Caylee/Casey Anthony Case: 3D Virtual Juror Exclusive- Tour for Yourself
Orlando, FL– While the countdown begins for upcoming motions in both the criminal and civil cases against notorious tot mom Casey Anthony for the murder of her daughter, Caylee, a blinkoncrime.com exclusive:
An Interactive Tour of the crime scene off Suburban Drive, the autopsy area and digital DNA lab, and the Anthony home where most believe is where 34 month old Caylee Marie Anthony sadly met her end.
Built by a colleague at my request, Angela Talamasca and her team have recreated an interactive simulation that undoubtedly will be used by both the State’s Attorneys and Jose Baez Defense Team.
It is designed to provide a virtual experience allowing the final “triers of fact” to literally transport themselves within the evidence and theories they will be presented to consider when determining the fate of the accused, Casey Anthony. This proof of concept ”build” includes contribution and consult from leaders in the fields of: Forensics, CSI, Crime Scene Reconstruction and Medical Examiners Investigations.
Currently, we have closed the simulation “island” to the public while it continues development to reflect known evidence and elements of the case.
We got a glimpse of the 3D “view” released in the discovery of 
a flyover of the area where Caylee Anthony’s remains were found. In the second life version (think Wii sims for adults) site called Digital DNA, users will be able to “virtually” tour the scenes by walking through them and simultaneously interacting with the features that will hilight the components and evidence of the case.
Take the Museum tour, interactive crime scene case review, test out your own theories “real time” or disprove someone else’s; it’s here.
(editors note: out of respect for Caylee’s age, we have used a larger than scale anthropologic presentation)
Related Posts
Related Posts:
306 Comments
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
Blink, this is an amazing tool to demonstrate what happened to Caylee. I found the end with pink dots all over the site where her remains were found to be very disturbing. That beautiful baby was strewn all over hell’s half acre. Death to the guilty for this atrocity.
#34 mjh and Blink-
Thank you for making this point.
There is much that can be done.
Check to see if there are local organizations already in place where you reside.
Many, such as this one, http://www.advokid.org/home.asp accept volunteer assistance not just from attorneys, but from all who can be of assistance.
You may not just be helping to save a child. You may be helping to save other people from being the victims of crimes in the future.
There are many other avenues to help if this type of work doesn’t suit you.
http://www.abanet.org/litigation/committees/childrights/
Silverspoon – Another aspect of the trial itself will be Casey’s demenor as perceived by the jury. I’m sure the defense will try to instruct Casey how to “act”, but she is probably no more teachable than her mother. The jury will be watching her as evidence is presented, and how she reacts – or doesn’t react – will become a major point with individual jurors. This real time picture of Casey Anthony will give weight to the recordings and her flat aspect at the time of the disappearance.
Its been said Casey isnt very bright, but I dont think she is dumb either so I just cannot understand her getting that tattoo after Caylee was gone. What in the world possessed her? They say sociopaths dont have anxiety. All that time that after she killed Caylee, she went about her activies, shopping, dancing, hanging out with Tony and her friends as if she didnt have a care in the world. It was like it never occurred to her that she would have to explain Caylees disappearance yet her parents and brother were constantly in contact with her demanding she bring Caylee home. Can anyone explain a mindset like this? I know what the prosecution can make out of it, but what can the defense say to explain such behavior? I sometimes wonder if these types of individuals dont have a subconcious desire to confess
causing them to leave “clues” to their crimes. Casey’s tattooing of Bella Vida on her shoulder to me is tatamount to a confession.
silverspur
I couldnt of said it better about caseys affect. I agree that it is going to be tough for the defense to portray her as a caring mother. also what bothers me is when casey told said to her friend after the comment you posted with her friend saying I will die if something happends to casey
casey said omg calling this a huge waste.
unbelievable! thanks spur for putting like I wasnt able to do!!also recalling when george and cindy went to the jail to visit and cindy was crying! casey says
dad why is mom crying
why!! duh she was upset over caylee but casey couldnt comprehend those feelings. she was not attached to her little girl.
p.s
and it annoyed her to see her crying.
Digital DNA/Autopsy– thanks silverspnr!!
There will be strict ‘rules of evidence’ that will apply to these types of powerful visual concepts, won’t there?
For example, this is based on ‘reality’ of the facts and can be used that way as this obviously.
But what if Casey should decide to postulate (concoct) some ideas (even visualize a ‘kidnapper’ in some threatening/ominous way, and show that visuallyto the jury? That would be a powerful bell to ‘unring’ once seen. Would the judge require visuals like this from the ‘defense’ be reviewed prior to coming into ‘evidence’ or would that just be up to the state to object when they see it?
Given the defense’s past ‘trust us, we’ll do the investigation and give it to you’ ideas, let out client out of jail to secretly go look for Caylee’ demands, they could see a grand opportunity to give visuals to the jury that are pure speculation in a way that is powerful and even emotional/frightening kidnap or home entry type scenarios.
#43, Silver: Thank you for your eloquent post. The biggest indicator of Casey’s guilt, as I see it, is her extraordinarily flat affect (or complete lack thereof) throughout this whole ordeal. That, coupled with the facts of Casey not contacting authorities or telling ANYONE that her baby was “missing” and her party-hearty ways during the month before Cindy corralled her (and spoiled everything)will be insurmountable to the defense.
It matters not what physical evidence there is to refute, what scientific data are contested by highly paid experts, if I were sitting on that jury, I could never, ever get past those three points: No or flat affect; not reporting her baby missing (not a single outcry witness); and her nights of fun at Fusian. No one could ever convince me this woman did not kill or cause the death of her own child.
Oh ~ and that tattoo is not going to be a cinch for the defense to explain away, either. There are only two reasons for Casey getting a tattoo that proclaims “the beautiful life”: either Casey was now living the beautiful life because she was free to do what she pleased, or Caylee’s life was beautiful (while it lasted), & this was a commemoration of that life. Neither interpretation serves Casey well.
I’d expect the defense to go after one of Dr. G.’s ‘truths’ in the evidence and that is the ‘nuclear DNA’ conclusion from ‘known source’ for Caylee. Cindy did her best to give investigators, what was not optimum for Caylee’s source DNA, as they would have to sort out other persons hairs to find ones that were consistent with hair from a child and not an adult, hairs that were not consistent with an adult who may have had chemical treatments. But still, the source was not just for Caylee. They will make a big deal of ‘the source’ as proof that the body was Caylee’s and then Cindy wanted the cremation, which was against Casey’s stated wishes in her public statement via’z Baez.
When a family does so much to NOT want a body identified 100%, by doing what they have done, vs a family who gives as much open assistance to forensics to identify ‘their family member and only their family member’, you have to wonder if there is going to be a fight over the child’s ID to discredit LE minimally, and to but a “?” to the baby’s identity for ‘doubt’, however small.
There is no father identified, if that is the same at trial, then there is unknown DNA profile for Caylee other than by exclusion of the other family members. It’s clear this was Caylee, I’d trust that. But muddying and befuddling and confusing to get jury’s heads spinning to where they can’t tell the difference between ‘outgoing and incoming texts’ or see a jar of mayo staring them top shelf fridge, won’t they try just for ‘muddle-sake’?
Would be so much simpler if the paternal component of Caylee’s DNA could be conclusively identified. (another reason to know ‘the father’)
I, too, hope that anger at the Anthonys does not cause anyone to miss the larger picture. Violence against children is at epidemic levels. There are things we, as individuals and as a society, can and must do to address it.
Having said that, however, I think it is important –for justice in this particular case– for people to keep in mind what they are really dealing with when it comes to the Anthonys. (I am hoping that the other larger picture of the opportunistic scam artists who take advantage of such tragedies is coming to light).
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/media/acrobat/2008-11/43322348.pdf
Carolyn S-
Agreed. And they can coach her all they like. They cannot erase the (self-incriminating) statements Casey made early on in the investigation.
I was so enthralled and excited about the technology of the Interactive Tour, that it caught me off guard when tears started to fall as I viewed the “autopsy” portion. You were so respectful to Caylee when you did an enlarged version…however, and quite unexpectedly, my mind immediately saw Caylee….missing bones…a little hair…dirty….Oh God! I suddenly remembered that technology can also make you cry. I am so proud of your team Blink, and thankful to have found this site so many months ago!
On another note, I have always had a question (just taken me awhile to find the statement). The day the Grand Jury convened, George Anthony said a few things to the media before entering the courtroom. This was in part, one of this statements:
He asked for the public to keep his family, especially Caylee, in their prayers. “If someone could take a moment out at 11 o’clock this morning and 11 o’clock tonight and just pray for her. That’s all I’m asking for. That’s all I can say.”
It had hounded me for a very long time about the relevance of “11:00″. Has this statement made by George, ever been discussed?
One thing I was thinking about, is when LE first asked Casey who had Caylee, and her response was Zenaida Fernandez Gonzalez. How many people, when asking about someone else, proceeds to give the entire name? Instead of just Joe Smith, it’s Joe Wally Smith. I wonder what the intent was to give an overly amount of the “normal”, procedurial information
Thank you, Blink.
I love these take-you-to-the-scene videos (both real and animated) and appreciate the time and effort put into creating the one you linked to. I can’t wait for the interactive program.
As I look at the “Overhead View” .jpg and follow the landmarks, it appears to me that the three islands, from right to left, are the Anthony residence (right island), the Suburban wooded lot where Caylee’s remains were left (middle island), and Lee’s old house on Eagle Feather Drive (left island). There’s no house pictured on the island platform, but the projection cone terminates in the subdivision where Eagle Feather Drive is located.
Amiright?
#47 wpgmouse–
The third island is the dna lab…hopefully this is an indication that the duct tape/caylee’s body/other evidence found at the scene(s) will implicate Casey beyond doubt!
Wow, that is one spooky but impressive tool you guys have constructed, Blink! Are we still going to see the 3D duct tape and all that?
The ductape short of having actual measurements from Dr. G, is “scale” in proportion. When we started, we knew immediately there was no way we wanted to depict the remains of a child on that autopsy table. Even though that is the reality, it is and was never our intent to have shock value or be exploitive in any way; it was to educate and allow the gravity of the scene to be experienced as best one can remotely.
I can assure everyone that all of us would rather be doing anything rather than painstakingly match the bones recovered, scale them, lay them out as they were- If your asking if when completed will someone be able to move things like that, no. There will be fixed elements of course.
B
What Pi$$e$ me off even more is that these monsters will, as they already have, make money off of the murder of their grand baby. The vultures are perched and ready…
******Caylee, I cannot thank you enough for making me a better mom. You deserved so much more than they gave you.
May you Rest in Peace little one.
My God I sit and read all these post from all over, me myself in Europe, and wonder where, who, when will someone other than complete strangers stand with this child? Thank God for all of you who seek justice for this child….
someone anyone I see some of you use this in your comments LLRC what does it mean?
#55 Todd
listened to that 911 call today and ole Casey had no emotion not a lick, I am in tears when I don’t speak to my girls each day and they are 23 and 20….WTH she sounds like she doesn’t have a care in the world that is what makes me sick. She was more angry and upset about getting Tony’s # then about her own child being “kidnapped”
Silver, Thank you for the links. I have looked at them both, and will continue to research in my area for similar associations.
I also believe we need to have stricter laws and punishments for child abusers/molesters,sex offenders and domestic violence. If some of these child predators were kept in jail, like they should be, a lot of children’s lives would also be saved.
Also, things like little boys being placed in the hands of their “mother” after she has fractured her infant’s skull are beyond me. And, mother’s of beautiful little girls allowing child molester’s into their lives and homes.
Since child molesters and sex offenders cannot be rehabilitated, we need to keep them locked up and away from our children. It costs us too much to keep them there? Then, how about the death penalty — because we already know they will probably kill their next victim. I would rather pay to keep these “people” in prison than to have to pay for my childs funeral.
I’m sorry to go on and on, I just get very angry when it comes to innocent children who never had a chance because we as a society do not protect them well enough.
In Casey Anthony’s case, I believe she needed help a long time ago. I don’t think you can live with a sociopath for that many years and not realize that there is something wrong. I’m sure her parents never thought it would come to what it did. But, they had to have known that she had problems, and they neglected to do anything about it.
We need to educate people about “personality disorders”, too. Most people are unaware of what a sociopath really is. They do not realize that people with these disorders are living among us. They are our neighbors, our co-workers, people we meet every day….sometimes people we live with. Sometimes, our own children.
Maybe this case will make people more aware of this, too.
I thought i had missed out on the interactive part too. i dont think there has ever been a case like this with all you blinksters around. was there a site like this when oj simpson was being tried?
also from all the talk on this site, do most people feel it will go to trial or do you think she will take a plea
#61 are you F’n serious??? man you guys are good I wish I had half the time to find this stuff…thanks I am even madder then before…
Blink…how on earth is this legal????? I know it is illegal for a person convicted of a crime to profit, but, do you ever think it will be illegal for people like the A’s to do what they are doing???
Maybe God willing, this case will open the eyes of many (law makers) and stop the abuse of a crime victims, especially an innocent 3 year old child
Dee, #70, you are exactly right. Casey DID care more about getting Tony’s phone number than about her own child. (I think she wanted to talk to Tony so she could whine about what a victim she was. After all, she was in jail. Oh, no ~ her whole life could be taken away! Doesn’t anyone care about Casey?)
In Casey’s own words (paraphrasing here): “All anyone cares about right now is Caylee.” Poor, poor Casey. It seems some people didn’t know Casey is the center of the universe.
In the trailer, the 911 call excerpts start with the first call that I quoted in an earlier post– I think blink chose this section of solely conversation between Cindy and Casey for a reason, not just because it was the first call– there is much else in this call she could have used. But it goes directly to Cindy’s knowledge of Casey’s responsibility as the ‘wonderful, mother of the year, never concerns with Caylee being away, never prior concerns about Casey’s level of responsibility generally, as portrayed by Cindy later in interview after interview after interview (LE, FBI, Larry King and other national talk events, local media) and her position of not being concerned at all about Caylee because ‘someone’ was the nanny/babysitter and that quote ‘Caylee belonged to Casey’ implying Cindy had no rights or reasons to be concerned.
This was Cindy’s position with Casey– she had been concerned afterall, concerned enough to go to child protection services to get a court order with no prior reasons for concern???? This statement by Cindy was probably the most truthful we have ever heard come from her mouth, as that phone was ringing before OSCO picked up.
24 wpgmouse
I didn’t realize you had already guessed Lee’s old house. We arrived at that conclusion independently. I pulled up Google maps for 9051 Suburban Drive (Hidden Oaks Elementary) and used that as the anchor landmark. The third island is currently being projected out of the Eagle Feather Drive neighborhood. Maybe that location was randomly picked as a place-holder for the as-yet-unnamed third island, but the current location of the third island in the “Overhead map” is definitely Lee’s old neighborhood.
What gives, Blink? Is Lee’s old house going to play a role in this simulation or not?
Chica, I believe it is IIRC = “If I Recall Correctly”.
It’s often interesting to listen to the interviews after not hearing them for months, like the Crime Scene Recreation link here.
What I noticed this time was when the 911 dispatcher asked Casey, “Can you tell me a little bit about this” Casey’s reply was, “I’m sorry?” as if she hadn’t heard. That’s one “tell” of a liar. When they need extra time to think about the details they will often ask a question just to buy them a few seconds. Very common.
Secondly, I’m sure this has been noted before, but it’s the first time it occured to me. Maybe Casey is speaking the truth when she says, “The ONLY WAY they’re going to find Caylee is if they ACTUALLY LISTEN to what I’m SAYING. I’m trying to HELP THEM and they’re not letting me help them!”
silverspnr, about the suggestion of some previously undiagnosed medical condition to explain Casey’s behaviour– what about some abnormality caused by cell phone use? Remember Johnny Cochrane? His self-stated behaviour of memory problems before he knew he had a brain tumour? I bet the defense will do a full work up on Casey physically, including anything that might point to abnormalities in the brain, such as a tumour. (one of the original Law & Order series touched on this, where a young male killer was sentenced to death, NOT by the legal system, but by the physician who was doing medical studies that included this young male and he did not do the pre-requisite exclusion tests, instead, because the young male subject showed benefit from the treatment for his psychological problems, he became a poster child for the therapy– $$$$’s and reputation for the doctor. The young male patient did not benefit from the therapy, he just did NOT have the psychiatric disorder in the first place– a brain tumour had not been excluded before the trials began. It was only later, that the prosecution keyed in on this fact, that tests were done, the tumour found, but now too late for the young man, whose cancer was at this point in the story, terminal.
Not only did this doctor in the storyline fail the patient, fail the trials by misrepresentation of success, he failed those who this young man had killed– a truly innocent person was this ‘killer’.
This is fiction of course and those with cancer don’t become ‘killers’, Johnny Cochrane did not, they may become confused temporarily, or drop things, then then back to normal or other symptoms, that could be confused with things like epilepsy– back to the 911 call by Jesse.
Maura, on the ‘third island’, I suspect that it is just a ‘placeholder’ to tell us there is more, perhaps every location for the persons involved with Casey during this time period, will be ‘on the map’ and this was included as significant because all three family members are introduced in the trailer. The DNA investigations would include Lee, of course, and that may be the reason for this particular placeholder in the trailer– to include the whole nuclear/biological family.
As much as we wonder about the psychology of Casey and her parents – what made Casey become a narcissistic sociopath, what makes Geo and Cindy go to extraordinary lengths to deny, cover and defend a daughter that harmed the granddaughter that they loved so much, etc . . .
I am now wondering about the psychology of the high-level attorneys, pathologists, experts who are willing to put their years of training, experience and reputations ‘out there’ for a woman who is obviously guilty? A lot of people who make it to the top of their professions are narcissistic and have unique traits as well that set them apart (good or bad) from the rest of us (professional athletes, fighter pilots, politicians, actors and so many more).
Do they identify with Casey? Looking for some enlightenment within themselves?
Is it the publicity and attention?
Is it the money from the book deal they are surely negotiating?
Is it the lifelong association with a notorious ‘trial of the time’?
Is it curiosity?
I mean, I can figure Baez out. He’s simple enough. But the rest of them?
Some things
I meant to finish – Some things make you go ‘huh?’
Of course, if the defense is claiming ‘she is innocent’, then they better have done exclusion tests for physical causes such as cancer already or by the time trial rolls around, they may not have a client. Then the family could sue them for not bringing this secret strategy of ‘innocence’ to someone to have the tests done so that the client does not die from the ‘medical condition’, or at least, can be treated in time.
Duh– they haven’t thought of this, or they don’t consider it to have a purpose. (Baez is no neurologist though, nor is Lyon, nor is Macaluso, the ping professional). They could do the work-ups without making it seem as if they are looking for an explanation for guilt, just explanation for changes in behaviour, or ‘flat’ non-emotional behaviour as they did with the ‘ugly copying’ idea.
Motivation for the Anthony’s is plain and simple… The almighty dollar, IMO. They figured out early that Casey killed Caylee but and i keep harping on it….. There is no money in a grand daughter that is murdered by their daughter but there is big money in a “missing” child. Once the money started pouring in (early on) to help with the search for Caylee… remember Cindy bragging to Casey in one jailhouse tape about having raised $250k so far and Casey responded in her typical narcissistic fashion that it was half her bail money….
So the A’s get on tv and try to hide behind supporting their daughter while their real motivation is much simpler….
Dee, I get all carried away and worried about the big name lawyers too but then I’m reminded that they may have recognizable names but they sure don’t have much in the way of GOOD REPUTATIONS. Far from it.
Andrea Lyons knowingly let an INNOCENT person sit in jail for TWENTY-FOUR YEARS, so that’s a HUGE STRIKE against her. She may get the DP removed but that may be all she can do in this case (as in most of her previous cases).
Jose Baez took EIGHT YEARS to get accepted by the Bar as he was FINANCIALLY and MORALY IRRESPONSIBLE. Right now he is UNDER INVESTIGATION again.
Todd Macalouso was in trouble in California for STEALING MONEY from clients.
Linda Kenny Badan screwed up Phil Specter’s case and it wound up in another trial in which she was not his counsel and he got CONVICTED OF 2ND DEGREE MURDER.
Dr. Lee is from Specter and OJ and he TAMPERED with EVIDENCE and destroyed some in Specter’s case. He also instructed OJ not to take his arthritis meds so the glove wouldn’t fit.
Ooooops! Sorry, Dee. I meant to address my last comment to Lily.
Q to ask– Is what the members of the Casey defense legal team are doing, the best for the client, or the best for themselves? (Blink offers that Lyon is not in this particular defense, for her political agenda against the DP as this case does not forward that).
#69 Chica IIRC = If I Recall Correctly
BEES KNEES,
right on… this is a cast of dubious characters that make up the Defense Team..
I have not figured out their TRUE motivations for jumping on board this sinking ship… but Lyon has a book due out and is renowned for being anti-DP… Baden just released one and is the forensic expert. I think that Macaluso was brought on to argue against the release jailhouse video reaction tape. And Baez was just the only lawyer dumb enough to act like he believed Casey’s story…. but I ain’t telling you guys anything that you didn’t know already.
Still can not figure out their motivations for standing on the Courthouse steps and repeatedly stating that Casey is innocent…. all the while knowing that we the public have witnessed how their stories have morphed each time that more evidence is released….
Bees (say, nice to see you back!!)– and there’s the fact that people like Dr. LEE are ‘professional, paid, promoted ‘witnesses’ for a defense’. Being paid to take a position for one side as some ‘authority’ (aka EXPERT).
What is the definition of ‘EXPERT’ witness?? (someone who travels far from home and who has been on Nancy Grace more than once!! )
In Baez’s case I believe he has his own interests at heart and is advising her as to what will be best for him. I’m not sure about the others.
yep, Bees… agree
Although I believe Baez thinks he’s the next Johnny Cochran, it’s hard to call who has the other’s best interest in mind, Baez or Casey. Baez is probably milking the “not guilty” trail due to future job security, and Casey is using the “not guilty” angle, probably because she is such a sociopath, she has told herself she didn’t do anything “illegal”.
#76 Maura
I also did a google map comparison of the area of the visual showing the 3 projections. What I find particularly interesting about the visual showing Lee’s old neighbourhood, is that he was out of town in June 2008, thus perhaps Miss Anthony had the opportunity for access to his home/property during the critical time of events between June 15/16 thru to June 27. Maura, would Lee’s rented home on 4148 Eagle Feather drive fall within the same ping area of the Anthony’s home?
I guess Baez has nothin’ to lose and is doubling down on this one. the others are in a win-win no matter what the verdict. I wonder if Baez had to go searching these people out or if there were lines at the door from the so-called experts?
Is that why lee won’t disclose the name of caylee’s father? So the defense can say the remains of caylee are not 100% conclusive? What kind of sense does that make? What other small female child with similar DNA to caylee’s was missing at that time? NONE that’s who! WTH?
Casey:”the only way they’re going to find Caylee is if they start listening to me, they haven’t listened to a word I’ve been saying”. How pathetic is this? Casey, oh, yes they have been listening to you, AND ALL YOUR LIES! If they hadn’t been listening to every lying word you’ve told them, they wouldn’t have been led around Universal Studios, they wouldn’t have found out that the place where you claimed Caylee was babysat had been empty for 4 months. Maybe YOU should start listening to YOUR ridiculous lies, and actually come clean with something that is foreign to you…..THE TRUTH!
Baez sees himself as the next Johnny Cochran. No doubt he’s working on a catchy slogan right now. You know, a worthy successor to “If it doesn’t fit, you must acquit.”
Shall we help him, fellow Blinkers?
Thanks, Blink. You had mentioned showing us an “anatomical example of the duct tape placement” so I was just askin’.
Open comment to Cindy and George..
I am sure you are reading here..this is something that would really peak your interest. Good.
Listen..I have Grandchildren living with me..Cindy I could hear the anguish and terror in your voice on the 911 call. I would have been as upset as you. I would never want to be in your shoes.
I also understand why and how a grandparent would react to their grandchild being missing that lived with them. I also understand loving a child and trying to keep that love through the worst of situations. However that is where we part.
I would be able to still love my child if such a situation happened..I would not be able to lie for my child. Loving a child, such as Casey, does not mean that you ignore what they have done..it does not mean they do not deserve punishment for what they have done. It does, however mean, that you still love them..but not the deed they committed. It means you say I will support you, I will not lie, or cover up for you.
You and George and Lee did not like her choice of Baez as her lawyer. That was accurate in my opinion. He has used her, now you, as a way to wealth and fame. He will sell his story. The lawyers and expert witnesses he has brought on board to help are infamous..not famous.
Baden and Lee are not in the league of let’s get justice for Caylee.
Yes, Caylee is gone..I understand you do not want to lose Casey too. But even with the DP on the table..it is unlikely she will get more then life without parole..which even you must concede is the best result. Lyon was brought onboard to sell you on the idea she could keep Casey from the DP..not so..Casey probably will get LWOP. She jumped on board for her own agenda…against the DP in Florida..Casey will be used for Lyon’s agenda…which Florida will not get rid of the DP due to this particular case..ain’t gonna happen. So far Casey’s defense is using everyone for their own advancement and wealth. Have you asked yourself where Caylee and justice for her fits into this picture? I know Caylee isn’t here to help anylonger..and Casey is..but is the best result..Caylee having no dignity in death?
In the meantime..Caylee has been lost in all the fou fou and mistatements. Make a choice for Caylee…tell Casey you love her..but we need to speak the truth for Caylee..it isn’t too late.
Do what honors Caylee..tell the truth.