Caylee/Casey Anthony Case: Indulgent Definately, Indigent Hardly
Disclaimer–
Orlando, FL-
HOT MESS SPOILER ALERT
Who thought this was a good idea on behalf of THE BAEZ LAW FIRM?
Who raised their hand at the weekly status update and said:
“I’m sick of this crapp-ass coffee, I make $300 bucks an hour.
I make big bucks so I should be drinking STARbucks.
Gimme a Venti. I can’t drink this swill another 3/4 hour minimum or I will surely die before the trial.
I KNOW.. how about we figure out a way to make OTHERS pay for it??
Sound ridiculous?
That is nothing compared to the caught-on-camera cluster that took place during yesterdays hearing to declare accused murderer Casey Anthony indigent for costs.
Andrea Lyon, lead counsel and chronic look-of-woehaver, feels approximately $70Geeze of her “charity’s” money has been spent on this case. (Edited to add, methinks she is subtracting $22Geeze, read on)
The Center For Justice In Capital Cases
SHUT THE DOOR. This is no charity, except perhaps to Lyon as she is a paid staff member, serving as it’s director.
It is a certification study class at DePaul, run by Lyon and paid by the defense PI Morty.
Furthermore, as the work product developed in this case supports the curriculum and subsequent GPA of it’s tuitionable students, why the hell would the expenses be allocated to the defense of the case against Casey Anthony instead of DePaul?
There is no charity attributable to Andrea Lyon although she testifies to fund raising efforts through various charities and corporations, and that those charities are now, “in the hole.” $70Geeze, to be exact.
Is this the part where we here her use of the word charity was a charitable way to say she imposed on her budget as a professor?
I will say, given her penchant for hardass reporting from her students, how is it possible she has no clue what her books and billable hour are?
There are 14 students working on a death penalty case that are not attorneys, and client attorney privilege would not extend to them as their is no established agency. If I were the National Enquirer I would be finding out which of those undergrads have fat student loans and what kind of access to information they have. Catch My drift?
SanDiego Sugga Daddy
Todd Macaluso, apparently so sure of Casey’s innocence he gassed up the whirlybird, packed his lucky smoking jacket and signed on to the case.
Jose Baez testified that Todd Macaluso gifted $70 Geeze to the trust account of Casey Anthony. Operating pro hac vice (visitors pass) as representation with his own retainer agreement with Miss Anthony, Mac has violated the rules of the Florida Bar:
RULE 4-1.8 CONFLICT OF INTEREST; PROHIBITED AND OTHER TRANSACTIONS
(e) Financial Assistance to Client. A lawyer shall not provide financial assistance to a client in connection with pending or contemplated litigation, except that:
(1) a lawyer may advance court costs and expenses of litigation, the repayment of which may be contingent on the outcome of the matter; and
(2) a lawyer representing an indigent client may pay court costs and expenses of litigation on behalf of the client.
As Casey had access to $275K and was not indigent 10 months ago when Todd Macaluso signed on and paid his apparent entry fee, it would be impossible to defend this “contribution” as legal under Florida law.
ABC
The Approving Bogs for Children company has paid out $200 Geeze.
“In August 2008, we licensed exclusive rights to an extensive library of photos and home videos for use by our broadcast platforms, affiliates and international partners. No use of the material was tied to any interview.”
..”The deal was done with an attorney representing several owners of copyrighted content, ABC News spokeswoman Cathie Levine said. That attorney is Baez, she added..”
Really, not tied to any interview? When did those images and videos debut on GMA exactly? Who was on that program when they were shown?
I am quite certain I heard Jose Baez say in sworn testimony that he retained Tim Chinaris, former head of Florida Bar ethical committee to field such inquiries and all were turned down. He added that such agreements would not be ethical. Maybe he thinks ethical is transposable with visible.
Several owners of content means multiple people were paid for this “extensive library”. If ABC is claiming that Baez brokered this transaction for all then we have an even bigger problem as he was simultaneously representing the interests of all parties at the time. The agreement that was reached between the parties is critical to understanding the income status of Casey Anthony and her attorneys. Judge Strickland may very well just deny the indigency application and alls well that ends well that these barristers will have to buck up on their own.
That is, until John Morgan gets wind. We will see a copy of the ABC contract in the civil case against Casey Anthony on behalf of Zenaida Gonzalez, fo shcizz. He danced 2 jigs yesterday. There were witnesses.
Without question, Mr. Baez should be REQUIRED to produce this agreement in response to proof their is no recurring revenue or subsequent earnings to his client based on the structure of the agreement. It is not uncommon for such agreements to include royalty clauses, which would mean that someone is getting paid every time a photo or image from that collection is used.
ABC newsroom laid off 1/3 of it’s news staff earlier this month. Nice.
Billable Hours
Perhaps the *thud* moment for me yesterday was when Mr. Baez admitted in open court that he does not track his billable hours on this case.
THUD, AGAIN
Apparently, the reaction is sticking with me.
Under the rules of the Florida Bar, there is a very stringent set of requirements when determining reasonable fees for clients.
Short Version:
RULE 4-1.5 FEES AND COSTS FOR LEGAL SERVICES
(b) Factors to Be Considered in Determining Reasonable Fees and Costs.
(1) Factors to be considered as guides in determining a reasonable fee include:
(A) the time and labor required, the novelty, complexity, and difficulty of the questions involved, and the skill requisite to perform the legal service properly.
How can you bill someone $90Geeze, and have no idea how you got there, or whether or not such activities are reasonable to the client and or case?
Judge Strickland ruled that by end of business today the defense team needed to provide a full accounting of requested trust account disbursements.
I am thinking they will take the rejection of her indigency status before another trip to the dunk tank, but that’s just me.
Can you imagine the car ride home with Cheney Mason?
Role play:
“You effing stupid carpetbagging imp..
Do you even know what the eff IN CAMERA means??
It does not mean that information is sealed forever like the shalac on your hair, you moron..”
AL: Yep, I already told him that. Can I offer you some starbucks?
Related Posts
Related Posts:
260 Comments
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
Wow Blink…your amazing. Did I say you are amazing?
Hey…can I send this article to da Judge?
Lol, he reads here, but sure!
B
T H U D ! ! !
Blink and Company,
That was my very own personal thud of my forehead hitting my desk. How DO you guys keep this all straight? I said on another thread, on which, I can be a blubbering mess, power to the people. Well, what I should say is,
POWER TO THE BOC!
You all give the definition of transparency, a new meaning. Keep up the good word. I am sure that little girl is looking down and thanking you. Caylee’s justice matters too!
this group just proves that the most expensive education does not, nor will it ever, buy common sense….what a F’in circus…
THANK YOU! I was screaming* SCREAMING* about this ABC thing at HM. The FL bar and JAC should review the contract: the parties, any brokerage fees accounts payable and future pay outs to WHOMEVER with that transaction between ABC and Baez.
And why wasn’t the Mac donation and DePaul donation included in the motion for indigent status? It only came out on direct. And who is this donor that is allowed to remain anonymous?
Okay, I have to get work done, but thanks again.
Hold the phone!! I’m just through the Chapter Toddy, and what??? No suggestion that this money was for his services as drycleaner and laundry-mat??? We know he’s reported to have taken clients to the cleaner, but has he also run a successful California Cleaners for the well-known early California connections to media payouts? Couldn’t he have been a facilitator-cleanerator? Taking present payments on behalf of a future client for deals that would come to fruition in the future when innocent clients walk?
70 grand is such an odd figure too, 50 grand plus 20 for Todd’s own expenses, gas and booze and cleaning of the velvet smoking jacket per trip to Florida. Whatever the breakdown, isn’t it just possible that this 70 grand was taken into the accounts of Macaluso from a source, say…. those California based media sources courting Baez, and did it go through the Miracle Wash patent pending process of the Macs Law firm?
Blink, have you got a video clip of that section of the courtroom dynamics where we see Judge Strickland’s very visual ‘wheels churning’?? And he has an ‘Aha… nod nod’ moment to himself?
Blink….best case scenario. Lets say the SA or Judge Strickland reviews everything said yesterday and finds out Baez lied, will Judge Stricklan automatically say no to the indigency? But then if he did will that open the door for Casey to get a retrial?
This couldn’t be any more bizarre if were PLANNED for T.V.
Sex, lies, videotape….and money.
For the love of all that is Holy – I pray for an end to the comedic NIGHTMARE!
Teri says:
March 19, 2010 at 11:56 am
This couldn’t be any more bizarre if were PLANNED for T.V.
____________________________________________________________
But, was it? I mean, how WAS this nightmare of a peepshow born? I just don’t get it. There is a high-school dropoff who is clearly a pathological liar, her classless middle-income-at-best family, and a dead toddler. We’re not talking OJ here . . . no previous fame, no money, no charm, nothing.
I’m wondering if the ‘note passing’ in jail… err… Judge Strickland’s courtroom, was written on the paper Casey had in front of her, was it a note from her via pipeline officer to her parents and did it dead-end with the officer before being returned back to Andrea conveniently as she picked up her bag over by his chair?
Which was it, note passed from someone in the gallery to the officer to Lyon to Casey’s lap (put on the table first for camera view, then returned to it’s hidden place on her lap), OR was the note from Casey through others to the Officer, who would have read it, maybe opened the paper for parents to look over his shoulder, then returned via the same pipeline?
Is this note passing ok with Judge Strickland in HIS courtroom, when gum-chewing is not? What about spit-balls????
Blink, great reporting, as usual.
Am I understanding correctly there is NO charity per se as Lyon alluded to in court? Is the $70K just part of the university budget for the certification class? Sorry to ask a gazillion questions, but what is/was Morty’s involvement?
Someone, Blink or Blinksters, PLEASE tell me all of the above is not “going to be swept under some rug” either because of some loophole in the law (re TM, for instance) or because it may be unethical but not illegal (so so sick of hearing that one).
If Strickland plans on ruling on this SHORTLY, after receiving Baez’s detailed list of expenditures and support for such, then that tells me that a thorough review will probably not be done.
P.S. BTW, the ONLY book I will ever purchase about Caylee’s death and her murdering mutha will have to be penned by Yuri, John Allen (probably won’t happen) or Blink and team…..cause you know it’s gonna happen. (can you tell I’m STILL pizzed from yesterday? LOL)
I think Casey should get indigent status. There probably is NO money.
But the state should seriously consider any back door payments, ie. If something was promised in the future to the Anthonys that (wink wink nudge nudge) helps Baez later, or he receives brokers fees for it. Plus, he didn’t explain what he has done with funds thus far. A Lyon did a lot more work for less. If nothing else, the state might want to recoup costs from Baez if he can’t legitimately document how those funds were spent.
There is a fat host of liabilities and conflicts swirling that will give this girl another “up at bat”.
That is my issue. No reason to plea really, and this money train keeps chugging.
B
This is the second time that I have seen this note passing happen.
Lets all use Baez and Lyons answers to the questions on our IRS tax forms and see if we land in jail faster than you can say Casey Anthony! Income? well its about..(insert random figure instead of W-2)expenses? insert an approximation . Or better yet next time you need a car loan or a mortgage tell your loan officer (stumbling of course) those same answers and you will find yourself out on the street lickety split. But Baez and Co. thought that was supposed to suffice? Fla. taxpayers who are going to foot the bill for this should be outraged.
Blink this article puts the blink in sink! I hope that the crew of the Good Ship Caylee Marie are prepared to go down with the ship. The whole lot of them have used and abused the system to profit from the murder of a little girl. Til yesterday they have not been called into account for any of their actions and if they aren’t censured it gives the nod for future criminals (including unethical attys) to use their victim to pay for their defense.
It’s interesting that folks are outraged that the alleged mistress of GA might be selling her story but both GA & CA have sold their souls to the media over and over. It’s time for this idiotic charade to come to an end. Caylee’s homicide has become nothing more than money making scheme and that violates both secular and moral law.
The piranhas are waiting for the rats to jump ship…splash!
Puts the blink in sink, I LOVE IT.
B
Anyone else find it a tad odd, that nowhere in the 275 thousand dollars, was a single penny from George, from Cindy? Both of whom shared in the family photos, their images used time and time again in the media, ABC, NBC, CBS, Larry King, etc, all used supplemental visuals.
Not a penny of the 20 grand from the CBS 48 HRS show went to Casey’s defense when it IS Casey’s story, afterall, she created it, she lied and behaved in ways that fed what was to come through media interest. The family worked so hard to hype the story to get the type of media command of the situation, they drove the media demands by continual feeding new antics and rages and protests.
Not a penny of 20 grand went to help Casey in her defense costs– not according to the accounting we heard yesterday. Why didn’t the whole 20 grand, less costs of Brad Conway to broker the NYC deal, go to the defense?
I wished Mr. George had not rapid fired the bail question follow up, Baez was about to answer it, lol.
B
Kleat 11:55 am
Great post and tutorial on how to clean money Bozo made from brokering a deal with ABC. Keep it coming!
hahahaha! Brilliant post. LMO! Luvit
Casey isnt famous her daughter Caylee is the only reason the public became interested in this sad case. I find it stupefying that Lyons and Cheney Mason are so morally outraged at the Death penalty. Casey enacted the ultimate death penalty on her own daughter but that’s ok I suppose. Please remember Caylee. Casey isn’t the victim here despite Colonel Cheney Mason’s blustering outrage.
Baez planned to not be transparent yesterday by his ill-preparedness. I’d love to have seen him in front of Judge Judy when he pulled that ‘I didn’t know I had to bring my records for this hearing about the money’ gag.
Cheney was very insulting to the prosecution and the public in his court TV interview. He used the word stupid and the words not intelligent many times regarding both. His old school lawyerin’ is going to backfire bigtime as is his disrespect for victim. Insulting while begging for alms isnt a very good game plan!
hey friend, it’s just speculation, but it’s just so danged convenient, Todd being out there in the big Hollywood state and him jumping into the media right away on his famous lawyers radio broadcast of one year ago. Either that, or he was paying Casey for the opportunity to help, like his name was John.
Blink, you are an excellent writer, with a grasp of the situation and a great sense of humor.
Whatever money Casey/Baez/Anthonys received would be taxable. Since Casey is not a non-taxable charitable foundation, nor could she be, she has to pay taxes on the windfall. If she deducts Baez’s nestegg as expenses she has no foundation or business to claim expense deductions. I don’t believe you can exempt money from taxes that you pay to an attorney defending you in a first degree murder case. Further since Casey is not a foundation as outlined above nor is she Macaluso’s spouse , Macaluso would, I believe, have to pay a gift tax on that $70,000 he gave her. Baez has to pay income taxes on it, but he can deduct his office expenses. George and Cindy have to pay taxes on whatever they’ve received, as well as market value for their trips, hotel rooms, meals, limos, etc. Now it could be that the money from ABC could have been paid to their “Foundation” but I think part of this money and activity started long before they set up their sham foundation.
I can’t figure out where the $70,000 from Lyon fits in, but it would probably be taxable to Casey too.
I am not a tax attorney nor an accountant, and the above is IMO, but I believe I am correct.
Thank you and you are correct.
These transactions must match, period.
B
Blink, whatcha bet Mr. George knew the answer to that question!
Say, didn’t Casey tell someone that maybe she could sign photos of herself or sell her autographs to make money for her defense? Could that have been part of her letter writing plan, brokering some media money through her ’50 Letters’? Why would anyone keep those letters and not immediately destroy them, if there wasn’t a pay out planned down the line– by someone.
Financial records? Uh, duh you mean like written down, on paper, that you can read?? Uh, well, frankly judge that would take a little time to prepare (manufacture) and sniff sniff, did you make the prosecution show their’s? I’m sure those thoughts were circling in the JB toilet bowl mind yesterday.
Blink, I didn’t say great article yet, did I!!! Do you think Cheney will trick Judge Strickland into recusing himself from the case? Does the defense still have interest in a new judge (they did early on).
They would not dare.
B
…. chugging and adding cars…. the longer Casey sits, the more ‘non-promises’ can be adding on… it really doesn’t matter if there’s any promise to pay or promise of deals or not, build it, get her off, and they will come knocking at your door down the line.
In all reality the time that kc spent in JB’s office could yield a lot of moolah yet. Being the clever entrepreneur that he is, JB could have had her writing her story, posing for provocative pictures , signing 8×10 glamour shots, who knows what he will pull out after this is over, but she sho did something for all those hours and I don’t think whatever it is Jose has cashed in on it yet.
Bravo, Blink!!! Go get ‘em. I can’t write what I really want to say, so I won’t.
When I get this upset at the unfairness of all that is this case, I just think of Caylee and know that God took her home to save her from the insanity. Caylee is happy and playing with all the other cherubs in heaven. She is safe at last.
Keep fighting the good fight.
Kleat, yep the chugging continues, non promises are hanging in the air like clouds. That’s the infuriating thing, from the getgo, this was never about Caylee or casey. It was about the get rich mentality that began with a lousy lawyer who has an ego that is that same size as kc’s. He doesn’t have any morals and it’s obvious that she doesn’t, I’m pretty sure that killing your baby and skipping into a new life proves that.
I think the same clouds hang over the A’s. Why else would Conway provide services without pay, the same goes for DC, pretty sure he thought that eventually he’d share in some bucks.
Judge Strickland was impressive yesterday! Cheney Gang came in yukking it up for the cameras, all smiles with that whiff of arrogance and a splash of intimidation. Cheney immediately set out to run roughshod over the proceedings. Strickland never gave up the reins or responded with anything but cool composure and in the end Cheney looked like a schoolyard bully exposed.
#
westsidehudson says:
March 19, 2010 at 12:18 pm
I think Casey should get indigent status. There probably is NO money.
But the state should seriously consider any back door payments, ie. If something was promised in the future to the Anthonys that (wink wink nudge nudge) helps Baez later, or he receives brokers fees for it. Plus, he didn’t explain what he has done with funds thus far. A Lyon did a lot more work for less. If nothing else, the state might want to recoup costs from Baez if he can’t legitimately document how those funds were spent.
There is a fat host of liabilities and conflicts swirling that will give this girl another “up at bat”.
That is my issue. No reason to plea really, and this money train keeps chugging.
B
But it is a “PAY ME NOW OR PAY ME LATER” situation. If she is denied indigent status, what then? If the lawyer now in place can’t cover expenses, and does less to represent her then you have an immediate appeal. She will get indigent status, but the game should be up with whoever is playing with the money. And if there is anything hidden, it should be investigated and given to tax payers. If it was squandered and unaccounted for by her lead attorney, then the state should seize his assets until the amount is put toward the cost of this trial.
Ultimately, I do believe that will be the case. She is indigent now, yes. The money issues wrt to the lawyers are for the bar to pick up on.
B
i think all of those hours spent in JB’s office was CA “logging” billable hours herself…trading labor, if you will….
Oooo… I think JB better brush up on his bikini selling skills. Great post Blink!
Did you miss the part where he said he is working “pro-bono” he is not asking for state money, there is nothing to calculate if he choses to work for free.
Apparently the piece was lost on you. No State funds will ever pay for a private attorney.
B
Blink ~ I needed that laugh from your article today. Too Funny.
Reading about MH yesterday put me in a sad state. Seriously though, JB has his head up his a**. How in the world can you represent a client and not keep track of the hours you spend on the case? Besides it being against the law…it’s moronic. So he’s taking on this case pro bono too? Or is he just planning to tell Strickland – “I basically eat, sleep and breathe this case so I haven’t been keeping track of my hours because ya know, like it’s the only thing I work on…” DING DONG!!! I cannot believe the odacity the defense has to go to court without records of what has been billed, what has been paid, blah blah blah…they think they are above the law. So slimy it’s beyond comprehension. Stickland is going to want some serious explaing done. JB might be in a butt load of trouble.
Blink….Wish I could fax to them but they won’t give me the fax #. I told them I wouldn’t tell anyone. On it’s way to 425 N Orange Ave!! Wonder if Macapoopoo would Whirlybird it there? I’m off to look for a fax # for him.
Oh, Blink, you are so gifted!!!!!!!!! I am glad that our Judge Strickland reads here. Because it is all written down line for line how everything and I mean Everything has gone down because of you. No need for a jury just send Casey on where she belongs—preferably in H***.
Kleat, Spitball rules love that!!! Maybe that is what Lyons was looking at on the ceiling.
The defense’s recess and coming back with that moronic School play was so laughable. I can hear them now, Andrea, you stand to my right and get “sworn” in like we know what were doing. and I’ll insult the ugly judge and prosecution for you. Baez, just “zip it”, no not your PANTS—–
That was a laughable cluster F***. With the talking to himself George and dowdy penniless Cindy in her sweater set she has had for twenty years because she cant buy new clothes look in the side ring of the circus.
Friend, I am sick of hearing unethical but not illegal too. Andrea must teach a class in that—maybe has taught a private one to all the defense team. As far as I am concerned the new guy is just a pretend “ah shucks” southern gentleman bullshitter.
That was apparent from about the first ten seconds to anyone that lives in Texas. That is a class act “RENOWNED” attorney? “RENOWNED must mean rude A**. But what do I know, I am just one of those stupid possible jury selections.
Well then. Foghorn Leghorn says he’s gonna walk out the door with his pretty little Ms. Casey arm-in-arm when the trial is over. And I will be “lol”ing my azzzzzz off cause the IRS will be waiting and relieve Mr. Leghorn of his burden (and cart her right back to booking). Boys and Girls, can we say “Tax evasion”???????
lol at Foghorn Leghorn
B
How in the hell is JB going to be able to come back to the Judge by close of business today with all the documentation he needs? If he didn’t keep a record of his billable hours since July of ’08, what makes anyone think he’s going to have even a semblance of good record-keeping for the financial transactions that have occurred. If he doesn’t give the Judge what he wants today, will there be another motion to delay so the defense team can get their chit together in a meaningful way?
Just thinking about how much it would cost to depose everybody they mentioned in court yesterday. OMG! That will take months and months and lots of $$$$.
As stupid as JB appears in court, that’s how obnoxious I think Cheney Mason is. I am not looking forward to watching him in action in the future.
blink,
Is this for all three court cases?
Blink, re: the recuse issue, one commentator (I won’t say who, got it off a search and comments on commentator’s blog showed up) said that when Mason said to Judge Strickland ‘Trust me’, and if Judge Strickland had agreed to just trust the defense attorney on the financials, that this would open the door for the judge to have to recuse himself.
I’m not naming the commentator, you’ll understand. But interesting point, this commentator didn’t mention the past issues of the defense trying to get rid of Judge Strickland and to get rid of the whole prosecution team too.
KUDOS, BLINK! THE MSM (so-called mainstream media) seems more focused on the salacious aspects of the Ants et al .. and NOT on the misuse of PUBLIC FUNDS. ANYBODY at FL State TAX auditors paying ATTENTION? The Ants, Baez & co. PLUS Casey are all making a fortune AT PUBLIC EXPENSE.
#1) WHAT ABOUT THOSE LYON STUDENTS? Does that university NOT GET FEDERAL and STATE funds (from the public)? Besides the students’ OWN TUITION MONIES … taxpayers kick in monumental amounts to support their educations. Lyon is PAID BY TAXPAYERS (in essence) TO TEACH. HER “EXPENSES” SHOULD BE DEDUCTED FROM HER INCOME TAX. (NOT paid by JAC or other taxpayer sources), The NOTORIETY every lawyer (knuckle-dragging though they are) means COUNTLESS THOUSANDS in FREE ADVERTISING. Think Todd-O made a contribution OUT OF THE GOODNESS OF HIS HEART? Hardly. He likely picked up a hundred or so FELONS eager to get the services of such a bottom-dwelling “mouthpiece.” Lyon AND her school are getting COUNTLESS NEW STUDENTS off the publicity as well.
#2) WHY aren’t ALL the “sweetheart deals” the Ants AND Casey, Baez et al BEING RELEASED? There is no right of privacy when PUBLIC FUNDS are involved. The Ants are all living “the high life” on the NOTORIETY their daughter’s crimes permitted.
#3) Casey Anthony’s ENTIRE EXISTENCE since her arrest in 2008 has been at TAXPAYER’S EXPENSE. The length of time it’s taking to allow all the legal shenanigans MOST DEFENDANTS NEVER GET … Add to that, the millions it cost the State to search for Caylee, determine the cause and effect of her murder … and bring this case to trial … we’ve got to be talking FIVE ( 10 ? ) MILLION DOLLARS — or more, all told until the day they stick a needle in her arm. And the new attorney Mason talks about “walking out arm in arm w/Casey when she’s ACQUITTED?” IS HE INSANE as well as belligerent and boastful? Anyone NEAR Casey Anthony if she’s acquitted will be DODGING BULLETS! If she’s acquitted, her life won’t be worth a plug nickel. (Will taxpayers have to SUPPORT her police protection the rest of her days on earth?_
hehehehehe….I LOVE IT!!!
Isnt it amazing how some of our earier predictions are now playing out? Some of us had the scams figured out from the beginning. The flies are all being caught in their own trap.
It is absolutely coming full circle and it it freezing my shorts at the entitlement of some people.
B
Blink, Morgan may have done two jigs, but Cheney did too, but spells it GIG!! Enjoy!!
http://sendables.jibjab.com/view/cZfwEsedXVRnUx4d
Blink, all of this makes the defense look like a clown act, I agree. Unethical to the first degree, but are Casey’s chances of being found not guilty looking better and better for her? OR…does this just imply she’ll probably get LWOP. I’ll take that anyday!!!!
#4WSH
I could be way way off, but the donation for $5000 seems obvious. I GUESSING it’s George’s contribution. That’s the amount he got from ‘River’ during their affair. And the Anthony’s are ALWAYS anonymous.
clapping my hands while bouncing up and down in my chair, I truly hope Mr. Morgan has started to file his motion, would love to see his client gets of this piece pie, is there a chance she will?
Bravo Blink!
In addition to what you were saying about Mac: since has also been accused of his own financial misdeeds, the 70k he “donated” might not have even been his to donate in the first place.
Could you please explain how Baez gets away with “oh I forgot to bring that piece of paper to court”– or whatever. It seems like the judge could at least fine him or something to get his attention.
Someone should hint hint send this article to Kathi belich and the national enquirer!!
This is good stuff
they need to be xposed and dethroned
the only thrown they should be left with
is the porcelin king
cuz when chit hits the fan they will be spending lots of time there!!! Well stocked with toilet paper and a copy of the NE and blinks research!!
You go blink
Judge Grants Casey Anthony’s Indigent Status
A judge ruled Friday that Casey Anthony is indigent. This means that taxpayers
will front the cost for some of her defense on the first-degree murder charge
she’s facing.
MORE DETAILS: