Casey/Caylee Anthony Case: Caylee Pic in The “Big Trouble” T- SOLD TO THE GLOBE BEFORE Remains Found?
Disclaimer– exclusive
BREAKING NEWS
Orlando, Fl– In the recent depositions by the State Attorneys Office in the case against Casey Anthony one common exhibit was noted in each deposition of George, Lee and Cindy Anthony.
A cropped version of a photo of Caylee wearing the tshirt that is believed recovered with her remains.
All 3 Anthony’s claimed to not have seen this picture before previously, although without being prompted, Lee noted the photo was cropped.
How then, did it get in the hands of The Globe? Could this be the evidence removed from the Anthony home that Jose Baez tells Cindy Anthony to “Zip It” during her testimony and objects to information he considered sealed by the judge?
This edition of the Globe was released October 8, 2008. Six days before Casey Anthony was indicted for murder and remanded to jail without bond.
THE SALE OF THIS PHOTO PRE-DATES THE RECOVERY OF CAYLEE MARIE ANTHONY FROM THE WOODS OFF SUBURBAN DRIVE.
One could make the leap that the person selling it would have had knowledge of what she was wearing when 34 month old Caylee Marie met her tragic end.
(EDITORS NOTE: Don’t even try the picture was sold at the yardsale with the clothes and laundry bag– PUHLEASE..)
Blinkoncrime.com poster “Justice 23” contributed to this report.
Related Posts
Related Posts:
1,441 Comments
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
Wow! When I opened Blink’s site today all I could think is Wow! Thank you to justice23 and Blink for your sluething skills and thought-provoking analysis. The ominous questions that need to be answered regarding this photo are completely different then the ones I was asking. But thank goodness those who are asking these questions are much more adept at finding the answers than I. Thanks Just Wow! Momof3
Hi everyone,
I’ve been buggered all night!
I just want to throw this out there for some feedback.
My hubby is tired of hearing about this case.(poor guy)
Clues????????
THE TATTOO is Caylee related (we are told)
* bella vita? = high life/beautiful life…
* 3 stars – one not lit…
* KC got the Tattoo July 3 2008 (possibly the very day
that CA posted the message to KC about the “angel from above”)
* Caylee loved to go out at night per JoJo and point to/look
at the stars.
Could KC be referring to Caylee living the high life? In the heavens?
Are the stars there for Caylee? Is the unlit star the clue?
Or is it the two lit stars that stand for something we haven’t thought about.
ALSO…
ZFG22- the imaginanny
ZFG22 myspace picture- Dora (the explorer)
Could the picture chosen as ZFG’s profile pic
have anything to do with Caylee as well?
The picture chosen was Dora the Explorer. Why?
Why not a white dog? ZFG had one right?
or a Puerto Rican Flag? ZFG’s homeland right?
If I was going to make a fake myspace I would use a pic that made someone appear more real. Not less real.
Dora has to be a clue!
* We know Caylee was in Mt. Dora June 15,2008
* We know CA questioned KC while she was in jail
about Mt. Dora
Does the profile pic chosen have any significance to the case?
Could it be that ZFG is really someone else? Related to Mt. Dora?
Also Juliette Lewis, there isn’t one BUT
she is an actress who is well known for staring
in the movie “Cape Fear”.
Does the plot of this movie have anything to do with
this case? probably not… GA was a homocide “cop”
The plot was also about a cheating husband… Not saying
GA did, I was not there but haven’t we been led to believe he did?
Back to “Bella Vita” I cannot shake the feeling that
somehow this ties into a movie I saw a while ago called
“A BEAUTIFUL MIND”
BUT maybe that is because that was the strangest movie
I’ve ever seen and I stayed completely confused until the end!
It was a BIOGRAPHY so clearly people can be that “off” in
real life.
As unlikely as it seems there still have to be clues that we are missing.
I SAY who needs a lie detector!!!
Give an IQ TEST TO EVERYONE INVOLVED!!!
Do a bait and switch…
Tell them whoever has highest IQ must be involved.
The person that scores the lowest is so intelligent they will alter the answers they give in order to not look guilty of concocting the coverup.
Is it possible to fake dumb?
Those with high to average IQ’s are completely innocent of involvement.
I don’t know my IQ- But I’d bet it isn’t good.
Does anyone here know their IQ? and if you do, do you tell people?
or keep it quiet?
oh well back to sleuthin…
#75 Sal
I’m starting to see what Blink was really getting at now. So basically what you’re both saying is that Casey didn’t sell this picture thinking it would actually help the State successfully prosecute her, but to actually help her BS story when and if Caylee was found to incriminate someone else, i.e. Jesse, or whomever they’re going to go after during trial, yes? Hmm … that makes a lot of sense now … wasn’t completely getting it before, but with that being said, didn’t Casey think that maybe, just maybe with the shirt as well as all the things found in HER car also found at the remains site (think infamous pizza box here for one), that that would be a really stupid move? Uh … guessing someone hadn’t had their complete dose of caffeine yet the morning this got decided, me thinks.
Blink-I like your site too.
Possible photo time frame Jan 08 – March 08?????
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/1678887/Casey-Anthony-Facebook-Myspace-Photobucket-Photos
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/1694915/Casey-Anthony-BBQ-Party-Photos-January-2008
Didn’t Kiomarie and/or another old friend of Casey’s sell her story to the Globe or the National Enquirer?
I feel stupid– I did not read enough of MarinadeDave to know he was an Anthony supporter. Duh– I bought into that partly because Shelley (from here and from Second Life) had asked him to do the videos, or more videos.
I didn’t see either, that Ms. Joy Wray was seated in behind him, both presenting to the camera at the hearing. I thought MarinadeDave was showing how the body could be missed in all that Kudzu– maybe he’s been on their side all along? What is behind his work?
Speaking of Second Life and the CSI lab– has that lasted? Anyone use it? I checked it out, but did not stay long, it was a contradiction in terms IMHO– real life uses for a fantasy world– it has to be one or either and not a mix of both because you must know what is real, what is not. This topic is real, not fantasy.
#78 redhat
“Also, could the Globe pic deal be the $14000 deal that Casey was telling Tony about? …and the source of payments to Baez?”
LOL … well, if that IS true, that $14,000 is already way LONG gone with attorneys like LKB (Linda Tripp clone), Dr. Henry “Contaminating evidence? I don’t know what you mean” Lee, Andrea Cryin’ Lyon and Todd Macaloser on her case. So where did all the other money come from? Or isn’t there any left, period? Have defense funds yet run out at this point? Wasn’t there speculation that eventually the funds will have dried up and all the major players mentioned here would be gone? If not yet, then soon hopefully? Although it seems like Andrea is in it for the long haul now with her Mommy Dearest role. Ugh … gag!
damn it I am still needin some spell check
P. 498 Cindy part 2
Is this the photo with Caylee in the pink shirt with Casey mentioned in this depo? Is this where you were refering, Blink, to Baez telling Cindy to zip it?
yes
B
There are three J.C. Penny stores in Orlando according to Google. They all have hair salons in the store.
Did they ever get those receipts?
LOL “almost hot-nellied in my pants”…not sure what that is..but sounds like a towel is needed. LOL
Blink- I’d hate to play poker with you- you beat me hands down with your cards close to your chest.
I love you guys- you’re all so doggone smart. Momof3 also must have had a intuition this picture was very important in some manner- good job to her.
Any word on Christine Sheddy? I know- wrong thread- but I think of her so often/and her mom. An update on the Chris Coleman murders. Sheri’s family is suing Joyce Meyer Ministries in the wrongful deaths lawsuit. Wondering if that one will go to trial about the same time as Casey.
Back to lurking in TOTAL awe.
#79 westsidehudsen
“Well, if I recall correctly, in one of the releases, the prosecution says that this shirt was INTENTIONALLY put on Caylee. That seems to hit on a few levels now.”
Yes they did. I’ve been wondering about that statement too. HOW would they actually know this for sure? LE isn’t really allowed to speculate in a case, especially in regard to evidence, right? Don’t they have to have something to actually back it up? And how pray tell would they do that in this case? Unless they’ve secretly hooked up something to Casey’s head and monitored her thought processes or something against her will … how would they possibly be able to prove this? Statement from someone close to Casey at one time that we haven’t seen released yet? Sorry … I just keep going back to that … my bad. That feeling just won’t go away though …
wow their discussion over the picture question goes on until page 510! and they talk about spilling the beans??
Aug 7th Marinade Dave has picture on his site
http://marinadedave.wordpress.com/2009/08/07/sex-lies-videotape-actually-its-photos-maps-and-e-mails/
Let’s be distinct, please. The CROPPED pic are you referring to?
The cropped pic has been around, that is correct. However, this is the first correlation to the Globe piece and the date of it’s appearance.
B
Oh My! They just posted a color picture over on Scared Monkeys of the laundry bag Caylee was found in. It breaks my heart to see this. How in heavens name could Cindy have looked at this picture during the depositions and not broken down? How could she possibly have maintained her composure?? I just don’t understand.
# 80 “jaden’s gmom is not a friend of the anthony’s
She is however a online supporter of Rg Grund.”
Okay, so either we can deduce that she got the photo from the Grunds, quite innocently, and they had nothing to do with the sale? Or the Grunds were the ones who sold it? Or the Anthonys knew that this was a photo that the Grunds had taken (they had a copy), Casey knew what shirt Caylee was left in, or the shirt was left later, and so it was sold to a tabloid by Casey? And somehow it would tie things back to Jesse?
My head is spinning.
ASIDE: did anyone ever locate this website that was created to damage the Grunds reputation (that Lee was asked if he knew about in his depo)?
shizza…Kleat can we talk….dang it I need you right now…westside where are you? I need some phone numbers to have a one on one, look I will call and pay the bill I just need some understanding i am going Age Sh!t hehehe
Why the masculine form in Signor**bella? Grund is Italian.
P. 497
A:Casey and Caylee playing in 2007
Q: When specifically
A: Probably– it was before Caylee’s second birthday. Right around Caylee’s second birthday, but before that
Q; how do you know that?
A; Casey’s hairstyle, Caylee’s hair and–
Q; did you take that picture?
A: Yes
Q: you still have the original I believe?
A; I don’t know if it is on the camera the sheriff’s department has.
oh hell here we go again spell check…I meant Ape Sh!t…. hahahhaha I am off to bed you all have fun I will catch you in the morning.
Blink keep doing your thing Girl!
Kleat you lost me here
‘I… Killlll…. Jessss—-eeeee’ Very strange….
P. 498
The witness; And just for the record, the only document I recognize on this is the –
Mr. Baez: Cindy, don’t don’t don’t
The witness: No I just want to make sure, because–
Mr. Baez: Cindy, no no
The witness: — we stopped– ok?
Mr. Baez: Cindy you can’t go into anything
The witness: Well, I was cut halfway off, and, sorry-
Mr. Conway: Thats alright
Mr. Baez: Zip it
SS: Can you imagine an attorney, WHO DOES NOT REPRESENT YOU, telling you to zip it?
B
Marinade Dave got to shake Mr. Anthony’s hand the other day. He was very proud of himself for that, so I wondered if he was an Anthony supporter. He seems like a fair guy but he sure goes out of his way to protect the very people that get on TV and dig their holes a little deeper.
Still I read there ONLY….just to get a chuckle at how blind people that are sympathetic to the Anthony’s are.
This is from the transcript of Casey’s interview right after she was indicted and arrested. She always seems to slip and give up details. Check out this statement:
“When people are only getting their information from the Nancy Grace’s or from GLOBE MAGAZINE or People or you know stuff like that.”
This was 10/14/08 and this was on the cover of the 10/20/08 issue.
Does anyone know what the content of the article was that accompanied that photo? Maybe that could be a clue.
Also, whoever mentioned Kio selling her story, could she have gotten this?
Did the Anthonys ever use this photo on the Caylee site?
# 112 Soulsister
Is that Cindy’s transcript? Don’t you think that it relates to the photo with Casey on the floor holding Caylee overhead. I think it was also a video. That quote seems to describe the photo I just mentioned vs the one posted here. She isn’t really playing with Casey in the Globe shot.
Soulsister #112
That part of Cindy’s depo that you quoted is referring to another picture that she was shown. It’s the pic where Casey as Caylee on her knees doing the airplane thingy you do with kids.
Yes, thanks for noting that Sal
B
Excuse me, Granmomma, Mr. Dave, is not an Anthony supporter. He spoke to Mr. Anthony said his sorrow for their loss, spoke alittle about the Green Bean story and shook his hand. I think that was being a gentleman with manners. He is fair in his reporting. I can not speak for him, I believe he believes we do not have to walk in the Anthony’s shoes.
‘zip it’– yes I wondered what all that is about– the state and Baez and Cindy all knowing she should not ‘elaborate’. Cindy seems hard to control.
This might be a reach– but Cindy used the term ‘Zip’ drive for what seemed to me to be a reference to a ‘FLASH’ drive– a small capture device on a keychain. I don’t know if Zip is used interchangeably for ‘flash’ or not, re: small memory devices. (I thought a ‘zip drive’ was specific, but then I might be thinking for Mac, vs pc)
Could Baez have been hinting to Cindy with his use of ‘zip it’ as a reference to what she called her or Casey’s ‘zip drive’ and it’s contents? She made a huge fuss of the ‘zip drive’ in her discussion with Yuri’s boss over that ‘luncheon’ date).
LOL Blink!! Thats funny! Why is this discussion of the picture sealed– grand jury testimony sealed? is this to be released?
124 comments within a few short morning hours…. this must be a Blink record….
thank you sal!
“SS: Can you imagine an attorney, WHO DOES NOT REPRESENT YOU, telling you to zip it?”
Blink.
I don’t think he is a wordsmith. He uses colloquialisms often, but that may actually be good for a jury, it gives him the “regular-guy persona”.
He may not represent her (in a legal sense), but clearly he does represent her! (Monty Python: nudge nudge, say no more)
oh so its about the shorts??
These comments are growing so fast today.
Kleat: re: bruise under left eye in photo—it took some time but I found a reference to Ricardo Morales and a picture of Casey and Caylee on his sofa, which he said was taken on Jan 23, 2008, and he said in his statement that Caylee had fallen against a table.
So, if Casey had told people that RM’s apartment was the Nanny’s apartment (but got called on it pretty fast), that would put the bruise under Caylee’s left eye as happening at the nanny’s apt. (?) Apparently Caylee was still wearing that t shirt at the end of Jan.
If someone else already found this: sorry for repeating it. I did not find the picture of the two of them on the sofa that RM was talking about. Will keep looking. It shows the same bruise as in this new picture.
Kleat – respectfully I think you’re totally misrepresenting Marinade Dave’s site. He just doesn’t allow bashing of the Anthony’s or the other players – a couple of whom comment on his site. He is not pro or anti anybody. And I for one am glad to have this site and Dave’s site – its so much better than the echo chamber of seeing who can make up the most derogatory twists on these people’s names and their physical appearance. That stuff gets real old real fast. There are enough supposed justice for Caylee sites that do that. I love that both Blink and Dave keep that to a minimum with the occasional slip up allowed.
Sorry, maybe you need to be distinct, because I have no idea what you are talking about with the cropped picture. I was just trying to give information about what the other poster was talking about. I was not expecting to be put down for not being distinct enough. To me a link is distinct.
Eyes, my apologies, I most certainly was not putting you down. I was not clear what or who you were responding to.
Thanks for the explanation.
B
Comment by soulsister — October 20, 2009 @ 2:50 pm
P. 498
The witness; And just for the record, the only document I recognize on this is the –
Mr. Baez: Cindy, don’t don’t don’t
The witness: No I just want to make sure, because–
Mr. Baez: Cindy, no no
The witness: — we stopped– ok?
Mr. Baez: Cindy you can’t go into anything
The witness: Well, I was cut halfway off, and, sorry-
Mr. Conway: Thats alright
Mr. Baez: Zip it
SS: Can you imagine an attorney, WHO DOES NOT REPRESENT YOU, telling you to zip it?
B
please tell me how this happens
Just WHO was the ‘SECRET BOMBSHELL WITNESS’ that the other Casey story headline implies… (found low on the photo headline)??
Will we see that person soon now? Do they have the story with photos, ‘ready to go’ on a moments notice from the ‘Joint Defense”???
(Brad’s role vs Baez– Brad is ‘fluff’– and a bit of money negotiating– but his role is obviously ‘fluff’, Baez is the real director of his clients as we see from Cindy’s depo– but Brad does try, as his objection is ‘answer if you know’ following the leader Baez’s ‘objection to the form of the question’– seems to me the state’s preamble was not ‘feeding’ the witness, but giving context before the question (would like a legal view of that– what was really going on with the control of witnesses between Baez and Conway).
Sorry Brad, you are ‘icing’. Hopefully you will have a real role for your clients besides babysitter and media deflector and photo money negotiator for client holidays vs Puerto Rico searches for the baby.
According to Marinade’s site, the cropped picture of Caylee was released in the August 7 document release. I had seen it before and knew it had been around. When did it appear on Jaydengmom site? Was this before or after it was released by the prosecution?
# 139-dee
He is allowed to protect “sealed info”.
Hi Annie……thanks for clearing that up. Because we have all seen what happens to people that seem to be Anthony supporters…..
LOOK OUT HERE COMES THE BUS……….lol
deederma, thanks!! good work– (and yes, it’s really hard to keep up– that will be for a late night read)
Jan 28. 2008 narrows it– and to Cindy’s FBI meeting on video– Cindy went into quite length about that little ‘poke’ bruise, table falling story, relating it to potential ‘abuse’ theories about Casey– deflecting these as vigorously as she could. (one protesteth TOO much was my impression at the time– like so many ‘Cindy’ topics often elaborated for no reason– but for what she knew to prepare for)
dee
Good find with the bruise and Ricardos apartment. Was it really as far back as January? I thought that she was seeing him later. But it all starts to meld together after awhile.
I thought Ricardo was the lover du jour right before Tony. Wasn’t Tony started in late May?
Sorry Blink, I didn’t realize, honestly that I went over the line. Got my knickers in a bunch over what I felt was an insult to me and others commenting on another site. I usually have thicker skin. I have commented here before, but not in a long time.
lol, no problem, happens to me on occasion as well.
Un bunch and thanks for sharing in the conversation.
B
lily, I’ll leave that up to you to figure out as you listen to the little ‘breakfast Caylee’ video– it’s easy to find on YouTube, just plug in that description. Better to see what you think independently. Look at it, but then also play it without watching… you might need to repeat a few times.
Question:
Would the Globe tell LE their source?( And the legal arrangement with that source?)Even with a subpoena?
Or would they say they are ‘protecting their source?’?
Can this information be compelled?
( Or should it be..?)
Legal minds, please comment…!
Thanks Lily, re the Marinade Dave explanation– yes, that makes sense– if you allow both sides, some will say you are a supporter of only one side or the other. Anthony’s and defense as one side, the ‘state’ on the other.
(but the STATE is ON CAYLEE”S SIDE and have stated that publicly AND ON THE RECORD as distinct from the ‘family’ now in the last hearing. Seems, it’s the Anthony’s vs CAYLEE now)
ArgentinaRose– but the t-shirt was in the photo, the photo relates to a photo taken in Jan 2008, the photo was published in October 2008. Doesn’t sound like the shirt was purchased after Caylee died.
(Unless the shirt was purchased to duplicate one maybe thrown out or ‘garage saled’ earlier– Cindy did say she was working her way through some of Caylee’s clothes that were too small, but hadn’t done them all — talking about when the child was still with them, of course) Maybe another shirt in a larger size was purchased later IF they planned to tie an earlier ‘gift’ to Caylee to the disappearance and body if found.