Casey Anthony Trial: The State Discovers The Elusive 17th Allele- BOMBSHELL Discovery Of The Deuchebag Chromosome, Belongs To Bereaved Gram Cindy Anthony (UPDATED)

Orlando, FL– I swear on my Blinkette’s, at no time, did I ever picture the word that rhymes with “euchebag” if you add a D, would appear in a title on my site. Today’s testimony by Academy Of Parental Enablers Resulting in Toddler Death President (AOPERTDP),  Cindy Anthony , took the strand. I said strand on purpose. I am convinced the elusive 17th allele comes from her. I daydream she left it on the shovel by attempting to dig herself a hole following the conclusion of her filicidic daughter’s trial.

 

Cindy Orl sent June 23

No such luck. This former Gentiva Supervisor, Licensed by the state of Florida as a registered nurse, now thinks she may have  been home on the days of March 17th and March 21st and her former employer, required her and other salaried employees to falsify their timecards in an agency subject to HIPAA regulations. 

Cindy Timecard

Mrs. Anthony, although it would mean she came home for less than 30 minutes on both days, if she indeed returned to work, brought her own smell of decomposition.  Decomposition of her loyalty to the legacy of her 34 month old grandbaby, Caylee Marie. By the time of this publication, I have requested comment from John Camperlengo, Gentiva Chief Compliance Officer, and will post upon reply.

UPDATE: The Following Is the Reply I received from Senior Vice President, Chief Compliance Officer and General Counsel to Gentiva, John Camperlengo, published with permission.

Thanks for your note.  As a matter of policy, Gentiva does not comment on matters being litigated before the courts. What we can tell you is Gentiva complies with all relevant Federal and State regulations, rules and guidelines concerning patient and staff records. And we cooperate fully with responsible authorities when requested to aid them in research in investigations. Best Regards, John

O and Cindy, thanks for bringing up your concerns about the dogs eating bamboo leaves. Further computer forensic scrutiny shows that the dogs were PRECLUDED from being in the backyard as a result. Which, Casey knew, and certainly strongly assissted in avoiding detection of her granddaughter’s remains in her playhouse for days. Not to creepy, not to soul-less, right? Did the Baez/Rosebud braintrust consider they gave the jury exactly what they needed to explain Casey Anthony’s alternative universe and fancy for pathological lying? Apples and Trees, as we say in Jersey. God Rest this child in your loving care, which begining June 16th, is the only loving care that has mattered.

 (Editor’s Note: I apologize in advance for offending any readers with my editorial,  I am a victim’s avocate before a journalist anyday.)

Related Posts:

484 Comments

  1. Eloise says:

    ~snip~
    In Memory of Gini says:
    June 24, 2011 at 11:47 am

    I looked up Dysfunction in the dictionary and there was a picture of the Anthony’s….what a sad bunch of enabling co-dependents these people are.
    ***************

    LOL. I bet they are in Wikipedia too.

  2. mayhem says:

    WPG says:

    June 24, 2011 at 11:40 am

    If the dogs appeared sleepy they were probably TIRED from all the crap going on in that house.

    ——
    LOL those poor pups!

  3. nana2 says:

    HLN Jean Caseras reporting that Lee seen eating lunch by himself could it be he didn’t say on the stand what he had been prepped to say ?

  4. raceyrin says:

    Blink, we see you as all knowing and want reassurance but I had a LOL moment.

    “Blink – is this girl going to WALK?”

    “Yes, in shackles.
    B”

    I had a flash image in my head of Zoltar spitting out a little white paper.

    You people are going to turn me into a raging alcoholic, lol.

    Kidding, Lee on the stand, refused to meet with prosecutors but met with Baez.
    B

  5. Karen says:

    Somebody lied in a sworn depo. George swore he saw them leave that day @ around 12-1. Those sliding glass doors are difficult for an adult to open especially the older ones like in the A home. Can’t see a 2 year old doing it. If you have a slider, sit on the floor, reach up and try to open that door.

  6. Riverpearl says:

    The problem w/ “barring the Anthony’s from court room” —
    they can watch the proceedings from their TV -or- 1 of those “all access” computers in their home …

    AJMO

  7. Riverpearl says:

    Oh, the STATE JA is crossing LeeA …

  8. nana2 says:

    @ Karen says:
    June 24, 2011 at 1:00 pm

    Somebody lied in a sworn depo

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Everyone probably lied in the sworn depo’s IMO

  9. Eloise says:

    The blocking syndrome.

  10. Charlotte says:

    Blink: I hae to keep bugging you and I know you keep saying wait for the rebuttal – but I have to tell you I am starting to worry. I do not think the jury is going to vote guilty. This girl IS going to get away with murder! Your thoughts of reassurement???? Please????

    Charlotte, with much respect, your not reading all the comments are you?

    That is my request of readers please.
    B

  11. nana2 says:

    All that time on the stand for Lee & Baez never asked him the most important question of the day “did you touch your sister inappropriately” to support his opening statement..

    He can’t, not relevant to anything she is charged with. Another bonehead move as we knew at the opening argument.

    B

  12. WPG says:

    Charlotte says:
    June 24, 2011 at 12:24 pm
    “I remember that George Anthony said in one of his conversations with the police that the stain WAS NOT in the car trunk. He is the one that took care of the cars and he would know. This is most definately a ploy to cover for Casey. Does anyone else remember George talking about that stain?????”

    Yes, he even went as far to say the stain was about the size of a basketball but irregular in shape, and that he stuck his nose down into the stain and that’s where the odour (that he said was human decomposition because he has smelled that odour before in his LE days) was concentrated.

  13. cherylz says:

    I have followed this case from day 1. I still don’t know (can’t remember) if the word “chlorophyll” was entered in to the comp. search engine on 3/17 or 3/21. Did Pros. ever ask the computer guy? If it wasn’t entered…BINGO! Does anyone know? TIA!

  14. Riverpearl says:

    Well, LeeA has “total recall” from jb
    but “has difficulty answering JA’s Q’s”…

    LeeA’s “answers today to JA were NOT what he said in sworn depo” …
    Yup, he is “changin’ his statements” ….

    IMO IF anyone is “still wondering, the Anthony’s have circled the wagons & are doing whatever they can to see that ICA is found innocence” …

    Also, there was NO Q from jb to LeeA about “sex abuse by father or Lee” ….
    nor did jb ask about ICA ph calls/texts/emails to Lee …

    Jury on “break since jb ‘s next witness in bathroom” ….

    AMO

  15. Riverpearl says:

    should of been “found innocent” -not- “innocence”
    sheesh …

    thanks

  16. WPG says:

    Casey Anthony is NOT GOING TO WALK ANYWHERE EXCEPT PRISON.

    While I am ready to jump out of my skin over all the lies coming out of the mouth of the liars, I try to keep in mind the rebuttal of the State that is coming up.

    Also want to say that although I personally have believed for the past almost 3 years the Ant’s to be liars and expected them to lie under oath with an attitude to boost, hearing the lies and watching the Ant’s in court still makes me sick, disgusted, angry and ready to jump out of my skin.

    CMA . . . CMA . . . I will keep my promise . . .

    What the H is that in regards to? Does it mean he’ll be there for her like she was for him?

  17. Mom3.0 says:

    Blink get updates thanks- glad to know you are mottering, engine started but in nuetral.

    Everybody- great posts thanks for keepong us updated when we are unable to watch…I am so glad I am not alone- in my feelings & thoughts..

    I missed most of Cindys testimony- but did watch part 1 on WFTV-

    Does anyone recall seeing those tennis shoes among Caylees shoes in the closet? Just something that is bothering me.

    Also, The Fathers Day vid- with GG-Pa shows Caylee as a tiny little girl- not a huge “child” as Baez said- Those shorts are a big deal to them- but to any one that has children- they know that baies fluctuate and especially between diapers adding bulkiness to big girl pullups that are thinner…

    As for Lee-

    Proven he is a liar and is biased-

    Essentially Ashton blew away his testimony with 2 things

    He refused to meet with prosecutors but met with Baez. AND

    His New better recall- with the defense- and his non recall with the State- That will stick with the jury.

    AJMO

  18. Riverpearl says:

    Well guess who is next ???
    Mother CA is on the stand answering Q’s about baby shower …
    and w/those Q’s CA is already “weepy” …

    So, here we go again …

  19. mikki says:

    Ha — was just typing a comment when a typo appeared. CON-dy. Not Cindy — Condy. Spindy is better (from another poster, like that one)… but CONdy struck me as funny.

    She’s back on again. I must tell you, and sorry to repeat here, but I seriously can’t take more of this woman’s lies. I know this fact must not be lost on the jury. BUT… I’m interested in Blink’s comments that JB is planning on everyone knowing Cindy is lying. Hmmm…. This whole thing disgusts me greatly.

    Can NOT wait for the rebuttal case!

  20. josie says:

    Christyjoe says:
    “Oops, they did it again”!I hope the family realizes how frightening it would be if they had Casey home again. What a nightmare. I understand that they don’t want her to be on death row, but what if their mis-information resulted in her acquittal. She would be pregnant again before they could turn around! The problem with enablers is that they go in denial and think “things will be different this time” without thinking their actions through to the end.I feel that they don’t need to actively help the prosecution but should feel justified to tell the truth. No harm in the truth. They will have to live with the fact that they lied, no matter what.
    IMO, If Casey was pregnant with Caylee and telling her parents that she was going to give it up for adoption,I totally understand that they kept the pregnancy private. Many people don’t celebrate that. I think they as her parents didn’t want anyone to know but once Casey said that she would keep the baby they spoke about it. They didn’t speak of the adoption plans again to protect Caylee. Also, IMO, Casey didn’t tell anyone she was pregnant until it was too late to get an abortion, she probably hid it until the 6th month. The other thing is that they probably didn’t want the Baby Daddy finding out and inferring with them,thus the deadly car accident. Just my thoughts…

  21. nana2 says:

    @ Riverpearl says:
    June 24, 2011 at 1:06 pm

    The problem w/ “barring the Anthony’s from court room” —
    they can watch the proceedings from their TV -or- 1 of those “all access” computers in their home

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    That would apply to all of the witnesses in this case & all were instructed not to talk to other witnesses etc about the case.. Which is why Dr Spitz giving the TV interviews just prior to his testimony was quite interesting..

  22. justice23 says:

    Is this the precedent Caylee’s trial is setting for some? I say an eye for an eye … if she gets off, there will be more of it, I’m sure. I’m really sick of this BS.

    OH couple accused of duct-taping woman’s 3-year-old daughter, recording it on cell phone

    http://www.fox8.com/news/sns-ap-oh–childduct-taped,0,4953217.story?%3F

  23. justice23 says:

    Anthony family motto:

    Pleasing everyone is impossible but pissing everyone off is a piece of cake.

    lol
    B

  24. Blink says:

    WOOT WOOT.

    Fraud use of credit cards IS IN!!

    Cheney Mason, a 30 year atty, what a flipping blunder!

    wow

  25. mikki says:

    Mason made this blunder? WOW! I didn’t get to watch. I am missing a lot today – thanks for all of the updates!

    QUESTION: Is this blunder by Mason similar to the oner earlier that opened the door for the State to bring in her prior convictions? In that one, JP warned the State that they may not want to take advantage of that open door because once a bell is rung it cannot be un-rung. It would open the case to appeal on that issue because JB is such an idiot and that evidence is too prejudicial for Casey.

    SO…. is this not similar? In other words, this is not a big issue to worry about upon appeal in the way bringing in all her prior felony convictions would be?

    TIA!

  26. Columbiares (Pam) says:

    Agreed Blink…I thought huh?? I had to bounce back between agenda and bonehead move…I stayed with bonehead move. Man o man o man. I guess I never saw Karma in action so nicely!

  27. Columbiares (Pam) says:

    I think CM was going for the “they were picking on the poor whittle KC who’s 8″ shorter when the jury is in the house” move, but it ahhh, backfired a bit.

  28. Ragdoll says:

    I JUST JUST heard about credit cards. I literally sprinted to my comp to see what BOC was saying.

    HOLY COW!!!! Anyone catch Casey’s expression…or the jury’s reaction for that matter????

  29. Eloise says:

    Yes, but LDB looks none too happy. ??

  30. nana2 says:

    @Columbiares (Pam) says:
    June 24, 2011 at 2:44 pm

    I think CM was going for the “they were picking on the poor whittle KC who’s 8″ shorter when the jury is in the house” move, but it ahhh, backfired a bit
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    I think if you watch Casey she pumps her chair down & slumps in her chair to make herself appear smaller at the table for the benefit of the jury which I’m sure was an attorney instruction. She also will sit next to people that appear to be larger than her like CM & JB for the same reason..

  31. Eloise says:

    I wonder how purposeful this blunder by Mason was? They get into the testimony that Cindy had wanted charges against her daughter for theft, but here she is now, up on the stand being ‘truthful’ about what are everyday mundane topics like shorts etc. Might make me, a juror think, well it’s not that this mother wouldn’t speak up if she needed too ie call the police), she must be being truthful in regards to the present statements. I don’t know if I have conveyed this right, but I didn’t get the fuzzy on how this played out. Why is that?

    I am 100% with ya, but I think it was a Mason only “Pete Rose” if you will.

    B

  32. Charlotte says:

    Blink: I hae to keep bugging you and I know you keep saying wait for the rebuttal – but I have to tell you I am starting to worry. I do not think the jury is going to vote guilty. This girl IS going to get away with murder! Your thoughts of reassurement???? Please????

    Charlotte, with much respect, your not reading all the comments are you?

    That is my request of readers please.
    B

    In answer to your question Blinkk – yes I have read every post ever made about this case but I was referring to the testimony of Cindy and Lee that transpired after you answered the question that in light of the answers and where the testimony was leading – if you still felt what you had previously said (a few posts up). Was just looking for a reassurance that you were still convinced of what you had previously stated. We are all anxious here about this and are always looking for your expert opinions, that’s all. Sorry if it was asked too many times.

  33. Eloise says:

    But I do think Mason is senile. :)

  34. Eloise says:

    JP is being tough on our lady Linda today.

  35. TellMeItsNotTrue says:

    Couldn’t take it. Took Daughter and Granddaughter to pool and husband to late lunch. I appreciate all the brave Blinks that watched today’s court proceedings. Now that my blood pressure is at a normal level, I’m watching again. I’m sorry but Lee is such a dog. I didn’t have my brothers at my deliveries. Creepy. In fact, my parents weren’t there. This is not a spectator sport. Finally, caught up reading posts about today’s BS. And appreciate all comments and especially, Blink, for keeping us all informed in a calm manner.

  36. Columbiares (Pam) says:

    Nana- I haven’t seen that, but wondered just what the heck because sometimes she seemed taller than others. Uggg…like someone her size couldn’t kill a toddler. It might work if the victim was Hulk Hogan, but not a toddler. Thanks Nana, I’m going to watch when she walks in and such now. I use that time to powder the nose and such. Sneeky, huh?

  37. Sunshine says:

    I have a question about the picture of Caylee at the sliding door trying to open it. Wouldn’t the state already have been aware that the defense was going to use that picture, and had already examined it to see if it could have been her? It’s so obvious that it doesn’t look like a 2 year old child so I’m sure if they had seen it they would have looked into it already. If this was the first time they saw it is it too late for them to further investigate the photo? hopefully my questions makes some sense, sorry if it was confusing!

  38. NaNa says:

    Im sure the jury is wondering ‘what in the world is defense trying to prove?” You cant make any sense out of all the people called to testify about fragments of testimony and fragmented statements.

    And how does this prove drowing? Or any of the other accusations you made in your opening statement Mr Baez?

  39. nana2 says:

    @Columbiares (Pam)

    My guess is its done to give the impression Casey is a little girl too & please take pity on her.. More of a ‘she needs someone to protect her’ thing as opposed to a person small in stature can’t kill anyone.. UGH

  40. Columbiares (Pam) says:

    I just don’t get it sometimes. I don’t understand why the DT are asking questions they ask. I guess I’m too dense to figure out just what the heck kind of defense they’re trying to use. They want us the think she drowned by accident and then in the next breath they are bringing up the duct tape. They want Lee to lie and then they want to show he’s telling the truth- the same with Cindy. Uggg..my hubby says they’re trying to poke hole or show doubt, but that’s not what I’m seeing- I’m seeing a bipolar defense. Anyone else? It’s nuts.

  41. Eloise says:

    So the Queen has given her go ahead to file against Ashton? See that when he said go ahead and bring it on? She looks like an old lady. I can’t wait.

  42. Columbiares (Pam) says:

    Bring it on Beaz…did you see him cower next to Jeff Ashton!!! Do not mess with a good man, you smarmy weasel..you will lose every single time!!!

  43. WPG says:

    Blink says:
    June 24, 2011 at 2:35 pm
    “WOOT WOOT.

    Fraud use of credit cards IS IN!!

    Cheney Mason, a 30 year atty, what a flipping blunder!

    wow”

    ACCCKKKKKK!!!!
    Had to leave for appointment just as that came out of the officer’s sweet lips!
    Wow is right! Thanks for posting Blink!

    Got back to hear these flippers want to go after the State, Dr.R and the DOD!
    The DOD!!!!

  44. jane says:

    Please Blink explain to me what is wrong with Lee and why was he so hysterical today

    I really do not understand it

    Someone please explain

  45. WPG says:

    Ragdoll says:
    June 24, 2011 at 2:45 pm
    “I JUST JUST heard about credit cards. I literally sprinted to my comp to see what BOC was saying.
    “HOLY COW!!!! Anyone catch Casey’s expression…or the jury’s reaction for that matter????”

    :) Ragdoll, you have me laughing! :)

    Will have to go find video with C’s reaction on it.

  46. Jeez! says:

    This entire family deserve the Hell their life will be , even if Casey goes free. Some say “Life isn’t always fair”, but the hatred felt for these people will keep them locked up in their own kind of prison, one that will never allow them to walk freely anywhere.. Actually Prison, may be the only safe place for Casey. Who of us would want their life after this trial. For as angry as this entire trial makes me, I know it is out of my hands. The jurors are the only ones to make the final judgement, and God Help Them!

  47. Fiona says:

    Billowing blustering little man show. Rumplestiltskin, had his feelings hurt when he learned his witness’s boss called Mr Ashton. He perceives that everyone is duplicitous like himself. Once again, he heard a few facts, twisted to his liking and whined to the judge.

    My head is full and spinning from all the lies, side bars, objections, bad acting/crying, the Anthonys. How in the world can the jury keep track of this mess and make a decision?

    Thank you Blink for your wonderful assuring informative articles and posts. BOC is like coming to a beautiful Isle after spending the day in a snake pit (the court room). Thank you all for the insightful posts and links. I am Boomer “old” and have not learned to post links and such.

  48. A Texas Grandfather says:

    I didn’t get to watch much of todays activities. Did manage to get the major questions of the defense team from Judge Perry about where in the world are you people going. You are not following your opening statement, have you changed direction? (Paraphrased)

    And the end of Cindy’s testimony where LDB reminded her that the testimony she gave today differed from that in deposition. Cindy seemed unfazed and blathered on.

    The one thing that all of us must concentrate on is not getting impatient during this part of the trial. The defense team is being called brilliant by some of the talking heads on TV. This is just TV nonsense.

    Mr. Baez is stumbling through this case. I don’t believe I ever witnessed a case where more side-bars occured or more objections were raised or more teaching was done by the judge and the prosecution’s attorneys.

    I hope the state in its rebuttal case can produce the time sheets for Cindy as well as having her supervisor or manager as a witness. It is time that all of the Anthony’s are proven to be liars and have purgered themselves in their testimony.

  49. osu says:

    Maybe it is just me but I have never seen Casey cry real tears like she did when Lee was on the stand crying! VERY ODD! Now I am totally convinced that that family is twisted. She didn’t even cry like that when her baby was “missing”. Makes the defense theory of incest more believable. Did they think maybe the baby could have been Lee’s? CMA, whatever. I may sound harsh but I hope the entire family goes down at this point.

  50. MsEnscene says:

    39.Columbiares (Pam) says:
    June 24, 2011 at 4:06 pm
    I just don’t get it sometimes. I don’t understand why the DT are asking questions they ask. I guess I’m too dense to figure out just what the heck kind of defense they’re trying to use. They want us the think she drowned by accident and then in the next breath they are bringing up the duct tape. They want Lee to lie and then they want to show he’s telling the truth- the same with Cindy. Uggg..my hubby says they’re trying to poke hole or show doubt, but that’s not what I’m seeing- I’m seeing a bipolar defense. Anyone else? It’s nuts.

    ______________________________________________________________________Pam, I don’t even see what the big deal about the car is. If Caylee died in the pool, why is negating all the car evidence (stains, etc.) so important? Some one would have had to deposit the body somewhere by some vehicle, I presume. They’ve already said George had keys to Casey’s car.

    And as we know, ahem, Roy Kronk moved the body
    from wherever…and deposited it the teash dump close to home (Holt?)

    What I want to know is why, if your dear granddaughter died from accidental drowning, no matter who was supposed to be watching her, you put strips of duct tape over her mouth to suggest….what? Kidnapping? Why would a grandfather, totally innocent of killing the child, want to make an accident look like a kidnapping?

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment