Caylee/Casey Anthony Case: George Anthony Is Under The Microscope
George Anthony can stands all he can stands and he cain’t stands no More!
Yesterday, in an exclusive interview with Fox’s Holly Bristow, George Anthony read aloud a letter he wrote over Thanksgiving regarding his and his families plight of living “under the microscope.”
This is the same Holly Bristow that Cindy parked her SUV in rush hour traffic, ran to her news van, banged on the window and shaking her finger screamed to the driver that Holly would NOT be getting any more exclusives.
You can find Dr. Lillian Glass’s assessment of George’s appearance here.
Apparently George feels there is plenty of blame for his strife including bloggers looking for their 15 minutes of fame. Huh?
It would seem to me that in George, Lee and Cindy Anthony’s initial 15 minutes of LAME, they begged the media, the public and Law Enforcement to look for Caylee Marie Anthony THEIR WAY and without any scrutiny of the possibilities of how she got THAT WAY.
The Blinkoncrime contributing editors would like to remind Mr. Anthony that to our knowledge, the only thing that landed under a microscope in the search for his murdered granddaughter was her hair with a deathband at the proximal end; removed from his daughter’s trunk.
The rest of the scrutiny, sir, is of your OWN DOING.
You S O L I C I T E D help from OCSO.
You S O L I C I T E D help from the media.
You S O L I C I T E D help from the public.
You S O L I C I T E D help from the Padillas.
You S O L I C I T E D help from TES.
You S O L I C I T E D help from Private Investigators.
What utterly jams me about you people is your unmitigated gall that you think you can control events.
You have treated anyone in any capacity as if they should open their mouths, take the Anthony spoonful and ignore your hand in our wallets in the process.
You solicited public funds without a license to do so and misled thousands as to where your GRANDDOLLARS were going.
I would ask you how many granddollars your dignity cost you but as I have noted in an earlier “Microscope View” you were devoid of it before Caylee was murdered.
You have openly admitted to following witnesses in this case.
You directed Dominick Casey to spend the bulk of his time trying to dig up dirt on the very people your daughter duped for years; not to find Caylee mind you, but to take the heat off Casey.
How many decent people have YOUR efforts put under the microscope?
Mr. Anthony, I began work on Caylee’s case LONG before I had ever written about it because she was M I S S I N G. I put together a research team and we busted our humps daily to help find her, and to stop you and yours from using her as your personal ATM.
The fact is, these “bloggers” for the most part, all did more to find your granddaughter than you or any member of your family ever has.
When she was found and OCSO and the FBI spent 72 hours straight at the site to make sure they had all this baby’s bones what did you do?
You called the very people whose hands extracted almost every teensy bone of this cherub “effing flunkies” and ordered them out of your house.
What you, your family and cronies have never understood, is that THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH YOU. I don’t give a whip if you pierce your pinky toe. I don’t care about any of your proclivities whatsoever.
What I VERY MUCH care about, is justice for Caylee Marie Anthony.
My team and I will work as diligently as we always have to ensure she gets it and that her legacy is restored.
As long as you continue to publicly lie, omit, evade and demonstrate your overall inability to accept what has happened to your only grandchild at the hands of your daughter, you can expect a slot on my slide at every opportunity.
You knew on July 15. I could throw a rock from your roof to where Caylee laid in festering garbage. Shame on You.
You want out of the spotlight? Tell the truth. You might even try it before Dominick Casey cuts a deal and tells it for you.
Related Posts
Related Posts:
907 Comments
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
After just reading some apologetic self-serving, poor me drivel from Marinade Dave’s new blog defending George Anthony & ‘identifying’ with his predicament, it’s good to see you let them have it with both barrels! I think it’s how most of us feel & it’s not a witch hunt we are fed up with the lies & cover-ups!!
Blink
Thx for your explanation about why Lyons could be ready/willing to walk away from this mess. I agree she probably had no idea what the true story was when she agreed to be on the team.
I guess the only thing that bothers me is that if she is truly vehemently anti death penalty as a major personal conviction (not just interested from an academic/law perspective) it seems counter intuitive that she would leave a case, regardless if it would mean her first loss or not. IMO only
Blink, excellent, excellent, excellent!
George, George, George .. when will you even learn … you managed once again to rekindle the animosity that people have towards you and Cindy instead of getting sympathy for your predicament. Instead of leveling with the public and at the very least being truthful and unselfish, you carry on business as usual … arrogantly lying through your teeth !! What a tool!
Barb..Post#198….I find the Casey55 very scary…to me in my twisted mind…I think of how Casey could of used drugs with a built in TIMER of 55 minutes to drug poor little Caylee….something like…Lenesta…Ambien…Benadryl..so many drugs put a large adult out in that time.
MJ post 200, it’s a website called drugs.com where people can ask questions about different prescription medications on the forums. Casey55 posted many things about anti-depressants, zanax,and pain meds she actually had 133 posts from 2004-through 2007. I showed it to my husband too and he said she answered so many people on that forum, maybe this was someone just very knowledgeable and has nothing to do with Casey Anthony at all. It certainly may not be her at all, but it struck me when I saw “Casey55.” I did not read all the posts. Something just made me decide to let OSCO know and Kathi Belich, Blink too. Osco was closed,only for emergency calls it was late when I came across this so I emailed OSCO. It’s most likely someone else but you never know, they may want to look into it anyway to be certain.
Barb-
I have reviewed this, I do not think this is anything more than a coincidence, imo.
B
It is very interesting that with the Andrea Lyon’s interview there was no mention of Zenaida Gonzales…Now, again, no Zenaida with old Georgie’s letter..
Blink…Do you think Merideth from the Today Show, was told what questions she could not ask before Andrea came on TV? Is that how it really works? Is there any face to face actual non-pre recorded interviews today? Is are media..becoming a Government controlled voice?
No. You would be surprised how little prep interviewers do in the “pre”. She was appearing to promote her book.
B
Trivia– how much does a law office charge for photocopying per page (then multiply that by 10,000). Presumably the state also can charge the opposition for a nominal copying charge for discovery shared with them as private law offices would do. If say, 50 cents per page, (figure pulled out of the air as an example) this bill for the defense would be $5,000.00. Then the defense’s ‘cost’ at say half that, for a duplicate set to share with it’s team members. That could be 10 grand in photocopying. (not even to go into the TES records copying costs).
I’ve just read the psychologist’s review of Andrea Lyon’s Casey case comments on the Today Show, and if Lillian Glass is right, Lyon showed her weakness, she is not the pillar of strength she portrays nor did she have the confidence in speaking about the Casey case compared to her ability to project confidence when she spoke about her own new book.
The defense has lost the advantage of the ‘gladiator’ image of a terrible opposition, she showed her weakness and that can’t be regained now that we have seen it. And her confidence about Casey’s innocence?
And she even cuts herself down in a disparaging remark– that does not happen when you have confidence in yourself and your position.
Worth a read. (Blink Link in the article)
I am loving everyone’s post on this subject…
I have a question.
Where are the pictures that you are referring to of being stolen from evidence?
Thanks for all the hard work you do and thank your family also as I am sure they are sacrificing their time with you also…
Hugs…. my son may be home from Iraq within a week!
Lacilu, I so agree, about Marinade Dave’s drivel. I only made it a little ways down, but couldn’t stomach even trying to finish it!
Blink, Thank You so much for everything you do! You are so articulate and say what so many of us are thinking. You are my she-ro!
I had not read that until just now. I have found Marinade Dave to be a pretty fair guy overall, but he is definitely slanted to support of the Anthony’s. I do not begrudge anyone that. His post however insinuates heavily that the Anthony’s have not profited from the crime of their daughter and that is simply false. To give an example where he states that money did not go directly into their wallets, is simply disingenuous. Just because something might pass to a trust, or an attorney, or even a “charity” where in some way they decide the distribution of it , does not absolve their benefit of it.
Don’t even get me started on what I know about the money situation with these people. Let’s just say I cannot wait until this case is resolved, and a great deal of information comes to light, and see where everyone stands then.
I do however agree that people should N E V E R take to the public displays and attacks the Anthony’s have endured.
It is barbaric and imo, unlawful regardless of your opinion of the Anthony’s or anyone else for that matter.
I also think in general, coverage of this case, and blogs especially, should be judged individually on their own merit and every person reading and commenting should evaluate what is presented objectively. To say not to trust anything unless if comes from PIO Nieves, who has not given a presser or pressconf in a year, seems condescending to me, but I do not think he meant it that way. I mean, didn’t he personally track down the techbuy guy? I do not believe that information or interview was secured through OCSO.
That said, I stand behind every word in every article and comment I have ever made on this case; and every ounce of work my team and I have put forth in our efforts that has actually never appeared publicly.
Lastly, I think it is important to note that we can have a difference of opinion, and still respect one another’s work.
B
Dear George,
For the past year and a half, your “precious family” has dissected my thoughts and dreams. I can’t help but think you…. N O W ! w a n t m e r c y , f o r t h e s i n s y o u h a v e bestowed upon society.
What are you doing???? I don’t care about your feelings or family’s future. I’m living in the present and trying to come to terms with the fact that Caylee was murdered. I care about the 31 days your “family” neglected to follow-up and take inventory of her Caylees needs. That poor baby. She was a lost soul, without anyone to watch over her in her final hours. The fact alone that duck tape was placed over her nose and mouth makes me want to fall to my knees and cry. The old adage.. What you don’t know, can’t hurt you. George… you left for work and left Cindy to pick up the pieces. I believe because of your 10/yr law-enforcememt experience you choose not to bare witness of removing the evidence from the trunk of the car. Caylee’s life existence was wiped away without a seconds thought. See no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil. All gone… poof! But let’s pretend she’s not dead and see where this leads us… Lets, let our anger take the best of us because you know…were covering our tracks. I could go on and on and on… But you’re not worth it, cause you already know the truth, AND THE TRUTH HURTS, DON’T IT. What I do hope for, is that this does goes to trial. I’ve invested a lot emotionally on behalf of Caylee, no you. I’ve been spreading the word about this case to anyone that lends an ear. And ya know what? I hope Caylees photo is enlarged to larger-than-life poster size and placed among her peers who will, repeat will, seek justice and I believe will win. I don’t want a plea deal… I want want Caylee to give back what she endured.
I have just had an epiphany and feel more than slightly stupid – you know a moment where you make an absolute opinion and think how on earth did I not seeing that staring me right in the face before??
My choice was to be clinical in my approach by following lines of enquiry that weren’t popular – I didn’t think the Anthonys were more that just trying to protect thier daughter albeit it weird I thought they were being strong and doing what they had to to cope and keep moving forward in this awful tragedy ….
Anyhow my new opinion is one I can’t believe I am declaring – It doesn’t add up *duh* yes I knew none of it did and all the lies and weirdness of it all BUT I have examined it from so many angles that I have to say that I think Casey is covering for her family – I think her family were in on it – I think in the tone of some conversations with her parents is the answer – Cindy lowered her tone in what I can only think to describe as a “you know what I REALLY mean Casey” like a veiled threat kind of thing – I am rambling sorry but it is all just closing in – Georges comment about not being able to live a lie -I keep thinking that Casey taking sweet Caylee “away” from the house was a “punishment” for Cindy – I don’t think Casey killed Caylee but in the next breath I do – I switch like the wind – cause something just ain’t gelling- I think it was George and Casey in the house – I haven’t got past that – I tend to head in one direction and switch depending – I also keep thinking of that text to Anthony Lazzaro from Casey saying “If they never find her guess who spends eternity in jail? As a mother I would never ever think that …perhaps down the line I would come to accept it but I doubt it very very very very *infinity* much….I would refuse to think for a second she was not coming back… the very thought makes me ill as the mother to a beautiful astounding vibrant 4 and a half year old girl……
Motive makes no sense….this case is missing motive…opportunity and possible cause of death are available…yes motive could be revenge or maliciousness….BUT it doesn’t fit their MO – the Anthonys don’t do things without a plan for a reward it seems – I think there is money involved in this beyond money tha is debt – What are we missing team…it’s pretty big…there is a smoking gun – I just don’t think it is tangible – Perhaps the Anthonys don’t visit more because they have been advised that Casey could lose her temper and implicate them – I apologise that this is full of suppositions but as I consider this my sleuthing “home” all the way from little ole New Zealand I thought you would allow it this once.
Blink, to me you deserve high praise for this answer to George’s letter and audio interview! But it isn’t just the content of your post; it is the spirit and energy of your delivery. You were succinct, forceful, and factual with gusto! I sense that you are privy to more information and facts about the evidence than you are at liberty to divulge.
From the outset of Geroge’s reading of the letter to the answers he gave to the questions I kept thinking most people do not sympathize that you are under a microscope, George. You are right where you deserve to be. You and your immediate family are the architects of this monstrosity. Face the truth. And if you have faced it privately, for goodness sake go public with that and not this poor me rhetoric. Then and only then can you start some kind of healing process and then and only then will you garner sympathy from the realists among us.
TY
B
#199 Joe Schmo…excellent
diz39.. you think this is the first case she has taken knowing that her client is guilty? (and I dont believe for a minute she did not know the true story prior to taking the case) She is truly anti-death penalty, and such dedication to anything should be admired that is a fact, its too bad that shes not anti-defending-murderers-of-innocent-children-and-blaming-innocent-people. IMO of course.
MORNING TO ALL
nice piece blink. Let me say that i don’t hate the anthonys.They all exhibit classic inmate behavior to me….when i catch an inmate breaking the rules and confront them, they say “naw, wasnt me” even though i just saw them.Then they get their dawds or guys to come and lobby for them…”na it wasnt him…” well now you see all three of them are getting tickets or conduct reports for lying to staff. At the end of the day, i let the hearing committee decide what happens after that.
so you see, i neither hate or like the anthonys—they are nothing to me. why waste emotional energy for someone like that. i read here for clues so i can do my job better…and thats all they are to me. im not devaluing that a little person has been murdered …im saying lets not waste our emotions on them.they are not worth that IMO. Their world is so dillusional and i want no part of it. Their home was like squirrel poo—full of nuts.
also—does mama like to take baths with Caylee? or does the pool seem like a bath? maybe mama clothes were and (im sorry for being graphic) this was how little Caylee died… would that lend credence to a method of death?
also if i was gonna kill myself over grammar and spelling, i would have been dead long ago…LOL
Re: #205/Kleat — I agree totally, Lyon did show her weaknesses in this interview. However, I’m not so sure that she ever meant to hold herself out as a pillar of strength or a gladiator — I think those may be labels we applied to her based on her appearance and the fact that she is a strong woman.
Don’t know about the “genius” part, but she is an intelligent woman and I think she knows exactly what she is doing. In saying this, IMO she is not leaving this case or trying to get kicked off. Her passionate mission in life is to do away with the death penalty in all states, Florida still has the death penalty, and being on Casey’s case gives her the publicity she needs to accomplish this goal. In addition, it has given her the perfect platform and timing to promote her book, which also gives her the publicity to fight against the death penalty nationwide.
IMO there is little chance Casey will actually get the death penalty. Yes, Lyon is worried that this may be the first case she “loses”, aka the client gets life in prison instead of death penalty, but she’s willing to accept those odds. Even if this become her first “loss”, ultimately she wins in the form of publicity today and long into the future to further herself and her cause.
Oops — in my last post I meant to say “aka the client gets the death penalty instead of life in prison”. But I think you know what I meant.
when i think of george, i remember him telling the fbi about playing beer bong,or beer pong(i couldnt believe i was reading that,)immature,imo.i think it went to his head if he read here that we dont hate em,but on second thought…
when i was in my early teens ,my neighbor(about 21 years old) was accused ,and convicted of raping an eight year old girl,in the neighborhood of his nightclub employment,his mother proclaimed his innocence and publicly announced the hiring of private investigators who ,she said, would prove he wasnt the perp,he was at home asleep.it occurred between 7-8am.i walked past his families house every m-f morning at 7:00ish to catch the school bus at 7:15, i was stopped as i passed one morning by two detectives(pi or le???)who asked if i could identify as to whether or not his car was or was not there that morning,although i did know the difference in the cars that parked in his driveway and noticed at times weird parking or one car less or extra, for that particular morning i had no-zero recollection.he had been rumored to be a peeping tom around the neighhborhood,and had terrorized a couple of husbands who had caught him.someone somewhere always knows or sees something,these perps arent invisible as they think.
oops blink i meant that comment #220 for the morgan thread.
I have only gone to Marinade Dave’s site once or twice and went there yesterday. I wanted to say that he is definatly leaning towards the Anthony’s and seems to be supporting their behavior. I was very angry that he dared to mention your blog. YOU are an advocate for justice for Caylee Marie and others. He does not seem to see that.
OK, I’m moving on.
Unless I missed it, he was general in terms of “scathing diatribe”, and I do not think he ever mentioned any names. I understand there was some comotion with trolls, but to be honest, I tune that crap out, I will never have that here.
B
I just want to clarify something. I never stated that the Anthonys are not making a buck off images of Caylee. Specifically, I wrote that the money paid by GMA did not go to them. Blink, I will tell you who told me if you keep it between us and never divulge who it was. This was a recent revelation and Capt. Nieves had nothing to do with it. I think it is fair to say I stand behind what I write, too, and I do own a telephone. And a car, and my drives in Orlando are a lot shorter than most people writing about this case. I do not sit around making this stuff up. Did I make up the tech guy’s story, too?
Dave-
I never said you made anything up, or intimated same, in any way, nor would I. You said in your post (para) that people should not believe anything that does not come out of OCSO, and I referenced a piece you did, of your original work, so I am merely pointing out that you rely on your own resources as other writers do. I think you have been forthcoming about your open-ness to anyone in this case, and nobody should take offense to that, imo.
You and I respectfully disagree on some issues regarding this case, and I do not think that makes either of us right or wrong.
You defended Mr. Anthony based on your belief system, I wrote from mine.
I apologize but I do not understand the car/phone/driving reference at all, if you would be so kind to clarify, I would be happy to address.
Blink
#193 Respectfully Debi, the Mama doll is wearing clothes in that photo.
http://s439.photobucket.com/albums/qq120/cayleecross/?action=view¤t=Cayleecarseat1.jpg
If – when Cindy tracked down Casey after the 31 days, Casey didn’t lie about what happened but actually told her parents the truth (or at least her half-truth version of what happened to Caylee)- do you think they would have gone to the authorities or do you think they would have covered the whole incident up? Maybe to construct a more thought out, plausible reason for Caylee being no longer around?
Lee doesnt live under a microscope, gee, george and cindy, can you figure out the difference ? There is thousands of other people who`s child has murdered and they arent under a microscope, the difference is that you brought this all upon yourselves and have no one to blame for it except yourselves.
Yes, I am figuring a “loss” for Andrea Lyons means the client gets the death penalty. So for her, it will be a victory when Casey ONLY get LWOP. I agree, I do not think Casey will get the DP. But you never know. Isn’t LWOP tatamount to the Death Penalty? After all you are in prison till you die. LOL!
Compelling work Blink. All of it.
My first time here as a commenter.
So true…The A’s don’t get that this isn’t about them, and that they can’t control outcomes. Think they ever will? Sad lot.
You can bet your last bottom Granddollar that George knew without a doubt that Caylee wasn’t merely “missing” on July 15. How these people have conducted themselves since that day is deplorable.
I echo your sentiments on D. Casey. Talk Dominic, tell the world what you know, and shut these fools up.
Justice for Caylee Marie is WHAT this is about.
God bless you Blink.
Ty and welcome Redrelaxed.
B
212 Kiwi,
I have kicked that thought around in my head also because of the lies regarding June15th and 16th however, when Cindy called 911 she seemed genuine and when Casey was out on bail George came at her demanding to know what happened to his grandchild.I believe the motive was the fight that occured between Cindy and Casey on the 15th and IMO Cindy threatened to take Caylee away and possibly have Casey arrested for theft. I think when G&C realized that this was the catalyst , the cover-up began.
Steadychick, could well be, but up to and at trial, the defense has to posture it’s beliefs in the client and their position, and something has fallen apart here with that posture even before its time.
You are right, gladiator was not the right term, I wasn’t thinking of physical attributes of Ms. Lyon at all (just watched Gladiator last week again on the History Channel), I was thinking of her own lecture, her own words that portrays a defense attitude– being prepared for ‘ugly in whatever form it takes’ (et al other objectionable comments for the necessary evil of attitude preparation) in the courtroom and you don’t do that like a mouse with a cracking little squeek on national TV.
Glad you commented, because what we saw is what the psychologist saw and heard AND has the training and experience to recognize (and admittedly, she’s a self-promotor, but that doesn’t necessarily diminish her professional opinion if she’s done her homework vs her comments of early, on NG where she didn’t read, listen in prep).
What Dr. Glass did not discuss, and isn’t her role to discuss, was whether the behaviours, body language, voice cues, hesitations, etc, were done by this well seasoned trial lawyer, who has been known to pull out all the stops in trial to plead for her client’s life. She has shown weakness for some reason, maybe she has a weakness like anyone else, or maybe that’s what she wants people to see. Could Lyon have been caught off guard on Today, or did she plan to reveal this side, these clues to lack of conviction about her client’s innocence, and flippant remarks about not killing ‘her kid’?
If Baez had been in the Today interview soft chair instead, and he had showed these fumblings and body cues, there would be no question.
It is safe to assume that we can’t make this same assumption about Ms. Lyon. Blink has alluded to one of the possibilities and whether this turns out to be the reason or not, it may be unwise to take what happened at face value without thought to tactics. It’s opposite to the attitude of the leaked lecture, therefore begs the question why. Lecture leaked, we see one ‘face’ of defense, Today show airs, we see the opposite. If Blink’s suspicions prove to be true, then the lecture leak and the Today show were orchestrated for some purpose, as everything else the defense does with the media.
Blink, another great piece. It took me forever to get the video of George’s “Under The Microscope” interview to play in its entirety.
Having finally watched it, I must say, George can not have it both ways… He can not condemn the media in one breath and in the next seek them out in order to promote his ideas. He can not want people to leave him alone and at the same time want to work with families
(in high profile cases) that have been through a tragedy by attending childrens’ funerals or handing out Caylee Bears.
George seems to be angry an upset with his situation and with the way people sometimes treat his family. Although, that is understandable, to a certain degree, IMO he needs to take a step back and realize his daughter is the root cause of all of his problems.
I agree with you wholeheartedly Blink, when you wrote:
“As long as you continue to publicly lie, omit, evade and demonstrate your overall inability to accept what has happened to your only grandchild at the hands of your daughter, you can expect a slot on my slide at every opportunity.”
It is not only your slide they will be riding on Blink, but on the roller coaster of outrage all people feel when subjected to this family’s lies and inability to face the truth of what lead to little Caylee’s demise. Thanks again Blink for not allowing the Anthony’s to skew the truth in order to dupe the public into believing they and their beloved daughter are being wrongly persecuted in the media and elsewhere because of no fault of their own.
Ty Mom 3, I am so ready for someone to ask them the hard questions. I will say that this crime, in this state, has created a fishbowl we are not likely to see again. Poor Caylee.
B
(edit– “What Dr. Glass did not discuss, and isn’t her role to discuss, was whether the behaviours… were done by this well seasoned trial lawyer FOR A PURPOSE….” )
Orlandoan, I knew there were reasons this article hit home with me– thank you for expressing that so well!
kiwi-bird, last Wednesday WAS, in the Christian faith, Epiphany. We can only hope that George realized the significance of the meaning and he will allow the truth he holds deep and locked away, to light up his dark world.
Got it, thanks sista
B
Blink with an interest in not adding to the flames you may remove my post from above. It was for your eyes only in appreciation for your earlier words. Thanks, honey!
Did.
TY
B
Steadychick, I completely agree. Lyin’ does not seem to be holding up very well, does she? I’m thinking Blink could be right about her making an exit in the near future. I’m hoping she doesn’t just in case she is replaced by someone more skilled than she. Public opinion of her is low and I think that can only help the case, no? UNLESS it could be used as yet one more reason to call a mistrial.
Can anyone clarify for me? This is how I understand the system to work. In order for Casey to be declared Guilty all twelve jurors would have to be in agreement, right? But in order to get the Death Penalty in sentencing it would take a majority, is that right? TIA.
Thanks Blink re: my post, you are right, it is most likely just a coincidence, but I wasn’t completely sure that’s why I posted it. Thanks for your input and for taking a look at the website.
I along with others have followed this case from the very beginning starting with the day Caylee’s face was shown on every new station. I along with others have studied the facts, the theories, interviews, countless documents and forensic evidence. Casey Anthony is a woman who did the unthinkable and a woman who seems to believe that she is above any law, rule or punishment.
1: WHY WOULD CASEY ANTHONY WAIT THIRTY ONE DAYS TO REPORT HER DAUGHTER MISSING?
2: WHY WOULD CASEY ANTHONY TAKE LE ON A WILD GOOSE CHASE TO PLACES SHE DID NOT WORK, APARTMENTS THAT WERE VACANT, AND LIE ABOUT BEING EMPLOYED?
3: WHY WOULD CASEY ANTHONY ABANDON HER CAR LEAVING A PURSE AND CAYLEES CAR SEAT WITH THE DOORS UNLOCKED?
4: WHY WOULD CASEY ANTHONY GIVE TWO DIFFERENT ACCOUNTS OF THE ACTUAL KIDNAPPING?
5: WHY WOULD CASEY ANTHONY REFUSE TOASSIST IN HELPING LOCATE CAYLEE?
6: WHY WOULD CASEY ANTHONY BE ON FACEBOOK TALKING TO VARIOUS MEN WHEN HER DAUGHTER WAS MISSING?
7:WHY WOULD CASEY ANTHONY CONTINUE ON FOR THIRTY ONE DAYS LUNCHING, PARTYING, WATCHING MOVIES AND TELL THE SAME LIE TO FRIENDS AND FAMILY?
8: HOW COULD CASEY ANTHONY LEAD A NORMAL LIFE DAY TO DAY IF SHE WAS SO WORRIED ABOUT HER DAUGHTERS SAFETY?
9: WHY WOULD CASEY ANTHONY TELL LIE AFTER LIE ABOUT HER PARENTS, DAUGHTER, FRIENDS, CAR SMELL AND SO ON?
10: WHY WOULD CASEY ANTHONY ONLY CRY WHEN IT WAS ABOUT HER AND NOT HER DAUGHTER?
11: WHY WOULD CASEY ANTHONY SIT IN JAIL FOR OVER A YEAR WITHOUT FIGHTING ANYONE AND EVERYONE IF SHE WAS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS CRIME?
12: WHY WOULD ITEMS FROM THE HOUSE BE WHAT CAYLEE WAS ULTIMATELY FOUND WRAPPED IN?
13: WHY WOULD CASEY ANTHONY NOT TELL HER CLOSEST FRIENDS THAT SHE CAN’T FIND HER DAUGHTER?
14: WHY WOULD CASEY ANTHONY NEED SEDATIVES AND WANT THE TAPE TO HER REACTION BLOCKED WHEN CAYLEES BODY WAS FOUND?
15: WHY WOULD CASEY ANTHONY HAVE DECOMPOSITION IN HER TRUNK?
AJ….for your post and #1…it was Cindy Anthony that reported Caylee missing not Casey.
Sorry for any confusion, Blink, and I will try to clarify what I meant. I wrote:
“When I wrote a post titled I CALLED THE COPS!, I took with me one very important bit of advice from Captain Angelo Nieves, head of OCSO Media Relations. He told me explicitly that if it did not come from his office, do not believe it. I took that as meaning that, although not claiming that any of the information on blogs and forums are out and out lies, misdirections or distortions of the truth, none of us should automatically believe what we see and hear, including (and especially) what we are told from any of the media outlets. Unfortunately, people have a tendency to pick and choose what they want to formulate and believe and I think a lot of them will be very surprised come trial time. Yes, I am basing that on what I’ve heard from extremely reliable sources and what my opinion is on the subject.”
Exactly what I wrote was exactly what Nieves told me, and my opinion is that you cannot trust everything you read and hear. It has nothing to do with very credible sites like yours and Valhall’s, but it does have plenty to do with how people, particularly commentors and the general public, rewrite factual information based on hearsay. For instance, a person came to my blog the other night in response to something I wrote and she stated as fact that the CBS show 48 Hours Mystery specifically mentioned the name of the little girl who Cindy babysat and it was, most definitely, Holly Gagne’s daughter. My source, which is a heck of a lot closer than hers, told me it wasn’t, but my problem was more about twisting the truth and people believing what they want to believe. Quite obviously, no credible network is going to name a child, let alone show her face. Now, where did that commentor get her information? Did she read it on a blog or forum? Another commentor? I have no idea, but my source is from the Orlando area and so am I and that is all I will say about this person. This is not to take away from someone outside of the area, either, but it does offer me more leeway to snoop sometimes because I can drive to a location like the tech guy and that particular Walmart (where I shop occasionally) to investigate and/or interact face-to-face with people. It’s what I meant by car and driving. It’s easy for me and I’m not afraid to do it. As for the phone reference, sure, anyone can pick up the phone. You certainly do and my point was and is that I do, too, and I have never been afraid to use it. In no manner was it a challenge to you, I assure you.
As for the GMA money, I do stand by what I was told. It was not Nieves and my offer to you is still open, as long as it remains between us.
I hope this helps explain things. I did not have you in mind at all when I wrote my thoughts about what Nieves told me months ago. This was for people to not believe everything they see and hear. We all should realize the media sensationalize stories for ratings, and people have a tendency to harbor secret “National Enquirer” thoughts and desires. You, Blink, are far, far from that.
Again, sorry for any confusion. That was not my intent. I hope this clears it up.
Dave
Dave, my sincere thanks, and yes, this has clarified your thoughts for me and hopefully our readers.
I could not agree more in the danger of folks believing everything they read, and they should be especially discerning when approaching the areas of the web that will allow anyone, to say anything, in anonymity.
I will never visit blogs or sleuthsites that allow that. It reminds me of the check out line.
I gaulk for a second, and pass on by, I recommend it highly to all
Fondly,
Blink
Re: Post # 206…Blink, thank you, you have restored my faith for the media.<3 <3 <3
Blink..you seem to know more than anyone…
1.Did Caylee have a PCP?
2.Has her PCP come forward with any medical records?
3.Did Cindy carry both Casey and Caylee under her medical insurance from her employer?
4. Why do people not see the Mona Lisa smile on Caylee as clear and cut…TRAUMA?
#108 – Thank you.
Funny thing JoJo, In the end that is exactly where I ended up UNDER A MICROSCOPE…..LITERALLY in the Coroner’s office……..UNDER A MICROSCOPE!
You said it well.
I watched the Larry King interview with the Anthonys that was aired on May 13 2009 and find it to be very telling. The hard questions that Larry asked is territory that they do not want to enter. The diary subject(june 21 entry by Casey) is very disturbing to Cindy, especially when her lawyer tells Larry that they will turn it over for expert testing whenever asked for it. I would like to know if as she says, that was an old entry made in 2003, then why the bothered look on her face as they go to break. She looks as if she wants to slap her lawyer, as if he is her client and he better shut up. The other question was about them visiting her in jail. If your daughter is innocent, then visiting her should be easy. It should be a nice visit. Their excuse for everything is always, always the media and it is time they stop and come to a realization with reality. That question makes them look very uncomfortable and IMO they help their daughter to look more and more guilty every single time either of them speak. Turn the volume off and watch it. George is so uncomfortable. To me their body lauguage says it all.
Blink – Wonderful reply to George’s letter. You are “Simply the Best!” http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xHm-rXe2n2Y
TY friend
B
RE: ‘Mama’
(I’ve said before, just a thought, that ‘Mama’ the doll was maybe representative of Caylee’s ‘mother’, and that Casey would become the referenced ‘nanny’. )
Here is an interesting reference in George’s state deposition on Page 135, that always before, indicated a jealousy issue. But reading this, and ‘construuuuing’ it as Casey might have with little references and meanings, ‘mama’ could be the doll and ‘mama Cindy’. Casey could be playing dollies herself, as she moves Cindy into the ‘mama’ position with the dollie, and Casey moves herself into a little dollie position too, the Dora dollie, as the ‘nanny’ persona. Zanny can be the little rhyme Casey perhaps learned about from Double Trouble at a younger age, and adapting it with the ‘adult’ game of Zanex use, maybe even a babysitting role for the chemical.
“BY MR. ASHTON:
Q: Okay. Do you recall an incident maybe when…Caylee was an infant that has been relayed to us by other family members where your wife said something to Caylee…like: Come to mama? In other words, when she was first there, a slip of the tongue, and said: Come to mama and then– Cindy…picked her up?
A: I never heard that.
Q: That–
A: I never heard Cindy as being considered–
Q: Okay.
A: — Caylee’s mother or come to mama. I never heard that.
Q: And you never heard anybody mention that during an argument or something like that about any of that?
A: No.”
(was Cindy ‘mama’ in Casey’s mind through jealousy or whatever, and did this relate to the reference of ‘mama’ somehow? By Casey, or maybe by Cindy, saying she was talking about the ‘mama’ doll, Caylee come to ‘mama’ to explain the misunderstanding.)
Just the Anthonys blowing hot air again trying to make or steal or what ever to make more blood money
In reference to Mr. Dave’s post #240: I have read at your blog several times. In reference to your comment “because I can drive to a location like the tech guy and that particularly Wal-Mart – A poster by the name of Julie posted a YouTube video that “particular” Wal-Mart in regards to whether the doors were automatic or had to be pulled open manually. You thanked Julie because you stated you did not know, but because of Julie’s investigation and the post of the YouTube video we all knew what kind of doors were at that Wal-Mart. Your investigation of those doors was by a poster and not an actual physical investigation by yourself of that “particular Wal-Mart.”
C.J.
I have no clue what your referring to, and if you have a beef with Dave, go to his site and address it respectfully please.
TY
B
Also in regards to Mr. Dave’s #240 post – It is of my opinion that majority of bloggers that have followed this case from day #1 have read all of the discovery that has been released to date and thus they are not relying on any media outlets. If anything, the media outlets are getting their information from the internet instead of vice versa. For me, I have followed this case from day #1, and the Anthonys are profiting and living off their dead grandchild.
We agree for the most part. I plan on doing an expose when the case is concluded. It is A M A Z I N G.
B