Caylee/Casey Anthony Case: George Anthony Is Under The Microscope
George Anthony can stands all he can stands and he cain’t stands no More!
Yesterday, in an exclusive interview with Fox’s Holly Bristow, George Anthony read aloud a letter he wrote over Thanksgiving regarding his and his families plight of living “under the microscope.”
This is the same Holly Bristow that Cindy parked her SUV in rush hour traffic, ran to her news van, banged on the window and shaking her finger screamed to the driver that Holly would NOT be getting any more exclusives.
You can find Dr. Lillian Glass’s assessment of George’s appearance here.
Apparently George feels there is plenty of blame for his strife including bloggers looking for their 15 minutes of fame. Huh?
It would seem to me that in George, Lee and Cindy Anthony’s initial 15 minutes of LAME, they begged the media, the public and Law Enforcement to look for Caylee Marie Anthony THEIR WAY and without any scrutiny of the possibilities of how she got THAT WAY.
The Blinkoncrime contributing editors would like to remind Mr. Anthony that to our knowledge, the only thing that landed under a microscope in the search for his murdered granddaughter was her hair with a deathband at the proximal end; removed from his daughter’s trunk.
The rest of the scrutiny, sir, is of your OWN DOING.
You S O L I C I T E D help from OCSO.
You S O L I C I T E D help from the media.
You S O L I C I T E D help from the public.
You S O L I C I T E D help from the Padillas.
You S O L I C I T E D help from TES.
You S O L I C I T E D help from Private Investigators.
What utterly jams me about you people is your unmitigated gall that you think you can control events.
You have treated anyone in any capacity as if they should open their mouths, take the Anthony spoonful and ignore your hand in our wallets in the process.
You solicited public funds without a license to do so and misled thousands as to where your GRANDDOLLARS were going.
I would ask you how many granddollars your dignity cost you but as I have noted in an earlier “Microscope View” you were devoid of it before Caylee was murdered.
You have openly admitted to following witnesses in this case.
You directed Dominick Casey to spend the bulk of his time trying to dig up dirt on the very people your daughter duped for years; not to find Caylee mind you, but to take the heat off Casey.
How many decent people have YOUR efforts put under the microscope?
Mr. Anthony, I began work on Caylee’s case LONG before I had ever written about it because she was M I S S I N G. I put together a research team and we busted our humps daily to help find her, and to stop you and yours from using her as your personal ATM.
The fact is, these “bloggers” for the most part, all did more to find your granddaughter than you or any member of your family ever has.
When she was found and OCSO and the FBI spent 72 hours straight at the site to make sure they had all this baby’s bones what did you do?
You called the very people whose hands extracted almost every teensy bone of this cherub “effing flunkies” and ordered them out of your house.
What you, your family and cronies have never understood, is that THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH YOU. I don’t give a whip if you pierce your pinky toe. I don’t care about any of your proclivities whatsoever.
What I VERY MUCH care about, is justice for Caylee Marie Anthony.
My team and I will work as diligently as we always have to ensure she gets it and that her legacy is restored.
As long as you continue to publicly lie, omit, evade and demonstrate your overall inability to accept what has happened to your only grandchild at the hands of your daughter, you can expect a slot on my slide at every opportunity.
You knew on July 15. I could throw a rock from your roof to where Caylee laid in festering garbage. Shame on You.
You want out of the spotlight? Tell the truth. You might even try it before Dominick Casey cuts a deal and tells it for you.
Related Posts
Related Posts:
907 Comments
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
(later will take a stab at a layperson’s review of the student thesis, not from a forensic scientist’s point of view, but as someone using the common sense factors, things anyone needs to question)
Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense.
Buddha
Wise.
B
The Ant’s lack of character and humility never ceases to amaze me…don’t even get me started on their ignorance.
Sorry Blink, I take and I take and I just can’t takes no more
“Cindy and Lee each had the same belief in the remains not being that of Caylee, each with their own reason.”
please tell me how in the HE!! these people held a memorial then? that is the dumbest thing we have heard since the comment about the nanny did it.
I tell you I am fed up with the A’s I have had about all I can take.
If George and Cindy don’t accept that the remains were that of Caylee, then they themselves need to be brought up on murder charges due to their cremating an unknown body
So if the inmate’s parents and brother are saying that the bones/remains found with items from their home are not those of precious toddler baby girl, Caylee Marie Anthony, are they saying that Dr. G. lied or that Dr. G. fabricated that story? Dr. G. is a well known very reputable professional. And if they didn’t believe that the remains were not those of Caylee Marie Anthony, why did they accept the remains and cremated them? And what then was the purpose of having a second “autopsy” by the defense?
Also, if Juliette Lewis was the inmate’s friend to the point that the inmate confided in her, why hasn’t Juliette shown up (like Annie has) to verify the inmate’s story? It’s been longer than 1.5 years. Same for the Jeff Hopkins (the “other” one, Zaky’s father), wasn’t he “dating” or “engaged” to the inmate where he gave her a tiffany ring? There are NO pictures of any of these folks in the “family albums” and these are suppose to be people known over a span of a few years. Surely there would be at least a handful of photos in the laptop(s)/desktop(s). These 2 folks (and ZFG) if they existed, as related to the inmate, would not having anything to lose if they stepped up to verify the inmate’s story. They haven’t because they DO NOT EXIST.
I sure don’t understand what the conduits/muppets of these “letters”, pictures, and sightings are getting out of fabricating such nonsense. It can’t be a Christian duty because they know it’s a LIE. I wonder if these people go around with their heads covered with “hats” made of aluminum foil?
I have seen a lot of immorality, lack of ethics, lack of integrity, corruption, cheating, thievery, and lying at different moments in my life but I have never seen such a cesspool of putridity from a bunch of “humans” all lumped together at once. PATHETIC!
God, Lord Jesus Christ give these people what they deserve!
JUSTICE FOR CAYLEE MARIE ANTHONY!
RIP CAYLEE MARIE ANTHONY!
http://s439.photobucket.com/albums/qq120/cayleecross/?start=480
page 25 and page 26
Casey jail funds January 6, 2010 to Sept 27, 2009
Casey Commissary Orders October 7, 2009 to December 30, 2009
Blink don’t you think this week ahead will be interesting? any ideas as to which day the bottom falls out? i can’t wait for it. will the defense wait/decide something(deal) thurs.1/21? you stated the SOS issue 1/25,i think it IS crunch time this could be like 4th of july with all the fireworks? will dom casey ever have to spill HIS beans – gosh i sure hope so – he has a daughter right?, maybe a grandchild too, what would he do if this happened to him? attn Dom: just PLEASE tell what you know and save yourself, if it’s still possible! also yes dee i get very P’Oed too, i think we all do in our own way
LOL Dee it sounds like you need to take a break… I have to do that now and then… you are displaying the symptoms…hehehe RELAX!
What leads me to believe this is “someone” out of the Anthony camp is the use of the word “compelling”
“One of the most compelling pieces of evidence in this case is invalid involving the single hair claimed to belong to a deceased Caylee Anthony.”
If you have ever listened to any of Cindy Anthony’s interviews with investigators or the FBI, she uses this word repeatedly…
Quick look at the investigation in Hughes-Collier’s thesis reveals that the investigation used samples from an adult population with an age range from mid-fifties to the seventies. Can the results be extrapolated to assume the same for infants and young children whose hair is much finer?
To conclude that a black death band would be in quote ‘NO WAY’ possible in a timeframe of 30 days, the writer of the ‘concerned citizen’ letter does not take into account the differences in hair structure, dimensions and other characteristics from these older adult test subject samples. There is no follow up study to determine if the findings are similar for babies hair.
Common sense test says there may be differences and that death band characteristics differ in time since death, in a very young child from older adults used in this thesis investigation. A finer baby’s hair may be more vulnerable to attack from any agents that cause progression of the black band and the rate of progression to ‘black’ may occur significantly faster. And possibly faster yet, in a small child who is left in the conditions of triple plastic bagging in a hot Florida car trunk for some days.
Remember there was a ‘shadow’ of a shape on the car trunk floor, and that the shadow was caused by mould in a pattern where there was more moisture/pressure from the child’s body. So we know it was hot and humid in the trunk before the body was moved to another hot and humid environment, perhaps not as hot as a sealed metal trunk but still a hot, moist environment. These conditions were not replicated in this study and do not conclude anything about small children’s hair and death band observations vs time since death.
Kleat- I wanted to take a second to tell you how impressive your grasp of this case is. I have seen you instantly educate yourself in some areas based on almost nothing more than a thought.
Thanks for your contributions.
B
I hope Valhall can contribute a real argument to the statements in the letter, as far as the forensics goes. The writer probably has little experience in forensic science to use only one study based on the wrong population of subjects for a small child, to come to his or her conclusions.
dee, it’s just their own created little belief system, they have accepted that they will believe themselves and seems they are doing that, keeping themselves isolated from being exposed to anything of the outside. Almost a little closed society within themselves. Maybe it’s self-presevation because if they do read and listen openly to common sense, look at the reports, accept what is undisputable, they won’t hold it together for Casey.
In my amateur opinion regarding George and Cindy, there are some who seem to want to condone and overlook George and Cindy’s actions, or lack thereof, citing the ‘victim’ status for what has been bestowed upon them unexpectedly. I could understand their rational and behavior in the very initial stages of this case, but it has been way past time to finally come around and do the right and moral thing by cooperating with law enforcement into everything they know, and everything being truthful. Fine, lovingly stand behind their daughter, just because she is, but as for doing the right thing, there should be no compromise into what I have learned to be true, and that is two wrongs do not make a right
Dee (595), you’re not alone. These lamebrained liars are really working on my second to last nerve too.
Also, two of the case subjects died of heart attack. Possibly these people had been on some, maybe several, medications, certainly the three cancer victims, the female who died of breast cancer, the two males who died of lung cancer, would have different chemical make-ups in their hair. What do cancer drugs do to hair also– suppress fungal attack post mortem? Three subjects had an unknown cause of death, but as adults, may have been exposed to drugs, environmental conditions, that a baby, with an immature immune system, has not had the time to be exposed to yet.
AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH! I need to take a deep breath, and wait patiently for next week. I cannot wait! Shoul be interesting to say the least. Peace Justice for Caylee Marie Great posts. I am all numb. Need my bed now. Thanks Blink! and all here.
http://www.streetdirectory.com/travel_guide/author/details/Deb+Bromley/
Fits the exact Profile
http://www.clickorlando.com/download/2009/0929/21146581.pdf
See page 8 as an example. The above name is listed in emails
Yes, your correct. The Katie I was referring to is the next email down. What these yutz’s don’t know is that OCSO had everyone of their IP addresses in July/August 2008.
B
I know its probably a stupid question but can they check for prints/ink/DNA on the letter to see if it matches any known A?
If George and Cindy (self proclaimed children’s rights advocates) do not believe the remains found on 12/11/08 were Caylee’s – why aren’t they demanding help from authorities to find who this poor dead baby really is?
They are just rotten to the core.
Kleat
Your posts were interesting and enlightening. Thank you for that.
Not ANOTHER foundation! Katie’s got one too, makes it look legitimate in its name as a gifting foundation to leave your legacy– write them into your will, idea. But it’s not that, on the surface. They do take cash donations of course. http://www.angelfire.com/folk/legacyfoundation/wishlist.htm
Ok, Blink, what general category is the ‘concerned citizen’? Someone publicly known connected to the case?
Debra Bromley. One of the “Caylee is alivers” that introduced themselves to the A’s, and apparently had frequent contact with them and Dom Casey. You know, I find it astounding that once her remains were found, these people still function in this bubble.
B
Blink, Kleat, and all:
It’s possible that Hinck’s degree and credentials in “forensics” is actually referring to the public speaking/public debate definition of forensics, not the scientific crime-type of forensics. The term “forensics” is used in both ways. I have a Professor in college right now who jokes that she is President of the NFL – the National Forensics League – which is actually a student organization centered around public debate, not science whatsoever. It appears with both Hinck’s, their expertise is in communications, not science.
Thanks, Blink. That’s a wrap! With the much anticipated Valhall response–
http://www.thehinkymeter.com/?p=1427
It’s all in the reading and objective interpretation and Val helps us with that beautifully.
CarrieK, yes. Strange though, if this Shelly Shaeffer Hinck is the one and same specialist on the ‘blog radio show’ as Michelle Bart’s guest.
Blink, could the Caylee is alive-ers continue to perpetuate their stuff without the full co-operation (or direction) from Cindy, George and Lee who all stated in sworn deposition, their belief in this position?
Would someone write that letter without an indication of approval from the Anthony’s?
Blink/Kleat
Who are all these “defenders” and what is their link? Has any one person set them on this course? Are they sincere in their beliefs? Do they feel that they will personally benefit in some way? I can understand a person giving the benefit of doubt about Casey’s innocence, but these theories like “Caylee is still alive” are bizarre to say the least. They are promoting something that isn’t plausible vs keeping an open mind. So what’s in it for them, or are they tied (even remotely) to the Anthonys or a friend there-of, or the defense, etc? Do they just want attention? I don’t get it, do you? What’s the daisy chain here?
WSH-
You know, this may be a first, but my answer to your question, is I do not have a clue.
Truly.
B
611, thanks Blink. I’m off base so often, and missed/didn’t follow up the posts that linked to the ‘alivers’. I just never paid attention to any of that when read the discovery of the emails so long ago (it seems). Having gone back for a quick review, it’s nauseating, really!
I have never seen you off base Kleat, not once.
B
Now comes the question: HOW the heck does any of this convoluted “hypothesis” (ps: that’s a scientific term!)of this letter have ANYTHING to do with logic? The author didn’t even COMPREHEND the entire graduate thesis, the blatent, dogmatic statement of PMI is statistically discussed within the student’s findings! And do not let me get into the variables regarding the population studied vs the case at hand, oh NO!…And then we have this author scientist/researcher making blatent statements with 100% conditionality (YEAH, FIND ME A REAL researcher who’ll do THAT!).
ONE QUESTION: why? get? involved? in? a? stranger’s? legal? NIGHTMARE? that? COULD? become? YOURS? WHY????????
Brilliant Question, Joypath.
Very simpleton answere I am afraid: Because they were I N V I T E D.
For some, that’s enough. Sad.
B
#622 Isn’t Debra Bromley also Debby Walker?
Possibly, I agree. I did not go any further than that, it really did not matter to me.
Honestly, I think this virus has run it’s course to immunity for me.
B
Comment by Kleat — January 17, 2010 @ 12:24 am
“dee, it’s just their own created little belief system”
I must admit that you are right…
Nancy, I do take a lot of them I know it doesn’t seem like it from my rants, believe me if Blink would allow me to rip an old fashion AZZ Chew I would, I have an uncanny way of doing so, not one of my best traits
I try to be as good as I can be, sometimes my hubby has to
pull me away from this computer…
Caylee was a baby, and she has no one to stand for and that enrages me, and the lies and cover up are plain and simply “EVIL”
Is the reward for Caylee’s safe return still being offered? Who put up that money? Was it an offer only or was money actually deposited somewhere?
The reason I ask is if these kooks are so adamant that Caylee is alive – why aren’t they searching for her? I mean REALLY searching for her.
Yes, your correct. The Katie I was referring to is the next email down. What these yutz’s don’t know is that OCSO had everyone of their IP addresses in July/August 2008.
B
Blink, I’m sorry I had brought this up again. It was bothering me, so I just had to. These are a s*** bunch and I have seen some of their works in the past on different sights. They all think as one and are on the same team, which I know you know. I’m sure the prosecution is more than aware of all their workings. I’m done with it and won’t bring it up again. I had seen Katie but I knew DB fit the profile. I’m sure they all had a part in the creation and follow through. This of course, is just my own personal observations and opinion. I hope all are having a Great Sunday!
Invited… yes, the link to Cindy is clear in the Dom Casey ‘workproduct’ in discovery. Then there is the timing.
Interesting note– the letter annotations in handwriting by a clerk says “Copies to State & Defense on 11/13/10″ initialled by the clerk.
So why would Ms. Lyon need to attend in person two days later, pay five dollars, to get her own copy of the same? Unless she needed to attend in person to see the original letter and any identity connected with it. The letter may have been redacted and in the same form as made public through SSL, so to keep that form of the release, perhaps no unredacted copy was supplied to Ms. Lyon, or of course, to anyone else.
Also, Ms. Lyon attending with one or both of his PI’s, Mr. Smith, Mr. Lyon, might also be able to have these folks view the original.
IF Ms. Lyon was given a copy of the letter in its complete form, then wouldn’t the SSL kick in again for the unredacted form of the letter? The press might press for a complete copy if so.
Next Friday national AM shows (a likely opening for more media ops)– will we see the writer on MSNBC Today, or will we see her on Fox? (too bad Springer is only in rerun).
‘her PI’s'– innocent mistake, really.
Nauseated, cause they never really were searching for a live Caylee, they were searching for ‘circumstances’ and diversion sightings. Oh, and George was busy with his real work at the command center.
Deborah Bromley is not just a random blogger with the “Caylee Alive” bunch. She has a much closer relationship with the Anthonys.
I am aware, as is OCSO. Care to elaborate for the BOC readers?
B
George should have written a letter titled, “Living under a microscope beside my murdered granddaughters hair.”
Blink, I never cease to learn from other’s thinking and evaluating differently than I do, things I would never consider to consider in ways I wouldn’t think of. I guess it’s background and experience too, exposure to the types of problems/solving and practice!
Today Maura has posted an interesting review at hinkymeter as she was familiar with the Casey-supporter’s use of the Collier thesis as their complete text source on the subject, it seems.
Maura also points out the Nancy Grace show from August 2008, with commentary by none other than defense forensic expert, Mark Kobilinsky. I’m going to link and quote that here too, hope Maura doesn’t mind. If anyone is going to suggest it takes at least 90 days for a black band to occur, no other choice as the letter suggests, then it would be the well-known purported defense consultant/expert such as MK– and there’s nothing of the sort in his responses here: (why didn’t the defense suggest a plan of answers for their own expert– stupid move)
(Quote)
GRACE: In my mind, yes. Let`s go out to Lawrence Kobilinsky, forensic scientist, joining us out of New York. Koby (ph), if the fluid and the hair in the trunk of the car turn out to be Caylee, which I hope it is not — if it does turn out to be a match to Caylee and there was a smell of a decomposed body — Caylee`s missing, last seen with her mother — what do you think about the possibility of a conviction on that alone?
LARRY KOBILINSKY, FORENSIC SCIENTIST: Well, I think that they should be able to get a conviction just based on that. We don`t need a body. And examining the hair — there are sometimes telltale signs on hair as to whether the hair was post-mortem or not. There`s a band that forms nearby the roots. So they might be able to tell if this was a hair that came off post-mortem.
Now, obviously, when you put the smell of decomposition together with some biological substance, which could very well be fluids of decomposition, and hair — we don`t know how many hairs, whether it was a clump, whether it was pulled, whether it fell out. There`s a lot that we don`t know. But putting that all together, it certainly sounds very suspicious, and I think a good prosecutor can make a case out of this, even without a body.
GRACE: Koby — with us is Dr. Lawrence Kobilinsky, forensic scientist — explain to us how you can tell, with a little more specificity — how you can tell from a hair whether it`s in life or post-mortem.
KOBILINSKY: Well, there`s been some research done on post-mortem hair, and adjacent to the root — obviously, the root is connected to the shaft of the hair — there is a dark band that forms. How wide that forms, we really don`t know, but it does form. And so if that hair had fallen out after an individual dies, it would — you would look for that banding pattern. That would be one good indication that it is a post-mortem hair.
GRACE: And Koby, how long does it take post-mortem — after death — for the band, the dark band, to appear between the shaft and the nucleus, the root of the hair?
KOBILINSKY: Well, there haven`t been very many studies, but it happens over a very short time course — hours, and perhaps a day, perhaps two days. But it should form and they should be able to see it.
(Unquote)
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0808/01/ng.01.html
(oops, Koby, not Mark… )
Thanks, Everyone for great insights. Naturally, Kleat, you’ve really shone a light onto that hair evidence. Ty.
It occurs to me that light-colored, fine hair doesn’t have a medula layer. (I’m blonde, if you couldn’t tell.)
That could account for a more rapid transference/occurrence of the death band.
The medulla (central core of the hair; the pith, if you will) is spongy and dense, which might slow that process in darker, coarse hair. I’m curious about research done in that area. My background is only cursory in that area, but I do think you’re on to something big.
And another nut falls from the Anthony Tree…………
http://blogs.myspace.com/470106812
The ‘letter’ asks “why no one has questioned…. or looked more closely at numerous others who are potential suspects including Ryan Pasley… believed to be Caylee’s father” (pg 4, second pp from bottom)
If this was an invited letter with some ‘ideas’ proposed to cover, then Ryan Pasley is currently, the possible unspoken ‘suspect’ of the defense.
No wonder, listen to his police interview again, paying particular attention to Pt 2, and the call from Cindy to Ryan, with warning about Casey’s lies, stealing and sociopath. Then Pt 3 near the beginning, where Pasley talks about being called by Baez 2 or 3 days after Caylee was reported missing, after Pasley had already spoken with police as that’s referenced. Baez asked if Ryan would be a person to use as a good character reference for Casey, Ryan says unlikely ‘I’m gonna be a big detriment to your case’, and then Ryan says Baez responds with “Yeah, you’re probably right.”
So, a male friend of Casey’s is going to be a big detriment to the defense’s case and now ‘THE letter’ with a clear pointing towards Ryan Pasley as potential suspect.
Minimally they will want to discredit this person who knows a bit too much about what Casey was like, about the Sports Authority situation, what Cindy told him about the warning to stay away from Casey because she ‘is a sociopath’. (we know how the defense works to throw mud at innocent people)
Ryan was going to consider visiting Casey in jail, to see if he could help out at all, but that seems to have never happened.
PT 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_TN9Q1g7kBk&feature=related
PT 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XRHW8YPV9xA&feature=related
PT 3: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZcCq2bXFohk&feature=related
The FBI tested the DNA from the skeletal remains. To whose DNA did they compare the autopsy DNA to determine it was Caylee?
Could the FBI have subsequently run Caylee’s DNA through a multiple of databases to see if there was a paternal match out there? Could the prosecution already have that information?
You would think someone would tell the Anthonys and their followers that there should be no disputing the fact that it was Caylee in the woods.
DayLily, who wrote that rant? Is it even Myspace? (whose page is it called ‘Casey’?)
Trial date expected…….
http://www.wesh.com/news/22264076/detail.html
Word Girl, thanks, but you MUST read Vahall’s real evaluation! It’s discrediting the Letter writer’s conclusion without even bothering to discuss the age difference possibilities. (still we have not seen any results from research testing using the parameters of a 32 month old female, blonde child to replicate the conditions of the Anthony case)
The latest letter to the court is not for trial it’s for ‘media’ publication, that’s why it went to the JD for ultimate ‘media release’ via sunshine laws, just as the other letters from inmates went public. I hope the FBI was on this person’s doorstep before that became public. Ryan Pasley might have a response sometime in the future too– hope he can do something about the accusation of guilt.
If the Anthony’s were co-operating with the state I would guess they would put them on the stand early/first so they could sit in the courtroom thruout trial. Since they are not co-operative, they would be subpoenaed for thier testimony and sit outside of court waiting(not at home watching tv), to be available. This is how I understand it to be.
Thinking longer on my post…Nothing would prevent the A’s from dvr-ing the trial everyday, so they will probably be 1st to testify. That means their testimony will be debunked by EVERYONE who takes the stand thereafter. Judge Strickland has allowed them to run out the courtroom, but these are just hearings, once the trial starts I doubt it. Cindy is bound to get banned for the trial early on anyway.
Thanks Kleat – interesting info,i think the state knows ALOT and has been ON to the variety of people involved, also i thought the letter was handwritten/dated 1/13/10 – i could be wrong