Caylee/Casey Anthony Case: New Discovery Released
Orlando, FL– The State Attorney’s Office is set to release 1000 additional pages of discovery this morning of previously unseen evidence in the case against Casey Anthony for the murder of her daughter, Caylee Marie.
Sources within the SA’s office speaking on the condition of anonymity to blinkoncrime.com say the new information is largely FBI reports.
The release comes on the heels of new motions filed by the defense this week.
Jose Baez and Andrea Lyon, defense counsel for Casey Anthony filed a motion alleging double jeopardy violation in the upcoming fraud case, a reply to the states motion to preclude death procedures and yet another motion to dismiss. A hearing date has not yet been set by Judge Strickland’s office.
blinkoncrime.com will be posting the latest round of discovery as soon as it becomes available. Please check back for updates.
First Set of Documents DNA Evidence FBI Emails Test on Knife found in Car
Link to All Individual PDF Menu
Related Posts
Related Posts:
1,460 Comments
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
PS. They better not even jaywalk for the rest of their lives. It took time but where is OJ and his defense team now?
Attention Everyone: Today is the last day to vote for Marinade Dave in the Orlando Sentinel Orbbies. Please take a minute and Vote. Dave needs our help.
Comment by ada — November 20, 2009 @ 12:41 pm
I wholeheartedly agree with you ada.
Roy Kronk’s ex wife who gave testimony against hi. Another credible witness for the defense.
Defendant Information
Defendant Name: KRONK, JILL RENEE
Race: WHITE, CAUCASIAN, ASIATIC INDIAN, ARAB
Sex: FHeight:Weight:DOB:03/09/1957
Address: 3038 CHAMPIONS DRIVE
City: MARYVILLEState:TNZip Code:37801 – 0000
——————————————————————————–
Charge and Disposition Information
(Each Charge is listed separately. The disposition is listed below the Charge)
Charge No: 001Description:FORGERY-PRIV DOCUMENTS
Statute: 27.44.(a)Description:FORGERY-PRIV DOCUMENTS
Amended Date: CJIS Code:1 2502MO/PLL:Probable Cause:X
Incident Date From: To: Victim Age:
Disposition Plea: OTHER PLEA
Disposition: NOLLE PROSEQUIDisposition Date:08/06/1993
Fine:$0.00Court Costs:$0.00CICF:$0.00
Amt Suspended: Fine:$0.00Court Costs:$0.00CICF:$0.00
PBJ EndDate: Probation End Date:Restitution Amount:$0.00
Jail Term: Yrs:Mos:Days:
Suspended Term: Yrs:Mos:Days:
Credit Time Served:
——————————————————————————–
Charge No: 002Description:UTTERING FALSE DOCUMENT
Statute: 27.44.(b)Description:UTTERING FALSE DOCUMENT
Amended Date: CJIS Code:1 2513MO/PLL:Probable Cause:X
Incident Date From: To: Victim Age:
Disposition Plea: OTHER PLEA
Disposition: NOLLE PROSEQUIDisposition Date:08/06/1993
Fine:$0.00Court Costs:$0.00CICF:$0.00
Amt Suspended: Fine:$0.00Court Costs:$0.00CICF:$0.00
PBJ EndDate: Probation End Date:Restitution Amount:$0.00
Jail Term: Yrs:Mos:Days:
Suspended Term: Yrs:Mos:Days:
Credit Time Served:
——————————————————————————–
Charge No: 003Description:THEFT:$300 PLUS VALUE
Statute: 27.342Description:THEFT: $300 PLUS VALUE
Amended Date: CJIS Code:3 2400MO/PLL:Probable Cause:X
Incident Date From: To: Victim Age:
Disposition Plea: OTHER PLEA
Disposition: NOLLE PROSEQUIDisposition Date:08/06/1993
Fine:$0.00Court Costs:$0.00CICF:$0.00
Amt Suspended: Fine:$0.00Court Costs:$0.00CICF:$0.00
PBJ EndDate: Probation End Date:Restitution Amount:$0.00
Jail Term: Yrs:Mos:Days:
Suspended Term: Yrs:Mos:Days:
Credit Time Served:
——————————————————————————–
Charge No: 004Description:THEFT:LESS $300 VALUE
Statute: 27.342Description:THEFT:LESS $300 VALUE
Amended Date: CJIS Code:3 2399MO/PLL:Probable Cause:X
Incident Date From: To: Victim Age:
Disposition Plea: OTHER PLEA
Disposition: NOLLE PROSEQUIDisposition Date:08/06/1993
Fine:$0.00Court Costs:$0.00CICF:$0.00
Amt Suspended: Fine:$0.00Court Costs:$0.00CICF:$0.00
PBJ EndDate: Probation End Date:Restitution Amount:$0.00
Jail Term: Yrs:Mos:Days:
Suspended Term: Yrs:Mos:Days:
Credit Time Served:
——————————————————————————–
Name:
Connection:COMPLAINANT/POLICE OFFICER
Agency Code: MSPAgency Sub-Code:9057Officer ID:0578
——————————————————————————–
Event History Information
Event Date Comment
WARI 06/21/1993 930621;MSP 9057;1; ;
WARR 08/11/1993 930806
DISTRICT COURT OF MARYLAND
Go Back
Case Information
Court System: DISTRICT COURT FOR CHARLES COUNTY – CRIMINAL SYSTEM
Case Number: 00621968P4Tracking No:0000621968P4
Case Type: CRIMINAL
District Code: 04Location Code:02
Document Type: SUMMONSIssued Date:12/01/1993
Case Status: CLOSEDCase Disposition:TRIAL
——————————————————————————–
Defendant Information
Defendant Name: KRONK, JILL RENEE
Race: WHITE, CAUCASIAN, ASIATIC INDIAN, ARAB
Sex: FHeight:Weight:DOB:03/09/1957
Address: LKA: 3038 CHAMPIONS DRIVE
City: MARYVILLEState:TNZip Code:37801 – 0000
——————————————————————————–
Charge and Disposition Information
(Each Charge is listed separately. The disposition is listed below the Charge)
Charge No: 001Description:FORGERY-PRIV DOCUMENTS
Statute: 27.44.(a)Description:FORGERY-PRIV DOCUMENTS
Amended Date: CJIS Code:1 2502MO/PLL:Probable Cause:X
Incident Date From: To: Victim Age:
Disposition Plea: OTHER PLEA
Disposition: STETDisposition Date:02/23/1994
Fine:$0.00Court Costs:$0.00CICF:$0.00
Amt Suspended: Fine:$0.00Court Costs:$0.00CICF:$0.00
PBJ EndDate: Probation End Date:Restitution Amount:$0.00
Jail Term: Yrs:Mos:Days:
Suspended Term: Yrs:Mos:Days:
Credit Time Served:
——————————————————————————–
Charge No: 002Description:UTTERING FALSE DOCUMENT
Statute: 27.44.(b)Description:UTTERING FALSE DOCUMENT
Amended Date: CJIS Code:1 2513MO/PLL:Probable Cause:X
Incident Date From: To: Victim Age:
Disposition Plea: OTHER PLEA
Disposition: STETDisposition Date:02/23/1994
Fine:$0.00Court Costs:$0.00CICF:$0.00
Amt Suspended: Fine:$0.00Court Costs:$0.00CICF:$0.00
PBJ EndDate: Probation End Date:Restitution Amount:$0.00
Jail Term: Yrs:Mos:Days:
Suspended Term: Yrs:Mos:Days:
Credit Time Served:
——————————————————————————–
Charge No: 003Description:THEFT:$300 PLUS VALUE
Statute: 27.342Description:THEFT: $300 PLUS VALUE
Amended Date: CJIS Code:3 2400MO/PLL:Probable Cause:X
Incident Date From: To: Victim Age:
Disposition Plea: OTHER PLEA
Disposition: STETDisposition Date:02/23/1994
Fine:$0.00Court Costs:$0.00CICF:$0.00
Amt Suspended: Fine:$0.00Court Costs:$0.00CICF:$0.00
PBJ EndDate: Probation End Date:Restitution Amount:$0.00
Jail Term: Yrs:Mos:Days:
Suspended Term: Yrs:Mos:Days:
Credit Time Served:
——————————————————————————–
Related Person Information
(Each Person related to the case other than the Defendant is shown)
Name:VANDERHEYDEN, TFC
Connection:COMPLAINANT/POLICE OFFICER
Agency Code: MSPAgency Sub-Code:9057Officer ID:3356
——————————————————————————–
Name:COLLINS, LEONARD
Connection:ASSISTANT STATES ATTORNEY
Address: STATES ATTY OFFICE
PO BOX 3065
City: LA PLATAState:MDZip Code:20646 – 0000
——————————————————————————–
Name:MUDD, JOHN F
Connection:PRIVATE ATTORNEY FOR DEFENSE
Address: PO BOX 310
City: LA PLATAState:MDZip Code:20646
——————————————————————————–
WOw, so Kronk was kind of married to a Casey Anthony. Good digging ada.
The TODAY show, of this morning, had Lyon (non Woolworthian version, hair calmed down, no clips, leopard skin print blouse showing slightly– could that be from Linda’s closet?? ) and Baez talking about the case. They got out of Orlando last night to NYC it seems.
On the video clip of the Today ‘interview’, they showed video depositions of one of Kronk’s ex’s, who said, with text on the screen to emphasise, that the first thing she thought was, Kronk did it– murdered Caylee.
Where were those ‘depositions’ taken? Was Kronk’s lawyer there? Was the prosecution allowed to be there? (was it a REAL deposition or a defense interview– what were the ‘rules’ of the interview for forms of questions?)
The defense on Today Show, said just as much circumstantial evidence for Kronk as Casey being the killer.
http://www.wesh.com/news/21661209/detail.html (video link on this page)
How do they know that Dominic Casey did not locate the body in November, or even earlier, staging the ‘proof’ where they knew the body was? Dominic Casey may have been the one who was ‘alone with the body’ and he had a shovel, and a metal rod, and he went to that area with the direction from Jose Baez and was directed NOT to call 911 if he found the body. (this statement is not yet on the court or deposition record under oath, because he’s been able to skip out on his depo dates, delay successfully, lie under oath to Judge Rodriguez, but he did go to those woods to look for a dead Caylee, first with Hoover, second with Hoover to document the proof of no body, then he went back again without Hoover a third day that we happen to know of)
A ‘death bed’ statement by Kronk’s wife so implies Ms. Kenny-Baden, so that implies credibility, no reason to not tell the truth.
http://www.clickorlando.com/video/21674760/index.html
(Kenny-Baden was covering the networks too, ‘The Early Show’ was her spot with the ‘almost a death bed statement’ and this is proof that the police did not do their job).
I wonder who their going to throw under the bus next month?
OK Blinksters – I just had my meeting with OCSO deputy that worked the case.
1st confirmed bombshell, although this was much touted gossip, I didn’t believe it, but Casey and Baez were having sex in his office. She constantly had hickies, and when they went to arrest her there the arresting officers caught them in the act. They also saw them at other times in states of various undress, and another time Casey had her shirt on backwards. He said she even attempted to hold Baez’s hand under the desk in court and he reprimanded her. There is an ongoing bar complaint against Baez over this, he and Casey both denied it, but there are too many witnesses. The officer has heard Baez say he doesn’t care, Baez thinks he is going to get so rich over book deals and speaking engagements and being an atty commentator on shows like Nancy Grace, that he won’t need to practice law. I guess stumping your client hasn’t gotten thru to him that that is a jailable offense in Florida.
He also said that the Anthony’s have known since they retrieved the car, and Caylee was missing what their daughter had done, and the cover-up began. He said there is no doubt that Cindy is the one who made up the Jay Blanchard Park story.
He also said, he was one of the responding officer’s over George’s attempted suicide, which again I thought was more a “look at me the victim so distraught”. But that the suicide note will come into trial and it will tell the real story.
He said what we all know the Kronk crap is just that, and will never hold water.
I could have talked to him for hours, and he didn’t seem to have any problems with talking about the case. But he was sleepy and had to go home to rest a little before his next shift.
I was teasing one of the girls here to date him for more juicy details. LOLLOLLOL
Anyway, again, he says this case is a lock for the prosecution, that they are being extremely smart in their processes, and evidence that will only come out at trail will smoke anything the defense can do.
How do we know what the investigators, FBI and other agencies included, did or did not investigate? We know there are suggestions that the FBI investigated Ricardo Morales, they would have investigated Ms. Amy Huizenga too, we don’t know if they investigated Richard Grund, his son, his wife, but we know that they must have.
The defense found a lot of choice to pin this suggestion of murder on, they chose the best one for their purposes– the most that can be dug up.
Blink, do you really think the defense could throw the Anthony’s under the bus now, without looking completely desperate?
Maybe this is how the defense is going to smoke the “EVIDENCE” from the state because everytime the defense does this the state comes back with more evidence….
good going ADA!!!! Soooo, the reliable defense witnesses have pasts too!! good comment too, Kleat, look at Dominic Casey while they are at it–oh he’s already on the Baez bus.
Blink,
Should we expect to see a lot more of the ex’s. Will the MSM now pay major licensing fees to these people. Isn’t it always about the$$$?
Oye Vey!!!
OK, since The Defense “team” and the Anthony’s can accuse/throw anyone under the bus, I have a new nominee for who killed Caylee: Mallory Parker. She had an extra key to the Anthony house. She killed Caylee before purposely getting herself pregnant by Lee. And knew Casey would get blamed. After all Casey and Caylee get ALL the attention.
Anyway…as Bill Scheaffer once said: The defense? They got nuthin.!
Looks like Kronk’s ex-wife wants to get her 15 minutes of fame before she dies of cancer.
Kleat, Is it possible that the ex’s were paid to say these things.
Also the EX, that states she thought Kronk did it. Where and Why
was she not calling LE almost a year ago now. How said to not
only be run over by the defense bus. But to have a EX, with
an axe to grind. You know Kleat I just answer my own qustions.
I can see these women on the front of the rags. That is how they
will get paid!
Kronk’s attorney did not come on board as a defense attny for a ‘suspect’.
The first thing I noticed yesterday, was the attorney’s multiple use of ‘NO’ when answering the media’s question of anything to be worried about. He answered something like ‘no… no, no… nothing… etc’ (several more negatives to support what one simple word would do). That shows a bit of transparency of ‘yes I’m worried’– no no no nothing, not at all…
That was as he entered the courtroom after going through security with Kronk.
Today, the news report showed this attorney doing the same thing– protesting too much… again repeating ‘no’ several times… like a whole sentence of them, including ‘zero’ near the end.
That does not do his client a whole lot of good and shows that this attorney hasn’t got such a good game plan for his client. I’m worried that Kronk may need someone with more confidence to the media and media handling savy, this case is all media on the defense’s side. They do cover the national media well– look at how Brad’s role in the past twice this has happened, has been to have his little presser first, then the real defense comes in with a big media whammy. It’s all about the jury pool poisoning and they are admitting this by saying the jury will be biased towards a guilty verdict just because it’s a dp jury and this is the fault of the State.
Blink, the good thumping should come sooner than later, along with a good media blitz on ‘who’ is doing the talking, who is on her deathbed and does this claim mean she’s credible?
Could be a ruse, ‘I’m sick’ being part of the attention getting process by this wife, prospects of payouts for her video– don’t you think she got paid for the airing of that ‘deposition’ (that some call this taped interview– WAS it even a ‘deposition’ which means RULES to be followed, where is the transcript as entered with the courts please!!!)
(are they even allowed to make a partial video or recording of a real deposition public, BEFORE it is entered with the courts? Is this making a fool of the potential jury pool public, who aren’t savy to the rules of depositions?)
(along the thread of someone making a serious medical claim to support their credibility to speak in a ‘depo’ on camera (and maybe for promise of future camera/pay media ops, there raises the question of how you would ever be able to prove this death bed, or sympathy cancer ploy (as a ploy or real)? Just as how would you prove Cindy’s statement, and George’s statement too, that the ambulance call that Jesse Grund made for Casey with her apparent seizure, that there was every test run at the hospital, and if there were drugs, that would have shown up.
This is an assumption of ‘parents’ but not of a child, of an ‘adult’, and what is that hospital’s policy to release records of any drug tests (if in fact any and all were done or did they just look for diseases– and ask the patient about drugs)?
What is the real basis for George and Cindy’s claim that Casey was ‘clean’ and this hospital stay proved it? This is an adult, if there were drugs in her system, or even that high powered caffeine drink, that would be between Casey and her doctors, not a little chit chat with parents about a child’s misuse of substances. They would have no way to get that information about Casey.
And we don’t know if the ‘cancer’ suggestion is a ploy or not either– it’s a sympathy getter. There better be some evidence of this, if she’s going to use the ‘death bed’ because of cancer, for her own credibility.
Ada – (hand clapping) Fabulous job!!!!
1109 Kleat
correct she has no reason to tell the truth. I sure wouldnt want to go meet my maker with that lie like in my heart!! that that I told here on earth.
This makes me sick sick sick how can they prove it if you recall the defense wanted proof in the past for anything the prosecution came out. now they have to prove it with what????
but kleat and other blinkers!!
Wont this make the defense look unstable I mean in the past they have throwed others under the bus with such passion!! like Jesse they were trying to make it look like he had motive than they moved on to Amy saying she was posing as the nanny! they did start out with the nanny than moved on to others. Its always been accusing others!! how can the jurry think anything they throw is is credible because they have made a pattern of accusing many!! I am praying that the prosecution has solid evidence and is confident in their belief that casey is the only one responsible. I still go back to the fact that she didnt report caylee missing and the cloroform searchs and the coffin maggots in the trunk along with other DNA !! how can the defense do this stupid stuff!! yet the prosecution sits quietly I do trully hope they have solid solid proof on casey. I think silence with the prosecution makes the denense nervous. You know baez is nothing without lyons help. He is on an ego trip to make a name for himself what does he know without mommy lion holding his hand. I am upset like everyone. but lets put our power in prayer that this will not come to pass and casey will pay for killing caylee .
prayer changes things lets not loose the faith!!! hard as it is to feel otherwise. Lets pray this one to the end.
chica
1113 cindeefromwisconsin
yes yes I believe the prosecution will prove them wrong everytime. I am in shock. they are a year late and on your dying bed to hate someone so much to want to do them harm and ruin their reputation. Your dying bed should be making peace with others before leaving this world. To leave this world with peace and a clean spirit that imo
I dont know if she hated kronk so bad that she would let this hate over take her !! pure evil IMO to leave this world with evil ntent is beyond unbelievable. I think this is just so sad and tragic and yet evil on her part. God is love, peace and long suffering etc etc. not evil , revengeful, full of hate and venom. maybe he needs Nejame to represent him. dunno if nejame is a defense atorney but kronk needs someone with real spunk. to bad johny cochran is gone he would of been a good one you know canidate.
Blink — I am confused. As I understand it, these videotapes of people from Kronk’s past are NOT depositions in themselves. These individuals have not been deposed, but just interviewed by the defense and then the interviews used within the motion to try to support the introduction of prior bad acts. And then, because the interviews are part of the motion filed with the court, they are immediately available to the press under the sunshine laws, whereas they would not be if they were actually part of a deposition. As far as I can ascertain, Kronk was not convicted of any of the acts these women claim may have happened. So how can the defense even present them as “prior bad acts” unless some type of proof, ie a conviction, exists?????
after the intial shock of all of this with running over Kronk with the bus and then driving back and forth across his body, what was said about the prosecution being REALLY
1098 wpgmousie
Your Welcome, glad I could help.
Bill Sheaffer’s reaction to the motion by the defense
http://www.wftv.com/video/21677312/index.html
We are going to need a bigger bus
LMAO. True Dat.
B
oops didnt finish—-about the prosecution being Really quiet makes sense though. They have a ton of irrefutible evidence on Casey so they are just letting the defense go from one “suspect” to another and back and forth and look stupid. Then they will go for the throat when the time comes. As most people say, 1. cant ignore the 31 days missing, 2. excuses to Cindy where Caylee was at, 3. decomp in Casey’s car etc. Until today I wanted her to just give it up and confess but now I would like to see her on trial and exposed for what she did but either way Caylee will get justice.
Check out this post (from hinkymeter) Hope it is okay Blink, you two seem cool.
It is a response from the lawyer Hornsby:
# shyloh
November 20th, 2009 – 12:42 PM
My question to him
Would love to hear your thoughts on the latest Roy Kronk being suspect.
__________________________________________________________
Attorney Hornsby responded to my or our question about Roy Kronk
hornsbylaw (2 hours ago)
And while it still does not answer who originally took Caylee, it does raise the significant possibility that Kronk may have planted the body. where it was found to obtain a financial benefit. And if he planted the body, one must question how he obtained the body, why he lied about how he located the body, and notwithstanding the significant evidence suggesting Casey was involved in Caylee’s death and disappearance – a jury would be left with the very real possibility that Roy Kronk was also involved in Caylee’s death. And unless the State explains that sufficiently, it leaves Reasonable Doubt.
hornsbylaw
hornsbylaw (2 hours ago)
This motion filed by Baez is the first legitimate and credible motion his team has filed. From a legal perspective, it correctly states the law regarding similar fact evidence. But more importantly, if he can produce the claimed evidence at trial, it likely be admitted against the State (except for the claims he showed unusual interest in little girls) to cast doubt on Kronk’s veracity, motive, and, thus, his credibility.
Absolutely WSH, valhall does nice work. I have not really weighed in on this issue yet as to the overall impact. I will.
B
Video Report: http://www.wftv.com/video/21677312/index.html
Basically, the motion wasn’t necessary, Kronk could have been questioned during the trial.
Motion was done in a very public way. . . .
Lawyer has qualified immunity, if he defames a person during trial that person cannot sue.
Any statements made outside of trial do not fall under that immunity
Mr. Baez may face Bar inquiry
First time post (to anything), recently discovered this site and truly appreciate the intellectual discourse and manners displayed.
Very brief observation to the professionalism or lack of to this latest motion generated by the defense.
Reference the motion here: http://www.wftv.com/pdf/21674732/detail.html
Item #9, partial sentence extraction of “the evidence points to Mr. Kronk just as stronly”…wth is ‘stronly’? Shouldn’t this be “strongly”?
How in the world can such a simplistic and basic expectation of spelling not be checked? This is a document being submitted to a court of law in a murder trial with national attention. I believe the state referred to one of their recent motions as a farce. The leadership and professionalism of the defense appears to be lacking ‘stronly’ in both of those areas.
Cheers y’all.
TD-
Welcome. That is actually lite in contrast to other motions. Yeesh as us Yankees say.
B
# Comment by Chica — November 20, 2009 @ 5:19 pm
Any statements made outside of trial do not fall under that immunity
Mr. Baez may face Bar inquiry
Well my dear Chica, we can only hope that Kronk or his lawyer watched that news cast!
WSH, to add an opposing view to the Baez motion, here is a raw video link to Bill Schaeffer’s discussion of the same– he doesn’t deal with the motion in quite the same way as Hornsby does:
http://www.wftv.com/video/21677312/index.html
Dispicable move, irrelevant…. and dangerous, could be in for a bar complaint if the lawyers are not careful, according to this defense lawyer’s position.
Why should Blase ( sorry broke my own rule un momento) care about a bar complaint? It is W I D E L Y known that the measure of his incompetence favors the prosecution in a big way.
B
Depo or not depo, that’s the question. The PI Mort Smith took those taped interviews, did he do it under oath? Did he do all that is required of a ‘deposition’ which would I suppose, be to enter with the courts as a transcript, properly transcribed, notarized, etc.
Is it just the press who are calling everything that looks like a video of a formal questioning of a witness, a ‘DEPOSITION”?
“Kronk’s attorney said the defense never asked Kronk specific questions about these allegations Thursday when they had him under oath and could’ve pinned him down while they had the advantage of surprise.
Sheaffer says it’s another indication that this is another media stunt without any evidentiary or legal substance.”
Now isn’t that strange???!! They did not want to catch Kronk unaware and possibly crunch him into a lie, or by not wanting to admit something? Not even one question?
Just media hype, the defense could be facing a back-firing squad.
The defense team is enraging me beyond belief with their tv gong show appearances. This is only about $$$$ to secure an income. They are running out of financial resources. Not only that, I cannot believe these morons have the audacity to continue conjuring up new ‘laughable’ theories and suspects AND expect us to take them at face value. Each time Baez opens his yap, he loses IQ points, I swear. Credibility has been shot to H E double hockey sticks for this team.
I still believe the right person is in jail. My instincts tell me and so does the evidence, imo.
so one attorney says it’s bad the other says it’s fantastic which is it?
LMAO! Nice work ADA! And the defense calls this witness credible? If this is a death bed confession, how convenient. Just how do they think they’d question her from the beyond during trail? EVP perhaps? Junk science isn’t so hokey when it suits your purpose
My guess is that the defense team got a paycheck this week. With JB and AL on Today and LKB on the Morning Show, of course we know those shows don’t pay for the interviews, but didn’t both shows run Kronk-related clips? If so, they got paid from both of those stations for the exclusive use of those videotapes. How convenient that they had some video to use for those interviews, huh?
OMG,JVM is starting now and saying that Jose will be on this special show and will answer all questions — no holds barred. Turn on your TVs!
I don’t think JB is saying that Kronk did it. I think they’re just saying that LE should have checked his background better because he did some bad stuff back in the day. They’re just trying to get someone to see reasonable doubt. I think there’s a big difference between them saying he committed murder and them saying he has a questionable background.
Wait– the wives, the daughter, the son will all be on the media rampage next!! && $$$$$$’s all around!!!
#1099 Joan
Mr. Scheaffer’s comments of the defense creating a suspect de jour fascinates me. It’s almost like peering into their subconscience and observing their real fears and uncertainties about their client. Their over the top media rants are nothing more than statements about their feelings and insecurities defending this case, imo. Shouldn’t they be focusing on the innocence of their client and avoid creating diversions with mythical theories and evidence? They say it was the nanny (the truth will reveal itself, remember?). They imply Jesse Grund is involved. Now Mr. Kronk is a suspect? DC was never associated with the defense. Which is it? Sex, Lies and Videotape. It’s all there. They never have anything more than ambiguous, questionable evidence. Casey has so many contributors, besides herself, nailing her coffin shut, I just don’t see any way she can avoid the DP now.
Dee, I have the exact same question. Just how much more of this mess are we supposed to take? We all know, including Dee’s cat, that Casey killed Caylee. All of this BS and $$$$ for what? To defend an obviously guilty murderer. Of course I do understand our rights and freedoms but haven’t we crossed some line into absurdity at some point? It feels like instead of upholding the law we are making a mockery of it. I almost feel like partaking in a good old fashioned stoning. And I’m a Canadian pacifist!!!!
Pamela, my jaw is on the floor. While I’m not surprised by most of it I am surprised that a cop revealed so much. Is that okay? I’m not clear on American law (although I do know a lot more than I used to).
Blink, in regards to the above video of Bill Scheafer and his comments on Baez and team’s recent motions…..if I understand him correctly, since Baez is not in a court of law in a trial while making these accusations, he is not granted the same immunity as that of if he were defaming a witness in a trial. So in your opinion, do you think Kronk will be pushed over the edge by Baez’s blatant disregard for human life, and bring a civil lawsuit against this empty suit?
I just read my comment and realized how lame it was. Who cares really how much we (I) have to take? Forgive me. Other people are losing their lives here. My inconvenience of waiting for trial is just silly in comparison.