Casey/Caylee Anthony Case: Caylee Pic in The “Big Trouble” T- SOLD TO THE GLOBE BEFORE Remains Found?
Disclaimer– exclusive original content copyright and property of Internet Network News, LLC and Blinkoncrime.com. Reproduction of this article , ANY OF IT’S CONTENTS, in whole or in part without proper attribution and source link is strictly prohibited without prior written permission.
BREAKING NEWS
Orlando, Fl– In the recent depositions by the State Attorneys Office in the case against Casey Anthony one common exhibit was noted in each deposition of George, Lee and Cindy Anthony.
A cropped version of a photo of Caylee wearing the tshirt that is believed recovered with her remains.
All 3 Anthony’s claimed to not have seen this picture before previously, although without being prompted, Lee noted the photo was cropped.
How then, did it get in the hands of The Globe? Could this be the evidence removed from the Anthony home that Jose Baez tells Cindy Anthony to “Zip It” during her testimony and objects to information he considered sealed by the judge?
This edition of the Globe was released October 8, 2008. Six days before Casey Anthony was indicted for murder and remanded to jail without bond.
THE SALE OF THIS PHOTO PRE-DATES THE RECOVERY OF CAYLEE MARIE ANTHONY FROM THE WOODS OFF SUBURBAN DRIVE.
One could make the leap that the person selling it would have had knowledge of what she was wearing when 34 month old Caylee Marie met her tragic end.
(EDITORS NOTE: Don’t even try the picture was sold at the yardsale with the clothes and laundry bag– PUHLEASE..)
Blinkoncrime.com poster “Justice 23” contributed to this report.
Related Posts
Related Posts:
1,441 Comments
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
I have no idea how this works, so I hope some of our legal eagles will chime in. Is the prosecution (in its arguments) allowed to say things like “She deliberately placed Caylee in this particular shirt before murdering her” —perhaps even embellishing it a bit more to say WHY that particular shirt—even though they are really just speculating about whether she gave one whit of thought to what the kid was wearing, and what it possibly COULD have meant in her own twisted mind? Or do they have to stick to the facts: “The shirt found with Caylee’s remains said ‘big trouble comes in small packages’”? Or would they be allowed to add “You can draw your own conclusions as to what that means,” etc.
My question is, how much rhetoric are they allowed vs straight, provable facts? I am sure they will want to horrify and shock and stir every emotion that will get the jury worked up against the accused, but since alot of this case has some pretty big gaps in terms of solid facts (died when, died where, died how, died why, to name a few) they’ll have to fill in those blanks as we do, with educated guesses and imagination.
And is it only in opening and closing arguments that they are allowed to weave the facts into a plausible tale that—while suggested by the facts, if one connects the dots in a certain way—might or might not be 100% true?
I know that the photo is significant because 1. Caylee is wearing the shirt that was found with her remains, 2. It was sold to the Globe before the remains were found, 3. The state included it as an exhibit in depositions.
I tend to have other thoughts or analysis after a bit of digestion. I am considering a different angle this morning. Isn’t it entirely possible that it was , as I said before, a karma coincidence that this particular image was sold? Someone other than the “A-team”, possibly Kio or Ricardo, could have sold this image not knowing the importance? Couldn’t the state have, (not knowing who sold it), thrown it out there
for shock value to illicit testimony that might open up dialogue about the ‘sealed issues’? They do know the propensity of the Anthonys to talk themselves silly in response to a question. It could have been a careful ‘phishing expedition’.
On the flip side, with Casey being tight lipped, and the consummate liar that she is, couldn’t the defense have sold the photo while being completely oblivious to the fact that the remains would be found with the shirt?
These are just some thoughts, and they are not intended to discount anyone else’s thoughts or opinions.
Of course it is possible, can’t deny it-
That said, my money is on purposefull choice of that photo by someone with knowledge. Either way, we will find out. There’s a zero percent chance the State won’t compell that information from the Globe. And they will get it under seal, which will be our first clue.
B
Ok, Sorry Blink, I went back and read lol posts. I misread.
You know it is rather frightening to miss read or miss hear something. Thank God for a multitude of opinions until you can get to the facts.
# 300_suz
“…“She deliberately placed Caylee in this particular shirt before murdering her”
My question is, how much rhetoric are they allowed vs straight, provable facts?”
I have wondered that myself. Maybe there is testimony somewhere that can corroborate this assertion. Other than that, I’m at a loss.
The only thing that comes to mind is that the shirt no longer fit Caylee, so that there would be no reason why or how she could have worn it, and that it was not actually on her, but tossed in with her as a symbolic gesture?
ok, Im going to go ahead and say this, I am changing my opinion on her “wearing” the shirt. I do agree like the shorts, it was not on her.
The collar was intact.
B
#283_Silver
Got that?????? They WARNED GEORGE–BEFORE they even took him to the car on the lot– that it has SMELLED SINCE IT HAD BEEN THERE AT JOHNSON’S– AND TOLD HIM IT SMELLED AT AMSCOT–WHEN THEY PICKED IT UP. (does that jive with what Cindy Anthony tells the media, the State?? Hell to the NO.)
Great points, all of them, and funny as hell! If you don’t want to answer, you don’t have to, but were you ever a prosecutor? If so, you must have been a pistol! Your closing arguments would be strong, and yet entertaining. You would certainly keep the jury awake and keyed in on the absurdities.
Oh my !!!! I do think I’ll have to polish the tarnish off my handle after this thread!!! LOL (sorry couldn’t resist)
How is everyone?? Had to jump in on this.
Silver!!!!!! I enjoy reading everyone’s thoughts, but ……I gotta admit …..really was waiting for your 2 cents on this one…………so now that the A’s credibility is ZERO….I suppose the prosecution just has to watch how they tread with the sympathy factor (and ssem to be doing well so far). Did you read how Lee blew out Cindy (and George) in his depo? The sticky note with ZG’s name and address among a gazzillion other contradictions???? Not to mention her claim of non knowledge / involvement of D. Casey’s search in the woods. Oh my!! The A’s input has all been wiped off the slate me thinks.
******************************************************************
But Silver…….what about the 3rd person partial DNA on the duct tape??????? Thankfully the FBI can’t exclude one of their own…..but bejezzus……the defense is going to run with that one ….no?? It’s the strongest thing they’ve got to date….at least IMHO. And it’s the only glitch so far I could see that might just get Casey off the hook (from my layman view of course). How damaging is that going to be do you think???? Inquiring riddling minds are dying to know!!! Thanks and best to all.
(Hope you are well Blink)
R
#299 Westside
You Said:
“I can only imagine what is going on in other blogs and forums, tearing apart their appearances, etc. I’m happy that it is not tolerated here”
I know I have read some of these peoples post. There are some really crazy and disturbed people out there. The kind that shoot first and ask questions later. They simply believe what they choose to believe and could care less about the facts. They dont even want to hear any facts or even try to get to the truth. Some posts are quite frightening. There is no use in talking to some of these people. You cannot reason with them.
#294 Casey’s top in the photograph is NOT the blue dress she wore to Fusion. The sleeves are much longer in the Globe photo. The Fusion photo is kind of a capped sleeve. Is it possible that this particular photo was one of the photos Casey deleted before July 15, 2008?
Thats what I think, personally. I dont believe it is the blue dress.
B
Is it correct? LE found “Big Trouble Comes Small” not “Big Trouble Come in Small Packages”
The reason once again that this site is soooooo great…..Investigative Blogging…not so much just shooting the sh&t. Smart people here. I was waiting on Silver to dig into the depos and send us a life preserver…..AND a chuckle! Thanks, see I laugh at some of the commentors here too! No harm done!
Blink are you Linda DB? You are always just as cool as a cucumber. That’s what I like soooo much about the prosecution in this case. My personality is more like Mr. Ashton. I’d like to tell the defense how stupid they all look, cursing after each breath. AND, Silver’s personality seems like my mom’s….bet she could tell you off in a BIG way in a NY minute and never say one ugly word. Now, those people really are VERY SCARCE.
Sittin back, observing and packing my BAT PHONE! Hoping not to be needing it today but you just never know.
nancy2410lmh:
“The clothes in that picture kinda looks like she’s wearing the infamous blue dress when she was partying at Fusion.”
nancy2410lmh good morning
Yes, yes, yes, You’re so right. Great going.
She was photographed on June 13 (and I think June 20 also) at the nightclub by Fusion photographers wearing that dress.
TL”s roommate Roy Clint H. said he saw both Casey and Caylee on June 13
at Fusion.
The boots she was wearing look similar to the boots Cindy found in the backseat of the car, as pictured at the end of her State deposition.
nancy2410lmh, kudos to you
#280 Sigh, yet again. Question: Why ALL of the COUNTLESS lies, ALL of the time, and from the very early beginning when George, in his testimony to OSO recounted that HE, upon getting into the vehicle at Amscot could not bear the smell and so HE got out of the car and asked the attendant to ASSIST HIM in opening the car’s trunk to see what it might contain (a dead body), but according to — what was his name? Birch? Burch? Regardless, in Birch’s statements to OSO Birch said that the odor was so disturbing that HE (Birch) asked George for the keys and HE, Birch, opened the trunk, found the bag (which wasn’t so transparent by the way, and which hardly weighed anything but which did contain flies (I don’t recall if he also said there were maggots), and thereafter Birch proceeded to toss the bag over the fence. So the lies began at the onset. At the onset the Anthony’s suspected their grandchild was dead, and began conspiring prior to even leaving the Amscot parking lot.
As for who sold the picture of Caylee in “the shirt” to the Globe? Would it be so surprising to learn it was George and Cindy, if through a third party, in order to so immediately drum up funds for some sort of legal assistance. This, I believe fits the scenario. They knew Caylee was deceased, from the evidences they dealt with regarding the car. They had no money. We all know that. They sold this particular photo to the Globe hoping that the little pink shirt would not be traced back to the house, or to them, because “Caylee had no shirts with such lettering on them.” And, no one had ever seen such a shirt! It was the only one of its kind and so the chances of it being traced back to them were lessened. For all anyone knew, someone else could have given her that shirt. They never saw it. Though they well sold it. They never expected that Casey would have disposed of her daughter in that shirt. That’s my take on it, subject to change at any moment, of course.
G’day.
Gavi
This morning doesn’t start off any better with that incredible comment from Silver and Blink changing her mind.
Silver thanks for reducing some of the cobwebs that form in my brain and keeping it real. Your points really struck home for me.
ada and Blink, good morning
The blue dress in the Fusion pics has sleeves that are “gathered”
across the shoulder seam areas. The Globe cover has the sleeves ungathered. Coul dbe this dress is one of those with a “drawstring” casing sewn into the shoulder where the sleeve length can be adjusted.
JMO.
OOPS, sorry Silvrspnr, didn’t read your post before I posted. As I recall, Birch, or Burch, whichever, went into great detail about the smell of the car, likening it to a previous automobile that had been towed in and contained the rotting body of a man who’d committed suicide. He said that the stench of the Anthony vehicle was the same, though not as strong. That’s not surprising. The stench of a an adult’s decomposing body might be a good deal stronger than that of a child.
Most Respectfully,
Gavi.
That is definitely not the blue dress from fushion.
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_6eonppuEMEo/SNq62ssxoNI/AAAAAAAACOA/AlySYRotzwA/s400/caseyanthony3.jpg
Holy What the Wow.
#304 Blink – If it’s the case that the shirt arrived at the scene later like the shorts and the theory that the photo was deliberately selected and negotiated for Globe publication is true, it gives me chills. This would have had to have been contrived as early as August. It seems even more heinous to me now. Although Westside, I’m still not very clear that the shirt was too small. Marked 3T, and if none of the Anthony’s ever saw it as they claim, how do we know this to be true? I will say for some unknown reason, this cropped photo of Caylee has always bothered me and I never knew why. When I studied the cropped photo the other day, the main thing I found disturbing about it is that Caylee’s pupils appear to be extremely dilated. Very unusually so.
#283 Silver – Love your posts. And agree completely with your thoughts and analysis. I believe they knew on 7/15 this baby was gone. The actions of the family from that day forward have been deceptive. I don’t know anyone who, upon finding their 31-day missing daughter & granddaughter’s abandoned vehicle reeking of death with their belongings still in it, who would have driven the car home, cleaned it out while doing the laundry and then gone on to work as if it was any other day. Casey had virtually no cover for herself and it was when Lee began playing Inch-High Private Eye with his pad and pencil that the story seems to have hastily come together. There is nothing about any of this that has any credibility – starting with Casey’s statement that she dropped off her baby between 9Am and 1 PM that day. A four hour time frame? Stop there and go no further. Any mother can tell you what time she dropped her children off, and I would think that on the most significant day of your life – the last day you saw you precious baby – the details of that day would be forever emblazoned in your being. Right down to the minutiae.
Anyway, I am similarly buried in the early LE/FBI interviews and it’s just mind-boggling when compared to their depo’s.
allow me to clarify- I think the shirt was not “on” Caylee, but dumped with her remains.
Shorts were not on Caylee, and potentially dumped later
B
Ok….I had to go take a lookie at the cruise pics.
1. I’d say that is an earring in George’s ear
2. I think they both have tatoos.
SNARK ALERT….
Does anyone remember what it meant in the 80′s for a man to have his RIGHT ear pierced?
AND, where’s all their friends and supporters? When friends of mine have taken a cruise….you don’t normally have that many EMPTY chairs around you at the pool deck. Were they on that cruise by themselves? LOL
No problem Blink-and by the way-Very interesting post and comments re: the picture. But where can I find a full photo, enlarged without the Globe cover? Is there one?
In my mind – the dress from the Fusion pic had totally different sleeves and neckline vs the one in the Globe pic. The shades of blue look similar but that’s impossible to know given the nightclub lighting vs what seems to be either dusk or evening outdoor light and all of the variable camera conditions, etc.
I have not seen any other pics of Casey with that shirt on. It seems to offer a bit more ‘coverage’ than what we usually see her in – especially in the summer. Is that possibly a clue to the date of the pic? I know her hairstyle is VERY similar to the timeframe of June-July. She did give some good points of reference in a timeline just from her hairstyles alone.
I can’t really tell about Caylee’s hair/bangs. Depending upon humidity her hair could look very different from one day to the next since she did have quite a bit of natural curl. That could make the bangs look shorter or longer.
To me, it looks as if Casey is kind of ‘half sitting’ on something. Not a low chair but something higher. And depending on how you photoshop the pic – what seems like a bruise in some cases – looks more like a little curl of hair in others. I go back and forth on that one.
#262
THANK YOU! I wanted to comment on the ‘obvious’ myself. But why a cruise when they yet to be used Caylee Marie has been docked. What gets me is that their grand daughter is dead, their daughter is in jail and they’re living the high life on the seas? Please tell me their scam is going to bite them in their behinds. This so called foundation has YET to service their community in any capacity. Again…missing children in Florida and cruising? And where did OrlandoEAST post her infamous hot air rants….from the lido deck? I’m sure she’s Isaac’s best customer.
GRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR!
Thanks, Blink, for clarification.
Sorry…I forgot to identify a snark alert. I’m snarkin on every level after seeing those photos.
#317 muse
“Although Westside, I’m still not very clear that the shirt was too small. Marked 3T, and if none of the Anthony’s ever saw it as they claim, how do we know this to be true?”
It was a hypothesis based on the assertion by the state that “it was intentionally” placed with/on Caylee; I didn’t state it as fact, but other than corroborating testimony (which remains to be seen), my analysis of what MIGHT have lead them to this conclusion. (Some posters have placed the time of this photo at January 2008, some later. If January, she could have grown out of the shirt)
“ok, Im going to go ahead and say this, I am changing my opinion on her “wearing” the shirt. I do agree like the shorts, it was not on her.
The collar was intact.
B”
I know several people have already pointed this out, but this really does give new meaning to Casey’s complaining that “They haven’t even found her clothes yet”. Chilling.
I juxtaposed a Fusion photo of casey and the Globe photo to compare her hairdo. This hairdo, coloring looks very much the same. Maybe the hair in the Fusion photo is a bit longer. Here is link to the Fusion photo I found. If I get time I will see if I can send a link with both together. Fusion photo of course was June 21, 2008
Sorry, here is link to photo
http://media.myfoxorlando.com/photogalleries/072908caseypics/1/lg/4.htm
Question for you guys – does it look like Cindy has on the same shirt in the photo #143 on the first link as the one Casey has on in the Globe cover in the 2nd link?
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/local/crime/orl-caylee-anthonypics-photos,0,5614814.photogallery
http://coverawards.com/2008/10/08/news_globe_magazine_caylee_mom_47182/
Looks the same to me but it is a pretty generic T-shirt.
Adding to my last post: Again, a THEORY, if these shirts are still widely available, the LE could have purchased the same shirt in size 3T, and then compared it to the latest known clothing of Caylee’s, (before she went missing), to determine if that shirt would indeed still fit. Sizes are numbers. Different manufacturers vary the fit.
This may have nothing to do with he statement of “intentionally” putting it on Caylee. For all I know, it could have been a bit of hyperbole tossed out, designed to get the public enraged, with no real evidence to back it.
(your quote) “none of the Anthony’s ever saw it as they claim”
As the course of this investigation goes on, I personally believe less of the Anthony’s claims.
I believe more of the earlier statements , rather than the later ones.
************************************************************************
#317 muse
“Although Westside, I’m still not very clear that the shirt was too small. Marked 3T, and if none of the Anthony’s ever saw it as they claim, how do we know this to be true?”
It was my hypothesis based on the assertion by the state that “it was intentionally” placed with Caylee; I didn’t state it as fact, but other than corroborating testimony (which remains to be seen), my analysis of what MIGHT have lead them to this conclusion.
I am just now getting to the Cindy Anthony Depo, I am where she is talking about the night she called the police, again she is claiming that she only told the 911 dispatcher about the smell in the car to get the police there faster and that she only said “it smells like there’s been a dead body in the damn car” but really it was only garbage and it “smelled”, then she goes on about giving here statements to police, I have never seen her actual police statement from that first night, has that been released? I would be interested in what her first initial report states when all this was so frightening and upsetting to her before she had time to devise her lies (and George for that matter) I have heard all the interviews but would be very interested in seeing the statements from the first responders and CA & GA on that fateful night.
if that has indeed been released would one of you kind folks point me in the right directions, I am hunting right now..
thanks!
IF Casey sold this photo it would have been back when she was saying……. THE NANNY took her. Maybe she was going to say this is a picture the NANNY took of us w/Caylee wearing the shirt SHE gave her? Casey again THINKING she a criminal genius, HENSE the planting of the shirt to send a message!
SuzeeB and Lily
I agree the sleeves are different. It’s just that particular “blue dress” had a red hue to it, and the Globe cover appears to be heavy on the red side, which is why the garment looks more “purple” and Caylee’s pink t-shirt is more a more vibrant shade. I don’t recall any photos with CA wearing that color top, not to say that there aren’t any. Of course, who’s to say the Globe didn’t alter the colour of the top altogether.
In this link, the top of the shoulder looks to have a double stitched seam or some sort of casing on it. Thoughts?
http://coverawards.com/2008/10/08/news_globe_magazine_caylee_mom_47182/
Lily, totally agree on the “bruise”. Wanted to post last night, but I wasn’t seeing a bruise or any other injury under Caylee’s eye. Looking at the cropped version, IMO, there are wisps of hair coming across there. If you squint your eyes while looking at the under-eye in the cropped photo, it will look like the “bruise” from the Globe cover. The bruise” spot, or spots, were amplified with “heavy red” from the printing press.
Maybe the shirt was a gift from the Grunds or Ricardo?
Blink: “There’s a zero percent chance the State won’t compell that information from the Globe. And they will get it under seal, which will be our first clue.”
Is it possible this exact information is already under seal and was the item of reference in the Cindy depo?
Not previous to this article, no.
B
When, if ever, will the day come when the Anthony’s are forced to answer to all of their contradictions?
It seems as if they are just allowed to keep making these contradictory statements and no one seems to be pointing out that fact.
Does that come later, at trial? And will they be called to testify or plead the 5th?
Sorry for the rookie questions.
Can someone PLEASE help me out here before I go NUTS. I have been following this case since day 1 and pretty much have understood everything that is going on UNTIL NOW. There are a handful of things that I am just not getting. PLEASE HELP.
1. What is the significance of George and him placing or not placing duct tape on the gas cans. Over the hole or whatever?
2. What is the significance of Lee, his truck and the gas cans?
3. Are we completely ruling out that Lee had anything to do with helping Casey in any way after the fact?
Any guidance that anyone can give me would be MOST appreciated.
If the shorts were made of a blend of synthetic materials that would explain the reason they are in better shape then the shirt which was made of cotton.
Synthetic materials disintegrate at a much slower rate. The label on the shorts state they were made in Vietnam but not the fabric they were made of, or at least from what I could see.
I would also surmise that with the discovery of the lettering at the dump site of little Caylee, a rag magazine such as the Globe would have been all over that like white on rice. Do you think that the authorities have already confiscated all of their files and have that as evidence for the state hence a stop publication order.
#309 SuzeeB, no, LE found all of the words “Big Trouble Comes in Small Packages.” It’s in the footnote of page 3378 http://www.wftv.com/_blank/18740699/detail.html (and elsewhere).
In Cindy’s depo on page 136, Cindy says Caylee talked about Zanny’s dog. She is pretty determined to say this. She is asked if Caylee actually said “Zanny’s Dog” or did she respond to Cindy’s question.
Remember George’s depo? He said Caylee would say thngs (only after being prompted).
On this page as well as page 137 Cindy finally admits that Caylee never used the word Zanny or Zanny’s dog.
On pagae 221, I like how Cindy clarifies it was “Tony” that broke into the shed (then on page 223 says Caysee “barrowed” the cans.) Is that a oxymoron???!!?
After hearing the barrowed comment, LDB went on to still call Casey the “culprit”. That probably burned Cindy.
Pages 263 thru 265, Cindy is inundated with quick questions about Caysee’s lies. Cindy admits to each of these that Caysee did not tell her the truth, she lied. But,beware…..she says she still trusts her. Whatever!
I know I said this before….but, it bothers me. On page 222 Cindy says Caysee “admitted” to take the gas cans to Cindy over the phone “before” Caysee had contact with her dad on the 24th.
Really???
Then why does Caysee “fake a surprise!” with George that the shed was broken into and the Cans stolen…..when Caysee just prior to that comment cleared it was Mom that she barrowed them. She already told on herself………soooo why fake a surprise…..
Someone is lieing!!!
On page 345 Cindy said it hadn’t rained in forever. And didn’t George say it was raining the day they picked it up.
Page 383,4 Cindy says Casey beelines past her car in the garage (her car has all the doors open, sun roof open…and of course the smell) and heads straight to her bedroom. cindy is asked, “Doesn’t Casey ASK what are you doing to my car, what is going ON!!! Cindy calmly says no. (She didn’t ask, becasue she knew and had to think fast.)
Others have broght this out, but I just read it today….. Page 385 Line 17 Cindy says…. “Becasue at that point I still did not connect the smell to Caylee.” Tell tale……
387 Cindy says she never called George after getting Caysee home. Whereas George says they spoke and she wanted him to come home, but he said he couldn’t leave early. That maybe a little parphrased…anyway guess phone records would verify who is lieing.
And I have to admit, now that Blink shared with us that she feels the shirt was “tossed” in with the body………..that makessssssssss sooooo much sense about a Globe picture and the possibilty of framing someone eles.
Blink, when I look at these pics, the shorts and shirt look really tattered and messed up, every bit as much or moreso than the laundry bag, so it seems reasonable that they have been there all along, but do you see something different? http://www.docstoc.com/docs/document-preview.aspx?doc_id=12906766
Or are you building this theory of the shirt and shorts being dumped later because of the Globe photo, and who sold what and why?
To me, except for the possible night terrors and crying over the Father’s Day video, Casey didn’t give one thought to poor Caylee’s remains in the woods, so wouldn’t bother to go back for any reason. But you probably aren’t suggesting that Casey placed those items, but instead that someone on her team either did, either for framing purposes or because for some reason folks would think it meant the body was dumped while she was in custody? But why wouldn’t they just MOVE the remains? Too risky?
I really want to answer that, but can’t.
B
Well, firstly, I’d like to agree with WestSide’s comments regarding the Anthony’s in #299. It will never matter WHAT they do or WHAT they say (and yes I agree that most of the time I cringe when watching or listening to them), people will judge them. I mean really …. how many of us could have our photo snapped w/o our knowledge in a bathing suit and look great????? Come on now.
As for the whole Marinade Dave thing I have read here and on his site and I have this to say. I think for some (and only some), they may have a problem with him not because he is an Anthony lover but because he is not a hater. I’ve read tons of blogs regarding this case right from the very beginning and if you don’t hate the anthony’s then you will come under much speculation as either being one of them or being a member of KidFinder’s etc. Ridiculous. For the most part, people get off on the constant slamming of them. I am just not one of them. The junvenile name calling, inspecting their every move in photos …. hell at one point, some deranged woman even went through their garbage? I mean, seriously???
Personally, I’d rather be seen trying to return from a cruise and trying to mind my own business than snooping through someone’s garbage on national t.v. …. even if it belongs to the most hated family in america.
Sorry for the rant …. back to lurking.
silverspur—lol on the defense diagram that was so funny but in a sad way SO TRUE—BAEZ DEFENSE TEAM.
ALSO, glad that Dave posted here and glad of Blink’s response. Dave is about as unbiased as you can get—just wants to report the truth. He may state his opinion but he also acknowledges that it is his opinion. Also, regardless of what anyone thinks of the Anthonys, I thought it was very kind of Dave to shake George’s hand and say he was sorry for the loss of his grandchild. I think George has a part of himself still that remembers the love he had for that child and she for him, even though he is caught up in the Casey spin. And I am not a fan of any of the Anthony family not standing up for Caylee but Dave helps me to remember that there is a difference between opinion, stating the facts and judging. God will eventually be the one to judge. Caylee knows how many of us care about all the defenseless children. Don’t want to go on and on and I am not a skilled person to ferret out what is going on in all the depos etc like a lot of people but just felt the need to comment. thanks for the time
Whoops, Blink, missed your clarification about the shirt and shorts. Still trying to figure out how it helps Casey to have the shorts dumped later. I haven’t heard LE or anyone suggest that they are so intact that it messes up their timeline. Were they supposed to be found earlier, when freshly dumped, perhaps back in the original Aug 11-13 Kronk timeframe?
Had to do catch up with all the posts….The way I see this is, the only one who would have known what Caylee was wearing was CASEY! The Enabler ANthonys claim they did not see her for a month. I assume, that if this is true, the Anthony’s could not have known what Caylee was wearing when last seen. Yeah know it all comes back to CASEY! It is very very odd that the picture was printed and BAM it so happens that Caylee’s remains actually had it on. It still all comes back to Casey. Blink, if this is now so important of a find…..Can the GLOBE be forced to tell where they got the picture? I am assuming no, due to 1st amendment rights. Its just so sad. One of the previous posters hit it on the head that is was most likely JOSE who sold it for money. And I am sure he knows all to well Casey is guilty as the day is long. How long is this joke of a trial going to be allowed to continue? Seems to me a losing battle for her so called defense. I can not see all these high priced lawyers, getting their own reputations damaged by this trial. I do not believe that is was ‘just a odd chance” that Caylee was found in the very same shirt. I do not understand how it is relevent now. This whole trial is off the charts, whats one more insane thing coming forward. You said it your self Blink. Casey can sell anything. I do fear that Caylee’s remains photos are gonna surface, one way or another. I do not trust any of these cast of clowns.
Re the answer to 301:
Blink ( or Silver…or anyone),
CAN the State compel the Globe to reveal who sold that photo?
I certainly nourish hope that they CAN, because it is so critical…
but …1st Amendment, protecting sources, etc….
Or would the Globe voluntarily cooperate…?
I asked this way above, but got no reply….( too much important information happening!)
Please…if anyone knows….
BLINK – Gosh I miss seeing all of the comments when you go off and do silly things like tend to your real life. (Sarcasm intended)
Sorry, lol classroom visitation day
B
http://viewer.zoho.com/docs/izbFg
Not sure if I could leave this link but it is the article from the Globe. It has 2 very cute pictures of Caylee.
“allow me to clarify- I think the shirt was not “on” Caylee, but dumped with her remains.
Shorts were not on Caylee, and potentially dumped later
B”
Blink could the shorts being dumped later been the idea of a certain attorney? What would be the purpose? Were they maybe in the car and someone tossed them later? how do you think that all went down?
if you can clarify…….thanks!
Think yardsale comments from Cindy depo.
B
sorry one more thing, wouldit have been in an attempt to set someone else up?