Caylee/Casey Anthony Case: Halt Your Hubristic Hubrishness Jose Baez.. We Are All Stocked Up Here
Disclaimer– exclusive original content copyright and property of Internet Network News, LLC and Blinkoncrime.com. Reproduction of this article , ANY OF IT’S Theories, Conclusions, comments or CONTENT, in whole or in part, without proper attribution and source link is strictly prohibited without prior written permission.
“He has lulled himself into a false sense of competence.”
Hold The Hubris Pass The Humility
The saga begins as follows:
Aging local *legend in his own mind* defense attorney gets “defendant envy” when he sees the dude he thought was the busboy at all The Florida Bar functions, making more on his first big case, with more media face time, than Or lawn do has ever seen. Seasoned barrister signs on for his professional *see alice*, if you will.
Wait, kidding, not the saga in question, my bad.
Yesterday, on behalf of Casey Anthony, lead counsel with Jose Baez, J. Cheney Mason put to “motion” what undoubtedly was screaming inside his head as Mr. Baez bumbled, err, argued, against the States motion for contempt and sanctions last week. The reconsideration request drafted by Attorney Mason will undoubtedly come as a surprise to Judge Perry. When his Honor asked Mason why the deadline was not met at the State’s hearing:
..”Was there any particular reason that was not complied with?..”
Mason replied, “The answer to that is I don’t know.”
Mr. Baez was found in contempt and fined less than the cost of his ipad.
I am not an attorney, but I do know that you cannot introduce new and different bullsh*it you neglected to bore the court with previously AND when you had the opportunity to respond and argue with a new tie and pocketsquare ensemble.
Apparently Judge Perry was not swayed by Baez “.. They say they will call but they never do..” argument, insinuating all Jeff Ashton had to do was call him to work out what his other previous 4 email requests could not.
Makes sense to me now that he put it like that, right?
Everyone knows you can trust what a defense attorney says on the phone who will not commit same information to writing. Duh.
Damn this traffic jam how I hate to be late.. It hurts my motor to go so slow..
I have this vision of Atty Slabaugh driving down the 4 with the top down and the 300 pages he threw in the back “loose”, are flying all over the freeway behind him. So that’s the problem.. the dang clerk’s office refusing to tie up their fax, dedicate 2 folks to replace toner and paper in the middle of the 300 page and 5 hour late response, while jamming every other case and function, for Casey Anthony. Missed the memo as well, I presume.
How insensitive. First word folks.. flash-drive. Second word.. GARMIN. It does not take 5 hours to get from Kissimme to Orlando, and that’s assuming he left when the filing was already past deadline.
Moving on to the defense’s whine list:
My fave- Dr. Lee found 17 hairs in a car that is believed to have transported the victim in this instant capital murder case and therefore he should not be expected to testify about it.
BBBBBBBBAAAAAHHHHHHHAAAAAA. Seriously?
To date, this is absolutely the most laughable attempt to publicly excuse a witness who Mr. Baez apparently does not consider important enough to pay his dang expenses out of pocket for.
I hear this in my head:
Dr. Lee is not going to be called to testify OR be available for a deposition, cause, like, maybe the harsh weather will not produce that case of luscious oranges, but we are not sure yet, so please wait while we ask the plant lady, who will of course be testifying about plants, but you knew that already. Please tell me you knew that already.
Not to be confused with p-l-a-n-t-i-n-g, as we plan to move to strike or suppress any appearance of the words ” Dr. Henry Lee” and the word “planting” that appear on the same page of any document or media article, as well as within the silent thoughts of any of them-there bloggin’ types.
Lest we forget, Mr. Lee, who will not be testifying anyway if his expenses are not going to be paid, was denied access to an active homicide recovery scene while CST’s were still removing the tiny bones of Caylee Anthony from her swamp tomb.. the nerve of OCSO.
I mean, who knows what Dr. Lee could have come up with in that cornucopia of specimens.
Maybe even Kronk’s Oscar Meyer weenie whistle from the third grade perhaps.
Apparently the defense team , while discussing the virtues of Jose Hubris’s new “do”, missed the free lesson on the actual designation of the Crime Scene Technician, or CST, as mentioned by Jeff Ashton as opposed to the continued reference to “CSI” in defense motions.
Freeman is Freed
Dr. Michael Freeman, who up until last forever was working on his reports for the defense, will not be testifying, although he has not been removed from the defense witness list by presstime.
In an earlier blinkoncrime.com article, I opined about Dr. Freeman’s potential contribution to the case as it relates to a possible death by natural causes. In Judge Perry’s contempt order, it is clear that any expert witness whose opinions or conclusions are not part of discovery, will be excluded from the trial testimony by the defense.
Note- no reporting, no conclusions, no discovery from Dr. Freeman, an expert witness listed in a two year old case. Draw your own conclusions, or, maybe the incident in Washington where an individual with the same name and age helped himself to an Army cell phone that did not belong to him at a Federal facility is “of concern”.
A hearing is scheduled this Friday January 14 to hear the matter.
Late this morning a Judicial Assistant from Chief Judge Perry’s Chambers, speaking from a microphone at the defense table he turned on and off by himself, read aloud to Blink, Editor In Chief blinkoncrime.com, the order he is to prepare for Friday, as dictated to him by my Judge Perry daydream-thought-bubble this afternoon:
Mr. Mason, what you’ve just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul*.
Full disclosure: Maybe without his reading glasses Cheney Mason thought he was penning a request for a vacation, not a request to vacate.. In which case, who could blame the man? I say grant it without prejudice or reservations.
JP Image by Klaasend
*Y’all know that quote is from Billy Madison
.
Related Posts
Related Posts:
526 Comments
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
momof3
thanks for keeping us alll informed and updated. Lately I have been pulled in many directions! today the wind blew me here to check in on updates. thanks for your great updates.
PigletinCT
hiya
just checking in to see whats up whats new with all of you. I want to make sure all my friends dont forget me!
to all of my friends here a hearty shout out! I am still alive and kicking! sometimes slower!! geritol to the rescue and calgon take me away!!
till next time
chica
Mom3.0….thank you for the updates and links! You are a team player to the max. <3
Chica – hi, glad you blew in to check on us all, missed you. This is my second home, I am so fearful of missing something I check in daily. Whilst waiting for May to come round, I have been reading up on Judge Perry. The triumph Baez felt when Judge Strickland stepped down must since have turned to ashes in his mouth. HJP is my idea of how a Judge should behave; patient, learned, thoughtful, considered, fair in the extreme. The defense will never have cause to cry foul play. IMO
rag doll,chica & all,
Thanks-& you’re welcome- Seriously if I didn’t come here to add things I would be driving my family nuts with more ‘new’ happenings in this case. So I am just glad to have BOC to channel my thoughts/opinions & endless links.
Blink you wrote IRT Lee leaving:
I promise you, this is a bigger mess than an un-delivered crate of oranges.
Out on the limb here- Dr. Lee will testify in this trial in some capacity if there is no plea.
B
—I always appreciate you sharing your thoughts. Especially since so many of your opinions have turned out to be true later on- limb or no limb. As far as I can tell Dr. Lee has not been dropped from the defense’s witness list yet. So, I don’t think it is official- Saying that Lee writing a report/turning it over now, would be moot is not official documentation for court is it?
Your thoughts make me wonder even more- What is the defense team’s strategy? Plea no plea- claim of accidental death- unlawful burial, as you once opined…What? Their expert list is getting mighty low on experts.
All JMO
I have a question? I thought that I heard HHJP say that he expected the Jury to be selected in a weeks time…..How are the Blinkettes feeling about this….I mean sure hope that it happens but everything you read says that it can take weeks……I sure hope the trial starts on May 9th 2011….
Hi Blink, et al. Just lurking. Not much to say but wanted to stop by to say hello.
)
~twink
There she is, nice to see you
B
this is the place to come and read up on new happenings!! were all here for justice and it seems like were headed in the right direction. I just hope that the judge doesnt give bozo 45 days more!! its been long enough!1 lets get it on !! bring on the justice that caylee deserves!!
its time for casey to move to her new home for life!!
Hi terry. I believe HJP said that jury selection wouldnt take more than two weeks= others said probably more. I don’t know if the trial will be in May, or not, but HJP is trying his hardest to ensure that everything takes off without a hitch. PS I believe May 9th is the beginning of jury selection… I could be mistaken ….not sure.
Thanks Mom3.0 I do believe that HJP is trying his hardest I just wonder how much control he will have over the whining and dis approving of potential Jurors. I am sure that mumbles & fumbles will whine and drag there feet in an effort to prolong the trail.
I get the impression that the D-Team FBI Profiles and questioners on all potential jurors in the surrounding counties (lol)
Hi Blink, I seldom write but keep up with you and the bloggers on this site, I have to say the information given on this site is just so fascinating, nothing you could get from the news. I keep seeing Cindy and Jose and the cowboy hat guy saying “when it all comes out, everyone is going to be amazed” probably not correct word for word, after all it’s been such a long process and so far nothing but their lies have been amazing. Thanks for providing such a great space to honor sweet Caylee.
Re: janetoo says:
January 27, 2011 at 8:32 am
Yes, I had forgotten that and we can add Todd Macaluso and Linda Kenney-Baden to the list of folks having made similar statements.
I am wondering what’s happening with Dorothy Clay Sims’ involvment with the defense team. If she doesn’t appear at the Frye hearings, I’ll suspect she’s changed her mind about being a member of the dream team.
http://articles.cnn.com/2010-09-14/justice/casey.anthony.new.attorneys_1_prominent-orlando-attorney-casey-anthony-defense-team?_s=PM:CRIME
Terry, I agree the Defense seems to want to stretch out the time to actual trial. If I understood HJP correctly, he already rented/put a hold on the rooms for the potential jurors, during the selection process. So, I am not sure how that will effect the may date.
Jose Baez recently notified the court that he needs/wants time off…I week I believe, in March.
It must be for something really important, because I don’t see how JB can have the audacity to even make such a request, when He and his team seem so far behind in following through with jobs /work ect. Work that IMO should have been finished at a much earlier time. My goodness they haven’t even deposed Amy yet.
All JMO
BTW There will be another document dump tomorrow. According to WESh- This info will be IRT the investigation surrounding Casey’s jail letters to Cookie and some will be on TES.
Here is an article that I found going into further detail about Work to be done- and JB asking for time off ect also mentions that tomorrow’s doc dump might have to do with TES and LB:
http://sprocket-trials.blogspot.com/
Casey Anthony’s Defense Asks For Delay
snipped-
Casey Anthony’s Defense Asks For Delay
January 26 was the deadline for Jose Baez and his fellow defense team members to file all the expert reports ordered under sanction by Judge Belvin Perry.
Foolish me, I expected that Mr. Baez would have gotten the message Judge Perry sent and get the long over-due reports in. It didn’t happen. Instead, Baez filed a Motion For Extension Of Time To Comply With Order For Expert Witness Reports! Later the same day, he filed a Notice of Unavailability for February 21-25.
sorry about getting the dates wrong – I wrote March but JB asked for Feb 21-25
checking in to say hello to all my buddies! trying to keep positive about this case results. now I hear baez is going to take 45 days off how can the judge allow it? this is so irresponsible.
Mom3.0 I can’t remember where I read it but I read that the week Jose was asking off was the same week that A Forensic Conferences that Dr. Lee and 3 other of his experts will be at…….the loggers were speculating that the 45 days and the unnavigable week that Jose requested is for a big Pow on what to put in the reports.
maybe he is going von voyage to poli vu france’ again? who knows.
Hi Mom3.0.
When Judge Perry mentioned the non-refundable hotel deposit/reservation, I took him to mean in the Orlando area for the trial. A warning to the attorneys that jury selection needs to start & conclude on time.
Me too, I am actually surprised that Mr Baez has asked for more time to get some of the expert reports; silly me. He’s asking for an additional 45 days. One of the delayed reports is from Dr Kathy Reichs, forensic anthropolgist; wasn’t she brought aboard Ship Casey in early 2009? Gosh, that’s 2 years ago.
Here’s another one from the Motion for Extension of Time:
j. The undersigned has made multipal attempts to reach Dr Barry Logan. The defense fully anticipates being able to comply with the court’s order prior to his deposition. Dr Logan is a nationally recognized chemist and the defense believes that his schedule is simply the issue as Dr Logan has been available previously to the defense.
—————
When someone hasn’t responded to multipal attempts to reach them over the course of 2&1/2 weeks, is it reasonable to conclude that they are still available to the defense?
Another GOOD FAITH effort from Jose Baez.
http://www.wesh.com/pdf/26611795/detail.html
For real this guy?
B
Annals, you are right, author and bones collector, Kathy Reichs has been on the case a longggg time– but she actually flew in from Montreal to view the crime scene immediately that some unidentified small child’s remains were found. She made her comments on the tv screen, complained how she had never faced this kind of restriction to a crime scene in her past expert witness experience, not that she has been called as expert in many cases.
She’s off to New Zealand, so the state attorneys will just have to wait until she’s good and ready to comply with the court order– not HER fault!
lol, she will be in Chicago in February, maybe they could shedule her at the Hyatt
B
Annals, here’s Kathy Reichs talking on CBC about the case Dec. 15, 2008. Caylee’s remains has not been identified at the time of this interview– ‘we are getting… no access to the remains or the scene itself’. Reichs wastes no time to complain on behalf of Casey about access to remains yet she doesn’t make herself available to write up (or print out) her notes into report form as required by law.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lbQqu6inX84
RE: chica says:
January 27, 2011 at 9:47 pm
maybe he is going von voyage to poli vu france’ again? who knows.
————-
Hi Chica, there appears to be a clue to what Jose Baez might be doing the week of Feb 21 et c’est pas Francais. It’s in the Trials & Tribulations (Sprocket-Trials) link provided by Mom 3.0. I’ll link it again at the bottom. If you visit the link, scroll down quite a way to the Anthony Defense article.
Snipped: [refering to the Motion for Extended Time]
The kicker here is that Baez tells the court that he will have a “unique opportunity” to meet with, “Reichs and Rodriguez prior to them rendering their opinions as they may have additional opinions after review of additional material.”
Could it be that Mr. Baez has asked for 45 days [extension] so that he can travel to Chicago where these two experts will be attending the Forensic Sciences Annual Meeting?
http://sprocket-trials.blogspot.com/
————————
The Frornsic Sciences Annual Meeting will be held Feb 21-26. In his notice of unavailability, Mr Baez has asked the Court that no meetings, appointments, mediations, depositions, conferences, hearings or other legal proceedings be scheduled during Feb 21-25. That Sprocket-Trials article is a good read, there’s more. (Thanks for that Mom 3.)
Terry that’s interesting- according to the link from my last post, JB says (pp) he hasn’t had a chance to meet with his experts in awhile but hopes to soon…I wonder if he hopes to meet up with some at the conference?
Hi annals- thanks for that info- another 45 days- it will be almost trial time- and the State will have already conducted depos right? If the Defense still has no understanding of what their experts will testify to, and they still are unable to provide reports.. How will another 45 days help? Seems like alot of extra time to run around and hope to get something accomplished…JMO
Todays doc release: I have been jumping from WESH to WFTV ect this seems to have the highest # so far…
http://www.cfnews13.com/article/news/2011/january/201525/New-Casey-Anthony-documents-released-Friday
Snipped-
News 13 received a large amount of documents in the Case against Casey Friday, including a number of Texas EquuSearch interviews.
The State Attorney’s office has handed over three discs full of new information in their case. One disc is full of photos, another disc is audio interviews investigators conducted sometime last year.
I haven’t had a chance to look through it, much at all- but I did notice that pics were released of Casey’s diary supposedly from 2003- investigators found out the company that manufacturer’s the diary did not start doing that until 2004?- (perhaps the diary was a late xmas present?) Because the lab found impressions from the torn out first pages which left a mark on the previous page- they could read some of the words and Casey talked about Christmas and possibly dating or liking a Kenneth and a Marcus…. the lab went on to say they could not determine exactly when the entries were written- but could narrow it down even more if they had the pen that was used.
BTW- I did look over some of the LB stuff- yikes it seems she has gotten herself into alot of hot water…Back to reading..
just wanted to add a link to WESH’s coverage of Documents released today- they seem to be updating more frequently… & have it broken down nicely IMO-
http://livewire.wesh.com/Event/Evidence_Released_In_Case_Against_Casey_Anthony
Cindy’s letters- I know many will not think so but- to me, they are sad to read- She still seems to cling to the notion that Casey is not allowed to write her…and her mention of Lee being right when he said that LE would work to isolate Casey and nothing would be private…as if it is a conspiracy against her daughter and not jail policy ect, is too much.
I was happy to read that Cindy’s father is doing okay and recently just had his birthday. Cindy wrote of her belief that Caylee breathed life back into him on her last visit FD 08..? that was difficult to read.Jmo
Cindy also mentioned Casey’s grandma GP, understanding why Casey was growing her hair long…that she knew Casey’s heart…not sure what that meant, but it seems Cindy & GP think it has a deeper meaning then what we are privy to. Cindy also mentioned George going to counseling w/her. I hope they will receive help and peace.
I can understand Cindy’s frustration in not liking Casey’s letters being part of discovery. I just wish she/they would understand that it all wouldn’t be such a big deal if they, from the beginning decided to meet and visit and write one another. All they have accomplished, IMO with Casey’s refusal to visit or write, is greater attention brought to every word written, every glance given ect. That, and the belief that they are all corresponding secretly through JB gets people angry and draws attention (negatively) toward them. It certainly does not make Casey look good to continue to not write and not visit ect. It makes Casey seem even more cold and indifferent.
All JMO
so my friends!
the diary entry wasnt 03
well aint that just dandy as candy that they thought changing the date would be handy!!
the truth is coming out and makes you wonder how much more the info the state has!! maybe the time off baez is taking off is to re-strategize cuz he knows its all downhill fer he and his client.
p.s
no more office ronde’vu’s for them or whateva they called those long hrs they spent alone in his office.
justice for caylee.
Good to see you Chica, Mom3.0…everyone
)
Can this ‘request to delay’submission of expert reports by the defense be considered non compliant? The request was, as always, just before the dead line. I’m sure it was all in good faith.
I hear an echo’
Hi Blink I have 2 posts still in moderation…. just checking up on them-
I also did a Google search of Casey Anthony with the names Kenneth and Marcus. IRT the new Diary page investigation- missing pages with imprint that read:
together and
our relationship has now taken
a different course, however, not
hing has changed. Of course
I like him, I’m just scared
that this isn’t the best for me.
my I’m
but it’s best right now
XXXXXXX and it’s
something for me for now. I feel
a lot better about my decision
now that Kenneth and I worked
things out
Marcus has been nothing
short of perfect the past few
days. He’s known just how to
cheer me up. He is definitely
a great guy and potential
boyfriend material. I’m glad
that I am getting
It seems there is a K that went to COl HS and is now on the Penalty Phase witness list and there is a mention of a Marcus in one of Casey Anthony’s previous MYSpace correspondences…
I thought I remembered a Marcus being listed in Casey’s phone contacts, but I guess I was mistaken, as I can’t find references to it now…
Here is the Googled info FWIW, I don’t know if these two people mentioned have anything to do with Casey’s missing Diary page/s impressions or not- I just thought it was interesting:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1…t?hl=en&pli=1#
Snipped:
Kenneth D rupiewski- Winter Park, FL – added Nov 29, 2010
Grad Colonial HS 2003 – Casey dated Kenneth in HS before Casey dated Jesse G
- Friend of Dante Salari and Annie Downing
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1…t?hl=en&pli=1#
http://websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?t=73318&page=2
post #34
snipped:
More posts from Squishy23′s MySpace page, sent to her from KC:
Caylee is missing:
Dec 5, 2007 9:12 PM
you may have me by a few years, but caylee is already 2, going on 2 & 1/2…yeah, i feel old! haha.
all moms go through it.
can’t wait to see you guys!!! is there anything she needs?
i miss buying smaller clothes
cays was doing the same, by her first birthday, with christmas around the corner. they grow up terribly fast!
tell *marcus* i said hello.
i miss you love!
I was listening to Part 2 of the interview with Robin Adams Casey’s pen pal. Robyn said that her and Casey spoke to each other face to face. When the officer asked her to clarify how that happened Robyn said she wasn’t ready to answer that question. Then the tape froze up on me. So, Blink do you know how these two were able to speak face to face?
Hi all… just finished reviewing Cindy’s interview(s) w/detectives early on. I’m amazed at her confidence and lack of true emotional control for Caylees behalf.
WoW! Baby girl… As much as we’ll miss not seeing you grow up. We know in our hearts that you are in a better place had this had to be, than to continue to endure the lack of respect this family showed to one another, even you… so close to three years old.
I’m sorry.
cindeefromwisconsin, Hi- – Robyn finally tells the officers that she was eventually allowed into Casey’s jail cell- IIRC once- for the entire night. She says that she at first, only spoke to Casey thru hand gestures thru the glass- then thru letters left in a book- then she would ask to move closer to Casey’s window inorder to understand her better, and would talk with her through the hole in the door- then finally was allowed into her cell ect..
In short
Robyn befriended one of the guards and the guard eventually over-looked/allowed it….
What I found interesting is that Robyn believes that Casey is not the same person that others knew before she was sent to jail-she thinks Casey has been humbled. How?- She never once showed remorse, or repented, her letters to Robyn are filled with joy of the future & hardly any thoughts of Caylee-the letters are filled w/hatred for her family & IMO lies upon lies- How is she humbled? (pp) The officer asks Robyn if she believes Casey is a manipulator..Robyn answers: she is very charming…The officer says do you think she manipulated you?— To which Robyn doesn’t seem to give a clear answer…
Robyn went out of her way to write a letter to Casey’s mom. In it she says (pp) she told Cindy that she needs to stand by her daughter, that she was in pain, and that Casey needs her… she says she showed the letter to Casey before she sent it…
Well IMO Casey sold her a heaping helping of “poor me”- My mom would rather be on talk shows than come to my hearings… my brother molested me, I caught him by my bed with a flash light one night…he sleep walks- My dad’s letter’s are distant…I dreamed my Dad was in my childhood bedroom last night….
So yeah, I think Casey Anthony manipulated Robyn, but at the same time I believe Robyn manipulated Casey into wanting to share “her boys” & I believe they both manipulated the guard and I believe Robyn tried to manipulate her situation by holding on to Casey’s letters, and writing Cindy (trying for a response & to gain Casey’s trust) all in the hopes of some sort of positive action in her own court case or in her pockets…
Did some of it have to do with loneliness, and wanting friendship, sure, I’ll buy that, but it wasn’t all done for human companionship. Does that make Robyn a bad person? No, I don’t think so, but She isn’t a saint. Does that make the guard a bad person? No, but it makes her bad at her job of being a guard. Does it make Casey a bad person, no, but I am sure Casey got what she needed out of it, the same as Robyn…or they tried to…
All just my own opinion.
Do I feel sorry for Robyn? Yes. Do I feel sorry for the guard? Yes. Do I feel sorry for Casey? Yes. But it doesn’t change the facts, does it?
My apologies, I am having a few SQL issues on top of having to move my hardware and blah blah.
Thank you as usual for keeping us informed.
B
Hi Blink – Great piece, ROFLMAO, perhaps your best to date! I keep reading it again for the giggles. Well done as always.
momof3
thanks for adding the info you googled you are amazing my friend.
cindeefromwisconsin hiya
I listened to sylvia hernandez internal affairs interview last night! she clearly was contradicting herself all over the place. She clearly knew she violated jail policy and proceedures. She stated she didnt know it was wrong to have derovitch write her from state prison she even gave the inmate her home adress and talked about how she and (inmates D)family would someday do a get together!!
she told LE one thing and the internal affairs a different story! only an idiot would jeopordize a god job in these hard pressed economy times we are in.
kinda reminds me baez stating he didnt know (inmate D) and his jail conversation was recorded.
where are their scruples and professionel boundaries!
I am glad that the officer was releived of her duties! unbelievable that she would put herself and others at risk for the friendship of a few criminals. Makes me wonder what the officers background is! never mind I can assume it’s a ghetto uneducated mentality as well as with baez!! they may be book smart but lack in common sense smart.
justice for caylee.
I havent worked myself into listening to robins yet! I will make an attempt this evening!
Chica- hi. I agree with about SH dodginess. The same with Robyn IMO.
I don’t know what SH was thinking. But I do know that there are alot of lonely people in this world. Everyone seeks friendship. My opinion is that SH let down her guard-literally- because of Robyn’s ability to connect to her and befriend her-
Having said all this, SH was in a situation of trust and control over these prisoners. She made the decision to go against policy, putting herself in danger, her job, and the prisoners. I agree that she had no business circumventing the rules for any reason.
It would be like a male guard saying he fell in love with a woman prisoner and therefore broke the rules “for love” everyone wants to be loved- but That would be a huge no no rape infact- So whether or not SH did it for friendship or not, She was clearly Wrong and breaking the rules and therefore deserved to be reprimanded/fired ect.
I think SH got played. But regardless she was in the wrong.
All JMO
I promise you, this is a bigger mess than an un-delivered crate of oranges.
Out on the limb here- Dr. Lee will testify in this trial in some capacity if there is no plea.
B
I don’t understand how Dr. Lee could be called to testify if his report is not turned over to the prosecution. Isn’t that what JP ruled? Can Baez play this type of game just to keep the SA confused and them abush at trial? I think I’m the one who’s confused. Can anyone explain. TIA
No problem Blink- I just thought I had finally met my quota of posts-LOL
Nice to know I haven’t …yet.
The Diary and the missing pages-
I don’t know if the June 21st entry was Caylee related- or specifically to that year or 2008 or not- but I find it very interesting that pages were torn from it- and that LE took the time to have the secret service investigate it so thoroughly.
The latest Doc dump reminded me of the newspaper clippings ect- that LE found in the attic in one of their searches- I wonder if they found the missing pages and if they were torn out because they spoke of who Caylee’s father was or other info that Cindy may not have wanted public-
In searching for journal related topics I came across this media clip from July 21 2008-
It shows Cindy speaking after a Caylee vigil-
She is talking about Casey being a writer, (according to the reporter) and goes on to ask any of Casey’s friends to come forward and supply her with Casey’s thoughts so that she can begin to piece them together for clues to what might have happened to Caylee…)
Is she saying that she believes Casey gave her friends pages of her writings? Possibly even journal pages/ (as the reporter mentions that Cindy has recently started going through Casey’s journals *plural* for clues)I am not sure, as I unfortunately was unable to find a full clip of Cindy’s comments…
Did anyone see the original clip in full? Does anyone know whether or not she was asking friends for things that Casey wrote or just tips? TIA
Here’s the clip/s:
This one is the full clip-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fld9Q0PgCss
this one is from WFTV- but has been cut down or does not play all the way for me;
http://www.wftv.com/video/16940687/index.html
Oh my gosh, I just wasted way too much time reading the Laura Buchanan transcripts. I’ll be shocked if she appears as a witness in the trial. I read the deposition first and thought that it was Linda Drane Burdick’s precise questioning that made Buchanan’s statements seem so vauge. But, no; Ms Burdick’s approach actually helped Buchanan seem more focused than how she comes off in the phone conversation transcripts. I don’t think she finished one sentence in a hundred pages and she contradicts herself on EVERY point of fact.
Laura Buchanan is her own eraser. That’s the only way I can describe her statements. She is a microcosm of the defense’s position in this case. Aren’t they scared yet?
I have the feeling Cheney Mason has already left the building.
” Laura Buchanan is her own eraser”
Classic.
B
Hey Kleat, thanks for that video link.
It appears that something’s very amiss with the defense expert witness roster. I feel that it’s not just Jose Baez trying to hold out on the prosecution anymore. (He can’t be trying that, still?) Are some of the experts, themselves, witholding from the defense?
Re: EliGrandma says:
January 29, 2011 at 7:47 pm
I promise you, this is a bigger mess than an un-delivered crate of oranges.
Out on the limb here- Dr. Lee will testify in this trial in some capacity if there is no plea.
B
I don’t understand how Dr. Lee could be called to testify if his report is not turned over to the prosecution. Isn’t that what JP ruled? Can Baez play this type of game just to keep the SA confused and them abush at trial? I think I’m the one who’s confused. Can anyone explain. TIA
——————–
Blink’s statement above, intigued me too.
Back when it was mentioned in a couple of the hearings that Dr Lee might not give a report due to nonpayment of his previous work for the defense; I wondered, how could he not be called to testify? (Report or not?) He was allowed to examine the car & its contents early on and pointed out the 5(?) hairs that OCSO hadn’t yet isolated.
At trial, the prosecution will surely introduce the hair from the trunk which has the death ring. In doing so, they will need to also include all the hair collected from the trunk and the garbage bag that was initially disposed from the trunk at the impound lot. Thus, Dr Lee is part of the chain of evidence.
Of course, I don’t imply this is what Blink is refering to, specifically.
What I wonder is, since Dr Lee was brought into the case as an expert witness for the defense and if he continues to withold himself on the grounds of nonpayment; if he is called to witness by the prosecution, is that a problem?
Annals, unless the defense experts are reading something we haven’t (which is possible), how could they honestly be an expert for the defense? Somehow I think honesty will play a key role with the experts.
Hi Sister, Do you mean that the evidence doesn’t give the defense experts much to work with, as in; evidence which points to Casey’s innocence? So how can they honestly testify to her innocence? I tend to agree with that in the totality of the evidence we see.
I don’t mean to imply that the experts are doing anything nefarious. The defense needs to be able to pick away at the individual pieces of evidence as best they can.
Perhaps some of the defense experts are taking the position I once read posted on the wall of a state agency; “Don’t expect your procrastination to become our emergency.”
Blink and all, not sure if you have seen the latest rumblings around the blogs regarding JB and possible shady antics/LE’s Parallel investigation -but just in case you haven’t:
Defense/JB tampering?
http://www.cfnews13.com/static/articles/images/documents/courtmotionsTQS.pdf
Includes- but not limited to TES volunteers Jay Jordon, Laura Buchanan sworn statements -letter/s from JB asking BC for “Casey’s” computer & lap top and all items from her bedroom- and per BC (alleged) offer, TES records on Keith Williams, Roy Kronk, Howard Earl Tate, Cedric Lamont Kirby, and Alphonso Hamilton- At the same time, a # times JB asked BC to look for anything pertaining to LB
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/70388758/20101003-
Brad-Conway-Interview very interesting
http://www.wftv.com/pdf/24581637/detail.html
Earlier Media coverage of Letters, Emails, Docs Released In Casey Case
New or renewed search for kyron is currently underway according to the oregonian. Keeping my fingers crossed.
Mom 3.0; The video clips you posted play identically for me. I had never seen it, as I was unaware of the case until Aug 08.
If ever a video belongs in a hubris article that one gets it done. When Cindy says;
“If everyone holds one of those jigsaw pieces, they might not realize they have it till they start givin’ it to me and I can start building that puzzle.”
That one statement of Cindy’s is an example of why this case became so fascinating to me. A missing child, the mother telling outrageous lies and the grandmother desperately (publicly) parsing through the netwark of lies as if therein lies the truth; all the while lying to LE (& the public), herself.
It also immediately brought Yuri Melich to mind; telling Cindy she can not run the investigation.
Here’s the clip again, thanks, Mom 3.0.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fld9Q0PgCss
Just got finished reading the statements of Brad Conway.
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/70388758/20101003-Brad-Conway-Interview
He sounds madder than a wet hornet at bozo. I’m surprised this isn’t a lead story, although I believe this has been discussed before. I just hadn’t read the interview. bozo is acting like there is this fraternity among lawyers that they will lie to each other. Brad is bascially saying, in the words of Robyn Adams, “that ain’t my recliner to sit in.”
I finally got through all of Robyn Adam’s statements. First impression I don’t think she is telling everything she knows. I think she is holding back pertinent information. Perhaps, because if Casey did confess to her anything of what happened Robin might feel it is her testimoney that leads to a death sentence. Secondly, if they spent a whole night in the same cell, that is a lot of time for Casey not to have said anything pertinent along with all the other times they talked through the door. When the officer the was questioning Robin asked here out of 100% what percent does he not know yet Robin replies 25%…what is that other 25% about? She hesitates to long in between the question and the answer. I just felt there is more and we are not getting it.
Just thought of another thing, when the Officer asked her if Casey told her who Caylee’s father was she replied “Eric” isn’t Eric the guy in the service that was out in CA and that is the person Casey called to say she was coming and had something to tell him, vs Jesus Ortiz that died in the accident?