Caylee/Casey Case: Dominic Casey Takes Stand in Zenaida Gonzalez Case
Orlando, FL– Dominic Casey, private investigator for Casey Anthony and George and Cindy Anthony, took the stand today in the civil case against Casey for Zenaida Gonzalez.
Uhoh. Motion Denied without prejudice to compel Dominick Casey to testify in the civil case against Casey Anthony.
However, we have some discrepancies from Mr. Casey. In his interview on January 7, 2009 with Orange County Sheriff’s Office, Dominic Casey states he has contracts with George, Cindy, Jose Baez and Casey Anthony.
These are the dates given:
Jose Baez– July 29, 2008, terminated by Dominic on October 1, 2008.
Casey Anthony– September 12, 2008
The Anthony’ s– “sometime before the contract and after Jose Baez.” Once Baez blocked contact with Casey after October 12.
For reasons unknown, on the stand today, he gave these dates:
Jose Baez– July 27, 2008 to present.
Casey Anthony– “sometime in early September”
George and Cindy Anthony’s– July 27th, but agreement in October.
HEH?
The discrepancies beg the question.. Is it a coincidence that the agreement with Jose Baez is dated the same day as the opening of the first trust account at Sun Trust Bank, and the agreement with Casey directly is dated the day it was closed by the bank on September 12?
Judge Rodriguez also intimated he will be making a decision on whether to delay the trial until after the murder trial much sooner than expected.
Prediction: The Civil Case will be put on the back burner.
Check back to blinkoncrime.com for updates
Related Posts
Related Posts:
1,005 Comments
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
I had a nightmare.
How or why has Baez been able to mesmerize Casey to the point where she believes she will be acquitted? If you listen to the jail conversation in August (the frustration fest) between Casey and her parents, even Cindy seems to be questioning the abilities of her counsel (you’re right Blink, I think she knew then what we all know now). Casey all but dismissed her concern, implying that Baez was just about her only ally, even though he was on his own media tour at the time. If there’s an inkling of sympathy for her at all, it would be that her counsel has not been (or refuses to be) successful in convincing her of her best interest. To me, it borders on malpractice if he really has not brought up a plea deal scenario, or if he is advising against it.
I agree that Casey will be nailed on circumstantial evidence and there will be no doubt of her guilt. The evidence to me is overwhelming and destroyed glue is not going to change that. I think that Baez has an ongoing opportunity to bargain for a plea deal though, and the state would accommodate, provided the sentencing fits the crime. It seems like the state’s eager to try the case but personally, I think her dysfunctional family will, in the end, save her from the chair in the penalty phase anyway. Does Baez think/know he quite possibly has an ongoing plea option?
I also thing the public would have a hard time accepting the prosecutors depleting the state coffers on a trial and appeals if the defense proposed a deal to spare his client (and us) the agony (and expense) of a court fiasco.
I know that the courts are doing everything in their power to suppress any opportunity for an appeal based on her counsel, but it’s hard to imagine that Casey wouldn’t throw him under the bus as well on appeal if she’s resigned to life, or death with a conviction. Could she argue that she didn’t have an understanding of the implication of evidence and that, had her attorney effectively counseled her, she might have proposed/accepted a deal? Who knows what is being discussed under attorney/client privilege? If there’s anything I worry about regarding this case, it’s that ineffective counsel will ultimately play a role.
Even though Judge Strickland has ruled Baez is on top of his game from an effective counsel standpoint (tee hee), could it later be argued that it was only to that point and he became ineffective subsequently, as in every single instance since then? It seems to be plain as day and well documented. Or would it be moot, as the state doesn’t have a plea deal on the table, and hasn’t since prior to Caylee being found.
No worries that she won’t beat the rap…just that her defense will never go away.
I know I said I would try to stay out of the way of progress in figuring out this case, but nightmares scare me.
I agree that the loss of the heart-shaped sticker residue evidence is a pretty big whoops, especially since the FBI noticed it and the FBI failed to capture a photo of it before the tape was powdered. It was the presence of a heart-shaped sticker on the duct tape over Caylee’s mouth that made that piece of evidence significantly more disturbing (as if duct tape wasn’t disturbing enough) and indicated a personal relationship between Caylee and her killer. Since only one person saw it and since all evidence of it has been lost, I’m not sure Strickland would allow the agent’s testimony about having seen a heart shape on the tape. And as the news report mentioned, the CSIs found a heart-shaped sticker at the scene, but it was attached to a piece of cardboard. Presumably, if a sticker had been on the tape and come loose, it would not have had enough adhesive to attach itself to a piece of cardboard. Bottom line is that it would be difficult to prove that there was a heart-shaped anything on the tape.
I don’t doubt that the FBI found one or more partial fingerprints on the tape, but we know nothing about the size or quality of what prints were found. The FBI has a minimum 12-point quality assurance standard for prints, and maybe the FBI found a couple of fragments on the tape, but they are so deteriorated that only a one, two, or three point match could be made to Casey’s prints. It’s better than nothing, but nobody should think that just because the FBI may have found fingerprints on the tape that the case is therefore buttoned up. The defense knows what was found on the tape but what they learned has not made them back down from public “Casey is innocent” claims.
I also agree that the defense is not planning to point the finger at any one person – a strategy that would certainly backfire in a big way. Seems to me the whole point of asking for the phone records (with tower pings to indicate location) of twelve people including Amy, Tony, Ricardo, Jesse, etc. is to find suggestive evidence that any one of them independently could have done the deed or that some of them could have been working together (a laughable stretch, but you never know).
I was once struck when reading one of Amy’s OCSO interview transcripts that at least twice she said she “loved Caylee to death.” If Amy were not a sympathetic figure, imagine the chatter we’d be reading about her “slip.” Then there’s Jesse’s first birthday card to Caylee in which he apparently expressed his love for her in language that maybe is more appropriate for an adult lover. How about Tony Lazzaro’s lie to Lee about getting the gas cans? Tony told Lee he stayed in the car listening to music while Casey got the gas cans by herself. In his later OCSO testimony, he revealed that he was the one who broke the padlock using the Jeep’s tire iron. If he lied about that, what else did he lie about? And let’s not forget about Ricardo’s chloroform icon and (according to Lee) his narcotics history and unhealthy (in my opinion) sleeping arrangements when Casey and Caylee spent the night with him when he and Casey were lovers.
I do not see any chance of the defense’s attempting to pin the death on George and Cindy only because their great love for Caylee is not in dispute by anyone. Put that in the context of Casey’s Diary of Days post and Cindy’s My Caylee is Missing post and deleted July 14-15 Yahoo email, both of which express Cindy’s hope that Casey will let Cindy see and talk to Caylee and reveal Cindy’s failure to understand why Casey had not been allowing her to do either. Add in Cindy’s frustrated drive to Universal on July 3 and Lee’s attempt to track down case the same night. There is just too much evidence that Casey was avoiding George and Cindy because Casey knew Caylee was dead and wanted to keep that information from her parents as long as possible.
I believe 100% everything you just posted, but I would be remiss if I did not point out the side gate open and pool ladder moved. They do not have to prove someone else did it. They have to provide a scenario wth enough potential to instill reasonable doubt.
I don’t think they have enough peripheral ammunition for anyone but the Anthony’s. George stated himself he was the last one to see them. Cindy calls George and asks him if he left the gate open. Cindy emails Casey and says Dad says he was at work all day and did not stop home.. I don’t know.. or words to that effect. What I consider the very inconcistencies and in some cases lies will provide the foundation for the. She did it , no he did it, or maybe they did it defense.
Not new, but in a case where most despise all of them, not that hard to swallow in a death penalty case. It will allow George and Cindy to plead the 5th, which is the goal in the first place.
I agree their love for Caylee was without question while she was alive, but in her MURDER, it apparently does not rise to the level of seeking justice for her, if it prosecutes their daughter or derails the gravy train.
Out of curiosity, can Baez quit as Casey Anthony’s lawyer? If so, why wouldn’t he walk away? He took this case, perhaps, because he truly thought it was an abduction. Somewhere along the way, he must have come to realize it was a homicide. Why on earth would he keep digging his own professional grave?
Also, just a thought, very random… During Casey’s ‘text’ conversations with Amy, she often referred to men as boys or meat. Objectfying men much? Boys implies a sense of ‘cluelessness’ & ‘helplessness’ in the manner of which Casey speaks of them. Insight into her psyche regarding men? It wouldn’t surprise me seeing that she grew up with Cindy verbally smacking George around. George is, imo, a victim of abuse and Casey witnessed these attacks growing up. Nature vs. nurture. Did she learn the behaviour that lead to little Caylee’s death?
And that’s my two cents. God bless y’all!
# 845-good point Kleat
sorry 846
The hair with postmortem banding was NOT destroyed by anyone. The section of the hair showing the banding is on a slide at Quantico. A tiny section of the shaft was tested for mitochondrial DNA, and there is plenty of the shaft remaining for the defense to test. The defense will be allowed to observe the banding and DNA test a piece of the shaft – exactly the same evidence as is available to the SAO.
The hair that was completely consumed by DNA testing was the 1/4 inch piece found on the shovel that had been collected from Brian Burner. There was only that one 1/4 piece, so there was no chance of saving any for the defense.
One of the lawyer-members on WS once wrote that she works as a prosecutor (not in Florida), and it’s the standing policy of her department that if a sample of DNA source evidence is so tiny that the entire thing will be consumed by the test, then the defense lawyers are invited to have an expert observe the testing. That is a very fair and enlightened policy IMO.
However, as we’ve heard over and over in the hearings, the FBI does not allow outside observers into its labs, so that would not have been an option for Baez’s experts. It would have been an option to test the hair at a Florida crime lab and allow a defense expert to observe, but that wasn’t done.
The FBI also destroyed a three-inch piece of Caylee’s bone for DNA testing of the remains, but I am very sure the ME photographed the bone piece from all angles to preserve evidence that the piece did not show evidence of antemortem trauma. The defense was in constant contact with the family, so if they didn’t preserve a piece of bone for their own testing (prior to Caylee’s cremation), it’s their own fault, and they will have NO argument against the SAO regarding the destruction of that three-inch piece of bone.
In case you didn’t know……
“Let me be crystal clear. This is just the tip of the iceburg. There is no evidence in this sham of a case. This witch-hunt to nowhere has the cost the tax payer million$.
As this costly persecution unfolds – you will see each and every piece of so called “evidence” fall apart. Your jaws will drop when you see how this beautiful young mother was crucified by the media.
Wake up sheeple and demand an immediate dismissal.
God Bless
OrlandoEAST (09/25/2009, 7:33 AM )”
Before everyone pulls back the arrow at ada, I think ada is pointing out a post appearing elsewhere.
B
Very interesting, Kleat, and what a great book cover for this case: a fingerprint with a blanked out heart shape in the middle.
Honestly, I don’t know why in this day and age the FBI wouldn’t just photoshop a fake photo of the sticker residue (but I guess it’s very comforting that they didn’t, lol—talk about a mistrial)
I truly feel the State is holding on to the best evidence for the trial. We won’t get the good stuff until then…….in like the year 2015
#849 Ragdoll
Though I firmly believe Baez has been oozing self-interest since the onset of the case, I think it would benefit his self-interest far more if he were to pull out under the guise of ethics. It would give him a tad of credibility and his platform would be endless, starting with his experience being inexperienced and lessons learned. I can’t think of an attorney who has been more over his head in a case.
Thanks Blink. I am not wearing any protective gear. When I went to read about the “evidence destroying’ I saw Orlando East’s post. I also read that it is highly unlikely that the FBI did not take hundreds of photos of that duct tape around Caylee’s mouth, so there is a record of the evidence.
# 857-Yes,typical….and what we don’t see in OrlandoEast’s posts ever, is any kind of pain or outrage that there is a baby killer on the loose. What is not said is much more telling than what is.
Yes, I believe everyone has already figured out who OrlandoEAST is…………Hello Spindy! How’s ya hammer hanging?
PS Baez did not fabricate the story of the destroyed sticker residue. WKMG broke the story, and they learned of the destruction from correspondence between the SAO and the FBI. Baez certainly may have leaked it to WKMG, but he didn’t make it up.
http://www.clickorlando.com/news/21104174/detail.html
Quote from article:
“Page 9316 of the discovery, obtained by Local 6 before its official release, is a handwritten FBI Laboratory Activity and Communication Log. In it, FBI lab request coordinator Erin P. Martin makes notes of conversations between FBI agents in the field and the lab in Quantico, Va.”
#863
Granmomma, you are dead on. OrlandoEast is a name used in TOPIX forums. It’s pretty much been established that Cindy is OrlandoEAST, among other user names.
Remember Caylee!
#860 OnASeriousNote
Thank you for addressing my question. There’s no doubt he’s benefitted monatarily from this case but as you clearly point out, ethically, it would be a wise decision.
Legally, is he able to drop the case?
Oh…not agreeing Ada is Cindy (my apologies). I’ve read a number of similar posting by OrlandoEAST.
I am over the top angry at that ignorant posting by OrlandoEAST. Caylee’s murder = sham of a case?
857# Where blink? cause I almost got sick…
#866 – Ragdoll
I hope not, but that’s the extent of my knowledge on the matter.
#868 Dee
Usually in a Topix forum but there are MANY on Casey Anthony. OrlandoEAST posts on as many as possible.
#869 Thank you for sharing. Much obliged friend =)
we can’t beat up on the blind, whoever they might be, we just have to enlighten them on the truth and the facts. That is what we are all here for, Truth and Justice for the ones who couldn’t fight the evil out there.
Dee #868
Ha! I needed that good laugh.
Re: #864 — I don’t think many of us ever believed the info was false — just shocked that this could have happened.
Here is another quote from the article — “The disclosure that potential evidence was destroyed comes in a document turned over to the defense but not yet released by the Orange-Osceola State Attorney’s Office, which has made public 8,000 pages of discovery in the criminal case.” This leads me to believe that the the info/leak came directly from the defense.
Also, IIRC Brad Conway made a statement several months ago that there was no sticker on the duct tape (anyone here have this info?). At the time I thought this was odd, but then concluded he was just playing with words — we all know there was no sticker found, but there was residue. In hindsight this looks to me like BC, and probably the defense, had knowledge of the destroyed residue quite a while ago. Why wait til now to bring it up?
With or without the sticker nothing and I mean NOTHING will ever amount to the fact such a wonderful caring and loving mother DOES NOT report her child missing there will never be a way to get past that EVER…oh yeah and the smell in the car and the Decomposition verification from FBI Lab…
I think during an interview that Cindy did with Geraldo..she stated that there was no heart shaped sticker.
steadychick, indeed, though technically a sticker WAS found, but it was attached to a piece of cardboard in the crime scene (it was a cute raised red plastic sticker—you know, kind of in puffy, 3D relief).
ada, the problem with the photos of the duct tape pieces just on their own is that the residue was not visible. It was only when the latent prints unit at the FBI labs was dusting for prints that they noticed what looked to be sticky residue in the shape of a heart, and then they sent the piece of tape off to another FBI lab to analyze the sticky stuff. But I guess they didn’t take pictures of the duct tape with the fingerprint powder on it that rendered the sticky stuff visible? dunno—we’ll see!
why arent my posts going through???? BLINK HELP!!!
They are loca, not following. This site is moderated
B
#854 Ragdoll. George invites at least verbal abuse. (See Cindy’s brother’s comments about him.)I’d like to show him some good hard physical abuse. Snap him out of whatever coma he’s hiding in. Stand up for that precious child you claimed to have so much affection for, George. He is a drama queen. The entire family is afflicted with overacting. George is a major player. His attempts to ingratiate himself with the LE guys is risible. They have his number.(“We think you know a lot about a lot of things, George.”) And his PR suicide atempt? Death by a reallly good pizza? What scriptwriters be these Anthonys!
850 Joan
Dr. G didn’t notice the sticker residue, so it wasn’t obvious to the naked eye. From the FBI correspondence log obtained by Local 6 News, only one person in the FBI lab observed the heart shape on the tape. No other person was called over to verify it by observation. No photo was taken of the heart shape before the tape was powdered, and the powdering obliterated all traces of the heart.
It appears the info about the destroyed residue is not a leak, but came from an attachment to the defenses spoilation motion — http://www.clickorlando.com/download/2009/0924/21103527.pdf Why haven’t we seen this before? Did Baez get it from the latest set of documents released to the defense, but not yet released to the public?
re: 820 Loca – I believe the Blanchard Park story was told by Casey to Lee as soon as the Sawgrass story was disproved (empty apt., etc) on July 16th. I assume it was shared w/ the family then, albeit vaguely at that point because Casey claimed that she was/they were in danger if she revealed much. Sorry I am not supplying links here but I thought it was part of Lee’s original testimony.
Randie,
hey that messed up my friday night beer…
I want to be clear that I never meant to say I believe Cindy killed Casey. I was only attempting to show what I felt could be reasonably argued by the defense. The fact that they are not looking for the kidnapper, yet still claim Casey is innocent and the “killer” is still out there, seems to me, to point only towards the family.
I also, think Baez knew from the start that Caylee was dead, as I also believe the family knew from as far back as August, again, there were no real attempts to find a kidnapper, only finger pointing at friends of Casey. I think Baez fought so hard to keep the case because he knew if would be a long, media circus of a trial and he is hoping to be the latino Johnny Cochran, which he will never be.
Casey also forfeited any rights to appeal due to insufficient counsel when she rejected Judge Strickland’s advise to hire DP qualified atty’s. She signed off on Baez, and cannot use that later on as an appellate issue, unless she can show some other form of misconduct (i.e. he never told me I had a plea option). But I would find it hard to believe that with the entire team of L. Baden and Ms Lyons that Casey has not been presented with all of her options. Including the fact that in his responses to fight the DP Malacuso addressed several different “accidental” death options and/or/also mental defectpossiblities, which is in direct opposition to what Baez is saying/doing.
You can’t blame the defense for throwing anything and everything out there and hoping something sticks. Their client has screwed to pooch on this one and left them with little to work with, especially if she is declining their advice and sticking to her “Nanny” story with them also. If I was the judge I would have made them take the motion to dismiss back and rewrite just on the inconsistencies of transposing OCSO and OSCO several times. Your basing your dismissal on an agency that you say committed several violations of your clients rights, and you can’t even get their acronysm right??? Please did anyone read it before they signed it????
I also think the loss, if its true of the sticker physically isn’t going to be an issue. IF the FBI or OCSO or ME doesn’t have pics etc. there is either a way around it or they just won’t use it, they have enough other evidence to support their case IMO.
And ORLANDOEAST…. Go do something for your granddaughter that will bring her justice and not line your pockets, your pathetic, and KARMA is a BITCH that you can’t control like you do George
Whoops, I have it backwards! The FBI folks could see the heart shaped residue BEFORE the powder process destroyed it (the powder did not stick to the sticky residue? or cuz they use other things on the tape besides the powder?) Anyway,
SNIP
On Dec. 13, two days after the body was found, she describes how Elizabeth K. Fontaine, a forensic examiner in the lab’s latent print operations unit, noticed “a heart shape/outline” on the duct tape, but was “unable to see it after powder process.” That process is used to lift any fingerprints from materials. No such prints were found on the tape, according to previously released FBI lab reports.
But the presence of a heart shape on the tape begs an obvious question: Did the FBI lab photograph the outline of the heart before it was apparently obliterated by the powder process?
Martin answers the question with her next notation: “No photo of image.”
….Two days later, on Dec. 15, 2008, Martin logs a call from an FBI evidence response team agent working in Orlando: “Agent wanted to know if TEU (the lab’s trace evidence unit) saw anything on tape.” Martin apparently checks and writes next: “Per TEU: No, didn’t see any heart-shaped item.”
She then checks again with the latent print unit and writes: “Shape/outline was … near end on non-adh(esive) side.”
—-
more http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/09/25/crimesider/entry5339513.shtml
#851 – OnaSeriousNote – You have hit on something very important. You have verbalized what has not been fully discussed at length by anyone yet. (That I know of). You hit on the fact that Baez may not be filling Casey in on everything that may be in her best interest legally. There seems to be an alterior motive behind everything he does, as well as everything her parents do. I can see where she is kept in the dark because of Baez’s desire to isolate her and keep her on course with what his ideals are for this explosive and tragic case. It is almost like an abusive relationship. He is in control, and the only way to stay in control is to isolate, and keep others away from her so she can’t talk – even if she wanted to. She is at his mercy. He may throw her a bone once in a while and clue her in to some small stuff if she asks too many questions, but at the end of these visits, she probably ends up feeling clueless and hopeless. Wouldn’t it be ironic if she decides to ditch this “cereal box defense” (loved that one) and come clean with the truth because she was sick of being used and abused by everyone? (Including her parents). She could let the cards fall as they may, and perhaps her truth would in some karmic way be the beginning of the end to this opportunistic group. She could be in control and possibly work out a deal – according to what really happened – that would keep her from the death penalty or LWOP. I am not making her the hero in this scenario, just an inmate who takes control of her own destiny.
That would be the dream version of this never ending nightmare…..
Yep, that’s fair. Thanks Blink.
For those that are interested I put together a short list of six sponsors of the CBS show “48-Hour Mysteries.” These are advertisers on the shows website, I don’t know if they would also be TV sponsors or not (don’t have TV). Of the six I couldn’t find two email contacts but I’ve included the company’s name and maybe you’ll have better luck than I.
I emailed CBS (http://tinyurl.com/ks9jx6) to start with, to express my disappointment with their producers decision to air a show interviewing Cindy Anthony before the case has been tried in the courts. As if it may be news to them, I explained that I’ve not yet seen a single interview with her where she did not lie and I cannot support their decision to give her any more airtime to contaminate the jury pool with. There’s a most excellent letter by a woman named Patti at this site (http://tinyurl.com/ybadz29) if you’re interested. And like anyone else I’ve heard/read about, I would not flutter an eyelash (à la George) at whatever they decide to air AFTER the trial.
Here are the links:
Kaspersky Lab ~ service@kaspersky.com
Free Credit Report ~ http://tinyurl.com/njgd4k
behome24/7.com ~ http://tinyurl.com/koxtf7
superpages.com ~ Toll Free Telephone No. 1-800-428-8722
AT&T ~ Tried and tried ~ couldn’t find a contact email
ADT Home Security ~ again, no email contact no.
I skipped over about a dozen juicy looking comments made above this one so am off to read them now!
Hmmmmmmm ~ I see that the email links within my text didn’t work. How’s this:
CBS 48-Hour Mysteries: http://tinyurl.com/ks9jx6
Great letter by Patti:
http://niecey456.wordpress.com/2009/09/24/licensing-fees-payment-i-thought-so-they-are-selling-caylees-pics/
If these don’t work I guess you could cut & paste.
Not to forget, guys:
Blink says, “I dont mind if folks as individuals wish to express their feelings on the issue directly, as long as they approach it as individuals, and not representative of me or blinkoncrime.com.”
The defense obviously wants everyone to get off on this ‘sticker’ tangent– not because it’s that important itself, but because they can say ‘we told you the state, the FBI, OSCO etc’ ‘SPOILED’ and destroyed evidence.
BTW, that choice of word ‘spoliation’ is excellent although it does not apply as a term in criminal law, if we can believe Jeff Ashton, but Ms. Lyon would not have used the incorrect word– this was done for the PUBLIC from which the JURY will be drawn. The word ‘spoil’ is being thrown out there even though no one from the defense wrote ‘spoil’, it’s a word that we all know, spoiled rotten, spoiled as in ruined, went bad.
But that’s not even the root of the word they used but that’s what people are repeating. (it’s not spoiliation, it’s spoliation)
Good play on the defense’s part– it’s for the jury.
#879 MsEnscene
LOL @ death by a really good pizza.
Agreed! Not making excuses for George. Just an observation about Casey’s ability to objectify men and use them to suit her purpose (understatement of the year). I’m just wondering if this is ‘nature’ (ie: sociopath) or nurture (learned behaviour). Even the justice system is undecided about the role abuse plays in a crime.
It’s clear Cindy and George are trying to convince a nation they’ve are misunderstood (my gag reflexes just kicked in) but have they convinced themselves they are victims? Has it ever been about Caylee, with these people? That poor little child was in the middle from day one. The Anthony’s may have loved Caylee, but what a horrific way to express it and receive it. JMHO
Does anyone think that George and Cindy would be doing anything differently, if there were no dp sought? They didn’t want to mitigate anything nor did Casey want to help find Caylee pre-dp, and they have obviously stuck to the same tactic, no wavering.
Leads one to believe that they know Casey is guilty and they have no choice but to go all the way with the ‘faint innocent hope’.
The disclosure that potential evidence was destroyed comes in a document turned over to the defense but not yet released by the Orange-Osceola State Attorney’s Office, which has made public 8,000 pages of discovery in the criminal case.
Page 9316 of the discovery, obtained by Local 6 before its official release, is a handwritten FBI Laboratory Activity and Communication Log. In it, FBI lab request coordinator Erin P. Martin makes notes of conversations between FBI agents in the field and the lab in Quantico, Va.”
http://www.clickorlando.com/news/21104174/detail.html
YES KLEAT
REGARDING BLANCHARD PARK GEORGE DID MAKE THAT COMMENT!:)
840 RANDIE
thanks:)
all you nice blinker’s ave a great and safe blessed weekend
till we meet again HAPPY TRAILS TO YOU
#892 kleat, I think they’ve transformed into a loose cannon. Apparently, they believe the phrase “two wrongs don’t make a right”, does not apply to them. Selling Caylee down the river by lying to law enforcement, added with washing the “dirty” jeans along with the switch-a-roo hairbrush, and topping it all off by feeling content with being paraded around like trailer-park royalty to the Ritz Carlton, high quality dining, and being paid $200,000 for photos. In literature, this is a classic “Fausto” screenplay right before our eyes
Sue # 886 “You hit on the fact that Baez may not be filling Casey in on everything that may be in her best interest legally.”
That may have been the case with Baez initially, but I would wager that Lyon laid out the unmitigated truth to Casey, in terms of options, warts and all. I think Casey locked Baez into the defense that he is stuck with. Although it would have helped Casey if he did not speak about specifics (of her statements, etc) to the media from the get-go.
# 892
Kleat
Sorry for the snark coming, but the Anthonys have been selling BS (literally, to the highest bidder) since very shortly after Casey came home from jail. Casey had been tossing out BS to her friends and family for years running. The family shoveled more on top of that heap to cover for Casey’s pregnancy, theft, and whatever other foibles. Why would they change their modus operandi? It’s what has worked for them for years. I’m beginning to believe that it is the foundation of their family dynamic.
1800 – my lemon !
LOL