Caylee/Casey Anthony Case: Casey Anthony’s Defense Has Gone To The Dogs
As previously reported on blinkoncrime.com, the hearing last week ordering Jose Baez and his defense team to submit specific information regarding their expert witnesses, has gone to the dogs.
Woof!
Dr. Fairgrieve, a forensic anthropologist and expert witness listed for the defense, intends to testify that Casey Anthony should have the right to confront her accuser.
Novel, appropriate, good news.
In this instance, one of her accusers with fur, according to her defense attorney, is named Gerus. The other, Bones.
For starters, if the summary of Dr. Fairgrieve’s findings is accurate as presented in this filing, I recommend as a practical matter, he identify exactly what “alerts” he is seeking to debunk.
There are several, all of which are well documented.
Orange County sheriff’s investigator Carlos Padilla told reporters, “We had two different dogs from two different counties that hit on the same exact spot.”
Evidence Bay with a closed car:
Casey Anthony’s Car: Detectives reported a different dog alerted to the same strong smell in the trunk after the white Pontiac had been abandoned in a parking lot.
“They have a hypothesis that the child may have somehow passed away,” Dr. Richard Weinblatt told Eyewitness News.
It is undoubtedly the recent work of Dr. Fairgrieves in a case involving a murdered man, Robert Wone, that got the attention of Jose Baez and his Scheme-Team.
In a successful inlimine motion, Fairgrieves offered testimony in the supporting affidavit that suppressed canine evidence in the Robert Wone murder.
The three male house mates of Mr. Wone were acquitted of the charges they faced as a result, which were not for his murder. The prosecutor himself could not prove his actual cause of death. The trio are currently facing a wrongful death action by the desceadent’s family.
“My role in the case is basically peer review,” Fairgrieve told the Orlando Sentinel. “I will be reviewing reports on the evidence. So far everything I’ve done has been remotely.” Scott Fairgrieve, MD
The ole probative vs. prejudicial argument is not unexpected in this case, I get it.
However, two different cadaver dogs, from two different counties, hit in the same area under or near Caylee’s playhouse. This was AFTER the alerts in the evidence bay on the car trunk, and both searches were conducted with permission from the Anthonys.
That would be the car trunk that produced one latent lift from the accused in this case, Casey Anthony.
Under Dr. Fairgrieve’s theory of “necessary corroboration”, we, in fact, have exactly that.
The hairs that were found in the trunk, including the hair with the “signs of decomposition” corroborate the canine’s alert as well as the report from Oak Ridge Labs.
Let us not forget, that a statement from the car’s owner and material witness in this case, concurs with the presence of decomposition in the damn car.
Reached late this afternoon prior to his Canine Christmas Mixer, www.blinkoncrime.com caught up with Gerus:
Seriously, that dude has my dander up daily. He needs to stay out from under my collar.
I know what I am doing at my job. And by the way, who is calling who a TOOL?
You tell that *My Cousin Vinny wanna be* that he should take his unearned legal hubris and shove it, where in my line of work, I don’t have to sniff.
Unlike him.
Speaking of hubris, a message to George-
The headline is not going to read ” Casey Anthony Not Guilty of Murder By Hereditary Hubris”
It is going to read..
“Apparent Shared Hubris Defect Cause for Casey Anthony to Blame Father in Caylee’s Death.”
Be like a burger and flip already. It’s all you got.
ps. “Shared Hubris Defect” is mine, J to the B.
Related Posts
Related Posts:
260 Comments
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
Blink, any Morgan news?
Hello Chica, waving back from the Frozen Tundra Of WI…
I am here a couple times per day reading and rereading. I look forward to reading everything ALL of have to say as I have said in the past it helps me understand what exactly is going on. Regarding the post by Nora and the witnesses on the penalty witness list I would think the state would ask these kids exactly what kind of liar, maniuplater and thief the Momster really is.
Hi, Blink, this one is still in moderation:
annals says:
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
January 7, 2011 at 5:26 pm
I am wondering why I can’t find the nearly 1000 pages of discovery Cheney Mason said on Mon 1-3-11 was handed to him. Isn’t discovery generally up in the media within days of when it’s been handed to the defense? Has anyone seen it anywhere?
I also can’t find the penalty phase witness list refered to by Nora in a previous comment. Can anyone give a link or source for that?
Re:
chica says:
January 8, 2011 at 9:34 pm
Wow, Chica thanks for that. No, I did’t know Judge Perry presided in the grand jury which indicted Casey. I never saw this video and found Judge Perry & Attorney General Lamar’s remarks to the grand jury interesting, to say the least. For anyone who has not seen this 5 minute video of the conclusion of the 2008 grand jury and indictment of Casey Anthony, it’s worth a look. I am linking this video Chica brought to our notice, again.
http://www.wftv.com/video/17714433/index.html
Snipped:
I have to say, I do not know what the agreement between Mason and Baez, but does everyone realize because this is a capital case, technically Mason is the lead counsel in this case?
B
I did not know the technicallity but knew, through logic, the truth of this matter.
Annals:
I am hopeless at linking anything, but I read about the penalty phase witness list and names on Websleuths. You can also find info. on Caylee Daily about this.
Blink,
( Jose and his respect for the law)
I know that you are really busy right now, however there is
a write up at the Caylee Daily that I thought was worth the read.
Wish you had extra hands to write us your thoughts because I
know that it would be one hell of a read!
hi cindeefromwisconsin
this is interesting read:
http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showpost.php?p=5928000&postcount=146
regarding baez former client sitting on death row.
did I post this part? if so sorry!
Defense lawyers Baez and Jonathan Kasen said they intend to attack the state’s case by assailing detective Dan Conlee for zeroing in too quickly on Diaz, by criticizing the work of a medical examiner and by accusing the young mother. They pointed an accusing finger Tuesday at the slain toddler’s mother, saying she had treated the 2-year-old like “an animal.”
———————————————————————————————————-
now he is representing a woman that treated her child like an animal. (casey)
he is doing this now:
In documents seeking a new trial and other post-conviction relief, Diaz says he lost his freedom because of Baez’s trial performance, strategy and failure to disclose evidence to prosecutors, a tactical decision that prevented jurors from viewing a defense video. Diaz said “…Mr. Baez wanted to surprise the prosecution, and the surprise blew up in the defense’s face.”
——————————————————————————————————
he will say this about casey in the end when she wants to appeal
as he did to this man sitting on death row.
Nilton Diaz, filed a motion for a new trial, claiming he was convicted due to the “defectiveness” of his defense attorney, Jose Baez.
Baez called it a common post-conviction strategy that often cites defense mistakes to win a new trial.
love this article
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/local/orange/os-jose-baez-outside-depth-20110107,0,6720421.story
Can José Baez rise to the challenge of Casey Anthony case?
By Anthony Colarossi, Orlando Sentinel
Had to snip Chica my dear friend, can only post a snippet and the link.
I have to say, that is one of the best articles on this case I have seen from a reporter to date. Well done.
B
annals wasnt that interesting to view?
I hadnt seen it either.
I see baez’s world starting to rollercoast downhill.
Thanks, Nora. I looked at the Caylee Daily and it’s source, The Orlando Sentinel. I look forward to seeing the full list. Since the list was released on Fri perhaps it will appear, in full, on Monday.
blink
thats ok and yeah thats the best article to date. I loved it!!!
TONIGHT ON 48 HRS
DISCOVERY CHANNEL @ 9:00
a repeat of the case.
Won’t all these articles and legal opinions about Baez’s incompetence help Casey eventually with an appeal that she didn’t have good council? I do admit to getting a kick out reading what most of us think – that the experts agree he’s not doing a great job. But I just worry that it will come up later in an appeal.
found this at the HM
its worth reading trust me.
..baez gets noticed on the Florida Bar daily newsletter:
http://www.floridabar.org/DIVCOM/PI/PIN … jose,baez*
—–jan.7 2011—-Lawyer Ethics/Legal Discipline—
http://www.floridabar.org/DIVCOM/PI/PIN … enDocument
—jan.4 2011—Criminal Justice Issues——-
Chica- I can post this one for you, it is .org, so the rules are a bit different, lol.
–Lawyer Ethics/Legal Discipline–
CASEY ANTHONY ATTORNEY JOSE BAEZ SLAPPED WITH FORMAL SANCTION, $538 BILL– Orlando Sentinel, http://www.orlandosentinel.com, Jan. 7, 2011.
Ninth Circuit Chief Judge Belvin Perry Thursday [Jan. 6] filed his written order hitting attorney Jose Baez with a sanction for a “willful violation” of an earlier court order to turn over expert witness discovery information to the prosecution. Baez will have to pay $583.73 in prosecutor’s “attorney’s fees” and provide written reports for all expert witnesses. Those reports must include “a complete statement of opinions the witnesses will express and the reasons for those opinions, and any data or other information considered by the witnesses in forming their opinions and conclusions.”
Now, since they list it under ethics/discipline, does that mean they might actually do something about it finally?
B
snipped elsewhere:
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2011 10:14 am
TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 15, 2009
Is the Answer Malignant Narcissism?
by Diane Fanning
http://womenincrimeink.blogspot.com/200 … ssism.html
sorry I left it out
Hi lowercase susan, your post gave me much to think about.
I don’t necessarily think that the articles or legal opinions will aid Casey in getting an appeal on the issue of Jose Baez’s incompetence. But- sometimes I feel the way you do but then I think to myself- they are only opinions.
Sure these writer’s ect, ask the questions- point out JB court room behavior, his immaturity, his hubris, but for the most part, they ask questions and give opinions. In other words, they are doing their jobs- and are giving the public, their readers, what they came for- their opinion on issues that matter to them. Will they matter in the greater scheme of things? IDK
IMO Judge Strickland did a mighty good thing when he brought Jose Baez’s alleged mishandling of DC to the board- HJS put a legitimate concern up for the board to rule on- and they ruled that there was insufficent reason to act. Judge Strickland, also did something else to ensure that Casey gets a far trial- He ruled that she must be present to oversee her team in action- she must be an active observer to her own defense, thereby safeguarding herself and the system, and in turn, Jose Baez.
Judge Strickland had also made other decisions which help to ensure there are no grounds for appeal- He asked Casey Anthony if she was satisfied with her council, he did this in open court, as the public was watching, and we all heard for ourselves, that Casey is satisfied with Jose Baez. Last, but not least, Honorable Judge Strickland recused himself from this court case, rather than give JB and the defense fodder to hold over the public’s eyes.
There have been several other complaints brought before the Florida Bar Grievance Committee, alleging unethical behavior ect. Dominic Casey alleged improper behavior ect IIRC and the issue of How JB and Casey funded her defense were also brought before the Bar. Each issue has been investigated and as Jose Baez himself stated-, “I have been cleared of all Bar complaints filed against me.”
IMO the State’s attorney’s themselves, continually go over and beyond in making sure that Casey Anthony’s rights are protected, they have several times brought up issues regarding what they feel should be done inorder to help ensure Casey gets a fair trial ect.
Honorable Judge Perry has also been doing his utmost to ensure Casey Anthony receives a proper defense and that she is guaranteed a fair trial. Last week, JP made sure that The defense team was well aware of a witness that alleges that Casey Anthony didn’t commit the crime of killing her daughter, and he made sure that the defense was well aware of the claim that this witness has evidence to back up his statements. Each time we watch a hearing in which HJP resides, it is obvious that he goes to great pains to make sure that JB and team have what they need and understand what they are doing ect.
Therefore, IMO many people have helped ensure Casey Anthony is getting an appropriate defense. Those that brought concerns to the Bar, did their part and had the concerns not been dealt with, the issues would be real cause for concern which may have led to bigger issues. The State, each Judge, and the Bar, did their part to ensure that Casey’s rights are protected and that she gets a fair trial.
HJPerry did not sanction the defense, IMO to punish him for his hubris, or to make The public or we bloggers happy- He did it to ensure that Casey Anthony gets a fair trial- He did it to ensure that JB plays by the rules laid out before him by law.
Judge Perry handed down a sanction for a ‘willful’ violation of his previous orders to share expert-witness discovery with the State, in order to ensure there is no “trial by ambush” -Thereby making sure that Casey Anthony gets a proper defense, and can not hide behind “mistakes” of her defense in appeals ect.
IMO HJP and the State will continue to work hard to make sure that Jose Baez does not get handed down a sanction that would result in the accused, Miss Casey Anthony, being denied the right to present certain witnesses or testimony ect. However, I think it is now obvious, that J Perry is no longer just warning the team. He is prepared to do whatever it takes to make sure JB & team play by the rules.
What it always comes back to, for me, is that Casey’s opinion has always been, from the start- and through-out, that she stands behind Jose Baez as her council.
IMO Jose Baez may be immature and he may be inexperienced, and completely full of himself, but I give credit where credit is due- Jose Baez has managed to defend Casey Anthony to the best of his ability. And his ability has been deemed just fine by his client.
Jose Baez has managed -( possibly through no action of his own), to get many fine legal minds on his dream team, working for his client, yes, some have since left, but they aided in Casey Anthony’s defense while they were there.. IMO, Casey Anthony is well protected- extremely well-defended. Here’s the thing- Jose Baez and his dream team are doing their jobs, but, it is an uphill battle.
I think Casey Anthony refuses to make it easy. I think she is now the one pulling the strings- and her defense team has its hands tied providing their client with the defense she dictates they must.
Casey Anthony is a woman that throughout her young adult life has never backed away from her lies. No matter if she is cornered, no matter if their is evidence of her guilt, no matter the consequences to herself, or her ‘loved-ones’
She sticks to her charade, come hell or high water.
If her parents couldnt get her to tell the truth, if her brother couldn’t get her to tell the truth and those detectives couldn’t… What makes anyone think that any member of her defense team can get her to back away from her lies- even if it means it will save her life?
Jose Baez & the rest of the team are doing the best with what they got- and everyone else is doing their best to ensure that the defense’s best, will be adequate for defending Casey Anthony- safe-guarding her right to a fair trial, by law. Despite what opinions I or anyone else may have, that is what matters.
Come what may- appeals or no appeals. As Honorable Judge Perry said in open court, he does not mind trying this case twice.- I would think that means appeals- or no appeals- sanctions or no sanctions- Whatever it takes. All JMO
Brilliant and Provoking Mom 3.0-
May I add:
Her DAUGHTER could not get her to tell the truth-
AND
Had THE FLORIDA BAR looked at this case, as you have just offered, they would realize that as the ethics police, they stand to be an “interested party” in an appellate situation. Wonder if that was a consideration for them before you pointed it out?
B
Wow- sorry for the length of my last post, guys- it didn’t look that long- when I hit submit-
Interesting comments Blink-
Sadly you are right, even seeing her baby daughter’s face did nothing to make Casey Anthony want to tell the truth.
I often wander if and when Casey will hit the end of the hall again, and offer up some little shred of truth- Will it only be after the case is tried and the jury is deliberating?- or will she get an Epiphany and tell some bit of truth earlier? Or has she said all she is going to say, in the way of truth, and she will let it all play out- no matter the consequences, nomatter how much evidence is against her, forcing the jury to make the ultimate decision -sending her to death? Thereby, Never taking one shred of responsibility for anything, and continuing her family’s suffering long after she is dead?
As for the Florida Bar- I don’t know what to think- they must need a whole lot in terms of evidence inorder to find an attorney at fault.
Regardless, The Bar’s findings is what allowed Jose Baez to continue to act as Casey’s attorney.
I would think that the Bar followed the rule of law each time- inorder to protect all involved in this case, including those that brought the issues to them, and themselves, not to mention Jose Baez and Casey Anthony. If not, as you pointed out, there is going to be alot of explaining to do later… JMO
PS-thanks for allowing me to adopt your descriptive word- “hubris” it is very appropriate.
Mom3.0 – brilliant! helps me so much as it answers all my fears and questions that I am loathe to post for fear of looking legally uneducated. Thank you Blink, Mom3, Sister, Kleat, Chica etc. for the time and effort you put into this site, I truly appreciate it. I don’t always find the links so please continue to point the way for us slow coaches. I was fascinated watching HJP at work, he restored my faith in the justice system. I just don’t understand Mr Mason’s attitude. I consider him rude, disrespectful and at times, plain ‘cranky’. His presence seems to be more of a hinderence than a benefit, he is all over the place with his paperwork and full marks to the Prosecution, they have been patient and polite in the extreme, their pure profesionalism glaringly obvious by comparison.
Mom3.0
Thank you, I enjoy your post very much.
momof3
great post! let’s hope the bar takes action in spite of their lack of~
Blink
does sound like thats what it means. I think the ethics comittee is gonna finaly take action!!
toes/fingers and eyes crossed here in hopes.
Hi Chelsea
thanks we all contribute what we can to keep the spirit of caylee alive and the bells of justice to ring loud and clear.
momof3
your post was long but very right on great post! I enjoyed reading every word of it. It was well said and came across very insightful.
thanks
Love BOC
We have been here for the duration and have gotten to know eachother! we have shared so many roller coaster rides with this ill prepared defense.
This might sound dumb! but I didn’t know the meaning of Hubris. I looked it up and here it is for those like me that arent sure.
Overbearing pride or presumption; arrogance:
Mom3.0, thank you for your impressive reply. That was a great post. And Blink’s addition to it, too!
ok I snipped this from THMHas anyone seen this before? it’s regarding the anthonys foundation.
http://www.taxexemptworld.com/organization.asp?tn=1716246
Yes, this is is their third go-around. The first was illegal and shut down, we produced a 90 page report on it, the second the IRS kicked back because their statement of purpose was too broad.
It is a charitable foundation, anyone that has contributed has the right to request a report.
B
chelsea, good points (and you too Mom). I don’t think the glaring opposites of professionalsim will be lost on the jury. bozo’s attitude, mason jar’s fumbling and bumbling, will not be lost on them either.
http://www.wftv.com/video/17714433/index.html
thank you for posting this I have never seen this, what more am I missing I thought I had seen everything…thanks again
5.annals says:
January 9, 2011 at 12:47 pm
Ask yourself this question….
How much of a chuckle do you think both CJ Perry and His Honor Stan Strickland got imagining the faces of THE BAEZ LAW FIRM when they learned who would preside after Strickland’s recusal?
B
Blink I have a question, I don’t understand how asking Casey Anthony a High School Drop Out, if she is happy with her defense team, her answer being yes, holds water, I don’t understand how come Baez has not been removed by a higher more educated power that recognizes the injustice he is doing to her and her case, please help me understand because I am confused as all get out…how does this process work, I believe she deserves a fair trial as do all, and this circus act has my head spinning circles…..anyone please educate me on this process….Thanks in advance!
She is the client, she is an adult, she has zealous representation that complies on the surface with The Florida Bar.
B
Thanks everyone for your kind feedback on my essay.
Chelsea- I am glad that I could help.
You guys are all so nice. I spent some time rereading my essay, laughing at myself and my typos ect- Despite what I wrote, I do not think the Honorable Judge Perry lives (resides) inside the courtroom in which he PRESIDES. Me, brilliant? Right… ha Ha
Thanks for over-looking my mistakes guys.
Adding a link to a news clip that goes over Casey’s reaction to Caylee’s remains being found- and goes over a statement by Casey (pp): that regardless if they (LE) have a bucket load of evidence downstairs or just speculation or nothing at all- she knows that Caylee is alive ect-
Casey while waiting for JB to arrive, says that she is willing to speak to the detectives willingly, inorder to help them in their investigation – of course Casey thinks better of it and has JB say she will not speak further, and wishes to be transported to jail.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uyb3LPwEROw
Who is pulling the strings? In hindsight, Casey seems to get po-ed when the detective tells her they have more than speculation alot more- she seems to rethink her willingness to be ‘forthcoming’ at that point- (How dare he not accept her motherly feelings as gospel) She emphatically answers ‘yes’ to Jose’s question of (pp) Do you want to go in another room and speak to me?…. then when they return JB seems flustered as he states that Casey has now changed her mind.
All JMO
I guess it is all in how you look at it- I wonder how the jury will see things?-
thanks blink:)
The Caylee Daily just posted that the Defense has asked for Reconsideration of Sanctions……I hope that the judge sticks to his guns and makes JB pay for his lack of consideration for the Law…..
I knew baez would throw a fit and it’s partly because the florida bar’s newsletter exposed him for the sanctions so he is firing back. Mason is the one that did the latest motion for him. We all know baez has no language etiquette or style.
Snipped: A hearing in the case is scheduled for Friday. WESH.com will provide live coverage.
Read more:
http://www.wesh.com/r/26454604/detail.html
Relevant snippet from Dr. G’s autopsy report:
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/7494800/Aut … ee-Anthony
”Examination of the skull reveals no evidence of antemortem trauma. The inner aspect of the cranial cavity is examined with light and reveals sandy dirt and an attached small incisor which is adhered to the inside of the calvarium with dirt.”
so bozo is trying to get one of his experts to say there was mud in the skull and dr. g didnt discover it!!
OH friday’s hearing will be a smackdown I predict.
Major Hubris explosion with baez!!!!
Blink, I know you are up to beyond your eyeballs . . . but I am holding my breath waiting for your comment on the Reconsideration of Sanctions Motion.
For someone who did not want to be sanctioned (Mason), it is my belief he is walking on thin ice. How does bozo get Mason to do this for him? I don’t think momster is the only one who has fallen down in the elevator. The duhfense is stuck between floors.
O sister, that is a beauty. Check out Mom 3.0 getting her snark on, I love it.
B
Mom 3.0 Great Post above, it was long, but worth the time to take to read!
I personally think that one of the reason’s Casey is SO happy with Baez is the rumor of a “close” relationship at the beginning of the case, when she was out on bail and spent everyday/allday in/at his office. I think there is a closer connection in her mind that reg attorney/client. JMO, And as I stated this was just a rumor, not fact.
thanks lady Blink, I understand…appreciate it, keep pushing sister, I have been quiet because I want to behave but I havent forgoten you still here lurking about….
I LMAO wondering the same Blink…..I had no idea he was the first to smack the hammer hpe he follows suit again!
Blink,
Thanks so much for everything you do with this story and the many others that you are involved in. But I have a question if you could please weigh in on. Do you think with the latest motion asking for a Reconsideration of Sanctions is CM & JB trying to JUDGE SHOP in hopes of getting HHJP to step aside.
http://www.wftv.com/news/26455776/detail.html
Casey’s Attorney Files Motion Fighting Sanctions
Snipped-
Mason filed a 12-page motion Tuesday asking the judge to reconsider his decision to fine Jose Baez.
Sheaffer says Casey’s attorneys just need to focus on her defense. Sheaffer said a lot of manpower went into Tuesday’s motion, which asks Chief Judge Belvin Perry to reconsider a ruling he already made”
link to motions and video report included at WFTV
—-
Well, it seems the shared hubris effect strikes again Blink. Cheney Mason is the person on the defense that seems to be the most bothered by the Sanctions being handed down for Baez. He of course, being the attorney that has the most to lose regarding his reputation ect. Mr. Mason wrote a twelve page motion.
Here is a summary: (not really of course I am joking- parody and all that)
Dear Honorable Judge Perry- Pretty please reconsider. You see, we, the defense, do not know what our defense /strategy is going to be- we are trying our best- but we are forced to provide the best defense to our client, Miss Casey Anthony- who still clings to the assertion that she is innocent of any and all wrong-doing in the matter of her 2 year-old daughter’s, ‘disappearance’ and homicide, despite any and all evidence to the contrary… As you know, Jose and the team have floated many many err… ideas ect of why our client is innocent, and even who else may have done this- Not one has resonated with the public…
Please, your honor, reconsider these Sanctions, I am at my wits end in trying to protect my law career, I am embarrassed and I am unwilling to accept that Jose B. Good Esquire and his hubris has now tarnished my reputation. I assure you, that we have provided The State with everything we have, the problem is what we’ve got well… it ain’t much.
Let me demonstrate :- Our experts are willing to testify- to something…(but only if they really have to…) One of experts, performed the autopsy, well…he is umm willing to say … essentially, that the remains were placed on the left side-as shown by the debris inside the skull- well as you know, the skull was found upright- So we really hope that can only mean that someone besides our client placed the body there. Thereby proving The State’s expert must have mistakenly wrote about the debris and the tooth. The expert didn’t even open the skull- Hence, that must prove that the State’s expert has to be wrong in stating that the body was placed at the site before complete skeletonization, and was moved by scavenger animals and water levels ect.
I hope you understand my frustration err uh.. I mean our position now your honor, you must have misunderstood before, perhaps misread, we are all trying our very best….really-. I hope you will give us another chance … I really do… the last thing we need is sanctions… Oh My reputation…. this is definitely NOT fun…
Ps Jose wants me to add that he is doing the best he can, considering he is now getting paid below minimum wage- I gotta go now. He is screaming- over and over *I want my three dollars* I want my three dollars*
OMG!! momof3 too funny! we need some humor to make it with these idiots. I am so speechless that mason would rant like that!! the sanction didnt affect his record just his his colleague right????
unbelievable their actions.
ok blink please!!
whats your prediction for fridays hearing???
I will get to that Chica, I promise.
B
oh yes terrys comment made me rmember what I wanted to ask blink and blinkettes??
can mason and baez recuse get rid of this judge too????
DEEE HUGS MY FRIEND GOOD TO SEE YOU HERE!!! TALK TO U LATER ON YAHOO CHAT:)