Caylee/Casey Anthony Case: George Anthony Is Under The Microscope
George Anthony can stands all he can stands and he cain’t stands no More!
Yesterday, in an exclusive interview with Fox’s Holly Bristow, George Anthony read aloud a letter he wrote over Thanksgiving regarding his and his families plight of living “under the microscope.”
This is the same Holly Bristow that Cindy parked her SUV in rush hour traffic, ran to her news van, banged on the window and shaking her finger screamed to the driver that Holly would NOT be getting any more exclusives.
You can find Dr. Lillian Glass’s assessment of George’s appearance here.
Apparently George feels there is plenty of blame for his strife including bloggers looking for their 15 minutes of fame. Huh?
It would seem to me that in George, Lee and Cindy Anthony’s initial 15 minutes of LAME, they begged the media, the public and Law Enforcement to look for Caylee Marie Anthony THEIR WAY and without any scrutiny of the possibilities of how she got THAT WAY.
The Blinkoncrime contributing editors would like to remind Mr. Anthony that to our knowledge, the only thing that landed under a microscope in the search for his murdered granddaughter was her hair with a deathband at the proximal end; removed from his daughter’s trunk.
The rest of the scrutiny, sir, is of your OWN DOING.
You S O L I C I T E D help from OCSO.
You S O L I C I T E D help from the media.
You S O L I C I T E D help from the public.
You S O L I C I T E D help from the Padillas.
You S O L I C I T E D help from TES.
You S O L I C I T E D help from Private Investigators.
What utterly jams me about you people is your unmitigated gall that you think you can control events.
You have treated anyone in any capacity as if they should open their mouths, take the Anthony spoonful and ignore your hand in our wallets in the process.
You solicited public funds without a license to do so and misled thousands as to where your GRANDDOLLARS were going.
I would ask you how many granddollars your dignity cost you but as I have noted in an earlier “Microscope View” you were devoid of it before Caylee was murdered.
You have openly admitted to following witnesses in this case.
You directed Dominick Casey to spend the bulk of his time trying to dig up dirt on the very people your daughter duped for years; not to find Caylee mind you, but to take the heat off Casey.
How many decent people have YOUR efforts put under the microscope?
Mr. Anthony, I began work on Caylee’s case LONG before I had ever written about it because she was M I S S I N G. I put together a research team and we busted our humps daily to help find her, and to stop you and yours from using her as your personal ATM.
The fact is, these “bloggers” for the most part, all did more to find your granddaughter than you or any member of your family ever has.
When she was found and OCSO and the FBI spent 72 hours straight at the site to make sure they had all this baby’s bones what did you do?
You called the very people whose hands extracted almost every teensy bone of this cherub “effing flunkies” and ordered them out of your house.
What you, your family and cronies have never understood, is that THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH YOU. I don’t give a whip if you pierce your pinky toe. I don’t care about any of your proclivities whatsoever.
What I VERY MUCH care about, is justice for Caylee Marie Anthony.
My team and I will work as diligently as we always have to ensure she gets it and that her legacy is restored.
As long as you continue to publicly lie, omit, evade and demonstrate your overall inability to accept what has happened to your only grandchild at the hands of your daughter, you can expect a slot on my slide at every opportunity.
You knew on July 15. I could throw a rock from your roof to where Caylee laid in festering garbage. Shame on You.
You want out of the spotlight? Tell the truth. You might even try it before Dominick Casey cuts a deal and tells it for you.
Related Posts
Related Posts:
907 Comments
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
I am glad to know that OrlandoEast isn’t Cindy…I know she’s gone off the deepend, but to spew that kind of crap is untolerable.
Blink, regarding post 799, Moonbeams states Orlando East also goes by the name Joe Schmo, for some reason I think he posted here within the past few days under that name.
Thinker, yes, thanks. I know the YouTube versions of the whole (missing the end apparently) are there, but what I was thinking of, was just the small section re: the ‘fraud’ and her client caught on video with both evidence and the crime too. Someone would need to create that from the available YouTube audios.
Substance abuse OR mental health issues for someone flying a sporty jet? Even his firm’s plane, geeze. That means someone can’t drink or abuse drugs and fly within a given period of each other, and I recall Todd Mac sitting in front of a Baez bar cabinet, with the cut glass or crystal decanter on the shelf in the background, oh yeah, and he was sort of matching in his velvet appearing jacket. Eyes shifting to his off-camera collegue.
AND I can find the Blink-Link for that video too!! (or was it two of them
Moonbeams, thanks. Joe Schmoe posted here too.
Orlandoeast also alias Joe Schmo,alias Jack Jackson, Alias James Mcintyre.All have same IP address out of Tampa. Choices?
1.Nutjob wacko infatuated with Tot Mom?
2.Works for defence?
3.Someone(troll)who likes to stir the masses?
cindeefromwisconsin you have a good memory. I found one comment here by Joe Schmo (comment #199) ~ it’s a huge long rant but it’s definitely NOT pro-Anthony. Weird. Is he schizophrenic or confused?
nutjob jerk geez so joe schmo was coming here to get info to use at the the orlando sentinnel. what a jerk
sorry blink I just get sick of these creeps.Id like to flush casey and her attorney and caseys whole family and lyons !! down a HUGE HUMONGOUS SUPER KING SIZE TOILET !!!because they are crap and should be flushed as such. I said super king because casey has gained weight and baez too eating good off of this case lots of steaks and lyons cuz she probably eats anything that isnt nailed down like casey.I HAD TO VENT!!
THAT FELT GOOD!!
If OE and JOE SCHMO have the same IP address maybe they are different people using the same computer???
http://marinadedave.wordpress.com/
The gods must be crazy!
January 21, 2010 · 2 Comments
From BOC I thought Todd Maculso was brought before the bar for misuse of clients funds as per the article.
Macaluso is currently undergoing California Bar complaint proceedings, alleging millions of misused client trust accounts, as well as facing an almost 6 million dollar lawsuit from a former client.
“There was absolutely no wrongdoing on the part of Mr. Merriman,” Macaluso told The Associated Press by phone. “He essentially was doing what was appropriate under the circumstances in trying to protect the safety of Miss Tequila. There were numerous eyewitnesses that will support his version of the events that transpired at his home.”
Todd Macaluso is back in court on the Bar charges September 23, 2009.
Is this his excuse, either drinking problem or mental health problems. You say he has to check in instead of going to trial. Is he on probation. Wouldn’t his credibility be be comprised by staying with the defense team? I do not understand, sorry.
That is all correct, yes.
He is undergoing a program designed to allow an alternative to discipline for lawyers suffering from some sort of emotional or substance abuse issues. That requires a mostly monthly status check in, but can be done telephonically on occasion. I am clueless as to how he did not get smacked in Orange County for witholding his pending Bar Discipline/charges initially. My guess is the burden is not on Judge Strickland to run down his affairs out of state.
That said, I have not heard a word from him in some time, but I am not sure if an attorney admitted pro hoch vice has to praecipe to withdraw.
B
http://www.cfnews13.com/News/Local/2010/1/20/casey_anthony_case_back_in_court_monday.html
Casey Anthony Case Back In Court Monday
Wednesday, January 20, 2010 10:12:21 PM
Reported by Adam Longo
ORLANDO — Casey Anthony will be back in court Monday, but it won’t be for a trial in her check fraud case.
That case was originally scheduled to begin Monday, and News 13 was the first to learn the trial would not move forward as planned.
Legal experts believe the reason Anthony’s check fraud trial won’t start Monday is because they said she’s ready to change her plea.
Casey has thus far pled not guilty to charges she stole checks from friend Amy Huizenga, cashed them at a local bank and used them to buy goods at a Target store.
While there’s no confirmation at all that Anthony plans to change her plea at a hearing on Monday, it wouldn’t be the first time a high profile defendant surprised everyone with a plea change.
In November at a pre-trial hearing, former astronaut Lisa Nowak pled guilty to a reduced charge and avoided prison time.
What’s not clear with Anthony is if any deal has been struck between her lawyers and prosecutors.
Legal experts said a felony conviction on check fraud charges wouldn’t come up in her murder case unless she took the stand.
But does the defense really lose anything with a guilty plea?
That’s not all expected to play out on Monday.
Sources said two different motions will be heard by the judge.
The first deals with the Texas EquuSearch group.
Anthony’s lawyers filed papers with the court back in November saying, “evidence discovered by the defense shows that statements made by TES (Texas EquuSearch) to the court were inaccurate.”
EquuSearch handed over documents stating only 32 volunteer searchers combed through the area where Caylee’s remains were eventually found.
The defense found at least two others who offered sworn statements, and News 13 talked to a man in November who said he searched in that area.
Anthony’s defense believes EquuSearch hasn’t been forthcoming and they are once again demanding all documents relating to the search for Caylee.
The other motion expected deals with Jill Kerley, an ex-wife of meter reader Roy Kronk
Sorry, OT, does anyone know if Holly Gagne had her pre-trial hearing today with her lawyer, Mr. Conway. It had been taken off the court schedule and then put back on. I wonder if the Anthony’s went to support her and she did for them.
A poster on another site says that casey googled zaneida on June 12th, 3 days before the nanny takes caylee. Does anyone know if this statement is true or not ? I had never heard this
#807 – Lynn
Thank you for explaining what a troll is..I knew it wasn’t a good thing to be a troll and felt it was best not to ask.
Regarding joe schmoe, I once used that name in a hypothetical comment, and was told that there was a real person in florida with that name.so it may be two different people posting
Orlandoan, yes, Cindy warned Tony the night she picked up Casey, Cindy warned Ryan Pasley that she was a sociopath (Ryan lent Casey about 400 dollars), Cindy said he should stay away from Casey (Casey and Ryan knew each other since about 3 years old).
I think Joe Schmo was one of the spoilers of the Bill Schaeffer blog. No wonder the place was trashed, can’t find the archives of comments, but am sure he/she was one of those I saw last time I tried to read anything. (which was quite some time now– why bother with that going on).
Now they are trying to close the barn door after the sides have fallen down. http://www.wftv.com/caseyanthonyblog/index.html
Just catching up. Comment to #507, why is it when you look at casey’s log from jail, it shows a daily subsistence fee of 1.50, but right underneath the fee it shows a credit of -1.50, so she is not being charged this fee???? Is this a fee for all prisoners and if so, why does she get off without paying this fee????
elmosmommmy – The following is documented. Remember, this is the Anthony computer. We don’t know WHO was doing the searches.
6/12/2008 11:15pm. Anthony’s desktop PC showed somebody was searching for “Zenaida”, “Age 25″ “Fernandez”, “Gonzalez”, and “Jacksonville”
I got a smackdown on that data once, but that was also my understanding.
B
I found this information on James McIntyre (Joe Schmo, Orlandoeast, etc.)
Apparently he is a disbarred lawyer with an extremely shady past.
http://kingfish1935.blogspot.com/2008/08/james-mcintyre-will-work-for-food.html
http://www.wftv.com/news/22311664/detail.html
“Casey’s Defense Wants Focus To Stay On Kronk
Posted: 7:48 am EST January 22, 2010
Updated: 8:04 am EST January 22, 2010
Comment On This Story ››
ORANGE COUNTY, Fla. — New motions in the case against Casey Anthony show the defense is still trying to pin Caylee’s murder on meter reader Roy Kronk.
The defense wants to depose one of his ex-wives who claims Kronk bounded her with duct tape more than once while they were married.
Caylee’s body was found with duct tape over her mouth.
Meanwhile, prosecutors in the case are once again requesting that Casey’s lawyers disclose the witnesses they plan to call and begin questioning the investigators in the case.
Both sides are aiming for a trial in the summer of 2010. ”
I sure hope that Roy and his lawyer are preparing for this. Cheech!
http://www.thehinkymeter.com/?p=1491
Valhall articulated a piece of work I was very impressed with.
Loved it! Loved it!
“The defense wants to depose one of his ex-wives who claims Kronk bounded her with duct tape more than once while they were married.”
Good. Then the state can depose her as well. Is this the same person who wrote glowing remarks about Kronk on Scared Monkeys earlier in the case?
Interesting ada.
I think I’m going to go dee-tal (postal) on someone real soon. How the He!! did Kronk make Casey Anthony NOT report her child missing – EVER? What did he do, tell her he’s just borrowing little Caylee for a while and if she goes out partying and dancing, he’ll return her when he’s done with her. CHEESEANDRICE BAEZ, WHAT ARE YOU THINKING?
Cops to KC, “when was the last time you saw your child?” KC, “June 9th”
OK we’ll check that out.
Hey KC, there’s pics of little Caylee with your grandfather on June 15th. KC, “Oh sorry, it must have been June 15th or 16th, what’s the big deal? Why get so picky about the last time I saw MY baby? What’s wrong with you guys?”
Kleat (819), Bill Sheaffer’s blog has been de-trolled. Our man Craig stepped in, took control, and kicked some major troll butt. It’s a fine blog these days.
If you haven’t seen this and watch it, get your hankies out. BAEZ, this is how you’re client should have acted. Listen carefully about accusing an INNOCENT person.
Diena Thompson on the Today show.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/35006253#35006253
Ok, Casey’s defense has had some anonymous donor, unnamed. Can’t tell any financial transactions from that.
Now comes Ms. Kerley with alleged major medical needs aka major medical expenses, and she’s willing to give the necessary information to get Casey, what Richard Hornsby calls, her best shot and something that might work.
Kerley might be gaining some benefit or promise of benefit, nicely hidden in another ‘anonymous donor’ for her health needs, expensive health needs. Or other benefit that stems from her cooperation. There must be ways of making this distant enough from Casey, afterall, a rich donor like the one Casey had from Baltimore (?). Can’t stop someone from making a donation, maybe promises of health care, or maybe that idea of gain might be in Kerley’s imagination.
Now, let’s assume Kronk is considered a suspect by LE and the FBI. How did he get the baby and when? Because if Caylee had been taken from the home, who is the person who was threatening the family and Casey, and why was Casey too afraid to tell mommy and daddy? It makes no sense without Kronk having a tie to Casey that she could talk about.
Casey, any mother, would call the police or for help if the child was taken in a shopping center, or from a parked car. Right, go off to have sex, drugs, booze and parties because your parents might be angry with you! Casey needs to explain when Caylee went missing and how because she is still not talking. What if she had given the LE and FBI the right scenario to begin with, even after the month delay/mistake, Casey is responsible for allowing a kidnapper to be protected– why? Because Casey didn’t want Caylee back– or she should just tell the FBI NOW what she knows about where she was, where Caylee was, at the time the baby disappeared from her mother’s arms or car.
Blink,
I am wondering, if Casey takes the plea. Might we see
her talk in court, with some sorry A$$ excuse to AMY! Needed
your money cause I was on the run. Sorry Amy, Honey you know
I would have paid it back! Also on Monday would Amy be in court,
or not have to show up? Thanks!
I’ve seen a lot of Joe Schmo comments, but I can’t remember where. I’ve looked at so many blogs during the last year and a half, I can’t remember anything. But I do recognize that name.
Could it have been George or Cindy on the computer 6/12 searching for info on zenaida. George trying to play detective and Cindy trying to find out more info on the person Casey was claiming was watching Caylee?? Not sure what, if anything i believe about this case anymore. Kinda feeling down about it to be honest:(
No matter what was done in the past or is what is done to Casey now, this little angel lost her life!! When i take a minute and stop trying to “figure out” Casey and what happened to Caylee, my heart just aches, purely aches at the thought of that beautiful little girl all alone, tossed into the woods… I just hope SOMETHING good can come out of this, although sometimes i am not sure what…..
WHAT HAPPENED TO ZANNY THE NANNY? how can the defense jump around all of casey’s earlier statements and how do they ever! connect zanny to Kronk..and Kronk to the house to her car…casey asked the neighbor for the shovel backed her car into the garage…to amy about the dead squirell smell about her car? so all of the money wasted by the public and L.E. about Zanny is nothing now? Her statements all at the beginning where Zanny Zanny HER HER HER not him him i hope this backfires in such a huge way…oh yeah how about the duct tape on the anthony gas cans..let alone George’s signs everywhere around town with that duct tape? how do they get around zanny!?!?
Is it possible that if George and cohorts learned of the activities around the Suburban woods, including Kronk’s calls/police radio transmissions, wouldn’t ex-police detective, keeping his low profile, have investigated the Kronk calls and Kronk himself, with his own police and lawyer friends, the family and Casey’s own PI? We haven’t seen a stitch of George’s communications using PI Dom Casey to investigate Kronk, but he was doing his thing, just playing the ‘head in sand’ person, which he is definitely not.
I also think it’s possible, no, highly likely, that George investigated Casey’s activities in the year or two before Caylee went missing, and knew a lot about what Casey was (and was NOT) up to in those years. There was some reason they treated Casey like a ticking timebomb.
Both sides are aiming for a trial in the summer of 2010.
http://www.wftv.com/news/22311664/detail.html
Motion to Take Deposition to Perpetuate Testimony of Jill Kerley
http://www.wftv.com/pdf/22313192/detail.html
Motion to modify the courts order
http://www.wftv.com/pdf/22313189/detail.html
State of Florida’s Second Motion to Compel Reciprocal Discovery and Motion for Discovery Schedule
http://www.wftv.com/pdf/22313211/detail.html
The murder trial will be subject to delay tactics by the defense if they succeed in the deposition under oath, of Jill Kerley to ‘perpetuate her testimony’ to be used in trial as evidence of third party guilt by pointing her finger at Kronk.
The trial will be delayed as far as possible, each delay ensuring Ms. Jill Kerley’s heath situation is more advanced, each delay closer to being able to use the testimony in trial without any possibility of the state having the opportunity to cross-examine the witness. To date, the state has no disclosure from the defense at all, so if the defense can succeed in this deposition of Kerley for perpetuation and use in trial in the future, the state is at a big disadvantage, not having the defense’s discovery and knowing what they defense knows– big disadvantage in the depo of Kerley because they will not have the discovery to base any investigation on, before Kerley’s deposition is taken and her death, if not critical health condition, seals her words in perpetuity, without proper ability to cross by knowing what else the defense has in it’s unrevealed discovery (and there IS a reciprocal agreement to disclose).
Good tactics, delay is– delay the reciprocal disclosure, get the deposition of their best chance witness sealed in stone, and cut off the state’s position of knowledge with the reciprocal discovery, before the time-critical/deathbed testimony of Jill Kerley is taken.
The defense will make sure Kerley is out of the picture before any trial, they will delay until their typewriters run out of ribbon if that’s what it takes to make sure Kerley’s words can never been cross examined. Perfect– deathbed, sympathy for a sick woman, perfect ploy for the jury and a real problem for the state without any discovery yet, and trial within months.
Lawyer’s best trial tactics, to ensure witnesses die before trial and in this case, their own witness because it works better for them that way. They can’t wait out little Caylee as a witness any longer, they did that for months.
The defense can depose everyone from here to China and back again.
In the end all evidence will point to one person – Caylee’s caretaker – her mother, the one person responsible for her well being.
She is Caylee’s killer.
Why didn’t Scott Pederson’s defense pull a ‘Kronk type person did it’? And why not in the OJ case either? Pull someone into the crime who had the correct glove size (shrunken version of the exact glove manufacturer material specs)?
Kronk is the OJ ‘glove’, Kerley is adds the equivalent spin as the moisture damage did to the glove. It’s all in the percieved ‘fit’, in either case.
http://www.wftv.com/news/22316847/detail.html
Will Casey tell the judge that she was protecting her daughter and was directed to do this lying and stealing because Mr. Kronk had her daughter? Or will that just be implied in the capital case?
All this Kronk business is no different than the ZG subterfuge. It’s smoke and mirrors. Baez should be disbarred if he had been told of a man with so much cunning and power to intimidate casey, kidnap and then murder Caylee and he never told nor convinced his client to let the police/FBI take charge to ensure Caylee’s safety.
Baez stood right on the courthouse steps and proclaimed he knew what the deal was and we’d all find out later, that was before Caylee was even found. If he knew then he was aware that authorities were essential to the safe return of Caylee. He can’t have it both ways. Either he knew from the getgo that it was Kronk and did absolutely nothing to break the case or he was lying when he said that.
I pick that he was lying.
Kleat –
My opinion is that Casey would not do herself any favors by making excuses as she admits guilt. I believe that would irritate the judge… It doesn’t matter why she stole Amy’s money — she stole it. Of course Judge Strickland knows her story is BS…she should admit guilt and move on.
And if Kronk is Casey’s best chance, she might as well be fitted for her actual prison uniform now because that will never fly. If I were a juror, I’d be angry that they are framing the man who found Caylee’s remains…it makes no sense even with the dying ex-wife bologna!!!
And another thing…this makes me so mad!
Casey stayed cool as a cucumber, even stating to her parents and Lee that she was sure that Caylee was being cared for and that she would be home by her BDay. So are we to believe that Casey had not only been victim of her rogue nanny but the rogue nanny was victimized by Kronk?
That’s the only way they can explain it with Kronk as the perp, otherwise casey would have been naming Kronk, she had no trouble accusing ZG. she wasn’t afraid of outing ZG. There would be no logical explanation that casey would be willing to sit in jail without accusing him, the crime had been exposed. The reality is that her and baez thought that the nanny route was the best to take because she is fiction. She would never be found.
somewhere along the line shortly after LKB got involved the “Fugitive” theory came into play and suspicion was cast on Kronk. A half effort on it for a while but once there PI’s were able to dig up dirt enough to make him look tainted the full on assault began. This defense team is despicable and dirty.
That is funny. I guess Kronk had keys to Casey’s car and her parents house too!
Bill Sheaffer’s fresh blog:
http://billsheaffer.wordpress.com/2010/01/22/monday-monday/
I’d be sleeping with one eye open if I was Jill Kerley (chills, chills . . .).
I think it’s very reflective of people’s hearts through actions and attitudes. I am of the opinion that Baez and the Anthony’s lose a percentage of the already miniscule credibility pie. It’s almost as though Baez and the A’s are “opinion pollsters”, going out, testing the waters through talk shows, etc, to see what gets society(potential jurors) the most. They finally went with their survey that the Zenaida did it story wouldn’t work, so they floated around the possible alibi theory: Caylee is alive in California, a transient claims Casey spent a week with him, so she couldn’t have done it, etc. Now Baez has leeched onto Kronk’s ex-wives, in a last ditch effort for the ever-so-lovely women living on Ex-Kronk Avenue can cause reasonable doubt towards his guilty client. It’s sad that an individual can be soul-less to the extent of expressing a willingness to not only murdering your own child, but to be perfectly accepting to accuse an innocent person of your own deeds. Anyone can be involved in a difficult situation, wilfully or not, but it takes an emotionally and spiritually mature individual to accept responsibility and consequences for that action(s), in which Casey is not such a person
Everyone in Casey’s life, real or imagined, was ‘beautiful people’. Take a look at someone like Casey who had a great smile (until you know the void behind it), young, nice clothes, takes a good photograph, gets lots of male attention because they think she’s hot.
That is not public perception of a perp, child abuser, child neglector, druggie (well…), evil thoughts, planning deceptions, steals, lies, cheats her way through relationships without a glimmer of guilt or remorse.
But, Kronk is not young, he’s not a youthful, trim, muscled atheletic body, he’s not a professional like a lawyer or astronaut or architect, he’s not a ’10′, probably hasn’t got perfectly straight teeth like Casey, hasn’t got a smile that makes a sparkly flash as the sun catches a tooth and a little ‘DING!’ sounds. Anyone knows that someone without a beautiful flashy smile complete with sparkle ‘DING!’ is suspect. (geeze, what about Joy Wray who had plenty of ops to be right there in the woods, was she being set up early on by someone, as a potential nanny suspect diversion? Why was she in those woods so many times… really…)