Casey/Caylee Anthony Case: Caylee Pic in The “Big Trouble” T- SOLD TO THE GLOBE BEFORE Remains Found?

Disclaimer– exclusive original content copyright and property of Internet Network News, LLC and Blinkoncrime.com. Reproduction of this article , ANY OF IT’S CONTENTS, in whole or in part without proper attribution and source link is strictly prohibited without prior written permission.

 

BREAKING NEWS

Orlando, Fl– In the recent depositions by the State Attorneys Office in the case against Casey Anthony one common exhibit was noted in each deposition of George, Lee and Cindy Anthony.

A cropped version of a photo of Caylee wearing the tshirt that is believed recovered with her remains.

CoverofGlobe 

 

All 3 Anthony’s claimed to not have seen this picture before previously, although without being prompted, Lee noted the photo was cropped.

How then, did it get in the hands of The Globe? Could this be the evidence removed from the Anthony home that Jose Baez tells Cindy Anthony to “Zip It” during her testimony and objects to information he considered sealed by the judge?

This edition of the Globe was released October 8, 2008. Six days before Casey Anthony was indicted for murder and remanded to jail without bond.

THE SALE OF THIS PHOTO PRE-DATES THE RECOVERY OF CAYLEE MARIE ANTHONY FROM THE WOODS OFF SUBURBAN DRIVE.

One could make the leap that the person selling it would have had knowledge of what she was wearing when 34 month old Caylee Marie met her tragic end. 

(EDITORS NOTE: Don’t even try the picture was sold at the yardsale with the clothes and laundry bag– PUHLEASE..)

Blinkoncrime.com poster “Justice 23” contributed to this report.

 

Related Posts:

1,441 Comments

  1. columbiares says:

    Okay Blink- who is this Ivoire chick- I wanna take her behind the barn!!! I have YET to find anything you wrote to be off base. I saw shoo shoo Ivoire- stay out. (Sorry Blink- you I’m a protective momma)

    aww, it’s all good folks. No need for the Barn, lol!
    B

  2. columbiares says:

    saw = say – protective momma who’s dyslexic- blush

  3. kew17 says:

    Wow – interesting reading this evening Blink~! I feel honored to be in the company of such a whackadoodle! You are talented and loved by all!

    Ty kew
    B

  4. KC7820 says:

    I very seldom post, mostly just read the amazing comments on this site. This evening I stumbled across something I just had to share. I was comparing the letters found at the crime scene with the letters in the NE article.

    All of the sudden it jumped out at me. The letters at the crime scene appear to have been individually cut out from the shirt. Does that mean they were cut out and then tossed into the bag, some sort of puzzle for the finder to put together?

    Not sure on how to post links so not sure the link below will work. I put all of the letters found at the crime scene into one image.

  5. KC7820 says:

    I am not sure my first link posted. Trying again.

  6. NancyS says:

    In Regards to Post 883

    WOW looks like someone needs to redo basic reading 101…. HAHAHA

    thanks for the laugh Justice23!

    SNARK ALERT!!!! big time.

  7. Sparkling says:

    Blink -

    Could the mystery actor with only a bit part be Geraldo ???

  8. lily says:

    Uurrrrg I tried to explain the same misunderstanding about the photo NOT actually being with the remains. Its so frustrating how people misinterpret this article! I’m beginning to think they do it with an agenda because its becoming NOT FUN to politely try to explain how this is just a misunderstanding. Now I realize what’s going on. I am only commenting here from now on, forever and ever! I am so done with dealing people with AGENDAS! Thanks Blink for a fair and safe place to come to. After venturing out ‘there’ – I’m back home to stay.

  9. TOY says:

    My eyes are shot from reading but looking at that photo on the front of the magazine, I am somehow reminded of a photo that was published many months ago. If I remember correctly, it appeared to be a motel (I think, possibly an apartment) and had a guy in fatigues. I’m not sure why this reminds me of that photo but it does. If anyone remembers the photo I’m talking about, could you provide a link, please?

  10. TOY says:

    Well, naturally I can’t sleep now until I try to find the photo that’s on my mind!

    While I was searching, I did find this photo with the funky eyeglasses I think you guys were describing:

    http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/local/caylee-anthony/orl-casey-anthony-trial-case-photos,0,2398805.photogallery

  11. TOY says:

    Grrr…sorry, I’m not too good at posting links.

    It’s photo #76 at that link. I don’t know how to link it properly.

  12. Angela_nw says:

    to wpgmouse (#893) – can you please tell me whether this small photo:
    http://www.clickorlando.com/2009/0602/19638179_120X67.jpg

    is cropped or from the same series/ setting as the one you are referring to (KC + Caylee sitting on RM’s black couch??)
    Was this taken in RM’s apt?
    Thanks.

  13. bluewillow says:

    Kleat #462 re: father of caylee
    OH! this explanation of the situation seems really in sync with the character of the characters involved!

  14. pamala read says:

    I am also a long time reader. This is my first post. I find that God is in full control with Casey’s punishment. With all the missing and murdered children in Florida the spotlight is on this case more and more.

  15. bluewillow says:

    I keep wondering why someone would google “shovel” myself… to get an idea of price? to get a graphic of one for some kind of use? If you google something then you can always switch to the image view to find images of a certain thing… or ??

  16. Sister says:

    Blink, hope you and the Blinkers have a wonderful weekend.
    Sometimes I’m right when I want to be wrong, but I knew ivoire was not going to be happy. Long time ago, when someone questioned the SHOUTING, the response was that it was easier to type that way. Teehee I said to myself, I just won’t read it because it wasn’t worth it. Teehee I am saying to myself, I was right, it just isn’t worth it.

    I guess I really dont understand why someone would waste their time. If someone thinks I am a whackadoodle ( who says that?) There are many other choices to follow this case.
    Have a wonderful weekend yourself.
    B

  17. wpgmouse says:

    At the Suburban scene, a toy horse with a toy fence was recovered.
    Strange, but I can’t find a photo of it in the last big document release.
    Was this toy red?

  18. ChicagoJudy says:

    Suz… I want to apologize for getting my words wrong when I posted about closing arguments. AFter reading silver’s post, I went back and reread what I had said. Silver is absolutely correct. I used “defense” where I should have said “prosecution” and vice versa. No excuse for that .. just in a hurry to respond and totally screwed up my post. Yes, the state gets the last word — which, of course, is why we were so glad that it was that way. So sorry for my “duh” moment above! Hope I didn’t confuse too many folks.

  19. soulsister says:

    Toy

    I agree, I really think this is where the photo was taken- been up all night thinking about this pic!

    Wish me luck! My oldest son is turning 16 today! And I have a party with 7 sixteen year old boys tonight!!!!

  20. MsEnscene says:

    #815 Cheryl in TX. I believe the “bull crapola” and the Anthony’s conflicting lies stemmed from the fact that after the last 911 call and from Cindy’s query “What have you done?” to Casey, they knew Caylee was dead. (I don’t hold with Cindy’s version of that question as “Why didn’t you come to me?” I believe Lee was telling the truth on that one.)

    They never acted like a family whose child was missing. In fact, they didn’t want real searches for that baby going on at all; hence, their hostility to Tim Miller. They wanted searches undertaken in CA, GA, TX, New York, Puerto Rico and all points away from Orlando.

    And in the jail questioning of Casey — about where she thought the baby was taken — Cindy would feed Casey clues to the answers she, Cindy, wanted on the recorded jail tapes. Cindy is so pathologically entwined with Casey that it wasn’t a hard task. Casey didn’t always play along, though. She, after all was the Mistress of Cermonies, now.

    While we’re at it, who in hell gives mere “clues” and “riddles” when a precious child is missing? You either keep your trap shut if your family is being threatened and your child is in danger, or you tell everyone everything you know as fast and as furious as you can.

    The entire faily thinks they are superior wits in their games to deceive when they’re dealing with the mushy media, and what they see as the dumb-cluck public, but they also think they can obstruct and obfuscate while handling the astute and experienced LE as well.

    Their stubborn self-assurance in the face of all their exposed B-movie hokum is one of the main reasons why they are so intensely disliked. Sometimes, you just gotta wonder if there is method in their madness instead of madness in their methods. Silversprn has cheered me on that score this a.m.. Blink and others also do a great job. Reassurance is so nice.

    BTW,I do not know whether the Anthonys knew exactly where the baby was dumped early on in the case, but I am coming closer to that belief.

  21. soulsister says:

    Here is the piture of the bed and the glasses

    http://www.nationalenquirer.com/

    those are the money glasses from pic #76

    http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/local/caylee-anthony/orl-casey-anthony-trial-case-photos,0,2398805.photogallery?track=orl-mark-rib-local-photobucket

    Morales is wearing them in pic– you can so tell those are the glasses laying on the floor from NE!

    anyone else see this?

    Yes ma’am!
    B

  22. soulsister says:

    #387 I have to tell you that I did the YEAH FOR ME DANCE this morning because I have never ever gotton blink biscuits before!!!!

    Lol. Well deserved.
    B

  23. lol says:

    Ok one thing

    Blink that was correct photo you linked {caylee vacuuming} but I seen clearer ones were you can see the striping on shorts.

    Jean JGM
    Your page was not sent to Baez ,it was sent to Yuri and only because You happened to be only person with that cropped photo at that time.
    It wasn’t sent because anyone thought you knew something,only because the picture was located there.

    I stated here you are just a caylee supporter.
    Not sure about anything else you stated but it was very important at that time yuri see that photo.

  24. Jean Brewer Jaden's Granny says:

    while the Anthonys have claimed UNDER OATH in their recent depositions that they have never seen that photo before.
    Bingo!!! you are right on!!!

    I was expecting Ms. Brewer. The conversation here, as well as the coverage, will stay neutral. Agreed?

    thank you, thank you!!! I do have friends in high places.
    I’m going to let this all wash off my back….
    Bless all of you for the work you do for that child..
    I hope my blog on my page with the pictures explained how my page ended up there. They are scrapping the bottom of the bucket to save
    Casie (mispel intentionally)
    Keep doing your good work, wish I could spend time here but it’s hard
    doing it all here at home by myself.
    God bless all of you!
    Jean Jadens Granny

  25. suz says:

    Hey sista, go sista, soul sista, flow sista
    Hey sista, go sista, soul sista, go sista

    Well done, soulsister!! Bingo! That’s them. If they were prevalent, it might be hard to know exactly who had ‘em (did everyone have them? Did one of those boys give them to Casey/Caylee and they had brought them to that particular apt they were visiting? Did she buy them in the dollar bin at Target like Sal suggests she could have?)

    We see at least two kids wearing ‘em in that pic, but have we seen a pic where even more dudes are wearing those hats (and we presume shades)? Those hats are ringing a bell…

  26. suz says:

    No worries, ChicagoJudy, it STILL makes more sense to me for the defense to go last, even though that’s not the way it works. Seems fairer. I know I am going to remember it wrong forever more, lol.

  27. suz says:

    Oh, Toy! Looks like you had found the photo last night with that WESH link to #76. I kept clicking on the youtube link in your post that mentioned pic 76, and was wondering where on earth you saw photo numbers in that montage, which is why I wanted you to repost the WESH link. Hadn’t noticed your post above with the WESH link. Maybe soulsister will share a blink biscuit with you. Kudos to you both! Well done.

    O please if I missed that blinkbiscuits to Toy as well.
    Enjoy the weekend all.
    B

  28. Jean Brewer Jaden's Granny says:

    You know I took that photo off of Caylee’s original page, it’s a grainy photo almost like it was taken from a MAGAZINE and cropped.
    Was the Globe already published or not?
    I was the only one with the photo that was found First.
    Like I said no problem with any of you here, keep doing your good job
    and bless all of you!
    I’m not upset with anyone, can you just imagine how I felt? With all I’ve been through to see my page in that Depo.?
    I’m not really stable anyway.. LOLOL
    You nall are welcome to share my posts on these other sites, I just don’t have time and Topix is not my style.
    Jean

    So you DID get it from Caylee is missing site?
    B

  29. TandT says:

    The T-shirt that the guys are wearing in this photo
    http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/local/caylee-anthony/orl-casey-anthony-trial-case-photos,0,2398805.photogallery?track=orl-mark-rib-local-photobucket
    Appears to be the same T-shirt that is in the dresser drawer on the Casey, Caylee photo here. http://www.nationalenquirer.com/

  30. lol says:

    Respectfully jean

    Le and media were all over those sites early on.
    Photo was not there.

    Cropped or otherwise.
    I don’t know if Ricardos myspace was ever opened ,so maybe it came from there.

    lol-
    I do not believe that photo (cropped) came from Ricardo’s myspace OR his computer.
    Ricardo’s laptop was “reviewed” by LE last year. I have no doubt if that photo was on there, it would have been reproducable in it’s full form, I guess as well as cropped.

    If we review the NE latest release, with the other pics from inside the apartment, I am more convinced those photos were sold by Casey, and with purpose due to that shirt. Again I say- why did they run with that pic on the cover of the Globe with everything photoshopped out, and now that we made the connection do they run with more photos with the same shirt?

    Cats out of the bag? The nature of the contract with the seller will absolutely come in here- I hope that is keeping someone up at night at the thought. Is it royalty based, meaning tied to the amount of copies sold as well? That would tell the story.
    B

  31. soulsister says:

    LOL Suz!!! That was so funny! Thanks for the great dancin this morning! And it was a sight to see a 40 year old woman dancing the YAEH FOR ME DANCE in my pj’s!! KIds were giving me the Whats up with my wierd mom today look! Thanks for the needed laugh and kudo’s Suz! Makes me feel so great the I can conribute to this site- usually in awe of how smart you all are.

  32. suz says:

    Wait, it’s official—-soulsister had it last night at 10:21! Winner and still champion!!

  33. suz says:

    Have a good weekend, Blink!

  34. westsidehudson says:

    #880_Jean Brewer Jaden’s Granny_

    Thanks for posting here. So if I understand correctly, someone sent your website to LE for the purpose of making it appear that you were involved? Am I getting that right? Just throwing out a name; was it Michele Bart, or someone closer or the Anthonys? Were you subsequently interviewed by LE? Do you know precisely where you found the cropped version of the photo? (I took it that you did not recall.) Did you know the Anthonys before Caylee went missing, or only after, with your website? Did Richard Grund have this photo as well? Does he know where it was shot: is it Jesse’s apt?

    #884_Blink _”IVOIRE”_

    Blink, I think that she posted essentially the same thing here, days ago, and you set her straight about the photo not being at the remains site. I’m not going to follow the link, but for benefit of doubt, maybe she posted that one there at the same time.

    #876_Momof3_”CORRECTION: Jesse never denied meeting Tony”

    Mom, he may have lied to Lee about not being there, when Lee was doing his own “investigations”. Lee states this in his depo. Take it with a grain of salt. Maybe Jesse did lie to Lee, or Lee was lying about what Jesse said. As long as Jesse didn’t lie to LE, though, it doesn’t seem to be a problem.

  35. soulsister says:

    Alright Toy…. you ready for the YEAH FOR ME DANCE?? got to get those hips a swaying, shakin that butt left to right, waving those arms high above your head and yelling at the top of your lungs.. YEAH FOR ME!! anyone can join in.. feels great!

  36. westsidehudson says:

    Sorry Blink I didn’t see soulsisters post, I thought originally that it was Riccardo’s.

    I thought it was as well, except the carpet match threw me. And to be honest, I am now more convinced than ever Casey sold this photo. I guess we have our next victim by the defense.
    B

  37. SuzeeB says:

    #910 Toy

    Toy I think this is the one you are talking about. This is Mark Hawkins in fatigues.

    http://itsamysterytome.files.wordpress.com/2009/04/mark-hawkins-2.png

  38. westsidehudson says:

    It looks as though you have signed off, Have a nice weekend Blink.

    Regards,
    Mr Figgelman

  39. Thinker says:

    MY THEORY ONLY: Richard Grund asked Jaden’s Granny to stop posting HIS photo on her MySpace. Richard Grund had this photo on his own MySpace for a while. It is Jesse’s bedroom and Jesse took the photo. Jesse gave a copy of the photo to Casey.

    The photo was also on the Anthony’s Caylee Missing website. Casey gave the photo to Baez, to sell.

    Someone gave the link to Jaden’s Granny’s MySpace page where the photo was posted, to Baez, trying to link a “Grund supporter” (Jaden’s Granny) to the photo (instead of reporting that Jaden’s Granny got the cropped photo from the ANTHONY WEBSITE).

    The Defense team is trying to implicate JESSE with the photo of Caylee in the Big Trouble shirt which was found with her remains. The Anthonys have tried to deny knowledge of the shirt, in their depositions with the State (even though the cropped photo was on their own website).

    Casey/Baez sold the photo to the GLOBE, but they may be trying to imply that Jesse sold the photo. The Anthonys have been trying to focus attention on Jesse for a long time, in their “SSDI – some other dude did it” defense. The Defense may be trying to imply that the Big Trouble shirt was with the remains because JESSE has a connection to that shirt and to Caylee’s remains.

    If any part of this theory is not accurate, I hope that Jaden’s Granny or Blink will let us know.

    According to Rev Grund, he has never had that photo on his myspace, and we have concluded it is from Ricardos apartment thanks to help from Soulsister, Toy and others. But if that brings you joy you have to do her dance. See above.
    B

  40. MsEnscene says:

    That photo! I an still confused about the Anthonys not recognizing the cropped picture. They surely saw it in the Globe. Can’t imagine that they were’t aware of that cover. They just didn’t recognize it cropped? Or they’re lying? Or am I incredibly dense? (Stifle that last answer!)

  41. Todd in Tulsa says:

    So, the National Enquirer will be obligated to release the info about who sold them that photo, the date, and everything? If that’s the case, the only thing I can come up with is, Casey must be either naive, extremely narcissistic, or both. Whom would sell incriminating evidence knowing it would be published?

  42. Todd in Tulsa says:

    (I suppose, that is, unless she never expected Caylee to ever be found)

  43. jm422p says:

    Hi – not sure if this has been posted but if you go to http://www.nationalenquirer.com/ there is a wider version of that picture…you can see more of the background.

  44. Thinker says:

    # Comment by soulsister — October 24, 2009 @ 8:36 am

    Here is the piture of the bed and the glasses

    http://www.nationalenquirer.com/

    those are the money glasses from pic #76

    http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/local/caylee-anthony/orl-casey-anthony-trial-case-photos,0,2398805.photogallery?track=orl-mark-rib-local-photobucket

    Morales is wearing them in pic– you can so tell those are the glasses laying on the floor from NE!

    anyone else see this?

    Yes ma’am!
    B

    GREAT JOB on finding those dollar sign glasses on Morales!!!! pic # 75 has the name “Morales” on the back of his Tshirt, in case there is any doubt!

    photo # 59 in this same group, shows Casey with “Beer Wench” Tshirt on, holding Caylee in the floral blouse and another girl at this same party.

    photo # 73 shows the red plastic cup on the shelf behind the girls, which is crushed on the floor under the dollar sign glasses in the cropped Big Trouble photo.

    http://media.photobucket.com/image/caylee%20anthony/princesslucylulu/Caylee%20Anthony%20case/untitled.jpg?o=1071
    photo of Caylee with purple star glasses – red cups in background – same dress/shirt on Caylee at beer wench party (same party where Caylee is later wearing the Big Trouble shirt)

  45. jm422p says:

    just scrolled up and realized the link was already posted so ignore my comment above!

  46. Thinker says:

    Thank you Blink!
    According to Rev Grund, he has never had that photo on his myspace, and we have concluded it is from Ricardos apartment thanks to help from Soulsister, Toy and others. But if that brings you joy you have to do her dance. See above.
    B

    I soooooooooooo should have read BACK through the comments I missed last night, BEFORE I posted my “theory”.

    Looks like the link to Jaden’s Granny’s MySpace was given to Det. MELICH (not to Baez). And looks like it is Ricardo Morales’ bedroom, not Jesse’s.

    Do you think Ricardo sold the Big Trouble shirt photo to GLOBE/National Enquirer? Or, did Casey sell her copy of the photo?

    Can I redeem myself by posting the additional photo evidence in my previous post, showing Caylee at the same party in her purple star glasses with her “Beer Wench” mother and Morales in the dollar sign glasses and the red cups in the background? :-)

  47. silverspnr says:

    Kleat-

    Another one!

    Not only does Ms. Tennis not PROOF READ documents before affixing her signature (WTH kind of lawyer does not READ before SIGNING?? Ummmm. Yeah. One that you do NOT want to represent you. EVER.), but she (more like “they”) has (have) NO CLUE what a PRIVILEGE LOG is.

    I’d bet you an order of fries and a cherry coke at the Woolworth’s counter that not ONE of them has ever prepared a “priv log” heretofore. Yes, privilege logs are more common in complex litigation matters, both criminal and civil, particularly in the realm of white collar charges/investigations and mass tort matters, but this does not relieve an attorney of his/her professional obligation to look it up and figure it out.

    In any event, those unsupported averments (the 3 paragraphs) will not suffice. And actually, the failure to prepare a log and assert “work product” on any specific documents (reports prepared, for example) suggests that there ARE NO DOCUMENTS UPON WHICH to assert “work product” privilege protection at all. I hope that ZG’s attorneys point this out to the court, along with the fact that the mere allegation of a privilege in those 3 paragraphs is wholly insufficient to support a ruling against the plaintiff’s favor on the motion to compel the deposition.

    Listen…
    Clearly, a decision has been made to put as little as possible into the civil case on Casey’s behalf. It is the least of her worries. As far as I can see, they are pretty much blowing it off, save for this issue– Dominic Casey deposition– although now that the State is set to depose him in the criminal case, a deposition in the civil case is not the lone –or the most pressing– threat. But if he is compelled to testify in the civil case, they may have wished they had not been quite so cavalier.

    Chicago Judy-
    Sorry for your friends’ loss. As for the order of closing arguments you observed…all I can say is that is totally out of the ordinary. The party who is entitled to “rebuttal” during closings is the party with the burden of proof (i.e. the plaintiff in civil cases; the government in criminal cases).

    And was it suz who suggested a coin toss in the name of fairness? Perhaps in a civil case where the plaintiff only has to “tip the scale” to 51% in order to meet its burden, i.e. a “preponderance of the evidence”, but keep in mind that the Government in criminal cases must prove their case “beyond a reasonable doubt”. That is a steep burden. Defense counsel certainly take every chance to remind the jurors of that in their closing arguments.

    Some judges do not permit “rebuttal”, and therefore permit the State to decide if they would like to go 1st or 2nd. But generally, is it is the order I previously described. And the government cannot rehash their own closing in “rebuttal”. It is limited to addressing the points raised by the defense in their closing. Not so unfair when you consider upon whom the burden of PROOF rests.

    Another point is that the prosecutor can normally respond to evidence presented by the defense, after the defense “rests”. This is known as –you guessed it– “rebuttal” evidence. The prosecutor can offer rebuttal evidence ONLY to attack evidence offered during the defense case (and not as an excuse to rehash his/her case-in-chief or put on new evidence unrelated to what the defense presented).

    Also- it is not uncommon for the defense to make a Motion to Dismiss again at the close of the State’s case in chief (before the defense puts on its own case). Even in a jury trial, the judge has the power to decide that the prosecution’s case by itself is not strong enough to support a guilty verdict.

    hk-
    What we know–by Cindy’s own admission–is that very early on– with in days of the 9-1-1 calls, she had knowledge that the Winnie-The-Pooh blanket “was there” (with Caylee). Now, where would she get that knowledge in order to compare it to what this Luke character was telling her, such that she found him to be “credible”, other than from the person who knew WHERE CAYLEE WAS and THE FACT that THIS BLANKET was WITH HER.

    I don’t buy that she didn’t know that Caylee was “gone” early on, but for the sake of argument:

    If she wasn’t allowing herself to accept that Casey did it before December 20th (when LE came back to Hopespring with a fresh warrant permitting them to search for a plethora of things, including the Winnie the Pooh blanket–see the link in my previous post, a few pages down in the report), she had to have known at that point that Casey was definitively linked to the dump site. HAD TO HAVE KNOWN IT FOR CERTAIN at that moment (because only the person who dumped her there would know what items were with her). She can’t say, well, Casey said that Caylee had that blanket with her when ZG “kidnapped” her, so I assumed it was with her always. That makes no sense. The person who dumped that baby in the woods is the only one who would know that the Winnie-the-Pooh blanket was “there”. THANK YOU, CINDY, for not being able to keep your mouth SHUT.

    *****
    B-
    I remember it well;) And I do NOT hold it against him one bit. I had knocked over several glasses of milk on the dinner table, and was WARNED to stop. I have a scary memory, so says my mother. I particularly remember that she was furious with my father, but not because it was the wrong way to handle me; rather, my obsessive-compulsive neat-clean-freak mother was furious, because my father “made a mess”. That was a MAJOR no-no in our house. God love her, she is a little nutso about things being CLEAN, NEAT, ORDERLY, etc. Example? I had to eat my after school snack OVER THE SINK, and then? SCOUR out the sink..and DRY IT. And WIPE my FINGERPRINTS OFF of the REFRIGERATOR DOOR HANDLE. Really. So.. Cindy’s laundry separation bins? Did not phase me one bit. Maybe this is why I am the only one who is FURIOUS that Casey was permitted to SLEEP IN while CA and/or GA gave Caylee breakfast.. or that Caylee got her OWN BREAKFAST. WTH. That blew me away. Does Cindy think the world is impressed by that??? A child that age should not be getting her own breakfast together. Part of the bonding process is being FED/having your meal prepared by a loving, nurturing parent. This is part of how a small child develops EMPATHY and learns to care for/feel responsible toward OTHERS. (because they know how it feels to have that constant care/concern exhibited toward themselves).

    Meanwhile… back from RantVille! lol! I am still loving “Figgleman”!! Too darn cute!!!!!

    Ahhhh=) Yes=) Keith Williams. (For whose interview, you got IDed by Dom Casey to Cindy;)(WOW. Great detective work there, eh??;) (Did she read the SHAMROCK LANYARD piece and decide to come clean about it during the deposition as well???)

    Anyway- Glad you reminded the crowd of that encounter. Speaks volumes.

    According to Cindy’s deposition testimony, she was willing to believe some alleged UNKNOWN “Luke” and his “psychic” pal, Jeanett –about the Winnie-the-Pooh blanket being “THERE” (with Caylee)–within a week or two of Casey’s arrest, over the PHONE no less… but, according the Keith Williams, Cindy was not only lacking curiosity about a bag of items he brought to her HOUSE which could possibly be tied to Caylee’s disappearance/location, but she was entirely dismissive of it. (And yet, sends Dom Casey to the same area in November).

    *****

    BTW- I do believe that Casey took the photo of herself and Caylee from the house and brought it to Baez’s office based on what transpired on the record during Cindy’s deposition. SOMEONE –either Casey or someone on her behalf– sold it to the Globe. Just how they “marketed” the photo… remains to be seen.

    Do you recall that Cindy, from early on, was suggesting that there were “red flags” about Ricardo?? She described him as acting in a manner she found suspicious when all the friends gathered at Hopespring; she pointed out the photo with the drum set to Casey during that jail visit; and during her deposition, she testified that this LUKE character told her about a HOUSE–not far from the AMSCOT–with a dog barking excessively–as being linked to Caylee. And she then (unbelievably) went on to say she provided this info to Dom Casey to investigate, and LO and BEHOLD?!! Dom Casey told her that he was ALREADY doing surveillance on a house (LOFL) with a dog that was barking.

    Yahhhhhhhhh. Imagine THAT “COINCIDENCE”.

    And you can guess the LAST NAME of the person who owned that house, right? Yes, ladies and gents. It was “MORALES”. (“So that was a link to Ricardo” per Cindy– or something like that. I didn’t bother to go back and quote her directly, but that was her point.)

    GOOD LORD, but she is a conniving woman.

  48. Gypsy DD says:

    Blink and friends..Does anyone else recal when the car was found at the tow yard Cindy earlier left a voice mail ot text for Casey saying Big Trouble …call me? Sorry I don’t have a link handy.

    Interesting that the shirt shows up with part of that phrase.

  49. njsleuth says:

    To #941 mcEnscene – OMG. say it isn’t so. You don’t think the Anthony’s would LIE???? Snark! It amazes me how stupid the Anthony’s think everyone else is. Its amazing they don’t have yard sticks for noses.

    Question: If the NE/Globe PAID for the picture can they still invoke first amendment rights, protecting sources, etc?

    I believe they will get a court order specifying the need for them to turn over that information, yes. As it may be evidence in a murder investigation. I suspect that there will be a few back and forths on the issue legally, and I also dont think we will hear anything about it until it is resolved.
    B

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment