Caylee/Casey Anthony Case: New Discovery Released Includes FBI Lab Results
Orlando,
The documents are expected to include FBI lab reports that are critical to the case; some of which had been “leaked” to the press last week.
In the first part of the release, the information seems to focus on Dominick Casey’s report of “threat asessment” or cheat sheet as he referred to it. He specifically mentions the knife Leonard Padilla keeps in a sheath in the rear waistline of his pants. He also alleges one of the detectives in the case is having an affair with reporter Jessica D’onofrio.
In an e-mail sent to Cindy Anthony on Feb. 2 at 4:38 a.m., the private investigator tells her: “I found out tonight that Jessica Denofrio [sic] is having an affair with one of the Detectives at OCSO. Have not found out which Detective it is yet but working on finding out.”
Blinkoncrime will be updating links to information as it is released.
LINKS:
http://www.clickorlando.com/download/2009/0929/21146565.pdf
http://www.clickorlando.com/download/2009/0929/21146581.pdf
http://www.clickorlando.com/download/2009/0929/21146692.pdf
http://www.clickorlando.com/download/2009/0929/21146648.pdf
http://www.clickorlando.com/download/2009/0929/21146801.pdf
http://www.clickorlando.com/download/2009/0929/21146773.pdf
http://www.clickorlando.com/download/2009/0929/21146722.pdf
http://www.clickorlando.com/download/2009/0929/21146711.pdf
http://www.clickorlando.com/download/2009/0929/21147069.pdf
http://www.clickorlando.com/download/2009/0929/21146984.pdf
Related Posts
Related Posts:
289 Comments
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
OMG, Cindy wanted Dom to look for a live Caylee after she had a funeral??? This would not be believed if it were in a murder mystery show. They should all be arrested and made to get a pscyh exam.
Baez called Cindy “Rosebud”. I am going to vomit. Is that a reference to the famous sled in Orson Wells’ movie? Can’t figure that out.
So Blink is it your opinion that we may not know that Casey’s fingerprints exist on the duct tape until right before or at trial? I keep hoping to see that in the doc dumps but I am starting to believe we won’t see the most damning stuff until trial.
That’s correct. Especially if it is contained in the GJ testimony.
B
Kleat,
Yes, I believe so, the article states the following afterwards:
“That prompted the FBI to scour its own personnel to determine who handled the tape, and tests indicated the DNA belonged to one of their own female technicians.”
This is crazy: (still looking for the ‘Blink’ connection– didn’t see it on 8055)
Pg 8091:
Email from Cindy Anthony, Feb 26th, 2009
Subject listed as RE:… PI/Client Privileged and Confidential…I am back…
Quote including spelling and grammatical errors:
“isnt he crazy enough to do something to Caylee? Remember we originally thought he and Deb were helping Jesse hid Caylee. It might sound crazy but what if they did a blood test and found out she was not a nephilim. People do crazy things like sacrefice fro their strange beliefs.”
———————–
Dominic Casey’s response to Cindy’s message above is:
Quote:
“You have seen nothing yet. What You have seen is the tip of the iceberg…RG is like a Militia Boy, Racist, Demeans women and a total whack job… I will have him on the porno soon…”
(End of message, unquote)
Blink -
Did you read the report from the computer salesman saying he saw Casey and Caylee in Walmart the day after Father’s Day at noon …. I thought cell phone pings showed she was at home until 4 that day. Do you think this computer guy could have his dates mixed up or could she have left the phone at home maybe?
I think his date is wrong. I am awaiting for the announcement Caylee was actually really abducted from the Walmart.
Kidding and snarky, my heart hurts today on the image of the stain. The gruesomeness for the rest too happen in this equation for her to end up in her final place ; Im not sure people grasp the monstrosity of that.
B
Maybe someone can answer this for me. Did Cindy ever acknowledge before they found Caylee any articles of clothing, shoes, or the winnie-the-pooh blanket missing?
Other than allegedly what she knew Casey had with her, and what she wore last. She did not mention the missing Pooh Blanket until it was recovered with her granddaughter. In fact, she stated Casey’s clothes were disappearing by the day, and nothing of Caylee’s was ever removed again.
B
Blink or Kleat. I haven’t read through all the documents yet but I read the posts above. It has been mentioned twice about the stain being the shape of a child in the fetal position. Is it possible at that point that Caylee was not in any bags but just lying in the trunk and perhaps she wasn’t “bagged” until Casey backed that car into the garage? How else would a stain be made in that shape if she were in bags to start with?
I’ve heard of the term ‘misogynist’, but reading Cindy in these emails, I’m wondering if there is a similar term for women who hate men, or who are inspired by a hatred of men? And is this why Cindy has weak men around her to do her bidding and accepting of HER beliefs?
What is the equivalent term to misogynist for a woman with the same attitude but against men?
I’ve looked up ‘nephilim’ and have no idea what specific meaning she might be using. This is going off into a very strange place.
Kleat doesnt the crime labs keep a copy of techs DNA just incase I would think that would be SOP just in case of cross contamination
I detect a somber feeling in all these post it seems evreyone here is hell bent on trying to figure this all out, this is the first time on here that I am not feeling rage, I love this site, hats off to you Blink and all your humble followers. Keep up the good work folks!
Mari — Later in the documents it is confirmed that the female DNA was from one of the techs out of Tampa.
if the stain in he trunk shows body laid out in fetal position I stand by my belief Casey didnt have a babysitter and gased Caylee to be with AL on the 16th, this just my theory, cindy was pissed no chance she was keeping her, she ducted taped her to aviod crying if she (Caylee) woke, and found her dead later….IMO… I just sense this…my Witchy Poo feelings (Blink that one is for you) sorry if I am wrong I just get this theory, helps me sleep at night and not go totally mad, maybe my way of finding understanding is way off base.
dee– yeah, they will have full profiles of everything to exclude any technicians– well, I don’t know that first hand, but basic good proceedure, they must be able to exclude those workers.
Help please– ANYONE have a source for an audio of Joy Wray? I just need to exclude something.
I suppose one would have to think that with the more that evidence is released, the more Crasey is grinding her teeth in anger in that jail cell, realizing people are seeing more and more of her devastation and lack of evidence disposal
Blink, isn’t the importance of the ‘heart sticker-no residue– FBI lab purported destruction of evidence’ important for any argument or discreditation of latent prints of the accused that the defense MUST prepare pro-actively for?
Discrediting the lab and the FBI is important so they can attempt to discredit any latents revealed by the same people, lab, process by association?
Yes, and they should. But imho, the state will be ready to defend that argument with latents on the duct tape that were produced during the destruction.. End justifies the means so to speak.
B
Wow, I have so much to say…BUT, I’m still in the middle of reading all these documents, and I’d like to say everything I’m thinking after I finish reading…. However, I did want to say/ask something while I’m thinking of it.
Blink,
You remember how Cindy made such a big deal of the name being wrong on the Sawgrass card, and how she was screaming for perjury charges, unethical, blah blah blah. Just another attempt to have this case thrown out, as usual…. I mention this because it’s always so funny/strange to me how the Anthony’s truly believe they have their own set of rules. The world has a set of rules/morals/etc. to live by, and then the A’s have their own set.
I say this because I realized that in the very first document link today, about halfway through it, there is a copy of the Letter of Engagement/Agreement with D&A Investigations Inc. Not surprising to me, the witness to the signatures is Sherri Milstead. I’m guessing that they picked her as the witness to the signatures because she would be the last person on earth to call out any wrongdoing by anyone, considering who/what she and her husband are, or have done. I’m just curious if it matters/mattered to anyone then, or now that it isn’t George’s true signature on that document?? Would it not make null and void because there was a witness? Or, is it a type of agreement that isn’t important enough that it matters whether or not the person really signed it or not?? As I said, just strikes me as odd how Cindy tries to find every loophole possible to have this whole thing thrown out….yet she does things such as the signing for George, as if it’s not a big deal, because it’s her and she is apparently untouchable…(in her eyes only)….
Just curious what you thought about that?
#49 Kleat
holly shizznitz the Lab Tech did it! the Lab Tech is next to be run over by the shinny new “Boat” her nickname is “Zanny” i bet
Thanks, Blink– and yes, it’s very common knowledge (general docs I’ve found from forensics specialists online) that fingerprint specialists KNOW full well, that prints would not be revealed on acrylic adhesive tapes, but in this case, the adhesive residue exposed side, would not be expected to have any prints anyway, as the sticker label itself (if any) was gone. That is just defense pre-emptive ‘spin’ before today’s release.
Blink– another question, WHO is this Deb Miliken who has sources supplying the Anthony’s and their lawyer (NeJame at the time) and DC, with seemingly inside info?
This is interesting, Dom Casey says in an email after the baby was recovered, that his investigation would keep going for at least another 9 months (trial date expected at that time). So, what would he be investigating, if not the location of Caylee Marie? She was found– or what other theory did they have that this was not actually her body? (and then, why did they take posession of it?)
Then, just before DC wrote that, but before the body was recovered, Cindy writes to John Allen, Dom Casey, and Nic Savage FBI: (Dated Dec. 08, 2008, about 9 pm)
“thankyou John for your e-mail. I would like to correct you on one thing. Dominic Casey with D&A Investigations is not part of the defense team. They work directly for George and I for the sole purpose of finding Caylee Marie.”
And she follows this with further clarification that “my top priority, as it has been since day one, not relating this to the case against my daughter.”
So, she says it, confirms it, signs it “Sincerely, Cindy Anthony” and sends it cc to the FBI as well– which I understand means it’s a federal offense to lie to the FBI, vs what she says to other authorities.
If Dom Casey was only working for the Anthony’s, and only working to FIND Caylee, and specifically NOT working for the defense from day one until Dec. 8, what changed about this situation soon AFTER dec 8th? Did they revamp their retainer agreement letters of engagement or add new clauses or oral statements to change the original versions as the case changed?
http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/entertainment_tv_tvblog/2009/09/casey-anthony-new-documents-reveal-cindys-strange-quest.html
The above story may shed some light on Cindy’s state of mind. She’s either in some form of denial OR she’s staging to avoid answering why her grand daughter has not been buried respectfully.
Can Cindy Marie Anthony face federal charges in her lies to deceive the FBI? This lie was perpetrated directly to the FBI Nicholas Savage and written and sent before they found the baby’s body, and ‘before’ grieving for the loss as in known death of the baby, and still at a time when they had ‘hope’ to find the baby alive (so their public face said).
Is the defense now going to be that the baby was not Caylee and the search continues as per Dom Casey’s work ‘for another 9 months at least’ (now another year …. and on…)? The defense did have a chance to do it’s own autopsy, but maybe they were not allowed to test DNA independently to cause a different identity result?
(and ‘d’ aka deb of debandkatelyn@yahoo.com aka deb miliken and her sources, signs her
email to Dominic Casey, now about “ZFG exists– katies employment”, as
“love- d” (why would she sign it ‘LOVE’ if this is a professional investigation, professional connections– or i DEB the ‘D’ in D&A?? and if so, why does she use a yahoo address with ‘katelyn’?)
Excellent Question, but I am even more intrigued by the fact I am positive that a woman of the same name funded the Blink Driving Crew of Gale St. John et al, so when was she working for Dominic?
B
Boy those Anthony’s have black garbage bags with red and yellow tie handles stuffed in everything in their garage.
WESH….must be an ABC station….they report things to try to help the defense IMO!
Say, OT (well, maybe not), did anyone notice on the Florida MSM sites this weekend, that Juliette Lewis was in Orlando??? I wonder if the defense checked ‘her’ out??? Lots of pictures available of the Orlando tour stop.
Blink, & Blinkers.
Just starting to read the new releases. However I want to
say one thing before I begin.
WE ARE THE VOICE OF CAYLEE! No matter how many twist and
turns this case may take. We are here for Caylee, Forever silent
by the hand of EVIL!
It’s interesting that they cast their net so wide to include reporter Jessica D’onofrio. Out of what I have seen from the local stations there, she appeared to give more time to the defense side, (actually pretty balanced coverage). How would uncovering info like that (her affair, or not) ever help to find Caylee or the real killer? She isn’t even a witness in the case. Looks like vengeance or blackmail or who the hell knows what. I could see it if this woman was only presenting info leaked from her paramour that was damaging to the defense, but she wasn’t.
# 70 Kleat
They had all of Caylee’s bones, what was to stop them from doing their own DNA testing?
WESH here locally in Or lawn do is NBC.
I don’t remember the document because I breezed through them in the AM, But what was up with the javascript issue attached to timer55? Are they going to discount all of the computer activity evidence as well, because they believe a hacker was remotely accessing this tag? Computer geniuses please chime in!
Hello,
I just want to say I really enjoy your site and have been following you re: several cases. Kudos to you!
I’m confused about something though…perhaps others could chime in.
We read a few days ago about the possibilty of the alleged heart shaped residue being destroyed (by the fingerprint powder) and that it also wasn’t properly documented. It’s my understanding that the residue was on the top portion (non-adhesive side) of the ducttape, am I right? Now, I just read about the adhesive side of the ducttape being contaminated by the DNA of an FBI lab tech and if I’m reading the report correctly she actually contaminated three pcs of evidence..Q62,Q63 and Q64 w/ the FBI’s conclusion that it’s ‘inconclusive’ b/c of the contamination.
I imagine that the ducttape is some of their strogest evidence against Casey…have they blown it? Possible implications?
The report said the stain that resembles the outline of a child was not caused from any body fluid…i.e. no blood, decomp.
What, then, would have caused the stain/outline to the point of it staying in the truck for such a long period of time?
I wonder if these PI emails, etc, were the ones that someone mysteriously emailed to K Belich (sp?) reporter and Sean Krause. Maybe that’s why they were in Lee’s possesion? Maybe Lee sent them?
On page 8025 of the D. Casey emails back and forth between there is one email from a ‘Lesa Conway” or aconway68@hotmail.com that is supportive of Casey being possibly innocent and offers up some ‘research’ on various names, etc. She claims to be a member of a ‘web based investigative website’.
If you do a search on that email address she commented in 2005 on a cached website called ritualabusetorture.com – its a very strange website and a strange comment that lists places that people were supposedly involved in RAT (Ritual Abuse Torture).
I find that these cases that involve young missing/murdered/ and/or abused children bring out all kinds of people with – for lack of a better word – fetishes for these types of stories.
I think skilled researchers everywhere are going to be running down emails and contact info for days.. as they should.
B
# 80
Maybe the plastic bag (melting in the heat)? or a physical impression left from the weight of the body?
combined with whatever other chemicals or debris, including garbage that were left in the trunk?
#80 Teri says …
“The report said the stain that resembles the outline of a child was not caused from any body fluid…i.e. no blood, decomp.”
Teri, Hello.
Which report are you referring to and where did you read it?
Thank you.
#79 Peggy
“I imagine that the ducttape is some of their strogest evidence against Casey…have they blown it?”
They clearly made mistakes. I don’t know if you can say that the case is blown. Nothing in any evidence released thus far can explain why Casey didn’t call police and waited 30+ days. Plus, why would she not have shared any info since, at least with the people that are ‘investigating’ for her? Why would Zany the nanny take Caylee? What would they want to punish Casey for? At this point, her life is in the toilet. So , even if the people she knew were drug runners, pimps, prostitutes, what have you, wouldn’t you cop to that vs. having to stay in jail on a murder charge? It still doesn’t make any sense, and that is the strongest evidence; the behavior and actions.
There is innuendo about other people on the periphery, but if the PI had come up with something that could substantially clear Casey and direct guilt at someone else, that would have been a hallelujah email between D Casey and C Anthony and that info would have been leaked.
Has anyone done a “Caylee live sightings” timeline with location?
B
IMO, the most significant facts revealed by this latest release (9/29/09) can be found in several internal FBI memos dated September and October 2008 (OSCO Page Nos. 8405, 8406 and 8407) . These memos deal with the absence of and/or poor quality of the raw photo files submitted by OSCO to the FBI for processing. For instance, the FBI detected a very large stain on the trunk liner which appears to be the outline or silhouette of a child in the fetal position. Is this substantial evidence or what? Yet, the FBI says OSCO submitted only a single “small black/white shot noting the A and B staining areas” in which nothing else can be seen unless the photo is looked at on a computer monitor. Questions were raised as to whether OSCO provided supplemental lighting while taking its photos of the trunk area and why they did not take high quality digital photos that can be easily enhanced and enlarged to show greater detail. According to the FBI, it is unaware whether OSCO ever processed the interior of the car or only the car trunk . Another memo points out that Casey’s car is still impounded in OCSO’s CSI garage and it still smells “horrible.” Between the photo showing the outline of small child lying in a fetal position in the trunk and the lingering horrible odor emanating from the car, it seems to me that the members of the jury could easily be convinced that a body had been in her car trunk and that that body most likely was that of her daughter Caylee.
“Has anyone done a “Caylee live sightings” timeline with location?”
Not that I Have seen. But as I recall, rumors were floating earlier that the defense was going to deny that the body was actually Caylee’s. I don’t remember where I saw this. It could have been Topix back in earlier 2009, or Caylee Daily. It wasn’t a blog post, but rather from someone that responded in comments.
If anyone can put something like that together I would imagine it would be Maura, but she might not like me volunteering her efforts.
I couldn’t believe what I was reading about the contamination from the lab, especially on the duct tape. Baez will fight hard to have this evidence thrown out due to this. BUT….what can not be thrown out is the fact, well documented along with photos, that Caylee’s skull was found with duct tape over her mouth and nose area. It was applied so tightly that it held her mandible in place, with the help of her hair, and 6 months in the elements did not change that. That in itself speaks volumes and it will be a major topic in court. JMO
peggy, no, they won’t have ‘blown it’ with regards to the duct tape. See Blink’s comment to me re the contamination DNA– it’s from a tech, they will have to explain it, but that does nothing to ruin the evidence. The heart sticker business ‘powder’ doesn’t ruin anything else– except if there was residue, the person doing the fingerprint testing was NOT apparently considering the possibility of this residue shape being there, at least from what we know.
But we know now that the silver side of that duct tape was polyethelene, which is very stable. Whatever powder they used to recover possible latents from the outer/non-adhesive side of the duct tape, may be able to also reveal prints on acrylic, but don’t know.
This will all be explained more I’m sure. But this doesn’t even relate to prints on the sticky side! WE haven’t heard that yet.
What could the trunk stain have been ‘scrubbed’ with by George and/ or Cindy that would obliterate DNA but not dissolve or affect the rug, underlay and trunk metal/paint? The trunk could have been both scrubbed and wet/dry vaccumed to remove liquid as in carpet cleaning. Was the stain enlarged by this wet cleaning?? No DNA, but why not if decomp– does decomp liquid not contain undecomposed DNA?
Re # 86:
But they still have possession of the car, do they not?
Is the stain still extant, or was it destroyed by the Anthony cleaning?
It seems to be that because they still have the car…it can be re-photographed…or perhaps it is too late.
I am distraught by the stain remarks. Everyone that looked in that trunk and smelled the car knew what had transpired. It is sickening. BTW Cindy and Co. are at it again at the OS site. the posts say that it’s obvious that one of Casey’s friends did it, Jesse or Ricardo I guess. She also spouts off about the Constitution amd attacks the other posters by telling them to get jobs. I had decided that I wasn’t going to remark about Cindy’s posts again but I really let her get to me.
Ricardo is going to get the bullseye, imo… House at Constantine..
B
The text messages @ Daniell Brofi (who wanted to remain anonymous) ooops, thats what you get for putting yourself in the middle of the Anthony camp. WITW is it about. I’m assuming she is trying to help the Anthony’s “frame” Jesse Grund by implicating him in a rape or beating of another person. But the emails don’t make sense to me, I know we’re only seeing her version but who are they to? Who is she texting that they are implicite in Caylee’s dissappearance? I’m confused by them.
Also, having Milstead witness something is like having OJ do it, known liars and felonies, no doubt she wouldn’t hesitate to witness sigs on a forged document if she could benefit from it.
And OOOPPS looks like the SA has Dominic on the fry pan now, these records clearly indicate he was not working for the defense and Casey like he testified, I hope he’s arrested soon also.
The fetal position is just….well its too cold and sad to even think about, and I’m afraid that is just the tip of the proverbial “Iceburg” on this case. I’m sure that what we hear at trial will be a true horror story of Caylee’s life.
Could someone please explain those texts by Danielle Brofi? Thanks
You are so on my page, was just reviewing that as well. Clueless, however, there were several individuals who pretexted this woman and “camp” for reasons only they get.
B
In one of the docs Richard Grund talks about “nephilim”. I googled it: The Nephilim were an antediluvian race (pre-flood) race which are referred to in the Bible as giants. They were reportedly the children born from the “daughters of men”, and the “Sons of God”. It is most important to note that they are mentioned almost simultaneous to God’s statement that He would destroy the earth by flood, and it seems from this association that their affect upon mankind was one of the primary justifications that brought the destruction.
I have no idea what any of that means, but methinks Mr. Grund is a little off the deep end (insert theme from the Twilight Zone here).
ChicagoJudy, I did the same thing, but also noticed that there were several theories about nephilims and that changed over time, apparently. No historical references. Cindy was digging dirt– take that from where it came from– why take Cindy’s allegations or spin on anything, she has an ‘agenda’ clearly. At least until we know more.
Just like Cindy creating all the other allegations– this is ONE DESPERATE woman who will do anything to anyone. Casey will get worse than if she told the truth from the beginning or even after that– her parents are surely seeing to that as it’s clear that Cindy is doing so much work digging, that she forgets to look only for Caylee– it’s about ‘pinning’ not ‘recovering’.
Why is the computer guy on the States Witness List? Could LE have a tape from Walmart? Doesn’t fit the timeline. I dont get it.
The statements by Thompson seem telling, very detailed, fits with what we know about Casey and Caylee’s relationship, fits beautifully with reasons for remembering so much, etc. But I have a real problem with (unless the guy was in a coma or out in the Amazon jungle for the past year) for him coming forward and making these statements about Casey’s visit to his store etc, about his check policy, etc, a full year later.
Unless he wanted to stay out, and was only recently called by investigators who just learned of the connection via maybe security cameras, the details seem a bit too good and prepared. Not that this couldn’t be, I’d question his ability to recall all this without some coloring from what he knew in the past year.
(btw, that doc can be found on pg 8361 + on the pdf number ending with 11 above)
Patience, please. First time poster; long time reader with a bit to say, now. It comes as no surprise, to anyone here, that Casey would have left her two year old child trailing 10 feet behind her. It does surprise me that the witness to this didn’t help her to open the door, and because he did not, I’m a bit suspicious of this alleged Walmart encounter. It just stands to reason (okay so, my own reasoning) that having already felt such empathy for Caylee, as when Casey displayed what the gentleman described as “jealousy” over the beannie baby (the last gift Caylee would ever receive), he would have been quick to jump to her rescue by opening the door for her, rather than to have stood back and watched what had to have been a struggle for such a small child. In my all but expert opinion, then, this incident just didn’t happen, and if it did, he’s just one more of the many self-centered souls who left Caylee to drift like a feather in the wind.
All the more saddening, indeed, is seeing mirrorized images of such as the impression of her body in the trunk of the car, curled into a fetal position, along with the description of her soggy mass of hair yet adhered to the criminal duct tape. For as long as I live I will not ever understand how it is that any of the Anthonys can sleep at night, let alone make so many TV appearances, begging our sympathies for their negligent/abusive, if not murderous daughter.
It beyond sickens me. Devastation sets in when I think of how alone she (Caylee) was, and how frightened she must have been, not one but many times, as is indicated by the dark circles beneath her eyes in many of the photographs of her, as well as her cautious, wide eyed, glances in her mother’s direction. I also tend to wonder if Casey didn’t frequent that wooded area with her, long before her death. Judging from some of the debris that was found near to the remains, couldn’t it be that Casey took her daughter there, for lack of any place else to be when she was supposed to be working but wasn’t, and when Caylee was supposed to have been with the nanny but wasn’t? What did she do with her child all day long? Drive around and around and around? It isn’t likely. Nor is it likely that she hung out in parks each and every day, for fear that someone would see her there.
Also, the report states that the leftover mass of Caylee’s hair was wet, and needed to be dried. Why was it wet if in fact the dump site was dry as the defense alleges now? And why couldn’t she have been deposited near to the concrete pavers that D. Casey returned to, a few times? She was a small child. Large animals could have moved the bag to where it was eventually found, even neighboring dogs, or it could have been moved by the rising waters, could it not? Her final resting place may not have been where she was originally left, though she was there for a very long time. Imagine, plant life having rooted and thrived in what remained of her. The death penalty doesn’t seem good enough. Let Casey live and suffer. Turn her prison cell into the trunk of a car, turn up the heat, and throw a few dead rats in there to rot. Really big rats!
And will soneone please explain to me what it is that Cindy hasn’t been arrest for obstruction? Why does the MSM waste its time on that known LIAR who destroyed evidence knowingly and purposefully!
Sigh. I could go on and on but I’ll spare you, having but one other question, does it not state in the documents leading up to the stain in the trunk of the car that to identify such a stain as being left by a body “speculation”? I do so pray you’re right Blink, about fingerprints being on the duct tape, though I don’t know that it’s all that neccessary. 31 days missing. Lying through her (their) teeth, substantiated by available taped evidence. The known destruction of evidence prior to (if memory serves me correctly) calling the authorities and so stating, “It smells like there’s been a dead body in the damn car!”
I think I’ll go throw up and then cry, now.
Gavi
Gavi, welcome, and very insightful first post.
B
Sorry for the type-o’s. Got upset. Be blessed, and be sure to love on a child, today.