Caylee/Casey Anthony Case: Casey Anthony’s Defense Has Gone To The Dogs
As previously reported on blinkoncrime.com, the hearing last week ordering Jose Baez and his defense team to submit specific information regarding their expert witnesses, has gone to the dogs.
Woof!
Dr. Fairgrieve, a forensic anthropologist and expert witness listed for the defense, intends to testify that Casey Anthony should have the right to confront her accuser.
Novel, appropriate, good news.
In this instance, one of her accusers with fur, according to her defense attorney, is named Gerus. The other, Bones.
For starters, if the summary of Dr. Fairgrieve’s findings is accurate as presented in this filing, I recommend as a practical matter, he identify exactly what “alerts” he is seeking to debunk.
There are several, all of which are well documented.
Orange County sheriff’s investigator Carlos Padilla told reporters, “We had two different dogs from two different counties that hit on the same exact spot.”
Evidence Bay with a closed car:
Casey Anthony’s Car: Detectives reported a different dog alerted to the same strong smell in the trunk after the white Pontiac had been abandoned in a parking lot.
“They have a hypothesis that the child may have somehow passed away,” Dr. Richard Weinblatt told Eyewitness News.
It is undoubtedly the recent work of Dr. Fairgrieves in a case involving a murdered man, Robert Wone, that got the attention of Jose Baez and his Scheme-Team.
In a successful inlimine motion, Fairgrieves offered testimony in the supporting affidavit that suppressed canine evidence in the Robert Wone murder.
The three male house mates of Mr. Wone were acquitted of the charges they faced as a result, which were not for his murder. The prosecutor himself could not prove his actual cause of death. The trio are currently facing a wrongful death action by the desceadent’s family.
“My role in the case is basically peer review,” Fairgrieve told the Orlando Sentinel. “I will be reviewing reports on the evidence. So far everything I’ve done has been remotely.” Scott Fairgrieve, MD
The ole probative vs. prejudicial argument is not unexpected in this case, I get it.
However, two different cadaver dogs, from two different counties, hit in the same area under or near Caylee’s playhouse. This was AFTER the alerts in the evidence bay on the car trunk, and both searches were conducted with permission from the Anthonys.
That would be the car trunk that produced one latent lift from the accused in this case, Casey Anthony.
Under Dr. Fairgrieve’s theory of “necessary corroboration”, we, in fact, have exactly that.
The hairs that were found in the trunk, including the hair with the “signs of decomposition” corroborate the canine’s alert as well as the report from Oak Ridge Labs.
Let us not forget, that a statement from the car’s owner and material witness in this case, concurs with the presence of decomposition in the damn car.
Reached late this afternoon prior to his Canine Christmas Mixer, www.blinkoncrime.com caught up with Gerus:
Seriously, that dude has my dander up daily. He needs to stay out from under my collar.
I know what I am doing at my job. And by the way, who is calling who a TOOL?
You tell that *My Cousin Vinny wanna be* that he should take his unearned legal hubris and shove it, where in my line of work, I don’t have to sniff.
Unlike him.
Speaking of hubris, a message to George-
The headline is not going to read ” Casey Anthony Not Guilty of Murder By Hereditary Hubris”
It is going to read..
“Apparent Shared Hubris Defect Cause for Casey Anthony to Blame Father in Caylee’s Death.”
Be like a burger and flip already. It’s all you got.
ps. “Shared Hubris Defect” is mine, J to the B.
Related Posts
Related Posts:
260 Comments
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
waving at all my friends here~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Found it. Off-topic, but shows the risks of allowing any manipulative person into the crime scenes and searches, she even had her police friends fooled. But how did a K9 handler or evaluator not clue in to this dog’s training and responses– he obviously didn’t need to be reliable and maintained to a high level to find planted evidence where his handler knew it was.
Director of search team is charged with faking evidence
BY DAVID ASHENFELTER
Knight Ridder Newspapers
KRT) – A Midland, Mich., woman who has received international acclaim using a cadaver-sniffing dog to crack homicide cases was charged in federal court Monday with planting evidence at crime scenes.
The government said Sandra Anderson, 43, planted human bones at crime scenes in Oscoda, Bay City and Oakland County, Mich., between October 2000 and April 2002.
The charges were filed by lawyers for the U.S. Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division in Washington. They wouldn’t discuss the case. Anderson was charged on criminal information, the route prosecutors often use when suspects are considering pleading guilty.
“All I can tell you is that nothing has been firmly resolved on any of those issues yet – discussions are ongoing,” Anderson said. She referred reporters to her lawyers, who said they couldn’t comment.
The government charged Anderson with lying to investigators and witness tampering. The maximum penalty for making false statements is five years in prison and a $250,000 fine. The maximum penalty for witness tampering is 10 years in prison and a $250,000 fine. Under federal sentencing guidelines, suspects usually face considerably less time.
The government said Anderson and her dog, Eagle, searched Michigan’s Huron National Forest in June 2001 and April 2002 for a 20-year-old Oscoda woman who vanished in 1980.
The government accused Anderson of planting and pretending to discover human bones and carpet fiber at the site.
Oscoda Township Police Chief Robert LaVack said investigators, several of whom were suspicious of Anderson after she and her dog found some two dozen human bones in the national forest. Tests showed the bones came from other humans, not the missing woman.
“This one hurt,” he said.
The government said Anderson lied to the FBI and Justice Department about planting human bones in Oscoda and at the Proud Lake Recreational Center in Oakland County in January 2002 and at a business in Bay City in October 2000.
It’s unclear what police were investigating at the other sites. Also unclear is whether anyone was convicted on the basis of her searches.
The government also said she tampered with witnesses in the federal court.
———————————-
Maybe none of this happened in the Caylee search, but funny things were going on with Laura Buchanan and her attempts to manipulate witnesses. Jordan might have been one of the early targets to get on board, and he responded by recording the evidence now sealed.
One of the things I will say, is that the search regulations via TES for the November search for Caylee took the possibility of something like this, sadly, into consideration. I hate to say this, but this woman deserves to do time if she interfered in an investigation, and moreover, wth did she get human bones from?
B
Found several related articles all at one site:
http://leerburg.com/fake.htm
Blink,
These good people “searchers” were trying to help to find Caylee, and why in the world would they just hide important photos from LE and defense? JJ got into this mess because of LB, IIRC and also because JS allowed the 32 searchers to be interviewed.
It’s so sad that people now will be afraid to volunteer to help to search for missing children, KC’s attorneys have turned this into such a mess, I just can’t believe it.
Are they going to subpoena every single one of us bloggers? I guess that this is KC’s defense next step.
Hi, Chica, Waving back. Love your comments, especially about Bozo. You seem to be a gal in the know. Just full of tidbits of info. Maybe “PPP” should listen to you.
Are you still of the opinion that they do have prints on the tape? Hopefully Casey’s. I would love to know your thoughts about this. Thanks
I am.
B
(((((((((((((((((
Thank you for your answer, as I posted the other day I hang my hat on your answers, and trust them with my being. I know that’s alot of trust, but to me so far you have proven to be well knowledged, in the know, and I love your work. I pray you are right! Wont the prosecution have to release this in the docs at some point, do you think they are saving the best for last.
P.S. How long do we have to wait for another article? I know you and your team stay very busy, so I dont want you to feel like I am rushing you. I start to crave a article from Blink and Co. after a while! LOL(-meaning laugh out loud, not lots o luck)!
I agree Casey is smart- unfortunately she used her smarts for all the wrong things IMO.
Blink, what do you think their strategy is/was?
And, what was going on ,if you know, in court Monday with HJP Mason and JP mention of Judge Eaton leaving the court room… Was it just HJP making a joke or am I missing more than I think?
BTW too funny about the N. Rockewell painting- Priceless- I’ll never look at that painting in quite the same way again…
My dearest Mom 3.0, I am going to defer for a bit on your question if it is ok, it is part of a larger piece I hope to get to, and I think it is important in case JB wants to use it in a motion.
ROTFL
B
lol 5.USTWIN57 says:
funny and thank you! I just follow along as much as I can. I doing alot of reading at the hinky meter here there and everywhere. There are many with brighter bulbs than mine. I thank you anyways! havent seen you before or have I hmm
anyways welcome.
I will say one thing!
wheres my dramamine because I am feeling the onset of motion sickness! here soon by the defense. Back on the roller coaster to nowhere!!
Now I am thouroughly convinced as blink once said!
the defense is coming here and S.M to read.I have never ever eva! heard of such bad lawyering as I am seeing and hearing about this arrogant man with no justified cause to be so.
He comes into court so unprepared! doesnt cite case law! insults and says the most ignorant things! All his supporters are jumping ship quicker than I change my big girl chonies!!
Blink
Ya said once or twice that this case would plea out now what do you think?
clearly they have nothing to present in her defense. And the honorable judge perry is getting tired of baez. His revenge is always to follow up with many motions! if he doesnt get what he wants. I hope this case ends his short career or death row will bulging like a preganant woman carry octobabies!!
anyways blink
I think they may have to plead if the state chooses to allow them!
Blink, are you thinking the judge in the gallery, has signed on to the defense team? Or was he there for a consultation slash second-opinion, possibly on the high-tech courtroom and the cameras?
The reason it was simple to know what Casey was reading in that Red Huber photo, was not that the text could be recognized, but simply because of watching the hearing, knowing that Jeff Ashton and Baez made comments about the ‘stipulation’ being signed and that was probably in reference to the DNA being sent off to the Pennsylvania lab. Casey was looking over the document, and on video, can be seen adding her signature to those legal length papers. 2 + 2 = the stipulation agreed upon by both sides, nothing private, confidential about that. If the defense didn’t want this big document showing up, then they could have arranged to have their client sign it before entering the courtroom, or in jail, or attorneys could have stood between her and the camera at the end of the hearing.
Kleat I am not clear on the issue of his honor leaving the court room at all.
The whole image thing was silly. While the attorney client privilege is, and should remain sacrisaint, there should be no expectation of privacy outside of controlling one’s own audio and communication with the knowledge that they are on damn camera, hello? Public funds, public courtroom, period.
B
If the state allows a plea if Casey wants one, then the defense will be able to say that’s the reason, and the only reason the state put the dp on the table to begin with.
If the defense offers a plea and states the reason they are doing so is because they cannot win an aquittal in their opinion, in MY opinion, CJ Perry will not accept it and the case will be tried.
Nothing short of an admission of guilt and full disclosure of this crime will be accepted as a proffer for plea purposes imo, or there would be no deal- proceeds to trial.
Let’s all remember, the prosecution represents CAYLEE ANTHONY, the victim in this case, and they are duty bound.
B
Chica – you are priceless!!! I always cotton onto your meanings where I sometimes need time to ‘interpret’ others comments. Keep contributing friend.
@ # 8. Chica
I have definately fallen off this roller coaster ride and it is NOT a thrill, this team keeps me so confused my head feels like I have been hit with a football bat. Please pass the dramine, I second that “motion” sickness coming on. These Bozo’s surely can and did screw up a one car funeral. Prayer for seeing JUSTICE for little Caylee.
Chica,
I personally dont see her pleaing out because she would have to give a full confession, and in Casey’s twisted mind, she has not done anything wrong. I dont think, IMO she will EVER confess. PLus, I think the state is ready to see this one through. They have given her way to many chances to take a plea and confess. If I were prosecution, NO plea deal. Too Late! Prob a good thing for Casey I am not prosecution huh? LOL
Knowing I am among friends, I will offer this far-fetched notion about Judge Eaton in the court room. I am (almost) convinced the duhfense will do anything at this point to get a mistrial or releaved of duty. What if mason jar is acting . . . “what did you say?” or “that was before I got here” or “I know I wasn’t here at 5″ etc etc. Then we have bozo who is not acting, but is acting dumber than usual. mason jar said he had another case in the same court house . . . maybe before Judge Eaton and he doesn’t act the same as when he is before Judge Perry.
Anyway, I know Judge Perry will not be snookered by anybody in a court room! His Honor and Mr. Morgan, Esquire I would love to have dinner and have great conversations.
Link to video of yesterday’s (Wed 1-5-11) hearing – Duces Ticum, Joseph Jordan photos – In Session:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8twqTVs6ZGY
Sister
What you said makes alot of sense to me. I found this elsewhere and thought it was funny ! especial being it happened in florida! the state that will provide the crate of oranges that Mason will use to pay Mr. Henry Lee to go in his orange chow mein! Or is it sukiaki.
http://www.wftv.com/news/26368921/detail.html
Somehow this reminded me of the defense’s actions lol
Camsmom says:
You maybe right ! I know blink mentioned it a long time ago! but this has been going on so long that I have since have gotten somewhat senile and hard of hearing!! hmmm who does that sound like?
Hiya chelsea
good to see you!! ya know amongst the sadness we need to filter in some humor! or we willl go crazy!
Just here to support you all and blink in our quest for justice for caylee.
I wonder if the honorable judge perry keeps a tab on how many people baez has tried to blame for caylee’s death! Funny how no mention of the nanny! how can that be if that was caseys claim and with the help of tube sox lee!! hammer totin’ cindy and Hinkel/gas can george. hmmmm
16.USTWIN57
yeah the roller coaster ride has taken so many twists and turns!
so many people throwed under the bus.
I cannot wait untill trial time I cannot wait for the verdict to be read!!
I will clear my schedule of a no life blogger to sit in day in and day out until justice is served.
Hey maybe we can sell tshirts that says
LOL LOTS OF LUCK
BILL SHEAFFER: Analysis On Granted Motion In Casey Case
http://www.wftv.com/video/26393038/index.html
Judge’s Order
http://www.wftv.com/pdf/26390295/detail.html
http://www.wftv.com/news/26390467/detail.html
Casey’s Attorney Ordered To Pay Nearly $600
OH HOW I LOVE BILL SHAEFFER
I know all the newspapers are distributed throughout the city! so we know baez has seen and heard what the people in legal and otherwise are saying about him!! love it he is so deserving.
I see nobody has commented!
I think blink is holding us in
comment pergatory!
Good Evening Blink!
It has been awhile, usually have been just reading which I do enjoy doing at your site. I find it very enlightening and look forward to your new posts. Since a name was mentioned in a post on this site. I do have an inquiry?
Judge Eaton that was referred to as leaving the courtroom on Monday during the Anthony case was he The Honorable O.H. “Bill” Eaton, Jr.?
BILL SHEAFFER: Analysis On Granted Motion In Casey Case
http://www.wftv.com/video/26393038/index.html
this is too good . . . what’s another word for hubris?
roflmao
H U B R I S.
lol sister, you kill me, that mind of yours.
I felt like I watched that under my covers or between my fingers over my eyes it was that painful.
I say that, but I know it does not matter “her boyz”.
B
In my opinion, Mr. Hubris has not only bragged to the media, but he bragged to the experts and other lawyers he wanted to bring on board. His obsession with Laura Buchanan and JJ and the so-called “evidence” that Caylee’s little body was not in that place until after Casey was in jail makes me think that he exaggerated those claims to anyone who would listen and stating to his colleagues that he had “proof” of her innocence. Now, it is one thing to stand up in front of the media and put on a show. But professional colleagues probably expected that he would be straight with them. This is why I think so many jumped on board with such enthusiasm – He HAD Proof! But as each one realized that he had never investigated any of these claims and as these “proofs” have fallen apart, so have the colleagues fallen away.
I think that Mr. Hubris is lying to Casey and tells her whatever he thinks she wants to hear. She is happy to have him interpret the law to her and if he tells her that what happened in the courtroom on Monday is just more evidence that she is being persecuted and that the state is punishing him because of his vigourous defense of her, she is all too happy to believe him.
Good Morning Everyone,
Am I imagining this or did Mr. Bozo Hubris LIE yesterday to Judge Perry.
When JP was asking JB if during JJ desposition if they asked him if he had any photos or took any photos JB said NO…we did not know about it until after the deposition.
At the tail end of JP asking JB about this JP again asked JB if they asked JJ if he had photos or took photos and JB said yes…isn’t that what he said? Why am I thinking he contradicted himself just to get that subpeona?
Blink,
With the hearing this week, and the smack down of Jose, I have to ask myself what if this were my adult child behind this eight ball.
If it were my child, yes if they say you are guilty then I am here for the state until you prove otherwise. (I love you but I don’t have to like you).
As this childs parent, I am helping the state, and also helping my child by making sure his/her attorney is doing the best possible job, with the infromation that you have given to him.
As this childs parent, I am visiting you weekly, and I will continue to try and visit each and everyday that you turn me down.
As this childs parent, I want to know what happened to my grandchild, and I want the words straight out of the horses mouth!
As this childs parent, who I know full well is of legal age. I want answers as to why you continue to use this gentlemen for your attorney, and let him/her know what a laughing stock he has made of you and the courts.
I know she has taken this little Angels life however I have to wonderful why her family will not put up a fight to see her. So Help Me God Blink I just don’t get it! Casey is not someone to be told what to do, when to do it, or how to do it…… Why is she being kept from her family. Does she know that Jose is not able to win this case for her, and she is going to be the next hankie stuffed into his suit pocket forever!
Because they are focused on her impossible aquittal, period.
Keep in mind, Baez is calling all the shots here. Does anyone really think he wants the Anthony Police Agents soliciting information that could get him fired?
JC Mason was very telling, imo, when he responded to the judge that he “WOULD NOT” be held in contempt after 30+ years of practicing criminal law-
Translation: I will jump ship before I am associated with further shenanigans.
I can only pray Mason is developing his own relationship with Casey, and she wises up and fires him.
If she does, I predict, as I always have, Mason will negotiate a plea.
B
By the way, Don’t care if he sucks for her or not, or that she becomes his next snot rag…. I just want to understand how you shut the door on your family… It’s beyond my me how someone does that.
Because cindee he did contradict himself. He’s not such a good liar. One must have a good memory and obviously he forgot to send Dr. Lee the crate of oranges, he forgot to re-kronk Mr. Kronk, he forgot to ask pertenient questions of JJ at the depo, he forgot to ask the ex-co-counsel who is no longer practicing law because of forgetfulness (yeah! right!) the names and addresses of the 100 people who could free his client, and he forgot that possibly someone else may have read all the documents and discovery and watched all the tapes from the get-go. His fish hole is getting deeper and deeper all the time. Unfortunately, his hole is not filled with facts nor fish, it’s full of ****.
Blink yohoo over here!
What is your take on Judge Eaton in the courtroom?
I know you have a thought or two on it.
tia
You know chica, right now, I really do not, keep in mind, anyone can observe the proceedings, it is public.
B
Sister…..LoL….roar you are correct my dear. Just to humor me let us say he did contradict himself or “LIE” when pressured. Is anyone going to do anything about that? I really thought he said at the end that he did as JJ if he had any pictures and that this JJ person said yes…
according to the Caylee Daily, C. Mason has not visited Casey in jail since August…very telling if accurate, and we are left with only our opinions as to why, and like the saying goes “opinions are like rear-ends, everybody’s got one.” Hhave a great weekend everyone, I’m off to the Magic game!
Blink- thats okay- I look forward to your next article. thank you for taking the time to reply.
Have you seen the motion to exclude the testimony of the State’s plant expert Blink?
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/68726576/20101230-Motion-to-Exclude-Unreliable-Evidence-of-Plant-or-Root-Growth
Blink,If you can, what are your thoughts regarding this motion, and if the defense is successful in excluding this experts testimony- do you think it is detrimental to the State’s case?
I would think with all the other evidence- the water levels, the trunk evidence- the flies, the grave wax, the cell pings ect- that the state does not NEED this expert/testimony- but I would very much like to hear your thoughts. TIA
Ps- Thanks to Muzikman of WS for posting this Doc-
This motion will be denied.
B
I so thoroughly enjoy Bill Shaffer’s comments but his most recent one leaves me scratching my head a bit. I understand all that he said about Jose Baez’s handling of defense discovery. But Mr Shaffer seems to have given Cheny Mason a complete pass on this one. In Monday’s hearing on the motion for sanctions, it was Mr Mason who rebutted.
It was Cheney Mason who began his remarks with, “I take substantial unbridge at the representation just made by council.” He ended his remarks with this:
(starting @ 31:30 minutes into part 1 of the 1-3-11 hearing):
“One last thing I want to remind you about. Mr Baez filed a pleading (I’ve seen it, it’s on your file over on your conputer there) with respect to expert witnesses, telling who they are, where they are, what their field of expertise is, the subject matter they are going to testify to; but they have not provided a script, nor are they required to provide a script under any rule. How would we know what they’re going to testify to until the time comes to see what the State puts on.
And what IS the State’s problem with taking depostions? How difficult is it to take the deopsition of someone; one, they’ve already Googled; two, they know about professionally anyway and ask that person what they have done in this case, when they have done it and so forth; just as I’ve had to do with 130 witnesses. We don’t have reports, we can’t create reports. We have given what we have.”
P.S. Jose Baez asserted the same thing in the Dec 10th hearing (before Judge Perry issued the order clarifying discovery rules and the revised deadline). Baez stated;
“Short of a script of what they’re [experts] going to testify to, I’d be more than happy to tell Mr Ashton whatever he needs to know.”
The only difference; Mason made his statements AFTER the clarifcation order.
http://www.wftv.com/video/26354520/index.html
I agree with you in theory, but I really think the legal community is praying Mason pulls this debacle out of the alley scrap it is right now. I have to say, I do not know what the agreement between Mason and Baez, but does everyone realize because this is a capital case, technically Mason is the lead counsel in this case?
B
http://www.ninthcircuit.org/news/High-Profile-Cases/Anthony/DownloadsOrder%20Denying%20Motion%20to%20Seal%20Penalty%20Phase%20Discovery.pdf
Motion Denied.
Our Blink will be hearting His Honor ever more.
This scream team will not be granted a motion to use the men’s room by the time this is over.
B
DONT SEEM LIKE CASEY IS GETTING VISISTS FROM HER OWN ATTORNEY THE MAIN SQUEEZE.
Blink your response to claudia makes alot of sense to me.
Great post claudia.
hi cindeefromwisconsin
good to see you its been a while. waving~~~
Sister
His lies are becoming crystal clear to the honroable judge and now its time for caylee to get justice. I think the judge feels that baez is not doing right by casey! he is going to get her killed or sent up for life because of his lack of efforts. He has his priorities all messed up trying to get even with everyone he almost has the same mentality as cindy. tragic
I must be dense but what does hubris mean?
Thanks Blink, Don’t know about her and Mr. Mason. Does not appear to be a strong one. However stranger things have happened in this case. Tell me if Mr. Mason should jump ship, that leaves Jose, and then Fennel would become the death qualified attorney to let Jose ride on her rump, and keep his no knowledge chair?
I Just seen this elsewhere
LOOK!!!! ORANGE COUNTY JAIL WHERE CASEY LIVES !! HAHAHAHAHA
ORANGE COUNTY, Fla. — A major roach infestation forced an investigation into the Orange County jail Friday. Hundreds of inmates waiting in line to eat found roaches in their food. Cherry Daleo talked to WFTV about a call her son made from jail after the disturbing discovery. “He said, I just got a roach as an appetizer on my lunch,” Daleo said, “my son almost threw up.”
County jail officials confirmed one of its food delivery trucks made a delivery with cockroaches crawling on the plates.
Allen Moore with the Orange County jail said, “It was discovered by both inmates as it was being served by our staff that there was a roach infestation in some of the trays that were off loaded.”
http://www.wftv.com/news/26407437/detail.html
Report to moderator 50.8.201.143
Hi everybody – Happy New Year to all at BOC. Coming out of lurk mode to express my happiness at what appears to be many a smackdown from Judge Perry………….The latest from WESH:
“Casey Judge Won’t Seal Penalty Phase Witness List
Perry Says Defense’s Argument Didn’t Meet Legal Requirements”
I can only hope this continues! Looks to me like the SS Casey is taking on water & sinking fast…….And Bozo is trying to bail with a sieve.
Hope May gets here quick & Caylee finally gets the justice she deserves. I pray 2011 will be Caylee’s year, and that she will finally get to rest in peace. I don’t know about the rest of you – but I’m real tired of this 3 ring circus…..
God Bless all!
What a shocker to see Amy, Ricardo, Jesse Grund, Tony Lazzarro, and Tony Rusciono on the penalty phase witness list. These are all the friends the Anthony’s and Baez tried to throw under the bus. Blink, do you really think these kids knew they were on this list? She literally screwed each and everyone of them. WTH would they have to say that could possibly save her life? Aren’t they all state witnesses also?
Yes. I doubt highly this was the list they wanted to seal, originally.
B
Hello All- Thanks for posting the recent goings on in the case. Blink thanks for your responses.
I just wanted to comment on the penalty phase witnesses.
I agree with Blink, that the names we have seen are not the ones that Finell wished to be held back.
My thought on her friend Amy and her x- boyfriends- is not one of shock however. First, Amy seemed like a genuinely caring person. I think she would not want Casey to die., and I am sure she can share some good things about her one-time friend.
Jesse Grund, regardless of what Casey believed, seemed to genuinely love her, along with Caylee of course. He is also very religious, so I would think that his beliefs go against the death penalty. But I too think he would not wish to see Casey put to death for other reasons as well. He can share stories of the Casey he knew and loved, the one that he did not recognize in the Casey of this case.
I am sure that AR and Tl also can share some good thoughts about Casey. I don’t think it is a stretch to think they would want her life spared.
Having said all this, even if these thoughts regarding her friends are true, I think perhaps the reason they are on this list is for other reasons also- I would think that all of these men, from Casey’s past may have knowledge of Casey’s accusal of George or Lee of sexual abuse. We know that TL and JG did have conversations with Casey about her purported sexual abuse. Does Amy and Anthony R also have memories of such conversations to share?
Also I would think that this group of friends could also remember a thing or to regarding Casey’s interactions/feelings about/with her mother,Cindy- perhaps giving some insight to how Casey felt trapped by her over-bearing mother ect.
Perhaps I am reaching, and these instances/conversations have nothing to do with why they are on the penalty phase witness list. IDK- but I would think that could be a reason…
All JMO
Hi Sister, the link wouldn’t work for me – anyone else having a problem? Message says might be removed. I hate not being able to ‘enjoy’ Bozo’s slapdown at leisure!!
found elsewhere but didnt know this:
did any of you?
LOOK! I didnt know perry was judge when grand jury indighted kc. heres video I am sure all you guys have seen it but incase their is someone like me who still is catching up on everything in this case I like to share
http://www.wftv.com/video/17714433/index.html