused and bewildered by what she saw as some kind of disturbances in the house while Casey was handing out baloney about being “away” on a job.
I know Cindy was more definite about her suspicions when she discussed the situation with a friend (Brittany S.?) and how she (Cindy) thought there was evidence that Casey was sneaking back in the home and taking things she needed when she was supposedly out of town. Didn’t Casey bring chicken and freezer pops from home to Lazzaro’s on the day she abandoned the car? This, of course, was after Cindy’s text to Casey re the disturbances.
Cindy’s texting Casey about GA’s schedule on a certain day was Cindy’s way to show Casey that Mama was well aware of Casey’s lies. A little not too subtle Cindy trap to find out where Casey and Caylee really were. As in most of Cindy’s efforts to contain Casey , they went for naught.
I sometimes read Cindy’s texts and feel very sorry for her at this time for I think she saw red flags everywhere. She may even have found evidence of something happening to Caylee in that house. Something told Cindy and GA to poke around the yard, under the playhouse, and around the pool. Something, perhaps, which promptd Cindy to send Lee to find Casy in person. She was that worried.
Unfortunately, sympathy expires rapidly around the Anthonys because they are so very reticent to aid LE in any justice for Caylee and so hell bent to implicate others, any others, in her death.
Wendy Sheesh, I meant that Casey took chucken from the home to Lazarro’s before Cindy’s call to Casey regarding comings and goings.
The missing chicken and refrig stuff would have been another alert that either Casey or, as it later turned out, her peripatetic Nanny were having the run of the Anthony house in Cindy’s and GA’s absence.
In response to # 335 regarding George and the car at Amscot:
Simon Burch, tow yard manager, says he never told George the car was at Amscot and was a bit surprised that George knew that. George tells Simon that he/George called the Amscot and they told him the car was there for 3 days. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tv1nM9a5n4Q
Simon Burch Interview 7 24 08 Johnsons Wrecker 2
Nicole Lett, front desk girl at tow yard, says she told George where the car was towed from (Amscot). (Nicole told George about the Amscot BEFORE Nicole called for her supervisor, Simon Burch, so maybe that is why Simom Burch did not know how George knew?). http://www.docstoc.com/docs/4824807/Casey-Anthony-
Nicole Lett interview
July 24, 2008
Catherine Sanchez, manager at Amscot, tells LE that NOBODY from the car’s owner or their family contacted her after the car was towed. (in other words, George did NOT call the Amscot and find out the car was there for 3 days). http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=46ve4GKFQ2Y
Catherine Sanchez Interview 7/24/08 Amscot
My questions are ….. if Nicole Lett told George the car was towed from the Amscot ….why would George lie about calling the Amscot that same day (July 15, 2008)?
If George already knew (somehow) that the car was abandoned at the Amscot, how did he know that? Did Amy or Jesse tell George the car was there, after Casey called them?
If George knew the car was abandoned at the Amscot, why would George leave it there? And then act surprised when they got the certified letter saying it had been towed?
Is it just a matter of George getting confused with who told him the car had been at the Amscot for 3 days? Either Nicole at the tow yard told George, or the Amscot employee told George?
Casey seems to have chosen her friends by their gullibility level. The more they believed her stories – the more she fed them.
And I agree re: Kronk -
No good deed goes unpunished.
As for Casey – No bad deed goes unpublished!
Wait! Wait! Wait!
#364
Q: Blink, I thought that Cindy made it CLEAR thru her 911 calls that the Pontiac was “stolen!”. In these comments, Cindy as well as George sound so laid-back saying the car was supposed to be “up north somewhere.”
Blink,
In regards to this “bombshell” regarding GA, escorts and cholorform could he try and sue for defamation of charactor if by chance any of this were proven not to be his searches?
I am not an attorney, but I am not dumb enough to put something out that has not been reviewed by one for certain subject matter. I stand behind the piece. I would not have written it if not.
B
A Zenaida story was deleted from another site which was Blink friendly, but now Richard Hornsby praises that site in comparison to Blink’s site.
I’m wondering if Blink might be getting it in the face because she did not bow to some demand to pull her story? The story and along with all its comments (by people like us) disappeared completely, not to reappear. Someone had some pull do to that– or threats? I hope not but can see how dirty this member of the FLA Bar can get.
I will read there again, but wonder if a site would give out it’s private info on commentators– if you have to take down a story, you might be pressured into giving up reader’s information. This lawyer uses a ‘threats’, looks like they work.
Not saying which site but clearly the owner had to make a choice– go down with Blink, or wipe the story (which included the lawyer’s comments).
Kleat, I am not sure I understand what your talking about, I will keep private as necessary as you know..
B
Blink, I understand that you may not feel it’s appropriate to post that –
Wendy, guess what I consider myself a “moronic Blinker too!!!!” I also read many times during the day (dont tell my boss), and have to read what our dear Blink writes multiple times. She is always on the money and I love to read here. Sooo much great info and great minds. But I just plug along here best I can and am grateful for this site. So we can form a club within a club!!!! Keep reading and I will too.
Many of us are retired! many of us left our jobs to insure our children had the proper childcare.Many of us have jobs.
So that is a very cruel inmature thing for him to say. Where did this seed of hate originate? You can feel the evil vibes pouring out of him.
Long time reader—first time posting.
Blink—- My Grams would have called you a “scrapper” which would have been a HUGE compliment! Keep the faith and keep on scrappin’.
You are the voice for so many who have none. I am not alone in respecting that tremendously!
May your blessings out weigh your troubles each and every day!
Thanks and welcome.
Scrapper, huh? That’s a first.
B
kiwi_bird # 381 – I have new questions regarding George knowing the car was at Amscot at comment # 384. The manager of the Amscot told LE that George NEVER called them, while George told Simon Burch the tow yard manager that he did call Amscot about the car. Why the lie from George? Or is this just a case of confusion on George’s part? Is it a significant untruth? Does it lead to anything?
Blink,,,,regarding #387….WHEW! I know all that about you but its GA and CA that worried me trying to get back at you….(Cindee is now wiping her brow, whew)
Lol. Got it.
B
Blink,
RH has indicated over the last couple of days that he will be momentarily posting his new blog which promises a scathing expose on Jose Baez (and I believe stated you are next in line).
A connection between Baez and this attorney has been documented publicly, but are you aware of any followup to how extensive this relationship became and why it became revengeful?
Are you referring to Baez/Hornsby? What prior connection are you referring to?
B
Hope everyone had a nice Holiday.
In addition to Nicole Lett telling George about the car being at Amscott…..
Cindy said in her deposition with the State Para: When George called her at work from I assume Johnsons Tow Yard and told her Casey’s car was there, that she called Casey and either Casey called her back or she finally got a hold of her within a few minutes.
Maybe that was the TEXT para: “Found your Car Today, Huge Problem” or something to that effect (going from memory here) Cindy told Casey to come home, she had some explaining to do. Cindy said she did not want to deal with it over the phone. I would again “assume” that (during that short call is when Casey told Cindy about the car being at Amscott and also that it was out of gas)
Although until that last deposition, I dont remember Cindy ever stating that she had taled to Casey prior to picking up the car.
But I do remember the statment by George to Simon “We found our Daughter today, but not my granddaughter” So I again assume that George was (in his mind) referring to the fact that Cindy had talked to Casey a short time earlier.
Blink,
I don’t often post, but I read your site regularly…I read it for 3 reasons: first for the info. you share on the case as like so many I want true justice for Caylee, 2nd. for the wonderful insight many of the posters on your sight share and 3rd. because from reading all you have written throughout this case I know you have justice for Caylee as your priority. Thank you for all you do, and please don’t let any other person (or persons words) discourage you. As a Mom and a new Grandmother this whole case has teared at my heartstrings. I don’t believe in the death penalty but I do hope Casey gets LWOP. Keep doing what you are doing Blink, because you are helping bring justice for an innocent little Angel. Blessings to you Blink, thank you for all you do.
TY
B
suz, I get your point, but I still think that someone (maybe a friend of KC’s) knows if KC was getting paid to do the deed. Such a high profile case..I figured someone would say something. But what do I know, Im married, I gotta do it sans cashola