Caylee/Casey Anthony Case: George Anthony Is Under The Microscope
George Anthony can stands all he can stands and he cain’t stands no More!
Yesterday, in an exclusive interview with Fox’s Holly Bristow, George Anthony read aloud a letter he wrote over Thanksgiving regarding his and his families plight of living “under the microscope.”
This is the same Holly Bristow that Cindy parked her SUV in rush hour traffic, ran to her news van, banged on the window and shaking her finger screamed to the driver that Holly would NOT be getting any more exclusives.
You can find Dr. Lillian Glass’s assessment of George’s appearance here.
Apparently George feels there is plenty of blame for his strife including bloggers looking for their 15 minutes of fame. Huh?
It would seem to me that in George, Lee and Cindy Anthony’s initial 15 minutes of LAME, they begged the media, the public and Law Enforcement to look for Caylee Marie Anthony THEIR WAY and without any scrutiny of the possibilities of how she got THAT WAY.
The Blinkoncrime contributing editors would like to remind Mr. Anthony that to our knowledge, the only thing that landed under a microscope in the search for his murdered granddaughter was her hair with a deathband at the proximal end; removed from his daughter’s trunk.
The rest of the scrutiny, sir, is of your OWN DOING.
You S O L I C I T E D help from OCSO.
You S O L I C I T E D help from the media.
You S O L I C I T E D help from the public.
You S O L I C I T E D help from the Padillas.
You S O L I C I T E D help from TES.
You S O L I C I T E D help from Private Investigators.
What utterly jams me about you people is your unmitigated gall that you think you can control events.
You have treated anyone in any capacity as if they should open their mouths, take the Anthony spoonful and ignore your hand in our wallets in the process.
You solicited public funds without a license to do so and misled thousands as to where your GRANDDOLLARS were going.
I would ask you how many granddollars your dignity cost you but as I have noted in an earlier “Microscope View” you were devoid of it before Caylee was murdered.
You have openly admitted to following witnesses in this case.
You directed Dominick Casey to spend the bulk of his time trying to dig up dirt on the very people your daughter duped for years; not to find Caylee mind you, but to take the heat off Casey.
How many decent people have YOUR efforts put under the microscope?
Mr. Anthony, I began work on Caylee’s case LONG before I had ever written about it because she was M I S S I N G. I put together a research team and we busted our humps daily to help find her, and to stop you and yours from using her as your personal ATM.
The fact is, these “bloggers” for the most part, all did more to find your granddaughter than you or any member of your family ever has.
When she was found and OCSO and the FBI spent 72 hours straight at the site to make sure they had all this baby’s bones what did you do?
You called the very people whose hands extracted almost every teensy bone of this cherub “effing flunkies” and ordered them out of your house.
What you, your family and cronies have never understood, is that THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH YOU. I don’t give a whip if you pierce your pinky toe. I don’t care about any of your proclivities whatsoever.
What I VERY MUCH care about, is justice for Caylee Marie Anthony.
My team and I will work as diligently as we always have to ensure she gets it and that her legacy is restored.
As long as you continue to publicly lie, omit, evade and demonstrate your overall inability to accept what has happened to your only grandchild at the hands of your daughter, you can expect a slot on my slide at every opportunity.
You knew on July 15. I could throw a rock from your roof to where Caylee laid in festering garbage. Shame on You.
You want out of the spotlight? Tell the truth. You might even try it before Dominick Casey cuts a deal and tells it for you.
Related Posts
Related Posts:
907 Comments
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
Casey Anthony’s Check Fraud Trial Delayed
http://www.cfnews13.com/News/Local/2010/1/18/casey_anthonys_check_fraud_case_delayed.html
Reported by Adam Longo
ORLANDO — Casey Anthony’s check fraud trial was supposed to start Jan. 25.
However, News 13 has learned the trial isn’t going to happen.
What the flaz?
Just fyi everyone, you guys will need to talk amongst yourselves more than I will be able to participate over the next few days, I will be on location for a separate case.
B
ddex
My thinking is, the A’s will be called first or near first. It’s just my opinion though, It seems to me that they would start with the 911 call and work back from there.
I don;t believe they will be allowed to behave the way they have in court though, and I will say that I was at the last hearing and there are notices on the back of the seats stating you can;t chomp gum in court, it’s high time the baliff puts a stop to that! imo
Also , I’m looking forward to one of them telling the ASA that a question is not relevent in front of a jury. LOL I have a feeling that’s not going to go over very well.
Check fraud trial delayed and hearing this week delayed.
http://www.cfnews13.com/News/Local/2010/1/18/casey_anthonys_check_fraud_case_delayed.html?cid=rss
westsidehudson, Thanks for the information.
A quote from that article reads:
“However, News 13 has learned the trial isn’t going to happen.”
The title said delay- inside its not going to happen… So is she going to plead guilty? Or is this just another put off tactic?
Seeing eye-
Yes, please elaborate- What is her connection to the Anthony’s?
Delayed!!! What!? Could that be the reason behind the timing of ‘the letter’??? New evidence to be looked into– need time? That might cause the delay for the trial update, but can’t possibly have anything to do with the cheque fraud case, can it?
When the cf link decides to work, maybe that will explain.
when will Judge Strickland tell the defense, time is up. does every person in jail get afforded the same amount of delays for their trials?
Me too. Ya know, I just can’t seem to “turn on my heart light” when it comes to the Anthony’s. I’m secretly wishing for at least one contempt charge.
Imo, there is no incentive for OCSO to charge them regardless. That said, if something is chargable can solidify something in the case to help a conviction ( motive, as an example) they just might.
B
Ok– neither case is going forward on the scheduled dates apparently. (from WSH’s link above– thanks girl!)
So, ‘certain depos’ haven’t yet been taken– ie: Dominick Casey perhaps? (he is doing a downright noble job for his clients by successfully delaying any depo for the past year)
What has this ‘letter writer’ and the timing of those letter claims, have to do with delays of the criminal trial given this ‘new defense’ information? (nothing new, and besides, trial does not start for many months, there’s time). Are these delays because the defense has nada to give the judge re: discovery due the prosecution, in early Feb??
“ORLANDO — Casey Anthony’s check fraud trial was supposed to start Jan. 25.
However, News 13 has learned the trial isn’t going to happen….
Meanwhile in Anthony’s murder case, there are still motions connected to the case that haven’t been heard, such as a change of venue.
Sources told News 13 certain depositions still haven’t been taken.
According to sources, a court hearing connected to Anthony’s murder case scheduled for this week also will not take place.”
http://blogs.myspace.com/470106812
January 16, 2010 – Saturday
please read!!!!!!!!!
from the very beginning Casey has been the only suspect.which is unproper procedure.during a missing persons case child or adult you are supposed to look at every angle, and every person. in the situation,instead Casey was the prime suspect, the ones who were questioned were questioned about her,in one of her police interviews she was asked why she didnt call the police she told them that she was afraid for her daughters life afraid she might never see her again afraid for her and her families life and afraid of the unknown. my question is why was that never followed up on? now it was being said that there was DNA in the trunk from a dead body. which was later proven false, the only hair in that trunk was from 17 police officers,with sloppy police work. it was being said she was out partying while caylee was missing. that a bunch of photos were taken. well once again false information.those photo’s were taken in october of 2006 and may of 2008,well before caylee dissapeared. now its said she never cared about caylee. on her cupid profile it says im a single mom and my daughter is the love of my life,
theres more:
Yes TM2
And I hope they will be turned away if they are not dressed appropriately, and bring beverages (what’s really in that bottle cindy?).
Thanks for attending the hearing.
The only time I attended trial was very personal (homicide). Seating was limited,anyone could attend. A classroom of students showed up and took up seating, no isle, so both sides of the case were crammed together. Very hostile if you can imagine. The judge did state that the students or anyone in the public had the right to attend,1st come ect…
Norrie! ha ha ha ha ha — “George should have written a letter titled, “Living under a microscope beside my murdered granddaughters hair.” LOL!!!! Very funny. LMAO . . .
Ok, Blink, you asked for more information on the letter writer, DB.
The Deborah Bromley who wrote the JD letter currently lives in Cleveland, OH, but spent at least part of her growing-up years in Niles, OH, the same town where George grew up. She (also known as Deborah Joyce) is president of an organization devoted to promoting awareness of toxins in our food and environment. She was formerly a researcher at the NASA Lewis Research Center, a professional staff member of Cleveland State University, and a Corning research contractor. I found all this information by using my trusty ole search engine.
BTW, I would bet just about all the money I have that at least one of the Anthony clan had great input into the contents of the letter.
http://primewriter.com/news-1246-headlines/?p=2745
Casey Anthony case update: trial date expected soon (photos)
Posted by Melissa Finlay On January – 18 – 2010
And Bromley stated that she was a self-proclaimed NASA Scientific Researcher on WS and Topix, did she?
DARKLY funny, that is. I don’t want to imply that any of this is funny. But your line sure was. ha ha ha . . .
Trina wrote:
I wonder if Dante is in Chicago, the windy city?
Did Lee go with the search party at Blanchard park?
It takes at least 90 days of a hair being in a cadaver’s scalp in the right bacterial environment for a dark postmortem band to form before it falls out according to several forensic research papers and studies so based on the amount of time that had passed since Caylee went missing, the hair could not be hers or turned dark from another cause such as long term exposure to heat, light, contaminants, etc.
Secondly, chloroform commonly forms from a combination of antibacterial cleaning products (also according to recent research studies) which Cindy claimed she used, and the police claimed there was a large amount of chloroform found, yet no one detected a smell, which they should have if this is true.
A horrible smell can be produced from maggots, and the guy who towed the car in his statement said he removed the bag and tossed it over the fence. This is why Cindy flipped out when she first smelled the car because the bag had been removed and she didn’t know where the smell came from.
I would like to add that many of the searches that have been conducted in fields in the remote areas where Casey’s phone pinged is around the road where Jesus Ortiz was killed in the car accident (the alleged father of Caylee — and to me he looks like Caylee according to his MySpace pictures). In one of the roommate’s statements Casey had said she wanted to go visit the place where he died a couple times so that could explain why she was there.
Also, Casey described the entire family of Zenaida (not the Zenaida the police targeted), including sister Samantha, father Victor, and mother Gloria who Casey said lived on E. Michigan & police claimed there was no one there by that name. Well there was a Gloria Gonzalez living at 5550 E. Michigan who had her home foreclosed on in April and she was forced to move likely shortly before Caylee disappeared. This same Gloria and a Zenaida were previously found living within a few blocks of each other in Fort Lauderdale, and Cindy said Zenaida had a Fort Lauderdale cellphone number.
Additionally, who could have been watching Caylee for a year and a half, Caylee knew Zanny and used her name, a Gloria Gonzalez worked at the same hotel as Jesus Ortiz where he was a doorman, and all of these families seem to have connections with Puerto Rico & Casey’s friends just came back from there too.
This is all too coincidence to me and there is a lot of doubt with their so-called evidence. I really think people are not being given all the facts, I hope the defense has the funds to do their own testing, and all these avenues have not been explored enough in terms of where Caylee could be if still alive, and I am hoping she still is and someone is able to track her down soon.
By the way, I just wanted to be clear in my post#495. I have been a juror in 3 trails, so my experience has been that anyone who testifies is held in a seperate room, and isn’t allowed in the courtroom during the trail, with some exceptions after they testify. I wasn’t implying that the Anthony’s would get up and leave during “upsetting” testimony, as I don’t believe they will be in the court. I was speaking more to their, and I say this term loosely, “supporter’s” who would do anything to disrupt the court or make lame outbursts on Casey’s behalf. Its’ amazing that there would be people who would do that, but I’m sure we could all name a dozen or more “crazies” who have “attached” themselves to this case to suck off as much “fame and fortune” as they can get (read Joy Wray).
May be there isn’t a trial because she is going to plead guilty in front of the Judge.
hearing on Thursday is still on, so is the fraud trial, still scheduled officially on the docket. Don’t know where channel 13 got it’s info, maybe just a rumour so far.
Local Orlando news says hearing has been moved to Monday (the day of the fraud trial) and the fraud trial has been delayed due to some depositions not taken. We know the State is ready, so who was lask in not getting their depositions done? Delay tactic or maybe they are close on a plea.
yeah pamela
I knew what you were trying t convey. I do not think judge strickland will allow them to do as they had been. I hope he puts order in the court along with their crazie supporters. It just their class dont you think? or lack of any class.
According to the Orlando Sentinel “…..the defense has not interviewed the victim, Amy Huizenga, under oath yet”. What the hay? Can they do this? Cause a delay.
What the…
How can they claim to not have interviewed Amy H yet? There’s only two ways that the judge can look at it (imo) either it’s on purpose as a stall or they’re the most unprofessional group of attys on the planet.
How can any one defendant be allowed this much latitude? How could their lack of preparation be accepted? That’s supposed to be their job, I don’t get it.
This stinks if they are given yet another pass.
How can any of this be substantiated since today is a holiday? Is there some ESP going on? Any body have a clue who the source for the info is?
It is a confirmed possibility, that’s all I can say. No other info right now, except that I know the rumor started from Baez himself. Perhaps he has learned to “e” file.
B
Sosad, I”m guessing that they had no intention to go to trial on this one, and so didn’t bother to depo Amy, maybe they hadn’t decided what they might want to ask her to trip her up at trial, otherwise, what would they learn that they would want to save asking for the main trial anyway. (if you can figure what I just said, then I think it’s probably what the defense is sort of doing, like confuddled what to do).
Also, it’s a delay tactic, but to what benefit? Just irritate the judge for the defense spending all it’s time in the NYC media studios and spinning other stuff as garbage flack instead of doing their JOB for their client!
It does seem to show some lack of planning and makes one think they still don’t have a clue what they are up to. Maybe Blink is right, there’s a fissure formed in the dream team.
Yep.
B
MJ, you said it better than I did! Will the judge finally tell the defense to pay attention and stop grandstanding with their communal-pat-on-the-back and sly smiles as they hit the studios. How can they not have prepared interrogatories for Amy? Maybe it’s just holding the card for delays. Someone give Stan one of those world’s smallest violins so he can make his point when he sees them next.
seeing-eye, thanks for the info. If they A’s did have input, as it seems likely they are pulling strings, then the reveal of Pasley as suspect, is not some misplaced idea by some fringe unknown. Maybe the A’s have her on a ‘letter of agreement’ as ‘hired’ with attached ‘confidentiality agreement’. Why not try it, it seems to work for them so far.
Yikes Chica! I thought you had went over to the dark side! I did not read your first words- Trina wrote:
Thanks for the info seeing eye, very interesting.
MJ I agree with your thoughts. If they haven’t even interviewed Amy yet, and Lyons is on a book tour, OMO they never intended to be in court that day…..
Although I am all for first amendment rights, what I will never be able to fully comprehend is Judge Strickland not putting a gag order on the defense, at least Baez, Lyons, and Baden. George and Cindy? Fine. They want to exploit, and basically extort, the memory and everything else that should be held and retained by that harmless loving 2 year old girl by going on a media blitz for payment of what garbage and untruths that flow from their self-centered, self-perceived victimization by society who actually dares to call them out for not cooperating with justice and righting a monsterous wrong.
Thanks chica, do you have a link to your post 667- I’m interested to know if they mention the name of the hotel
Baez has nothing, so they decide to go with the only chance they have, which is reasonable doubt. One tactic I think people use when they know what they are claiming is utterly false and have nothing of any substance, is repetition. This is a staple for alot of politicians as well. Tell people long enough the same rhetoric, it’s bound to be believed by some as gospel eventually.
I wonder if all of the ‘Anthony supporters’, who see their one chance at fame, notoriety, along with the possible present and future monies involved for them to take advantage of…I wonder if the supporters would have stayed around within the first few days, if there was absolutely no media covering this case, no possible book deals, no interviews, etc. Same with George and Cindy. I wonder if they would have been a bit more cooperative with law enforcement had their been no talk show invites, no national recognition of who the A’s even were, no crabpuffs, cruises, misappropriation of funds by a fraudulent non-profit organization, nothing. I wonder if they would have been truthful in regards to what they know by now
CFnews has backed off it’s story– headline is there, contents not.
Suppose it’s the MLK day that has slowed the clerk’s office.
No, Todd they wouldn’t have been truthful in any case. They are the real “People of the Lie”.
It looks like the fraud case will be delayed. Does this change your mind, Blink, about a plea deal? Surely they wouldnt go to the trouble to ask for a change of venue if they were going to plea – would they?
no, not in the fraud case.
B
In the light of all the letter crazies, and the other obvious attempts by some to obtain their fifteen minutes of fame & fortune through access to media, the Net, or any of the principles connected to the case, does anyone think the KC jury will have to be sequestered by the judge?
I know Blink and others do not expect the murder case to even go to trial. However, Casey might want her place in the limelight. She has a high opinion of her abilities to sway people. On with the media circus, the nut-job interference and perhaps a crack at jury tampering by devotees of Casey’s.In which case, it could be a matter of jury survival to sequester the members. Any thoughts?
How about this– the pre-trial is postponed to the date of the start of the fraud case, why? Maybe it’s saving time, two birds with one stone. Say the fraud trial will be plead out on Monday, the defense et al has to show up to do that at the last minute. So why get the troop to come in from out of town for Thursday, then have to travel back for Monday when you can do everything in one day– just plead out on the fraud trial, and do the pre-trial matters all at once. (couldn’t do it the other way around)
I had a SNEAKING suspicion after writing that last post so went back to ‘myclerk’– YEP, the Gagne ‘Cancelled’ hearing is BACK ON the docket again now!! So now that the pre-trial has been cancelled for Casey, Bradley Conway can move his own case back into it’s original slot!
01/21/2010 CANCELED Hearing (9:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Adams, John H, SR)
Cancelled
01/21/2010 Hearing (9:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Adams, John H, SR)
Case Management
01/27/2010 Pre-Trial Conference (9:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Adams, John H, SR)
02/08/2010 Trial (9:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Adams, John H, SR)
(note also that the Pre-Trial is booked for the same slot as the Anthony Fraud trial and Brad hasn’t taken steps yet to change this date as he did for the 21st– so this is telling perhaps of the plea deal. If Brad thought that the fraud trial might go ahead, he’d book another date for Holly earlier than later).
http://myclerk.myorangeclerk.com/CaseDetail.aspx?CaseID=6549856
(holly gagne criminal case page)
I wonder if the media will catch on to the quick change on this one and report on it?
chica, from your post above from “Trina”
“Additionally, who could have been watching Caylee for a year and a half”
did Trina not hear the news, Casey didn’t have a job therefore didn’t need a nanny…where did you find that post I would like to clue Trina in
Will Casey have to get up and take the stand in the fraud case,
even if its just to take the fifth?
This case cannot possibly go forth as a “classic textbook defense” of a defendant – in this case Casey M. Anthony. That is because it did not start off with “what was in the best interest of the defendant.” There were ULTERIOR MOTIVES involved from the get-go – the least of which involved the BEST DEFENSE STRATEGY for Casey. And that goes for EVERYONE involved in the cover-up of the murder of Caylee Marie Anthony and most of all – her defense team. The defense has lost its opportunity and ability to “right itself” and proceed with the best intentions no matter how many legal minds jump on board. Hence all the smoke and mirrors and an “offensive” strategy that is taking shape before our eyes. This case is imploding as we write, and this ship is sinking fast. There is no way out and the defense thinks the public is so stupid that we buy what they are slinging and hurling out there via the media and internet. The facts against Casey Anthony stand strong against gale force winds and the States case is built on a solid foundation. This cannot be said of the defense. There was NO foundation built by the defense from the onset that could stand against the evidence of this case. Too much time spent on ULTERIOR MOTIVES and they missed the boat.
From Richard Hornsby’s blog, http://blog.richardhornsby.com/
WordPress Upgrade Problems
Dear conspiracy theorists, my wordpress installation suffered the blank screen upgrade problem. Explanation of problem can be found here.
I had to delete old installation and reinstall. Will re-upload my old database in the next few days.
Toodles.
Posted 01/18 at 6:51pm
*******
My comment: What’s going on with his own baby killer trial?
Comment by chica — January 18, 2010 @ 3:55 pm
“Secondly, chloroform commonly forms from a combination of antibacterial cleaning products (also according to recent research studies) which Cindy claimed she used, and the police claimed there was a large amount of chloroform found, yet no one detected a smell, which they should have if this is true.”
From chica’s post,(I know those aren’t chica’s words). But as an aside, I don’t recall Cindy ever claiming/admitting to using cleaning products. Is this in any transcripts?
seeing-eye, can you enlighten us on Deb Bromley as not just an average blogger?
Here’s her post on David Lohr’s ‘The Criminal Report Daily’ just one month after Caylee was reported missing. Interesting as she says she’s not ‘stayed as informed as everybody else… I may be wrong’ and throws the ‘kidnapping scenario’ out there with details thought through that end up being just as the family has implied in their little prompting question reveals in jail visits. (George says same thing and at a time when this information is NOT yet public, IIRC, and maybe Casey hasn’t even yet got her Blanchard story out. (when were the jail visitation vids made public?)
So this Deb Bromley is not informed, further, WHO follows the case and doesn’t know how to spell Caley yet has all these other details, like what Casey used the credit cards to purchase– Cindy refused to give her JCPenny account details to Yuri, so how did Deb Bromley know about the purchase information before LE? Strange.
What is her connection to the Anthony’s??
This a post attributed to Deb Bromley. Pay attention to the last two sentences– it has become a main defense posture. How did Bromley know about what was purchased with the credit cards? Only Cindy knew that (remember Cindy argued to investigators that there was nothing in the credit card statements that was relevant– she herself went through them).
Quoting Bromley below, the possible writer of ‘the letter to Judge Strickland’.
“I have not stayed as informed as everybody else on this, and have only heard bits and pieces, so I may be wrong, but I am wondering if anyone has considered the child being kidnapped and being held because the mother was involved in something shady and illegal where she owed them a lot of money. This would explain the mother and grandmother’s claims that they briefly were “allowed” to speak with Caley like a kidnapper might allow, and might also explain why she stole credit cards to get money – because she was desperate to pay somebody back. She didn’t really buy anything tangible or expensive that I know of with the credit cards. I believe she only took cash. Possibly she was told Caley or her other family would be harmed if she told the truth, and she also would be charged with whatever illegal activity she was involved in.
Posted by: Deb Bromley | August 18, 2008 at 09:00 PM”
Ms, the thought has crossed my mind too but I’m hoping that given the fact that her defense team is prepared to do any dirty tricks in the book I think the Judge will be watching them very carefully.
Judge Strikland will have a status hearing on Monday…..
http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/entertainment_tv_tvblog/2010/01/casey-anthony-check-fraud-trial-wont-start-monday.html
Blink, when you say “No, not in the fraud case”. Does that mean it doesn’t change your mind about them working on a plea? or that you think the delay means they are intending to take it to a trial? I just can’t see where a trial would benefit anyone, and info there could definately hurt Casey.