Casey/Caylee Anthony Case: Caylee Pic in The “Big Trouble” T- SOLD TO THE GLOBE BEFORE Remains Found?
Disclaimer– exclusive original content copyright and property of Internet Network News, LLC and Blinkoncrime.com. Reproduction of this article , ANY OF IT’S CONTENTS, in whole or in part without proper attribution and source link is strictly prohibited without prior written permission.
BREAKING NEWS
Orlando, Fl– In the recent depositions by the State Attorneys Office in the case against Casey Anthony one common exhibit was noted in each deposition of George, Lee and Cindy Anthony.
A cropped version of a photo of Caylee wearing the tshirt that is believed recovered with her remains.
All 3 Anthony’s claimed to not have seen this picture before previously, although without being prompted, Lee noted the photo was cropped.
How then, did it get in the hands of The Globe? Could this be the evidence removed from the Anthony home that Jose Baez tells Cindy Anthony to “Zip It” during her testimony and objects to information he considered sealed by the judge?
This edition of the Globe was released October 8, 2008. Six days before Casey Anthony was indicted for murder and remanded to jail without bond.
THE SALE OF THIS PHOTO PRE-DATES THE RECOVERY OF CAYLEE MARIE ANTHONY FROM THE WOODS OFF SUBURBAN DRIVE.
One could make the leap that the person selling it would have had knowledge of what she was wearing when 34 month old Caylee Marie met her tragic end.
(EDITORS NOTE: Don’t even try the picture was sold at the yardsale with the clothes and laundry bag– PUHLEASE..)
Blinkoncrime.com poster “Justice 23” contributed to this report.
Related Posts
Related Posts:
1,441 Comments
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
Signorinabella is not Grund and The way Cropped photo was found was via a clicking a persons myspace page{Jadensgmom} via Rg’s page.
Just basically a boring day clicking links on his page after reading his blog.Clicked her page ,checked out photos ,noticed it because I never seen it ever before online.Then a few days later docs came out ,describing letters on shirt and I remembered the photo and where I seen it! Sent to Yuri same day.
Again that lady is the only one who can say where she found it,I never asked her.
When those bangs were trimmed for that photo vs the photo at Ricardo’s– IIRC, a photo with the bruise was taken with Caylee wearing a head scarf/bandana– (IIRC)– will have to look that up, as I don’t recall short trimmed bangs as in the Globe photo. (Caylee’s bangs were very long and pulled away from her face in the ‘Zanny apartment photo– Ricardo’s apt with the drum/burgandy curtains, and teeth clenched posed ‘say cheeze’ for photo)
Blink and Justice — Congratulations and thanks for this scoop!!! I checked a few minutes ago and only saw it mentioned on SM — no news release yet. You are way ahead of the pack! I love this site!!!
Gotta go help lay floor in the basement before going back to work tomorrow, but will check back later. Can’t wait to see what new ideas, news and theories everyone comes up with.
Well, I will refrain from going to Dave’s site because now I am a fool. I was only going by the comment that Kleat left about him being an Anthony supporter. I only heard of Marinade Dave when the SL was created here, and then when I saw the Judge call him up the other day, I figured he could be another good read. There’s no one that comes here and comments that are sympathetic to the Anthony’s and I figured it would be a good thing to finally get another view of the case. BUT, what a FOOL I was to think that…..well, atleast, according to Dave.
Gran, Kleat has clarified her comments graciously.
I do recommend reading at marinade Dave’s site, and any other site you are comfortable.
Mr. Marinade (feels odd to say that) has down a very good job being objective on this case, maybe even moreso than I, and I respect him for that.
I take a slight exception to the fact that no one comes here with sympathy for the Anthony’s, it is simply not true. If you look you will find it. I just believe most find them to be adults with the faculties to make choices, as opposed to their granddaughter, whose choice, if you will, was made for her by her Mother.
B
One thing Cindy said that is true. Casey’s hair grows very fast. Any photos with Casey and Caylee together would be pretty easy to pin down to a time line. Especially if there was a color change at a certain point during the ‘ugly coping”.
Thanks for reminding me what was in that photo, all I really noticed was the bruise and curtains. So that was the drum photo too?
I have unbunched! But I am Casey-Anthonied out today!
Lol, fair enough!
B
I know this comment has nothing to do with the topic at hand, but…
I was just doing some reading elsewhere
– and I am just now figuring out where the Zenaida and Gonzalez names come from.
They were the last names of the neighbors that backed up to the woods where Caylee was found.
Incredible.
And dumb.
havent read the recent depos, started but threw my hands up at cindy again,then the cruise,then i check in here and bombshell, justice23 and blink,it stuck out in the docs that the state said t-shirt could be premeditated but your link to the mag photo,omg! i’ve been thinking that premedition is starting to show imo,if morgan could show link to casey knowing zenaida was at or would be at sawgrass, shows imo premeditation.now the t-shirt seems(as per other comments)to be possible grund implication,i mention in earlier post the words on the t-shirt,could in a stretch,tie in rev grund as he post in his blog in bold caps I AM TROUBLE,casey could have gotten her idea to implicate jesse & dad right off his my space(there are lots of other symbolisms ie: the snake),i mention this again as appears there might be a tie in between the g’s and the photo. just further evidence of casey trying to implicate others which imo adds to weight of dp.BUT ,i ‘m wondering, i thought the docs had a photo of caylee wearing the shorts found w/remains cant find?
Kleat – I was so happy to see the state STAND UP FOR Caylee. And do it with such force and grace – finally someone said it out loud – in court – in front of the family and everyone.
I apologize if this has been addressed already. It seems this photo is obviously significant. Can it be used against Casey…selling this photo with the knowledge or belief that Caylee would found? That leads me back to the premeditation angle (along with the duct tape). Very articulate, contrived behaviour on Casey’s part. I would also think the Nanny non sense could be put to rest with this photo. Am I way off on this? I know I should leave it to the pros.
Absolutely it can. There is zero doubt in my mind if this photo can be tied to Casey or anyone in that family it will be huge.
B
re: bruise under eye: here is a link to what I believe was Morales apt (“Zanny apt”) photo:
http://www.clickorlando.com/2009/0602/19638179_120X67.jpg
It’s a small pic but shows bruise under right eye (not left eye). Also shows date “June 2 2008″
Also, my opinion only, KC in Globe photo appears to be wearing the deep blue-colored dress in which she appears in many of the Fusion photos. The sleeve may not be the same – a bit higher on the shoulder in Fusion pics but could be distortion or even photoshopping on Globe cover. She appears to have same haircut, make-up and general look of that time frame.
#139 Dee
I’m not her attorney and I would be more than thrilled to tell Cindy to zip it. How gratifying that would be
After an exhaustive day – this is the nonsense I come home to. Why does the media take a thousand photos of Casey and then print the one photo taken during a humorous moment. This is not a laughing matter – and these attempts of tainting the jury pool by cherry picking what is presented to the public will not stand. This media and Persecution have utilized this form of propaganda for over a year. The public has now been effectively brainwashed and is incapable of objective judgment. We are beyond a change in venue and are talking mistrial.
Wake up sheeple and demand justice for Casey AND Caylee.
God Bless
OrlandoEAST (10/16/2009, 5:16 PM )
Heh?
Conversely, how does the media, ( in this case one outlet) produce a picture of Caylee in the tshirt she is found with amongst her remains, that nobody in her family has ever seen. Funny, I dont recall such a post when this issue came out?
B
#20 Comment by Silent observer
Hi Every
I have a question can someone please
Is it possible that her agent could have been her attorney Mr Jose Baez?
And if this is so will this person’s identity be made public. It’s dispicable the manner in which these individuals can dirty and taint the memory of this little girl.
back to my loft
It definately was, or he is at least aware.
B
This made me think about Jose’s daughter Christine that he hired this past summer for Media relations (someone posted this awhile back) Could it be Christine that worked with the Globe on the defence’s behalf? Would this be why the complaints against Baez have not been proven because it isn’t Jose directly negotiating or selling photos/videos?- Momof3
Blink,
#51
If striped shorts were not on the body, what was she wearing on the bottom?
Found on here in “Autopsy Revelations Part I article”
B
I was shocked that Cindy would tolerate the Baez rebuke especially considering the supposed “bad blood” bwtween them. He certainly seemed insistent on shutting her down tho.
Did anyone else notice LE’s question during Cindy’s testimony regarding great Grandmother Plesea’s hair? seemed rather odd to me.
Before things get out of hand, please let me say I am an avid supporter of Blink and her site. She is the best in the business and she is a most gracious host and ally in the search for truth. She treats everyone with respect and I have nothing but admiration for her.
I have 2 points to make:
I would not jump the gun on the photograph in question. Yes, it was a great find and there may be something to it. I am a skeptic, though, and that shouldn’t be taken as an insult to anyone. It has been my nature since before I was bald and God only knows how many arguments have ensued at my own site because of it. Fortunately, I never had to tear my hair out by its roots.
I have never been an Anthony lover or supporter. Now, it’s my understanding from reading comments here that I was seated near Joy Wray and I must have been on a date with her or something. Call it courting. Let me tell you, not only did I not know the woman until later that morning, after the hearing, I never knew she was seated behind me. The last photograph I saw of her was when she was a blonde. Until Friday, when we ran into each other at the parking garage as I went back to retrieve my video camera, I didn’t know her. When we met, I still didn’t know who she was until she told me her name.
As for loving the Anthonys or supporting them, absolutely not. For one thing, they are not on trial, but more importantly, I have always been a supporter of manners. All my life. Because I hate it when people use stupid names I left behind when I entered 3rd grade, I don’t allow name calling on my site. Maybe a little. I have no clue why people have branded me this way, but please don’t do that. This is precisely what I mean. It’s hurtful and it creates problems that just aren’t there.
Thank you, Blink.
Dearest Marinade Dave,
Thank you for your kind words and I promise I will try my best to continue to be worthy of them. I am new to your site, but I already love it. I felt as though I was in court with you Friday, and prior to that I was riding along side you during your many trips to Wal Mart to prove out the TechBuy Guy theory. I also know that my friend Angela has recently met your aquaintance and speaks highly of you as well ( I trust her above many).
How gracious of you to clarify a position you really should not have had to, and I could not agree with you more.
It is my opinion if one cannot articulate their viewpoint without insulting someone, their viewpoint is not worthy of my, or my readers time. Regardless of one’s opinions in this case, I do believe we all share one commonality.
Justice for Caylee, in whatever way the man upstairs ultimately sees fit to orchestrate here and there.
On the bald thing, my Daddy had 3 daughters, he went bald in thirds he will tell you, and I think he is the most handsome man in the whole wide world (with deference to Mr. Blink and Blink Jr, you understand.)
On dating Joy Wray, I dont know your personal situation, but common sense tells me that your a gentleman of discern and that is a non-issue. I want you to know out of respect for you, I just put that in the nicest way possible (wrt JW).
With deep respect and admiration,
Blink
One of the evidence photos appears to be of a stained rug and I was wondering if it could be from the porch. I have never seen it discussed anywhere so I thought maybe I was mistaken but I do not know what else it could be. So I will throw the link out here and let the experts tell me what it is.
Go to photo 56/79 at the following; http://media.myfoxorlando.com/photogalleries/100909caseyanthonyphotosofducttapeclothingshovel/indexGallery.htm
It is marked as Q215. Also if it is from the porch then would it be from the front or the back porch? Lastly, does anyone know which body fluids react to the reagents the investigators would have used?
redhat, is Cindy asking about the hairdresser because of the news reports that said a hairdresser said she saw bruises on Caylee (including an eye scrape, similar to the one in the Globe photo—she has them from time to time under either eye in the photos we have seen)? Plus somebody gave Yuri M. a cellphone photo showing some bruises.
I don’t think the Globe photo is from a cellphone because even though it’s not a super high resolution photo, to blow it up that large without it being totally grainy suggests that it had to be a bit higher res than a cellphone provides.
And I’m thinking that it really was just the lightening or brightening of the photo by the “cropper” that made the bruise fade a bit, as in the other thread I think it was our own Gavriella who spotted the bruise under her eye in the cropped photo.
#46
Blink, how can the defense run with the nanny, Caylee being alive in Puerto Rico and Jesse being involved? It would appear Jose and co. are still undecisive about how to present their case. Are these possibilities any stronger than a mother who doesn’t report her daughter missing for 31 days, gets a very questionable cryptic tattoo, shows no sense of emotion or urgency in finding her daughter, lies to detectives about where she works, steals, parties after the fact, can prove there is no nanny etc etc etc. Anything against Jesse would be far less circumstantial than Casey’s situation, or am I way off yet again?
#117 westsidehudsen
“ASIDE: did anyone ever locate this website that was created to damage the Grunds reputation (that Lee was asked if he knew about in his depo)?”
I don’t know the exact website, but IIRC, the name of the group was called, “Team Caylee” and there were allegedly quite a few people involved with this group, supposedly quite a few mothers/grandmothers themselves actually according to Richard himself from what I can remember. Quite stunning if you think about the dynamics of this case. Why any mother/grandmother could actually think Casey and the Anthony’s were innocent enough to actually go after the Grund’s tooth and nail is beyond me. Many of RG’s supporters wanted him to go after the “Team” for slander in a lawsuit, but I don’t know whatever became of that … that was last summer before Caylee was ever officially found during all the searches I believe, but could have been shortly after.
I can see how this picture with this shirt would bring big money for whoever sold it.
But what I don’t get is how the person who sold it could convince the buyer of its worth BEFORE Caylee was found. Unless he/she tipped his/her hand prior to that find.
Blink – Are you suggesting that in the selling of this photo it was revealed to the Globe that there was particular significance to this photo? Would they not then be obligated to contact LE with this information?
I can see a scenario where they create the hypotheticals, you know, only LE has this information because only the kidnappers would know what she had on, blah blah.
B
I, too, would be interested in the article that accompanies that headline.
Anyone?
Guess we can submit a bid.
Is it possible for LE to track down where the pink tshirt was sold in Orlando an who may have purchased it? Now the questions regarding where Caylees clothes were purchased make sense.
Is anyone here in law enforcement? Has anyone here discussed this case with someone in LE (not involved in the case, of course)? I’d be very curious as to what a cop or detective might have to say.
Thanks ~
#61, WestSide: Are you saying that a good friend would have ignored the $700-plus in check thefts? Imagining myself as a near-broke young woman striking out on my own, I don’t think I could be so forgiving. The thief would have to have a damn good reason.
I also wonder if Amy did not press charges at the encouragement of LE.
Thoughts?
#64 Clockwatcher
I vote for Door Number 4. UNBELIEVABLE Just when I thought things were getting a bit boring.
Good Job Blink and Justice.
Now I am more obsessed with this case more than ever. God, What’s Next???
#130 Kleat
“This might be a reach– but Cindy used the term ‘Zip’ drive for what seemed to me to be a reference to a ‘FLASH’ drive– a small capture device on a keychain. I don’t know if Zip is used interchangeably for ‘flash’ or not, re: small memory devices. (I thought a ‘zip drive’ was specific, but then I might be thinking for Mac, vs pc)”
No … zip drive is specifically something different than a Flash drive or rather “Jump drive” which is what people used to call it when they 1st came out years ago. A zip drive is somewhat archaic nowadays and not really in too much use anymore since CD’s have become so cheap and used more or less … zip’s have basically gone by the way of floppy drives and floppy disks … kind of gone in the tech world. We used to use Zip drives (for which Zip disks were used in them, holding more than a floppy disk would) where I used to work years ago before CD’s kind of took over instead. Nowadays, I don’t even think you can find ZIP drives in retail stores anymore. Jump or flash drives (which are basically just little memory devices to transport data back and forth) however, are everywhere.
I’m still with ya Blink on the whole Baez/Anthony family situation. He’s not their attorney. He’s not being paid by them. And yet, he seems to include them in every aspect of this case (of their ADULT daughter), even going so far as to tell her to shut up in a deposition! Somebody please explain to me how that happens. Conway, her own attorney, didn’t tell her to zip it. JB did!
Did you also notice how Cindy got Andrea’s ear right after the hearing. You could see her lips moving (as they usually do), with Andrea seeming to placate her in some way. They all seem to be playing to Cindy. Why? Are they afraid of what she’ll say if they don’t??
Granmomma: Please I reported on Dave’s site that you and I had a truths. Please come to that site nobody will judge you – most of the time. Please I am usually there early am 8 est. Sorry if I offended you.
aww, how can you not Gran?
B
162-Marcy
“61, WestSide: Are you saying that a good friend would have ignored the $700-plus in check thefts? Imagining myself as a near-broke young woman striking out on my own, I don’t think I could be so forgiving. The thief would have to have a damn good reason.
I also wonder if Amy did not press charges at the encouragement of LE.”
I was trying to be in “Lee’s head” (scary, I know). My guess would be that Amy might not have been as angry about the check theft initially, considering the shock of hearing about Caylee missing for 31 days. She might have had some sympathy. Whenever she learned what Casey had purchased (that didn’t involve “stealing to save her daughter”, as Casey put it), this probably sent Amy off the rails. (Thus she decided to prosecute for certain).
So maybe when she first met with Lee (Mr”ploy” investigator) she was softer about the check thefts. Lee was the one who said that Amy first told him that she was a good friend of Casey’s , but he called her “fake”, saying she wasn’t a good friend. He was about to mention the checks, but stopped himself. This is where my speculation comes in. When Casey stole checks from Lee, in the past, he told her never to do it again, but didn’t even attempt to get the money back, or file charges, etc. My assumptions, from his perspective, is that Amy should have done the same. It was not my personal opinion about Amy. I’ll try to find that page. But reading that transcript the first time made me insane.
Ginny — If I recall correctly, the tag on this shirt was similar to another one that was at the A’s. It was a brand that had been sold at Target. I believe the other shirt had words on it also. Something like “I get my good looks from my mom”??? And just recently I remember seeing yet another picture of Caylee in a shirt with a saying — didn’t Cindy say something in her depo about shirts with words. Golly, can’t remember. Off to check the document again.
Both Cindy and Casey shopped at Target, but then again, so did a lot of people.
I must be another dense reader, don’t understand the relevance of this disovery yet. So I’m gonna copy this page for reading purposes only & study the importance of the uncropped photo & how it ties in with Baez telling Cindy in the depo to ‘zip it’ while I’m walking my dogs.
I was Jaden’s Grandma’s MySpace friend at one time & she’s no Anthony supporter but seemed to be close with Richard Grund from my recollection. I deleted all of my ‘Caylee’ friends because of what I considered petty infighting & too much emphasis on religion which I don’t like discussing online, just my opinion. Myspace for me is an expression of my love of animals & their rights so we sort of went in different directions.
I love to read while walking, it’s sunny outside & I can get lost in this crazy case. I’m sure the importance of ‘the uncropped photo’ that may have been sold to the Globe by Casey or Baez will hit me like a ton of bricks but right now I just don’t get it. So off I go to read over the story & all your comments.
I have been away at AA (Anthonys Anonymous) but this is just too much to resist. I haven’t been through all the documents but I think the Anthonys all suffer from too much arrogance but not enough intelligence. If they were as smart as they believed, they wouldn’t be tripping over there lies every time they speak. They are all arrogant enough to think that they are convincing and that they can sway public opinion. Poor Caylee.
# 162Marcy
It’s page # 234. I don’t want to transcribe the entire page and I don’t know how to cut & paste from a PDF. I’m not sure if I could do that here.
I think it would be like an attachment.
#136 dddeerma
“These comments are growing so fast today.
Kleat: re: bruise under left eye in photo—it took some time but I found a reference to Ricardo Morales and a picture of Casey and Caylee on his sofa, which he said was taken on Jan 23, 2008, and he said in his statement that Caylee had fallen against a table. ”
I was looking at this pic earlier from The Caylee Daily (one of the sites Cindy was intent on going after last summer) and noticed something too. Don’t know if this is the same one you’re looking at or not, but this photo also seems to show Caylee having almost a blackened/purple eye. Look at the right eye as she’s laying down. Definitely something there, but from what I have no idea.
http://www.cayleedaily.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/0904caylee9.jpg
Annie, thanks for the invite. You didn’t offend me. You are too sweet. I wasn’t laughing at the majority of the commentors there but I come in to read when someone there was taking a very strong stance in supporting the Anthony’s and just thought some points in their argument was funny. BUT, Dave doesn’t know me either…..and I don’t think I called anyone a name on that site….NOT EVEN A FOOL. Even if I do come there for a laugh every now and then, I have never and would never be mean or ugly to anyone that I don’t know. I think life runs full circle and I always try to be as kind to anyone as I would like them to be to me.
Thanks Blink, I know you defended me earlier to Linda in NY. She said that she didn’t say anything bad, but it had to be worse than anything I’ve ever said to anyone on any blog………ATLEAST, I’ve never been called out for being mean anyways….LOL….and I’ve blogged here for about a year now.
Well, I never seen her comment if you let it through, but I would have probably ignored it anyways, I love the entertainment value of this story, and do think is funny how “all bent out of shape that people get” over alot of things that get said and done.
I just don’t roll like that! LOL……….
Thanks for a great site.
OK, I read the article and the posts…and I’m completely confused. What am I missing here with regards to this picture? I see that Caylee is wearing the t-shirt that was found w/her remains but I’m just not grasping why this pic is so important…please help…thanks!
#175 ginny
The shirt came from Target and was a size 3T … I remember when I first saw them at Target in my state (not FL) and thought for a second about buying them for my twin girls years back, but then thought better because the connotation behind the words just seemed kind of cruel to me for a small child, but that’s just me. I know a friend of mine however did purchase the shirts for her own twins and it’s the exact same shirt. Still wondering who actually purchased the shirt for Caylee if Cindy herself didn’t since she allegedly bought most (if not all of) the clothes. Anyone know yet?
#176 Marcy
I have an old high school friend who now lives down in Lakeland, FL (near Tampa) who’s in LE there and have recently mentioned this case to her and I asked her the same thing … what was her take on this and how did LE around her parts feel about it. According to her, they are all pretty disgusted by Casey Anthony and anything to do with her. They personally believe she is guilty (with everything they have seen over the years with mothers killing their children) and think it’s horrific. I don’t think there are too many people this case hasn’t touched to be honest with you. I know there are still some out there who don’t know much about this case, but it just amazes me.
#189_Stef_”I’m just not grasping why this pic is so important”
For what ever reason, it is an exhibit in the transcripts of depos(as a cropped version), and there were questions asked about it. The last thread has a lot of info on it, if you wish to read further.
Regarding Caylee’s Black eye. I think we shouldn’t make to much out of it until we know more. The reason I say that is my son when he was the same age was walking on the sofa and fell off and hit the coffee table and got quite the shiner. I have a picture I will share. This can happen.
KLEAT: I left you a post way up yonder. I am totally lost now about those gas cans. I am now under the impression she did not have them in her car trunk and never gave them back to GA like he said. What does this green truck theory have to do with it? I thought TL admitted to breaking into that shed for those cans.
Picture Blonde posted looks similiar of Caylee wearing this shirt and her mom with same hair style????
link please
B
Thanks for the picture justice 23. There were more than a few of Caylee with those black circles. It may have been allergies? Or the use of allergy medicine like benadryl. The ones with the left eye “mouse” don’t have a matching right eye. Or too many late nights following Casey? I was just hoping we could date the Globe photo by matching the eye mark. As Kleat has pointed out the bang style is different: in the sofa photo dated Jan 23, 2008, her bangs are long, but have been trimmed for the Globe. I think that would make the Glove photo date after Jan.
I am wondering too why the SA chose that photo to show to the As. It must have some meaning but I don’t know. Funny that Lee knew it was cropped. Also strange that the As claim Caylee didn’t wear shirts with words, or striped pants. I guess they could be “proving” someone else dressed her, but the clothes clearly belonged to Caylee.
G and C must have reasons for the scattered focus of their varied statements and depos but ???
I thought cindy had stated that she would not let her grandaughter wear a shirt that said that so to me that says she would not have bought it. So Maybe no one (the Anthonys) purposely recognized the photo because they wanted to be disassociated with that shirt? But the only reason you would want to be disassociated would be if there was something about the shirt that you knew to be bad. Like that was the shirt the kid was in when she was killed. Dont know, just a guess.
cindeefromwisconsin: me too. The gas cans and the green truck have been bothering me for two days now. My guess is that George is lying so that he can say that the car did not smell of decomp on June 24. Is there more to it than that? If Lee got the gas cans, does it change anything about the duct tape? I couldn’t understand why George would deny so strongly putting a hunk on the can. It meant something to George, but what? The tape is linked solidly back to the Anthonys.
cindee– I am not the one to ask on that at all– I was way behind on that issue. Others might help– forget who besides Blink…. sorry!
thanks, Justice23, that’s what I thought– I remember them because I needed one after I kept a computer too long and needed a way to transfer files! to a newer computer without a way to easily connect the two! Never got one.
Hello Marinade Dave, that was my comment and I apologize as I should have checked the comments first and I am so glad you posted here. I was happy (as per earlier thread posts) for you and the Judge Strickland request to say hello, and also, thank you for your videos of the woods and the neighbourhood, and other places of interest! (I did say this before a few articles back too )
I should have trusted my intuition much more this morning and apologize for the JW thing. No, you did not acknowledge that person behind you at all from what I could see.
When Blink gives someone her ‘nod’, it confirms and relays a certain credibility– you got the ‘Blink Nod’!!
Again, thanks for your valuable contribution via your videos– we all know what Kudzu is now too!!
This has been a crazy day in here– 200 hundred posts on a first day of an article, must be a record!
Keep up the great work– and I am sorry for any misunderstanding, it was a ‘today only thing, you can be sure!!’
O Kleat. Your Neat.
Tis all I got after this day!
B