Caylee/Casey Anthony Case: Halt Your Hubristic Hubrishness Jose Baez.. We Are All Stocked Up Here
Disclaimer–
“He has lulled himself into a false sense of competence.”
Hold The Hubris Pass The Humility
The saga begins as follows:
Aging local *legend in his own mind* defense attorney gets “defendant envy” when he sees the dude he thought was the busboy at all The Florida Bar functions, making more on his first big case, with more media face time, than Or lawn do has ever seen. Seasoned barrister signs on for his professional *see alice*, if you will.
Wait, kidding, not the saga in question, my bad.
Yesterday, on behalf of Casey Anthony, lead counsel with Jose Baez, J. Cheney Mason put to “motion” what undoubtedly was screaming inside his head as Mr. Baez bumbled, err, argued, against the States motion for contempt and sanctions last week. The reconsideration request drafted by Attorney Mason will undoubtedly come as a surprise to Judge Perry. When his Honor asked Mason why the deadline was not met at the State’s hearing:
..”Was there any particular reason that was not complied with?..”
Mason replied, “The answer to that is I don’t know.”
Mr. Baez was found in contempt and fined less than the cost of his ipad.
I am not an attorney, but I do know that you cannot introduce new and different bullsh*it you neglected to bore the court with previously AND when you had the opportunity to respond and argue with a new tie and pocketsquare ensemble.
Apparently Judge Perry was not swayed by Baez “.. They say they will call but they never do..” argument, insinuating all Jeff Ashton had to do was call him to work out what his other previous 4 email requests could not.
Makes sense to me now that he put it like that, right?
Everyone knows you can trust what a defense attorney says on the phone who will not commit same information to writing. Duh.
Damn this traffic jam how I hate to be late.. It hurts my motor to go so slow..
I have this vision of Atty Slabaugh driving down the 4 with the top down and the 300 pages he threw in the back “loose”, are flying all over the freeway behind him. So that’s the problem.. the dang clerk’s office refusing to tie up their fax, dedicate 2 folks to replace toner and paper in the middle of the 300 page and 5 hour late response, while jamming every other case and function, for Casey Anthony. Missed the memo as well, I presume.
How insensitive. First word folks.. flash-drive. Second word.. GARMIN. It does not take 5 hours to get from Kissimme to Orlando, and that’s assuming he left when the filing was already past deadline.
Moving on to the defense’s whine list:
My fave- Dr. Lee found 17 hairs in a car that is believed to have transported the victim in this instant capital murder case and therefore he should not be expected to testify about it.
BBBBBBBBAAAAAHHHHHHHAAAAAA. Seriously?
To date, this is absolutely the most laughable attempt to publicly excuse a witness who Mr. Baez apparently does not consider important enough to pay his dang expenses out of pocket for.
I hear this in my head:
Dr. Lee is not going to be called to testify OR be available for a deposition, cause, like, maybe the harsh weather will not produce that case of luscious oranges, but we are not sure yet, so please wait while we ask the plant lady, who will of course be testifying about plants, but you knew that already. Please tell me you knew that already.
Not to be confused with p-l-a-n-t-i-n-g, as we plan to move to strike or suppress any appearance of the words ” Dr. Henry Lee” and the word “planting” that appear on the same page of any document or media article, as well as within the silent thoughts of any of them-there bloggin’ types.
Lest we forget, Mr. Lee, who will not be testifying anyway if his expenses are not going to be paid, was denied access to an active homicide recovery scene while CST’s were still removing the tiny bones of Caylee Anthony from her swamp tomb.. the nerve of OCSO.
I mean, who knows what Dr. Lee could have come up with in that cornucopia of specimens.
Maybe even Kronk’s Oscar Meyer weenie whistle from the third grade perhaps.
Apparently the defense team , while discussing the virtues of Jose Hubris’s new “do”, missed the free lesson on the actual designation of the Crime Scene Technician, or CST, as mentioned by Jeff Ashton as opposed to the continued reference to “CSI” in defense motions.
Freeman is Freed
Dr. Michael Freeman, who up until last forever was working on his reports for the defense, will not be testifying, although he has not been removed from the defense witness list by presstime.
In an earlier blinkoncrime.com article, I opined about Dr. Freeman’s potential contribution to the case as it relates to a possible death by natural causes. In Judge Perry’s contempt order, it is clear that any expert witness whose opinions or conclusions are not part of discovery, will be excluded from the trial testimony by the defense.
Note- no reporting, no conclusions, no discovery from Dr. Freeman, an expert witness listed in a two year old case. Draw your own conclusions, or, maybe the incident in Washington where an individual with the same name and age helped himself to an Army cell phone that did not belong to him at a Federal facility is “of concern”.
A hearing is scheduled this Friday January 14 to hear the matter.
Late this morning a Judicial Assistant from Chief Judge Perry’s Chambers, speaking from a microphone at the defense table he turned on and off by himself, read aloud to Blink, Editor In Chief blinkoncrime.com, the order he is to prepare for Friday, as dictated to him by my Judge Perry daydream-thought-bubble this afternoon:
Mr. Mason, what you’ve just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul*.
Full disclosure: Maybe without his reading glasses Cheney Mason thought he was penning a request for a vacation, not a request to vacate.. In which case, who could blame the man? I say grant it without prejudice or reservations.
JP Image by Klaasend
*Y’all know that quote is from Billy Madison
.
Related Posts
Related Posts:
526 Comments
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
Fingers crossed the ‘death smell’ is allowed.
My fingers are crossed we are lucky to HHJP on the case he is on the Ball and On to the DUHFENSE as well I have faith in JP. I also have faith in Our Heavenly Father to allow Justice for CAYLEE.
Hello- I finally got a chance to read the motion of regarding the garbage.
If I am understanding this correctly the Defense has disproved their own motion within their motion, in this instance.
Let me try to explain,
The Defense says that the garbage bag and contents were not handled properly- the trash was allowed to dry out, was separated and “aired out”, in addition to being stored in an unsealed cardboard box. Thereby destroying the odor. The Defense then says that the smell has not been preserved, for the jury….they go on to say that the carpet lining ,however, was kept in a secure sealed environment, thereby preserving its smell- …
What’s the problem? The Defense says that their client had a bag of trash, with food products sitting in the hot sun, for 18 days…. They have stated they believe the “smell” in the trunk came from the trash, they say that is the reason the car stunk,is because of the trash. They say the tow truck driver said it, Cindy said it ect- Well- if the smell in the trunk came from the garbage- regardless if it was allowed to “air out”
or how it was stored, The State preserved the “evidence” of the smell (garbage says JB & Co) by sealing the carpet off the trunk….no harm no foul …. Right?
sindy’s 911 call “car smells like dead body, etc” is STILL allowed if the carpet smell is not.
Good evening all! Thanks again friends for the links and updates!
I’ve been re familiarizing myself for the past week on this case. I’m trying to refresh my memory on the infinite details. I keep thinking everything we need to know is all in the 31 days.
From one link to another, I came across Lee’s initial (I believe) statement to investigators. Something in a comment that he made to investigators stood out to me (and maybe to others):
QUOTING ARTICLE w/ link:
Lee Anthony talked to Casey and told her she needed to come clean
before detectives arrived.
He played the role of a police officer, saying, “The officer is going
to say, ‘Good evening, Mrs. Anthony. Um, where is your daughter?’ And
she says, ‘She’s sleeping.’ And again, playing the role of the police
officer, I say to my sister, ‘Great Mrs. Anthony. That’s going to be a
relief to everybody. Let’s go get her.’”
The detectives then told Lee Anthony, “You just gave her a slap of
reality.”
Lee Anthony replied, “exactly.” ( http://tinyurl.com/4hepzdt )
UNQUOTE
Lee, in the role of detective, asks Ms. Anthony where Caylee is. Ms. Anthony’s reply is ‘….she’s sleeping’.
Casey lies to Lee without leaning on the nanny story. Her immediate response is ‘she’s sleeping’. The wheels must have been spinning shortly thereafter. Possibly, the nanny taking Caylee hadn’t materialized until after her ‘slap of reality’ from Lee. It either shows she really believed she pulled off the perfect murder and ‘partied on’ OR she was biding her time to figure out how she’d explain Caylee’s disappearance. I think the later b/c she’d already proven herself to be an expert at dodging the truth.
What’s sad is the possibility of Casey thinking of Caylee as just sleeping during those 31 days. Perhaps a coping skill to perceive her deed as acceptable behaviour? Who knows but it’s already been determined Casey doesn’t think like a healthy minded individual.
This is speculation on my part, but at the very least, it would appear Casey had not come up with an alibi when Lee confronted her.
terry
amen sista I agree.
chelsea
crossing my eyes and toes too!!
Concerning the defense motion to exclude any mention of the smell in the trunk of Casey’s car;
As Mom 3.0 points out, the defense is saying that LE allowed the items in the bag ‘o garbage to dry out thus disapating the really bad garbage smell, whereas; LE made a concerted effort to preserve the alledged human decomposition smell in the trunk carpet by sealing a piece of it in a can. The motion goes as far to say; “Law enforcement has destroyed exculpatory evidence.” Thus references to bad smells in the car should be disallowed at trial.
Link to the motion:
http://www.wftv.com/pdf/26833993/detail.html
I remembered that when I saw the items from the trunk, it didn’t seem that they would create much smell even when closed in a trunk in Florida summer heat for 18 days. So I looked at it again. It’s cans, cartons, wrappers, containers, drier sheets and napkins; no actual food except perhaps a bit of residue.
On a scale of 1 to 10 for garbage likely to get smelly in the heat and attract flies; with 1 being no smell and 10 being knock ya back intolerable; I call this garbage a 2. (And I am fanatically judgemental when it comes to garbage that might produce smells. Heck, I rinse the egg whites out of eggshells when collecting them for use in my garden soil.)
If you’re interested, take a look. Worst things in the lot are Velveeta wrappers and a plastic hard salami container. I’d characterize it as a bag ‘o dry trash to begin with. LE didn’t destroy any exculpatory evidence in this lot.
Here’s the link to the trash; scroll along till you get the stuff spread out on a table. There are close to 40 pictures of the trash.
http://www.wftv.com/slideshow/news/19105250/detail.html
The human ability to distinguish smells is as true as our ability to distinguish colors. We can distinguish rose from lilac; garlic from onion; and moldy Velveeta from decomposed flesh.
Annals, Mom3.0., Chica….and friends <3 …
2 =+ 2 = 4. It's a fact and ya can't mess with science. The stain and the smell go hand in hand. No way in high heaven will one will be allowed with the other.
The smell cannot be unstunk. It was there. Ya got an entire family and an amscot employee who identified the smell of decomposition in one form another. Georgie….please don't let that be my Caylee. Cindy….who died in there? Lee…..it was like a wave, potent, something you'd never forget. And Casey….it smells like someone died in my car. Caylee's missing but it's most likely a squirrel. COME ON!!!!
The defense may be doing there job but with this one, it's called grasping. I'll roller skate in a buffalo herd if HHBP doesn't allow this evidence at the trial.
Blessings and Benedictions my friends~~~~
Evidently, according to WESH, the State filed a response (on Fri) to the defense motion to exclude references of smells in the trunk and to exclude the trunk-carpet-sample-in-a-can. (As far as I can tell the States actual motion has not yet been posted on the internet.)
I am posting a link to the WESH story here with a warning. It seems to me that some of the statements made by the reporters are inaccurate. They are saying that the State’s motion makes a NEW claim; that being; the stain on the trunk carpet contains biological by-products of human decomposition. (This is in opposition to a phrase in the defense’s motion; “the trunk liner carpet had no biological evidence on or in it”.)
The State’s biological evidence is contained in the final report by Vass & company. It says that in addition to testing stuff from the trunk using air sample testing, they also tested the items for chemical extractions. The chemical extraction tests showed the presence of grave wax.
WESH seems to not remember seeing this evidence previously presented by the State, but some of us here in the internet do. I’m posting a link to the report by Vass stored over at Hinky Meter. If Val at Hinky has it, the State presented it in discovery. (The report is dated April 28, 2009.)
http://www.thehinkymeter.com/Library/CMA/reports/fbiodoranalysis6551_6591.pdf
The WESH report on the State’s motion is very interesting dispite their assertion that it’s new evidence;
http://www.wesh.com/caseyanthony/26833632/detail.html
——————————————————–
Where, oh, where is Dorothy Clay Sims? I thought that she would have been writing some of the defense’s recent motions on forensic evidence!?
———————
The smell cannot be unstunk. -Ragdoll
Annals
baez continues to make a fool of himself. He spews anything that comes out of his mouth. He is acting like a lover trying to vindicate his lover not like that of a professionel atty.
anyways here an interesting article
The Lie Guy® blog
Stan B. Walters, CSP “The Lie Guy®” Helping people, agencies and organizations accurately read and understand deception and learn how they can uncover the “real” story.
http://www.thelieguyblog.com/my_weblog/2008/10/casey-anthony-a-masterful-investigation—casey-anthonys-lies-will-convict-her.html
Casey Anthony: A Masterful Investigation – Casey Anthony’s Lies Will Convict Her.
My hat’s off to the Orange County Sheriff’s Office, Lead Investigator Yuri Melich and the rest of the investigators on this case. They have done a FANTASTIC job. We’re going to see a great case brought against her because of their very professional ad tireless dedication to this case. (Watch the defense attack them by the way!!)
Ragdoll
hello and lol about the unthunk!!
baez is off the hook crazy!! he is out of control like his client and everytime he opens his mouth you smell caca!! lol
blessings to you too and I agree if the honorable judge doesnt allow the smell into evidence I will eat crow until I spit feathers. Too bazaar this idiot wanna bee atty I WANT HIM DISBARRED.
CAN I GET AN AMEN!!!
I need to correct something I wrote in my most recent post. The prosecution motion filed on Fri (2-11-11) is in response to the 12-30-2010 Defense Motion to Exclude Irrelevant Evidence of Stain in Trunk of Car (not the defense motion to exclude references to smells in the trunk).
Link to the relevant defense motion;
http://www.ninthcircuit.org/news/High-Profile-Cases/Anthony/Downloads/Motion%20to%20Exclude%20-%20Stain%20in%20Trunk%20of%20Car.pdf
I was set straight by reading an article in the Orlando Sentinel about (in part) the Prosecution’s motion. It’s a good meaty article which ends with this pithy quote from Ashton’s motion;
Ashton also challenges the defense team’s contention that the stain evidence would impede Anthony’s ability to get a fair trial.
“The defendant has failed to set forth what unfair prejudice they fear,” Ashton writes. “If the jury concludes, based upon all of the evidence presented in the case, that the stain in the trunk of the car was caused by the decomposition of a body kept there, then it is powerful and appropriate evidence of her guilt.”
However, he added, “If they conclude that the stain is from some other innocent source, then they would conclude that it is neither relevant nor prejudicial. Is the defendant seriously concerned about a bias against sloppy car owners?” [end of snip]
This is’nt the most important argument the Sentinel quoted from Ashton’s motion, it’s just my favorite. Here’s a link to the article:
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/local/caylee-anthony/os-casey-anthony-trunk-body-smell-20110211,0,5131139.story
I am guessing that there is at least one other Prosecution motion filed last week because of the 2-11-11 deadline agreed upon for Jeff Ashton to reply to the Motion to Exclude the Heart Sticker in addition to the trunk stain matter.
THIS IS INTERESTING!
http://blogs.discovery.com/criminal_report/2008/08/greg-padilla-on.html
Despite the fact that they are both bounty hunters who live in the same area and work on the same streets, it has been over a decade since Leonard and Greg Padilla have had a single conversation.
Neither brother will comment on what led to their family feud; however, despite their differences, Greg, who also works as a bail agent, stands behind his brother and supports his decision to bail out Casey Anthony, mother of missing three-year-old Caylee Anthony.
http://womenincrimeink.blogspot.com/2008/08/did-beautiful-young-florida-mom-kill_03.html
Did Beautiful, Young Florida Mom Kill Her Baby Girl? Two Legendary Homicide Detectives Weigh In
Hey, Chica. You’re right. This is the first trial I’ve followed to the extent that I read the motions and follow the pretrial hearings. The difference in approach between the defense and prosecution motions & statements in the hearings is such a huge gap.
The prosecution is on top of the issues and what they say makes sense. The defense on the other hand, lags behind, then they come with emotional drivel. Is this typical of defense arguments?
Chica, I don’t remember reading that article — still rings true today! Thanks for posting it.
Happy Valentine’s Day!
Chica, beautiful young mother eh? I needed an LOL today!
Beauty must be in the eyes of the beholder. Casey is ‘cute’ at best (as her mother told Zenaida, she’s no 10) BUT I’m not feeling generous with compliments of a mutha who kills her daughter. If she was ever beautiful, it died and Caylee took it home with her. Anything that made Casey beautiful had EVERYTHING to do with her precious INNOCENT BEAUTIFUL daughter.
Now she is the epitome of beautiful. What are these men seeing? They look like they can afford lasik.
Thanks for the links y’all! As always, great information shared
Court Reporter accuses Anthony defense of misstating the facts……
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/local/breakingnews/os-casey-anthony-court-reporting-20110214,0,1934944.story
What appears like a small deal to some, imo, will be a serious issue to his honor.
He is a champion of assets that support the court outside of the blowhard barrister.
There just does not seem to be enough cake for Baez to serve the common folk apparently
B
Blink, I believe His Honor will now question any statement made by bozo, et al as being doubtful at best and probably a lie. Now I see why the Anthonys and their “half truth” statements make bozo the perfect attorney for their daughter. No wonder they support him. A word game . . . His Honor will be no respector of such BS.
Thanks for that link, OhioSheryl. It’s Cheney Mason who made the representation to the court about the TN court reporting service’s agreement to indigancy rates then later being unwilling to accept the JAC rate. It’s in the the WFTV video of the 11-29-10 hearing starting at @ the 20 minute mark:
http://www.wftv.com/video/25949991/index.html
It’s also included in a motion submitted by Mr Mason. It states that the agreement to indigent rates was made verbally. Link to the motion:
http://www.ninthcircuit.org/news/High-Profile-Cases/Anthony/Downloads/Motion%20to%20Compel%20JAC%20to%20Pay%20for%20Transcripts%20of%20Oak%20Ridge%20National%20Lab%20Depos.pdf
And here’s a link to the Orlando Sentinel article again:
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/local/breakingnews/os-casey-anthony-court-reporting-20110214,0,1934944.story
Sister
happy belated valentines day to you too. wow this is just getting better with so much drama!
Annals
young at heart here lol
Beautiful young mother my arse!
wipe the makeup off her face and consider the hubris attitude and where is the beauty now. make up does wonders.
so now let’s see what judge perry does about all this!
blink/and blinksters?
does the FB keep up with all these complaints being as they are in the front pages of every newspaper in orlando and nearby? are they privvy to it all ya think?
HAL’S NOTE: They did not. The state attorney’s office says everything that was due by today is in, my colleague Anthony Colarossi reports.
It was in reference to if they missed filing their expert reports.
Bill Shaeffer weighs in on Anthony Defense/court reporter kerflunkle:
http://www.wftv.com/news/26876699/detail.html
This WFTV article also contains a link to the reporting firm’s letter to Judge Perry with attachments (the emails between the reporting firm, Baez’s office and Mason’s office). If you’re curious to see Judge Perry’s order for payment, which is the document that tipped the owner of the reporting firm about the misrepresentation, I’m linking that here:
http://www.ninthcircuit.org/news/High-Profile-Cases/Anthony/Downloads/Order%20Granting%20Motion%20to%20Authorize%20&%20Compel%20Preparation%20of%20Transcripts.pdf
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/local/breakingnews/os-casey-anthony-tuesday-motions-20110215,0,7636578.story
Casey Anthony prosecution challenges defense motions to exclude evidence
By Anthony Colarossi, Orlando Sentinel
6:34 p.m. EST, February 15, 2011
New motions filed by prosecutors in the Casey Anthony case this week challenge the defense team’s attempts to exclude scientific evidence in the case.
The prosecution also objects to the defense team’s listing of a WFTV reporter and others as witnesses so late in the case.
Assistant State Attorney Jeff Ashton on Tuesday filed a motion to strike the defense team’s motion to exclude certain evidence regarding Chloroform — evidence expected to be critical in the state’s case against Anthony.
The defense is arguing that the evidence is unreliable. But Ashton’s motion says the defense argument “contains only conclusory statements of counsel and no authorities suggesting that the procedure is not generally accepted.”
Ashton goes on to say the defense motion is “glaringly insufficient” while saying that the test instruments used to detect chloroform in this case are known and the techniques “routinely accepted as evidence in courts throughout the state.”
WFTV: CASEY’S DEFENSE ADDS MORE WITNESSES
Casey’s defense team added more people to its list of witnesses Tuesday. They include two prison inmates.
Both Robin Adams and Maya Derkovic were Casey’s jailhouse friends. Also on the list are Texas EquuSearch volunteers, and WFTV’s Kathi Belich, though Casey’s lawyers haven’t said why she is on the list.
http://www.wftv.com/news/26876699/detail.html
Thanks for all the links and insights annals and all.
As I went searching for The Motion’s that were shown in Wesh’s reprt- I found these:
Wesh’s report regarding The Stain
http://www.wesh.com/r-video/26838566/detail.html
http://bullstopper.wordpress.com/2011/01/page/2/
Article about The Defense’s motion to exclude the Stain
The State’s response to Defense’s Motion
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/71674378/20110210-State-Response-to-Motion-to-Exclude-Trunk-Stain
More links to new documents to follow…
Thanks to ” Potato” from Hinky for Posting these from WS:
01/27/2011 SA Notice of Provision of Supplemental Discovery
Discovery Documents Pages 24461-24462 (Computer Forensics Examination Report by
Sandra Osborne)
02/10/2011 SA Notice of Provision of Supplemental Discovery
I. CD-R – Discovery Documents Pages 24461-24569 (includes Dr. Haskell’ s Addendum
Report – Pgs 24567-24569)
2 . CD-R – Julie Davis’s Int. 2/3/11 “TES” K-9
3. CD-R- Color Photos of TES Documents RE: Julie Davis
4, CD-R – Items shown during Julie Davis’ Interview 2/3/11
5. CD-R- NClS / Mark-Hawkins recorded on 10/10/08
02.04.2011 Court Minutes
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/71674110/20 … rt-Minutes
2011.02.04 Notice of Filing – Kathy Reichs Twitters
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/71674168/20 … s-Twitters
2011.02.14 JAC Response to Request for Transcription Services – WLF
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/71674450/20 … ices—WLF
2011.02.14 JAC Response to Request for Transcription Services – Anthonys
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/71674511/20 … –Anthonys
2011.02.15 State Motion to strike Defense Supplemental Witness List 02.14.2011 (WITH EXHIBITS)
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/71674592/20 … t-02142011
Found this at WFTV:
Sheaffer’s analysis of the complaint you can also find a video report about Baez’s lying to the court at link as well as the document
Scroll down to JB’s picture…
http://www.wftv.com/video/26875755/index.html
Seems to me the DUH-fense is following Andrea Lyons advice and filing motion on top of motions after motions.
I had posted a link a few days ago regarding Casey’s myspace comments may be used as evidence.
Was it blocked for a particular reason? Just in case there was an oversight, I’ll include it here:
‘Casey Trial Evidence Breaks Legal Ground’
http://www.wesh.com/video/26864721/detail.html
Now to catch up on the new links posted recently! Have a fantastical day y’all!
here are some good links:
original “motion to suppress”:
http://www.wesh.com/pdf/26367661/detail.html
today’s “amended motion to suppress”:
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/71719679/20 … Statements
they have added on statements she made in the cop car on october 14th , to edwards.
———————————————————————-
the statements the defense wants suppressed—
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eiq6BEW7ygA
p1/3 – Casey Anthony Surreptitious Recording – Secretly Taped in Police Car
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JMgidLf8D5U
part 2–
http://www.freewebs.com/cayleebloggers/ … police-car
part 3–
——————————————————————-
Here is the Defense repsonse to State’s Motion to Strike Supplemental Witness List:
http://www.wesh.com/pdf/26889140/detail … ey+updates
——————————————————————–
Here is the Defense repsonse to State’s Motion to Strike Supplemental Witness List:
http://www.wesh.com/pdf/26889140/detail … ey+updates
——————————————————————–
Baez thinks LDB should call him and get his permission 1st before filing motions on behalf of the state
———————————————————————-
Charges: BAEZ, JOSE ANGEL Statute Level Date
1. TR- UNLAWFUL SPEED – LIMITED ACCESS 316.187(2)(A) No Degree – Infraction 10/22/2010
11/01/2010 Payable Infraction Filed
11/08/2010 Correspondence
11/10/2010 Elected School Option on Speeding
02/09/2011 Suspension Pending Failure to Pay
02/15/2011 Case Being Audited For Suspension
02/16/2011 Suspension Issued Failed to Pay
Defendant BAEZ, JOSE ANGEL
Total Financial Assessment 152.00
Total Payments and Credits 129.00
Balance Due as of 02/16/2011 23.00
——————————————————————–
http://www.wesh.com/pdf/26887809/detail.html
Judge Ok’d more money to the defense, this time for transcripts as requested here.
——————————————————————
maybe kathi b
Someone purchased the JB DL document today :
02/16/2011 Transaction Assessment 2.00
02/16/2011 Counter Payment Receipt # CR-2011-10553 BAEZ, JOSE ANGEL (2.00)
http://www.wesh.com/r/26890908/detail.html
Casey’s High School Boyfriend To Be Witness
Defense Attorneys Say Man Can Confirm Date Of Diary Entry
POSTED: 5:04 pm EST February 16, 2011
UPDATED: 5:58 pm EST February 16, 2011
ORLANDO, Fla. — Casey Anthony’s defense attorneys said Wednesday they plan to call Anthony’s former high school boyfriend as a witness to further establish a passage she wrote in her diary.
Video Report: http://www.wesh.com/video/26891494/detail.html
check this out!
I went on ebay and couldn’t find it or any mention of it.
Is this crazy or what.
http://articles.orlandosentinel.com/200 … th-penalty
Yearbook with Casey Anthony photos sells for $500 on eBay
June 04, 2009|By Susan Jacobson, Sentinel Staff Writer
Recession? What recession?
An unnamed buyer spent $500 on eBay Wednesday for a dog-eared copy of a high-school yearbook with pictures of Casey Anthony inside.
The yearbook, titled Our Lives and subtitled 2003 Sentry, did not belong to Anthony. But she is pictured in the travel and tourism club and as a member of the junior class, according to the listing.
Hi all,
I have been reading and re-reading the document dumps but I have never rand across Malory’s Depo….We have gotten the Duhfense the last Depo’s of the Duhfenses I searched the area and their was no body Witness NOT a few weeks ago. Why haven’t we seen anything from Malory’s?
Hi Terry, I don’t think that the depositions taken by the defense are public record.
correct
B
Thanks Blink,
I was under the impression that that LE was taking one….Thanks so much for pointing that out.
Judge Perry issues Order Setting Hearing on State’s Motion to Strike Supplemental Witness List. (It is scheduled for March 2.)
http://www.ninthcircuit.org/news/High-Profile-Cases/Anthony/Downloads/Order%20Setting%20Hearing%20on%20States%20Motion%20to%20Strike%20Def%20Supplemental%20Witness%20List.pdf
Hey all!
I wish I remember the link. The article was older but it did state that we have not heard all the evidence nor will we until trial. LE is holding back which is exactly what they should be doing. I got a great sense of encouragement that there are crucial details linking Casey to the death of her daughter. (Mallory’s depo, latent prints, whatever was collected in the backyard and inside the Ant’s home, etc).
If the state is pushing for the DP, they have good cause for it. Something will tie Casey to this. The only question I have is….LWOP or DP? What will the jury go for.
Crossing all my digits! <3
Will Sean Krause’s relationship with Cindy Anthony possible be used by the prosecution? Or can it be used against Casey?
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,481851,00.html
http://media.trb.com/media/acrobat/2009-06/47469272.pdf
Interview of Sean Krause w/ Det. Yuri Melich.
Cindy ‘knew’ Casey did something to Caylee. I pray this is admissable.
# 35… did not know that. Thanks.
Thanks to everyone for keeping us updated.
It is hard to believe that March is right around the corner, Frye hearings, ect… May is coming up fast. I find all of these motions tedious, but understand the need for both sides to be thorough. I am starting to doubt whether this will be ready for trial in May, especially since the Defense, it seems as just recently seemed to get that trial time is fast approaching…
I can’t imagine the tension The Anthony’s must be feeling. I wonder if the reality of it all has finally made an impact on Casey?
When I think how this all could have been avoided if Casey had just told the truth. So much pain and anguish for so many people, brought on by her inability to care. Mind boggling, really.
Thanks again Blink and everyone for your opinions/links ect.
Ragdoll – didn’t Blink use those words in one of her postings, months ago. I seem to recall being heartened at the time as it appeared to imply that the State had much up it’s sleeve. Or is that wishful thinking on my part?
All the motions to suppress aside, how will the defense ever get around the fact that little Caylee was not reported missing for 31 days, the duct tape and so much more. How could anyone ever wrap their mind around this. No excuses, no mother, unless guilty would try to pull this.
Reasonable people, 12 of them, will be “the voice of reason” in this case.
B
Chelsea, Blink probably did say that. I’m always the first to admit my thoughts have probably and most likely have already been expressed by someone else. If it pops in my head, I share it. I by no means compare myself to the tireless efforts and intelligent minds on Blink’s site.
I did make the comment honestly, in my defense.
momof3
I guess you’ve heard the rumor? Casey is falling apart, talking to herself and answering herself. I don’t know if it’s just another ploy by her and the defense to pre-pare fr the penalty phase. OR Just another rumor! who knows. I agree there must be alot of tension in the anthonys home!! unavoidable! so deserving!!
Hi Ragdoll, you had me thinking about a possible link and the only thing I could recall was (possibly) Blink mentioning something similar. I love that everyone honestly writes their thoughts; you are a great contributor and I love reading everyone’s postings so please don’t imagine I was trying to ‘correct’ you in any way, just adding my two’pennorth from my poor old memory.
Would Casey be able to take an Alford plea? I don’t really know much about this but came across it on another blog. Would it explain Bozo being unconcerned about experts and timings etc.? How close to a trial can a defense leave it before pleading? Would appreciate any thoughts.
Chelsea, thank you for your compliment. I just happened to stumble on Sean’s transcript going from one link to another. I had completely forgot about his involvement and thought….why not post something about it? Ya never know…lol.
I really do appreciate your tactfulness. Thank you friendy =)
Ragdoll
hiya friend! I too enjoyed going back and reading about the interview! cindy knew casey killed caylee! the sad part is she will spend the rest of her life carrying that cross on her shoulders/back. She deserves everything evil for all the evil that she has done to others/innocent people. All to protect the evil spawn of hers. I cannot wait until they all are held accountable. I hope that after casey gets hers! her attorney gets his biggtime!!! and kathi belich can have the honor of covering baez fall from grace!!!/dethroned!!! the anthonys will follow suit!! INCLUDING TUBE SOCKS!!!