Caylee/Casey Anthony Case: George Anthony Is Under The Microscope
George Anthony can stands all he can stands and he cain’t stands no More!
Yesterday, in an exclusive interview with Fox’s Holly Bristow, George Anthony read aloud a letter he wrote over Thanksgiving regarding his and his families plight of living “under the microscope.”
This is the same Holly Bristow that Cindy parked her SUV in rush hour traffic, ran to her news van, banged on the window and shaking her finger screamed to the driver that Holly would NOT be getting any more exclusives.
You can find Dr. Lillian Glass’s assessment of George’s appearance here.
Apparently George feels there is plenty of blame for his strife including bloggers looking for their 15 minutes of fame. Huh?
It would seem to me that in George, Lee and Cindy Anthony’s initial 15 minutes of LAME, they begged the media, the public and Law Enforcement to look for Caylee Marie Anthony THEIR WAY and without any scrutiny of the possibilities of how she got THAT WAY.
The Blinkoncrime contributing editors would like to remind Mr. Anthony that to our knowledge, the only thing that landed under a microscope in the search for his murdered granddaughter was her hair with a deathband at the proximal end; removed from his daughter’s trunk.
The rest of the scrutiny, sir, is of your OWN DOING.
You S O L I C I T E D help from OCSO.
You S O L I C I T E D help from the media.
You S O L I C I T E D help from the public.
You S O L I C I T E D help from the Padillas.
You S O L I C I T E D help from TES.
You S O L I C I T E D help from Private Investigators.
What utterly jams me about you people is your unmitigated gall that you think you can control events.
You have treated anyone in any capacity as if they should open their mouths, take the Anthony spoonful and ignore your hand in our wallets in the process.
You solicited public funds without a license to do so and misled thousands as to where your GRANDDOLLARS were going.
I would ask you how many granddollars your dignity cost you but as I have noted in an earlier “Microscope View” you were devoid of it before Caylee was murdered.
You have openly admitted to following witnesses in this case.
You directed Dominick Casey to spend the bulk of his time trying to dig up dirt on the very people your daughter duped for years; not to find Caylee mind you, but to take the heat off Casey.
How many decent people have YOUR efforts put under the microscope?
Mr. Anthony, I began work on Caylee’s case LONG before I had ever written about it because she was M I S S I N G. I put together a research team and we busted our humps daily to help find her, and to stop you and yours from using her as your personal ATM.
The fact is, these “bloggers” for the most part, all did more to find your granddaughter than you or any member of your family ever has.
When she was found and OCSO and the FBI spent 72 hours straight at the site to make sure they had all this baby’s bones what did you do?
You called the very people whose hands extracted almost every teensy bone of this cherub “effing flunkies” and ordered them out of your house.
What you, your family and cronies have never understood, is that THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH YOU. I don’t give a whip if you pierce your pinky toe. I don’t care about any of your proclivities whatsoever.
What I VERY MUCH care about, is justice for Caylee Marie Anthony.
My team and I will work as diligently as we always have to ensure she gets it and that her legacy is restored.
As long as you continue to publicly lie, omit, evade and demonstrate your overall inability to accept what has happened to your only grandchild at the hands of your daughter, you can expect a slot on my slide at every opportunity.
You knew on July 15. I could throw a rock from your roof to where Caylee laid in festering garbage. Shame on You.
You want out of the spotlight? Tell the truth. You might even try it before Dominick Casey cuts a deal and tells it for you.
Related Posts
Related Posts:
907 Comments
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
LOL subway I have a link also and it is page 22 on mine…
http://www.clickorlando.com/download/2009/0929/21146581.pdf
Interesting and the name Doreen at the end but email is a different name? oh well at least we know who wrote it… that was quick.
The only problem with all of this “information” is that they aren’t going to use what we have seen. We haven’t even seen the REAL evidence so these people are so……. well they are just soooo…… lol
Oh my, it’s Dominic Casey? He must be nuts!
How does this person that wrote the letter know that Jesse Grund was the last person to talk to Casey before Caylee went missing she/he states 2:35pm the time of the phone call?
Also, Question Is it true that all three women have shamrock tatoos?
I do not know about Nicole, might be the first I heard about that, but yes to Casey and Jenn.
B
#541 Kleat, I read A. Lyon is the one that picked the letter up.
01/15/2010 Transaction Assessment 5.00
01/15/2010 Counter Payment Receipt # CR-2010-03735 LYON, ANDREA D, Esquire (5.00)
01/15/2010 Transaction Assessment 5.00
01/15/2010 Counter Payment Receipt # CR-2010-03736 MEDIA (5.00)
Blink, D.B. Y/N?
Honestly, this is not worth anyone’s neurons firing up for.
It is a compilation of interjectors musings who are under some bogus impression that they can control events in this case in any capacity.
What everyone needs to be interested in, is what I have been saying for weeks.
The murder case against Casey changes entirely with a plea in the fraud trial. Word is those negotiations are going less than swimmingly for the defense. Outta time, and soon to be outta cash.
Son of Sam clock ticks on 1/25.
Baez Big Reveal 2/1.
B
Nope, not Cindy, not Baden either. But I do dare say that given Gil Todd/Black/Cabot or whatever he signed that particular piece of ‘marketing’ with, he has had someone do a bit of proof reading to make it legible enough for a judge. But the tone and theme are all Cabot.
Scientist?? Why not– FBI agent said he wouldn’t believe a thing the guy says, he’s an extortionist, convicted felon, and all-round low-life wanna be media magnate conspiracy theorist and anti-establishment and about anyone else who crosses him, publicist.
Hope someone has this guy’s passport locked away, but then he probably has a few tucked in his drawer for a variety of persona’s.
Blink, I didn’t catch your comment– hmm– not him? Who else is there with all that knowledge but DC. How could he dare write such a thing when he’s in the midst of a fight to stop all depositions? If that’s him, he just opened his own can of worms, didn’t he??
Cindy can not claim to be a ‘scientist’– not with her spelling of ‘chlorofil’ and looking up ‘chloro’ on Google for gosh sake!
Would Dr. Baden DARE to cross the Chinese Wall???
No. this is not from a member of the defense team in any capacity.
B
Sosad & Nancy
Did ya’ll read very far on that? OMG I read pages and pages, I feel like I’m reading a B movie script! Insane stuff.
One interesting thing I read was an email from Cindy to Sgt. Allen. She said ” I would like to correct you on one thing. Dominic Casey with D & A Investigations is not part of the defense team. They work directly for George and I for the sole purpose of finding Caylee Marie”.
She wrote that Dec. 8, 2008
I thought there was a big conflab about his testimony because he may have been working for Baez.??
Wowser, the person trying to team up with Cindy to implicate Jesse. Unfrikkinbelievable.
All this is probably old news to most of you but this was the first time I read any of this.
http://www.topix.com/forum/county/orange-fl/T4UHQV6DMIUFOA9C5/p4936 forgot to post link payment transaction
Ain’t Baden, it has to be Dominick Casey OR one of his associates and we haven’t yet seen ‘an associate’ besides Rosebud.
Could Dominick Casey have successfully avoided deposition in any form to date, or is this mitigation and the third wave.
IF this is Dominick, this is the same PI who had no idea what criteria are used to evaluate tips for investigation in a missing child case. He repeatedly could not explain how he evaluated which tips were priorities, which ones were legitimate, and even then, he just sort of investigated everything, not trying to do any ‘triage’ to make sure the most valuable tips might receive priority– he was, afterall, supposedly looking for a LIVE CAYLEE– time was important, wasting resources would be a critical failure.
The writer claims to be a ‘scientist’. Well, scientists have something called ‘scientific method’, a means of objectively evaluating information/data. DC didn’t have a clue about the term ‘criteria for evaluating tips’! Obviously he was confused and confuddled, even when LE attempted to slow down their speech and use smaller words, rephrase the same question over and over in an attempt to help DC understand what they were asking.
The guy is no more a scientist and researcher, than Barney Google.
But it’s notable that the writer, using fairly formal style, writes a cc: to George and Cindy Anthony. That is very familiar to put in an attempt at a ‘professional letter’ like this. Familiar because the writer ‘is familiar’ with George and Cindy, but a professional would still emphasize his or her credibility as a professional in this formal letter, and would undoubtably use the less familiar Mr. and Mrs. Anthony.
But then again, maybe personal closeness got the better of him.
(I didn’t check the ‘thesis’ citation– that would need critical evaluation by someone qualified, but I’d first ask if this thesis was defended, who wrote it, when, what field of study, where the student studied, has it been published in a peer review professional journal, if so, what’s the citation for that?)
WOW!! What this tells me, is the defense has absolutely nothing of any value. They are running scared and all they can do is throw out BS and hope something is believable.
in the Scott Peterson trial I believe Lacy’s family were allowed in after their testimony, is that due to special consideration to the family of the victim, will the A’s claim that as well?
please correct me if I am wrong…
So NancyS, how did you link the Doreen from the discovery docs to this concerned citizen letter? Do you know her?
Blink
You SURE called it. Between the write-up from an “attorney” and this letter, it seems that craziness will ensue. Although this letter appears to have been written in December. I posted a link on Hinkymeter to here.
I was waiting to see how NancyS had connected this concerned citizen letter to the person Doreen in the earlier discovery. I guess I am being a little dense. lol
On the question of who will be allowed to hear witness testimony at trial – what if the trial is televised live? We would all be able to hear it in real time – correct? Where does that leave the ‘keep ‘em in the dark’ strategy?
re: –
Comment by Sal — January 15, 2010 @ 2:48 pm
On the My Clerk site under the murder docket:
01/14/2010 Correspondence
RECD FROM JD
I wonder who JD is?
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Could this be a lawyer? Juris Doctorate
No, it means in ref to the Judge.
B
Hint:
De66y
W@!ker
What everyone needs to be interested in, is what I have been saying for weeks.
The murder case against Casey changes entirely with a plea in the fraud trial. Word is those negotiations are going less than swimmingly for the defense. Outta time, and soon to be outta cash.
Son of Sam clock ticks on 1/25.
Baez Big Reveal 2/1.
B
Of course, Blink!!!! That’s exactly what is worrying the defense…not so much Casey’s life, but they are about to lose their income source due to the impending convictions!!!! Brilliant!!!
Comment by Sal — January 15, 2010 @ 2:48 pm
On the My Clerk site under the murder docket:
01/14/2010 Correspondence
RECD FROM JD
I wonder who JD is?
————————
I was thinking it meant “RECEIVED FROM” …. “John or Jane Doe” (JD) because the author did not sign the letter …..
After reading the emails on the 100 page PDF – I have come to the conclusion that “Doreen” (99rose@optonline.net), is in a group/forum called Caylee’s Alive forum, along with a woman named Debra Walker (Gracie1656@msn.com) and a woman named Tonya Barton (tonyawrit2@gmail.com), who were/are doing a LOT of research trying to discredit Zenaida and to prove Casey is innocent. It really sounds like the same people who wrote the recent letter to the Judge. When you read the emails in the PDF, notice where these particular email addresses show up TOGETHER in an email to Dominic Casey, with copies to Cindy.
email from “Rose” (99rose@optonline.net) – signed by “Doreen” – TO CINDY
Doreen is in New York
a member of the “forum”
Deb Walker (Gracie1656@msn.com) working really hard to discredit Zenaida
Debra Walker
3811 Angus Drive
South Jordan, Utah 84095
801-282-5967 Home
801-597-6660 Cell
Tonya Barton
Elko NV
775-753-5784
tonyawrit2@gmail.com
pg 48 of 100 PDF
http://www.clickorlando.com/download/2009/0929/21146581.pdf
Dec. 6, 2008 email from Deb Walker (Gracie) to Dominic, cc Cindy
Hi Dominic,
My name is Debra Walker aka Gracie, and I’m part of the Caylee’s Alive forum.a long with Tonya Barton aka JIC. I wanted to send you some information that
we thought could be important. Attached you see a photo of a young girl on a motorcyle that may or may not be Caylee. We came across this picture on
a MySpace page.
Thinker, that is correct, but there is another member I am also familiar with “Katie”.
B
Blink
Do you mean that when Casey IS convicted that the Son of Sam laws will come into effect and the money train free for all can go kaput?
You need some thumbs up and down emoticons!
I wrote on it a while back, its not quite that simple, but in theory, yes.
B
Comment by Kleat — January 15, 2010 @ 10:11 pm
That absolutely makes sense Kleat!!
In my experience attending a murder trial… the father of the victim was the first witness on the stand. He gave background information about his son. He sat in the gallery for the entire trial. But he was the only one who was allowed to do that. Other witnesses were kept in a room near the courtroom and were called in when they were needed. They were then escorted out of the courtroom. I don’t think anyone else was allowed to sit in on the trial, probably because of the possibility of being recalled to give more testimony.
But you’re right about it being televised. Our case was 10 years ago — no cameras. I don’t think they have cameras in the courtrooms even as of today here in Chicago. But with this case, who’s to stop any of the witnesses from watching it daily, before and after their testimony? Wonder how or if they can somehow get around that. I don’t see how. How can you stop people from watching television in their own homes??
It’s inconceivable to see the extent George, Cindy, and the defense are willing to go for feable attempts at proclaiming Casey’s “innocence”. Recruit individuals to write bogus letters to judges, attorneys, anyone involved in this case. I think they are wasting their time, not to mention flirting with illegal activity. I think at this point, any scenarios that would seem off the wall in any other situation, would be utterly plausible in this one. I wonder how much the Anthonys paid/promised individuals for their unethical involvement. How much did they pay/promise Joy Wray to be a distraction, and potential “witness”, until she fulfilled their use, then they distanced themselves. Same with Mark Nejame. They used him until they had no use for him anymore, more to the fact that Nejame didn’t like the direction they were wanting to go. I wonder how much they paid/promised the transient that claimed Casey spent the entire week with him, therefor Casey couldn’t have committed the crime. The same with this new revelation/letter.
I read the letter late last night,so I can’t say I comprended very much of what he/she was saying.
!beside the fact that is oppisite of anything we believe, is there any truth to gloria gonzales, daisy rodreguez, juliette lewis?
Where do people come up with the idea that it was not caylee that was found?
Didn’t the fbi confirm that it was caylee? Or am assuming that we have seen the results?
I believe the letter is referring to a thesis written by a student for her master’s degree (MA) at LSU some years ago. Thesis was titled “Estimating the Postmortem Interval in Forensic Cases Through the Analysis of Postmortem Deterioration of Human Head Hair. The focus was to determine if the human hair deteriorated at a uniform or varied rate. It was based on a small sample of only nine cadavers all over the age of 50 years. Other differences did not appear controlled to then apply to the opinion that the child might have been deceased either longer or shorter of a time interval (IMO).
Well, if the defense try to use anything in this letter to prove Casey’s innocence, they will fail dismally.
Casey said Jeff Hopkins full name was Jeffery Michael Hopkins, not Jefferson……
There are so many disprovable facts contained in this letter. I am unwilling to spend any more time on debunking it.. Besides, Blink as debunked a great deal of these “mistruths” already, in previous articles. Thanks Blink.
Not too much longer to wait for the fraud trial…..
Now, did Ms. Whatsernamepublicitymedia person, do any investigations? The one that helped Dom Casey in the big reveal of the Florida Mall photos ‘sighting’?
Michelle Bart– that’s the one. Does she have a science background?
“omment by Sally — January 16, 2010 @ 11:43 am
What everyone needs to be interested in, is what I have been saying for weeks. The murder case against Casey changes entirely with a plea in the fraud trial. Word is those negotiations are going less than swimmingly for the defense. Outta time, and soon to be outta cash.
Son of Sam clock ticks on 1/25. Baez Big Reveal 2/1. B
Of course, Blink!!!! That’s exactly what is worrying the defense…not so much Casey’s life, but they are about to lose their income source due to the impending convictions!!!! Brilliant!!!”
Sally,
That’s not true, we hashed this out a while ago. Son of Sam laws apply only to the specific crime. If Casey pleads guilty to fraud charges, or is found guilty of fraud charges, by son of sam law, she can’t write a book about how she st ole from Amy. It is specific to the conviction. Add to that, Baez or any other attorney may write books or sell images(the Anthonys) even if Casey is convicted of murder.
LOL WSH,
She was quoting me (shocker). That is true, but even the state filing to invoke the SOS, will freeze assets, I maintain this is a bigger financial shot to the jugular than we think.
B
Bart has a degree in communications (according to Huffington Post bio). Not qualified to write what the writer of the letter implied as a ‘scientist’ on forensic matters, nevermind autopsy of a child.
“It’s a Mystery to Me! Blog” had an article of the Bart radio show. A guest by the name of Shaeffer was the forensic expert because of a supposed degree(s) in criminal justice. The letter to JD was written by Bart but with the help of her ‘expert’ in forensic science (anthropology, chemistry, biochemistry, cleaningfluidistry etc).
http://itsamysterytome.wordpress.com/2009/07/16/michelle-bart-dissects-caylee-anthonys-autopsy-report-on-her-new-radio-show-voices-for-justice/
QUOTE
“The Caylee Anthony autopsy report was the focus of the first show on July 15–the anniversary of the last time anyone say her alive. Michelle had an “expert” forensic’s scientist, (or so she led us to believe), Shelly Shaeffer, to answer questions.
Ms. Bart teased the audience by saying she herself had many concerns–some she hadn’t shared with anyone, and insinuated that she was gonna ask those tough questions. Whatever.
The purpose of the entire interview was, IMO, to put doubt in the listener’s mind….right down to saying that the body couldn’t be identified as Caylee’s–it couldn’t even be identified as a female. (That nasty little rumor has been skulking around the edges of the internet for a while now.)
Callers were allowed. Ummmm–she shouldn’t have done that. Fatal mistake. It went downhill from the first person that phoned in.
Right out of the gate, the first questioner called Shaeffer on her “exact” qualifications. Turn’s out she is not a doctor– not a medical doctor– not any kind of doctor. She has a bachelor’s and master’s degree in criminal justice. IMO, that means she wasn’t qualified to talk about the autopsy report with any real authority. She of course, did anyway. Guess they couldn’t find a real forensic scientist willing to have a “conversation” with Michelle Bart and support her spin.
UNQUOTE
Letter written by Bart and her help statement was a question. Looks possible, Caylee being deceased when she worked hard to get live Caylee sightings out to the public, might just have been too much for her own personal belief system. IE: she was duped and won’t face it, unless of course, she was in on it all along, more than the average Anthony supporter. Sending a letter to the court seems to be a no-no, taking the justice system into her own hands by asking ‘favours’ of a judge in the same manner as she accuses judges of ‘giving favours’ in the letter.
Quoting a thesis… really… expecting the judge to do the research, critically evaluate sources and science? It’s not his job!
Simon Barrett of Blog radio seems to say it all in his July 16th, 2009 review of the Bart July 15th, 2009 anniversary radio show. The ‘LETTER TO THE JD’ seems to want to raise the issue to a more sympathetic ear, but at the same time, smacks of the Cindy technique of veiled threats– ie: suggestions that judges can be manipulated and bought, along with other state officials and law enforcement (and presumably every scientist and technical expert at the Body Pharm and other labs).
“Caylee Anthony– Radio Show Implodes!”
Posted on July 16th, 2009
by Simon Barrett in Society and Culture, crime
posted ‘the day after’ the airing– Simon says ‘I am now even more baffled than before.” Read the original at:
http://www.bloggernews.net/121586
Quoting Simon Barrett:
“Michelle Bart has a long history of being in the Anthony camp, she was the original spokesperson for the Anthony family when Caylee was first reported missing. Last nights adventure, which was on the one year anniversary of Caylee Anthony’s disappearance being reported to law enforcement (some 30 days after the actual disappearance) was billed as an opportunity to discuss the autopsy report and the case in general:
(Barrett quotes the show’s promo: “On our first upcoming show, we will explore the Caylee Anthony autopsy report with a forensic expert and discuss the case that became public knowledge a year ago on July 15, 2008 in Orlando, Florida.”)
Barrett Quote continues:
“What possible motive could there be? Why would Michelle Bart, a long time supporter of the Anthony family want to air such a program? These questions kept going around in my mind, I knew there had to be an angle, but what could it be?
As the Germans would say ‘allez ganz klar’, all becomes clear. This was a 45 minute excursion into discrediting the validity of the autopsy report. Michelle Bart had professor Shelley Schaefer, a forensics expert as her guest.
It was an entertaining excursion into the ridiculous. Maybe the most outstanding piece of idiocy was bringing into question the identity of the skeleton. Professor Schaefer even questioned the sex of the skeleton! One has to wonder about the credibility of this expert.
I am not sure that Michelle Bart was quite expecting the questions that callers had. Right out of the starting blocks a caller grilled the good professor on her credentials to even talk about the subject. It went downhill from there.
Unable to resist, I called in with the all important question of why mother Casey Anthony waited 30 days to report that her daughter was missing. Needless to say, Michelle jumped in and explained that that was not the focus of the program, yet the program description specifically states ‘…and discuss the case..’.
A little later the subject of duct tape came up. Once again the good professor had some unlikely words of wisdom. In her esteemed opinion the duct tape was applied after the child died. That stretches my imagination to the limits. Why would you put duct tape on a dead body?
Michelle Bart is either the most ill informed person on the planet or an imbecile. One caller brought up the subject of the famed Anthony Bat Boat donated by the Kidfinders organization. Bart pretended that she did not know George and Cindy had a boat!
Being an interviewer, and the host of numerous call in radio shows I found the entire program to be an absolute farce. The subject was supposed to be the autopsy report, yet it was clear that Bart had not actually read it. Preferring instead to rely of second hand comments gleaned from CNN.
Clearly this entire program was an exercise in public relations that got badly derailed. Rather than achieving the goal of bringing doubt and uncertainty to the autopsy report, both Bart and Schaefer came across as buffoons. In fact it was not just derailed, it was a full scale train wreck. Rather than achieve the mission of casting doubt and uncertainty, something akin to a Marx Brothers movie unfolded.
If you have a strong constitution and enjoy watching people commit hari kari on air you can listen to the recording here.
Simon Barrett
Let Others Know About This Post”
UNQUOTE
(I was going to edit down, but since Barrett wants to share this information and since the letter to the judge may need to be put into more perspective as to the possible source of these serious accusations, ‘Caylee is still alive and in Puerto Rico’, judge’s can be bought, yada yada, I’m quoting the entire article with it’s link. I hope this is ok– as the author seems to want people to read his review of the Bart show)
that letter was a joke I got about 1/2 wat through the first page and had to click it off, I had no time for it, someone please direct me to some kind of evidence that I can grasp on to that proves innocent in this case…..opps sorry there isn’t any!
opps way!
Hello Blink and all. This is my first time posting, although I read here all the time and really enjoy everyones opinions and theories. I believe the latest letter to the judge is none other than the aspiring PI Lee. JMO, now back to lurking
TY and welcome.
B
In an incredibly “witchy” mood here but I do believe there is an institution or two of higher “learning” that needs to “recall” an awarded degree or more to this “scientist/researcher” fraught with personal invocations and disregard for factual data! Hurumph, peer review analysis, my left glutaeus!
On the other manus, laughter is a endorphin producer and this was free!
Brilliant. Not witchy enough, imo..
B
Is the ‘Professor Shelly Schaeffer’ really Shelly Schaeffer Hinck, listed ‘Internship Coordinator’ for the Department of Communication and Dramatic Arts, Central Michigan University?
If so, what’s her expertise in forensic science (lacking that, where’s the link to this expertise)? Theater and forensics specialist who can call into question, Dr. G and team’s identity of the baby Caylee Anthony?
Could so-called ‘professor’ Schaeffer, aka Shelly Schaeffer, aka Shelly Schaeffer Hinck, aka Shelly Hinck
(http://www.cda.cmich.edu/staff/shelly_hinck.htm) be the guest forensics expert on Bart’s blog fiasco?
Someone tell me this is not one and the same person!! (talk about something ‘Hincky’!)
Why the double barrelled name when Bart had only Shelly Schaeffer, forensic specialist, listed?
Take a look at this:
http://www.cda.cmich.edu/facultystaff.htm
Seems Shelly and Ed could be related? They both use the name Hinck, but on her own page, Shelly uses both in her bio, but only Hinck in her email.
Looks like Ed Hinck, is the Professor, Director of Forensics, Dept of Communications and Dramatic Arts, and has shared publications and presentations with ‘Shelly Hinck’.
http://www.cda.cmich.edu/staff/ed_hinck.htm
Edward A. Hinck
Professor, Director of Forensics
B.S. University of Utah
M.A. Wichita State University
Ph.D. University of Kansas
Address: 319 Moore Hall
Phone: (989) 774-3763
Email: hinck1e@cmich.edu
Office Hours: Mondays and Wednesdays 2:3:30p
Concentrated Area of Study:
Dr. Hinck’s interests lie in the study of political debate and forensic pedagogy. Currently, Dr. Hinck is in the process of working on a book project with his colleagues William O. Dailey and Shelly Hinck on how face saving and face threatening strategies shape audience’s perceptions of candidates in presidential and vice presidential debate. As the Director of the Forensics Program at CMU he enjoys coaching undergraduates in speech activities sponsored by the National Forensic Association and mentoring graduate assistants who serve as Assistant Coaches in our program.
Memberships
National Communication Association of America
American Forensic Association
Central States Communication Association
National Forensic Association
Selected Publication and Presentations:
Politeness and the Study of Presidential Debates, Invited Guest Lecture with Shelly Hinck, University of Kansas, April 9, 2004.
Politeness in the 2000 and 2004 Presidential Debates, Argumentation & Advocacy, Co-authored with William O. Dailey and Shelly Hinck, forthcoming.
Building an Endowment, National Forensic Journal, 23,116-125.”
————————————-
So, it might follow that the ‘thesis’ cited in the ‘Letter to Judge Strickland’ is perhaps one of the students of Professor Edward A. Hinck (or not, but would be interesting to know if this thesis work was guided at all by Professor Hinck or his collegues and if it was ever subject to peer review if published in any of the forensics associations listed above.
(Valhall?? do you know about the student’s thesis citation?)
WHO wrote the letter from ‘concerned citizen’? Bart is not a forensic specialist, Shelly Hinck/Shelly Hinck-Schaeffer/Shelly Schaeffer, as ‘internship coordinator’ is clearly not at this time, a ‘professor’ (quite a demotion– unless it’s nice to work with hubby as compromise?)
Was the author of the letter Shelly or Edward, or a compilation of both? Whatever, someone had access to Dominick Casey’s work in the case, or independent work that paralleled the PI for the Anthony’s?
Would ‘Ed’ stick his neck out to write to a Judge in Florida?
Direct link to the thesis: (searchable)
http://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-01242005-145140/unrestricted/Collier_thesis.pdf
Leaving a review of the work to the experts.
(Could a (for now) anonymous student of criminology or forensics be the author of the ‘Letter to Judge Strickland’? The case could be the topic for an student research paper, maybe that’s why the author could cite ‘researcher’ and ‘scientist’ citing so much primary research into the ‘missing Caylee’ aspects. Whoever wrote the letter has followed the case and has opinions that support the Anthony defense position, as well, a less than objective viewpoint on the case with a single Anthony ‘devil’s advocate’ bias.
Trivia question– what’s Bart, with her degree in communications, relationship to the Dept of Communication and Theatre?
haha great line joypath
“On the other manus, laughter is a endorphin producer and this was free!”
Sure would like to ask Cindy & George, if these arent Caylee`s bones, then how on earth did her blanket and clothes get in the same bag as the bones. Oh forgot perhaps there is aliens or jealous ex boyfriends who run around and do that kinda stuff
that letter made my tiny little gastic bypass stomach do 1/4 flip flops hahahahha to much info huh…. but come on now really…after all this time we really need this “reaching, mis-direction and story telling” I don’t have time for this give me something I can analize and understand and is truthful…my GOSH don’t these idiots read the papers…31 days people 31 days…”smells like there’s been a dead body in the damn car”…”we found a human skull” (to note a 1/4 mile from the A’s in Casey’s youthful playground)…excuse everything else, what else do these people need????? I know how bout a pic of ZG on the stripper polll during the 31 days that might do it…
quit trying to pull a rabbit out your AZZ it stinks! Defense(less)
sorry Ms. B I am angry again…
Blink, am I the only one here that is truly just P’Oed, I can’t stand anymore analizing, I can’t even go there anymore a year ago I got it, today, after piece after piece of analization (is that a word??) and evidence isn’t it just black and white at this point, all the smoke and mirror “RAVE” parties are so old and played out, and who at this point in time even cares about these stupid letters that should have come out a year ago…they are IMO a day late and a dollar short and a sorry attempt to shift the focus and are just honestly BS techniques, they are just that, and the simplest of jurors can figure it out with blindfolds on….
eeeerrr I get so irratated when this crap happens and I hope the SA does too and I hope they totally hands this crap to the Defense on a silver platter…
I sit and shake my head and say Holy Shizza not again!
Ha Joypath-
you go girl!
# Comment by westsidehudson — January 16, 2010 @ 9:20 am
So NancyS, how did you link the Doreen from the discovery docs to this concerned citizen letter? Do you know her?
OH no WSH, I don’t know any of those kookies, I just saw the signature of Doreen at the bottom but no last name…
Comment by Kleat — January 16, 2010 @ 6:04 pm
Trivia question– what’s Bart, with her degree in communications, relationship to the Dept of Communication and Theatre?
Kleat I have the same type of degree and it is Audio/visual Communications and it can be categorized as communications for short…
BOLD FACE is stuck on but at least we can see everything more clear?
fixed, thanks
B
I hate to admit what a doofus I am. Post 582 thru posts 595 are showing up in bold-face type, the way Blink replies, and ONLY Blink. It never crossed my mind to look at the names at the start or end of a post, simply because I saw the bold print. I thought OMG Blink has finally gone over the edge, off the hook, bezerk. HA!! On top of that, I couldn’t figure out why in the world you were questioning AND answering yourself.
Geez, this case has made me nuts apparently. GAWWWDDDD. I turned around and told my husband that I think someone must have laced Blink’s drink or something. Then I realized it was just me being a doofus. Ugghhhh….!!!!!
Lol, Wendy, your no dufus. I left a string open, my bad. Fixed it.
Thanks
B
Family and letter writer seem unified on the ‘it’s not Caylee’s remains’ issue:
George Anthony responded to the question whether he accepted that the remains on Suburban are the remains of your granddaughter?
Answer: “No. I don’t. No. I don’t… ” (and he goes on to say that there have been too many releases or things that have been given out there (public record), and I still haven’t see that yet, and I’d sure like to see it.”
Mr. Ashton responds that ‘Well, you know, your attorney is more than welcome to ask us for whatever you would like to see. It’s all public record, as you know… Except for the photos.”
Pgs 330-331 George deposition by the state:
Cindy and Lee each had the same belief in the remains not being that of Caylee, each with their own reason.
Looks like this is a belief that they hope sticks in the minds of jurors, not even the baby, therefore no body, she isn’t dead. Rediculous yes, George had head in sand because he knew if he saw the evidence, he couldn’t as easily say he believes otherwise, and the attacks on the state for withholding or doing unethical things in railroading Casey, could be countered with hard well accepted scientific non-bogus, real science. If they haven’t seen it, they can blame the state for them not seeing it– seems George lost his voice and his ability to read and reason.
(