Casey/Caylee Anthony Case: Caylee Pic in The “Big Trouble” T- SOLD TO THE GLOBE BEFORE Remains Found?
Disclaimer– exclusive original content copyright and property of Internet Network News, LLC and Blinkoncrime.com. Reproduction of this article , ANY OF IT’S CONTENTS, in whole or in part without proper attribution and source link is strictly prohibited without prior written permission.
BREAKING NEWS
Orlando, Fl– In the recent depositions by the State Attorneys Office in the case against Casey Anthony one common exhibit was noted in each deposition of George, Lee and Cindy Anthony.
A cropped version of a photo of Caylee wearing the tshirt that is believed recovered with her remains.
All 3 Anthony’s claimed to not have seen this picture before previously, although without being prompted, Lee noted the photo was cropped.
How then, did it get in the hands of The Globe? Could this be the evidence removed from the Anthony home that Jose Baez tells Cindy Anthony to “Zip It” during her testimony and objects to information he considered sealed by the judge?
This edition of the Globe was released October 8, 2008. Six days before Casey Anthony was indicted for murder and remanded to jail without bond.
THE SALE OF THIS PHOTO PRE-DATES THE RECOVERY OF CAYLEE MARIE ANTHONY FROM THE WOODS OFF SUBURBAN DRIVE.
One could make the leap that the person selling it would have had knowledge of what she was wearing when 34 month old Caylee Marie met her tragic end.
(EDITORS NOTE: Don’t even try the picture was sold at the yardsale with the clothes and laundry bag– PUHLEASE..)
Blinkoncrime.com poster “Justice 23” contributed to this report.
Related Posts
Related Posts:
1,441 Comments
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
suz ~ I too believe she ran out of gas. I believe Casey was used to driving around with very little gas in her car. However, I don’t think it was completely empty. She was able to pull into that space. No way did anyone push it into that spot. And I think she ran the A/C waiting for Tony until it finally ran out of gas. Another thought, maybe she pulled into that spot because it was right by the dumpster to throw something away that was in her car. Or maybe she did business in the Amscott, got in the car, low on gas almost on E and decided in that moment, I am just going to call Tony and tell him I ran out gas, I have to distance myself from this car that smells so bad.
I’m with you on the car running out of gas Steph. I don’t think a pontiac sunfire is high on the hotwire list unless its unlocked and the keys are in the ignition. Especially one that smells like there’s been a dead body in it – in case one were to get pulled over for stealing it!
You guys are such great detectives on this site! I have been following your post for quite a while but have never posted until now. The pool has always bothered me from the beginning. Has the following scenario ever been brought up in any forums that anybody can knows of? Could it have been possible that Casey hid that precious baby’s body in the backyard on the 16th and then came back within the next couple of days (when the neighbor saw her backed up to the garage) and then …(It makes me sick to my stomach to even write this)…put her in the pool to clean her up before putting her in the trunk? The reason I say this is because I am pretty sure I read somewhere in the very beginning of this case about the Anthony’s draining their pool but I don’t remember ever reading about when that was done. I remember the Anthony’s telling Greta early on that on the 17th they found pool chemicals and the ladder next to the pool.
George depo – 8/5/09 ..pages 1-377
http://www.wftv.com/pdf/21310228/detail.html
pg 182 – 183 – Exhibit 9 – cropped photo of Caylee in Big Trouble shirt
Q Let me show you State’s Exhibit 9 and just ask you if you recognize that photograph? [Handing]
A [Examing] Yeah. It’s a photo of Caylee.
Q Have you ever seen that photo before?
A No. I don’t remember if I have or not. I don’t believe so. No.
Q The shirt that she’s wearing in that photograph, do you recognize – from what you can see of it, do you recognize that shirt?
A Not off – no. I don’t recognize that shirt. I don’t know if it’s a pajama or if it’s a T-shirt. I’m not really sure. I’m not – I don’t know.
Q Could that be the shirt she was wearing when she left?
A No. She wasn’t wearing this one.
Q Okay. So it’s a pink shirt, but a different pink shirt?
A Yeah. It definitely wasn’t this one right here.
Q Okay. Thank you. All right. Now, after
pg 184
June 16th of 2008, when was the next time that you had any communication with Casey, either telephonic, text message or in person; you, personally?
Steph (#1401),
I think you’re right about her intentionally parking in the Amscot parking lot vs. guys pushing it into that spot. I’ve always surmised though that she intentionally parked next to the dumpster in case Tony or someone else smelled the odor of her car. She could always blame it on a smelly dumpster! (It is action like the choice of parking spots for this discarded, smelly car that lead me to conclude that while Casey may not be considered smart by some, she is certainly devious enough to deceive.)
Cindy – 7/28/09 Part 1 ..pages 1-200
http://www.wftv.com/pdf/21310276/detail.html
Cindy – 7/29/09 Part 2 ..pages 1-476
http://www.wftv.com/pdf/21310288/detail.html
Exhibit 33 – photo of complete Big Trouble shirt – pg 536 of transcript, pg 354 of PDF
Q [Pause] Let me show you 33. And do you recall Caylee having a shirt like that?
A It wasn’t very often that she had, like, writing or – - on T-shirts. It looks kind of familiar, but I can’t say for certain. I mean, I’ve seen those, like, in the stores, but I can’t say for certain. It wasn’t anything that she wore, you know, if she had something like that.
Q All right. Do you recall ever seeing her in a T-shirt that looked like this?
A No. Like I said, it was rare that she ever had anything. I know the one shirt that said: I got
pg 537 of transcript, pg 355 of PDF
my good looks from my mom.
Q Right.
A But that’s not something I would buy.
Q That shirt?
A Yeah. I wouldn’t have bought that for her.
Q Okay. Do you recall ever washing it, a shirt that looked like that or anything?
A Actually, no. I mean, I – - I recall washing, you know, most of her clothes most of the time, but I don’t recall something that said those words. I mean, she had plain pink tops. I’m not sure how many – -
Q I think that’s 35, Exhibit 35. [Handing] (cropped photo of Caylee pointing, wearing Big Trouble shirt) Have you seen that picture before?
Q Do you believe that to be Caylee?
A Yes. It looks like Caylee. I can’t tell you where this was taken.
Q [Pause] And the last item, I believe. All right. [Handing] Exhibit 34 (handwritten list of items that George and Cindy want back from the sheriff’s office), do you recognize that?
A Yes. This is George’s writing and partially my writing.
Well I went back and both listened and watched the jail house visit of 8/14/08…I did not feel that Cindy seemed any different that always…unvailable to give tough love..I did find it interesting that in part 3 Casey say’s she wants it to just be about them and no more buiness dealings…could this be the clue to who sold the picture of Cayee in the PINK SHIRT to the Globe????
I watched the 8/14 videos again..I did not find anything t let me bievle that Cindy felt Caylee was dead..In Part 3 I found it interesting that Casey just wants family..no more business dealings..could this be the sale of the shirt to the Globe?
If Casey was my daughter I would of straped her down into the car and driven the entire state of Florida until we found Caylee,..even if it took days…and if I did not find her or the answers I needed to hear..I would of drove her to the closest jail an dropped her ass off…no money…no car..no ride back…see you..and that would be my first day of tough love with her. ..
next step Caylee only!
I really never felt like the A’s looked for Caylee themselves or any of their family members…they just acted the motions and directed the media.
Wow–I think Cindy relayed to the FBI the closest we’re going to hear of a “confession” from Casey, as told to Lee by Casey. Cindy’s describing the minutes just prior to Casey realizing that thirty-one days of her bella vita had probably run its course and told Lee she hadn’t seen Casey in that long.
Goes something like this:
Cindy: …I’m not sure how she [Casey] said it, but she said “I don’t want to disrupt her life because from here on out, Caylee’s life will never be the same”.
FBI Guy:
Cindy: I never knew what she meant by those words, and I never thought to ask her about it.
It’s at the very end of Part 3 at the 35:00 mark. I hope I’ve linked properly–
http://www.wftv.com/video/18036013/index.html
#1347 – Ada
“Had Caylee’s father been a part of her life, she would be alive today.”
IMO, too, too much speculation without knowing who we’re talking about. Caylee did have male influences in her short life, and though we’d clearly agree we’re not talking pope or president material, I think George, Jesse, Richard Grund, even Lee, and (it seems) most of her male friends…either loved Caylee or cared enough about her that they wouldn’t callously or with malice put her in harm’s way.
Frankly, Casey pretty much showed Jesse the consequences of trying to take on a fatherly role to Caylee–Casey was gone faster than a new bride’s panties!
There were plenty of people and opportunities to “save” Caylee from murder, if anyone in the world could have imagined she needed saving–if not the father, then grandparents, boyfriends, fiancee, girlfriends, uncle. I don’t think there is one person who knew Casey, who would have filed her under “baby daughter killer” prior to June 15/16 (I still haven’t decided which day Casey murdered that sweet munchkin) and beyond, probably not until July 3rd for some, and July 16th for everyone else.
Heck, I’m still incredulous believing she could do it (though I’m NOT in denial about whether she did).
Nope, I don’t think someone as insignificant (to Casey) as a father for her baby would have saved Casey or Caylee. Just so sad.
#1356 – Midwest Mom
“would a mother plea if she were innocent?
I have often asked myself this question, I don’t think I would plea.”
I’m probably naive, but why would someone plead guilty if they were innocent?
#1373 by Thinker. When Lee was asked if he’d ever seen that shirt before (on Caylee), all he had to say was yes or no. Did you see his answer? What’s up with that? He’s color blind; doesn’t know what the letter is… yadda yadda. It’s a yes or no question Lee!!
Thinking too hard, once again, perhaps; but, in the very beginning of the investigation, when Casey became the prime suspect and the computers were searched, couldn’t they have found the Dora page then, traced it back to Casey, and might that not be “the smoking gun” that caused the state to reinstate the death penalty? Could it not also be that they didn’t shut the page down for reasons of furthering the investigation – ie, to ascertain if the site would be accessed, by whom, and when, as on the 10th of October, I believe it was, prior to Casey’s final arrest, which didn’t occur until the evening hours. She had all day long to access that page and leave or change information, which also could have been done from Baez’s office. It’s just a thought, however ludicrous a thought it may be to some.
Have a great day!
Gavi
Not ludicrous Gavi, probable..
I have seen the computer forensic report noting the search for Zenaida/that corresponding myspace URL dating to 6/16. I included it in a piece and in some cases got lambasted for my interpretation of it until JWG stepped in; resident guru. Valhall followed it up to prove out creation date and changes. I personally believe they have monitored it from day one, and locked it down because they turned it over to the defense as required.
B
· Comment by ChicagoJudy — October 28, 2009 @ 8:19 am
#1373 by Thinker. When Lee was asked if he’d ever seen that shirt before (on Caylee), all he had to say was yes or no. Did you see his answer? What’s up with that? He’s color blind; doesn’t know what the letter is… yadda yadda. It’s a yes or no question Lee!!
Yes, I agree. I thought Lee did a whole LOT of unnecessary talking about that issue, instead of simply saying “No” he had never seen the shirt on Caylee. I posted Lee’s depo statements above,# 1373, and George’s depo statements # 1404, and Cindy’s depo statements # 1406. Cindy does alot of dancing around the issue also.
Please help me find a group of photos of Caylee.
Someone on here asked for the link to these photos of Caylee in this little pink striped shirt, and someone else posted the link to a group of photos of Caylee in this shirt.
Would you please post that LINK again? And post it on the Big Trouble shirt thread please.
Thank you
http://s439.photobucket.com/albums/qq120/cayleecross/?action=view¤t=CayleeJPRicardohousereddrapes.jpg
http://s439.photobucket.com/albums/qq120/cayleecross/?action=view¤t=CayleeRicardopinkbluestripes.jpg
REposting Cindy’s depo statements because I left out a sentence from Cindy
Cindy – 7/28/09 Part 1 ..pages 1-200
http://www.wftv.com/pdf/21310276/detail.html
Cindy – 7/29/09 Part 2 ..pages 1-476
http://www.wftv.com/pdf/21310288/detail.html
Exhibit 33 – photo of complete Big Trouble shirt – pg 536 of transcript, pg 354 of PDF
Q [Pause] Let me show you 33. And do you recall Caylee having a shirt like that?
A It wasn’t very often that she had, like, writing or – - on T-shirts. It looks kind of familiar, but I can’t say for certain. I mean, I’ve seen those, like, in the stores, but I can’t say for certain. It wasn’t anything that she wore, you know, if she had something like that.
Q All right. Do you recall ever seeing her in a T-shirt that looked like this?
A No. Like I said, it was rare that she ever had anything. I know the one shirt that said: I got
pg 537 of transcript, pg 355 of PDF
my good looks from my mom.
Q Right.
A But that’s not something I would buy.
Q That shirt?
A Yeah. I wouldn’t have bought that for her.
Q Okay. Do you recall ever washing it, a shirt that looked like that or anything?
A Actually, no. I mean, I – - I recall washing, you know, most of her clothes most of the time, but I don’t recall something that said those words. I mean, she had plain pink tops. I’m not sure how many – -
Q I think that’s 35, Exhibit 35. [Handing] (cropped photo of Caylee pointing, wearing Big Trouble shirt) Have you seen that picture before?
A No. I don’t think I’ve ever seen that picture before. I really don’t think I’ve ever seen that picture before.
Q Do you believe that to be Caylee?
A Yes. It looks like Caylee. I can’t tell you where this was taken.
Q [Pause] And the last item, I believe. All right. [Handing] Exhibit 34 (handwritten list of items that George and Cindy want back from the sheriff’s office), do you recognize that?
A Yes. This is George’s writing and partially my writing.
Cindy – 7/28/09 Part 1 ..pages 1-200
http://www.wftv.com/pdf/21310276/detail.html
Cindy – 7/29/09 Part 2 ..pages 1-476
http://www.wftv.com/pdf/21310288/detail.html
Exhibit 31 – photo of tattered striped shorts from crime scene (button and side pockets)
(Exhibits 31-35 marked as evidence pg 533 of transcript pg 351 of PDF)
Q All right. While she’s marking the remainder, I’m going to show you what’s been marked as 31. [Handing] Can you identify that item?
A [Examing] It looks similar to a pair of shorts that Caylee wore in 2007.
MS DRANE BURDICK: Does it look – - do you
pg 534 of transcript, pg 352 of PDF
have all the exhibits somewhere?
THE REPORTER: What you handed me, yes.
MS. DRANE BURDICK: No. The – -
THE REPORTER: Oh, yes.
MS DRANE BURDICK: – - past exhibits.
THE WITNESS” The only thing, I don’t recall a button on the front of her pants.
BY MS DRANE BURDICK:
Q You said it looks similar to a pair of shorts Caylee wore in 2007; is that – -
A Yeah. Caylee rarely had stripes on. She had one pair of striped shorts and one striped – - one striped skirt.
Q Is that Exhibit 23 (photo of Casey playing with Caylee in striped shorts) that I handed you?
A Yes. I don’t see pockets on this one. It looks like there’s side pockets. Actually, let me look at this. [Examing] There’s definitely side pockets on this and a button on the front of this, but I don’t see pockets on these. Most of her shorts, before she was two, really didn’t have pockets or need to have pockets.
Q All right. What size was she in last time – -
A 3T.
Q Shorts and top?
pg 535 transcript, pg 353 of PDF
A Yes. Unless it was an oversize. I mean, there was one – - there was one 18-month two-piece. You know how you get, like, the little pants – -
Q Uh-huh.
A – - and then the shirt? She was still able to wear the shirt but not the pants because it was just big. I don’t know how they make sizes. But most of – - she was in 3T.
Q Okay.
A She had some 2Ts in her drawer, but I was in the process of weeding those out.
Q All right. I’m going to show you – - the blanket that we are talking about, the Winnie-the-Pooh blanket, can you describe that again?
It strikes me as odd that Cindy had absolutely NO EMOTIONAL reaction to seeing a COLOR photo of baby Caylee’s shredded SHORTS when they were shown to her during her State deposition! I have a hard time looking at that photo, and I never personally saw Caylee in them.
http://s439.photobucket.com/albums/qq120/cayleecross/?action=view¤t=CayleeshortsCindydepo.jpg
I also found it odd that Cindy is doing ALL of the mother-role things for Caylee, instead of Casey. Such as washing Caylee’s clothes and buying her clothes for her, and weeding out the clothes that no longer fit.
1380 Dearest Dee
I’m an ultra sensitive person myself. I get how a melody, lyrics, being in a state of grace can bring you to your knees. I remember that song and how it made me feel (the song always remembers when). I am so blessed it came back into my life…because of you! Music has always been a direct connection to the Lord for me. Never fails, it uplifts my spirits or reminds me of what’s really important in my life…to be in the moment. God. Family. Friends. Brotherly love. Thank YOU for being you! Wish I could extend my arms to hug your precious soul xo
Comment by OnASeriousNote — October 28, 2009 @ 5:06 am
I’m probably naive, but why would someone plead guilty if they were innocent?
I agree with you, It is a pretty heavy question., It has been often stated that Casey should plea get a lessor sentence vs. getting the death penalty. I don’t think she is going to plea for the exact reason you stated.
With respect MWM, I dont think it will be offered to her.
B
I just love reading here! Blink has attracted of the most logically thinking people ever. Good job Blink! I usually don’t post too often, but here goes.
From what I know about these decal type tShirts, the letters do fall off in the dryer. This heat which could be compared to the summer heat of Florida. Another theory of mine which is a tad bit disgusting is; if the baby had vomited on the front of the shirt, this may have attracted more insects. Or the acidity of the stomach could have played a part in the deterioration of the front of the shirt as compared to the shorts. Gastric acid is very strong. At the same time this comes to mind, is it possible this part of the shirt was cut off because of what could have been revealed in an autopsy by the stomach contents??
Knowing this and the fact that Ric Morales did sell pictures to the Globe, I find it hard to wrap my mind around any conspiracy theory involving the pink tShirt. I just need to ask myself one question, “Does the shirt match the shorts?” Yes, they do. Seems to me, that’s what she was wearing. I think if it is determined that the shirt was purposely cut, I think it’s because of vomit or some other substance, maybe a substance that was used to kill her, IDK for sure. But I don’t think Casey did any creative snipping out in the woods. She’s just not that artzy-craftzy. jmo
I believe in George’s depo, they call the cropped picture of the big trouble shirt as, STATE EVIDENCE # 9..in Cindy’s they refer to the picture as #35 (losing my keyboard on laptop, it this fixable?) Why was she not presented the shirt in the same manner? Once evidence, always evidence?
Midwest Mom ~ I, of course, along with several others feel there is a mountain of evidence against Casey circumstantial or otherwise. You are always respectful in your posts and I need to be respectful of your opinion as well. Please help me to understand why you feel she is innocent. I really think it always good to hear the explanation from the other point of view.
# Comment by Debidoll129 — October 28, 2009 @ 2:21 pm
I believe in George’s depo, they call the cropped picture of the big trouble shirt as, STATE EVIDENCE # 9..in Cindy’s they refer to the picture as #35 (losing my keyboard on laptop, it this fixable?) Why was she not presented the shirt in the same manner? Once evidence, always evidence?
——————-
They showed George, Lee, Cindy the cropped photo of only Caylee pointing and wearing the Big Trouble shirt. They showed Cindy an additional photo of the Big Trouble shirt by itself, not ON Caylee.
George – Exhibit 9
Lee – Exhibit 2
Cindy – Exhibit 33 (photo of shirt alone); Exhibit 35 (cropped photo of Caylee pointing and wearing Big Trouble shirt)
http://s439.photobucket.com/albums/qq120/cayleecross/?action=view¤t=Exhibit33CindydepoBigTroubleshir-1.jpg
http://s439.photobucket.com/albums/qq120/cayleecross/?action=view¤t=Exhibit35CindydepoBigTroubleshir-1.jpg
Cindy KNEW the Winnie the Pooh blanket was MISSING but said nothing until the search warrant was served. And also admitted that she had “people” (Dominic Casey) walk that area.
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/media/acrobat/2009-02/45125794.pdf
Orange County Sheriff’s Office Supplemental Report
Case Number 08-074777
pg 7
On December 20th, I obtained another search warrant for the Anthony residence on Hopespring Drive. The search warrant was signed by Judge Perry who sealed both the warrant and the affidavit. This search warrant was based on additional evidence recovered since December 11th.
Cynthia and George Anthony were home when the warrant was executed. While standing in the living room waiting to begin our search, Cynthia read the copy of the warrant I gave her. In the presence of us all, she made a statement that one of Caylee’s “Winnie the Pooh” blankets was missing. George Anthony was visibly upset and angry at our presence. He was confrontational with us until Cynthia had him wait on the pack patio. On the back patio were Dominic Casey along with Dennis and Sherri Milstead from the Kid Finders Network. In front of Corporal Edwards, Cynthia stated that she had people walk “that area”, meaning where the body was discovered, a month ago and there was nothing in the area then.
#1419 – Comment by Midwest Mom — October 28, 2009 @ 1:26 pm
“I agree with you, It is a pretty heavy question., It has been often stated that Casey should plea get a lessor sentence vs. getting the death penalty. I don’t think she is going to plea for the exact reason you stated.”
I agree w/Blink that the plea deal is not available for her to consider. However, I’m also fearful that IF Casey has an epiphany and offers a full confession in exchange for 1) LWOP (the state would take nothing less) and 2) immunity from prosecution for her family, that the state might be compelled to consider, as the state coffers would certainly benefit without the cost of a trial, but also because my belief is that even if (read-WHEN) convicted, the sentencing phase will net her LWOP anyway, due to the dysfunction of her upbringing.
I’m hoping beyond hope that once her trial is over, the state will bring charges against Cindy and George for obstruction, tampering, perjury, whatever…and hold this family accountable for their actions.
I’m not being vindictive. I truly think the grandparents loved, loved, loved that baby–but unfortunately, only to the point of being forced to choose between a baby they can’t bring back to life and a daughter who’s life they may be able to save.
Once they knew Caylee was dead at the hands of their daughter, and I do believe they knew that quite early on, their actions and behavior grossly interfered with finding the truth and retrieving that baby from a trash-laden, swampy grave. It’s inexcusable for them to have taken this investigation, from both a financial and emotional toll, to the depths it has (unnecessarily) gone, and I think retribution of some kind is in order, as personally, I need closure where they’re concerned also.
I’m sorry…another tangent! I’m so over it, for now anyway.
ona-
I hear you. I know nobody wants to hear this, but based on her proffer I think the state WOULD discuss 25-life WITH the possibility of parole SHOULD HER ACCOUNT BE COMPLETE, and definately if it is one that establishes complicity of someone(s) else. Sans that, I really dont think the state has much incentive to charge the Anthony’s at the moment.
B
Oh my gawd, how could she get 25 years with the possibility of parole? This means she could be out in 7to14 years…she would only be 37..still able to have children..don’t you think the fraud case with set her in for life with no parole? Especially if she is convicted on all counts…this would give her a felony and she would be a criminal when her murder case comes about….which places her in another catagory for punishment.
Your forgetting the fraud charge- multi felonies. No chance of getting out of that.
B
#1391 I believe they already have.
Thinker #1417. I think both Cindy and George denied preparing for the depos, but I don’t believe it. The only conclusion I can come to is that Cindy had been practicing at showing no emotion by looking at those photos over and over prior to the depositions. How could anyone look at the shorts her dead granddaughter had been wearing, or the dirty stained bag that shrouded her little body, and show absolutely no recognition or emotion. I think it was Tracy who said Casey was a real hard adoubles. IMO she probably learned it from her hard as rocks mother. Cindy cries on demand for sympathy while the camera’s are running, and then she’s cool and collected in the deposition when confronted with the reality of what her daughter did? I don’t buy it.
#1425 Blink
“I hear you. I know nobody wants to hear this, but based on her proffer I think the state WOULD discuss 25-life WITH the possibility of parole SHOULD HER ACCOUNT BE COMPLETE, and definately if it is one that establishes complicity of someone(s) else. Sans that, I really dont think the state has much incentive to charge the Anthony’s at the moment.” B
WTH??? C’mon! Are you telling me Casey has proffered a plea?? I remember the state offering a plea very early on and rescinding the offer once evidence (decomp in the trunk, etc) came back and they charged her with murder.
I’ve not heard nor read that Casey has offered ANYTHING in exchange for ANYTHING. My understanding is she’s continuing her commissary shopping spree until her acquittal.
Most might think that Casey, if she did confess, would have credibility issues (Who’s to say that THIS story’s the truth?), but her account would easily be verifiable with all of the evidence the state has compiled and lying would annul any plea.
IMO, the state could offer her complete immunity if Casey could supply complicity, and still I don’t think that she could provide anything or anyone that would not eventually be debunked. To me, there’s just too, too much evidence against her and her alone.
Why would the state even consider anything less than LWOP, especially given the manner in which Caylee was found, implying malice and forethought? Casey’s attempt to implicate anyone would be in vain, unless it would be as an accessory after the fact, and I can’t believe the state would be willing to minimize her sentence because someone else helped her after the murder. Apples and oranges, if you ask me.
I hang on your every word, Blink…knowing you have waaaaay more insight and inside information than I could ever comprehend regarding this case.
Will you enlighten me? Does Casey have her own proffer on the table? I’ll even accept “Catch up on the reading, ya lazy bum!!” At least I’ll know it’s out there somewhere. Or have I completely misread?
If not…(to plagerize you)….THUD!
Lol, NO….. REPEAT NO….
In no way would I suggest Casey has proffered or been offered.
I was speaking speculatively, and as they say in my former profession, ” making a forward thinking statement..”
I am not saying I agree with this or not, but what if the state learns something from the defendant that removes “malice aforethought” as you put it. Strictly putting all the cards on the table if you will.
B
Blink, How could the state possible consider a defense of accident or no forethought…how would they know she was telling the truth? When Casey’s history says she does not know how to?
#1429 – Blink, All I can type while crumpled in this heap is WHEW!!! My thoughts addressing the “what ifs” are forming as I pick myself up. Poor spouse is wondering where the drink landed…one usually follows the other.
Blot twice first, sorry
B
Chica, #1397 Rest assured, there is much more evidence against Casey than there was against Scott. The similarities of the two cases just blow me away, and right down to the ravenous hunger of both of their attorneys for media attention and fame, though I tend to think that poor Baez will come out of this looking far more foolish than he could ever be proven competent. Unless he pulls a Johnny Cochran and can come up with a glove, Casey’s doomed.
Any ideas on what Baez’s glove might be?
Long day ahead, gotta get movin’.
O, and thanks Blink for the support on the Dora theory. I do believe it’s key, though some do not, not at this point in time anyway, and considering the fact that the State holds back the best for last, I can’t wait! And by the way, I’m not yet convinced there are NO latents from Casey.
Blessings,
Gavi
Question, if they can link back to Baez’s IP address that Casey was in his office and maintaining that My Space page of Zenaida, wouldn’t Baez get in big trouble for this?
#1429 – Blink
“…I am not saying I agree with this or not, but what if the state learns something from the defendant that removes “malice aforethought” as you put it. Strictly putting all the cards on the table if you will.”
B
********************
Okay, Blink
Speculating, of course, I think the state is so damn disgusted with this broad (don’t need an urban dictionary to know it’s a slur—I’m just beginning to see Casey as one, sorry) that they’d be hard pressed to consider ANY leniency for ANY information after what Casey has done to the OCSO, the FBI, the SAO, the ME, the thousands of volunteers and those, like you, who have literally altered your lives in pursuit of justice for this little girl, and the millions, like me, who, unable to assist in or impact the assurance of justice, embrace, love and pray, pray, pray for peace for this toddler who , it seems, never had a chance.
And of course, our agony pales next to the horror Caylee’s wanton mother wreaked on her daughter, not only in her death, but for six needless months while that baby’s flesh was picked apart by animals and vegetation grew out of her scattered bones and through the garbage bags she was thrown away in.
Graphic? Yes, and I’m truly sorry. But I don’t think the SAO has compiled documents totaling five figures (and counting!) with the expectation that they’re willing to settle for anything less than the ultimate justice. And why would they?
The evidence we’ve been privy to so far shows no one other than Casey had the desire, DESIRE to rid herself of a three-year albatross (it can’t have been a picnic being with child while trying to remain her size 4 figure). “Malice aforethought” (ty btw) at this point, is as easy to remove as adhesive on duct tape. Duct tape found in strips ATTACHED to Caylee’s skull. It’s been determined it was placed there prior to her death, and though I don’t know how they can possibly determine that, the SAO appears confident it will fly. Yea to forensics!
I know it’s everybody’s job to do what they do, and if it weren’t Caylee, it’d be someone else, but no one, and I mean NO ONE is looking to do any favors for this emotionless waste of space. I would like to know what possible information could be gleaned from Casey at this point that would earn her a reduced sentence. Anything! Anything at all!
Casey is a user and a taker, and though it’s heartbreaking that it was Caylee who paid the price with her life to simply forward her mother’s agenda, the truth is it could have been anyone, as Casey’s lack of moral fiber and her self-absorption makes her a menace to society, someone who anyone would and SHOULD be afraid of, yes AFRAID to be around lest they interfere in her quest for ????? Who knows what her goal is, but whatever, she will lie, steal, and MURDER to get there. Apparently, even being a family member doesn’t give you immunity from the danger that is Casey.
Malice aforethought–it’s there to stay. Reduced sentence, not so much.
She’s toast, probably the only other FACT not yet inked.
Speculating, of course.
p.s. sorry about “damn”. Asterisk’s just weren’t bring the point home. I’ll keep it in check-promise.
oh, and “broad” is out of my system, too.
Do you think that it is possible that this photo was given to Jose and it was just a oops! on the Casey and/or the Anthony’s that gave him the picture, that Jose or one of them sold it my mistake.
Responnse to Comment by Gavriella
thanks for the reassurance that they have more on casey than they had on scott peterson, sometimes we wonder and our faith wavers. I just want justice for this little girl. I go to bed nightly thinking of her and praying for justice.
I have never seen anything like the likes of the anthonys family its just beyond bazaar.
god bless
chica
What the …. Hey!
http://www.sydneytheatre.com.au/2009/tot-mom
Will George, Cindy, Lee and Mallory be in attendance? Will they be compensated?
Geez oh pete, now Kronk has been fired.
Caylee, Haleigh, and now an infant that couldn’t crawl or walk has disappeared in Florida…what is going on in that state? I mean, seriously, these high profile murdered/missing children seem to all be located in Florida…anyone got any theorys?!?
more missing kids in florida than anywhere else or is it we just aint hearing of others. I know aint aint a word sorry. lol’
I know this is set aside due to the new doc dump that just came out but while looking back at ricardos interviews (looking for chloroform references) I came accross a interview in Nov 08 where Ricardo was questioned about the contents of his pc,specifically emails that went back and forth to Sharon at the Globe and how some of the emails appeared to be deleted. Eric Edwards asks Ricardo if he was trying to cover up the fact that he sold pics to the Globe and Ricardo says he’s not hiding anything , that its no secret that he sold photos to the Globe. Blink ,do you still think that the person that sold these photos had knowledge that Caylee would be found in the same t-shirt or is it possible that these are the only photos Ricardo had because they were taken at his place?
Yes, I believe those photos in particular were sold for that reason.
B