Caylee/Casey Anthony Case: Is Jose Baez Out or Just Vacay?
Orlando, FL– Following a Thursday afternoon request for a status meeting request by newly self-appointed-by-way-of recusal, Chief Judge Belvin Perry, Jose Baez filed a notice of unavailability to the 9th Circuit court.
In fact, he filed notices of unavailability in every case he has on the docket.
Unconfirmed rumors are swirling in abundance today that the Florida Bar Association has finally decided to intervene.
In a conversation with a representative with the FBA this afternoon, blinkoncrime.com was able to learn that if there is a newly filed complaint against Mr. Baez, they would not be able to confirm or deny that information publicly until such time as it reached a “probable cause for investigation status.”
This comes on the heels of former Anthony defense attorney Todd Macaluso’s REMOVAL from the California Bar, effective today.
It is also noteworthy that recent follow up motions by the defense that were sent to a media outlet in error, prior to their filing, have in fact, not been filed with the court to date.
Did J. Cheney Mason due his diligence and discover discovery he was not aware of?
Did the long alleged dissention in the ranks result in Jose Baez leaving the practice of law?
UPDATE:
Late this afternoon, blinkoncrime.com was able to confirm Jose Baez WILL be in attendance this Friday for the management hearing, but will be unavailable for 11 days in June.
Apparently someone has given him the heads up that saying you don’t keep track of your billable hours and then billing clients when your not actually is available is a no no.
Check back to blinkoncrime.com for the developing details.
Related Posts
Related Posts:
167 Comments
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
Ali in PA, Blink doesn’t say Baez IS off the case but she does declare that ‘nothing is confirmed’. We will have to see how this all plays out of course.
Readers have some responsibility too. JMHO.
Did TM actually donate 70,000. or is it 70,000. in “donated” services?
Ex- He charges 350. per hour and he “donated” approx. 200 hours (70,000)
TIA
Peggy
There’s a new headline– Channel 2, WESH
EquuSearch Records May Bring Anthony To Court: Attorney Seeks Hearing On EquuSearch Records
POSTED: 5:20 pm EDT April 26, 2010
UPDATED: 6:01 pm EDT April 26, 2010
“….. A source said EquuSearch plans to file legal paperwork to have the judge order Anthony’s defense to review the records and be done with it.
EquuSearch attorney Mark NeJame would not comment on what the group is planning.”
Blink, regarding Todd’s status change as of today, here’s a pdf link for the recent Order, dated Feb 2010 for the status change that took place today.
http://members.calbar.ca.gov/courtDocs/06-O-14552-3.pdf
Its in the piece, thanks Kleat.
What is interesting, is that I am aware of another complaint that was filed, that never made it to the docket and was settled “on the side”, I think that forced this issue.
B
I’m not understanding the reason for the possibility of Casey suing Baez. My brain is a little slow today. Can she sue him for telling her that she will be found not guilty, has he repeatedly told her this? I find it rather funny if so. It would mean that Casey has been lied to, imagine that, and she has finally met her match with Baez. Both of them are strangers to the truth. I can just see her clinching her fists saying, “NO FAIR,” he lied to me.
I read Baez is going to be at the upcoming status meeting. He only missing 11 days in June.
So Casey sues and wins. 3 questions:
Dear Jose….
“What we have here is a failure to communicate”.
So Casey sues AND wins…….
1. Dose the indigent status still stand?
).
2. Can Casey use this $$$$$ to pay for her defense or will this lawsuit come AFTER the plea (feeling 10 feet tall n bullet proof that the biznitch pleas
3. Where does the money go if Casey cannot use it to cover legal costs?
Apologies x 1000 if these are stupid questions. xo
PS….again, Blink, you grabbed the loot and got the grub.
Baez could be Unavailable that day if he has an appointment Before the Bar…..roflmao….sorry. Also, Cheney said he would walk out of the courthouse with Casey on his arm….she being deemed innocent of all charges thus free as a bird so I am not looking for a plea. That in addition to the fact that Casey has refused to plea up until this point.
I think Baez will get his comeuppance, just as the smarmy parents will get theirs…..in due time. It’s a shame the wheels of justice grind slowly. It is helpful to remember the main goal is the conviction of Caylees’ murderer. The others are secondary goals, imho. I have faith in the justice system that all who have wronged Caylee will pay the piper. Loved Judge Strickland but happy also to see Judge Perry and cannot wait for the hearing this Friday. Only hope Judge Perry does Not ban cameras from his courtroom;)
There is talk about Baez taking a vacation during that time. It seems to me that if this was the case he would not have scheduled any court hearings for the time alloted for his vacation. I don’t think he’s having surgery either, which is a suspicion. Bleeding ulcers can’t wait for surgery. I’m leaning towards the reason being something to do with the FBA.
jrube 8:28 p.m.
Ahhhh, have said many times…..never try to con a con….foflmao…..yes, Baez and Casey are both dancing the dance aren’t they;)
Hi Blink,
I read often and post not so often. In the beginning, when casey was telling LE what happened, I remember LE asked her, (I am paraphrasing of course), if there was an accident and if something bad happened to Caylee and casey said no. In fact, LE asked her if that was the story she wanted to stick with, (the nanny did it), and casey said she was sticking with her story.
After saying there was no accident, can she now claim Caylee’s death was the result of an accident, if a plea is put on the table, or in order to get a plea on the table?
Is this the first vacation Baez took since taking Casey’s case?
I think not. There is a very specific reason for this appearing now.
We’ll just have to wait to see the outcome.
My bet Baez is on the outs with the rest of team Casey and knows he is no longer needed. She has no more funds that he can scrape the barrel for, has a staff he has to pay ..he’s history.
For those who feel that Casey will not ever take a plea deal I respect your opinion.
I will say that push will come to shove very quickly once all defense motions are exhausted. Lyons and Mason are very adept at getting DP clients to see the light and pleaing.
It won’t be about her accepting a plea deal..it will be about the defense requesting a plea deal and the prosecution akaying that deal.
But there will be the defense telling her that they have exhausted the motions, that the prosecution has the evidence, and that if she goes through with a trial she could end up dead.
Let’s not forget according to her letters the defense has been telling her it wasn’t if she gets off..it was when. That whole thought process changed when Mason came on board. He is a last ditch effort to save her life. Winning is everything to him and to Lyons. Their whole rep is tied to that fact. They consider it a win whenever their client doesn’t get the DP. And many, many times that means pleaing.
Casey has not plead out because no one has offered her a reason to believe she needs to plea. Mason and Lyons will make the need to plea crystal clear to her. This will take many months ahead. Due mostly to filing all the motions the defense can on her behalf. But I predict just a few weeks before trail she will plea.
She will plea.
Gypsy is right.
She has been sold, repeatedly, that she is going home. Read hear letters, that girl believes she will beat this. At one point, someone is going to have to explain to her the chance of seeing the outside ever again, and LWOP or the DP.
And since she is inclined to dump her family for the privilege, who does she think will come and see her?
B
#6 Ragdoll
Sorry y’all for the poor editing
http://members.calbar.ca.gov/courtDocs/06-O-14552-2.pdf
Blink, that’s the link in the piece (above) of the ADP hearing details, the link I added (below) was the actual 3 page ‘Order’ from the judge that gives the date of today as start date. It has a different pdf number.
http://members.calbar.ca.gov/courtDocs/06-O-14552-3.pdf
Thanks friend, I forgot I had not linked that one, I appreciate the correction.
B
In most situations wouldn’t a ‘Notice of Unavailability’ be filed far in advance – as if saying to the court “FYI – I’m out of town that week so don’t schedule any of my cases or last minute tete-a-tetes on those days.” ?
In our us constitution, the defense or the accused *Casey’s not been convicted in her child’s death* do not have to prove anything, or even call any witnesses. This is what I talked about before with hatred blinding people to the point where all they see and smell is blood, blood, blood! you were so quick to *remove* Baez from the case that you started an internet rumor, before you got your facts straight!
Also, if you have ever read the bill of rights in our us constitution you’ll now know that *In criminal litigation, the burden of proof is always on the state. The state must prove that the defendant is guilty. The defendant is presumed to be innocent; the defendant ***needs to prove nothing.*** There are exceptions. If the defendant wishes to claim that he/she is insane, and therefore not guilty, the defendant bears the burden of proving his/her insanity. Other exceptions include defendants who claim self-defense or duress.
In criminal litigation, the state must prove that the defendant satisfied each element of the statutory definition of the crime, and the defendant’s participation, ***beyond a reasonable doubt*** which includes cause of death folks. It is difficult to put a valid numerical value on the probability that a guilty person really committed the crime, but legal authorities who do assign a numerical value generally say “at least 98% or 99%” certainty of guilt.* The ignorance of criminal law on these blogs is frighteningly unbelievable. also in reference to the mystery hair not connected to any of the anthonys including Casey and her child, it is the state’s burden to prove and show the jury whether or not it is tied to the child’s remains and her murder or not, not Casey’s lawyers! Stop the lynch mob mentality and let’s talk about what this case is all about for once without the sensationalism.
Action-
You have no idea what your talking about, my background, or my involvement in criminal investigation and or law.
To make such a carte blanche statement, aren’t you the one showing your ignorance?
What was your point anyway?
B
Can Todd Macaluso pratice law in another state?
NO.
B
blueonblue,
Question is, would it be the Baez shuffle or the Casey bustdown dance?? LOL I am certain that even though they view themselves as celebrities they will not be getting a casting call from dancing w/the stars.
Blink said:
She will plea.
Gypsy is right.
She has been sold, repeatedly, that she is going home. Read hear letters, that girl believes she will beat this. At one point, someone is going to have to explain to her the chance of seeing the outside ever again, and LWOP or the DP.
And since she is inclined to dump her family for the privilege, who does she think will come and see her?
B
***************************
Blink, luv ya as I do, I usually trust your infinite wisdom and wholeheartedly agree, and you may end up being correct on this one as well, but for now, I strongly disagree. We all know Casey is a stubborn, spiteful B*tch; not a snowball’s chance in Haiti do I see her copping a plea! Casey, Mason, Baez and Lyon are in- it-to-win-it, and you said it yourself, “Casey has been told she is going home” – I agree with you, she has, as well as the Mason jar-head has also told the public he’s going to exit that jail arm-in-arm with Casey. Now I realize the blowhard factor here with Mason, but I really do believe his and Lyon’s arrogance will push this to the trial, thinking they can confuse the jury enough with BS that they can give Casey a chance at freedom.
Do I believe she’ll ever be free? Never, no way, no how, absolutely not, but we’re talking Mason-mentality here, not my mentality. And face it, not one of those Attorneys care in the least about Casey, they care about themselves, their own “win” of an acquittal, so if Casey is convicted, they aren’t going to care about her, but they’ll take the chance with the roll of the dice they can win this. A plea, for them, will not be freedom, which is what they have promised Casey and the public in this case.
There’s also the fact that I doubt the State would entertain a plea at this point, (or ever), but on the chance that I’m wrong and you’re right on this, what kind of plea do you see them willing to offer? It has to be something less than LWOP, because there’s a very good chance that what she’ll end up with at trial, and I just don’t see them offering anything less – another reason I believe there will be no plea. Piss on Casey getting 30 yrs., that’s not nearly enough for what she did to Caylee and I just don’t see the State feeling as though it is either. Your thoughts on what the State may offer?
And to Action:
In the sense of legal terminology only, you’re right, she has to offer nothing as her Defense. However, in the sense of whether Casey values her life, she most certainly does have to provide a Defense as she has a helluvalotta ‘splainin’ to do either by taking the stand, (never happen) or through her Attorneys, and I guarantee 100% that Jury will expect it, in fact, they will demand it. Without it, Casey will be screwed without a kiss, likely not the first time that’s happened to her!
If you really want to know my point “B” (very interesting initial for you), it is that you don’t allow for others to present alternative, different, or OMG!! *dissenting* views. I feel and believe that you have this *preach to the choir, rather lynch mob mentality* and for what? So that your fellow *participants* on this blog will applaud you? You should allow others to post why it is that we have a court system in this country and that every citizen, even someone like Casey Anthony, is entitled to a fair trial by a jury of his/her peers, without outrageous claims of guilt and basically calls for *blood* on these web pages and blogs. That is where I believe, you fail. What if someone *in your* family was accused of such serious crimes? Wouldn’t you want him/her to have his/her due process and *day in court* before damning him/her to the pits of hell? metaphorically speaking that is.
You have never actually read the work here have you?
If you did, you might actually cite an article, or incorrect fact, on this case.
But you won’t, because you cannot, and your fine just humping a *theory* or making others out to sound like stoners of the chick in the town square.
Not the case. Stop Insulting very intelligent and compassionate people that are fine to seek justice over a dead baby vs. good will to her murderous mother.
B
Again to Action, I meant to add this to my post:
If you think for one minute the “mystery hair” will be the clincher to set Casey free, think again, and think hard; it won’t be. It appears you’re not giving enough credence to the word “reasonable” in, “reasonable doubt”, but the Jury most certainly will. They will take into consideration the fact that Caylee’s bones were scattered and fed upon by animal activity, as well as her bones suffered “movement” throughout that forest floor due to swamp conditions, aided by a Hurricane Faye. I am sure her bones came in contact with many foreign substance and items during that movement of water, and it’s reasonable (there’s that word again) to believe a foreign hair floating about may have also crossed the path of Caylee’s bones.
As for cause of death, Casey stupidly handed the Jury that puzzle piece as she tightly taped Caylee’s breathing passages closed with duct tape. Jurors, as a rule, really, really despise baby killers, particularly when the killer is that baby’s birth-parent, and especially when that birth-parent follows suit thereafter with such a wickedly evil disposal of her baby’s body as Casey did. Casey is toast, period.
I don’t believe Casey will ever plea. Because she would have to tell the truth, what happened and that will never happen! Casey knows nothing about lying and stealing. Which her parents allowed her to do. Her parents never corrected her. I sometimes believe Cindy is cause of this,I can see her telling George she will raise the kids and he has no say in it!!!
Blink, did AJ just call you a ‘B’??? That’s name-calling and rude. Obviously AJ hasn’t got a clue about how to argue a point if he or she is just calling names. That poster is here for one reason and one reason only.
———————
Now, to a real comment, is there a relationship between ABC and Hearst Television Inc? It’s of a WESH report but that’s not the source of the problem, it’s content within that report. (other WESH news releases aren’t blocked so it has to be something contained in their report).
This is a video example about the sensors or copyright protectors– wondering if it might be tied to the ABC and affiliates purchased content as part of the 200 thousand. http://www.youtube.com/user/hornsbylaw#p/u/65/IKuRTm6Q2vQ
lol lol.
B is for bubble. Bubble, bubble, bubble..
B
Blink, on the cba link, I wasn’t trying to correct, just had to dig a bit to find out the significance of today, I’d forgot that he hadn’t gone inactive a month ago. So I looked at the Ca bar site and noticed the order with the ‘effective date’ and shared it as an addition, vs correction.
share some of those bubbles please!! If it’s b bubbles, as in ‘b’everage bubbles!
To ActionJackson:
First of all, the State has all they need to try this case & are prepared to get a guilty verdict. There is a small child’s life that has been taken, that is why people are crying “blood blood blood” as you call it. It’s not as if people cry blood in every case/situation, do your homework. But in this one, there is good reason to cry “blood”: a small child’s life has been taken, and the evidence is mounted up & pointing to ONE person, even before the body was found. Which brings me to my next point:
The “beyond reasonable doubt” does not HAVE to include “cause of death”, as the State was already seeking the death penalty before the body was found. They found several pieces evidence that the murder was planned in advance, & not an accident. If it was planned in advance, the preponderance of evidence will show “beyond reasonable doubt” that the death of this baby was NOT an accident, so in that circumstance the “cause of death” is not needed.
And as far as the unidentified hair, read the discovery documents starting from day one, & don’t have selective memory when you read it. The documents show police collected all kinds of evidence that even they say alot of it was UNRELATED to the crime scene. In which case, if the defense wants to counter that, they WILL have to come up with a good reason/argument for it.
You make it sound as if all the defense has to do is sit back & wait for trial, cuz it’s all the State’s work. There is hard work the defense has to put in, or “should” put in. (none of which Bozo is doing, that we can tell anyway).
So get your panties out of a wad. In addition to your ignorance, you’re showing a deeply lazy side of yourself, that if you were the defense, you’d just sit back, let the state “prove” stuff, & you have no counter argument because you just did not do your job of fighting for your client.
You’ve used alot of big words, throw in some “U.S. Constitution” here & some “statutory definition” there, and some “criminal litigation” there, make it sound like you know what your talking about, but what it really sounds like is you read those words out of a book, but it didn’t soak into your brain, and certainly don’t have “hands-on” experience in a legal setting. Even the nonexperienced, nonlegal common folk people can see right down to your moronic brains. You really sound idiotic. Sounds like you just want to join in the discussion, jumped on the train late & got only half the info.
Have a wonderful day.
Action, I’m asking this with absolute sincerity.
Nothing will stop Casey from getting her day in court, least of all this blog. So please, save your Constitution speech, Bill of Rights drama and all that goes with it. Those will be important and strictly adhered to the nth degree during her trial, or plea, guided by Judge Perry.
So let’s cut to the chase. What really is your point? What is it that you’re afraid of? And most important, please be sure to take into consideration the fact that this blog is not the court room when you give your much awaited answer.
Blink! B is Bubble and Bubble Gum B is for brother that bought me some -Bubble Bubble Bubble- Thanks for the memory
Action since day 31 everything has pointed to Casey Anthony ‘s guilt. But We are still here pondering her lawyers ethics and each sides strategy- so therefore we can not be part of a lynch Mob. But instead concerned citizens and advocates for 2 year old Caylee Marie, the victim, who was thrown away and forgotten.
Dissenting opinions are welcome AJ. IF respectfully given.
If she takes a plea will it be the prosecution that offers her..her sentence or will the judge ultimately be the person who sentences IT!
cont’d to ActionJackson:
If you had any kind of genuine interest in legal cases, you would already know about the Lacy Peterson case. They put his rear on death row withOUT a body, therefore withOUT a cause of death. Sounds like to me, you just like stirring up drama, and you should be ashamed of yourself for using the death of a baby to do so. Shame on you.
Good Morning Blink and everyone,
- Action Jackson. You really are injust to Blink and Blinkers that are open mindet people and very moderate in their way of expressing, your terms and insinuation about B from Blink are more than mediocre and without any level.
So if you don’t like it don’t read it! Like your friend use to say : Hasta Pasta
ActionJackson: The ignorance of criminal law on these blogs is frighteningly unbelievable. also in reference to the mystery hair not connected to any of the anthonys including Casey and her child, it is the state’s burden to prove and show the jury whether or not it is tied to the child’s remains and her murder or not.
..i don’t think the SA has to “prove” anything regarding this hair. in fact—–i don’t think it will even be mentioned at trial. who cares about this stray hair that quite possibly “blew in with the wind?”
..the SA will use their time to “prove” the evidence they do have—-which is substanstial.
..i’m still mystified that casey didn’t take the plea offer ‘way back when’, ( i think r.hornsby said he thought it was 8 years? of course, they were also dealing $$$’s with ABC at the time—-prioritie$ count i guess.)
..it’s been like watching the blind leading the blind in this case—–friday——-new judge in town—-can’t wait to see him in action.
B= Beautiful
I am so mad that someone has the nerve to come here and accuse our blink of anything so obsurd.
I also cannot believe they would not REALIZE that she did not have post either of the comments, as she is the MODERATOR/OWNER of this site. I come here for the simple reason that bashin is not allowed here and also if I want to discuss “reasonable doubt” it is OKAY to do here……
Thanks again Blink for all that you do….
I dont think he ever gave Casey 70,000, why would he do that?
He didn’t even know her before this case. I think TM invested in this case as he WAS TOLD he would get it back but double….
OH well, this is EXACTLY why I quit practicing in the legal field because of lawyers like this….
River Cruz Upset That Bloggers Speculate Mystery Hair May Be Hers.
April 27, 2010
Dr. Lillian Glass Body Language Expert
Says It’s Impossible As She Never Met Caylee. If Hair Is Hers, Did George Set “Zanny the Nanny Prototype” Up And Put It There?
Dr. Lillian Glass wrote 4 hours ago: RIVER UPSET OVER BLOGGERS ALLEGATIONS I received a call from River Cruz this evening around 5 pm PST … more →
http://drlillianglassbodylanguageblog.wordpress.com/
“OutofOrder says:
April 27, 2010 at 12:37 am
Again to Action, I meant to add this to my post:
If you think for one minute the “mystery hair” will be the clincher to set Casey free, think again, and think hard;”
wasn’t this hair found near the remains, wasn’t this area underwater, doesn’t hair float, that hair could have come from anywhere if the Defense is banking on that one strand of hair IMO that is one sorry defense, that hair could have been blown in from the wind, my hair is to my waste and sheds like crazy and when I am in the car driving and I find a piece of hair hanging I pull it off my sleeve (or where ever) and out the window it goes, I have my DNA all over Europe…
Jackson, it is ok for you to spew on and on about the Constitution and innocent until proven guilty blah blah blah…however, we don’t need a reminder, we aint lynchin no one on this site, we haven’t forgotten… but if you are going to spew on and on may I kindly remind you to remember freedom of speech and the rights to Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness, those Rights were taken from Caylee, does that matter to you??????
We are all here for Justice for that Beautiful Baby Girl who was murdered and dumped like trash (by her OWN Mother) a blind man could that she is the one who murdered Caylee, she does deserve fairness in the court of law, but lets not forget Caylee also deserve JUSTICE….never forget that….! Where were her rights when she was silenced with duct tape, stuffed inside a trash bag and thrown into the swamp lands to rot and devoured by animals and insects…Why don’t you take some of that anger and place it where it belongs and that would be next to an innocent child who’s was forgotten by her own family who’s rights were violated beyond any possible way Casey’s rights would ever be, unless she was silenced with duct tape, placed in a garbage bag and left to rot in a swamp, lucky for her she gets her 3 squares, a cot, more than Caylee will EVER get AGAIN!!!!
Now if you please travel on over to one of those sites set up by the A’s or the Defense and enjoy your time over there supporting a mother who took her baby’s life and dumped her like last weeks leftovers so she could get her bumb and grind on, then pimped her photos to the highest bidder like she was a newest brand of Nike Shoes, that sick and twisted b*!$& is exactly where she needs to be and that is exactly where she is going to stay…God willing.
Peace and Love!
Blink, if Casey can sue her lawyer(s), what then is the impact of the civil case? Also,since Casey has admitted in letters that JB was passing letters back and forth could the FBA request copies of his visits to Casey. Could that be why they have fought so hard to have no video during jail visits and have any existing ones destroyed? TIA
I have the perfect job for Jose when he’s no longer on the case. He can be one of the experts on Jane Velez-Mitchell’s “fantastic panels” and can sit next to that other expert whom we’ve all come to rely on for his terrific expertise and commentary on all things criminal — Curtis Sliwa, founder of the Guardian Angels. LOL!
Mr. Action Jackson,
I’ll reserve comment because Blink can handle you just fine. Just to be clear, no one’s perfect on here. Some posters do get their facts mixed up and usually, if caught, someone corrects it. It’s important to read from beginning to end. The BOTTOM line is justice for Caylee Marie Anthony. That’s our inspiration on here! She was murdered and we are going to be her voice.
Understood?
Team Blink
Good morning all! (((((((GROUP HUGS))))))))
Kleat, thank you for all your contributions. I am continually being educated in the process by you and other incredible poster friends. Thank you for your time and patience with us waaaayyyyy less knowledgeable posters.
Blink, thank you for making this house a home, especially for the ones who can’t speak for themselves. xo
For the record, I do believe Casey will pleas. WHY? Because her life is most important to her and if she has to make it work behind bars, she will.
She is narcassistic enough to see that the world without her will stop spinnnig and there’ll be no Alyssa Milano look a like to pine over, even if it’s negative attention. She LOVES the hype, even behind bars.
She’ll plea but she won’t go quietly.
Action…sit down and STFU! Anyone is allowed to post their views and or beliefs, dissenting or not B welcomes it as long as it is done with respect of others. We here happen to believe in the guilt of one who murdered a child. Go find another blog to release yourself on and enjoy it. If you must continue you may just meet your match. Attacking people for no reason it not nice. I apologize for the ugliness this am B but I don’t like you or this site bad mouthed.
Ty, Appreciated, let’s let AJ die on the vine now. It was clear from the start he was looking for a way to sell his wares. Not what we are here for.
B
To Nancy: B=Beautiful
How nice and true
39.ChicagoJudy says:
April 27, 2010 at 8:05 am
LOLOLOLOLOL!
ORRRRRRRRRR….would you rather see him berated by the likes of NG?????
‘WHOA WHOA WHOA, BOZO!’
I think what we are doing is not always the most important case in life but the Way we are doing it. Not the goal is the goal but the way there. I respect people like Mr Baez for the courage and force to stand up for the Lost souls of this Earth but i don’t understand the methods doing it. They seems wrong to me as the layman that i am and i don’t think it was the best way to defend his client. As à legal representant i would have seaken the truth and worked with those facts.
“JCfromGa says:
April 27, 2010 at 3:20 am”
small correction, if I may, the bodies of Lacy and her baby washed a shore, few days later identified and then the arrest was made
Dee –
The mystery hair was found on a piece of paper in the lab after the contents of the bag was dumped out containing the Disney balloon, Gatorade bottle and other misc. items.
The hair could have been stuck to the bottle, the balloon, washed in with the deluge of water at that site or heck, it could have fallen off a tree or blown in the wind from miles away.
Regardless, it’s not by any means a “gotcha” issue in Casey’s favor and certainly will not be considered “exculpatory”.
I am not sure that is correct, I believe it was found with Q107, a black piece of plastic.
B
Good Morning to All…., I believe the State still has some damning physical evidence to convict Casey….. we just need to sit back and wait for it to unfold…… I am thinking prints…DNA….?
Good Morning!
Perhaps Jose’s tummy aches have gotten the best of him and needs ulcer surgery ??? Just wondering ….