Casey Anthony Post Verdict Press Conference: Investigators With OCSO To Speak Today 1:30PM EST
Orlando, FL- The Lead Investigators in the murder of Caylee Marie Anthony are finally speaking out.
Led by brief words by Orange County Sheriff Jerry Demings, Sgt. John Allen, Cpl Yuri Melich , Cpl Eric Edwards and four other investigators will take questions from the press.
It is also expected that the OCSO ask for privacy for the jurors, and also for citizens to not compromise the safety of it’s officers when Casey is released.
Check back to www.blinkoncrime.com for updates
Related Posts
Related Posts:
294 Comments
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
No perjury charges for Cindy.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/43729892
UGH!
I sure do hope they charge Cindy with perjury. I mean they locked up that crazy lady at jury selection for shouting out, locked up the kid that flipped the bird. Why would Cindy be any different. In fact what she did is much much worse IMO. Also, let’s see if and when Casey goes home to collect her baby daughter’s ashes. I seriously doubt that will EVER happen. That will just prove to all what a sociopath she really is.
Following links from my search of Det. Snuffleupagus.
Why wasn’t Ryan Pasley called on to testify against Casey (rhetorical)? He knew her better than her family. He doesn’t come across as someone who’s surprised by her extensive experience of lying like a cheap rug.
http://www.wesh.com/news/17303070/detail.html
I have seen the Justice Department swoop in with a denial of civil rights action in lesser cases. I would think that would still be a viable option here, correct?
I am not hearing that there is basis for that. Did you watch Fuhrman?
B
@I am doubtful they would announce that, any issue regarding whether or not Cindy will be charged with perjury will come from the State Attorney Office.
B
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Another downer no perjury charges:
http://www.wftv.com/news/28521417/detail.html
@ chelsea,
Thank you, friendy. The Royal couple were a tremendous hit! They did a surprise stop over in Slave Lake, Alberta (a few hours north of where I live). Slake Lake was literally ravaged and almost wiped off the Alberta map by a devestating wild fire. There’s nothing left but ruins.
This was the kind of inspiration this town needed to uplift their spirits. I’m grateful for the Royals extension of compassion <3
Blink says:
July 12, 2011 at 3:37 pm
Thanks for the link Blink. Fuhrman makes so much sense and Greta’s in “stop him” mode because she wants to have continued access to the jurors. Greta states that she has such respect for the jury and I’ve heard the same from Sunny Hostin (listened to HLN on the way home).
Sunny can’t believe the negative feelings the public has towards the jury! I’m not advocating violence against them, but come on – the public outrage is justified (especially after they speak and try to justify their verdict LOL).
There have been lots of great questions and posts here. I am wondering if there are investigations going on behind the scenes as to this jury and Jose Baez. This verdict was surreal. I can’t help but think that a not guilty verdict was virtually impossible, yet that’s what we got. Runaway Jury alright.
I wouldn’t put anything past Baez (or Mason for that matter).
I’m not familiar with Greta. I’ve seen her show a handful of times at the very most. What I just watched from Blink’s link didn’t impress me. You can respect a jury and still say…they got it wrong. Fuhrman asked a great question and Greta diverted Baez style.
I was just getting all worked up…then it’s done. I feel like the power went out just before the killer was revealed
Is their a difference when a TV station pays a person directly for an interview or when they pay licensing fees for pics & names of the people ? I think ABC does that. Perhaps these jurors got paid a licensing fee for their pics & names being used or another perk like the Disney trip for juror Ford.
Response from e-mail to Simon & Schuster:
Hello,
Thank you for contacting SimonandSchuster.com. We appreciate your concern on this matter, but please be aware that Simon & Schuster is not publishing, and has never intended to publish, any book by Casey Anthony, her family, or any member of her team.
Regards,
SimonandSchuster.com Customer Service
@ Ragdoll says:
July 12, 2011 at 4:26 pm
Fuhrman asked a great question and Greta diverted Baez style.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Greta’s still an attorney first TV interviewer second..
Hope someone approaches Mark Fuhrman to investigate “things” . . .
bobkealing bob kealing
Yes we have complaint, friend“@YancyFaith: @bobkealing @WESH It’s already filed with the court?”
27 minutes ago
»
bob kealing
bobkealing bob kealing
Breaking..Texas Equusearch files suit today against #CaseyAnthony for fraud. Seeking damages. @WESH.
41 minutes ago
****
“Texas EquuSearch Suing Casey Anthony”
“Suit Alleges Anthony’s Lies Led To Unnecessary Searches”
http://www.wesh.com/casey-anthony-extended-coverage/28525235/detail.html
Blink says:
July 12, 2011 at 3:37 pm
Watch this.
http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/on-the-record/index.html#/v/1041310649001/did-casey-jurors-really-deliberate/?playlist_id=86925
I know Mr. Fuhrman effed the OJ case and should have been honest, but those that know my work, will agree his investigative skills are outstanding.
Greta cut him off from his rant, and I want to hear it.
B
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I like Fuhrman even though he did the no no thing in the OJ case he is the type of person that doesn’t let something drop once he puts his mind to it & he sounds challenged by this case. Greta likes her guests to agree with her JMO & Mark wasn’t going there. Didn’t Fuhrman open up the Martha Moxley case again ?
I recently studied his work on the Moxley case, via a former Behavioral Scientist retired from the FBI.
I have watched his instincts in other cases, he has solid skills, imo.
B
Just got a text that Equusearch filed a lawsuit against Casey for $112,000! I hope they get it to continue searching for those that are actually missing. Oy.
Man, I should have done my homework.
Why would Casey need to call the likes of Ryan Palmer?
Mark Furhman reaction July 6th…….have to put up with the commercial first.
http://video.foxnews.com/v/1040117999001/mark-fuhrman-on-shocking-casey-anthonys-acquittal
TES going after Creature Anthony in civil suit.
http://texasequusearch.org/2011/07/texas-equusearch-mounted-search-and-recovery-v-casey-anthony/
Wow, Blink. I guess that I missed that you shut down the Anthony Family FIRST Trust fund. I feel better already. You are a ‘bee in a bonnet’ & I admire you for everything that you do.
I heart y’all.
PLEASE read before you post. Major duplications.
Thank You Kindly.
B
About the TES filing suit– it’s all official and in black and white on the myorangeclerk.com website– all paid up, judge assigned, and a new lawyer who just might have what it takes to take on the tough as nails girl with the smile that works. Oh, and of course, the defendant served.
ZFG is no longer alone on the civil case page for this ICA.
All the best to both!
I keep thinking that the defense is now saying “Sh$T”! What are we going doing do with her now”? I don’t think they expected this verdict anymore than the rest of us. My belief is they were hoping no DP. I get satisfaction in thinking their is unrest in their glory. I could be wrong though………
Ragdoll: His name was Kato (not Kiko) and he was thrust into the case not by choice but the uncomfortable position of living on OJ’s property in a guesthouse, originally because he was Nicole’s friend. He was the only witness around that night to know OJ’s comings and goings, went to McD drive thru with him etc.
Kato is also a friend of one of my friends and I met him at a bday dinner we both attended. He seemed very unpretentious, unassuming and basically a cool, nice guy. He was a young aspiring actor up to the murder and trial, but his televised testimony memorialized him as the ‘infamous house guest’ and made it impossible for him to get cast. His friend was murdered and it defined his life, pretty much ruining his career. I don’t remember him trying to capitalize on it, seemed he was the likable guy of the trial and the media kind of ‘chose’ him. He may have been on a reality show years later, maybe he wrote a book I don’t know – but he didn’t inject himself in the case nor aggressively pursue all he could.
I remember that dinner party was when OJ’s book had come out. Someone obviously brought it up – “If I Did it”, Kato smirked and said, “What do you mean IF?” His response got some laughs and I think he used it a few times in TV interviews. But the impression I got that after years of people automatically associating him with the OJ trial and probably always bringing it up, he seemed over it and wished everyone was too.
Ragdoll says:
July 12, 2011 at 3:59 pm
I was just googling OJ’s case. I never familiarized myself with the forensics, etc. Fuhrman I remember because of racist comments. Thank GOD that blonde dude (Kiko? LOL…whatever his name) faded into oblivion. This is EXACTLY what will happen to anyone trying to milk the cash cow. All they are is the flavour or the minute.
Blink,
Duplications might be because posts sit in moderation. I know I look before I post but once posts are filtered…bam bam bam…similar posts show up.
That’s just been my experience time to time. <3
Thank you and your right, especially on a day I am backed up.
B
Blink: during Greta’s interview last night with ##11 she also had a defense PI on…Pat Mckenna. Pat was also a pi for F. Lee Baily who brought him into the OJ case. After OJ’s acquittal he pledged to help OJ find the “real” killers.
Weird or what. So many fruits & nuts in this cake
Let’ say I am familiar with Mr. McKenna’s work and I dare say, he pales in comparison to some other unsavory PI’s in this case.
B
No perjury charges for Cindy Anthony for blatantly lying on the stand. I know it is hard to prove perjury, after all Cindy was on medications that affected her memory. Ok, so I know she lost her granddaughter and was trying to save her daughter but what message does it say about justice. No wonder Casey has absolutely no problem with lying.
What about Contempt of Court for Mr. Baez.? What do you want to bet that goes no where either. A couple of weeks ago Attorney Mark Geragos actually laughed at the possible Contempt of Court charge. He said defense lawyers dont even worry about it. Yea, so what, happens all the time. Not going to happen. Is this all just theater????
It all makes me sick………what an education.
Oh, ok we dont have to agree with the jury but we should respect them. Well,…………….Why?
Blink with this new filing by TES, what happened to Mark Nejame, wasn’t he their lawyer? sorry to see that, i was hoping to see him in action
Mark did not feel his representation in this action was appropriate, given his closeness to the issue.
I completely agree.
B
Well, Well, Well, I know the Anthonys didn’t expect Casey to get totally off, scott fricking free. What ya gonna do now??? Should be interesting.
Thanks for that quick response Blink, i’m sure he will be following the case behind the scenes, he knows who he’s dealing with – next time you cross paths with him, send my respects – seems to be an awesome guy, very cute and charming – give him a big hug from me and tell him Thank You for not giving up!!!
Here are some excerpts from the jury instructions:
Lets start with Rule 1…
(I didn’t want to clog up the page with the entire document but here is the link. within it you will find in highlighted red where the jury’s reasoning is in direct conflict with the rules.)
http://phoebe53.wordpress.com/2011/07/12/jury-instructions-for-casey-anthony-jury/
RULES FOR DELIBERATION
These are some general rules that apply to your discussion. You must follow these rules in order to return a lawful verdict:
1. You must follow the law as it is set out in these instructions. If you fail to follow the law, your verdict will be a miscarriage of justice. There is no reason for failing to follow the law in this case. All of us are depending upon you to make a wise and legal decision in this matter.
2. This case must be decided only upon the evidence that you have heard from the testimony of the witnesses and have seen in the form of the exhibits in evidence and these instructions.
3. This case must not be decided for or against anyone because you feel sorry for anyone, or are angry at anyone.
4. Remember, the lawyers are not on trial. Your feelings about them should not influence your decision in this case.
5. Your duty is to determine if the defendant has been proven guilty or not, in accord with the law.
6. Whatever verdict you render must be unanimous, that is, each juror must agree to the same verdict.
7. It is entirely proper for a lawyer to talk to a witness about what testimony the witness would give if called to the courtroom. The witness should not be discredited by talking to a lawyer about his or her testimony.
8. Your verdict should not be influenced by feelings of prejudice, bias or sympathy.
Your verdict must be based on the evidence, and on the law contained in thes instructions.
CAUTIONARY INSTRUCTION
Deciding a verdict is exclusively your job. I cannot participate in that decision in any way.
Please disregard anything I may have said or done that made you think I preferred one verdict over another.
VERDICT
You may find the defendant guilty as charged in the indictment or guilty of such lesser included crime as the evidence may justify or not guilty.
If you return a verdict of guilty, it should be for the highest offense which has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt. If you find that no offense has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt, then, of course, your verdict must be not guilty.
Only one verdict may be returned as to each crime charged. This verdict must be unanimous, that is, all of you must agree to the same verdict. The verdict must be in writing and for your convenience the necessary forms of verdict have been prepared for you. They are as follows:
SINGLE DEFENDANT, MULTIPLE COUNTS
A separate crime is charged in each count of the indictment and while they have been tried together each crime and the evidence applicable to it must be considered separately and a separate verdict returned as to each. A finding of guilty or not guilty as to one crime must not affect your verdict as to the other crimes charged.
We wanted her in jail, but reality will be the biggest prison for her because she will be out, but she wont be able to do what she wants to do – she wont be able to even utter her own name. The world is her prison.
PS – there are multiple other and more official sites with the jury instructions, the one I posted are the same instructions, just has the important parts highlighted in red for convenience.
I hope that we find out who will be subsidizing Casey upon her release this Sunday. She doesn’t even have enough money to purchase peanuts.
Mark Nejame is a class act! I’m glad he is steering Mr. Miller in the right direction and pray he gets some restitution for those costs!
About that McKenna guy, he stated that they presented ‘evidence’ to George, to which he gave a 23 second pause and did not answer. Apparently he confronted him with an issue or something Casey told them. Therefore, he says he believes the molestation issue. So, WHY, if they have this supposed evidence aren’t they or Casey rather, persuing charges?
Thanks for the links today guys. I do have a question- audio on wftv was lousy. Investigator Osbourne, was she referring to what exactly in re to the cacheback programs? I recall in testimony there was an issue with the time stamp, did I miss something else?
Re Furman, drives me nuts. I sure wish he could have finished his thought. Wonder if she will have him on after part II. Though, that discussion will be miles away.
the jury had trouble believing George but did they ever question Casey..Oh that’s right the defense called her a lying slut, it had to be George..the weakest link….caused he seem to be lying…& you can’t trust a liar…duh, Casey
Folks, First I want to say that I ABSOLUTELY love Mark Furman. I am always looking for video clips on the internet with his insight.
Second: I just can’t take any more of this. I watched the verdict at my brothers house and could hardly breathe as the verdict was seconds away from being read. After hearing Not Guilty, I nearly fell to the ground with dizziness and nausea. I have to turn to my Lord and Savior now and ask him to look over angel Caylee. I know in my heart that Casey will be held accountable for what she has done. I refuse to let that evil woman have an effect on my life and my day to day attitide. There is evil amongst us and ultimately good will win out everytime.
After watching the wonderful team’s post verdict press conference today, I am more convinced than ever that there will be justice. It’s not showing its face yet, but God has something in store for all the hard work and honest effort put out by this fabulous group of LE officers. I speak for the prosecution team’s effort too. Justice will come – we just have to be patient.
WPG – Perfect word usage for the Anthony’s – “teflon”.
Seems like the liars are winning round after round, but the truth will prevail. The ‘good guys’ will win eventually. Patience people, patience. The ‘heavens’ have heard the uproar loud and clear.
Part II:
*We were looking for a felony……..
*We were charged to look at cause of death
*Lee was genuine, lots of responsibility
*Hesitation on liking SAO- they wanted more, they were professional, some poor taste ie: JA & smirking, pigsnablanket,
*DT- always professional, good job, they did good w/ defending, good closing
*All jurors dd a good job- quality vs quantity -lol
*Press conf- too much stress for us, difficult for some, needed to gather their thoughts
*Foreman- he was voted unanimously-X one F, but she was voted, geez- Juror Ford?
*Prevote- right away- murder 10-2 NG first hour. The two found tape & *Chloro important- imagine that?
*What changed the guilty? I dont know- it was next day.
G for lying no brainer
*Didnt pre-research much- Oh really not much?
commercial break
Sorry for my typos- my (i) is sticking among other issues.
OMG- Dot wants her to be treated w/ dignity. I am kinda annoyed Greta is cutting the juror interview-very sneaky.
Dot also says she is getting lots of supportive emails. Chloro a whole lot of nothing. Odor had much differing accounts by various people. The grief counselor was excellent in expl various rxns to grief. lol
BTW- her new haircut makes her look terrible and revealed some ? work?
My husband just said- omg she is such an idiot. He hasn’t seen the half of it.
Cont part II:
Worthless!!
Greta has pizzed me off so badly- she cut everyone off. You are right B, she doesnt usually act like this. I’d say she is preparing to have Casey on.
@ eloise. Dang. I say you may be right.
@ Eloise
I had some audio issues with wftv too. I think there were some issues with the software (cacheback), initially. I’m not sure what the exact problem was (timestamps???). Cacheback went back to work on the software, made ajdustments, etc. Osbourne was able to run the program effectively after corrections were made. I believe (could be wrong) that it was the 2nd time they got the 84 hits on chloroform.
I will look for a link and double check my recollection
If anyone can weigh in, in the meantime…fantastical!
JA acted inappropriately? REALLY.
Were we watching the same trial as the jurors? I’m way out there with this, but someone must have got to those jurors. The more they talk, the more it doesn’t make any sense. My hinky is on def con 4.
I agree JA had moments. BAEZ….where does one begin?
Wendy Murphy has (today) certainly been raising red flags about sealed evidence pointing to Casey pimping Caylee to child predators. While I would like to blow her off, everything she says seems to fill in the gaps of the nagging questions I have had regarding the details surrounding Caylee’s remains. Could someone talk me out of this, or is Wendy correct in applying pressure in this direction to look at her death as a result of child porn pros getting even with Casey for some perceived lack of compliance with their demands? It surely doesn’t take Casey off the hook; on the contrary, it could very well make her responsible for the death in a sinister but peripheral role.
Blog responses to Greta show- it makes me feel better to know that I am not just mean spirited, though I have been said to be acting foul x 1 week.
http://gretawire.foxnewsinsider.com/2011/07/11/fast-casey-anthony-comments-click/
@ Eloise
@ about 24:57, a question was raised by media member regarding defense’s accusations of fraudulent evidence from computer forensics.
@ 26:00, Osbourne talks specifically about errors found in software. Developer was notified and fixed problems.
http://www.wftv.com/video/28524185/index.html
Oh.My.Gosh.
The jury foreman said they couldn’t “legally” take Casey’s behavior into consideration when rendering a verdict. They were tasked with determining cause of death.
Dear God – my head is going to explode.
I say she has lost all the respect I had for her, and I had a lot. True colors always come out at some point. Just watch the rest of this mess unfold.
I thought the same thing about Greta. I’ve rarely viewed her show, so I can’t comment about previous interviews. I’ve just felt the latest 2 interviews I’ve seen made Greta appear as though she’s chanelling a wee bit of NG, lately. Not nearly as wicked. Maybe this trial is bringing out the ugly in all of us. It really does help to tune out. The longer we expose ourselves to the hype, the longer it will take to move on and put it behind us. Doesn’t mean we’re forgetting about Caylee. Impossible!
Glad I’m not the only one who noticed Greta’s getting a tad snippy.