Casey/Caylee Anthony Case: Caylee Pic in The “Big Trouble” T- SOLD TO THE GLOBE BEFORE Remains Found?
Disclaimer– exclusive original content copyright and property of Internet Network News, LLC and Blinkoncrime.com. Reproduction of this article , ANY OF IT’S CONTENTS, in whole or in part without proper attribution and source link is strictly prohibited without prior written permission.
BREAKING NEWS
Orlando, Fl– In the recent depositions by the State Attorneys Office in the case against Casey Anthony one common exhibit was noted in each deposition of George, Lee and Cindy Anthony.
A cropped version of a photo of Caylee wearing the tshirt that is believed recovered with her remains.
All 3 Anthony’s claimed to not have seen this picture before previously, although without being prompted, Lee noted the photo was cropped.
How then, did it get in the hands of The Globe? Could this be the evidence removed from the Anthony home that Jose Baez tells Cindy Anthony to “Zip It” during her testimony and objects to information he considered sealed by the judge?
This edition of the Globe was released October 8, 2008. Six days before Casey Anthony was indicted for murder and remanded to jail without bond.
THE SALE OF THIS PHOTO PRE-DATES THE RECOVERY OF CAYLEE MARIE ANTHONY FROM THE WOODS OFF SUBURBAN DRIVE.
One could make the leap that the person selling it would have had knowledge of what she was wearing when 34 month old Caylee Marie met her tragic end.
(EDITORS NOTE: Don’t even try the picture was sold at the yardsale with the clothes and laundry bag– PUHLEASE..)
Blinkoncrime.com poster “Justice 23” contributed to this report.
Related Posts
Related Posts:
1,441 Comments
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
Haven’t read Blink’s article yet, but I can sure see the picture. At least we can have the relief that Caylee wasn’t snap shotted in the trunk.
I must be missing something. Why is this relevant? Even if this is the shirt Caylee was wearing when she was killed, she could have taken that picture at any time. It does not mean it was taken the same day. Someone in the family took the picture and it was lying around the house and taken as evidence. So what? It is a gigantic leap to infer it had to be taken the same day as she was killed. So please someone tell me what it is I am missing.
Nancy-
this photo was sold and published in the Globe in October 2008. The state has it’s original file, meaning it was “named” in October 2008, but obviously taken much, much earlier, prior to her going missing. This photo was not lying around taken as evidence, my bet would be the original file was subopoened from the Globe after Caylee was found. That photo was sold and chosen for a reason to be on the cover, make no mistake. Whoever sold that photo knew what she would be found in, if in fact, she ever was.
B
What. The. H.
Xactly, well said.
Kudos to Justice 23 again
B
Does anyone have any ideas as to who might be the photographer for this pic? Whoever that was, I’m sure, knows WAAAAAY more than they are saying! JMO
I don’t know how to post links so I copied this news from WFTV. It doesn’t have anything to do with the photo in this article, but info. on the check fraud case and at bottom of article how Dominic Casey is trying to get out of his depo in November! Here it is: ORANGE COUNTY, Fla. — A judge refused to throw out the defamation lawsuit against Casey Anthony, filed by Zenaida Gonzalez. Judge Rodriguez, Monday, (read order) denied her defense team’s motion to get Casey’s civil case dismissed.
READ: Judge’s Order Denying Motion
Gonzales shares the name as the mystery nanny that Casey says disappeared with her daughter Caylee. Casey’s civil attorney had argued that it was not fair for Casey to have to defend herself in the civil case, before going to trial for murder.
But the judge disagreed, ruling that since Zenaida’s lawyers backed off of demanding Casey answer very specific questions about the nanny, it would not hurt her defense in the murder trial.
The case against Casey will go back to court in December. A pre-trial hearing is scheduled in her check fraud case for December 18, with the trial set for January 25. Her defense team has asked that the trial be moved out of Orange County, but a judge has yet to rule on that.
In a hearing last week, (images) | (video) the defense won the right to have the photographs of Caylee’s remains copied on CDs, which they will send to their experts.
Casey Anthony is in jail facing murder charges in the death of her daughter, Caylee Marie Anthony.
ANTHONYS ‘ P.I. TRYING TO GET OUT OF DEPOSITION The Anthony family’s private investigator is trying to get out of his November 12 deposition under oath with prosecutors in Casey’s murder trial.
Private eye Dominic Casey, who was at the scene where Caylee’s remains were found, claims that since he worked for Casey’s defense team at one time, he can’t be forced to answer questions.
Part of the private investigator’s interview with law enforcement is still under seal, but part of it has been made public.
Well, I see at least I wasn’t wrong about the uncropped version of that photo being the source of contention during Cindy’s depo.
Maybe the Globe inserted the alien face to further another headline? (I jest.)
Blink,
Please define the “editores note.” I have such a headache. Sorry. But I didn’t understand the note.
AND GOOD JOB TO JUSTICE 23 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Justice, Blink
NICE WORK! How the hell did you come up with that?
Okay, to play devil’s advocate here:
1. Would Casey really want to sell a photo with a shirt that ended up being discovered with the remains? Sounds counter-productive. (But she has done so many incredible things believing she will never be caught). Otherwise, maybe they sold a bunch wholesale and of course, since George mentioned different clothing on “the last day”, perhaps they didn’t think it would be linked?
2. Lee Anthony, perhaps preemptively, mentions that the media was getting photos and posting them & that is why they deleted them.
Wow, if the defense, Casey or any of the Anthonys sold this photo, how sickly ironic?? Also, talk about selling to the lowest of bottom feeders; The globe!
Marinade Dave’s site is interesting but Blink…..you’re the BEST! Some very smart contributors here at Blink too. Justice23 thank you for clearing that up for me (what that full pic was). I was reading at Dave’s site and there was so much speculation it made my head hurt.
His site has contributors there that is not so ANTI-Anthony so it’s nice to go there and read and see how oblivious some people can be. Actually since Blink’s site is so into the FACTS of the evidence, I go there to so I can read some comical comments.
Dave was so honored to be called out by Judge Strickland, but it may cause him alot of grief too. He stands up for the Anthony’s and you see what has happened to most everyone that has been associated with that bunch.
Sorry for the long comment….
Thanks Blink for a great site!
Cover photo link from “Mark Pasetsky’s, COVER AWARDS The Media Industry’s Guilty Pleasure” site
http://coverawards.com/2008/10/08/news_globe_magazine_caylee_mom_47182/
justice23
kudos, to you
Wow, Blink … I was sitting there wondering why no one was posting back to me about the recent find but as I went to log off the page, I went to the main one and noticed the new article, LOL. About nearly fell off my chair {:)
Well, so much for homework and studying for my upcoming test today … this alone will have me probably blogging at least part of the day, if not most of it. Can’t believe something as innocent as E-Bay lead to this, LOL. Thanks for the credit though … it was nice of you to mention me. But what means the most to me is the assurance that now I’m pretty darn sure the State has what it needs to really nail the coffin shut on this case. I was wondering how the Globe got the photo too. Wondering seriously if the name begins with “A”. Have never been able to get rid of that gut feeling that something has always been seriously amiss there in regard to her. Oh, my heart aches and sings today at the same time. That photo breaks my heart … but at the same time, it also gives me hope that maybe Caylee will finally get true justice after all this is said and done after all! God Bless You Blink … and all you other Blinkers out there. Thank you for helping me to stay sane in a very insane and heartbreaking case such as this.
#2_BLINK
“This photo was not lying around taken as evidence, my bet would be the original file was subopoened from the Globe after Caylee was found. That photo was sold and chosen for a reason to be on the cover, make no mistake. Whoever sold that photo knew what she would be found in, if in fact, she ever was.
B”
Blink, are you of the opinion that someone close to ,or one of theAnthonys actually want to see Casey ‘go down”? Sounds like it in this post.
No, I think Casey sold it knowing she would be found, if she were found, in it, no doubt her “agent” negotiating the price passed that on to the proper folks for the best price.
B
#4 Granmomma
I don’t know why, but my gut feeling has always been Annie D knows more than she has admitted. She is also the only one that has ever had any major emotional reaction to being interviewed by LE regarding Caylee’s disappearance and death. She was Casey’s best friend for quite awhile and around the time a lot of Casey’s alleged “changed” behavior was being carried out. I also believe IIRC that parts of her interviews have still not been released, which makes me wonder why, but I could be wrong on that. Is it possible Annie took the photo innocently, then possibly realized later that was the same shirt Caylee had on the day she eventually went missing, hence her emotional reactions to LE’s questioning later? I don’t know … just something about her has always bugged me. Even Yuri Melich questioned during one of her interviews her demeanor … as if something was going on with Annie but she wasn’t revealing it during their interview. She has never appeared as forthcoming as the rest of Casey’s old friends … there’s almost a guarded hesitation there when she speaks. Lastly, I believe there were several parts of Annie’s interviews that were “off the record” as noted in many of the transcripts, so what did she tell police off the record? Just too many hinky moments for me to think they’re all just coincidence but that’s just my opinion.
Gee. Do you suppose Casey is wishing she had used different resources other than her “own”?
wow Blink, Thanks!! And I am so LATE in ‘getting it’– my first thoughts are never that ‘they knew what they were selling as in, setting up the story to show Caylee in the shirt would be found in. So who sold that photo or who made the choice of which ones Lawyer Baez or Cindy Anthony, should have the rights to sell on behalf of Casey??
Great work, Blinkers, on the discovery of the ‘car’ in that photo though.
And the baby being ‘held’ explains the shape seemingly under the shirt– the letters themselves could cause a bit of that firmness and that, and the adult’s arm, would just cause the shirt to fold the way it has/
(I couldn’t figure the ‘trunk’ thing– couldn’t see how the view would work etc)
I have to lol.
I understand the point that photo was sold etc,but do you know who had this photo or who sold it?
Let’s take the my space page docs had in it.
That lady is a pal of Rg’s which is where photo {cropped } was found.
It was linked to Yuri in a email which is why her page appears in docs.
She certainly did not get that photo from Casey’s my space or photo bucket account,as it was no where on the net.
Ask her where she found it!
I am not clear on what your saying. Can you be more specific with links please. Regardless of where a cropped photo exists, you can clearly see it is NOT cropped on the Globe, and this pic was sold and appeared prior to Caylee remains being found.
B
Blink
If you feel this link to be inappropriate use, please feel free to not post,
http://www.globemagazine.com/story/245
Blink – #13:
You actually think Casey sold this pic for money – and she sold that damning piece of evidence just for money? Really?
Definately, remember the in camera hearing on her finances? That is what Baez objected to as sealed during Cindy depo.
This photo was sold PRIOR to her recovery. Why this photo on the front? There are hundreds.
B
Hi Every
I have a question can someone please
Is it possible that her agent could have been her attorney Mr Jose Baez?
And if this is so will this person’s identity be made public. It’s dispicable the manner in which these individuals can dirty and taint the memory of this little girl.
back to my loft
It definately was, or he is at least aware.
B
Justice23…..I think we may be thinking alike on alot of things. Annie was my first thought. Didn’t she tell Lee in one of the jailhouse visits that Annie could not be trusted? Is that right? And, why would she say that if Annie actually spent time with Crazy and her family while Crazy was out on bond? Sounds to me like Annie was the only one Crazy trusted.
YOU SO SMART!
What is the sentence for obstuction of justice? and if Baez has this photo and has not shown the prosecution this can he get into “BIG TROUBE”?
Great observation about the appropo price for that particular photo. WHY should that photo be any more pricey than any other, showing the baby and Casey??? Because someone knew the implications and how that photo would be more than ‘one off’ publication– the purchaser of rights, would have the story attached to that photo and maybe repeat rights.
AND to note– remember the same thing when Cindy provided the video of Casey playing with Caylee in those stripped shorts, so well doc’d in the discovery as we’ve seen so far.
(And George seemed to say striped shorts, way back when, but didn’t he say she didn’t often wear striped shorts, or have striped shorts typically???? That would go to this being a rare design for Caylee– oh yeah, Cindy said that Caylee did not typically wear writing on her shirts– she herself, would never buy them for Caylee, and didn’t know who purchased anything like that for Caylee.)
————
Off thread, Blink– BUT I am reallly confused at Judge Rodriguez’s motion to dismiss the civil case– not the order itself, but the handwriting notations that CC to Ms. Tennis. WHY on earth??? Ms. Tennis represents a ‘witness’, not the plaintiff, not the defendant.
WHY does a ‘Witness lawyer’ get noticed? Because the witness had a contract at one point, but hadn’t spoken to that client for a year, mean that lawyer becomes part of the ‘joint defense’??
#13_Blink
I don’t know if I could go with that theory. EVERY effort was made to describe the clothing that they were last seen in, by George, and it wasn’t THAT shirt. Did someone ‘toss’ this in with Caylee’s remains? Or was George lying? Also, why would anyone on the defense tip their hat and elude to this being what she will be found in, after all of the efforts of George?
Like someone else mentioned, maybe it was a friend of Casey’s?
Not talking.
B
Anyway, can you contact the globe and get a statement?
Thank you Justice 23, I had been about half sick since convincing myself that was a photo of the baby in the car trunk. It is a real relief.
Won’t the Globe have to admit who they got the picture from? Do you all think it means that the Globe bought the pic because it was Caylee in that shirt? Much more information to come out about this I think.
#12
) Not on your life would something like this not be recognized or acclaimed! You get the BOC award of the year! You will be sending that right to her, right, B?
Good job, Justice!
“Not talking.”
B
Exasperating! lol
Blink –
#18…**THUD***
Oh. My. Gosh.
So – if that is the case…then Baez DOES know that Casey is guilty and she is the murderer…right?
**THUD**
You think he is ever going to admit that? You think she will? It was sealed , I will make the assumption he is of the opinion he is home free. Casey did not break any laws to sell this photo, but it is awfully compelling of “knowledge”.
B
Hi Blink
Yuri was sent a link to the photo a few days after the docs came out that said what was on shirt {letters}
That myspace page of Jaden’s Grandma was where photo was found.
So link to myspace page was sent to Yuri!
That photo was no where on internet,which is why it stuck out to me and I remembered location of it.
Now somewhere on Websleuths someone said that was a photo that was Rg’s and he said not to use his photos {something along those lines}
So ask the lady that has the myspace where she got photo because I know it was not anywhere else online until I linked it via topix.
I appreciate the explanation but without links to what you are referring I am still in the dark. Are you suggesting Richard Grund sold this photo to the Globe? Or are you saying a cropped version?
B
westsidehudson
LOL … I E-Bay often and happened to check my account this morning. For some reason, I typed in Caylee Anthony just to see what would come up and a bunch of magazines did that people were selling. There was only one with Caylee on the cover in that shirt and it caught my eye so I clicked on it and there it was. I almost hot-nellied in my pants … it was the entire photo and the Globe cover was dated October 20th, 2008 which gave me chills. So I posted it to get everyone’s opinion. The rest I guess is history … thanks to you, Blink.
What I think a few folks may be missing, is that the state HAS the uncropped file, or a renamed file I believe it is:
signonorbella1, from memory. Note the bella, note the tat, not an accident.
B
Noticed a blurred area on the Caylee photo that is online of the colour cropped photo– it is located on the viewer’s right side of her cheek (on Caylee’s left). Wondered about it.
Now look closely at the photo Blink provides in her story– notice??? It’s on the GLOBE link photo provided in Blink’s story also– it’s very clear.
That little ‘bruise’ below Caylee’s left eye can be seen in other photos of Caylee. That would date this photo to the time she had the bruise.
Note– the state’s version had the bruise masked– they may have ‘redacted’ the bruise for purposes of asking the family if they had seen that photo before.
WHO was the original photographer of that photo? (if not taken on an Anthony or Casey camera or phone?)
Who else may have seen that shirt at the time the photo was taken? Only Casey and the family?
Got a date for the photo yet Blink?? (or narrowed it?)
It’s not really that great of a photo. Which leads me to ask why would the Globe choose that one if they had many to choose from? It is because someone directed them to use that specific photo? If yes, who? I am sure someone from the Globe would know that answer.
Kleat (22)
I believe cc to Ms Tennis is because Dominic the PI was refusing to give his statement to Morgan and Morgan and therefore this will effect him.
Let us not forget Casey’s own words.
“They haven’t even found her clothes yet.”
Blink – #28:
No – I will expect that neither of them will EVER admit the entire truth of what they know.
I’ve been thinking, to some degree, though – that Casey never gave the truth to Baez, either.
I figured he was operating along on her lies…and, of course, being her attorney, wouldn’t WANT to know the real truth.
But – if what you say here shakes out to be true – and he was her agent – then he knew that pic was worth more cash than all the rest.
This case gets sicker and more twisted with each passing day…ya know it?
wpgmouse
Thanks .. I am most humbled though to be in the presence of so many amazing, intelligent and intuitive minds here. I simply happened upon a photo, but the conversation and sleuthing abilities of everyone here I believe is truly phenomenal and often knocks me off my feet in awe. Blink, kleat, silver, wpgmouse, all of the fellow Blinkers … you’re all a blessing for justice for little Caylee and I commend you all. My justice for Caylee eventually be served, which is what I want so much I can smell it (sorry for the possible visual, no pun intended).
Way to go Justice and Blink!
Remember the states motion to compel funding sources? The famous “from Pauper to Princess” (love Mr. Ashton)
Did Baez just eff himself in the azz? Did he lie to the court about not selling the story/rights to media or skate around the truth to not include him selling photo’s?
I think the state has caught him out in a big fat lie and that sure explains his strenuous protesting during the depo’s. ZIP IT!!
Here is a link that contains the motions:
http://www.wftv.com/news/19002037/detail.html
I dont think he lied, Casey herself can sell anything right now, as long as she sold it, and if she used funds to pay him in his responsibilities, it is not illegal. The question becomes- WHY THIS PHOTO??
B
Steph
I disagree. IMO it is a GREAT photo, regardless if the Globe knew the true significance of it or not. A picture tells a thousand words, right?
Oh Justice23 – you rock!!!
I’m still lost about this picture ….
So they picked this one on purpose because that is what the body would be found in? Why would they do that?
Sorry I didn’t have my ‘ah-ha’ moment with this yet….can anyone explain for me?
And– “IF” the shorts, as Ms. Blink has artfully proposed in a much earlier article, were placed at the scene subsequent to the body being placed there, then why? Why not just use the ‘shorts’ or skirt etc, that the baby would have been wearing when George last saw them? Or, even if George did not see them, Casey would not have put her daughter in the car and driven to ‘work’ or out in public, with her almost 3 year old in diapers, even pull-ups.
The shorts had to be added IF the baby was not fully dressed at the time she was dumped– therefore, was she killed without being completely dressed to ‘go out’ in the day? Therefore– maybe time of day is suggested.
(“They didn’t even find her bag of clothes…”— hmm, did Casey not realize at the time she said that, that maybe these ‘clothes’ would have been found by her little helper elves, and that they were distributed appropriately, and were already ‘out of the bag’ and on scene?)
If ANYONE could add anything to the bag of the baby’s body, it would be Cindy– and I’m not just talking the family here, it would have to take someone who has experience with such things not to be sick– couldn’t hire someone and take that risk of leaving dna (I won’t be graphic and wouldn’t have thought of this except for a Colton story on the news last night– how they knew it was him who stole the Cessna and crashed it mid-state WA).
Cindy said she was ‘a nurse of decomposition’ (well, assume she mean she had experience as a nurse or nurse in training, with decomposition.
Cindy said ‘I have debrided flesh before’– (that means rotting flesh, bad odours)
Cindy said ‘I have smelled pseudomonis’ and she went on and on about how bad that is, nothing worse (FBI SB interview) as you can smell it down the hallway from the patient’s room.
(Cindy was making the point that 1. she was experienced with the odour of rotting flesh and of decomposition— therefore she could make professional judgement that the odour in Casey’s car, was NOT human decomp. But also, 2. she was telling folks, that she has a very tough stomach for such things as demanded by her profession. (she did work as an OR nurse, NO? For an orthopedic surgeon?)
signorina bella is a topix poster not a file name or secret photobucket account of the Anthony’s.That was her own photobucket account she put picture in.
She is just a topix poster and she also sent photo to Yuri.
I also am not suggesting Rg sold anything!
A websleuth poster stated it was a photo he had on his page at one point.
The cropped photo was what was on the myspace page of Jadensgmom not full photo.
You’d have to ask her where she got it at and if she cropped it.
I have no idea.
So signo sent Yuri a cropped photo? Correct?
B
Moonbeams, thanks, but wouldn’t that be the job of Mr. Mitnik, Morgan, Dill, to duly advise the witness they call, of the judge’s order?
Maybe Ms. Tennis was getting a courtesy copy from the judge– so she had NO excuses to pull her dramatic ranting style out in the media. Judge Rodriguez may have been giving her a lesson in professionalism once again.
Here is the topix poster in question
http://www.topix.com/forum/city/orlando-fl/TQ6H2EP48T3UJ32LL
First poster.She is just a regular topix poster.
Note: Casey is NOT wearing the same shirt she was wearing in the blockbuster video . . .
“Caylee reaching out” to someone who is in the direction of the camera– or the person with the camera. We have seen that before– Caylee crying or not happy certainly, when the photo of Lee holding her outside, was taken.
Was this photo taken by Cindy on Cindy’s camera? Cindy never mentioned George taking photos of Caylee, she did talk about both she and Casey finding it ‘easy’ to pick up a camera and take photos of Caylee at any time. And, the baby is reaching for someone she is attached to– vs some stranger at a gathering.
I want to know if that photo was taken at an age of Caylee, that would let her fit into that shirt. Or could the shirt also have been planted– but that would be harder, given where it was located, as Blink says, it appears to have been worn by the baby.
I think if Cindy is believed it is 24 mos or 2T and Caylee no longer fit in it “really”.. My guess is this is going to be an attempt to tie back to Jesse somehow. These people
B
Kleat – I don’t get it either. Why bring the shorts to the site later? For what purpose? I’m probably dense – but I just don’t understand the “why” of that action.
So they would have something at the site to confuse the timeline, and to plant evidence, possibly in the hopes someone would see it and look further.
B
ONE more thing– just an off-topic note, but in in recent depos, it’s indicated that George never asked Casey if she killed Caylee, nor did he ask anything too much— comment in the depos that the family all thought the house was bugged.
So– George, my question would be– can electronic bugging devices listen in to communicating by writing? That would be simple– just write to Casey, PLUS, Casey according to Lee, can write in a cryptic fashion, so they could get the info by ‘guessing’ accurately, at what Casey writes and still be able to say they did not ‘hear’ this from Casey, nor did they read the exact words from Casey (as they would be in her cryptic style).
# 29_lol
LINKS?
can somebody please tell me how Jose Baez and the Anthonys get away with selling these photos of the deceased victim in order to pay for the murderer’s defense and for the Anthonys to live the good life? Jose Baez should be in trouble with the Fla.Bar.